Extruding the thermocouple into the nozzle to measure the gradient between the heatbreak and actual nozzle temps was brilliant. And so was the way you figured out the temperature gradient. I had tuned my Revo Hemera to run 15 degrees hotter, but I put it down to the massive inconsistencies between different batches of eSun ABS+ filament. This is some top notch testing and terrific example of lateral thinking. Genuinely impressed with this review.
I tested all E-sun range of filaments 3 yers ago, got to the conclusion that I am better off after I sent them the results and they blamed.... me for trying to ruin their business. No more E-sun products anymore.
@@severpop8699 eSun ABS+, like most things Chinesium, tend to vary wildly from spool to spool. You absolutely must tune each spool for flow and temperature settings, and conduct layer adhesion tests or you are in for a bad time. eSun filaments are essentially garbage, but garbage is cheap. So I use them for prototyping and to otherwise try out stuff. The actual final parts I plan to use are pritned in Polymaker ASA, ABS, or Nylon.
@@nachiketmhatre7411 The problem I encounterd was on PLA, PLA plus, PLA carbon fiber, PETG, PETG carbon fiber, ABS, TPU, HIPS, PC, PC carbon fiber from E-sun that in the same spool there were inconsintecies in temperature needed, suggesting the filament was extruded into a spool out of cross contaminated materials of different composition, I even burned some segments to see if I can smell the differecnde as filament burning progressed, and yes, it smelled like popcorn, than like nylon, than like ABS than again like popcorn in one meter. This shows me their quality check is inexistent, they do not clean thir machines between batches, and whtever they have leftover in a bin they throw it in the next bin to save some Kg from being discharded, but they might throw in PLA ove ABS and over PC, they don't care. The other Chinesium PLA, PETG, ABS etc have not this problem, they might differ from spool to spool, but not within the same spool, besides their pretty pricy filament behaves in printing and post printing worse than bloody chep competiton from the same country.
@@severpop8699 eSUN PA-CF is one of my favorite filaments. I like it better than carbon-X because its not nearly as brittle. Strong AF and looks really nice too!
@@severpop8699 I had been having good results with ESun but I have recently been very confused as to why I couldn't get good layer adhesion with my ESun rainbow filament. I thought I was going crazy since it still broke apart even at 230c! (PLA+).
The problem with changing nozzles is less the hassle of it and more that I'm scared I might screw it up and either over tighten it or not tighten it enough leaving plastic to sip in between the nozzle and heat break. I imagine the new system is a lot more newbie friendly than the existing nozzle system.
There is an answer to this problem that is really simple : use torque wrench or torque screwdriver. There is even some that can be 3D printed. I never destroyed anything using the right tool.
1) I love how thorough you are with testing. I don't think anyone else on UA-cam does it the way you do...thank you! 2) It seems like a lot of expense for benefits that may be rather minimal to a number of users. It seems that the #1 benefit is rapid nozzle changes, but I don't stress about performing nozzle changes, either on the Mk8 hot end on my Ender 3 or the Volcano on my Sidewinder X1. Having a palm ratchet instead of the basic tools that come with most printers maybe helps with that, of course, but those are relatively inexpensive and are useful for anyone with a V6, Mk8, Volcano, or other standard hot end. That kind of price tag for otherwise similar performance and a slightly increase in overall safety seems a bit much. 3) The inaccurate temperature thing might not affect normal printing performance (albeit after what might be a lengthy profile re-tuning process), but it is concerning that there doesn't seem to have been more thought put into how to account for the new thermal profile of the hot end. 4) The lack of licensing for clones is one more example of a seemingly growing trend back towards proprietary tech in 3D printing. The reasoning seems good this time, certainly compared to what Elegoo and ChiTuBox are trying to do with resin printing, but the end result is the same. We'd still be mired in the dark days of using $3,000 printers that are more finicky than a Rube Goldberg machine to print only ABS if it weren't for the massive amount of innovation that came from the open-source model that the industry has thrived on over the last several years.
Regarding 4, I would say we don't have to worry too much about it: E3D gets their deserved cash from it, until someone circumvents their patents with something cool, maybe even better. I feel like this industry itself, in general, cannot be dominated by proprietary solutions, given the technical understanding of the client base: the industries that need the machines that work 100% of the time (as if they did...) have always had different business models tied to ecosystems and different deals with those brands, hence the traditional 2D printer manufacturers thrive there but not with the other client base, us makers and tinkerers, that know how to circumvent BS moves they might try to pull, and would gladly buy a replacement Aliexpress board/part that solves the issue, which will be quickly available in that hypothetical scenario. I do wonder about your real example tho of the resin printers, cause I know the Chitubox boards and LCD kits are being sold cheaply enough exactly to that client base that doesn't take the BS, but, I sort-of remember seeing alternatives on the same places that weren't tied down like that. Now I'm not entirely sure tho, so I'm not claiming anything.
It's not more expensive than comparable hotends. It can't be compared to a V6 clone; they don't have equivalent features. A lot of people consider a mosquito an alternative, and that's more than twice as expensive.
Comment on item 2: I have a prusa mk3s+ with the "staggered?" Heatbreak 2mm to 2.2mm. I've been plagued by jams 1 month after I got my printer. These jams are only happening in the heatbreak and no where near the nozzle, this has happened with pla and petg. Mostly with pla, petg not that often. I haven't printed any other materials because it's so frustrating to deal with this. I recently found out I can get a new heatbreak that's actually the original e3d one and it should prevents this. But I've been leaning towards just getting the revo and being done with it. I don't swap nozzle often, but if I do want to, I need to consider the fact that I might initiate jamming by messing with the hotend in anyway. And it almost always occurs. Which leads to a whole dismantling of thr hotend, heating up thr hearsink with a hest gun and trying to cold pull the stuck filament. (Have to dismantle because the bond tech gears mash and melt the filament directly below the gears so it can't move any further down even if the jam clears, and it can't be cold pulled all the way up because the blob doesn't fit out upwards through the filament sensor. I ripped out out once and sent the little ball and plastic piece of the filament sensor flying. So yea. Even though I don't replace nozzles often. I still see a huge benefit to this nozzle for myself.
The tool-less changing is really a game changer. I had some other nozzles laying around, but never used them because I was afraid to mess up. Since I installed the revo I print every piece on the most suitable detail level. Winning a lot of speed and print quality!
Long story short in favor of the Revo. The other day I wanted to change the nozzle on my Prusa i3. As usual I heated the hotend, held the heater block with a wrench with my left hand and used another 7 mm key with my right hand to unscrew the nozzle. But this time I didn't pay enough attention. During a fraction of a second, the wrench touched the exposed cables of the heater cartridge on the side (these cables are indeed EXPOSED because of their silly 90° orientation caused by how idiotic heater blocks have been designed). A short circuit ensued, with a visible and audible spark that cut one of the cables of the heater cartridge straight. After repair, I came to the sad conclusion that the motherboard (Einsy RAMBo) had been toasted by the spark too: there was no more voltage on the pins when asking the hotend to heat. This is a €150 repair, with 2× 1 week waiting for the parts, with excessive shipping costs. For such a bad heater block design, which I despised since the beginning even before I even had a problem with it. On my other printer (Voron 2.4) I went with another kind of hotend not so stupidly designed (a clone of the Mosquito, with a fixed, non-rotatable heater block). But for my Prusa I will seriously consider replacing the E3D V6 with a Revo when it is eventually repaired.
I have a Revo Six running on my Mk3s, having changed over from a Mosquito. I do a lot of nozzle size changes and the Mosquito was a good solution. The Revo nozzle changes are slower than with a Mosquito, but the tidy heater wiring and PTC heater are why I switched. As a bonus, the Revo stays much cleaner. The inevitable plastic mess never gets highter than the bottom of the Revo nozzle.
Iv'e had my Revo for a few weeks and I love it. I never liked changing nozzles in the past as I had bad luck with things breaking or leaking and it was just a pain, now it's painless. Thanks for your very detailed review and investigations.
Currently throwing up a document about 3d printing extrusion systems. A big list for say. I appreciate your work a lot, always got great research. Keep it up Stefan!
@@thai9503 Nope, the revo is at the bottom of the list pretty much. It sucks compared to other options like the nf crazy, dragonfly, rapido, volcomosq, etc. I'm a real enthusiast with 8 printers and years of experience xD
Great review, thanks Stefan! What bothers me most when changing nozzles (I switch them a lot atm): re-adjusting Z-offsets. Will be interesting if the tolerances of the final production units eliminate that process 🧐
You could use something like the Vorons do and set your z with an end stop triggered by the nozzle. That way, regardless of nozzle location, your offsets from the tip to the bed will be consistent.
@@heavenisalie lucky you. I went through last weekend calibrating my set. Seems the .25 and .8 are very similar in length, and thus similar Z offset. And then .4 and .6 have identical length, so again, same offset. But the difference between the two groups' lengths (and thus Z offsets) is about 0.2mm! Which is honestly quite a lot. Anyway, so I have basically different profiles on my Prusa so when I switch nozzles I also have to switch sheet settings.
Man, these sorts of features are exactly the thing we need in the hobby. Swapping nozzles is such a hassle, and it's not just about swapping sizes, but maybe other things, like swapping out clogged nozzles for unclogged ones or whatever. Shame there are no aftermarket solutions yet for abrasives, but I imagine they will come.
I do a ton of 3D printing for work (a yacht company). I only print in ASA plastic because its higher temp, UV resistant, and it sands really well. So for speed and strength purposes I only print in 0.6mm nozzles. I print large prints that get sanded and painted 99% of the time. I used to switch hotends to a .4mm nozzle for better resolution on smaller parts, but It became a pain so I just stuck with the 0.6mm for all prints. Since switching over to the revo, I switch between 0.4 and 0.6 2-3 times a week! Its such a game changer! Im a big fan!
Amazing video Stefan, thank you! I switched my MINI+ to Revo Micro as soon as it became available. I frequently switch between 0.25 / 0.4 / 0.6 mm nozzles and just got tired of the cycle times. Revo changed all that, especially with the additional retraction in end-gcode. That said I did notice a need for higher temperatures with certain filaments. I have a thermocouple multimeter here and thought about testing the temperatures, but I'm glad to see you did a far more thorough job! :o) Thanks again, and I have just bought Grammarly Premium 1yr through your affiliate link.
I tried to get a warranty for the heater core assembly that the thermistor failed on for my MK3S after little use. They made me jump through too many hoops and multiple correspondences. Finally gave up and purchased another assembly and it fixed the problem. Out $40. I could use a kit for my Mini but I am reluctant to do so after that. Otherwise it works great and convenient. Might as well forget trying to get a warranty.
I own a Revo Hemera and use it on my tuned Ender 3 pro... Thank you very much for the in depth high quality analysis of this system: I'll look over my temperature settings, especially because I have a slightly overpowered two fan part cooling setup. I'm so grateful for content like this!
I just bought a revo Hemera to replace my busted extruder on my CR10s Pro V2. Wasn’t looking at getting the Hemera, but then my extruder destroyed its self. Great video. I’ll have to watch / check my temperatures when setting everything up. I also wanted the revo because I do change nozzles a lot. I’m loving the idea that I may not have to do first layer calibrations every time too. Keep up the great work
I for one have to give it a hard pass for a bunch of reasons with the most prominent one being the lack of backwards compatibility with the established V6 _Nozzle_ Standard allowing for outside innovations ( like the CHT Nozzles ) to be added to the system.
My go to response for these type of propriety nozzle, heater, thermistor solutions is a hard pass too. It is is easier to stay in the well known ecosystem and use common parts.
@@Tacks3D Same. It really could have been revolutionary if they had kept it open so it could become a new ecosystem for the whole industry. Probably would have made them more money in the long run too. Sad that this whole branch of innovation is now cut off.
A design patent only protects non-functional design features. Thus, everything that is "just looks" must be sufficiently different in a "clone". But a hole in the middle, the outer diameter and length of the hot section, that cannot be a design patent. It could be a functional patent though. (However note that Brompton bicycles seems to be very good at abusing their trademark of what their products looks like. Trademarks do not expire.
Well, there's the law as it is written and then there's the law as it is used. If someone offers clones on Amazon, E3D just has to wave their patent and Amazon will throw that seller of the platform. If a UA-camr reviews clone nozzles, E3D just has to wave their patent and UA-cam will take down the video and give the UA-camr a community guidelines strike. No one will go to court to challenge this because it's too expensive.
Yes, a functional patent, about the coupled nozzle and heatbreak combo that make the whole deal work as intended (otherwise the rapid change wouldn't function) is enough of an innovation to be functional-patented from what I imagine circles around the existing patents. So it would make no difference to Make some square shaped Rovo hotend if it's still a heatbreak nozzle combo. From my reading they have left the cold side open source (it's the Hemera one anyway) but the hotend is their patent.
@@frankbauerful On the other side, "waving your patent" is quiet time consuming and expensive as well. Especially because all the cheap chinese knock off brands don't care about intellectual property and patents, anyway.
@@frankbauerful Amazon, UA-cam maybe, but won't stop AliExpress or eBay sellers, they won't even bother to change the shape to not violate the design patent...
Thanks for the deep technical insights 👍 I'm in doubt if it's worth to get this kit. It may good for people with no sense of torque in the hands and over screw the threads every nozzle swap. The kit seems to offer only brass nozzles, I prefer also hardnerd steel for abrasive material. If the thermistor /heat element dies you had to throw away the whole heat block. That is not in the sense of savings precious raw materials. What about if the kit nozzle unit gets clogged? How can you clean it? A single nozzle you can change or clean relative easily. PS : if the punched numbers on conventional nozzles are no more readable because of burned plastic, heat it up and clean it with a little brass-wire brush. The you can sing "I can see clearly now..."
There is an unofficial high-flow Revo, and it is the Phaetus Rapido hotend... It uses the same ring-heater approach but with an incredible 115W of heating, it can achieve flow rates of 45 mm^3/s with a standard V6 nozzle and supports a one-hand nozzle swap, as the heating core is bolted to the heat sink with 3 titanium screws. It's like a fusion of E3D Volcano, E3D Revo and SE Copperhead, costs less than either, and is powerful/durable AF.
i didn't realize that the rapido used standard v6's. that's actually really baller and way more of the kind of thing I was expecting out of the genuine Revo
Sounds like a winner, for the price the negatives don't seem to bad. I'm already far into the mosquito setup & very happy with it, but it & the nozzles are far from cheap, but no problems either. I love all the testing you do & data you present so well, thank you!
The temperature disparity is actually a deal breaker for me. Many of my prints rely on airflow and speed changes to achieve desired properties and inaccurate temperature that will vary based on the amount of airflow is a no go for me.
And the only solution to that would be extensive testing to find the temperature gradient based on airflow, compared to just running an already working system, no thanks.
The process of 3D printing is a bit like cooking-that is, purely empirical. Achieving desired results isn't just about turning knobs and punching in in absolute vales. You have to run calibration prints and modify the settings in a closed feedback loop of tuning. You did the same with your existing hot end. If you were to run the same tests on your hot end, you will find similar deviation from the expected results. I had run my battery of calibration prints and I had set my Revo Hemera to print at 265°C, as opposed to the 250°C of the V6 hot end attached to it. At the end of the day, this really doesn't affect your prints, because you are going to recalibrate everything.
Actually If you do not use a coefficient to adjust for inaccuracies of Thermistor your Temperature reading will be most likely be wrong. Duet offers do change the Steinhart coefficient (C) to adjust for inaccuracies. Secondly depending on variable printing speed you use (for instance faster infill than perimeter etc.) I can assure you that the filament will not reach the temperature you set on your LCD. One thing is to measure the nozzle temperature the other is the actual temperature of the filament you are extruding. I highly doubt that you will see a significant difference between Revo and the current hotend you are using.
@@maximilian.arnold precisely. There are too many variables that affect the actual printing process apart from temperature recorded in the nozzle. Absolute numbers are good relative indicators to nudge you along in the right direction, but at the end of the day, you must rely on the empirical process of calibration and print tuning.
Yeah this is actually quite surprising, thank you Stefan for the investigation and discovery. I actually bought the whole damn thing but haven't had time to install it yet. Now I am wondering if I should put it on my main workhorse mk3s, or put it on my tinkerbot. Sigh.
For me, V6 is the best because I can use literally any type of third-party nozzle, and I can easily machine custom heating blocks. However, as someone who’s recently had a two-and-a-half-day print fail at work due to a V6 heatbreak that had come loose and filled the head with PLA gloop, I certainly see the benefit of a more sealed and reliable unit. Pity we won’t see third-party nozzles.
Literally just got my Hemera Revo. So for.... it's going OK. The dirty secret probably explains why my nozzle clogged on my first print until I upped the temp a bit.
I have a E3D volcano. I designed to change the whole body(cooler, nozzle, block, heater, ntc) in 1-2 minutes. No need to wait to cool down but you need ready spare one.
Revo & MMU2 combo works really well for me, by default the MMU2 removes filament on print finish so it's perfect for nozzle swaps (I know this can be done via gcode too for non MMU printers)
I just dont see the "improvements" being worth the extra cost. Especially since you're basically locking yourself into their echosystem. For example I like using the CHT with my hemera. And I can use a vast array of nozzles with it. And even now theres a lack of nozzles. Sure more are coming.... but when? And how much will they be. Im just not feeling it tbh and im a huge fan of e3d.
I've experienced two (2!) thermistors failing in the Revo Micro - not sure what is going on, but they were manufactured in Dec 2021 and Feb 2022. I get the "Verify Heater" message in klipper f/w for my V2.4.
Great review, thanks! I have Revo Micro on my Prusa Mini and the ease of nozzle changing is fantastic. No more “this is big part, 0.6 would be better, but I’m too lazy to change nozzle”. This works very well.
My printer runs a E3D V6, but I'll be watching to see whether the Revo becomes a solid contender for aggressive materials, and of course whether the higher nozzle prices are justified by better performance.
I have 3 prusas. mk3s+ with revo, mk3s+ with Olsson ruby, mk2.5s with E3d V6. For met the revo is clearly better. Nicer print results, heats faster, cools faster. Better cooling of the part ( revo hotend is smaller).Easy nozzle swipe. I highly recommend it, even if the temperature according to this study has a deviation.
I switched to the Revo on my MK3S/MMU2S a few weeks ago and love it. I have damaged the thermister before on the old system while changing nozzles so I was always gun shy about doing it too often, but now with the Revo I will decide on the best nozzle size for nearly every print. And since the MMU2 retracts the filament automatically after printing, I don't have to wait for the heating and cooling cycle. I will mention that I did notice a slight length difference when swapping nozzles, so a minor Z calibration is still needed. I just record the offset numbers for each nozzle so it isn't a big deal.
Good review, not from another E3D fanboy. Although 16mm^3/s is nothing, so I hope the HF is at least double that (though it is likely only around 24mm^3/s). And the temperature instability with cooling should be highlighted/tested more
Stephan, thanks for all the good work. I have two revos which are back out of the printers I put them into (Vorons). I found the cold extrusion to be a real problem. My extruder was 30-40C colder (as measured with a Fluke 87V with a type K thermocouple) than reported. This created unusable parts. So temporarily I have put my Phaetus Dragon HF back in and have been watching to see others experiences.
This is amazing work ! Btw I’ve shared with you on Facebook messenger my test results of the Dragon HF hotend with the CHT nozzle and it’s pretty amazing. 27mm^3/sec with only 3-4% extrusion loss.
I wasn't really sure if I wanted a Revo, after all both my Mini and MK3S+ print perfectly fine with the v6 nozzles. Replacing the nozzle on the MK3S+ isn't that much of a hazzle anymore after I got the right tools (16 mm wrench and torque screwdriver), but I do remove the fan shroud to get easier access which makes it a little more work. I did not replace a nozzle on my Mini yet, mostly because I didn't have to and didn't want to mess with the different style heater block. That said - I have ordered two Revos now - one Micro for the Mini, because it is supposed to be lighter (not sure if that's still the case with the 2nd revision of the hotend that uses the original fan) which should help with the cantilevered axis. The second one is a Revo Six replacement for the MK3S+ so I'm able to use the same nozzles as for the Mini, but more importantly because I have seen reports that the Revo nozzles form better tips and need less ramming which will help with MMU2s prints. Since the MMU setup always retracts the filament from the hotend at the end of a print, it's also very convenient to replace the nozzle at any time.
I didn't notice the strain relief on the heater core, so that's good. I have damaged the wires on those cartridges, so this is a welcome upgrade. Plus I don't have to worry about damaging the wires with a crescent wrench. Once the local filament/parts shop started selling Revo, I ordered one immediately because the office MK3S started very slowly leaking scorched filament and depositing it on prints.
I personally am testing/using a hotend that consists of a V6 heat sink, a titanium heat break/throat and a Maxiwatt heating cylinder/donut. It is very fast to heat even at 40W standard (0-220 in something like 46 seconds) seems to keep the heat well (even without a silicone sock as I can't find one for the 10mm by 20mm diameter disc shape) I enjoy it a lot, but the conversion required a new mount, and part cooling required printed ducts to get things going, which became quite a challenge when everything was mis-matched. The only real complaint I have about the Maxiwatt is the lack of strain relief, so the wires can get damaged quite easily, rendering a "heat block" (donut) useless. My only upset was the nozzle price, at nearly $15 US to replace if something happened, clogs and issues that normally are a "just get a new nozzle" approach are no longer available.
I look forward to your Voron build video. I have been ordering parts to build a 2.4, and have not gotten to the head yet - I may just go with this from the start.
I put a hardened nozzle in my mk3s the day I assembled it and have never changed it since. I primarily print CF Nylon so at the moment Revo is a no go and the not actually quick, quick change isn't a 'feature' I'd need.
I think the point is that people don't change nozzles often because it's a pain. So you just pick one nozzle as a compromise for all prints. If you could swap easily, you would save lots of time on draft prints, and do a lot more high-detail parts that aren't worth the effort right now.
I've looked long and hard at the pre-order, and so far haven't ordered. what I like most about it is that the heater/thermistor block has decent strain relief, and finally some thought has been given to decent cable routing. I run a titan aero atm, and routed the cables through the mount. there is literally a cm of space in between the bed and the body of the extruder, and there should be room for a part cooler as well. If you have a volcano, the cables go up, which is not bad, but then they have to make 2 hard right angle turns to go anywhere useful. Revo is not perfect here, but it is a step in the right direction, and for this alone i was, and probably in the future still am, willing to give E3D my money. it must be said however that Omniadrop was the first to do this, not E3D, and their heaterblock is v6 compatible. what i dislike is the fact that in between launch and pre-order, there was the CHT nozzle. This seems like a marked evolution in hot end tech, more so than the slight rearrangement that Revo gives. CHT seems to improve on nearly all aspects of delivery, and it's incompatible with Revo because of the patent situation. and yes, i am aware that CHT is licensed as well, and it wasn't invented by Bondtech. What i don't see is a way to integrate CHT with Revo other than making a nozzle break with a blind M6 hole like we've always had. Quite frankly, if E3D makes that, i'm buying. as for the quick swap. I'll use it more than swapping nozzles. mostly because i'm not an organised person and nozzles go missing, and they get dirty enough to be unidentifiable, even with socks.
I didn’t want to wait for one so I bought a mosquito and I love it. The vanadium nozzles are great and switching nozzles with slice’s torque wrench takes what seems like half the time as the v6. I don’t worry about breaking a thermistor wire or having a loose nozzle because everything is rigidly mounted and the heater block doesn’t rotate. I should have done it a long time ago.
The Mosquito is the perfect hotend. Hands down. Combined with a vanadium or better yet, tungsten carbide nozzle, and it will literally print anything with no wear whatsoever. Tungsten is a one and done nozzle. Install it and it will outlast the printer. Nothing scratches it. It eats carbon fiber nylon like candy, no wear at all.
Brilliant review, again, Stefan. I, too, have messed up either the thermistor wires or cross-threaded the steel nozzle and/or heat block on my Swiss-Micro all metal hot end (CR-10S). I have been considering a change, and do appreciate the integrated and strained relieved thermistor, to something with a rapid-change nozzle. I'll keep watching E3D for the Revo-CR nozzle kits (currently on back-order). Thanks!
Excellent work! The thermistor position issue is unfortunate. It’ll be a pain if you have to adjust the extrusion temp as a function of part cooling. OTOH, as you say, this might also be a factor with other hot ends; something I’ll have to pay attention to in my printing. Given that, I’m surprised that it performed better than the original at high flow rates; that’s a good thing! I do like the idea of it being easier to change nozzle sizes; I almost never change mine because it’s such a hassle :-/
For those of you that have the ubiquitous V6 nozzle, I have a water cooling solution that is drop-in with the same length and everything. No more blowing hot air across your heat sink! I have a few version 2 prototypes that I can send out, and only one version 3 that is amazing, but the cost might be too high to machine, so I just have it on my printer. If there is enough interest in them, I can get them batch made and have them at a reasonable price for you all. They take 1/8 npt fittings so you can choose the diameter of tubing. I use 8mm od tube, but you can use anything that has a 1/8 npt thread. There is also a spot for a thermistor to monitor cold end temps.
I noticed more and more people (including me) are having problems with faulty Revo heater cores... Mine just spikes up and down and causing printer halts. Even the PID tuning stops due to high temperature spikes. A new one is on its way... Gotta say, e3d is quite easy with a new replacement. Hope I get a V2 version or something.
I have a DIY IDEX printer, changing nozzels on my V6 can be a pain since Z offset can change. The Revo would be a great change for me, I can deal with the slight temperature variation.
@@shadow7037932 Yeah it has a probe on tool 0 but like I said it's IDEX IE: Dual hot ends/extruders. You set x/y/z offset of tool 1 to align it with tool 0 in klipper config file on the tool change macro.
Hmmm interesting, with Raptor it is exactly the opposite: LOWER the temperature by as much as 10 degrees compared to other hotends (i.e. printing ABS at 245 instead of 255 because 255 it was visible overheated). It uses ceramic ring heater as well, and thermistor (replaceable BTW) sits inside. I thought it will be the same with other hotends with ring heaters because it should heat filament more thoroughly, that's the theory, but it does not seem to be the case with Revo. To answer Stefan's question: apparently there's at least one company (Protoprint) which considers this temperature gradient effect from talking to them🙂
Now after six months of usage I can say, that I'm very satisfied with the Revo system. No more cloggs since then! And I switch my nozzles way more often than before. I highly recommend this system! Has anybody figured out an additional start- / end - gcode for a quicker nozzle change? I think, there must be a retraction at the end as long as the nozzle is hot enough to unload the filament.
The thermal transfer problems might be helped by a light dab of thermal grease inside the heater core. Would be interesting the see if it does anything the same way you tried to insulate the sock.
Grussgott Stefan, I do not change nozzles, I work on the same machine with PLA 1.75mm, 3mm, PETG same, PC, same, ABS 1.75mm, Hips 1.75mm, and PPS 1.75mm, so I change the entire block, hotend, nozzle, heatsink, in one simple move with my veteran tool swap system. It is a manual system that allows me to unplug everything in seconds, take the combo out and put new combo in (filament remains in the old combo extrusion system from reel through extruder pusher to nozzle, and the new combo is all filled up from begining like on a real tool changing macine, just this one is manually changing tools) so my core XY printer has two permanent extruders fitted, a 3mm and a 1.75mm, and I swap tools as needed in seconds. My dual water cooled head gantry machine same setup, unfortunatelly I cannot use the dual setup on the core XY because the original tronxy board has only 4 stepper drivers, for now... lol, but yes, I can interchange tools between them machines. My only not compatible for now machine is the old direct drive monstrousity that I use for printing elastic filament jobs. 3 direct drive heads, but I am about to eliminate one, I never use it in tripple filament setup. Now building the Rumba 6 axis machine 200X200 bed size to test it, and obviously will have the manual swap system incorporated for my convenience. So this new printhead for me is already obsolete, as the old printheads are even faster to hotswap on my machines.
I have recently (around Christmas 2021) changed my stock Ender 3 hot end for a Microswiss direct drive and full metal Hot-end, the Nozzles are hardened steel and it allows for temperatures to about 300°C, and I am quite happy with it, since now I can print TPU what a SHA of 85 and maybe even lower (still need to test Ninjaflex Chinchilla) even though it does come with it's own problems it is quite a good hot-end and I am very pleased with it, the Nozzles are more expensive at 17€, but they last much longer, I have printed wood, bronze, Ninjaflex sha 85, Extrudr NX2 PLA, and tons of PLA filaments, I have but one printer though and many people asking me to print something for them which leaves little time for testing other filaments, maybe I should finish my hypercube but I have hit a "builderblock" (Same as a writersblock but more for builders:-) )
with nozzle changes this easy, id bet someone out there is already working on a DIY auto nozzle swap system, maybe even with slicer plugins that let you select nozzle size without even touching the machine
Thanks for the in-depth review! Interestingly, I had a similar problem with the heater core, with temperatures jumping around during heat-up; although I only realized it after taking a closer look once you reported your problems on the Meltzone podcast. Contacted E3D support, they changed the heater core without problems, no issues since then. I gotta say, for me, the fact that you can swap nozzles without a) having to worry about wires breaking and b) afterwards having to re-adjust the live-z value is the feature I was looking for. I print a lot of stuff for board games, and tend to swap nozzles often (.25 for miniatures, .4 for boardgame terrain, .6 for everything practical). Especially for the miniatures, having a dialed-in live-z-value is important to get nice looking prints. On the old v6 hotend, re-adjusting this could take anywhere from 10 to 60mins. With Revo, I've only had to set that parameter once after installation, and never since, no matter how often I cahnged nozzles.
I also experienced a Revo thermistor problem while heating up. The reported temperature was jumping up and down at around 170 °C while the PLA in the nozzle was boiling and smoking. I had to press the reset button on my Prusa MK3 and let the hotend cool down. After that unsettling experience the hotend regained it's normal fuctionality and until now the problem has not repeated itself.
Being able to easily change a hot end was what interested myself. Having to do this Hot with two tools isn’t for me, so this looks really good. Thanks Laurie. NZ
Joining the v2.4 owners club soon I see. Wouldn’t expect to see a video about within 3-4 months minimum. The v2.4 is a beast with TONS of upgrades and thing to account for DO NOT STRESS IT. Also I hope that you go for a LDO kit rather than the formbot, LDO is far superior. Additionally if reading in the r/vorondesign ignore anything about slice engineering, the voron designers somehow were affected by slice legal action against patent infringement and got quite upset. Btw after your V0 video and Thomas sanladerers the community really started growing. Keep up the good work!
By your own phrasing, you clearly don't know what Slice actually did to sour their relationship with the team, so spare us your sanctimonious dismissal. On that note, Formbot is also a bunch of douches, so LDO FTW, even if their kits weren't far superior.
I preordered a Revo and using it on my MK3S. Because of the dual Fan Upgrade I made you can look directly on the nozzle and changing is a lot easier because there is no shroud in the way. :)
Half a year ago I posted here my satisfaction with the Revo system. This has changed completely. Within six weeks I had twice the problem, that my printing part didn’t stick to the heatbed and formed a huge bubble of PLA around the nozzle. Obviously it became so hot in there, that the nozzle and the heater blew up. I got the nozzle out of the heater only by heating it up. Other nozzles didn’t fit anymore, I had to replace them both. I will switch back.
The lack of hardened nozzles are a real deal-breaker for me and apparantly despite having supposedly been just around the corner. Its half a year later with still complete radio-silence from E3D. Worse yet is that due to the patenting you got no other options for the Revo but wait on them!! The longer they take, the harder a sell the Revo is becoming...
Thank you Stefan for your in-depth analysis. There are increasing reports of clogs when running PLA through the Revo Micro on the Prusa Mini using the E3D supplied fan. I believe this is heat creep due to the PWM fan speed reduction in the Mini firmware. If you can fit an analysis into your schedule, it would be very relevant.
I've had nothing but trouble with a Revo Micro, including 2 thermistor failures. This video gave some insight to what may be causing it. I seem to be in a minority of people having similar issues with it on a Prusa Mini but E3D don't see it as a warranty issue and won't refund.
I don't have the money for extra upgrades for my printer, but I like the ease of switching nozzles. I really think a silicone sock is an important accessory and they should make them.
What really surprises me is how well the heating and temperature sensing in V6 works. I always thought with the offset heater, the temperature sensor on the other side, etc, that the actual nozzle temperature would be way off compared to those circular heating elements. Turns out it works just fine.
Indeed, but it's all about your hotend thermistor tuning - I use a V6 with an oversized copper block and a 50w heater, and I had to do the heat-and-measure dance with an IR thermometer to fine-tune the thermistor profile. Thanks to having done that, though, and following up with a few PID tunes to fine-tune the software side, what the printer thinks the temp is and what the nozzle temp reads as with an outside sensor are within a couple degrees of each other.
Here is my biggest problem with Revo six, a hardened steel nozzle dosen't exsist for it, only brass, I don't really care using brass nozzle if I have to, but having hardened steel nozzle has two advantages for me, it allows me to use side cutter on it without damaging the nozzle, something that happened to me before, since I always scrap of the oozing before every print, and second of all as you may know, it allows people to print with special filament.
After watching you could basically do the same thing with the cr10 hotend. You just have to bring the heaterblock with it so one set screw and two wires.
Be aware of the hidden recurring cost! Even if you don't print with abrasives, nozzles are a consumable part that will need replaced. This design has the highest recurring cost of almost any hotend design out there. Don't be afraid to change the nozzle on your V6/clones. With a 3d printed torque wrench and a socket, it's not that hard compared to other aspects of maintenance. If you print with anything other than ABS or PETG, I would never rely on a Revo based printer as my only option. There are many perfectly good hotends that cost about the same as a pack of these nozzles, and not only are the replacement parts far more affordable, you can have a PTFE lined throat for if you want it. (All metal designs, such as the Revo, are not the best for PLA as it's prone to jam in them, and the higher temp range has no benefit to lower temp materials.) I disagree with the Revo on principle. I value open and modular designs, and it goes completely against that by not really being either.
I guess the next logical step would be to include the heater and thermistor into a quick-change nozzle, the same way the development has been for soldering iron tips...
While this is an innovative product, I feel like it's relatively expensive for the performance that you're getting. I think I fair middle ground, is the CHC series from Trianglelab. Similar heater block design, but works with standard heatbreaks and nozzles.
well that would flawlessly solve my current issue of constant seepage from the heater block. just need the hardened nozzles, the cr kit and a new motherboard to replace tronxy's so i can move the parts around the carriage assembly. adding some end g-code to extract the filament after every print is a trivial way to facilitate incredibly easy nozzle swaps. not needing to carefully wipe down a 250ºC heatblock covered in crusted over plastic lava would be nice too. surely E3d could just extend the integrated heatsock based on your feedback?
I need definitly different z-offset for 0.25 nozzle on textured bed (mk3s+). But actually different z-offset is no problem as long as same nozzle diameter alwas have same z-offset. Just write down z-offset for all 4 nozzle diameters, decide wich z-offset you store in the printer - than calculate the differences needed for the other nozzles. These differences you can store as z-offset in Prusa Slicer for the different printer profiles. Just to be done one time, so no big deal.
my best heatblock i cast using .999 silver precious metal clay with a thin 6mm threaded brass sleeve in the traditional configuration. amazing performance and thermal curves. the most difficult part was the sleeve.
Is it nice? Yes Is it an upgrade? No Unless I actively want slow printing speed and am doing half a dozen nozzle changes a day I can't see a reason to get a Revo to replace a v6. For me it'll stay with the straight upgrade to a mosquito, that nozzle change is done in seconds and it's not flow limited on most printers
Very interesting and extremly good video, as always! Im waiting for the abrasion resistant nozzles. But as soon as they get available ill swich to the revo on my prusa.
For me the main advantage is in the self contained heater core. Even with standard V6 nozzles that just makes nozzle changes easier. This video also introduced me to the phaetus rapido which looks like the best of both worlds.
Extruding the thermocouple into the nozzle to measure the gradient between the heatbreak and actual nozzle temps was brilliant. And so was the way you figured out the temperature gradient. I had tuned my Revo Hemera to run 15 degrees hotter, but I put it down to the massive inconsistencies between different batches of eSun ABS+ filament.
This is some top notch testing and terrific example of lateral thinking. Genuinely impressed with this review.
I tested all E-sun range of filaments 3 yers ago, got to the conclusion that I am better off after I sent them the results and they blamed.... me for trying to ruin their business. No more E-sun products anymore.
@@severpop8699 eSun ABS+, like most things Chinesium, tend to vary wildly from spool to spool. You absolutely must tune each spool for flow and temperature settings, and conduct layer adhesion tests or you are in for a bad time.
eSun filaments are essentially garbage, but garbage is cheap. So I use them for prototyping and to otherwise try out stuff. The actual final parts I plan to use are pritned in Polymaker ASA, ABS, or Nylon.
@@nachiketmhatre7411 The problem I encounterd was on PLA, PLA plus, PLA carbon fiber, PETG, PETG carbon fiber, ABS, TPU, HIPS, PC, PC carbon fiber from E-sun that in the same spool there were inconsintecies in temperature needed, suggesting the filament was extruded into a spool out of cross contaminated materials of different composition, I even burned some segments to see if I can smell the differecnde as filament burning progressed, and yes, it smelled like popcorn, than like nylon, than like ABS than again like popcorn in one meter.
This shows me their quality check is inexistent, they do not clean thir machines between batches, and whtever they have leftover in a bin they throw it in the next bin to save some Kg from being discharded, but they might throw in PLA ove ABS and over PC, they don't care.
The other Chinesium PLA, PETG, ABS etc have not this problem, they might differ from spool to spool, but not within the same spool, besides their pretty pricy filament behaves in printing and post printing worse than bloody chep competiton from the same country.
@@severpop8699 eSUN PA-CF is one of my favorite filaments. I like it better than carbon-X because its not nearly as brittle. Strong AF and looks really nice too!
@@severpop8699 I had been having good results with ESun but I have recently been very confused as to why I couldn't get good layer adhesion with my ESun rainbow filament. I thought I was going crazy since it still broke apart even at 230c! (PLA+).
The problem with changing nozzles is less the hassle of it and more that I'm scared I might screw it up and either over tighten it or not tighten it enough leaving plastic to sip in between the nozzle and heat break. I imagine the new system is a lot more newbie friendly than the existing nozzle system.
It's not a theoretical problem either. I destroyed a phaetus dragon doing exactly this.
There is an answer to this problem that is really simple : use torque wrench or torque screwdriver. There is even some that can be 3D printed. I never destroyed anything using the right tool.
If you're scared of that then get a torque wrench for installation, and make sure to always pre heat before removing.
Buy a torque wrench.
Torque wrench...
😂
I had no idea the new thermistor position had such a significant effect. Cool study!
"Cool study" - I see what you did there… ;-)
Thermistor has a huge effect. On my volcano hotend I drilled new hole for the termistor because the design is simply wrong.
The thermistor should touch the nozzle, the new design is trash
1) I love how thorough you are with testing. I don't think anyone else on UA-cam does it the way you do...thank you!
2) It seems like a lot of expense for benefits that may be rather minimal to a number of users. It seems that the #1 benefit is rapid nozzle changes, but I don't stress about performing nozzle changes, either on the Mk8 hot end on my Ender 3 or the Volcano on my Sidewinder X1. Having a palm ratchet instead of the basic tools that come with most printers maybe helps with that, of course, but those are relatively inexpensive and are useful for anyone with a V6, Mk8, Volcano, or other standard hot end. That kind of price tag for otherwise similar performance and a slightly increase in overall safety seems a bit much.
3) The inaccurate temperature thing might not affect normal printing performance (albeit after what might be a lengthy profile re-tuning process), but it is concerning that there doesn't seem to have been more thought put into how to account for the new thermal profile of the hot end.
4) The lack of licensing for clones is one more example of a seemingly growing trend back towards proprietary tech in 3D printing. The reasoning seems good this time, certainly compared to what Elegoo and ChiTuBox are trying to do with resin printing, but the end result is the same. We'd still be mired in the dark days of using $3,000 printers that are more finicky than a Rube Goldberg machine to print only ABS if it weren't for the massive amount of innovation that came from the open-source model that the industry has thrived on over the last several years.
Regarding 4, I would say we don't have to worry too much about it: E3D gets their deserved cash from it, until someone circumvents their patents with something cool, maybe even better. I feel like this industry itself, in general, cannot be dominated by proprietary solutions, given the technical understanding of the client base: the industries that need the machines that work 100% of the time (as if they did...) have always had different business models tied to ecosystems and different deals with those brands, hence the traditional 2D printer manufacturers thrive there but not with the other client base, us makers and tinkerers, that know how to circumvent BS moves they might try to pull, and would gladly buy a replacement Aliexpress board/part that solves the issue, which will be quickly available in that hypothetical scenario.
I do wonder about your real example tho of the resin printers, cause I know the Chitubox boards and LCD kits are being sold cheaply enough exactly to that client base that doesn't take the BS, but, I sort-of remember seeing alternatives on the same places that weren't tied down like that. Now I'm not entirely sure tho, so I'm not claiming anything.
It's not more expensive than comparable hotends. It can't be compared to a V6 clone; they don't have equivalent features. A lot of people consider a mosquito an alternative, and that's more than twice as expensive.
Comment on item 2: I have a prusa mk3s+ with the "staggered?" Heatbreak 2mm to 2.2mm. I've been plagued by jams 1 month after I got my printer. These jams are only happening in the heatbreak and no where near the nozzle, this has happened with pla and petg. Mostly with pla, petg not that often. I haven't printed any other materials because it's so frustrating to deal with this. I recently found out I can get a new heatbreak that's actually the original e3d one and it should prevents this. But I've been leaning towards just getting the revo and being done with it. I don't swap nozzle often, but if I do want to, I need to consider the fact that I might initiate jamming by messing with the hotend in anyway. And it almost always occurs. Which leads to a whole dismantling of thr hotend, heating up thr hearsink with a hest gun and trying to cold pull the stuck filament. (Have to dismantle because the bond tech gears mash and melt the filament directly below the gears so it can't move any further down even if the jam clears, and it can't be cold pulled all the way up because the blob doesn't fit out upwards through the filament sensor. I ripped out out once and sent the little ball and plastic piece of the filament sensor flying. So yea. Even though I don't replace nozzles often. I still see a huge benefit to this nozzle for myself.
The tool-less changing is really a game changer. I had some other nozzles laying around, but never used them because I was afraid to mess up. Since I installed the revo I print every piece on the most suitable detail level. Winning a lot of speed and print quality!
Long story short in favor of the Revo. The other day I wanted to change the nozzle on my Prusa i3. As usual I heated the hotend, held the heater block with a wrench with my left hand and used another 7 mm key with my right hand to unscrew the nozzle. But this time I didn't pay enough attention. During a fraction of a second, the wrench touched the exposed cables of the heater cartridge on the side (these cables are indeed EXPOSED because of their silly 90° orientation caused by how idiotic heater blocks have been designed). A short circuit ensued, with a visible and audible spark that cut one of the cables of the heater cartridge straight. After repair, I came to the sad conclusion that the motherboard (Einsy RAMBo) had been toasted by the spark too: there was no more voltage on the pins when asking the hotend to heat. This is a €150 repair, with 2× 1 week waiting for the parts, with excessive shipping costs. For such a bad heater block design, which I despised since the beginning even before I even had a problem with it. On my other printer (Voron 2.4) I went with another kind of hotend not so stupidly designed (a clone of the Mosquito, with a fixed, non-rotatable heater block). But for my Prusa I will seriously consider replacing the E3D V6 with a Revo when it is eventually repaired.
I have a Revo Six running on my Mk3s, having changed over from a Mosquito. I do a lot of nozzle size changes and the Mosquito was a good solution. The Revo nozzle changes are slower than with a Mosquito, but the tidy heater wiring and PTC heater are why I switched. As a bonus, the Revo stays much cleaner. The inevitable plastic mess never gets highter than the bottom of the Revo nozzle.
Iv'e had my Revo for a few weeks and I love it. I never liked changing nozzles in the past as I had bad luck with things breaking or leaking and it was just a pain, now it's painless. Thanks for your very detailed review and investigations.
I had a heater core fail too! Their RMA was amazing, new one sorted with little trouble.
My fails as well.
I had 2 fail. Both reporting temps about 40-50 deg lower than reality.
Currently throwing up a document about 3d printing extrusion systems. A big list for say. I appreciate your work a lot, always got great research. Keep it up Stefan!
This is exactly what wrong with those lists, you take these sponserd content and just repeat it.
@@thai9503 Nope, the revo is at the bottom of the list pretty much. It sucks compared to other options like the nf crazy, dragonfly, rapido, volcomosq, etc. I'm a real enthusiast with 8 printers and years of experience xD
@@munzlp this sounds really good! Do you have a channel or blog or something I can follow?
@@thai9503 yeah, my 3dp channel is called christmas3dp
Great review, thanks Stefan! What bothers me most when changing nozzles (I switch them a lot atm): re-adjusting Z-offsets. Will be interesting if the tolerances of the final production units eliminate that process 🧐
I swap mine between .6 and .4 often and see no Z change
You could use something like the Vorons do and set your z with an end stop triggered by the nozzle. That way, regardless of nozzle location, your offsets from the tip to the bed will be consistent.
@@heavenisalie lucky you. I went through last weekend calibrating my set. Seems the .25 and .8 are very similar in length, and thus similar Z offset. And then .4 and .6 have identical length, so again, same offset. But the difference between the two groups' lengths (and thus Z offsets) is about 0.2mm! Which is honestly quite a lot. Anyway, so I have basically different profiles on my Prusa so when I switch nozzles I also have to switch sheet settings.
@@shenqiangshou I would be contacting them for replacement IMO, I'll have to check the rest of my nozzles
I'd be fine with them being only in the same ballpark, so I'd just have to do slight adjustments instead of having to start from zero.
I loved the temperature in the nozzle and heat break test and graph!
Man, these sorts of features are exactly the thing we need in the hobby. Swapping nozzles is such a hassle, and it's not just about swapping sizes, but maybe other things, like swapping out clogged nozzles for unclogged ones or whatever. Shame there are no aftermarket solutions yet for abrasives, but I imagine they will come.
I do a ton of 3D printing for work (a yacht company). I only print in ASA plastic because its higher temp, UV resistant, and it sands really well. So for speed and strength purposes I only print in 0.6mm nozzles. I print large prints that get sanded and painted 99% of the time. I used to switch hotends to a .4mm nozzle for better resolution on smaller parts, but It became a pain so I just stuck with the 0.6mm for all prints. Since switching over to the revo, I switch between 0.4 and 0.6 2-3 times a week! Its such a game changer! Im a big fan!
Amazing video Stefan, thank you! I switched my MINI+ to Revo Micro as soon as it became available. I frequently switch between 0.25 / 0.4 / 0.6 mm nozzles and just got tired of the cycle times. Revo changed all that, especially with the additional retraction in end-gcode. That said I did notice a need for higher temperatures with certain filaments. I have a thermocouple multimeter here and thought about testing the temperatures, but I'm glad to see you did a far more thorough job! :o) Thanks again, and I have just bought Grammarly Premium 1yr through your affiliate link.
I tried to get a warranty for the heater core assembly that the thermistor failed on for my MK3S after little use. They made me jump through too many hoops and multiple correspondences. Finally gave up and purchased another assembly and it fixed the problem. Out $40. I could use a kit for my Mini but I am reluctant to do so after that. Otherwise it works great and convenient. Might as well forget trying to get a warranty.
I own a Revo Hemera and use it on my tuned Ender 3 pro... Thank you very much for the in depth high quality analysis of this system: I'll look over my temperature settings, especially because I have a slightly overpowered two fan part cooling setup.
I'm so grateful for content like this!
A Voron 2.4 Build planned? The boxes full of ABS parts most certainly look like it.
Yes @ 19:20
He mentions there is an upcoming build of one near the end.
I just bought a revo Hemera to replace my busted extruder on my CR10s Pro V2. Wasn’t looking at getting the Hemera, but then my extruder destroyed its self. Great video. I’ll have to watch / check my temperatures when setting everything up. I also wanted the revo because I do change nozzles a lot. I’m loving the idea that I may not have to do first layer calibrations every time too.
Keep up the great work
I for one have to give it a hard pass for a bunch of reasons with the most prominent one being the lack of backwards compatibility with the established V6 _Nozzle_ Standard allowing for outside innovations ( like the CHT Nozzles ) to be added to the system.
That's definitely something I'm not happy about either. Hope that their high flow nozzle has a similar performance as the CHT.
Agreed! Especially since the CHT nozzle works with Dragon high-flow which was already cheaper and faster than Revo before CHT came out.
Not to mention the fact that ecologically it's not terrible.
My go to response for these type of propriety nozzle, heater, thermistor solutions is a hard pass too. It is is easier to stay in the well known ecosystem and use common parts.
@@Tacks3D Same. It really could have been revolutionary if they had kept it open so it could become a new ecosystem for the whole industry. Probably would have made them more money in the long run too. Sad that this whole branch of innovation is now cut off.
A design patent only protects non-functional design features. Thus, everything that is "just looks" must be sufficiently different in a "clone".
But a hole in the middle, the outer diameter and length of the hot section, that cannot be a design patent. It could be a functional patent though.
(However note that Brompton bicycles seems to be very good at abusing their trademark of what their products looks like. Trademarks do not expire.
Well, there's the law as it is written and then there's the law as it is used. If someone offers clones on Amazon, E3D just has to wave their patent and Amazon will throw that seller of the platform. If a UA-camr reviews clone nozzles, E3D just has to wave their patent and UA-cam will take down the video and give the UA-camr a community guidelines strike. No one will go to court to challenge this because it's too expensive.
Yes, a functional patent, about the coupled nozzle and heatbreak combo that make the whole deal work as intended (otherwise the rapid change wouldn't function) is enough of an innovation to be functional-patented from what I imagine circles around the existing patents. So it would make no difference to Make some square shaped Rovo hotend if it's still a heatbreak nozzle combo.
From my reading they have left the cold side open source (it's the Hemera one anyway) but the hotend is their patent.
@@frankbauerful On the other side, "waving your patent" is quiet time consuming and expensive as well. Especially because all the cheap chinese knock off brands don't care about intellectual property and patents, anyway.
@@Rallyman240 Waving your patent requires nothing than having your lawyer send Amazon or UA-cam a letter
@@frankbauerful Amazon, UA-cam maybe, but won't stop AliExpress or eBay sellers, they won't even bother to change the shape to not violate the design patent...
WOW amazing work on this Stefan. The science that you present here, both technical and easy to digest.
Thanks for the deep technical insights 👍 I'm in doubt if it's worth to get this kit. It may good for people with no sense of torque in the hands and over screw the threads every nozzle swap.
The kit seems to offer only brass nozzles, I prefer also hardnerd steel for abrasive material. If the thermistor /heat element dies you had to throw away the whole heat block. That is not in the sense of savings precious raw materials.
What about if the kit nozzle unit gets clogged? How can you clean it? A single nozzle you can change or clean relative easily.
PS : if the punched numbers on conventional nozzles are no more readable because of burned plastic, heat it up and clean it with a little brass-wire brush. The you can sing "I can see clearly now..."
There is an unofficial high-flow Revo, and it is the Phaetus Rapido hotend... It uses the same ring-heater approach but with an incredible 115W of heating, it can achieve flow rates of 45 mm^3/s with a standard V6 nozzle and supports a one-hand nozzle swap, as the heating core is bolted to the heat sink with 3 titanium screws. It's like a fusion of E3D Volcano, E3D Revo and SE Copperhead, costs less than either, and is powerful/durable AF.
i didn't realize that the rapido used standard v6's. that's actually really baller and way more of the kind of thing I was expecting out of the genuine Revo
Sounds like a winner, for the price the negatives don't seem to bad. I'm already far into the mosquito setup & very happy with it, but it & the nozzles are far from cheap, but no problems either. I love all the testing you do & data you present so well, thank you!
The temperature disparity is actually a deal breaker for me. Many of my prints rely on airflow and speed changes to achieve desired properties and inaccurate temperature that will vary based on the amount of airflow is a no go for me.
And the only solution to that would be extensive testing to find the temperature gradient based on airflow, compared to just running an already working system, no thanks.
The process of 3D printing is a bit like cooking-that is, purely empirical.
Achieving desired results isn't just about turning knobs and punching in in absolute vales. You have to run calibration prints and modify the settings in a closed feedback loop of tuning.
You did the same with your existing hot end. If you were to run the same tests on your hot end, you will find similar deviation from the expected results.
I had run my battery of calibration prints and I had set my Revo Hemera to print at 265°C, as opposed to the 250°C of the V6 hot end attached to it. At the end of the day, this really doesn't affect your prints, because you are going to recalibrate everything.
Actually If you do not use a coefficient to adjust for inaccuracies of Thermistor your Temperature reading will be most likely be wrong. Duet offers do change the Steinhart coefficient (C) to adjust for inaccuracies. Secondly depending on variable printing speed you use (for instance faster infill than perimeter etc.) I can assure you that the filament will not reach the temperature you set on your LCD. One thing is to measure the nozzle temperature the other is the actual temperature of the filament you are extruding. I highly doubt that you will see a significant difference between Revo and the current hotend you are using.
@@maximilian.arnold precisely. There are too many variables that affect the actual printing process apart from temperature recorded in the nozzle.
Absolute numbers are good relative indicators to nudge you along in the right direction, but at the end of the day, you must rely on the empirical process of calibration and print tuning.
Yeah this is actually quite surprising, thank you Stefan for the investigation and discovery. I actually bought the whole damn thing but haven't had time to install it yet. Now I am wondering if I should put it on my main workhorse mk3s, or put it on my tinkerbot. Sigh.
For me, V6 is the best because I can use literally any type of third-party nozzle, and I can easily machine custom heating blocks. However, as someone who’s recently had a two-and-a-half-day print fail at work due to a V6 heatbreak that had come loose and filled the head with PLA gloop, I certainly see the benefit of a more sealed and reliable unit. Pity we won’t see third-party nozzles.
Literally just got my Hemera Revo. So for.... it's going OK.
The dirty secret probably explains why my nozzle clogged on my first print until I upped the temp a bit.
I have a E3D volcano. I designed to change the whole body(cooler, nozzle, block, heater, ntc) in 1-2 minutes. No need to wait to cool down but you need ready spare one.
the engineering that went into this is so cool. i'd love to get one, just costs a bit too much being a student, maybe in the future
15:38 wow that's an amazing illustration
Revo & MMU2 combo works really well for me, by default the MMU2 removes filament on print finish so it's perfect for nozzle swaps (I know this can be done via gcode too for non MMU printers)
I have broken wires changing nozzles as well, this looks like a nice solution. Great video!
I just dont see the "improvements" being worth the extra cost. Especially since you're basically locking yourself into their echosystem.
For example I like using the CHT with my hemera. And I can use a vast array of nozzles with it. And even now theres a lack of nozzles. Sure more are coming.... but when? And how much will they be. Im just not feeling it tbh and im a huge fan of e3d.
That test for temperate gradient within the nozzle is clever. 👍
I've experienced two (2!) thermistors failing in the Revo Micro - not sure what is going on, but they were manufactured in Dec 2021 and Feb 2022. I get the "Verify Heater" message in klipper f/w for my V2.4.
Great review, thanks! I have Revo Micro on my Prusa Mini and the ease of nozzle changing is fantastic. No more “this is big part, 0.6 would be better, but I’m too lazy to change nozzle”. This works very well.
What is this speed test?
I love the graphics in this video, great job and thank you so much for the effort!
Glad you like them!
thanks for the video - I love the Revo micro on my Prusa mini - the quick nozzle change is fantastic.
Tiny production details... such as the muted SPROING sound effects during spring flicking... are admired and appreciated
My printer runs a E3D V6, but I'll be watching to see whether the Revo becomes a solid contender for aggressive materials, and of course whether the higher nozzle prices are justified by better performance.
I have 3 prusas. mk3s+ with revo, mk3s+ with Olsson ruby, mk2.5s with E3d V6. For met the revo is clearly better. Nicer print results, heats faster, cools faster. Better cooling of the part ( revo hotend is smaller).Easy nozzle swipe. I highly recommend it, even if the temperature according to this study has a deviation.
I switched to the Revo on my MK3S/MMU2S a few weeks ago and love it. I have damaged the thermister before on the old system while changing nozzles so I was always gun shy about doing it too often, but now with the Revo I will decide on the best nozzle size for nearly every print. And since the MMU2 retracts the filament automatically after printing, I don't have to wait for the heating and cooling cycle. I will mention that I did notice a slight length difference when swapping nozzles, so a minor Z calibration is still needed. I just record the offset numbers for each nozzle so it isn't a big deal.
For us MMU users I've also seen reports that tip forming requires less ramming with Revo - and no specific Prusa "MMU" heatbreak anymore either.
Good review, not from another E3D fanboy. Although 16mm^3/s is nothing, so I hope the HF is at least double that (though it is likely only around 24mm^3/s). And the temperature instability with cooling should be highlighted/tested more
16 mm³/s is for the 0.4mm nozzle. You'll probably be able to push it harder with the bigger sizes.
Stephan, thanks for all the good work. I have two revos which are back out of the printers I put them into (Vorons). I found the cold extrusion to be a real problem. My extruder was 30-40C colder (as measured with a Fluke 87V with a type K thermocouple) than reported. This created unusable parts. So temporarily I have put my Phaetus Dragon HF back in and have been watching to see others experiences.
This is amazing work ! Btw I’ve shared with you on Facebook messenger my test results of the Dragon HF hotend with the CHT nozzle and it’s pretty amazing. 27mm^3/sec with only 3-4% extrusion loss.
I wasn't really sure if I wanted a Revo, after all both my Mini and MK3S+ print perfectly fine with the v6 nozzles. Replacing the nozzle on the MK3S+ isn't that much of a hazzle anymore after I got the right tools (16 mm wrench and torque screwdriver), but I do remove the fan shroud to get easier access which makes it a little more work. I did not replace a nozzle on my Mini yet, mostly because I didn't have to and didn't want to mess with the different style heater block.
That said - I have ordered two Revos now - one Micro for the Mini, because it is supposed to be lighter (not sure if that's still the case with the 2nd revision of the hotend that uses the original fan) which should help with the cantilevered axis.
The second one is a Revo Six replacement for the MK3S+ so I'm able to use the same nozzles as for the Mini, but more importantly because I have seen reports that the Revo nozzles form better tips and need less ramming which will help with MMU2s prints. Since the MMU setup always retracts the filament from the hotend at the end of a print, it's also very convenient to replace the nozzle at any time.
I didn't notice the strain relief on the heater core, so that's good. I have damaged the wires on those cartridges, so this is a welcome upgrade. Plus I don't have to worry about damaging the wires with a crescent wrench. Once the local filament/parts shop started selling Revo, I ordered one immediately because the office MK3S started very slowly leaking scorched filament and depositing it on prints.
I personally am testing/using a hotend that consists of a V6 heat sink, a titanium heat break/throat and a Maxiwatt heating cylinder/donut. It is very fast to heat even at 40W standard (0-220 in something like 46 seconds) seems to keep the heat well (even without a silicone sock as I can't find one for the 10mm by 20mm diameter disc shape) I enjoy it a lot, but the conversion required a new mount, and part cooling required printed ducts to get things going, which became quite a challenge when everything was mis-matched.
The only real complaint I have about the Maxiwatt is the lack of strain relief, so the wires can get damaged quite easily, rendering a "heat block" (donut) useless.
My only upset was the nozzle price, at nearly $15 US to replace if something happened, clogs and issues that normally are a "just get a new nozzle" approach are no longer available.
I look forward to your Voron build video. I have been ordering parts to build a 2.4, and have not gotten to the head yet - I may just go with this from the start.
Im in a similar situation, ive almost finished my v2.4 build with a revo. Still missing the bed but fermio should soon restock those.
I put a hardened nozzle in my mk3s the day I assembled it and have never changed it since. I primarily print CF Nylon so at the moment Revo is a no go and the not actually quick, quick change isn't a 'feature' I'd need.
I think the point is that people don't change nozzles often because it's a pain. So you just pick one nozzle as a compromise for all prints.
If you could swap easily, you would save lots of time on draft prints, and do a lot more high-detail parts that aren't worth the effort right now.
I've looked long and hard at the pre-order, and so far haven't ordered.
what I like most about it is that the heater/thermistor block has decent strain relief, and finally some thought has been given to decent cable routing. I run a titan aero atm, and routed the cables through the mount. there is literally a cm of space in between the bed and the body of the extruder, and there should be room for a part cooler as well. If you have a volcano, the cables go up, which is not bad, but then they have to make 2 hard right angle turns to go anywhere useful. Revo is not perfect here, but it is a step in the right direction, and for this alone i was, and probably in the future still am, willing to give E3D my money. it must be said however that Omniadrop was the first to do this, not E3D, and their heaterblock is v6 compatible.
what i dislike is the fact that in between launch and pre-order, there was the CHT nozzle. This seems like a marked evolution in hot end tech, more so than the slight rearrangement that Revo gives. CHT seems to improve on nearly all aspects of delivery, and it's incompatible with Revo because of the patent situation. and yes, i am aware that CHT is licensed as well, and it wasn't invented by Bondtech. What i don't see is a way to integrate CHT with Revo other than making a nozzle break with a blind M6 hole like we've always had. Quite frankly, if E3D makes that, i'm buying.
as for the quick swap. I'll use it more than swapping nozzles. mostly because i'm not an organised person and nozzles go missing, and they get dirty enough to be unidentifiable, even with socks.
I didn’t want to wait for one so I bought a mosquito and I love it. The vanadium nozzles are great and switching nozzles with slice’s torque wrench takes what seems like half the time as the v6. I don’t worry about breaking a thermistor wire or having a loose nozzle because everything is rigidly mounted and the heater block doesn’t rotate. I should have done it a long time ago.
The Mosquito is the perfect hotend. Hands down. Combined with a vanadium or better yet, tungsten carbide nozzle, and it will literally print anything with no wear whatsoever. Tungsten is a one and done nozzle. Install it and it will outlast the printer. Nothing scratches it. It eats carbon fiber nylon like candy, no wear at all.
excellent detailed video! 👏
Brilliant review, again, Stefan. I, too, have messed up either the thermistor wires or cross-threaded the steel nozzle and/or heat block on my Swiss-Micro all metal hot end (CR-10S). I have been considering a change, and do appreciate the integrated and strained relieved thermistor, to something with a rapid-change nozzle. I'll keep watching E3D for the Revo-CR nozzle kits (currently on back-order). Thanks!
Excellent work! The thermistor position issue is unfortunate. It’ll be a pain if you have to adjust the extrusion temp as a function of part cooling. OTOH, as you say, this might also be a factor with other hot ends; something I’ll have to pay attention to in my printing.
Given that, I’m surprised that it performed better than the original at high flow rates; that’s a good thing!
I do like the idea of it being easier to change nozzle sizes; I almost never change mine because it’s such a hassle :-/
For those of you that have the ubiquitous V6 nozzle, I have a water cooling solution that is drop-in with the same length and everything. No more blowing hot air across your heat sink! I have a few version 2 prototypes that I can send out, and only one version 3 that is amazing, but the cost might be too high to machine, so I just have it on my printer. If there is enough interest in them, I can get them batch made and have them at a reasonable price for you all. They take 1/8 npt fittings so you can choose the diameter of tubing. I use 8mm od tube, but you can use anything that has a 1/8 npt thread. There is also a spot for a thermistor to monitor cold end temps.
I noticed more and more people (including me) are having problems with faulty Revo heater cores... Mine just spikes up and down and causing printer halts. Even the PID tuning stops due to high temperature spikes. A new one is on its way... Gotta say, e3d is quite easy with a new replacement. Hope I get a V2 version or something.
I have a DIY IDEX printer, changing nozzels on my V6 can be a pain since Z offset can change. The Revo would be a great change for me, I can deal with the slight temperature variation.
Do you not have mesh bed leveling?
@@shadow7037932 Yeah it has a probe on tool 0 but like I said it's IDEX IE: Dual hot ends/extruders. You set x/y/z offset of tool 1 to align it with tool 0 in klipper config file on the tool change macro.
Hmmm interesting, with Raptor it is exactly the opposite: LOWER the temperature by as much as 10 degrees compared to other hotends (i.e. printing ABS at 245 instead of 255 because 255 it was visible overheated). It uses ceramic ring heater as well, and thermistor (replaceable BTW) sits inside. I thought it will be the same with other hotends with ring heaters because it should heat filament more thoroughly, that's the theory, but it does not seem to be the case with Revo. To answer Stefan's question: apparently there's at least one company (Protoprint) which considers this temperature gradient effect from talking to them🙂
Now after six months of usage I can say, that I'm very satisfied with the Revo system. No more cloggs since then! And I switch my nozzles way more often than before. I highly recommend this system!
Has anybody figured out an additional start- / end - gcode for a quicker nozzle change? I think, there must be a retraction at the end as long as the nozzle is hot enough to unload the filament.
The thermal transfer problems might be helped by a light dab of thermal grease inside the heater core. Would be interesting the see if it does anything the same way you tried to insulate the sock.
Grussgott Stefan,
I do not change nozzles, I work on the same machine with PLA 1.75mm, 3mm, PETG same, PC, same, ABS 1.75mm, Hips 1.75mm, and PPS 1.75mm, so I change the entire block, hotend, nozzle, heatsink, in one simple move with my veteran tool swap system.
It is a manual system that allows me to unplug everything in seconds, take the combo out and put new combo in (filament remains in the old combo extrusion system from reel through extruder pusher to nozzle, and the new combo is all filled up from begining like on a real tool changing macine, just this one is manually changing tools) so my core XY printer has two permanent extruders fitted, a 3mm and a 1.75mm, and I swap tools as needed in seconds. My dual water cooled head gantry machine same setup, unfortunatelly I cannot use the dual setup on the core XY because the original tronxy board has only 4 stepper drivers, for now... lol, but yes, I can interchange tools between them machines. My only not compatible for now machine is the old direct drive monstrousity that I use for printing elastic filament jobs. 3 direct drive heads, but I am about to eliminate one, I never use it in tripple filament setup.
Now building the Rumba 6 axis machine 200X200 bed size to test it, and obviously will have the manual swap system incorporated for my convenience.
So this new printhead for me is already obsolete, as the old printheads are even faster to hotswap on my machines.
A review like would also really useful for the MK4 Nexttruder solution to see how it compares. 🤔
Oh I didn't know you were doing a 2.4! I have built 4 now and absolutely love them!
Still need to upgrade mine to the new After burner
I’m going back and forth on building a rat rig or a voron, what are your thoughts about the 2.4?
I have recently (around Christmas 2021) changed my stock Ender 3 hot end for a Microswiss direct drive and full metal Hot-end, the Nozzles are hardened steel and it allows for temperatures to about 300°C, and I am quite happy with it, since now I can print TPU what a SHA of 85 and maybe even lower (still need to test Ninjaflex Chinchilla) even though it does come with it's own problems it is quite a good hot-end and I am very pleased with it, the Nozzles are more expensive at 17€, but they last much longer, I have printed wood, bronze, Ninjaflex sha 85, Extrudr NX2 PLA, and tons of PLA filaments, I have but one printer though and many people asking me to print something for them which leaves little time for testing other filaments, maybe I should finish my hypercube but I have hit a "builderblock" (Same as a writersblock but more for builders:-) )
with nozzle changes this easy, id bet someone out there is already working on a DIY auto nozzle swap system, maybe even with slicer plugins that let you select nozzle size without even touching the machine
Always love your videos, these hotends look great.
Still waiting your prusa mini review jajaja
Thanks for the in-depth review! Interestingly, I had a similar problem with the heater core, with temperatures jumping around during heat-up; although I only realized it after taking a closer look once you reported your problems on the Meltzone podcast. Contacted E3D support, they changed the heater core without problems, no issues since then.
I gotta say, for me, the fact that you can swap nozzles without a) having to worry about wires breaking and b) afterwards having to re-adjust the live-z value is the feature I was looking for. I print a lot of stuff for board games, and tend to swap nozzles often (.25 for miniatures, .4 for boardgame terrain, .6 for everything practical). Especially for the miniatures, having a dialed-in live-z-value is important to get nice looking prints. On the old v6 hotend, re-adjusting this could take anywhere from 10 to 60mins. With Revo, I've only had to set that parameter once after installation, and never since, no matter how often I cahnged nozzles.
Thank you! Wonderfully done, and you asnwered all my questions I was considering. I am doing a custom upgrade for a Fokoos Odin-5 hot end assembly.
Finally someone did the temperature test through the heatbreak!
I also experienced a Revo thermistor problem while heating up. The reported temperature was jumping up and down at around 170 °C while the PLA in the nozzle was boiling and smoking. I had to press the reset button on my Prusa MK3 and let the hotend cool down. After that unsettling experience the hotend regained it's normal fuctionality and until now the problem has not repeated itself.
Being able to easily change a hot end was what interested myself. Having to do this Hot with two tools isn’t for me, so this looks really good. Thanks Laurie. NZ
What fantastic information! Stephan you are a titan among men in the 3D world.
Thank you.
Joining the v2.4 owners club soon I see. Wouldn’t expect to see a video about within 3-4 months minimum. The v2.4 is a beast with TONS of upgrades and thing to account for DO NOT STRESS IT. Also I hope that you go for a LDO kit rather than the formbot, LDO is far superior. Additionally if reading in the r/vorondesign ignore anything about slice engineering, the voron designers somehow were affected by slice legal action against patent infringement and got quite upset. Btw after your V0 video and Thomas sanladerers the community really started growing. Keep up the good work!
By your own phrasing, you clearly don't know what Slice actually did to sour their relationship with the team, so spare us your sanctimonious dismissal. On that note, Formbot is also a bunch of douches, so LDO FTW, even if their kits weren't far superior.
idk what any of these extruders are
The best review on the Revo anywhere! Thanks!
Im really interested in your Voron 2.4 build. Are you doing a review? I hope so.
Great video. Just got got one and it’s good to know about temp difference.
I preordered a Revo and using it on my MK3S. Because of the dual Fan Upgrade I made you can look directly on the nozzle and changing is a lot easier because there is no shroud in the way. :)
Half a year ago I posted here my satisfaction with the Revo system. This has changed completely. Within six weeks I had twice the problem, that my printing part didn’t stick to the heatbed and formed a huge bubble of PLA around the nozzle. Obviously it became so hot in there, that the nozzle and the heater blew up. I got the nozzle out of the heater only by heating it up. Other nozzles didn’t fit anymore, I had to replace them both. I will switch back.
The lack of hardened nozzles are a real deal-breaker for me and apparantly despite having supposedly been just around the corner. Its half a year later with still complete radio-silence from E3D. Worse yet is that due to the patenting you got no other options for the Revo but wait on them!!
The longer they take, the harder a sell the Revo is becoming...
Thank you Stefan for your in-depth analysis. There are increasing reports of clogs when running PLA through the Revo Micro on the Prusa Mini using the E3D supplied fan. I believe this is heat creep due to the PWM fan speed reduction in the Mini firmware. If you can fit an analysis into your schedule, it would be very relevant.
I've had nothing but trouble with a Revo Micro, including 2 thermistor failures. This video gave some insight to what may be causing it. I seem to be in a minority of people having similar issues with it on a Prusa Mini but E3D don't see it as a warranty issue and won't refund.
Heating the bed always takes longer than the nozzle. Laughs in 700W keenovo.
Great review as always.
the review i was waiting for, thanks!
I don't have the money for extra upgrades for my printer, but I like the ease of switching nozzles. I really think a silicone sock is an important accessory and they should make them.
What really surprises me is how well the heating and temperature sensing in V6 works. I always thought with the offset heater, the temperature sensor on the other side, etc, that the actual nozzle temperature would be way off compared to those circular heating elements. Turns out it works just fine.
Indeed, but it's all about your hotend thermistor tuning - I use a V6 with an oversized copper block and a 50w heater, and I had to do the heat-and-measure dance with an IR thermometer to fine-tune the thermistor profile. Thanks to having done that, though, and following up with a few PID tunes to fine-tune the software side, what the printer thinks the temp is and what the nozzle temp reads as with an outside sensor are within a couple degrees of each other.
Here is my biggest problem with Revo six, a hardened steel nozzle dosen't exsist for it, only brass, I don't really care using brass nozzle if I have to, but having hardened steel nozzle has two advantages for me, it allows me to use side cutter on it without damaging the nozzle, something that happened to me before, since I always scrap of the oozing before every print, and second of all as you may know, it allows people to print with special filament.
Definitely not buying a patented nozzle system. Thanks for mentioning that!
After watching you could basically do the same thing with the cr10 hotend. You just have to bring the heaterblock with it so one set screw and two wires.
Be aware of the hidden recurring cost! Even if you don't print with abrasives, nozzles are a consumable part that will need replaced. This design has the highest recurring cost of almost any hotend design out there. Don't be afraid to change the nozzle on your V6/clones. With a 3d printed torque wrench and a socket, it's not that hard compared to other aspects of maintenance.
If you print with anything other than ABS or PETG, I would never rely on a Revo based printer as my only option. There are many perfectly good hotends that cost about the same as a pack of these nozzles, and not only are the replacement parts far more affordable, you can have a PTFE lined throat for if you want it. (All metal designs, such as the Revo, are not the best for PLA as it's prone to jam in them, and the higher temp range has no benefit to lower temp materials.)
I disagree with the Revo on principle. I value open and modular designs, and it goes completely against that by not really being either.
I guess the next logical step would be to include the heater and thermistor into a quick-change nozzle, the same way the development has been for soldering iron tips...
While this is an innovative product, I feel like it's relatively expensive for the performance that you're getting. I think I fair middle ground, is the CHC series from Trianglelab. Similar heater block design, but works with standard heatbreaks and nozzles.
I just took the wrong bus because the video was so interesting.....
Great information as always 👍
😍
I have a mosquito/bmg clone and like it's dimensions (very low in Z) and easy nozzle swap too.
It runs beautifully, never change a running system :D
well that would flawlessly solve my current issue of constant seepage from the heater block. just need the hardened nozzles, the cr kit and a new motherboard to replace tronxy's so i can move the parts around the carriage assembly. adding some end g-code to extract the filament after every print is a trivial way to facilitate incredibly easy nozzle swaps. not needing to carefully wipe down a 250ºC heatblock covered in crusted over plastic lava would be nice too.
surely E3d could just extend the integrated heatsock based on your feedback?
I need definitly different z-offset for 0.25 nozzle on textured bed (mk3s+). But actually different z-offset is no problem as long as same nozzle diameter alwas have same z-offset. Just write down z-offset for all 4 nozzle diameters, decide wich z-offset you store in the printer - than calculate the differences needed for the other nozzles. These differences you can store as z-offset in Prusa Slicer for the different printer profiles. Just to be done one time, so no big deal.
my best heatblock i cast using .999 silver precious metal clay with a thin 6mm threaded brass sleeve in the traditional configuration. amazing performance and thermal curves. the most difficult part was the sleeve.
Is it nice? Yes
Is it an upgrade? No
Unless I actively want slow printing speed and am doing half a dozen nozzle changes a day I can't see a reason to get a Revo to replace a v6.
For me it'll stay with the straight upgrade to a mosquito, that nozzle change is done in seconds and it's not flow limited on most printers
Very interesting and extremly good video, as always! Im waiting for the abrasion resistant nozzles. But as soon as they get available ill swich to the revo on my prusa.
Looking forward to them as well!
For me the main advantage is in the self contained heater core. Even with standard V6 nozzles that just makes nozzle changes easier. This video also introduced me to the phaetus rapido which looks like the best of both worlds.
Rapido is so nice
High flow rates
And one hand nozzle change