Starfield's Biggest Update Yet From MrMattyPlays - Luke Reacts
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 чер 2024
- 👉🏼 LINKS: linktr.ee/lukestephens 👈🏼
--
Luke Stephens is a Content-Creator and Streamer that co-streams on UA-cam and Twitch. This channel has Live Stream clips and highlights in addition to the streams themselves. Check out Luke's main channel & other content by going to: linktr.ee/lukestephens !!
MrMattyPlays' Original Video: • Starfield's "Biggest" ...
Show Matty Some Love: / @mrmattyplays
--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#gaming #LukeStephens #ps5 #xbox - Розваги
Matty isn’t going down with ship-he’s clipping right through it mid cutscene.
😂
I'd rather him be optimistic than pessimistic, honestly. If it means breaking the cutscene, I think it's a better mindset to have, not saying that you don't think that.
Starfield has cured my insomnia, to me it is so boring and empty that after playing 5 mins of it, it puts me straight to sleep. Thats the only good thing I can say about it in my opinion.
Lol
literally same with me, i was dozzing off like more than 5 times when playing the game then go straight to my bed
Go play cod an fifa
@@Abou_Huraira_Productiongo play cod and fifa
Calm down bro you ain’t as cool as you think…
The fact that they spent 8 years making starfield is the real travesty.
Imagine how good FO5 could've been if all the money and time from SF went into it..
We all know they didn’t spend 8 years on it. Not even half of it, to be quite honest.
"it takes time" yea and they took their sweet time just for it to be a mediocre buggy game at best
@@ryanvandoren1519 probably not too good, as long as Emil was at the helm.
That`s what they say, IMO they took 2 years at best, remember this game was supposed to be released in 2022? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
The whole game lacks vision, everything is copied and pasted from previous Bethesda Titles.
-The grenades are from Fallout IV, and the quick menu access is from Fallout IV. Even the freaking computer sounds are from Fallout IV.
-Starborn powers are Skyrim shouts, they didn`t even bother making dungeons to acquire the power, just flew in zero G hitting sparkly dust, there, good enough.
-Fetch quests, the whole game is a fetch quest simulator, seriously just do an outside perspective without paying attention to the Lore, is literally - go get this, put there, go get 2 of these, go get 2 of that, mix and put here, now bring this there, that`s the whole game.
-We have how many companions in Starfield? How many we had in Fallout IV and Skyrim again? I remember J`zargo more than I remember Sara and I`ve spent way more time with Sara.
-Ships can only fit 50 or so components, can`t build star yards, no companions can fly ships, Cora keeps talking about books every time I land, almost throwing her into an airlock.
-Companion questlines are, boring, and uninteresting, in fact, you can only do 2 of them every playthrough because how you acquire their approval is very limited. I`m literally meddling with a divorced couple in Sam`s questline, my brother in Christ, that`s not fun, that`s not engaging, I`m here to shoot aliens, not hear adults bitching.
-And IMO the worst sin this game has, remember the Red Mile? That you do a dangerous run and get paid? Well, I did it the 30 times required so you can beat the record holder, thinking to myself it would lead to a nice weapon, a title, maybe recognition... I got a 2 line dialogue from the previous record holder and a regular rare rifle with no perks on it, that`s it, the game hints at "Amazing rewards" and it`s not there, it's unfinished lazy garbage.
The difference between Starfield and Cyberpunk was that the core game of Cyberpunk has been great since day one. While 2.0 was a huge update it didn't really substantially change any of the game's mechanics. The fundamental aspects of the game that made gunplay, the gameplay loop, and most importantly the writing great were there since the beginning. The post launch updates and 2.0 basically created a more polished and streamlined version of that. On the other hand Starfield has foundational issues with things like questing, exploration, writing, and how the game is built/coded that can never be fixed. You aren't gonna be able to just simply patch in a system of actually meaningful content to fill its thousands of planets or fix badly written characters and questlines. BSG can add more content over time for sure and that will make Starfield more enjoyable for sure but at its core problems will always hold the game down.
Well said and I agree with you
Nailed it!
The biggest problem is with the company's mentality. Bathesda is a AAA company with the mentality of AA.
@@rahulsar2030 I wish. Most AA studios are still in a place where they are hungry and eager to make something big and great (even if they don't quite have the budget or manpower to pull it off). That's just not Bethesda.
Bethesda is a unique product of the "Bethesda pass". For so many decades, and over so many games, their fans kept giving them a pass for shoddy work. Game's full of bugs? Game crashes all the damn time? Game can't even be completed due to broken quests? Game engine barely works and graphics still look like a 360 game? No problem! We forgive you Bethesda! The modders will fix it, this is fine.. this is just fine..
That is what bred Bethesda's crappy mentallity. If you can just make whatever junk you feel like making, and all these idiots will buy millions of copies, and not even complain when it doesen't work, then why bother making anything good? The fanboys will eat up any old Toddslop they are served, so why aim any higher than that? Just make Toddslop. It sells.
For context, I enjoyed and continue to enjoy both games. That being said, there was heaps of criticism towards Cyberpunk 2077 from day one, including its "great core". There were numerous people criticising the lack of impact a majority of decisions in Cyberpunk had, the relatively generic characters, gunplay that was decent but fairly cookie cutter, underwhelming hacking/cyberware, terrible vehicle handling, lack of immersion in the city through dumb npcs/lack of real police/lack of any sort of reaction to the player in any big ways, fairly repetitive quest design, poor performance, etc. These are just a few of the criticisms, I'm sure I have missed some. While some of them have since been fixed, I think people are quick to forget and quick to criticise. Not to sound cynical but a lot of the renewed positivity in Cyberpunk was in large part due to the Edgerunners anime, which fuelled excitement for an expansion that ended up being quite good. BGS may not ever have the same redemption arc but I also think people refuse to give it the chance to win us back, which Cyberpunk didn't receive until relatively recently. In the perfect world, we would just get games that work, unfortunately, this is our timeline.
Pretty smart of Matty to add the qualifier, "What Bethesda says will be...(the biggest update)". With Cyberpunk, CDR made it clear that they got the message about the game being crap. BGS is signalling the opposite: "The problem isn't the game, it's the players". Every PR move they've made points to this. BGS will do tiny little things, while hoping the mod community will fix the worst of it, and add something to fulfill their DLC commitments, and then it'll be full on MT focus til the last person logs off. F76 shows us this roadmap, already.
Very good point. By this same point in CP2077's post-launch life, CDPR had already offered a massive apology and a very generous refund policy across all platforms (which is why Sony de-listed the game initially), had released close to a dozen significant hotfixes & 2 major patches.....all whilst dealing with the fallout of a major hack of their computer network. Meanwhile, BGS has spent most of the last 4 months creating ChatGPT replies to negative reviews and releasing 2 patches to Skyrim that have broken mods each time 😆.
At this point it's best to uninstall, forget about Starfield and maybe be pleasantly surprised one day... I still believe that we need a lot more "writing" and gameplay to help glue the game together into a coherent experience. The game is lacking to an insane degree. Had to mod the hell out the gameplay loop that slowed down all of the busy work. I can't explain how I could spend 600 hours on it. Found myself modding more and playing less, week by week and now I don't feel like playing it at all (o.O)
Funny thing is that's usually the case anyway, we end up spending more time modding our game than actually playing it, because oftentimes while we are modding our game we run into a bunch of fucking conflicts and sometimes the tools that we use don't tell us which mod is causing the problem, and we end up having to check an uncheck mods down or load order in order to figure out which one is fucking it up, unfortunately that's what modding is all about, eventually we get to that perfect tear list where it all just works like Todd Howard says, it just takes us a fuckload of time to make a stable good experience.
Starfield doesn’t deserve a redemption. Nor did Cyberpunk. It’s best to uninstall, forget about it, and never touch it again
@@istealpopularnamesforlikes3340relax
I did this with Cyberpunk after being on the hype train for years and it definitely soothed the burn and ended up being a really nice surprise
The game’s mechanics and its world are forever fucked. Mods may help a little but the way you “travel” in space is not fixable. The world is limited by design in a way that leaves little room for improvement.
Literally every system in Mass Effect 1 was better than Starfield. Better dialogue. Better quests. Better planet exploration when mining materials (with vehicles). Better inventory system. Better companion interaction with consequences of choice.
Yep, pretty amazing that BGS made a game that is less innovative than a game made over 12 years ago.
Just played the legendary edition, great games and the story is interesting from the start. Did not feel that with starfield.
Can we stop giving excuses to a billion dollar company for fixing a game months after launch when it takes one or two days for modders to implement the same fixes?
Stop buying broken games at release and wait a few months. There's no point in spending the biggest amount of money for the worst experience possible.
I get what you're saying, and I agree. But let's not pretend that an externally made mod created using limited tools and visibility of the games internal systems and code is the same thing as an official internal fix or feature addition by the developer. And a modder has zero responsibility for the associated effects of any changes they make, such as to performance or the correct functioning of other systems. They are not the same.
"It's Todd Howard, he wouldn't lie to me!" That made me belly laugh, for real.
Finished starfield and I was underwhelmed. Decided to go back and give fallout 4 a try and starfield makes it look like a masterpiece.
Played Skyrim again before starfield came out hoping to get an immediate upgrade right after I finished and got an immediate downgrade
The fact, that Fallout 4 looked like a masterpiece for @LandynG137, compared to Starfield...
Fallout 4's BoS had like 4 or 5 quests and boom, you were grandmaster. Oh yeah and you had this black haired racist sidekick, forgot his name, the puffed up ignorant dude in his pilot jacket.
@@bignagile4699 im waiting for nolvus v6 skyrim. certainly skyrim will be bethesda studios most beautiful game in 2030 and 2040!
''biggest update yet'' is similar to an random tuesday hotfix for larian, its honestly sad to see actual improvement like landvehicles and more handcrafted POI being gatekept behind paid dlc in all likelyhood.
Starfield is a bigest game.. its more hard kid
@@marcosdgonzalez5270 durpa durpa
Meh, they're rolling out updates at the very least. I don't think anybody expected bethesda to be as on point as larian
I never cared for BG3 I tried and really couldn’t get invested. Plus the top down combat just takes me out of the game
I get the feeling that this game won't be good or considered good until 3 to 5 Years From now, I want it to be 3 years from now, because that's how long it took cyberpunk to actually get good, but because this is Bethesda and they're slow as hell when it comes to updating their game, I say 5 years is more realistic because they take forever to get any fucking thing done, and sometimes they'll focus on the most retarded shit like who gives a fuck about moonshadows and shit, what the fuck? Focus on the shit that actually matters bethesda, you can always work on this stupid moonshadows way down the road you know shit you know prioritize on shit to get done don't fucking work on retarded shit first.
That's where my criticism lies with bethesda, I just don't want them to focus on retarded shit first I want them to prioritize on the things that matter the most and then work on the retarded shit later when it doesn't matter anyway.
Never forget 2 monts for fov slider, and 3 months for dlss,4-5 monts for a goddamn city map....behtesda is a joke
I think basically every dev team has lost its talent. They all still have management but the actual people that made the magic happen are gone.
DLSS requires a secong graphics team, testing, time, resources... just so you can see your benchmark improve. 30 to 60 fps is the best the human eye can see. Monitors and TVs std refresh rate is 60Hz, or 60 frames a second. Above that, your brain cannot see one stream... Hence Starfield looks broken on your amazing system because of your eyes. I suggest DLSS off, and 60fps max.
@@aforbes2nd what are you smoking bro haha
I just said it took 3 months and companies can do better then that
@@ryanvandoren1519And they keep saying the execs are to blame lmao. They're just salvaging whatever bs these devs are pumping out nowadays. I doubt they want to give us shitty games on purposes
@@TheUltimateHacker007 the fact is Microsoft is at blame for quality control, and Bethesda is to blame for putting out shit
Bethesda is NOT CDPR
I don't know why he always compares them Bethesda is pretty much a dishonest company at best.
That's good, hopefully Bethesda won't release a broken game missing most of the RPG elements, and abandon it in under 3 years like CDPR.
@@iyziejane i hope this is sarcasm. I agree Cryberpunk is lacking. But so is Starfield.
True....they are better
@@iyziejane What an absolutely horrible take.
At least with Cyberpunk 2077 the core content was there from the start and good. (They made almost 0 story changes and the builds even became worse in 2.0 in my opinion. Skill trees have almost no synergies with each other now.) Cyberpunk 2077 had so many inexcusable bugs at launch but Starfield is missing an entire game. It’s hard to have bugs when there isn’t a game to begin with. And what is the horrible take on Cyberpunk missing RPG elements while you’re defending Bethesda’s games? If you were to compare Cyberpunk with CRPGs, sure, but Starfield? Every bit of “rpg-element” in Starfield are head-canons you have to make yourself because the only help the game gives in furthering your roleplaying is you picking an option in character customisation that says “You are a professor”, which next to never gets brought up again. I can count on my one hand how many times Bounty Hunter came up in dialogues in my 200h gameplay. The only real flavour that came from the choices in character customisation was the annoying fan and having parents. Cyberpunk’s Nomad/Corpo/Street kid background is super plain and limited but they had more impact on the dialogue than Starfield’s backgrounds. And in classic Bethesda fashion you have zero commitment to anything you would think would have one. Swear yourself to the Rangers? Can do their quest and do every other faction quest too without any repercussions or impact on anything. What was IN the game that you could roleplay that you couldn’t do with other franchises? If I played Prince of Persia I can have the exact same amount of roleplaying by making up a head-canon that Dastan used to have a part-time job at a hotdog stand.
“They abandoned it” Starfield was abandoned before launch.
cyber punk after 1 year when the 1.5 update came out it was amazing. a lot of the improvements that people noticed in the dlc was already in the game from 1.5
But the difference is the base game was good, the main issue was the bugs, fair a bunch good stuff came on updates but something like police chases doesn't really enhance the experience, especially when there's literally no benefit to triggering them, starfield the base game is kinda eh
I don't know how people played that game without the movement abilities they added. Would have been a completely different game for me and not in a good way.
The game was fun for a bit but the second you get through the few interesting quests it's SO BORING. I know Bethesda won't do enough to fix this game. (Cause they'd have to rebuild it)
I find the narrative about Cp2077 really confusing. It didn't take years for it to become good. On pc I had a decent experience the month it launched. Far from perfect but the core was there. And the majority of bug fixes came in the first 7 months. They kept making improvements and adding additional features like advanced ray tracing, but most of the game, and story that exists today was working well within 6-7 months, and for many on pc with decent hardware, the game wasn't completely broken even at launch. Consoles were obviously in a shameful state for a while. The core game has always been good though. This idea that it only became good with the latest updates, additions and system overhauls is dumb. Yes 2.0 and subsequent patches were a big improvement in many ways, but it was pretty exceptional long before that.
And yet people said how shitty it is. Just like this and no man's sky. I played and beat cyberpunk and starfield on release I don't sweat what other people are saying.
A lot of people like me bought CP77 at launch and were disappointed by the lack of open world RPG elements. The gigs are minimal side content, and the emptiness of the city reminded me of the GTA games on the PS2. The main quest feels padded after the first 8 hours and I struggled to like any of the characters. So a lot of the backlash was not about bugs, but lies in the marketing, and CDPR never redeemed themselves in the eyes of those millions of those fans. The brief "redemption arc" came from younger fans of the TV show that listen to UA-cam influencers and were hungry for a GTA type game.
I find that odd too but I can also see where they are coming from. I bought it on pc, had very little issues but I saw all the videos of the bugs. And was like damn, I guess I was just pretty lucky. Besides rushing release I think their biggest mistake was launching it on previous gen, from the bug gameplay I saw a lot of it came from last gen. I felt like I was one of the few people that enjoyed the game at launch, but then again it's all about expectations, besides the teaser I stayed away from all promotional and marketing materials. I was just expecting an rpg lite fps with a decent story in a cyberpunk dystopian world, and that's sort of what I got. However I wasn't a fan boy of the game, I found if there could be improvements to the game due to the valid criticism from the community it would be welcomed. And it worked the game got far better than I would have ever expected. This is also one of the reason why I don't understand the fan boying over starfield, even if you love the game as it is now, if BGS takes the constructive criticism all it would do is improve the game you love so much. It's a win win win.
I totally understand what you're saying now. You're talking about the external monologue from players and game journalists. I just had to read it a second time and then it made sense😂
Like you, I played the game day 1 on PC & had absolutely no issues. In fact, for a studio that had previously only ever made 3rd person fantasy ARPG's, I felt the game was quite groundbreaking.....even if it didn't live up to the hype. It was clear, though, how trying to get the game to work on last gen hardware hurt the game for everyone at release.
Biggest difference between this and CP2077, is the core of that game was always great. Starfield has issues with its core mechanics, the amount of work required would surmount to a new game
Too busy playing bg3, i cant get over how much stuff i keep finding too do. Such a masterpiece fr.
Such a remake... Nothing new again. D&D has a little more content to draw from, why do we get recycled crap?
Cool are you a table top style game fan? I wanna try it but am unsure if that play style will appeal to me?
@@aforbes2ndspoken like someone who has clearly not played BG3. Go troll elsewhere.
@@TEEANVEE I hate turn based games but I have finished the game 3 times so far. I was a bit bored when I first started, but the story ended up hooking me. It's very dialogue heavy, but the choices you make during a lot of those moments have actual impact, sometimes big sometimes small. Plus for a turn based game, the combat feels intense at times, looks great, and sounds fantastic.
Watch some reviews and stuff to see if it could be up your alley, then give it a try :)
@@TEEANVEE ive never played dnd in my life, i love high fantasy. And bg3 does it amazingly. It gives me lotr vibes. But alot darker. Its very good if you like to just dissapear into a really in depth fantasy world.
People shouldn't have to wait for 3 years for a game to become good. It should be good out of the door
Especially with 450 people working on it for over 8 years.
I really wished they would have made 1 solar system 4-5 planets
And dlc would have been like an experimental wormhole machine that took you to another smaller one or something similar
Indeed. Starfield set in the solar system would have been better. Plenty of asteroids and planetoids in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud to host countless procgen spaces.
@@ElijsDimaYep, the TV show Expanse is set in just our solar system and of course there's plenty of great storytelling.
I think Matty needs to start disclosing that he works for Bethesda cuz he's doing so much PR for their bullshit.
No seriously he reaches huge he said starfield would age like new Vegas I was dying 🤣 😂 😭. Absolutely not.
I do like his content but they got to just admit this game was a flop to what it should have been.
Well he did say out of Elder Scrolls, Fallout and Starfield, he likes Starfield the least. His review was even more harsh than Gamespot where every fan lost their shlt over. If you think he's doing great PR for Bethesda than you clearly haven't seen his review of the game.
@@eugeneaubry4308new Vegas was considered a terrible game on release. Nostalgia is one hell of a drug
It’s so cringe to watch ngl
@@shifterzxI definitely agree with you. He is a good reviewer and he shunned starfield where it lacked according to him. Also even if he likes the game he has the right to have an opinion.
Installed starfield, beat the game, did many side quests, finally realized id rather play everspace 2 lol. Uninstalled starfield after like 2 weeks. Im surprised luke is giving it a 7 out of 10. More like a 4
Here's the thing. "Game development takes time" only goes so far. They took EIGHT YEARS to make this game and the questlines are still broken months later. People don't owe Bethesda patience on this.
It's so frustrating that instead of focusing entirely on things that will improve the game greatly as far as gameplay, they waste so much time and energy on FUCKING SHADOWS as if anyone gives a damn in the big picture 🧐
The difference between the 30 and the 130 hour mark is negligable at best. The people saying you just have to play another X amount of hours to not be disappointed are nuts.
I'm actually excited to see what they do to Starfield, Mainly because I just don't think this "redemption arc" has a very high ceiling of potential.
There's only so much you can do with the basic framework, and this framework is a rust bucket lol
You can't fix bad writing and lame fetch quests. Honestly I think they're toast as a studio.
For me, the best redemption is a redemption to the utterly and terribly boring dialog. That's the real game breaker for me. I know that people hate the plethora of loading screens. I know that players hate the fact that they cannot really commandeer their ships. And, the major complaints about the baron worlds cannot be denied. But for me, the dialog writing is so dry and painfully boring. How can Bethesda redeem that?
They can’t and they won’t
Yep the writing is my biggest gripe, lack of good companions second. A few hours in and I honestly began to get angry at just how poor the storytelling is.
Its so hilarious that BGS calls a mere 100 fixes, additions and improvements their "Biggest Update"-after almost 5 months post launch-when you consider that Larian released 2 Patches, with over a couple of thousand fixes, imrpovements and additions, within the first month of release.
Bug fixes: cool.. but I didn't see a fix for my ship dumping HUNDREDS of useless items into my cargo after every minor ship change, so I don't really care about the rest.
Personally I am in the camp of "Why aren't you focused on making the game fun?" and honestly probably won't care about any Starfield changes until I see the words "revamp" or "overhaul".
What I hate is when they'll add shit to the update that doesn't matter, like who gives a fuck about moonshadows? Why was that and needed update? It wasn't, but they did it anyway, I think when it comes to updating their game they should prioritize on the most important things before they ever do an update.
That retarded shit can always come later, but the more important things need to be done more importantly right away God dammit!.
Another big problem with the Starfield UI that really needs to be fixed is that there are multiple categories of quests, and these are spread across multiple star systems and locations, but there's no way to filter your quests by the location you are in. For example if you are in Neon, there's no way for you to display only quests that have waypoints in neon. Even when You are doing a quest, and you look at the latest quest marker, trying to find that quest again in the quest list is unnecessarily cumbersome.
This drove me nuts and is such a BASIC option. Just one of a thousand baffling decisions.
The reason why people praise cyberpunk and no mans sky for turning the game around is because those stories are outliers. The question should be if bethesda will sink in the time and money to try to update this game to where players are coming back. Or will they jump ship and focus on elder scrolls six? Because it doesn't seem like they can just rely on mods like previous games.
hopefully they focus on ES6 because Starfield is a dumpster fire that smoke will ascend from forever
"Biggest update yet" when the previous updates have been small hotfixes at best, doesn't tell much...
played starfield for 9 hours the day it launched early, turned it off, uninstalled and wrote the $100 off as a loss, been playing skyrim ever since waiting on the fallout 4 update.
“We can do anything, we just can’t do everything… but we chose to do nothing.”
Yeah they didn’t do either of them
I played it for 40hrs then played cyberpunk and never touched starfield again.😂
do you work 😏
Interesting that in the early concept of the Starmap the Lodge is on a different planet! I think that makes much more sense, given Constellation are meant to be a neutral faction & also most people don’t know they still exist - yet they are based in the capital of the UC.. 😂 shame they changed it
Kinda funny how Respawn has been on vacation for almost a year now, hope they get back soon to fixing Jedi Survivor!
The community needs to understand, you can't build sweeping changes on top of a broken game. You need to baseline the current game with these fixes and minor improvements and then you can build new content on top of systems which are actually working as intended. I'm happy for this patch to be released and I'm looking forward to the longer term improvements.
You can add a lot of fixes and polish, but a rotten core is a rotten core no matter how shiny the waxjob on top.
Playing Starfield feels like sitting in the library studying, its base gameplay loop is tediously depressing, its gonna take more than a few fixes and QoL changes to inject any personality into this undercooked turkey, its just dull
Hey the library can be pretty nice star field is like watching plain white paint dry
@inuclearpickle8628 Yeah thats fair lol
If we keep trying to redeem half baked games then we are becoming the industry problem. As gamers and consumers we have to clearly say no. Corpos can't keep getting rewarded for bad behavior, bad design and disrespecting customers and gamers.
At the end of the day the problem isn’t the devs it’s the massive drove of stupid players that buy games from developers day one after seeing all the trends of rushed and unfinished games and then never voting with there wallet that’s why I’ve never gotten into first person shooters, it’s just repetitive, boring and the most common game that has flaws and bugs
Yes! Thank you.
For me the worst part of starfield was the loot. The missions were alright but all of the loot was literally the same 5 weapons and not even better versions one just has a scope and the other doesn't.
I couldn't even care to finish the campaign because of how boring it felt. I just stopped playing and accepted that this game isn't for me 😂
I think it would go a long way if they can cut out the load screens for traveling to different places and have random encounters like if you were going to a different planet and you warp into a battle field were you have navigate through destroyed ships with space mines and somewhere maybe there’s legendary loot
Also it would be cool if you could own a freighter ship and have that as a mobile base where you could also have all your ships docked in
I they get rid of the need for fast travel I will give the game a shot
@@takemeseriouslyplx2124 😂 I guess you’ll never play the game. It’s a dumpster fire that will take at least 4 years to put out
Starfield will never work like that, maybe Starfield 2 if that's ever a thing @@O.C.P_officer77
I don’t think they have the tech to straight up cut the load screens, but they should really figure out how to better mask them. Like, in Elite, jumps between star systems are actually a sort of load screen, but the transition between it and gameplay is seamless. If we could at least have seamless transition between player control and jump animations that would go a long way to make it feel less disruptive.
At this point I think everything that's being said about this game should have a huge sarcastic filter over any huge mega big new update to save the world newssss Stanfield!!! Like this new update will "totally" "fix" the big "issues" with this "amazing" "game"""""""game"""" in all honesty, Bethesda has turned a single player experience into live service game. People paid for a beta and now they are slowly updating it.
It's more like an early access title, and the consumers end up being the game testers because Bethesda are too cheap to have game testers, honestly it sounds a little bit too much like Windows as an operating system these days, they release a buggy version of Windows and people all around the world who are using their program tell them how terrible it runs so then they do some more updates and it runs worse and then they do some more updates and then it runs worse and eventually people get sick and tired of Microsoft and their shit, and then they moved to Lenox and Linux isn't perfect either but at least the community there actually fucking tries to make things better and they don't spy on you.
Going back to the topic of bethesda, they seem to run into the same cycle every time they release any game, they release it in a buggy broken mess, and they don't fix it for a while, this time however it seems a little bit different, but only because people are negative about the games reception and it's showing up and platform, and Bethesda can't just give up on their baby they created for the last decade straight, they have to go back to the drawing board and fix all the shit they fucked up, part of me feels like it's a scam, because normally when it's an early access game they don't ask for that much money, they ask for maybe $30 for an early access game some of them are 25 or $20 or maybe even 15, my point is they sold this game as if it was a full game but it's clearly An Early Access title, it's not finished and it's not going to be finished anytime soon, in my understanding it's false advertising to call it a full complete game and sell it as a full price title, they should give people back their money or they could give them half their money back, because this game right now in a state is not worth what they say it's worth in any shape or form, because it's an early access title game that is not finished and won't likely be finished roughly 3 to 5 years from now, I say 3 years because that's how long it took cyberpunk to fix their game to actually make it good, but because this is Bethesda and I know they take a fuck love longer to update their game, I say 5 years is more realistic.
Hey I was talking about it, I asked everyone about traversal, some modders even had The Mako from ME1 planned......nobody could answer.
Mako was scrapped about a week after Starfield launched as they realised there was no point.
Pretty telling that Starfield player count has already dropped below Skyrim SE (and even Fallout 4) on steam charts. I think the escapism piece that Luke mentions near the end plays a big role in that.
Im sure bethesda will keep updating and adding features for free like no mans sky did 😅
5:00
Why do you defend them?
"Game dev takes time"
Yes, yes it does.
But i think few months for fov slider and eating button is a bit too much time. Especially when they claim at the same time that at the moment 250 people is working on the game
you know what gonna be good for the expansion? is that Bethesda might have more time on writing characters and the story.
Yeah, it was a quest. I couldn’t complete because every time the Crimson Raiders load and it glitches and freezes my ship in place. Starfeild has a lot of potential I think it’s its own thing I think with time and updates it can be solid Need some memorable characters and Factions a sense of “Purpose” to Explore
It was the crimson fleet not the raiders😅. Raiders are from borderlands 😊
Honestly I hope starfield finds a way to make a comeback but sadly idk if I'll ever beat it I don't even bother upping the difficulty, after for the 5th time trying to at least prog the main quest since bgs usually forces ya to do it, I still get so bored that I just delete it. Skyrim slowly has started doing this to me but I'd still rather play that then starfield cause yeah starfield is just way to bare and combat is not fun to me.
For anyone who can make it through that game however, you are built differently and a trooper lol
hey Luke, you should do a deep dive on all the drama happening with Cities Skylines 2. I know you were interested in the game and so were we, but when it released, it was a classic case of unfinished, broken, buggy mess, which they sold at full price despite the game being nigh-unplayable. They raised the min. and recommended specs right before release and the game still came out unplayable for most people (even top-of-the-line rigs). They've released some patches to fix it but it's nowhere near where it should be. The other day, the CEO of Colossal Order talked about "toxicity" in the fanbase but if you read the comments, everyone's like "you sold us a broken game at full price, you're not the one who should be mad here"
Gaslighting is an epidemic in today's world. Whether the topic is politics or the game industry. Or in simple petty, personal conflicts with another person in your life. Gaslighting is the hottest trend right now. It's what all the cool kids are doing.
The game has a green filter on everything, i really dont know why
I wish they would:
-fire Emil-whatever his name is
-abandon Starfield
-listen to all the feedback they have had
-work on an actual fun game with legit exploration and character building
100 fixes after this length of time is pathetic.
Do people not know Bethesda history? There will be no NMS redemption.
The Engine is holding the game back, I feel. It looks like Fallout 4 in space.
MrMattyPlays, the ultimate bethesda shills
Until I'm able to land and take off manually, then starfield can stay uninstalled. I don't think that'll ever happen though so...
Most of the issues to me feel like last-minute changes that make little sense. Why remove the survival mechanics entirely? Surely it wouldn't have been too difficult to make it into a separate game mode right away? Some consistency issues also feel like a really weird oversight. Either the lack of a design doc or some changes made way too late.
Bethesda hasn't made a "new" RPG since Fallout 3. Starting with Oblivion, their RPG's are like 2K releases but come out every 4-6 years instead of yearly, but that's just like, my opinion, man
I still won't go back till I see what they do with the DLC & how they plan to fix the game from there on.
It's never going to be great. The fundamental architecture of it will always hold it back. The load screens and menu hoping are built into the core.
It may improve. But it'll never be what everyone dreamed it was going to be.
"See that moon, it's really there, you can go there." No one assumed that meant through a bunch of menu selections and load screens.
I love how the patch 4 months after release fixes stuff moders already fixed ages ago.
Let me explain Starfield in the mix of so many good games previous year and where it lacked....it is just bland across the board from its gameplay to story to quests to open world and after roaming 2-3 planet fish bowls you will get the whole idea of so called exploration in Starfield as by far biggest problem is this (it's core design)... it's a single player title that wants to spend hours on it roaming planets without a sense of progression that I would get from a MMO or online live service.....I mean after completing the story and side quests what's the point of playing it if it is "boring and bland".....and then you will realise more how bad the creation engine really is (on it's last legs) and the technical aspects of the game which is actually way outdated....so no fun and more bugs and limitations and restrictions and the kore you play video games it is supposed to get better with time (slow burns like New AC games or previous Bethesda titles) and somehow it progressively gets worse as the game goes on....like there is no sense of achievement no pleasure in putting more hours into the game and also matter of fact is unlike old Bethesda titles which were backed up by amazing community of mods....there are no such mods for this till now that will add things that will be fun again.....and lastly Starfield decided to release in that year where the steaks of games was really high and the quality we expected would be much more than Beth's delivered
.....it is the same thing that Ubisoft didn't understand for the longest time that amount of content and quality of content much different than each other...Starfield has a lot of mechanics and it also tries to become the jack of all trades like AC Valaha but suffers as it can't clearly implement anything really ❤(hope Luke reads this comment)
LUKE COULD YOU TALK ABOUT PALWORLD? THE “POKÉMON WITH GUNS” GAME? IT LOOKS VERY PROMISING IMO AND ID LIKE TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK
TELL ME YOURE 12 YEARS OLD WITHOUT TELLING ME YOURE 12 YEARS OLD
why are you guys yelling?
@@SobeCrunkMonster why be mean about this
SEX GIFS
@@SobeCrunkMonsteryeah man, with so much hatred in this world why be mean? I hope you grow to see how much a kind action can make an impact
The engine is by far my biggest problem with starfield and that can't be fixed with an update. I can still see Morrowind behind the scenes when playing and it feels terrible in 2024. I remember playing skyrim and dreaming of a day when I didn't have to wait for a loading screen everywhere. Well it looks like that day will never come with these clowns.
Cutting out features is not always a good idea, i say put them in and then give the player options. to play with or not to play with. That increases re-play ability
Starfield being redeemed will be very hard.
Matty and cog have been giving star field to much praise I wish cog was more critical especially, because I can understand matty fan boying more but I was hoping to hear cog’s criticisms more
Edit: more about how bland and boring/watered down it feels pg13 movie esc bs little reality/grit
Edit:you should make it a video if you talk to someone about it it would be interesting
oh yeah, skyrim UI so amazing that one of the most popular mods is to change it completely
Starfield is so boring that I uninstalled the game. I regret my preorder purchase. :(
I went back to playing CyberPunk 2077 and
I’m looking forward to Dragon’s Dogma 2 though.
Time for me to re-benchmark this after I just did my video for benchmarking Starfields performance 3 months later vs day 1 .I don’t wanna do another 80 hours of testing lmfao 🤣
Always with the "just wait" till it gets good.
The whole plot armor thing, drives me up a wall!!!
Stop apologizing for Bethesda! The more people do this, the more they will believe it is OK to release half-baked games.
Starfields issue is space in real life is boring. In No Man's Sky, planets are super close to each other it's ridiculous. You can zip around the entire star system in minutes which if you could do in real life, would be faster than light speed. But it at least feels like you are moving really fast. In Starfield, the speed is more 'realistic' and as such the planet in the background doesn't really change in apparant size so it looks like you aren't actually moving. Just like in real life if you were out there. And that's boring. But that's the direction they deliberately chose. It's not a flaw, it's just they went for 'too much' realism if they expected people to have fun in these areas
But men went to the moon, nothing was there, and definitely they weren't bored 😂
@@sadarumhogai9337haha indeed. A comment for the ages to be sure.
it's flawed game design
3:57 in the demo they said the theme is like futuristic and advance but like used to feel more grounded like that so they just put a filter on it 😂
I would wait for Game of the Year edition. But then I would be waiting forever. This game will never get GOTY.
Tbh, I didn't look up anything about starfield before it came out. Maybe a trailer or two, but I purposely didn't look into it because I didn't want to be swayed by opinions. I enjoyed it for like a week or two then got bored. I hope they fix it eventually.
I'm playing Skyrim again with a 2024 mod list, never been easier to play modded Skyrim
Todd Howard: "We can do anything; we just can't do everything."
Somebody please tell Chris Roberts...
how many years was this game in development? and now they expect me to clap my hands when they do some bug fixes and minor changes? I don't think so.
I wish bethesda wasnt deluded about how 'successful' and 'great' starfield is. If they were more honest about it and can take the criticism to heart I would have more hope for Elder Scrolls 6.
idk if he means it or not but Luke’s content always has these nuggets of greater meaning here and there.
or am I just crazy
The fact that the game needs so many load screens for showing nothing tell us all we need to know about the engine.
In No Man's Sky you start on foot, get on the ship, fly to space, land on your frigate and no load screen.
Only Bethesda and Todd Howard can spend 23 years + making a game. That comes out usually extensively buggy, slightly broken, and generally to mixed reviews. Then spend 1-10 years improving it just to make a playable game. After all this they'll launch a Special Edition, or Anniversary Edition.
I haven't been able to play the game from the geko post 4 days of playtime, after 4 days it immediately crashed.
Been many months since and the gane still doesn't work.
That green blurry color filter looks terrible. A modder made Neutral Luts No Color Filter the game looks so much better.
Starfield even *attempting* a "redemption arc" would be like Fortnite launching in 2017 and then choosing to dump all their resources into supporting the Save the World mode.
It shouldn’t be accepted for a game company to follow a schedule like that. Games should be released with a minimum amount of bugs. Not buying a developers games will force them to release great games. Either release them complete or go out of business.
I'm tired of people acting like this is okay. Games should not be able to have years of development just to have more years of development after people already paid for it. They're supposed to get funding before making a good game, not make a bad game and get the funding to make it better over time.
It takes them months and months to get these out is because the workers don’t like to work. Meanwhile they go on their 2 hour lunch break and screams at a McDonald’s employee for there coffee machine being broke and they misgendered them when they apologized for the inconvenience 😂
I just got bored at around 15 hours. It baffles me at how many "quest" are... get quest on Mars, fly to moon, walk to base, talk to guy, get item, fly back to Mars, hand in item. And all that was 2 mins of walking/talking and 6 loading screens.
Polishing a turd doesnt make it taste better to me
Wow the game went from a 3/10 to a… 3.2/10. Nice job Bethesda
It makes me giggle when I think of the big bg3 patch vs the “big” Starfield patch
This is another game that I will buy in a couple of years, maybe, if gets good.
Starfield is just another game that Bethesda was expecting modders to fix. Unfortunately, for Bethesda, most modders don't want to touch it. Tells me all I need to know. I'll go back to Oblivion for now.