I created PERSIA-INDIA GIGA EMPIRE to get that RARE EU4 Achievement
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 січ 2023
- Mewar campaign playlist - • EU4 1.34 Mewar
Join our future mps here on Discord: / discord
Twitch: / zlewikktv
Instagram: / zlewikk
FB Group: / zlewikk
Patreon: / zlewikktv
Twitter: / zlewikk
Merch: www.strategywear.com/
#eu4 #europauniversalis #mewar
EU4 1.34 Lions of the North is already live and it's a BANGER. Today I'll play as one of the most interesting nations in India... Mewar with a goal t get 3 different achievements while going from Hindu to Sikh!
Modset: steamcommunity.com/sharedfile... - Ігри
- Mewar campaign playlist - ua-cam.com/play/PLQYwQrZmzDdK4n0KAGsh4X61YVsZL7Tqk.html
- If you want to join Zlewikk Blobers MP, come to my Discord channel: discord.gg/NAys3pf 🌍
- More livestreams with content like this on www.twitch.tv/zlewikktv🎤
if you wanna do a sikh campaign one day do it as the ottomans. The sikh man of europe.
YES
How is that not an achievement in the game already? Paradox loves puns for achievements.
@@Redarmy1917 well, they ARE updating Ottomans next patch so, there's hope
Why is that not already an achievement... Paradox step up ur game
I'm pretty sure there is an achievement related to that in Vicky 3
Could you consider making another Chaotic Succession series, but this time with switching to the countries which are in dire situation (something like "Saving your ruined campaigns")?
We will see 🙃
Finally there is a big eu4 youtuber that knows AND uses the "Trading from trading Companies" bonus to Goods Produced!
Did you have Printing press embraced at the end? If not then this would have boosted your Goods produced-Bonus even further.
Yeah, I use it a lot in mp, can get A LOT from just a few destates
I struggle to find a single video of yours that I don't enjoy, that core creation cost is amazing
Thank you sir!
When I play Mughals I usually just shove all my trade from India into Hormuz because you can make it a sudo end node and keep all of the money there. As far as my gameplay I need to be more willing to take out loans to where I am still making some ducats and buy a bunch of manufactories. I always feel dirty taking out loans and so I avoid it when possible. Learning a ton from you Zlewikk!
When I started playing (about a year ago) I had the same mindset - loans were the worst thing I could imagine, basically a bankruptcy, and I really wanted to avoid them. Now I still don't like being in debt, but I use them more freely whenever I need money to invest into manufactories, institutions or wars.
I started from kangra and took over the world. Super challenging but incredibly fun campaign
I was just bingewatching your sassanian MP campaign when I got the notification of this new video. Nice timing 👍
Glad to hear that!
Finally I was waiting for this so long
Giga Chad empire
Yes
będzie powtórka jak grasz po 50lat krajami? super mi się oglądało :)
"Cyk, cyk, cyk!"
- Zlewikk The Villain (that's what TV stands for), the greatest war criminal
Love the honesty about forgetting.
Sorry!
@@ZlewikkTV it's all good lol. I just love how you said it. Thanks for the content.
I’m just finishing my sikh bengal-bahrat campaign, which ideas are better? I chose bahrati ideas party for the seperatism
Well if you are playing in Asia the best trade nodes are Malacca and Persia, you can make them into endnode and make bank of them, in Africa it Zanzibar if I remember correctly, in eastern Europe it was Polis, but 1.34 patch added Baltic sea node into the game, in western Europe of course it's 3 end nodes, but primarily English channel
Impressive, you've managed to be wrong not once but twice. If you are playing in Asia you would never want your end trade node to be in Malacca. It is because most of China, all of Persia and India - so the richest nodes, aren't going into it. If you are playing in Asia you should make your end node in Persia but tbh you should make it in Constantinople. You want to control Mallaca and Coromandel so the trade isn't going to Africa.
1.34 didn't add Baltic node, the node was always there, from the moment the game was released and you never wanted to collect in Kraków node. Even when you were playing as Poland or PLC, you'd be changing your trade node from it to Baltic. In Eastern Europe you collect trade node either in Baltic or Novogrod - depnding on the control of each region. This is because Baltic is only going to Lubec and Novogrod only to Baltic (as white sea is meaningless). If you are playing western Europe you collect it either in Sevilla or english - the 2nd one is better as it's trade node. If you are playing medditerain you collect ideally in Genoa, as all of Asia and most of Africa can travel to it through Alexandria and Ragusa and all of America and the rest of Africa can go to it through Sevilla and then Valencia.
@@P.H.226 if you ain't playing trade nation, eastern European nodes except Polis are trash, and if you are playing plc then it's easier to change you node into North sea for that matter.
If you saying that Malacca is bad, it because you didn't try it to play there.
Properly.
Changing your node from Persia to polis for extra 200 dukats is pointless, for me personally, it wouldn't make changes especially if you already conquered whole Persia, Levant and India subcontinents at that point. And it would ruin your TK setup.
For europe it's only the end nodes that matter, for Spain it's Genoa for other colonizors English Channel. Period.
@@torgomaghanyan7633 except polish trade node is also trash, that is precisely why you want to do it atleast in baltic. Obviosuly you want to have the end nodes but realistically speaking if you play for example Teutons or russian country or poland, you won't have english chanell until like 1700's because your focus will be more towards the east. However, you can easily focus on baltic. So no, you would never collect in polish node except for the beggining of the game, when you habe no other choice as poland, which again changes in like 30-40 years max.
Aegument for chaning persian into polish is stupid. I've never mentioned it, so idk why you even bringing that up. At best you'd change it from pwrsia to baltic or by extenstion to english (much later in the game). You'd want that because it's extra 200 ducats. You cannot deny it's importance as it pushes you towards economic hegemony, which is important.
You are jumping to much on the timeline. You are making points about early game (polish trade node) and super late game (end nodes) be precise. Also if you are playing PLC you wouldn't want to change into northern sea as it's simply not worth it. 1st of all it isn't even easier as PLC conquers half of Baltic naturally by killing monastic orders for the mission and then there is just Sweden. Northern sea is simply further and thus less on the way. However, the most important thing is the trade retention. Northern sea goes into engliah chanel so you will always loose some money by collecting there. It's far easier to conquer whole scandinavia to gaij both northern sea and huge portion of lubeck to simply collect in baltic, where the retion would be lower.
I have over 2k hours in this game, I've done most of the hardest achievments, the others I didn't do because I didn't want to but I'm still pretty able, so yes I did play in Malacca and bc of that I can assure you that this region is garbage as a COLLECTING TRADE NODE, when it comes to WHOLE ASIA. It's not bad on itself. It's good for early game if you for example conquer mallaca, mollucas and then colonise autralia and america. However, for conquering Asia it is GARBAGE because most trade nodes aren't even connected to it or are by going upstream and for trade you always want to go downstream. From India only Bengal goes into Mallaca and it is by western China and indochina trade Nodes. Beijing and central china goes to Syberia so you are missing it by goimg Mallaca. Whole india except for the Bengal goes also into Lahore or Gurajat, long term into Persia, so by collecting in Mallaca you are missing out. We may compare collecting in mallaca with colonised America to collecting in Persia with conquered Asia but not the last one to collecting in Mallaca with conquered Asia as you'd miss out most of the trade income. Mallaca is only good for node to collect maybe till 1550 if you play in the region or focus colonial, after 1650 you'd want to collect in Persia. Everything depends on your goals and how much you want to expand but because you've mentioned the best node in Asia, then there is only Persia/Constantinopole or eventually Beijing if you won't expand that much and you are in the far east.
Zlewikk and "clean borders". Name a better duo.
27:22 So wholesome 😊
He forgor 💀
Have I never heard of this country. I used to play in India a lot. The only formables I knew of were Hindustan and Bharat
you forgot to conquer Hormuz. It is in Persia region.
damn, this color of sieged provinces by rajputana looks like it was sieged by rebels
Kekw
Can you do a Sun Never Sets On The Indian Empire.
szkoda że gra taka trudna bo naprawdę fajnie wygląda
Maybe you could try doing some more larp and nice borders etcetc. I think that its a shame how its 90 years in and you are already double everyones dev. Probably the reason why the succession game was really good
Może jakaś kampania w Afryce?
I have nothing to do while I have truce with so many nations... so let's attack the Ottomans with humiliation CB.
No widać, że prawdziwy Polak xD
Lore of I created PERSIA-INDIA GIGA EMPIRE to get that RARE EU4 Achievement momentum 100
finally got out of the poop colour, respect
I honestly prefer Raj color
Why not reform as horde Tibet: way cooler than barath or hindustan
This one is for another campaign ;)
Rajputana best colour for the map.
Pls don't close your forts when you have stronk economy it will increase your army tradion
1. At which point it was so strong?
2. Even if it was, it was all lvl 2 forts, which means that I would need to upfate all of them and build at least 3x of them to make ANY difference.
This is obviously not possible in case of this size of the country and completely not worth it. Not to mention that AT doesnt matter in SP when you play correctly
Nice echo, are you recording in jail or a basement? lol
I moved n into a new house, give me some time ;) check out my room here, you wont regret it www.reddit.com/r/eu4/comments/10drp9g/rate_my_new_photowall/?
That's a rare achievement? People must just not play in India then, despite it being one of the best regions in the game...
Yes, people dont play there ;)
Yes, its that people don't play there much, but it's more to do with the fact that "when they do" they pick Vijay, Bahamis, Jaunpur, Bengal, and somewhat Gujarat or Delhi. Malwa is decently sized but its surrounded by better starting options with a lot of religious diversity. Those who pick Malwa tend to be people who have already played a majority of these one's first, and so tend to be those who have played in India several times already, and we've already established these players are less common to begin with.
I play single player and have over 2k hours, but I've only played Jaunpur once and Bengal once and Gujarat once. This isn't many times; and my next one would be shia Bahamis anyhow.
@@ZlewikkTV I thought that because I had this achievement only a few weeks after Dharma released.
@@rowanmales3430 I've personally played even small countries like Gorkha, Mysore, Jaffna, Nagaur, etc.
@@TheRockhound119 From the sounds of it though, you play the India region a lot and enjoy it. Percentage wise, you are in the minority.
My personal problem with the Indian region is that runs are very similar. Fundamentally its a triangular peninsular, and there is a similarly sized large-ish starting blob in the North and East, with two in the South, surrounded by many much smaller nations. Each run is ultimately quite similar visually and in difficulty no matter which section of India you play in. And geography just outside India isn't good; either rainforest, desert, or mountains, with long straight coastlines or simply a large amount of little but bad terrain; limited interesting options unless you go colonialism one time. At least, this is my perception after 3 or 4 playthroughs with an Indian nation.
What this translates to is that after I do a run in India I have no desire to play there again with another Indian nation in a hurry because it'll be repetitive. To illustrate how much I don't like doing the same thing in the same place, here are my previous games in order.
Just finished a Great Horde into Golden Horde into Mongol Empire. Before that was a Bavaria into Germany. Before that was a Teutonic Order into Holy Horde. Before that was England into Great Britain. Before that was Papal States into Kingdom of God. Before that was Korea (into China and SEA region). And then Cusco into Inca. Castile into Spain. Songhai into whole of Africa. Bengal.
Of course, I have been considering playing Bahamis since 2 or 3 games ago (since I haven't been in India for a while or played a Shia nation yet), but the point is that for someone who needs variety each game India is much more "same-y" than any other region in the Old World except maybe East Africa (West Africa by contrast due to location has lots of potential gameplay options).
All my opinion of course.
I think you should have declared bankruptcy and gotten out of it for content and shut up the people who would comment about you having a million ducats of debt
I could, but I'm not playing any year longer so why lose time and prosperity? :v
@@ZlewikkTV yeah makes sense but I can just imagine people not getting that if you were to play for longer you could have gotten out of it. Just wanted to comment it for no reason at all