J35 Stealth Fighter, Zhuhai Airshow and US China Competition

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 280

  • @hrahman6666
    @hrahman6666 3 дні тому +64

    China is the number one in drone production ❤

  • @kittenlang333
    @kittenlang333 3 дні тому +30

    After watching the air show, this episode was icing on the cake. Thanks, Mr. Zha!

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому +1

      you're welcome!

  • @qinfugu2816
    @qinfugu2816 3 дні тому +66

    the Pentagon is a joke!!!😂😂😂

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому +2

      The Chinese pretending like they did not copy the F-22 F 35 is pretty funny

    • @johnchin1456
      @johnchin1456 2 дні тому +2

      Betcha think gender pronouns and drag queen teachers are cool, enjoy ur rainbow hysteria, the world is watching Ur clown show

    • @user-mhgu6om9mj2t
      @user-mhgu6om9mj2t 2 дні тому +8

      ​​@@treyborn2931looks like you are copying Chinese and EUropean designs now. Cope harder😂

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дні тому

      @@user-mhgu6om9mj2t So proud of Chinese copycats. Tell them to develop something of their own.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому

      @@user-mhgu6om9mj2t What programs are the US copying from China and Europe?

  • @donkeykong516
    @donkeykong516 3 дні тому +38

    China has the manufacturing capacity of scale, this applies to defense weaponry too

    • @Andy1805-y8w
      @Andy1805-y8w 2 дні тому

      There are sane people in the Pentagon and the intelligence agencies (former and current) who, to greater or lesser degrees, understand this. Unfortunately they are drowned out by political hacks who only care about power and money and who have noshed down heroic amounts of copium and dogmatically stick with their failed ideology.

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 3 дні тому +25

    Its worth mentioning that the J20 is as big as it is because it needs all that internal fuel to conduct long range air patrols over the chinese coastline. The US has discovered that their F35s and F22s are too short ranged to be useful and would either need extensive use of highly vulnerable tankers, lots of external tanks that make them non-stealthy or put US carriers dangerously close to the chinese coast.
    This was why they were trying to develop the NGAD which due to the usual issues with the US MIC, has gotten cancelled for cost overruns.

    • @hentaioverwhelming
      @hentaioverwhelming 3 дні тому

      The J-20 is also specialized for killing support aircraft like AWACS and air refuel tankers. The drone swarm mothership J-20, however, is going to rewrite how aerial warfare and combat air patrols are going to be handled.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому +1

      The f-35 is thick and Short because it's vertical takeoff and landing capable the j20 has the radar cross-section of a school bus because of its size .no aircraft ,in combat,will have enough fuel. It will have to refuel at some point that’s modern air combat logistics 101. you can’t have air dominance without air logistics isn’t that the purpose of having stealth aircraft? The US has a fleet of about 500 refueling tankers. China has about 10. if you’re going to copy anything from the US, I suggest you copy it logistics doctrine it may not be pretty but it’s what wins

    • @daniely500
      @daniely500 2 дні тому

      ​@treyborn2931 The US wants to project this air power to China & that logistics will be a nightmare. Knocking out an air tanker will be equivalent to knocking out many fighter planes.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 So why does the F35 have external fuel tanks then (which negate stealth) if they can just refuel all the time? You do realize refuel tankers can get shot down right? China doesn't need to copy anything from the US because China has a real defensive military - unlike the US "force projection" (aka imperialism).

    • @PhiloSurfer
      @PhiloSurfer 2 дні тому +4

      @@treyborn2931 As to the issue of sufficient fuel - the main point is that if you are defensive and patrolling your coastline, it will be more than sufficient. And when involved in a dogfight, you can always return to land when out of fuel. If you are attacking, from carriers out of harm's way, you will be out of fuel soon after you arrive for action.

  • @AnnieT369
    @AnnieT369 3 дні тому +42

    Very impressive.

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      Thank you! Cheers!

  • @stephenlock7236
    @stephenlock7236 3 дні тому +20

    To the US regime, any airplane with wings and wheels are an imitation of theirs.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      The US has built demonstrated and or used 7 different stealth platforms the since the 60s...Chinese would have you believe there's only 1 way to build stealth aircraft and that’s to copy whatever the latest stealth aircraft the US is using...lol😂 the J 35 copycat even has the sapphire glass sensor suite window on the bottom of the nose but it’s just a mock up. The J35 copycat does not have the same sensor suite pilot 3-D helmet but they glued the sapphire window to the bottom of the nose anyway... lol🤭 imitation is the sincerest form of flattery

    • @borgmorgan3003
      @borgmorgan3003 2 дні тому

      ​@@treyborn2931如果你是美国人,那么我要说的是,是的,J35就是我们在模仿学习最好的,甚至超越。如果你不是,希望你的国家不要模仿J20.不要模仿F35,否则会很丢脸😂😂😂

    • @CryptoRenegade-x3o
      @CryptoRenegade-x3o 2 дні тому +4

      Stop complaining treyborn, America is in decline and the whole world knows it, live with the facts

    • @CryptoRenegade-x3o
      @CryptoRenegade-x3o 2 дні тому +4

      Yes imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, like printing press a Chinese invention, also paper, ink, brush, gunpowder, pasta making which we use in our daily lives, definitely flattery to the Chinese

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому +4

      @@treyborn2931 Stealth was a US copy from the Soviets.

  • @parttimethinker7611
    @parttimethinker7611 3 дні тому +16

    American definitely has a lots of talented scientists. It’s not unusual to learn from them. We all go to school to learn from the more advanced levels folks. Fortunately, many former students became more advanced than their teachers. That’s a fact. It only natural for the Chinese scientists to make a name for themselves. Everyone in the world can make a name for himself or herself too. Let’s celebrate the advancement of everyone, instead of bitter jealousy. All these world power, the Persian Empire, Ottoman Empire, the Roman Empire, the British, French, the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, the Kingdom of Aksum, Kush, the Songhai..etc, were distributed throughout the world. It’s called humanity.

    • @sunshinesun121
      @sunshinesun121 День тому

      US loss many TALENTED Scientist from China. Now majority are from India. And they are more incline towards Financial services. Not Pure Scientific Researched nor Pioneering areas ( AI in New Materials, AI on Quantum Navigation, etc )

    • @rgloria40
      @rgloria40 День тому

      The problem is China has more by forcing people into STEM fields. In the United States, we have shortage of advance STEM degree. The United States has a policy of brain draining and raiding/luring the talent from other countries... We do however have tons of fake advance STEM people who are military veterans abusing the US military clearance as well as law enforcement . We have more liberal snowflakes. If you don't believe go to the Department of Education for data....which Trump wants to get rid of.

  • @GreenIvy3834
    @GreenIvy3834 3 дні тому +45

    Thank you Carl Zha, and TP. Highly impressive. Congratulations to China!
    💯🇹🇷🙌

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому +2

      Thanks for watching!

  • @ysoignoran1028
    @ysoignoran1028 18 годин тому +1

    Love to hear TP talk about techs in China, he is so knowledgeable and always has a great analysis backup with all solid data. Thanks Carl

  • @Saj14356
    @Saj14356 2 дні тому +10

    From Pakistan 🇵🇰 China J35 looks amazing 🤩 but I honestly don’t know its capabilities
    Love China from Pakistan 🇵🇰

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому +2

      no one knows it’s capabilities but somehow it’s better than the F 35

  • @moniruzzamankhan8218
    @moniruzzamankhan8218 2 дні тому +9

    Always Carl comes up with interesting topics.

  • @michaelchua3942
    @michaelchua3942 3 дні тому +31

    Great!

  • @sunlightsoul1222
    @sunlightsoul1222 3 дні тому +55

    Super power China we Indians support you and love you. From India

    • @mission9195
      @mission9195 3 дні тому +14

      Nice to see this comment!

    • @sitoudien9816
      @sitoudien9816 2 дні тому +3

      You're the only one.

    • @daniely500
      @daniely500 2 дні тому +4

      ​@@sitoudien9816That's what you hope. Hope is now a US strategy.

    • @Saj14356
      @Saj14356 2 дні тому +2

      How India is with USA 🇺🇸 now

    • @ijatpingrhyb
      @ijatpingrhyb 2 дні тому +3

      ​@@Saj14356hahaha you haven't kept up the real news. China and India have come to a agreement on their boarder dispute

  • @pbworld7858
    @pbworld7858 3 дні тому +39

    The Zhuhai Airshow was to give the US a message. FAFO.

    • @adonisstroke4323
      @adonisstroke4323 3 дні тому +3

      FAFO 😂😂😂

    • @pinawell
      @pinawell 3 дні тому +1

      @@adonisstroke4323 🤣

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      I don’t think anyone’s worried though. The J 35 is an unproven platform. What technology does it have? What’s its radar cross-section? who’s going to buy this aircraft? The F3 5 is the only combat proven fifth generation platform the SU 57 does not fly over Ukrainian airspace it's afraid of the patriot system the F 35 on the other hand defeated the S300-400 in true stealth fashion it was not a threat to the F 35

    • @xenuburger7924
      @xenuburger7924 День тому

      Bogdan is a Russian Chuck Yeager.

    • @melancholiusmonkey-mann5749
      @melancholiusmonkey-mann5749 5 годин тому

      Yes... On be half of Murica, Ihumbly apologize. To all my Chinese friends, being number one in thr world runs the risk of becoming an obsession. As we in the West weed out those elements that no longer serve us, as we become more insular, nationalistic and self focused, and as we ourselves realize where our open socierty, naivety, and adversely, our neuroticism has failed us, we hope to reengage the world on more realistic terms, with new understandings, new resolve, and a new attitude. One in which greed and capitlis5ic greed takes a back seat to national security, and pride. By virtue of our composition we will continue to innovate, but with a focus on securing IP and mass producing on our own. Finally, America has actual war experience. We've been fighting and waging war for the 35 years in some capacity or another. Enough experience in battle to know how it works in reality. If I were a warhawk bent on preserving US hegemony, I would go to war with China NOW, level her factories and set her industri capacity back a few decades. Dont wait untill she can effectively strike our interests around the world conventionally the way the US can strike hers now. Lets hope Trump has changed his view on Chyna.

  • @user-mhgu6om9mj2t
    @user-mhgu6om9mj2t День тому +2

    Great video Carl. I hope you have TP in future shows.

  • @joangeliajones8089
    @joangeliajones8089 3 дні тому +18

    Very informative, thank you from Colorado 😊

  • @iScoopyPal
    @iScoopyPal 3 дні тому +19

    Side by side, j35 wins in the sexy department! J35 is the new super model and f35, a tired old maid.

    • @othmanhassanmajid8192
      @othmanhassanmajid8192 2 дні тому

      f35 looks to be having midriff crisis...... too many big Macs crumbs in the avionics. 😂

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому

      sexy doesn't win battles ...the ff35 has a huge turbo fan right in the middle of it's fuselage that's why it's a bit thicc and when you combine that with stealth it gives you an advantage because no one else has this capability lessons learned from using the Harriet jump jet

    • @iScoopyPal
      @iScoopyPal 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 Stealth? Ask Iran. Israel F-35s were locked on radar and dared not enter Iranian airspace. They love to bomb Iran with passion but abort missions. You are living under a rock. Educate yourself.

  • @bobjack2381
    @bobjack2381 3 дні тому +13

    F 35 built for looking good but can't use in war because they always have technical problems

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      That's what the Iranian were hoping but they lost s300-400's and a nuclear research site because the F 35 works ...facts Don’t care about your feelings

    • @qiufusheng3058
      @qiufusheng3058 2 дні тому

      correct !

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 Right, F35 is already proven in combat, J35 is an unknown quantity, not even it will run.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 stop lying... no F35's crossed into IRan. Nor did they lose all their air defense nor nuclear research. where are the live videos? we know when US weapons are used to attack weak nations the videos are published. No social media either - like when Iran's ballistic missiles DID hit targets.

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому +4

      F35 is build for sucking insane amount of money into pockets of a few

  • @mhc3408
    @mhc3408 3 дні тому +11

    The car is a copy of the bicycle because the car has wheels.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      if it was an invisible car and I came out with an invisible bike ,which makes absolutely no sense, but.....I may have stole some technology to do it .

  • @multipolarworldorder
    @multipolarworldorder 3 дні тому +17

    The J35 stealth fighter - a new concept from China

  • @Issavibe3
    @Issavibe3 3 дні тому +25

    Those intakes shapes on the F-35 that people keep referring to, were actually invented by an Italian engineer back in the 80s . With that logic the F-35 is also a copy then

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому +8

      and all stealth are copies from a Soviet concept. Same with vertical take off planes too.

    • @cvashel
      @cvashel 2 дні тому

      cmon its a lot more than just the intakes though

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 2 дні тому

      The DSI (Diverterless Supersonic Intake) air intake was first used on the Chinese designed JF-17 low cost fighter jet in 2001.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому +1

      @@bobsmith3983The JF-17 went into production in 2003 the F-35 won it's production competition Against a rival stealth fighter in 2001 it was tested and flown years before that the Chinese j-10's were based on the f-16 the Chinese J-10B , first debuted in 2018 , it's Diverterless supersonic inlets are a direct copy of the F-16 variant block 30 Diverterless supersonic inlets which first flew back in 1996... let that sink in for a minute ...1996

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 8 годин тому

      @@Issavibe3 the f-35 uses DSI as a cheaper option ,it intended on using the variable geometry inlets the f-22 uses Wich can adjust their shape to optimize airflow depending on flight speed and conditions ...DSI on the f-35 were the second option ,they are less efficient than the f-22 VGI's and the main reason it can't achieve super cruise as it would have added another degree of complication to a platform that didn't need it ..the F 35 is practicallyi omniscient With it’s sensor suite which makes it deadlier than the F-22 in it’s air ground roll, the fact that the f-35 uses DSI doesn't mean the Italians invented a vertical takeoff and landing, super Sonic stealth fighter...lol 😂😂

  • @charleshixon3558
    @charleshixon3558 3 дні тому +9

    It's a good looking plane. I'm not sure its fair state its better than the F-35, especially since its relatively new and not much is known, but China has done the smart thing in tailoring their aircraft requirements to their geographical needs. Bigger planes mean more fuel and the ocean is a vast theatre.

  • @linc7075
    @linc7075 3 дні тому +20

    u.s does not have the materials and manufacturing capacity .... and they are in a nuclear debt problem

    • @ViceCoin
      @ViceCoin 2 дні тому +2

      Walmart economy.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому +1

      @@ViceCoin walmart and "software"

  • @TaiwanSausage
    @TaiwanSausage День тому +2

    russian flanker chief designer said there are only 2 types of 5th-generation stealth fighters in the world. one type is J-20. the other type is f-22 and its copycats( f-35, su-57, j-35).
    he said all fighter jets designers will agree with him that j-20 is the most innovative aerodynamic masterpiece. and its a very risky and out of box design that guarantee j-20 to be the fastest, the most agiled, the most fuel efficient 5th-generation stealth fighters in the world.

  • @Ju_pi_ter
    @Ju_pi_ter 3 дні тому +17

    f35 can even dive into ocean, yankee pilot need more swimming training though, LOL

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      that was the Brits. They forgot to take off the fan cover, and it dove into the sea… But the Chinese forgot to close the submarine hatch and their sub sanked… It happens.

    • @CryptoRenegade-x3o
      @CryptoRenegade-x3o 2 дні тому

      I suppose the Boeing 737 max also forgot to take off the fan covers 😂😂

    • @blang7017
      @blang7017 2 дні тому +2

      ​@@treyborn2931Regarding the closure of the submarine hatch that thing happened in Endia not China. Get your facts right. Lol. 😂😂😂

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 The Chinese sinking sub story was bogus and was debunked by many. The Japanese F-35 also like to dive into water. The US F-35's like to porpoise on the ground and eject it's pilot before destroying itself. It happens.

    • @othmanhassanmajid8192
      @othmanhassanmajid8192 2 дні тому

      Boeing has some interesting designs.... 737...multi personnel kamikazi liner drones with variable soft ware ability. 😊😊😊

  • @annaweiers2947
    @annaweiers2947 2 дні тому +1

    Fascinating, I recognize T P’s voice from a previous video on EV’s.❤🇨🇦

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  День тому

      TP is a great guest!

  • @syncmaster915n
    @syncmaster915n 2 дні тому +2

    Didn't know stealth technology originated by the Soviets. Great talks, thanks!

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому +1

      You're welcome!

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому

      Um...no.. a Russian scientist wrote a book on the theory of wave refraction ..that’s it… He never imagined that theory being applied to aircraft The US were the first to apply that theory to aircraft

  • @jameswkyip
    @jameswkyip 3 дні тому +4

    great info

  • @xushenxin
    @xushenxin 3 дні тому +3

    It is more like production flow management. You don't want to first 3 years 300%, then next 7 years sitting idle. A lot of J35 is for sale probably starting at year 3 or 5.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому

      Who are they selling the J 35 to … there's only a few nation states that need stealth aircraft It will never reach the production rate of the F 35.

  • @YSKWatch
    @YSKWatch 3 дні тому +5

    the theory/formula related to stealth fighter was created by Russian scientist.

  • @sunshinesun121
    @sunshinesun121 День тому +1

    China's AA missiles are Pretty GOOD. Cheaper and Equivalent in Performance than any US or Russian AA missiles. Plus with improved Radar and Target acquis ion system ........ Interesting .

  • @tashiyann3262
    @tashiyann3262 2 дні тому +1

    China has a huge manufacturing capacity on a large scale. This applies to defense weaponry, too, and it's very difficult for any other country on the planet to compete. I don't think America can.👍👍

  • @RexRecon
    @RexRecon 2 дні тому

    I love when TP comes on the show 😘

  • @6yikannatuna308
    @6yikannatuna308 2 дні тому

    Amazing analisys fram TP Huang👍👍👍👍

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      Glad you liked it

  • @pugster73
    @pugster73 3 дні тому +4

    One thing you didn't mention is that The smaller and lighter J35 is built to be used on a Aircraft carrier whereas the J20 is not, correct?

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому

      you are correct problem is though… China’s latest aircraft carrier is not nuclear powered so it has to hug the coastline and China famously does not have a fleet of air tanker refuelers that’s a problem

    • @miaorenfeng1
      @miaorenfeng1 14 годин тому

      @@treyborn2931 Were U.S. carriers nuclear-powered in WWII?😂

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 14 годин тому

      @ I'm not sure of the point your trying to make...but ...no,they didn't ...the entire fleet was limited by how much fuel they could carry but a nuclear powered fleet is practically limitless which is exactly my point c hi ina's carrier's will be tethered to the coast line which makes the j35 vulnerable because they can only go so far from their carrier's they will have to dodge BVR missiles all day

    • @miaorenfeng1
      @miaorenfeng1 4 години тому

      @@treyborn2931 TThe U.S. aircraft carrier during World War II was not nuclear-powered, but this did not prevent the U.S. aircraft carrier from sailing into Japanese waters.
      The operating range of an aircraft carrier does not depend on whether the aircraft carrier is nuclear-powered, but on the country's overall supply capabilities. This is why the United States has a large number of overseas military strongholds.
      In other words, what limits the range of operations of China's aircraft carrier is not because the aircraft carrier has no nuclear power, but because China has too few overseas military bases
      The U.S. aircraft carrier also needs to replenish a large amount of daily necessities and food, various ammunition, and aviation fuel. Without these supplies, the U.S. aircraft carrier is just a large toy.
      When the United States enters a war with a small country, the rate of material loss is not rapid. This weakness is not obvious. When a large-scale war breaks out with a big country, the combat materials of the aircraft carrier fleet will be rapidly depleted in large quantities. If the combat materials cannot be replenished in time, the fleet will lose combat capabilities. Will nuclear-powered aircraft carriers be different from conventional aircraft carriers by then?

  • @thabo.s_archives7756
    @thabo.s_archives7756 3 дні тому +3

    Hey Carl that's not the Su57 but a T-50 prototype of the Su57

  • @VincentTansoon
    @VincentTansoon 2 дні тому +1

    Carl Za Thank you for sharing with me about the China Air Show really want to learn more how effective in the world today. The world today is more worry about China Military Forces better than US Aircraft. I really appreciate you for sharing with me. Thank you so much for your time. People's around the world's can say copy from US but now is very real worry about China now.

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      Thank you for watching, Vincent!

  • @georgesampson2228
    @georgesampson2228 3 дні тому +4

    The US will now build a new 5-billion-dollar f35 using the j35 ideas.

    • @chrismanning1171
      @chrismanning1171 3 дні тому

      LOL, coming from a country that copies every other country's technology.

  • @CommonSenses101
    @CommonSenses101 6 годин тому

    You guys should watch J20 flight performance. Damn freaking impressive. It can flip and rotate 360 degrees.

  • @Ryan_Winter
    @Ryan_Winter 2 дні тому

    6:31 The F-35 was designed as a light multi-role fighter, it's size is one of the reasons why Switzerland bought 36 of them ( missing on your diagram at 3:06).
    Switzerland hides some of its fighters in hardened shelters, which are basically tunnels in mountains, and these installations can not accommodate much larger aircraft.
    In addition to that it is still war doctrine in Switzerland, to use certain parts of freeways as makeshift runways, and there is a size limitation to that as well.
    If "big" were always better most MIG's (Mikojan) airplanes would not exist, because the Sukhois are the big aerial supremacy aircraft, i.e. MIG-35 vs SU-35.
    Look at the F/A-18 and the F-5 Tiger II the Swiss air force has, they were chosen for their size.

  • @stefenleung
    @stefenleung 3 дні тому +3

    Why you want 2 types of stealth jet fighter? how about the 2 seated J20S? one of the seat isn't for a backup pilot. You have a man driving the aircraft, and the other man sending command to drones or other aircraft after collecting data at the front-line.
    The defensive weapons are another bright spot on the show. I'm not talking about the missile defend system. The anti-drone microwave system, is something that never seen before, and it makes sense when the modern warfare is all about manless machines.

    • @4411825
      @4411825 2 дні тому +1

      The reason you have two types of 5th gen fighters is the same as 4th gen fighters! The F-15/F-16, SU-27/MIG-29 is they may cover different mission sets and a lighter cheaper more producible light fighter! Russia 🇷🇺 will do the same when their SU-75 comes into production!

  • @leeway777
    @leeway777 День тому

    20:24 According to Xinzhi Song, a famous Chinese military weapon expert, the F35's radar cross-section is 0.1 square meters, whereas the J35's is less than 0.01 square meters. Not in the same order of magnitude. Now that China has stopped selling gallium to the US, F35s must wait on its radar.

  • @rafiwa8573
    @rafiwa8573 День тому

    I hope one day Eastern powers join hands, like India and China. Imagine the good stuff they can build.

  • @varvoom
    @varvoom 12 годин тому

    Don't Mess with China.

  • @tarose71
    @tarose71 3 дні тому +7

    I HAVE A QUESTION !!
    Where you have the overhead picture of the J35 & F35 side by side ... WHY does it look like the F35 went to a concert, got drunk & stoned & smashed to pieces, and then roadies put it back together with gaffer tape? What are all those marks on it that look like it was taped back together after someone broke it? 😂😂😂

    • @jetli740
      @jetli740 3 дні тому

      low IQ question

    • @cvashel
      @cvashel 2 дні тому

      radar absorbent material, kinda important for stealth jets

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому

      @@cvashel but that is always why the US "stealth" planes have horrible maintenance issues. Literally every time they fly their skin needs to be inspected and/or conditioned.

    • @cvashel
      @cvashel 2 дні тому

      @@Amidat ok? There’s a reason we still use 4th gen. Ram is hard and expensive to maintain but it’s essential to stealth

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 2 дні тому

      @@Amidat The F-35 can't fly in rain or thunderstorms or if the fuel is too warm (the fuel is used to cool the electronics). I remember a F-35 that froze like the Windows OS and the plane didn't respond to the pilot which resulted in him ejecting but the F-35 kept flying on until it ran out of fuel. They didn't know where it crashed for quite sometime. Imagine that happens when you about to engage an opposing fighter. You're dead.

  • @vladkorobov155
    @vladkorobov155 2 дні тому

    I would not be so sure that J-35 is superior to J-15.Because J-15 is a Flanker,and Flankers are the best.Thirty tons of thrust and airframe that is simply a work of art.
    What J-35 has,internal weapon bays?

  • @thndrngest
    @thndrngest 3 дні тому +1

    👍 !

  • @holybutterfly8495
    @holybutterfly8495 2 дні тому +1

    The US too scared of China and never talk about hot war with China yet. 😂

  • @mehmood3526
    @mehmood3526 2 дні тому

    We are literally experiencing next generation warfare

  • @kridadkool1319
    @kridadkool1319 2 дні тому

    1:31 Explains the East vs The West with 100 percent accuracy!!

  • @martiniiilim7497
    @martiniiilim7497 День тому

    Those are the real deal "Wolf Warrior."

    • @ysoignoran1028
      @ysoignoran1028 18 годин тому +1

      😂US wanted Chinese wolves warriors, now the Chinese gives them a bunch 😂

    • @martiniiilim7497
      @martiniiilim7497 12 годин тому

      @ysoignoran1028 🤣🤣🤣

  • @deletedaccount4282
    @deletedaccount4282 2 дні тому

    I mean Carl Zha can give an analysis on the social fear strike. It is in their playbook.

  • @tedchandran
    @tedchandran 6 годин тому

    Jai Hind. 285 billions of orders were signed in Zhuhai

  • @blucorona
    @blucorona День тому

    I thought J20 was meant to be the platform for their move to 6th generation fighter jet? Still got a lot of room for loyal wingman, AI, laser weapon.

  • @KKMan20xx
    @KKMan20xx 3 дні тому +2

    One thing though, why J-35? there are plenty of numbers between 20 and 35.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому

      I guess to troll the US.... Originally the prototypes were "31"

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      J in J-35 stands for 歼, which is Chinese for search and destroy. Hope that helps!

  • @lauriahonen2892
    @lauriahonen2892 3 дні тому +1

    ❤❤

  • @chaz4609
    @chaz4609 2 дні тому

    Jai Hind. J35 will be important component of the 285 billion Saudi purchase contract.

  • @bobsmith3983
    @bobsmith3983 2 дні тому

    The F-35 can't supercruise but the J-35 can.

    • @vladkorobov155
      @vladkorobov155 2 дні тому

      Supercruise is about two things.Airframe and engine power.F-35 is fat and horrible.And it has one engine that isn't good.
      J-35 is passably built.

  • @Freedom_from_imp
    @Freedom_from_imp 3 дні тому +2

    As impressive as some of the jets may be, are there reasons why they are named so similarly to the usa's jets? Are there some sort of strategic advantages in having them named that way. I am genuinely curious.

    • @4411825
      @4411825 3 дні тому

      Trolling!

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      J in J-35 stands for 歼, which is Chinese for search and destroy. Hope that helps!

    • @Freedom_from_imp
      @Freedom_from_imp 2 дні тому

      @@CarlZha got it. Thanks.

  • @ZenLH
    @ZenLH 10 годин тому

    👏👏👏👏👍

  • @ayonibrahim9985
    @ayonibrahim9985 День тому

    It looks like a more nimble version of the f 35, I honestly think it could potentially over take it.

  • @Pantsir-S1M
    @Pantsir-S1M 3 дні тому +2

    It's T-50 and not Su-57

  • @DailyBeatings
    @DailyBeatings 3 дні тому +4

    China is overproducing and collapsing at the same time. It's like Schrödinger's cat...🤣

    • @4411825
      @4411825 2 дні тому +1

      Russia 🇷🇺 is the second most powerful army in Ukraine 🇺🇦 but at the same time they will conquer all of Europe and the world 🌎 😂! Imperialism doesn’t lie sometimes but lies all of the time!

    • @qiufusheng3058
      @qiufusheng3058 2 дні тому

      Jealous idiot of China.

    • @minhloi4536
      @minhloi4536 2 дні тому

      Hello Bush
      ✌️✌️✌️

    • @minhloi4536
      @minhloi4536 2 дні тому

      @@DailyBeatings hello
      Donald Duck ⁉️🦆
      Stormy here.....
      🤣🤣🤣

  • @Desyo-wn7ib
    @Desyo-wn7ib 3 дні тому +3

    Regarding all this nonsense the Chinese are copying,
    There are universal things that everyone will do roughly the same, an airplane is not a vehicle that anyone can design whatever they want,
    Especially physiological, the stealth that needs to be fitted in the plane reduces the possibility of the design,
    What is this, also on a mathematical result you ara going to say that the Chinese copied 😂

  • @irimeyilmaz956
    @irimeyilmaz956 8 годин тому

    Why did they change the name to J-35. will only cause confusion with F-35 when discussing aircrafts.
    J-31 was already good name and unique name.
    China should start selling J-35 as soon as possible.
    Other countries are already planning to sell their stealth planes like South Korean and Turkey.

  • @โดเรม่อนรักชาติ

    คำว่า(ลอกเลียน)หรือว่า(ก้อปเขามา)มันเป็นคำพูดของ(คนโง่)และพวก(อิจฉา)คือมันไม่มีอะไรมาขัดขวาง(ความก้าวหน้า)ของคู่แข่งใด้(ทำได้แค่พูดเอาความสะใจ)ซึ่งมันไม่ได้ช่วยให้มัน
    (ดูมีคุณค่าขื้นเลย)

  • @hidongcucuk4756
    @hidongcucuk4756 День тому

    J35s have laser canons but not J20.

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 19 годин тому

    Chinese equipments are defective.... quality standard is irregular....but Cheap massive productions will give The Chinese as Edge

  • @christinecoughlan4699
    @christinecoughlan4699 2 дні тому

    Gracias Carl .

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      De Nada, Christiane!

  • @sara.cbc92
    @sara.cbc92 19 годин тому +1

    China couldn't up with a different name at least? Come on 35?

  • @tc-red9000
    @tc-red9000 2 дні тому +1

    Who cares it is a copy cat or not, Jack Ma said once, China makes it better😂

    • @othmanhassanmajid8192
      @othmanhassanmajid8192 2 дні тому

      You have to say it many times as ADD is a big thing in people with clothe ears😂

  • @phillipanderson9925
    @phillipanderson9925 3 дні тому

    Seams like it blows a lot of smoke

    • @chingtuckmeng1122
      @chingtuckmeng1122 3 дні тому

      f22, 35 do pot using afterburners

    • @phillipanderson9925
      @phillipanderson9925 3 дні тому +1

      @ I don’t understand what you’re trying to say sorry

    • @honeykhan914
      @honeykhan914 3 дні тому

      😂😂​@@phillipanderson9925

    • @honeykhan914
      @honeykhan914 3 дні тому

      ​@@phillipanderson9925he means due to twin engine j-35 will produce more smoke actually he tries to make fun because he is internally jealous and didn't want to believe china success.

    • @4411825
      @4411825 2 дні тому

      Plasma ionic stealth decoy 😉🫡

  • @fatdoi003
    @fatdoi003 3 дні тому +2

    you mean J35 replacing J11?? J15 is for navy...... J16 will stay on as multirole and EW

    • @wuhui
      @wuhui 3 дні тому +2

      J35A is for the air force J35 is for the navy. He is saying J35 will start replacing the old early variants of J15s. The latest variant of J15 is the J15T which is the Catobar capable variant. That will probably still remain in service for awhile longer. J15D is the naval electronic warfare or EW variant which is based on the air force version called.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 дні тому +1

      The new J15 T's will still be produced of course as they just got released officially. Same with J15D. J35 will play a different role.

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 2 дні тому +1

      @@wuhui The J-20s and J-35s will also replace the older fighters like the J-7 and J-8.

  • @rsiow2
    @rsiow2 3 дні тому +5

    Wouldn't the F35s be sitting ducks if they don't have parts?

    • @choifayue9848
      @choifayue9848 3 дні тому +1

      correct! lack of rare earth elements will bankrupt the Fs lol PEACE

  • @ltribley
    @ltribley 2 дні тому +1

    In the new era of warfare, large numbers of fighter aircraft can be a liability.
    Wny? Becase we are in the era of HYPERSONIC missiles, DRONES, and A2/AD air defense.
    China leads in hypersonic missile systems, drones, and air defense is likey a draw with Russia.
    In addition, becusse of advances in air defense, and air-to-air missiles, the days of close-in dog fights, and overhead bombing is a thing of the past.
    No matter how advanced or expensive the aircraft, they will deliver their missiles and glide bombs in "standback" position. This means out-of-range from the enemies air defense and fighter aircraft in order to escape.

  • @cvashel
    @cvashel 2 дні тому

    I love how china's response to the world accusing them of stealing us tech is to make a "stealth" fighter that looks exactly like the f-35, and instead of at least using an original name, they pick j-35 lmao. Then they use their propaganda to gaslight everyone into thinking it's not a copy because it has two smaller engines like that actually means anything.

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому

      J in J-35 stands for 歼, which is Chinese for search and destroy. Hope that helps!

    • @cvashel
      @cvashel 2 дні тому

      @@CarlZha who asked

  • @monkeyking-self-proclaimed7050

    How do they fare against Thai air force? At one point, Thai pilots whooop Chinese pilots.

  • @HaweyaAdhan
    @HaweyaAdhan 2 дні тому

    American weapons are effective when fighting guyz with only ak47 they are not match fighting their peers like Russia

  • @theresaleung823
    @theresaleung823 День тому

    Rolling blackouts.......

  • @goldenmonkey963
    @goldenmonkey963 3 дні тому +11

    To prevent Opium War 2.0 China needs 10000 of these J 35 and 100 aircraft carriers!

    • @yuugenr7549
      @yuugenr7549 3 дні тому +6

      China can make that easily

    • @tkh2944
      @tkh2944 3 дні тому +2

      They are already impervious to that ...
      That why so much frustration, despair, anxieties, sense of helplessness & whatever stress is upon those who want to bully them ! 😂

    • @goldenmonkey963
      @goldenmonkey963 2 дні тому

      @@tkh2944 It spell N A T O

  • @Zandiv
    @Zandiv 3 дні тому +2

    That is not the SU 37, its the T50, the prototype version of the SU 37 (which has a superior build quality, improved engines and is the production version)

  • @qake2021
    @qake2021 3 дні тому

    👍🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦➕️👍👌👌👌

  • @chunliangde
    @chunliangde 3 дні тому

    The lack of war experience is a shortcoming of the Chinese military, but there is nothing to be proud of if troops are ”too experienced“.

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дні тому

      Exactly, so why all the sabre-rattling at this Chyna airshow.

  • @TheAnalogKid2
    @TheAnalogKid2 2 дні тому

    copying: all is fair in weapons of war.

  • @ronlacher6818
    @ronlacher6818 День тому

    Beauty is only skin deep 🥴

  • @RahmatSeaddat
    @RahmatSeaddat 3 дні тому

    J20 is more like 4th generation but j35 may meet 5th generation criteria

    • @4411825
      @4411825 2 дні тому

      Why 🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дні тому

      Both are more like 3Gen when compared to F22 and F35.

    • @4411825
      @4411825 2 дні тому

      @ Why🤷🏾‍♂️The F-35 can’t even super cruise which is a criteria of a 5th gen fighter!

  • @Vermin.com-vm3
    @Vermin.com-vm3 2 дні тому

    China is like Russia ...paper tiger...with crappy equipment....all show no go . Stick to copying mobile phones with no warranty and crappy after sales service

    • @CarlZha
      @CarlZha  2 дні тому +2

      cope and seeth! lol

    • @holybutterfly8495
      @holybutterfly8495 2 дні тому

      How about Jesus a paper tiger or not ?

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 2 дні тому

      @@holybutterfly8495 your English is a paper tiger

    • @holybutterfly8495
      @holybutterfly8495 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 if you can’t understand my English then you do comments then you just totally stupid isn’t it right ? For the people who don’t speak good English it means a paper tiger then you are totally worse than the people who called stupid too.

  • @novaskies5538
    @novaskies5538 2 дні тому

    US is like a mean old man who thinks they're still 20 year olds.

  • @nkmeng
    @nkmeng 3 дні тому

    the most stupid thing about stealth is plane is stealth but bases and carrier is non -stealth

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      Tell that to the Iranians the F35 was flying over Iran with impunity doing whatever it wanted after defeating the S300- 400 With its stealth capabilities, they were ready, but still got caught by surprise

  • @אסףבר-ל7ר
    @אסףבר-ל7ר 3 дні тому

    J35
    זה מטוס ראוי,זה תלוי כמה הטייסים מאומנים.יש לו יתרונות וחסרונות.האם הוא הכי טוב? לדעתי לא.האם אפשר לנצח איתו מלחמה?בהחלט כן,כי זה תלוי בעלות, ותחזוקה.איכות הטייסים,וכמות המטוסים

  • @treyborn2931
    @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

    All I've been hearing is the J 35 looks prettier but pretty doesn’t win battles ...Funny how you don't mention that the f-35 is a vtoal platform which explains The thickness and length China doesn’t understand the necessity of such a platform because of their lack of experience ,they are just reproducing in mass stolen technology china only has about 10 refueling tankers again due to lack of experience in modern air combat .. tankers equals modern air combat logistics without logistics. You have nothing .China also does not have a modern air combat infrastructure the J 35 is carrier based but China’s most modern aircraft carrier is not nuclear powered so it’s not a deep water carrier it will only patrol the island chains the F35 Is perfect for Island hopping and is a combat proven platform anyway, is that electromagnetic catapult working yet

    • @NewAgeRanger
      @NewAgeRanger 3 дні тому +4

      The Chinese don’t need refueling. They are focused on defending their coastline and not overreaching. Their ICBMs is their long range deterrence. All their missiles can reach any US base in the area. If they need to attack the US mainland they will do so from a far. The Chinese coastline is the world’s most heavily defended coastline. Battle experience doesn’t guarantee victory. How many wars has the US been in since WW2? None, of which it has won. The future of modern warfare will be deadly and fought with robots, drones, AI, technology, and missiles. Guess who has the world’s largest missile and rocket systems and drones? China. Guess who has the largest production, manufacturing, and supply chains, and logistics? You can’t win wars without manufacturing, supply chains, and logistics. With all these technologies humans will only come in to pick up the bodies. Try not to be so bias in your thinking. This is how you get ppl killed for some rich banker sitting in his office in his suit and tie. Hopefully we, the 99% of ppl will wake up and stop the bs nonsense of these greedy elitists. It’s never enough $$$ for them. Finally, both the Chinese and Russians have shown they can accept the lost of millions of people and not blink an eye. America loses 10,000 and there will be mass antiwar protests in the streets.

    • @treyborn2931
      @treyborn2931 3 дні тому

      Lol... "Chinese don’t need refueling." Those are famous last words, Again, lack of experience ...word of advice it’s better to have it and not needed it than to need it and not have it in combat .if all china is interested in is defending it's coast line ... outstanding that means China is contained ...you can have all the missiles in the world. It doesn’t matter if you’re just contained to your own coastline. The US is not concerned about its coastline being hit ..manufacturing? America won World War II because of its manufacturing. It became the world's only superpower because of it, the US economy can switch to a manufacturing economy no problem... you cannot name one war where the United States lost on the battlefield… Lost in a court of public opinion yes but not on the battlefield ...Name one... America concerned about 10,000 casualties of course that’s a strength not a weakness… Losing millions and not blinking an eye is a weakness ...look at Russia just about 1 million casualties in two years that makes no sense. They are facing a future population crisis... agreed the future will be dominated by AI but it’s only a tool US battle doctrine never takes the human experience out of that loop

    • @choifayue9848
      @choifayue9848 3 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 f35 is old and your space station as well soon to be extinct, need I say more? PEACE

    • @4411825
      @4411825 2 дні тому +1

      Such nonsense!

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дні тому

      @@treyborn2931 Yeah, man, tell those CCP bots.

  • @AccordGTR
    @AccordGTR 2 дні тому

    You guys are amateurs 👎

  • @v.w.singer9638
    @v.w.singer9638 3 дні тому +2

    From reports, the F-35 has a combat availability rate of around 50%, meaning half are down for repairs or servicing at any one time. It would be interesting to see what the comparative stats are for the J-20 and J-35.

  • @inlustrismedia
    @inlustrismedia День тому

    19:59 for a laugh

  • @ronlacher6818
    @ronlacher6818 День тому

    Beauty is only skin deep 🥴