Learn the forehand fundamentals and let intuitive technical elements take care of themselves 🫴 www.intuitivetennis.com/products/the-intuitive-forehand-1-hour-27-minute-course
On forehand I now use compact swings, (was taught Federer style) not big huge loops anymore and the reason why I avoid big side looping going all around the ball as I used to do is because I don't want the wrist to get exposed to the g-forces stressloads of the ball which can happen sometimes if you get caught up in the middle of doing a big loop by a fast heavy ball you don't have time to fully swing around on. So I changed styles, now I just take the forehand back in a compact swing so I can get straight into the lag position more earlier with the ball rather than doing this big loop with the racquet and leaving the butt flying around all over the place (causing all this extra movement...) You don't want the butt to be still moving all over the place when the ball is in range..
Excellent video, as always. An interesting point is that top level players many times have no idea how they hit a forehand. They just learned as kids the proper fundamentals, and without realizing it, they acquired a certain "style". I have talked to top level players here in Chile, some would be equivalent to 5.0 or 6.0 nationally ranked players, and ask them what grip they use, and they have to pick up their racquet, and hold it how they normally do in order to describe their grip. They're never worried about which bevel or which part of the hand. And many don't pay attention to how they do their backswings. They just do it. In a nutshell, they never copied anyone and have no idea of the nuances of their stroke mechanics. I think Federer once said he had no idea how he held the racquet, he just did it. Also it depends on which racquet they used as a junior. Guys like Connors, McEnroe, Sampras or Agassi, started out with heavier wood racquets, ergo their simpler, straightforward style. I'm sure Alcaraz never touched a wooden classic, and started out with a featherweight graphite. Ergo, his more "charismatic" backswing. Technique follows technology. As carved skiis changed the way we ski, featherweight graphite with poly strings change the way we hit a forehand.
@@sergiosimbula 100%. I learned with Jimmy Connors very heavy racket that my Dad bought for me from a Big5 clearance when I was 12. A short skinny kid like me had no choice but to use a classic compact swing to have any chance at even hitting the ball back over the net. Maybe I should use the same racket to teach my nephews how to play lol.
i don’t quite agree with this. this what i hear a lot from older people - especially club level players. i think that it is other way around - the technology was changing **concomitant to the biomechanical changes that were /already taking place in the game/. i talked to representatives from Wilson about this. i was trained in the 2000s and i have much longer takebacks from older county /club players. older club players always seem to get injured - arm and elbow injuries that require strapping etc. it always seemed completely obvious to me that because of their short swings and lack of rotation through the trunk, they simply weren’t creating momentum toward the ball - and the energy of the oncoming ball was being transferred through their racquet right into their arm. i never experienced pain in my arms - not once - and i trained up to ten hours a day, with breaks, for years. i cringe looking at the technique of older players. you can see all the problems and how the injuries will inevitably come. now, i have tried using wooden racquets - some highly preserved at a club near my university. i could still hit my strokes and the extra weight didn’t really bother me. the racquets were strung with gut. the big difference, i found, was that those kind of strings don’t ‘grip’ the ball like the Luxilon big banger strings that i grew up with and (yes) you will make more errors. older players /people are always obsessed with technology but don’t seem to notice, or are unwilling to recognise, just how much tennis has changed biomechanically.
I am new to tennis but I played squash for years before. My squash coach would never force a swing on his students (except a few fundamentals). When we first started, he always told us to find our own natural swing. He only kept asking us to just keep our arms relaxed and never clutch the racket tightly! And he also said the same applies to all racket sports.
It's actually something you can't force. During practice I always wanted to immitate Rafa's forehand style,. But when I play matches where I don't have time to think about the swing, it natually becomes a lot more similar to Novak's style which is what Nick described as the simpler form.
After watching and digging a lot of tennis video coaching online, you are the best to me. You cover the perspective no online coach out there has explained. Amazing knowledge! Tks so much.
For some time I have done tactical analysis on TennisTroll channel and during that time, by sheer data, I discovered that "forehand paradox", that players would make more unforced errors with their stronger shot. This is probably due to 3 reasons: 1) they use the forehand more often (I only counted absolute numbers, not relatives) 2) they run around their backhand and so have less time or are less well positioned to execute the forehand 3) they take more risk with it, especially when running around because they're out of position or they think they need to strike a killer shot. You're saying it's a more complex shot. You're the expert - so I won't argue with that. Just adding my 3 cents.
Can I just say watching you coach and teach things like Take Back makes me realise how badly I've been coached. Not a single time has my coach said to me to develop my take back on forehand. I've been hitting forehands without one and doing ok but I understand the importance of it and I'm determined to develop mine thanks to you. Your a credit to UA-cam Nikola.
How Interesting. In Sampras' book, he explained how he targeted Jim Courier's "fearsome forehand", his words. Because he identified Courier took a long swing on return of serve so he used the serve out wide to open up the court and expose Courier's relative lack of speed, and get Courier frustrated. I enjoy players talking about the tactical side, doesn't happen often enough because in general sports media not interested in that stuff.
The best ground stroke is the one that gives you, and you alone, the most precision and depth, with the lowest unforced error rate. I have learned to play using the continental grip and a wooden racquet. As the years went by, I constantly adapted my grip and ground strokes to "gel" with the ever changing racquets and balls. Right now, I am using anything between eastern and semi-western, depending on surface and opponent (low, flat strokes to high bounce, heavy topspin).
What a great video! Understanding the difference between style and fundamentals is so crucial. As a baseball coach, that video even help me in that regards! Thx!
Being 41 and having learned tennis in the late 80s and early 90s, I was always liking the forehand of Andre Agassi and later Yevgeny Kafelnikov. In my younger days, I think my forehand was a mixture of both (style wise not quality). After quitting from competitive tennis for almost 25 years and starting again at 39, I fixed some parts based on recreational tennis players like Mark Sansait, but also Djokovic and many WTA players regarding forehand preparation and keeping the racquet head up like the basic modern forehand. The loop gets really behind my body. It is my best shot by far, probably somewhere 4.5 level, but still I need to remind myself to keep the arm more relaxed and to really let the follow through happen instead of actively stopping the movement. The result of these issues is losing a lot of energy while playing and getting more tired than my opponents.
So happy to hear you mention Fernando Gonzalez, his name strangely seems to be omitted often when discussions arise about forehands. My opinion... Worst forehands to try to emulate... Medvedev, Tiafoe, Kachanov, among others of course.
when hitting againt the wall, if i get bored, i like to try to copy medvedevs forehand. It usually ends up with the ball going over the wall or into the floor
Another really good video. The title Don’t Copy the NEXT GEN Forehand fits me. I'm older. I use the McEnroe forehand where the racquet starts low. Not the most powerful, but simple.
The next gen forehand feels very natural to me. I like the crooked arm, and the loose wrist, and a very natural swing path. I am a more advanced rec player probably, but for me its actually really nice.
Good vid. I recently opted for a lighter racket so that I could swing a bit quicker. So far it has helped. My forehands are more accurate and more consistently in the court. However, I did lose a bit of power that I had with my heavier racket. But at my age and low recreational level, power is not so important. I'm trying to keep it as simple as I can while actually getting to and doing the "lag" phase of the swing -- and so far I'm happy with how I'm hitting my forehands now. I've found that the most important thing for me seems to be to keep my eye on the ball through contact. Taking my eye off the ball is my most common mistake. But when I watch the ball all the way into my racket, then I almost always hit the shot where I want to hit it. I've also experimented with a bit more of a Western grip, which also seems to help. Thanks for your tips and analyses.
"I recently opted for a lighter racket so that I could swing a bit quicker." A lighter racquet will be even more head heavy. It's like trying to swing with a hammer. So, actually, you went backwards. You think! you swing better, because being lighter, you can push it easier from the wrist. Hello tennis elbow!
That's why I just copied Holger Rune's forehand which is super easy. No complex takebacks or high arms. Just a simple straight takeback with point of the racket aiming at the sky and then a whip. Samsonova has kinda similar motion but her racket on takeback is not 90 degrees like Rune's.
Rune's takeback isn't nextgen and is easy to limítate it in theory. Resembles much of Nole's tenets but Rune's achieved even less independent use of his arm. When confortable and emergency shots, his right arm is pretty much a whole unit rotating at once. He keeps the same arm elbow structure from the takeback till the finish: upper body and arm like "welded". Little use of flick of the wrist or a volitional motion. Little of delay in his arm too= Lots of advantages and stability in his impact. In lower balls he just needs to lower rather not only knees but a straight chest to keep his arm structure the same and avoid using much of his wrist. The famous lag is produced naturally out of pure centrifugal force bc his upper body that is "welded" to his arm bc of pure acceleration makes his chest goes slightly first followed by his "immobile" arm structure type 90° with his racquet face pointing to the sky simultaneously with his trunk side. To accomplish it, the shoulder can't be completely loose once he's set up the racquet. That it cannot act as a loose free pivot. Has to have some kind of movement restriction. There are really a few forehands like this. Nole is rather similar. Roger had elements of it too. Most players use a short shoulder internal rotation instead of pure massive shoulder abduction because of the different alignments of the upperbody parts. If you search youtube there's beautiful anatomically descriptive demonstrations of this massive upperbody power in many sports that used the arms including tennis and the very few ones that have it. But nothing is so easy. Requieres to develop first new neuromuscular connections to feel it and above all sync it well.
I would disagree with the premise that next-gen forehands are as good as modern forehands. They are of course great, simply due to the fact that they are being used by exceptional athletes. But I don't think they are optimal. There is this great blog called "a thread of order" who describes why the next-gen Forehand is less reliable in great detail. It simply comes down to too many moving parts. The wrist becomes pivotal to the movement, but the wrist is also the weakest link in the kinetic chain. The windup is also more complicated and thus takes longer. This is reflected in the worse returning abilities of many new gen players - they just cant react to fast serves in time with their long-winded swing. You are also working against gravity by starting your swing with your raquetface horizontally to the ground, at least compared to the much simpler modern forehand swingpath. It can also be noted that Federers swing during his prime was notably simpler and closer to a del-Potro like simple modern forehand.
The time it takes to setup and meet the ball seems to have a lot to say about unforced errors. Given a strong opponent that takes away time implies that, swing efficiency is paramount!!!
@@ccsdk I discovered that for myself too, after my club got promoted to a higher league. Against better players who play with pace I - and my long ass swing- found myself constantly pushed for time, and thus hitting the ball a lot less cleanly than I was used to. Of course the level is far far lower.
Great video, similar had Tomaz from Feeltennis, the point is that men pros have got extremely strong muscles and very flexible meaning stretchable tendons by playing tennis from early youth many hours a day, look at wta forehand e.g. Halep - longer backswing dropping racket on edge, on the contrary Raducanu trying more ATP forehand ofcourse excellent, however, many Times is lacking power in decisive points especially on slower surfaces against players with wta forehands, for us mortal men on recreational level is probably better to play wta forhand and use atp like when ball comes back fast like on hard surface or when returning, otherwise I find more useful to go with longer C shape backswing with having much easier relaxed arm while racket is halfway being supported with non-dominant arm, similarly is better for me to use longer pathway on serve where I automatically obtain racket head drop, as I don't have power and indurance to keep jumping 2 meters into court after hitting serve like superhumen pros do, generally when I watch even young guys who play competetively, and pritty well, I would say that their main problém is that they immitate pros in most aspects, you can't do that unless playing and training 6 hours a day, sleeping 9 hours at night, and having not other demanding tasks to do
lol please don't copy wta. Stay on same side of body and do the Novak or Stan if anything. And on returns if you're taking it early so it's a block return. Pretty much no take back 👍✌️
Thank you you are very observative to the real problems. I argue with my coach because she always says to open further back and i since i copy and is less work to not open so far had desbielief Thanx again
Yep.... I have a habit of finishing my forehand with racket on the side of my arm instead of over the shoulder like a Kyrios .... except I'm under 6ft and not as athletic....had to unlearn that.
I can’t remember if you mentioned Kyrgios and Thiem. Their forehands are a bit extreme from my point of view. It’s kinda a mix of the two styles you talk about in this clip. High elbow during the take back and racket parallel to the ground & pointing forward, but they generate a lot of speed. What’s your take on that?
Check out Tom Allsop's channel. But seems to me he is right - you can use a next gen like prep and then just supinate to get closer to the lag position. Without actively supinating (external rotation) during the drop / swing - you are going to be able to hit with slower swings. I am pretty sure Fed can play mini tennis with a kid - this is how he would do it.
Hi. Thank you for your videos. Can you share how to vary spin? It's easier for me to hit topspin on the forehand than to hit flat. Is it important to vary?
Ok. Essentially, players do still have the option to copy, especially the Zverev, and Federer options, but they would have to accept the risks involved. I do wonder if the rackets they use, or grew up using may have also influenced how their technique developed.
Just because you need lag doesn't mean you need that crazy lag like Roger and Rafa at recreational level. Just let the gravity do its job for you, and focus on what's in front of you.
I have a weak arm I am not able to generate good racket speed. My racket goes towards side when drooping the racket. Plz advise should i change my take back towards fence to generate high racket speed
You don’t create the lag by moving your racket back with a wrist movement!! The lag is just the result of a relaxed wrist. It just happens when you accelerate the racket forward with a loose wrist.
When I grip the racket at the end like Borg I can hit the ball in wiper swing with more power and safety than I would grip it in normal, I don't know why? Is it a stance thing? Open and closed?
@@djp3525 a lot of experts agree with me too trying to hit like a pro doesn’t suit everyone good luck if you can hit like Nadal with a full western grip
Yeah great vid, I agree with not copying the next gen forehand, I was hitting rubbish for a few weeks so I gave it a go and weirdly I hit alright the first time out but it went downhill from there. Plus I found that purely through the profile of the swing meant that I was straightening out the natural angles on the court and it's a worse forehand to defend with, maybe that was just the way I was executing it, from medium paced ball I could hit well but too straight, from a low fast paced shot couldn't block through it so I only had a slice to defend with.
Nik…can I send you video clip of me playing tennis to evaluate and critique? I want to improve without wasting time. Feel like ive hit dead end as “self taught”. $ isn’t an issue.
Good video but I have to disagree with the part where you said that these players have always played the same way as they do now. They are evolving, just look at the djokovic how he played his forhend lets say in one of his first apparences in grand slam against safin in australia( thers a video of it) compared to the forhend he hits today.
Thanks for the like...it took me 10 years to realize I should have been playing like Gonzalez all the time. I am now.44 playing great since I retire from pro. 😂
@@strongbrain3128 at 4.0 sure. I feel comfortable hitting eastern or semi. But if im playing a strong 4.5/5.0 it's to my benefit to stay steady with a quick Novak setup. Cheers
@@maxpowers4436 it's Hoor-catch, not Her-catch. Nick's pronounciation was far enough that I needed to pause for 3 seconds to figure out who he's talking about :D Sounds like he had it spelled wrong on that piece of paper, that's why it was so off, at least that's my guess
This guy shouldn’t talk about forehand at all. He has such a bad technique…and this is so unimportant detail he mention!! Really… who is putting this comments here? „great video” - paid/fake accounts?. Please start playing correct technique yourself. Check any video of Patrick Mouratouglue and you will see whats important and whats not… so borring story here
@@rusty935 fraud at teaching? Your okey? Videos are free go and listen… that is all you have to do, and technique is repeatable by most pro tennis players.
Learn the forehand fundamentals and let intuitive technical elements take care of themselves 🫴 www.intuitivetennis.com/products/the-intuitive-forehand-1-hour-27-minute-course
On forehand I now use compact swings, (was taught Federer style) not big huge loops anymore and the reason why I avoid big side looping going all around the ball as I used to do is because I don't want the wrist to get exposed to the g-forces stressloads of the ball which can happen sometimes if you get caught up in the middle of doing a big loop by a fast heavy ball you don't have time to fully swing around on.
So I changed styles, now I just take the forehand back in a compact swing so I can get straight into the lag position more earlier with the ball rather than doing this big loop with the racquet and leaving the butt flying around all over the place (causing all this extra movement...) You don't want the butt to be still moving all over the place when the ball is in range..
Excellent video, as always.
An interesting point is that top level players many times have no idea how they hit a forehand. They just learned as kids the proper fundamentals, and without realizing it, they acquired a certain "style".
I have talked to top level players here in Chile, some would be equivalent to 5.0 or 6.0 nationally ranked players, and ask them what grip they use, and they have to pick up their racquet, and hold it how they normally do in order to describe their grip. They're never worried about which bevel or which part of the hand. And many don't pay attention to how they do their backswings. They just do it.
In a nutshell, they never copied anyone and have no idea of the nuances of their stroke mechanics. I think Federer once said he had no idea how he held the racquet, he just did it.
Also it depends on which racquet they used as a junior. Guys like Connors, McEnroe, Sampras or Agassi, started out with heavier wood racquets, ergo their simpler, straightforward style. I'm sure Alcaraz never touched a wooden classic, and started out with a featherweight graphite. Ergo, his more "charismatic" backswing.
Technique follows technology.
As carved skiis changed the way we ski, featherweight graphite with poly strings change the way we hit a forehand.
Well said Eric
@@sergiosimbula 100%. I learned with Jimmy Connors very heavy racket that my Dad bought for me from a Big5 clearance when I was 12. A short skinny kid like me had no choice but to use a classic compact swing to have any chance at even hitting the ball back over the net. Maybe I should use the same racket to teach my nephews how to play lol.
I like this comment 👍.
i don’t quite agree with this. this what i hear a lot from older people - especially club level players. i think that it is other way around - the technology was changing **concomitant to the biomechanical changes that were /already taking place in the game/. i talked to representatives from Wilson about this. i was trained in the 2000s and i have much longer takebacks from older county /club players.
older club players always seem to get injured - arm and elbow injuries that require strapping etc. it always seemed completely obvious to me that because of their short swings and lack of rotation through the trunk, they simply weren’t creating momentum toward the ball - and the energy of the oncoming ball was being transferred through their racquet right into their arm.
i never experienced pain in my arms - not once - and i trained up to ten hours a day, with breaks, for years.
i cringe looking at the technique of older players. you can see all the problems and how the injuries will inevitably come.
now, i have tried using wooden racquets - some highly preserved at a club near my university. i could still hit my strokes and the extra weight didn’t really bother me. the racquets were strung with gut. the big difference, i found, was that those kind of strings don’t ‘grip’ the ball like the Luxilon big banger strings that i grew up with and (yes) you will make more errors. older players /people are always obsessed with technology but don’t seem to notice, or are unwilling to recognise, just how much tennis has changed biomechanically.
I am new to tennis but I played squash for years before. My squash coach would never force a swing on his students (except a few fundamentals). When we first started, he always told us to find our own natural swing. He only kept asking us to just keep our arms relaxed and never clutch the racket tightly! And he also said the same applies to all racket sports.
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm in the middle of retooling my forehand and this understanding is very valuable. Swing efficiency is paramount!
Amazing the amount of info in 10 minutes! And you get right to it. Thank you for that.
It's actually something you can't force. During practice I always wanted to immitate Rafa's forehand style,. But when I play matches where I don't have time to think about the swing, it natually becomes a lot more similar to Novak's style which is what Nick described as the simpler form.
After watching and digging a lot of tennis video coaching online, you are the best to me. You cover the perspective no online coach out there has explained. Amazing knowledge! Tks so much.
🙏🙏
Agree, especially for recreational players djkovic style is more suitable than Federer.
This is the exactly the video I needed! Thank you and well done!
For some time I have done tactical analysis on TennisTroll channel and during that time, by sheer data, I discovered that "forehand paradox", that players would make more unforced errors with their stronger shot. This is probably due to 3 reasons: 1) they use the forehand more often (I only counted absolute numbers, not relatives) 2) they run around their backhand and so have less time or are less well positioned to execute the forehand 3) they take more risk with it, especially when running around because they're out of position or they think they need to strike a killer shot. You're saying it's a more complex shot. You're the expert - so I won't argue with that. Just adding my 3 cents.
Can I just say watching you coach and teach things like Take Back makes me realise how badly I've been coached. Not a single time has my coach said to me to develop my take back on forehand. I've been hitting forehands without one and doing ok but I understand the importance of it and I'm determined to develop mine thanks to you. Your a credit to UA-cam Nikola.
How Interesting. In Sampras' book, he explained how he targeted Jim Courier's "fearsome forehand", his words. Because he identified Courier took a long swing on return of serve so he used the serve out wide to open up the court and expose Courier's relative lack of speed, and get Courier frustrated. I enjoy players talking about the tactical side, doesn't happen often enough because in general sports media not interested in that stuff.
The best ground stroke is the one that gives you, and you alone, the most precision and depth, with the lowest unforced error rate.
I have learned to play using the continental grip and a wooden racquet. As the years went by, I constantly adapted my grip and ground strokes to "gel" with the ever changing racquets and balls.
Right now, I am using anything between eastern and semi-western, depending on surface and opponent (low, flat strokes to high bounce, heavy topspin).
Thank you very much. Now I came to understand why my forehand swing is tough to achieve enough swing lag to generate enough power.
What a great video! Understanding the difference between style and fundamentals is so crucial. As a baseball coach, that video even help me in that regards! Thx!
Being 41 and having learned tennis in the late 80s and early 90s, I was always liking the forehand of Andre Agassi and later Yevgeny Kafelnikov.
In my younger days, I think my forehand was a mixture of both (style wise not quality). After quitting from competitive tennis for almost 25 years and starting again at 39, I fixed some parts based on recreational tennis players like Mark Sansait, but also Djokovic and many WTA players regarding forehand preparation and keeping the racquet head up like the basic modern forehand. The loop gets really behind my body.
It is my best shot by far, probably somewhere 4.5 level, but still I need to remind myself to keep the arm more relaxed and to really let the follow through happen instead of actively stopping the movement.
The result of these issues is losing a lot of energy while playing and getting more tired than my opponents.
Kafelnikov forehand looks quite stiff so I don't recommend it to anyone
Same. I learned the Agassi forehand and Kafelnikov backhand. A few years ago, I was doing higher takebacks, similar to Djokovic on both sides.
Mark sansait has some of the ugliest groundstrokes in tennis
Hearty congrats on the 200k subscribers Nick
Thank you. Might do something not sure yet…
So happy to hear you mention Fernando Gonzalez, his name strangely seems to be omitted often when discussions arise about forehands. My opinion... Worst forehands to try to emulate... Medvedev, Tiafoe, Kachanov, among others of course.
when hitting againt the wall, if i get bored, i like to try to copy medvedevs forehand. It usually ends up with the ball going over the wall or into the floor
Creeping on 200k Nick! Well done
Another really good video. The title Don’t Copy the NEXT GEN Forehand fits me. I'm older. I use the McEnroe forehand where the racquet starts low. Not the most powerful, but simple.
So long as you’re consistent, that’s the most important thing.
nice. open door close door. good way to teach someone quickly and have fun
The next gen forehand feels very natural to me. I like the crooked arm, and the loose wrist, and a very natural swing path. I am a more advanced rec player probably, but for me its actually really nice.
Excellent tip. Thanks for saving me the headache of a new forehand!
🙏
Omg , such a super valuable video !!!!!! THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH FOR THIS INFORMATION !!!!!
wich raquet are you using now nick ? pure drive no more ?
Good vid. I recently opted for a lighter racket so that I could swing a bit quicker. So far it has helped. My forehands are more accurate and more consistently in the court. However, I did lose a bit of power that I had with my heavier racket. But at my age and low recreational level, power is not so important. I'm trying to keep it as simple as I can while actually getting to and doing the "lag" phase of the swing -- and so far I'm happy with how I'm hitting my forehands now. I've found that the most important thing for me seems to be to keep my eye on the ball through contact. Taking my eye off the ball is my most common mistake. But when I watch the ball all the way into my racket, then I almost always hit the shot where I want to hit it. I've also experimented with a bit more of a Western grip, which also seems to help. Thanks for your tips and analyses.
Agreed! Eyes on the ball is the key to cleaner contact.
"I recently opted for a lighter racket so that I could swing a bit quicker."
A lighter racquet will be even more head heavy. It's like trying to swing with a hammer. So, actually, you went backwards.
You think! you swing better, because being lighter, you can push it easier from the wrist. Hello tennis elbow!
What's with the all white racket? Did you spray paint your Babolat to avoid advertising for them?
Great resolution. The colours are vibrant.
Hello Nic
Great tennis journey day after day!!!
I hope ur dreams are loaded with winning forehands .. 😅
My forehand style is Monica Niculescu
Good joke- you may be very good in squash :-)
That's why I just copied Holger Rune's forehand which is super easy. No complex takebacks or high arms. Just a simple straight takeback with point of the racket aiming at the sky and then a whip.
Samsonova has kinda similar motion but her racket on takeback is not 90 degrees like Rune's.
Rune's takeback isn't nextgen and is easy to limítate it in theory.
Resembles much of Nole's tenets but Rune's achieved even less independent use of his arm. When confortable and emergency shots, his right arm is pretty much a whole unit rotating at once. He keeps the same arm elbow structure from the takeback till the finish: upper body and arm like "welded".
Little use of flick of the wrist or a volitional motion.
Little of delay in his arm too= Lots of advantages and stability in his impact. In lower balls he just needs to lower rather not only knees but a straight chest to keep his arm structure the same and avoid using much of his wrist.
The famous lag is produced naturally out of pure centrifugal force bc his upper body that is "welded" to his arm bc of pure acceleration makes his chest goes slightly first followed by his "immobile" arm structure type 90° with his racquet face pointing to the sky simultaneously with his trunk side.
To accomplish it, the shoulder can't be completely loose once he's set up the racquet. That it cannot act as a loose free pivot. Has to have some kind of movement restriction.
There are really a few forehands like this. Nole is rather similar. Roger had elements of it too.
Most players use a short shoulder internal rotation instead of pure massive shoulder abduction because of the different alignments of the upperbody parts.
If you search youtube there's beautiful anatomically descriptive demonstrations of this massive upperbody power in many sports that used the arms including tennis and the very few ones that have it.
But nothing is so easy. Requieres to develop first new neuromuscular connections to feel it and above all sync it well.
What racket is that Coach Nik?
What racket is that?
I would disagree with the premise that next-gen forehands are as good as modern forehands. They are of course great, simply due to the fact that they are being used by exceptional athletes. But I don't think they are optimal. There is this great blog called "a thread of order" who describes why the next-gen Forehand is less reliable in great detail. It simply comes down to too many moving parts. The wrist becomes pivotal to the movement, but the wrist is also the weakest link in the kinetic chain. The windup is also more complicated and thus takes longer. This is reflected in the worse returning abilities of many new gen players - they just cant react to fast serves in time with their long-winded swing. You are also working against gravity by starting your swing with your raquetface horizontally to the ground, at least compared to the much simpler modern forehand swingpath. It can also be noted that Federers swing during his prime was notably simpler and closer to a del-Potro like simple modern forehand.
The time it takes to setup and meet the ball seems to have a lot to say about unforced errors. Given a strong opponent that takes away time implies that, swing efficiency is paramount!!!
@@ccsdk I discovered that for myself too, after my club got promoted to a higher league. Against better players who play with pace I - and my long ass swing- found myself constantly pushed for time, and thus hitting the ball a lot less cleanly than I was used to. Of course the level is far far lower.
Interesting point on the younger generation being not as great at returning based on this
@@fillitup100 also their much lower average racquet swingweight
Wouldn’t the horizontal racquet face allow you to swing from back to front more easily though, making it easier to hit the ball?
Congratulations on 200k nick
Thank you
Great video, similar had Tomaz from Feeltennis, the point is that men pros have got extremely strong muscles and very flexible meaning stretchable tendons by playing tennis from early youth many hours a day, look at wta forehand e.g. Halep - longer backswing dropping racket on edge, on the contrary Raducanu trying more ATP forehand ofcourse excellent, however, many Times is lacking power in decisive points especially on slower surfaces against players with wta forehands, for us mortal men on recreational level is probably better to play wta forhand and use atp like when ball comes back fast like on hard surface or when returning, otherwise I find more useful to go with longer C shape backswing with having much easier relaxed arm while racket is halfway being supported with non-dominant arm, similarly is better for me to use longer pathway on serve where I automatically obtain racket head drop, as I don't have power and indurance to keep jumping 2 meters into court after hitting serve like superhumen pros do, generally when I watch even young guys who play competetively, and pritty well, I would say that their main problém is that they immitate pros in most aspects, you can't do that unless playing and training 6 hours a day, sleeping 9 hours at night, and having not other demanding tasks to do
lol please don't copy wta. Stay on same side of body and do the Novak or Stan if anything. And on returns if you're taking it early so it's a block return. Pretty much no take back 👍✌️
I just focus on what I'm trying to do with the ball. If I want topspin vs flat vs slice the motion I have to make is different.
Thank you you are very observative to the real problems. I argue with my coach because she always says to open further back and i since i copy and is less work to not open so far had desbielief
Thanx again
Yep.... I have a habit of finishing my forehand with racket on the side of my arm instead of over the shoulder like a Kyrios .... except I'm under 6ft and not as athletic....had to unlearn that.
I can’t remember if you mentioned Kyrgios and Thiem. Their forehands are a bit extreme from my point of view. It’s kinda a mix of the two styles you talk about in this clip. High elbow during the take back and racket parallel to the ground & pointing forward, but they generate a lot of speed. What’s your take on that?
this is how i naturally hit my forehand, would love to hear about it as well
Me also, the flight path is different as over the shoulder for standard, then the newer arcing motion.
Keep it simple and have a good strategy and plan
Excellent work ❤
Check out Tom Allsop's channel. But seems to me he is right - you can use a next gen like prep and then just supinate to get closer to the lag position. Without actively supinating (external rotation) during the drop / swing - you are going to be able to hit with slower swings. I am pretty sure Fed can play mini tennis with a kid - this is how he would do it.
Great explanation
How would you describe the Ivan Lendl Forehand compared to modern forehands. And especially McEnroe forehand was very specific.
Depends also if you're a player that takes balls early or if you stand 10 feet behind the baseline
Yesss
Hi. Thank you for your videos. Can you share how to vary spin? It's easier for me to hit topspin on the forehand than to hit flat. Is it important to vary?
Ok. Essentially, players do still have the option to copy, especially the Zverev, and Federer options, but they would have to accept the risks involved.
I do wonder if the rackets they use, or grew up using may have also influenced how their technique developed.
Just because you need lag doesn't mean you need that crazy lag like Roger and Rafa at recreational level. Just let the gravity do its job for you, and focus on what's in front of you.
I have a weak arm I am not able to generate good racket speed. My racket goes towards side when drooping the racket. Plz advise should i change my take back towards fence to generate high racket speed
If it fits you yes
Is Del Potro's forehand style dead at todays game on the pro tour because is more old school?¿
You don’t create the lag by moving your racket back with a wrist movement!! The lag is just the result of a relaxed wrist. It just happens when you accelerate the racket forward with a loose wrist.
When I grip the racket at the end like Borg I can hit the ball in wiper swing with more power and safety than I would grip it in normal, I don't know why? Is it a stance thing? Open and closed?
Nick! Which brand is your racquet? All white looks sooo sick
If he’s 100% Babolat, looks like a Pure Strike. Or Technifibre.
He didn't know the essential difference between next-generation forehand technique and modern forehand technique.
Novak Djokovic beat those kids again which forehand he uses
Club players dont need crazy western forehand grips we need an economic take back and a good swing pattern using unit turn .
Well that’s just like your opinion, man.
@@djp3525 a lot of experts agree with me too trying to hit like a pro doesn’t suit everyone good luck if you can hit like Nadal with a full western grip
Just a small nudge on Hubert Hurkacz's name pronunciation. It's not "Hoocards" but "Hoorcatch". Cheers!
Yeah great vid, I agree with not copying the next gen forehand, I was hitting rubbish for a few weeks so I gave it a go and weirdly I hit alright the first time out but it went downhill from there. Plus I found that purely through the profile of the swing meant that I was straightening out the natural angles on the court and it's a worse forehand to defend with, maybe that was just the way I was executing it, from medium paced ball I could hit well but too straight, from a low fast paced shot couldn't block through it so I only had a slice to defend with.
Don’t Copy the NEXT GEN Forehand ❌ - what I meant to say was, "If you copy a Next Gen FH and it doesn't work, don't copy it" 🚶
You forgot del potro and Tsitsipas.
Nik…can I send you video clip of me playing tennis to evaluate and critique? I want to improve without wasting time. Feel like ive hit dead end as “self taught”. $ isn’t an issue.
Check his website, he has such a service
@@rsmith02 thanks.
Dear Sir, i would like to connect with you to analyze current forehand style
Link for video analysis is in the description
Please find my link to analyse my current forehand technique
How do know If im doing in a correct way the lag?¿
Record yourself
Good video but I have to disagree with the part where you said that these players have always played the same way as they do now. They are evolving, just look at the djokovic how he played his forhend lets say in one of his first apparences in grand slam against safin in australia( thers a video of it) compared to the forhend he hits today.
He got way more structured but it's still pretty close to the same. I'd say he just fine tuned it / stopped being lazy haha
98-2008 Federer forehand had less lag and he was using a 90sq +\- inch racquet, still absolutely devastating.
I played Gonzalez in jnrs
Thanks for the like...it took me 10 years to realize I should have been playing like Gonzalez all the time. I am now.44 playing great since I retire from pro. 😂
This is still free guys. Don't say anything
Yo ya desde pequeño agarraba asi la raqueta por que se me hacia cómodo😂
In the description, your "Gear" links to a blue babolat. What racquet are you hitting?
Mystery racket 😮
Again I disagree: you can copy the next gen forehand and hit balls with good paces as 4.0 players.
and have misshits all day too
@@formulaicsounds not a chance, next gen forehand is efficient and effective
@@strongbrain3128 for them
@@formulaicsounds for us too
@@strongbrain3128 at 4.0 sure. I feel comfortable hitting eastern or semi. But if im playing a strong 4.5/5.0 it's to my benefit to stay steady with a quick Novak setup. Cheers
Sounds like wta forehands ;)
sorry, but want sinner aggressive playstyle
The next gen's forehand was still destroyed by Djokovic any way. Look at Musetti.
Dude I dunno if you are confusing people intentionally or you are just a bad coach!
"Who-cardz" is hilarious ))) the guy is so boring that even Nick doesn't know his name's pronunciation ))) hahaha
@@jerome_morrow oh this is REAL one?))) haha might be, but anyway all the world calls him "hoor-catch" and Nick should've known that if he'd cared ))
@@golllaur it is "Hoor-catch", Im Polish
@@maxpowers4436 it's Hoor-catch, not Her-catch. Nick's pronounciation was far enough that I needed to pause for 3 seconds to figure out who he's talking about :D
Sounds like he had it spelled wrong on that piece of paper, that's why it was so off, at least that's my guess
This guy shouldn’t talk about forehand at all. He has such a bad technique…and this is so unimportant detail he mention!! Really… who is putting this comments here? „great video” - paid/fake accounts?. Please start playing correct technique yourself. Check any video of Patrick Mouratouglue and you will see whats important and whats not… so borring story here
Patrick "Mouratouglue" gives advice that is inappropriate for amateurs (and questionable for pros)
mortglu is such a fraud lol
@@rusty935 fraud at teaching? Your okey? Videos are free go and listen… that is all you have to do, and technique is repeatable by most pro tennis players.