Reaper is the better DAW but pro tools was the only thing around when David and every other engineer came up, so they're all stuck in the avid sphere or don't want to change... Not that they SHOULD change, but like pro tools sucks, it's gotta be Stockholm syndrome
Reaper has many things out of the box. I had to stop watching people review new plugins because it was something that reaper had already. I have a lot of respect for this Chanel and have learned a lot but here we go again.
The only reasons to use Pro Tools are: 1) Everyone else uses it and so you need to be on the same page for a myriad of reasons (over time, this will go away) 2) It's what you already know how to use and would be a waste of time to learn another DAW (this will also eventually go away) I don't hate on Pro Tools or any DAW or anyone who uses what they prefer for their reasons, as this is silly and it's about music, but these are realities when considering DAW's
@@Melvin7727 this is the point I tried to make. These are the only two reasons to ever use it. It's otherwise a very mid DAW and really should go the way of the dodo
Honest knee-jerk reaction: I like it. I get the workflow it offers. The thing making me avoid it is the subscription. TBH, my workload is very inconsistent, so I'd be a lot more comfortable with a perpetual license option. I can't honestly get straddled with subscriptions in a promiscuous market, so this misses my demographic.
Have to agree. I work in audio post production, I only really need to do big batch bouncing at the end of a job when handing over all assets. This app would save me a great deal of time but $19 a month seems very steep for something I'll use for 1 day out of 30. Not to mention with my already extortionate PT Ultimate subscription + plug in bundles...
I'm all subscription-fatigued out. Anything that doesn't have a perpetual option, is no longer welcome in my workflow. Half of the developers that do this, don't even make regular feature additions or upgrades - it's just another way of milking more money out of the end user. If Avid had any sense, this would already be built into Pro Tools... like it already is in many other DAWs. It's long past time they started earning their subscription fee also. 20 to 50 bucks a month? Does that come with a monthly supply of whatever Scheps has been smokin'? 🤔🤣 Nice try Andrew, but this guy won't be contributing to your retirement fund. 🤷🏼♂️🤣
It's neat I guess but if you have your tracks well labeled and organized (which the pros will anyway), your computer's processing power up to speed (which the pros will anyway), and you have a list of mix versions the client will want (which the pros will anyway), it kinda seems like this program might save you a few minutes, after you set it up. Even on my antiquated computer, bouncing doesn't take very long. I'd rather spend the money on more ram or a CPU upgrade.
@@mixbustv Why do you always do personal attacks/assumptions in the comments when people are critical of things that aren't even your product? I make money mixing, but I have the features in this plugin for free in Reaper. I'm entitled to say it's too expensive because I already have it for free.
@@mixbustv Or maybe because I haven't lost touch with money. It costs 5 times as much as I pay per year for my pro tools studio subscription. It's not a bad tool, but it's never worth that much. In addition, I already pay for the soundflow subscription every month, which is also an additional cost. I would like to hear the manufacturer's reasoning as to why they have to offer it for this price
@@PierreBaudinat Reaper already has a native snapshot feature to manage (save, restore...) project versions. With render presets you can do almost all that is showcased in this video, with some other cool features : stems but also separate tracks export (with mono/strereo/multichannels management), project regions (useful for sounddesign or motion music or dialogs), automatic files names generation (wildcards are awesome !) and render paths with (sub)folders management, render stats (different LUFS, loudness range...) with project markers/regions visible... Natively, with no app or subscription, and without collecting your projects datas !
Ok I have to word this better to get you to understand me. Maybe I went down my own crazy rabbit hole, but I tried to ask a question in the live and I couldn’t word it right. What I’m trying to figure out is “How do I hit -0DBFS without the meter hitting yellow at all”. Every meter has a yellow zone. I noticed that pro mixes don’t hit the yellow indicator. Please get back to me and thank you sir ❤
WOW...This thing is amazing...!...David, can I suggest an "off topic" video idea here. I think it would be really cool if you could do a video covering a bare minimum (starting point), and maybe go into intermediate with using hardware for mixing...i.e...If you're just starting, do the mix bus using this gear (gear type). After that, start by doing X...!...I think it would be really beneficial for those just getting started with hardware mixing...!...It might be a series of "How to get started mixing with hardware"...!...Thanks for all you do brother...!!!
@@mixbustv Ok. On that point I surrender. But remember most of your followers do not need HDX. And even if they needed, they may not have resources to afford HDX. I new UAD interfaces have DSP, I know Waves have DSP options but I chose RME, Reaper and a grandma computer. So understand my joy when I learn that high end sofwares like protools are lagging behind Reaper!!!!!
This is actually a real concern. I would always check the terms and conditions of any type of service to see if it includes verbiage that your submissions can be used for that purpose. If it doesn't specifically grant them the rights to do so, you can take legal action.
I love things that save time and to be more organized. Makes life more simple instead of going back and accidentally bouncing or forgetting to bounce certain things. Genius
In this case it sounds more like advertising is what makes you money. Lots of people make a living mixing without being a subscription slave to every single basic feature Pro Tools trots out that other DAW's already do for free (and more)
@@mixbustv I cared to read that others are unsubscribing like I am. It's nice to know when content creators start shilling and double down on it that people see through the BS. Gives me some faith in humanity. Still love you anyway David, but bye.
Now that's cool. Andrew mixed a song called Swan Upon Leda for Hozier and it sounds absolutely amazing. He's great. It helps of course when Hozier is singing.
Reaper has this out of the box with the Render Queue
Reaper is the better DAW but pro tools was the only thing around when David and every other engineer came up, so they're all stuck in the avid sphere or don't want to change... Not that they SHOULD change, but like pro tools sucks, it's gotta be Stockholm syndrome
😂😂
Reaper has many things out of the box. I had to stop watching people review new plugins because it was something that reaper had already. I have a lot of respect for this Chanel and have learned a lot but here we go again.
The only reasons to use Pro Tools are:
1) Everyone else uses it and so you need to be on the same page for a myriad of reasons (over time, this will go away)
2) It's what you already know how to use and would be a waste of time to learn another DAW (this will also eventually go away)
I don't hate on Pro Tools or any DAW or anyone who uses what they prefer for their reasons, as this is silly and it's about music, but these are realities when considering DAW's
@@Melvin7727 this is the point I tried to make. These are the only two reasons to ever use it. It's otherwise a very mid DAW and really should go the way of the dodo
Honest knee-jerk reaction: I like it. I get the workflow it offers. The thing making me avoid it is the subscription. TBH, my workload is very inconsistent, so I'd be a lot more comfortable with a perpetual license option. I can't honestly get straddled with subscriptions in a promiscuous market, so this misses my demographic.
Have to agree. I work in audio post production, I only really need to do big batch bouncing at the end of a job when handing over all assets. This app would save me a great deal of time but $19 a month seems very steep for something I'll use for 1 day out of 30. Not to mention with my already extortionate PT Ultimate subscription + plug in bundles...
I'm all subscription-fatigued out. Anything that doesn't have a perpetual option, is no longer welcome in my workflow. Half of the developers that do this, don't even make regular feature additions or upgrades - it's just another way of milking more money out of the end user.
If Avid had any sense, this would already be built into Pro Tools... like it already is in many other DAWs. It's long past time they started earning their subscription fee also.
20 to 50 bucks a month? Does that come with a monthly supply of whatever Scheps has been smokin'? 🤔🤣 Nice try Andrew, but this guy won't be contributing to your retirement fund. 🤷🏼♂️🤣
it's amazing AVID isn't able to have this done in ProTools integrated when other DAWs like Reaper have this built in for years
I just came to say Reaper does it already. No text message, though... but it does it
To be fair, this is a feature pretty much every DAW has been sleeping on. I’ve put in feature requests for this in Logic every year. Crickets.
Subscription services are for the birds.
Constant online is for the birds.
Shilling is for the birds.
💯
What are all the birds for then? 🐦
Beats my two pair
Quite nice if your DAW cannot do this. Cubase users are quite spoiled in this regard, almost all of this you can do natively.
Yep Cubase can do most of this. That's why it's PT only...
How can cubase do all this automaticly
Wake me after you take two in the morning when they get the automation module/template for Sequoia and REAPER.
if it wasnt a monthly based model, i would buy it
Subscriptions are a no go for me.
Same
It's neat I guess but if you have your tracks well labeled and organized (which the pros will anyway), your computer's processing power up to speed (which the pros will anyway), and you have a list of mix versions the client will want (which the pros will anyway), it kinda seems like this program might save you a few minutes, after you set it up. Even on my antiquated computer, bouncing doesn't take very long. I'd rather spend the money on more ram or a CPU upgrade.
Another viable solution is to just switch to Reaper :)
Does it come in HDX? :)
@@mixbustv Natively, since 2006! ;)
Have you tried the Stam SA-609?
Yes, love it
way too expensive
Probably because you're not making money mixing but mixing to save money.
@@mixbustv
Why do you always do personal attacks/assumptions in the comments when people are critical of things that aren't even your product? I make money mixing, but I have the features in this plugin for free in Reaper. I'm entitled to say it's too expensive because I already have it for free.
It’s really starting to look like he’s a shill for a lot of products. 🤡
$500/year for a basic feature set… year after year… yeah, FffffffffUuuuuu
@@mixbustv Or maybe because I haven't lost touch with money. It costs 5 times as much as I pay per year for my pro tools studio subscription. It's not a bad tool, but it's never worth that much. In addition, I already pay for the soundflow subscription every month, which is also an additional cost. I would like to hear the manufacturer's reasoning as to why they have to offer it for this price
@@mixbustv
"X is too expensive"
"Because you're too poor lol"
Why treat people this way?
all the pros....that still use pro tools
You gotta wonder why one of the biggest pro developed this for other pros FOR PT lol
Reaper 's render menu seems to do many of this things natively
Absolutely ! But the "snapshot" thing is a step above.
@@mixbustv Because PT lacks of features like this. lol
@@PierreBaudinat Reaper already has a native snapshot feature to manage (save, restore...) project versions.
With render presets you can do almost all that is showcased in this video, with some other cool features : stems but also separate tracks export (with mono/strereo/multichannels management), project regions (useful for sounddesign or motion music or dialogs), automatic files names generation (wildcards are awesome !) and render paths with (sub)folders management, render stats (different LUFS, loudness range...) with project markers/regions visible...
Natively, with no app or subscription, and without collecting your projects datas !
No subscriptions. Thanks.
2nded
Fk that bs
how does this handle mute automation on drumbus or vocals when bouncing instrumentals or stems?
Ok I have to word this better to get you to understand me. Maybe I went down my own crazy rabbit hole, but I tried to ask a question in the live and I couldn’t word it right. What I’m trying to figure out is “How do I hit -0DBFS without the meter hitting yellow at all”. Every meter has a yellow zone. I noticed that pro mixes don’t hit the yellow indicator. Please get back to me and thank you sir ❤
Can you pick VCAs to create stems?
Yes
WOW...This thing is amazing...!...David, can I suggest an "off topic" video idea here. I think it would be really cool if you could do a video covering a bare minimum (starting point), and maybe go into intermediate with using hardware for mixing...i.e...If you're just starting, do the mix bus using this gear (gear type). After that, start by doing X...!...I think it would be really beneficial for those just getting started with hardware mixing...!...It might be a series of "How to get started mixing with hardware"...!...Thanks for all you do brother...!!!
I know you're a big hybrid guy, so how does this affect you with the hardware aspect?
It doesn't really, this works on or offline
Looks like it's only for some DAWs and only for Mac (?)
Would that affect my mute automations?
No unless you want to
Laughing! Reaper has this feature from years ago!
Does reaper have HDX? lol laughing
@@mixbustv Ok. On that point I surrender. But remember most of your followers do not need HDX. And even if they needed, they may not have resources to afford HDX. I new UAD interfaces have DSP, I know Waves have DSP options but I chose RME, Reaper and a grandma computer. So understand my joy when I learn that high end sofwares like protools are lagging behind Reaper!!!!!
Wow! I need this!!!! Thank you David!
REAPER do this for free
HDX
So does this mean that Protools is open for scripting by user?
This is awesome! Thank you David
Revision sounds better as "Version". Sorry i must. Good luck
If you get revisions then it's what YOU should use yes lol I don't
@mixbustv Im sorry, You know it more as me. I hate only that word "Version". I dont know why. I see it as same like ahm limousine.
Sounds like a convenient way to harvest data about mixing sessions to feed the next auto-mix everything type of AI 🎉🎉🎉
🤦
This is actually a real concern. I would always check the terms and conditions of any type of service to see if it includes verbiage that your submissions can be used for that purpose. If it doesn't specifically grant them the rights to do so, you can take legal action.
Yup, sounds sketch af
Amazing video, David!!! :-)
I love things that save time and to be more organized. Makes life more simple instead of going back and accidentally bouncing or forgetting to bounce certain things. Genius
$500 per YR.........WAY TO MUCH $$$
Not if mixing makes you money, probably yes if you have to mix to save money.
In this case it sounds more like advertising is what makes you money. Lots of people make a living mixing without being a subscription slave to every single basic feature Pro Tools trots out that other DAW's already do for free (and more)
Thank you for showing this David!
So awesome!
Wow...this is standard is most DAWs XD
What a bunch of nonsense. Time to unsubscribe
@@samjones714 you don't need to announce it lol nobody cares. Not like you're paying 😂
@@mixbustv
I cared to read that others are unsubscribing like I am. It's nice to know when content creators start shilling and double down on it that people see through the BS. Gives me some faith in humanity. Still love you anyway David, but bye.
Now that's cool. Andrew mixed a song called Swan Upon Leda for Hozier and it sounds absolutely amazing. He's great. It helps of course when Hozier is singing.
Thank you! Good to know!
Huge time saver! I might not have an excuse anymore not to get to the gym down the street from my studio.
This is pretty cool
Wow! This is huge, I didn't know about it
This really saves so much time
Rally cool app, thank you Dave!
One thing covered AI should be able to do to actually help ☝😂
❤❤