KMS Deutschland/Lutzow - Guide 212

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • The Deutschland/Lutzoiw, a Deutschland class cruiser of the Kriegsmarine, is today's subject.
    Read more about the ship here:
    www.amazon.co.uk/German-Warships-1815-1945-One-Surface/dp/B001W0OEJ0
    www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00SGC4VN6/
    Naval photos and more - www.drachinifel.co.uk
    Model ships of many periods - store.warlordga...?aff=21
    Want to support the channel? - / drachinifel
    Want a shirt/mug/hoodie - shop.spreadshi...
    Want a poster? - www.etsy.com/u...
    Want to talk about ships? / discord
    Want to get some books? www.amazon.co.uk/shop/drachinifel
    Next on the list:
    -Eidsvold class
    -SMS Emden (II)
    -Tashkent-1934A Class
    -River class / HMS Plym (K271)
    -Siegfried class
    -HMS Caroline
    -Ships of Battle of Campeche

КОМЕНТАРІ • 645

  • @Drachinifel
    @Drachinifel  3 роки тому +49

    Pinned post for Q&A :)

    • @Billy_Annizarry
      @Billy_Annizarry 3 роки тому +1

      Is the sinking of HMS Glorious avoidable had she not detached from the convoy after evacuating Narvik?

    • @Ex-LDS
      @Ex-LDS 3 роки тому +1

      Great video!
      Love to see a video of the ww2 dkm lightcruiser class Königsberg.

    • @unitedlunch1609
      @unitedlunch1609 3 роки тому +3

      On the German aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin what was the plan for pilots were they going to come from the luftwaffe or kriegsmarine?

    • @agesflow6815
      @agesflow6815 3 роки тому +3

      What duties were the crew of a damaged ship assigned to whist in port for repairs or upgrades? For repairs or upgrades lasting several months or more, would they be retained for crewing the ship once it was repaired or reassigned entirely?

    • @seppokajantie9588
      @seppokajantie9588 3 роки тому +2

      Q&A: To what degree can a wooden keel be repaired?

  • @randomguy-tg7ok
    @randomguy-tg7ok 3 роки тому +526

    RIP to the Rather Brave Bomb Defusal Drone.

  • @salfox1820
    @salfox1820 3 роки тому +366

    Not only did Deutschland try to launch herself, skipping the traditional champagne bottle christening for good luck, but on her way down the slipway she passed under a ladder, broke a mirror, and had a black cat cross her path. Truly star-crossed.

    • @jonathanhill4892
      @jonathanhill4892 3 роки тому +30

      couldn't have done much for the black cat on the slip-way either:)

    • @adamtruong1759
      @adamtruong1759 3 роки тому +20

      Then there's HMS Formidable, she actually launched herself during the ceremony, but as that was unfolding she was given a champagne bottle christening which came in clutch, therefore giving her good luck because, well, she was going to need it. Formidable didn't fall or tilt over whatsoever and was perfectly fine when she came down into the water, so there's that.

    • @disunityholychaos7523
      @disunityholychaos7523 3 роки тому +7

      @@adamtruong1759 wait.. dint formidable also killed a woman after she suddenly launched herself? it was even on the newsreel as the old timey narrator nonchalantly spoke about it.

    • @adamtruong1759
      @adamtruong1759 3 роки тому +9

      @@disunityholychaos7523 I'm pretty sure the lady was just a wife of a dock worker, not the same lady that gave the ship good luck.

    • @jimkrueger9462
      @jimkrueger9462 3 роки тому +3

      @@disunityholychaos7523

  • @Paveway-chan
    @Paveway-chan 3 роки тому +324

    Deutchland: I shall defend my namesake's honour
    German navy: we're changing your name
    Lützow: well now i am not doing it

    • @LiveErrors
      @LiveErrors 3 роки тому +30

      that pretty much is what the sailors superstition says as well, Renaming a ship in the middle of its service will curse it.

    • @phaasch
      @phaasch 3 роки тому +7

      Tyrrhenia/ Lancastria being a supreme example.

    • @Edax_Royeaux
      @Edax_Royeaux 3 роки тому +3

      It doesn't help that they still had Deutschland-class battleships still in the Navy when these Deutschland-class pocket battleships were built. It's a bit confusing.

    • @LiveErrors
      @LiveErrors 3 роки тому +5

      @@Edax_Royeaux sure when you say it like that, but then remember that Pocket-Battleship was a term coined by the British Media

    • @Edax_Royeaux
      @Edax_Royeaux 3 роки тому +2

      ​@@LiveErrors It's still awkward to have multiple different Deutschland class ships sailing in a Navy at the same time. Why not a Deutschland class Submarine and Deutschland class Destroyer while we're at this lack of imagination?

  • @Big_E_Soul_Fragment
    @Big_E_Soul_Fragment 3 роки тому +256

    Deutschland/Lutzow: heads out
    Bad luck: *Hello there*

    • @marcusfranconium3392
      @marcusfranconium3392 3 роки тому +11

      sounds like the zevenprovincien, a name change to soerabaja . got bombed 3 times ,and sunk twice.

    • @zhoufang996
      @zhoufang996 3 роки тому +8

      Hey, at least the crew mostly survived

    • @joshthomas-moore2656
      @joshthomas-moore2656 3 роки тому +2

      I wasn't aware Bad luck was an Obi Wan fan

    • @marcusfranconium3392
      @marcusfranconium3392 3 роки тому +3

      @@joshthomas-moore2656 If you have a 50% chance of chosing the right option , your chance of chosing the wrong option is 100%

    • @joshthomas-moore2656
      @joshthomas-moore2656 3 роки тому

      @@marcusfranconium3392 You lost me

  • @AndyM_323YYY
    @AndyM_323YYY 3 роки тому +198

    I cannot imagine what a bomb disposal officer feels when he's told they have found an unexploded Tallboy.

    • @jonsouth1545
      @jonsouth1545 3 роки тому +50

      Well I'm sure he was happy that he was already wearing his brown pants that day

    • @Kevin-mx1vi
      @Kevin-mx1vi 3 роки тому +23

      Change of underwear ? Suddenly remembers an appointment elsewhere ? Abrupt case of "man flu" ?

    • @davidelliott5843
      @davidelliott5843 3 роки тому +16

      It hardly matters. A little 50 pounder will kill him just as dead.

    • @grumpyboomer61
      @grumpyboomer61 3 роки тому +18

      Something that size? You'd never know what hit you. Something small, on the other hand? "This could hurt".

    • @AndyM_323YYY
      @AndyM_323YYY 3 роки тому +22

      @@grumpyboomer61 Yeah, but an earth wall and a few sandbags, and unless you are within the containment area that something small is just an unwelcome neighbour. A Tallboy and you want to be one city block over.

  • @notshapedforsportivetricks2912
    @notshapedforsportivetricks2912 3 роки тому +148

    So THAT'S what a Tallboy looks like when it goes iff underwater.
    Definitely worth the wait.

    • @verysilentmouse
      @verysilentmouse 3 роки тому +16

      That was rather small compared to the physics involved dropping it from 30000ft then exploding.

    • @SZKARLUPIEN
      @SZKARLUPIEN 3 роки тому +18

      here's the video
      ua-cam.com/video/-iSRkvAupT8/v-deo.html&feature=emb_title

    • @Dave_Sisson
      @Dave_Sisson 3 роки тому +9

      @@SZKARLUPIEN Thanks for that link, the last view of the explosion shows just how devastating the Tall Boy was, 75 years after it was dropped.

    • @verysilentmouse
      @verysilentmouse 3 роки тому +6

      And now having seen the explosion ok not so small in its own right, and I can't even comprehend being anywhere one exploding after falling from 30000ft

    • @alanhughes6753
      @alanhughes6753 3 роки тому +11

      No, that is a Tallboy exploding after the explosive payload has sat there degrading for nearly 70 years. The bang from a brand new one was significantly larger. And of course, Tallboy was simply a scaled-down prototype for its big brother: Grand Slam!

  • @1977Yakko
    @1977Yakko 3 роки тому +46

    Just goes to show what a friend lot the Brits are. That torpedo that nearly blew off her stern wasn't an act of malice, they were just trying to fix a design flaw in explosive fashion.

  • @thehandoftheking3314
    @thehandoftheking3314 3 роки тому +94

    It would be interesting to see statistics on renamed ships vs bad luck.

    • @BobSmith-dk8nw
      @BobSmith-dk8nw 3 роки тому +11

      Another would be the _St. Lo_
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_St._Lo
      The _St. Lo_ was one of two _Casablanca Class_ Escort Carriers to be renamed because of the new, larger carriers coming out after the Essex class - these ships giving up their names for the larger vessels.
      Here's a list of the ships of this class - showing the names of those that were changed.
      These two ships were originally going to be named _Midway_ and _Coral Sea_ but - when the Navy preferred to have more substantial ships named after these two battles - these ships were re-named the _St. Lo_ and the _Anzio_
      Curiously - the new _Midway Class_ carriers (the largest in the world for some time) also had a ship re-named. The second ship of the class, which was going to be named _Coral Sea_ was re-named the _Franklin Delano Roosevelt_ because of that Presidents death - with the name _Coral Sea_ going to the third ship of the class. So - there were TWO aircraft carriers which _were_ going to be named _Coral Sea_ which ended up being named something else.
      None of the other ships were lost besides the _St. Lo_ but ... the _FDR_ had a somewhat troubled life and was scrapped 13 years before the actual _Coral Sea_ with the _Midway_ becoming a memorial ship in San Diego Bay.
      Of coarse ... the _St. Lo_ had also previously been named the _Chapin Bay_ so ... maybe it's really unlucky to have a ship re-named twice ...
      Just found out as I was researching this that the _Anguilla Bay_ had been renamed the _Salamaua_ ... was damaged - but repaired.
      .

    • @jerrymccrae7202
      @jerrymccrae7202 3 роки тому +1

      It really depends HOW AND IF your a believer in " bad luck".

    • @thehandoftheking3314
      @thehandoftheking3314 3 роки тому

      @@jerrymccrae7202 I believe in that. And is good luck.

    • @BobSmith-dk8nw
      @BobSmith-dk8nw 3 роки тому

      @@jerrymccrae7202 It would seem that ... the greater impact random chance had on one's life - the more superstitious one might be ...
      .

    • @jerrymccrae7202
      @jerrymccrae7202 3 роки тому

      @@BobSmith-dk8nw hi thx 4 your reply..also just thought if you think it bad you will make it so.

  • @zhoufang996
    @zhoufang996 3 роки тому +159

    It must suck to have your ship renamed to emphasise that it's fairly expendable.

    • @arthurfisher1857
      @arthurfisher1857 3 роки тому +21

      Seriously... "Stop worrying. It's just a precaution! When... *cough*, I'm sorry, I mean IF you get sunk, we don't want you to soil the good name of Germany."

    • @mxaxai9266
      @mxaxai9266 3 роки тому +6

      And then it survives nearly the entire war while the other, fancier, ships have long been sent to the bottom of the ocean.

  • @csabaszep8162
    @csabaszep8162 3 роки тому +199

    I see this ship would have had a really nice career in slapstick movies.

    • @WayneBorean
      @WayneBorean 3 роки тому +8

      Would have been a heck of a lot easier on the poor crew!

    • @swanner95
      @swanner95 3 роки тому +7

      If she was to star in a film they could have used her in the film about the Graf Spee in 1955, replete with Captain Langsdorf, Captain Dove and 11 inch flipping guns

    • @nonowgoaway
      @nonowgoaway 3 роки тому +3

      Put it in a comedy troupe along with William D. Porter and Aoba. Hijinks guaranteed.

    • @peterkroger7112
      @peterkroger7112 3 роки тому +3

      Not as much as the Kamchatka...

  • @dourmoose
    @dourmoose 3 роки тому +63

    Anybody else hear horses whinnying every time he says “Blücher”?

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 3 роки тому +10

      "What knockers"

    • @MarcStjames-rq1dm
      @MarcStjames-rq1dm 3 роки тому +8

      Every time and in every video Drach does... when he says 'Blucher".

    • @stopspammandm
      @stopspammandm 3 роки тому +3

      You beat me too it!

    • @stopspammandm
      @stopspammandm 3 роки тому +3

      ua-cam.com/video/bps5hJ5DQDw/v-deo.html

    • @dourmoose
      @dourmoose 3 роки тому +4

      @@stopspammandm 🤣😎

  • @CykoruKun
    @CykoruKun 3 роки тому +10

    My father in law lives in city of Swinoujscie (Swinemunde before war) where Lutzow was sank and he written a book about her sinking. We even traced a relative of one of the bomber crew (the Lancaster that was shot down during the raid) to see if he had any stories about the raid (he was very glad he could tell us stories about his father). Father in law also restored a monument that was placed there for the crew of Lancaster.
    Also placement of unexploded Tallboy was very unfortunate - these piers/jetties/whatever they are called on the right side of the picture are actually docking ports for a ferry that goes around to other side every 30 minutes. Each ferry takes 300 people/70 cars. Just imagine if the bomb exploded on it's own.

  • @woytaq
    @woytaq 3 роки тому +31

    I must say I'm impressed how you avoided naming the port Lützow was bombed in. A bit of a shame though, as listening to you trying to pronounce Świnoujście (or Swinemünde for that matter) would be be very interesting in a sadistic kind of way.

    • @kirgan1000
      @kirgan1000 3 роки тому +4

      Or he can say Pig-inlet : )

    • @kemarisite
      @kemarisite 3 роки тому +8

      He has enough fun saying Schleswig-Holstein.

  • @Trek001
    @Trek001 3 роки тому +72

    Last time I was this early, Kamchatka was still seeing torpedo boats

  • @AROBASPARK
    @AROBASPARK 3 роки тому +25

    The fact the ship was launch prematurely, while a politician is talking, is indeed funny.

    • @wolfbyte3171
      @wolfbyte3171 3 роки тому +11

      "Ugh, screw this blowhard, I wanna get going already!" - Deutschland, her launching ceremony.

  • @catriona_drummond
    @catriona_drummond 3 роки тому +54

    The ship may have been unlucky but I guess the crew was luckier than those of most other ships that gloriously sank with 80% of their men.

  • @pscwplb
    @pscwplb 3 роки тому +22

    There's footage of the bombing mission to take out Lutzow that shows one bomb splashing down in the water and not exploding. It's almost certainly the exact same bomb that blew up in the river.

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 3 роки тому +4

      It was simply biding it's time

    • @slavkovalsky1671
      @slavkovalsky1671 3 роки тому +4

      @@mpetersen6 Just a very long fuse, ticking away. Somebody got seconds and years mixed up. /i

    • @davidbrennan660
      @davidbrennan660 3 роки тому +4

      Playing the long game, one day another Lützow will be docking there in the far future.

  • @tcofield1967
    @tcofield1967 3 роки тому +6

    I know she was called an unlucky ship but every time she sortied she returned home. She didn't do much but when she did something, she came back. That is lucky to me.

  • @piritskenyer
    @piritskenyer 3 роки тому +31

    Always fun to see what a Tallboy *actually* looks like exploding.

    • @paintedblue1791
      @paintedblue1791 3 роки тому +3

      From a safe distance!

    • @Ridliman
      @Ridliman 3 роки тому +4

      @@paintedblue1791 From a safe distance indeed. But I suppose that this explosion wasn't a big as a "younger" tallboy could do.

    • @kreol1q1q
      @kreol1q1q 3 роки тому +5

      I think the yield was said to be much smaller due to age and the effects of being submerged for quite a while.

    • @fortusvictus8297
      @fortusvictus8297 3 роки тому +4

      @@kreol1q1q It also wasn't exploding in conjunction with an impact, if I recall correctly the Tall Boy bombs were designed to have as much velocity as possible (pushing Mach 1) when they hit, to the end that the ones that struck the Tirpitz actually detonated UNDER the ship after passing completely thru the deck armor and hull.

    • @grlt23
      @grlt23 3 роки тому +2

      I am sorry to disappoint you but that's not what it looks like... I mean the defusal operation was done by using deflagration - burning the charge without explosion - and it went well for few seconds, burning about 50% (probably, we will never know) of torpex inside. Then the rest of charge exploded, but because the bomb casing was already open - the detonation of the rest was also weaker...
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflagration

  • @Boxghost102
    @Boxghost102 3 роки тому +154

    Last time I was this early Hitler still thought the surface fleet was viable.

    • @mwnciboo
      @mwnciboo 3 роки тому +14

      Any chance of a viable surface fleet disappeared to the bottom of Scarpa flow on 21 June 1919.

    • @leftcoaster67
      @leftcoaster67 3 роки тому +3

      I don't think he ever thought a surface viable.

    • @Nightdare
      @Nightdare 3 роки тому

      @@mwnciboo
      Germany had relatively few ships at the end of WW1 that could have had a purpose in WW2
      Actually, it disappeared on Sep. 3 1939 when the Brits did the thing Hitler was told they wouldn't do
      If they hadn't declared war, Ol' Adolf would have gotten some more time to get his shipyards churning out some more capital ships
      (plan Z - Although Britain would probably never have given the Germans the chance to complete it)

    • @deluca1031
      @deluca1031 3 роки тому

      Nah,they don't have the resources neither the engineer and design director

    • @colbeausabre8842
      @colbeausabre8842 2 роки тому

      @@mwnciboo Given geography, it disappeared with passage of the First Naval Law

  • @snakes3425
    @snakes3425 3 роки тому +27

    Captain (To the Allies): STOP BLOWING HOLES IN MY SHIP
    Allies: Break out the Tall Boys

    • @HalIOfFamer
      @HalIOfFamer 3 роки тому

      Allies (to the germans): you done goofed.

  • @FirstLast_Nba
    @FirstLast_Nba 3 роки тому +25

    Thanks for letting the world know there is interesting history other than Stalingrad.

  • @mannys9130
    @mannys9130 3 роки тому +17

    Wow, I'm really impressed that the Tallboy was still viable after alllllllll this time underwater! 🤯 Makes you wonder about that broken arrow in Georgia. 😱

    • @jmrico1979
      @jmrico1979 3 роки тому +1

      My thoughts exactly. Although I'm pretty sure it was a low order detonation. Judging by the videos of tirpitz being attacked by tallboys, those explosions were massive.

    • @martinwew
      @martinwew 3 роки тому +3

      Luckily nuclear warheads are less likely to randomly explode, but would be a rather bad day I imagine....

    • @barthoving2053
      @barthoving2053 3 роки тому

      @@jmrico1979 Apparently they tried to burn the torpex which obvious went wrong. Seeing that a tunnel/aquaduct was close blowing it up was not a good idea. I doubt if the torpex had contact with water as the bomb was high grade steel and thick walled as it was designed to smash deep into the ground. It easily could have survived the impact with the water and bottom intact. And bombs and mine can survive that long. They are still a thread for fishersman in the Northsea.

    • @calvingreene90
      @calvingreene90 3 роки тому

      At worst it would be a dirty bomb.

    • @mannys9130
      @mannys9130 3 роки тому

      Yes, at worst a jettisoned nuke would be a dirty bomb, but it would be an ecological disaster. :( A nuke with safeties in place is highly unlikely to detonate correctly. It's interesting to imagine though, that it could be recover and operated successfully by unauthorized parties... If the Tallboy was internally intact and viable, a nuke could be too.

  • @Menddoxs
    @Menddoxs 3 роки тому +22

    @Drachinifel , In your last stream, I suggest you add the Ning Hai Class Light Cruisers(light cruisers built by Imperial Japan for the Republic of China back in the time before ww2) into your list if u had not done so, I hope u see this comment
    Edit r 4 spelling errors

    • @Psike81
      @Psike81 3 роки тому +8

      Could probably add in the footnote, "not very well known in modern times until China resurrected them as a pair of jailbaiting waifus"

    • @mahiru20ten
      @mahiru20ten 3 роки тому

      @@Psike81 Dammit.

  • @toonsis
    @toonsis 3 роки тому +2

    A beautiful ship, love the big gun on a small hull concept. This was all moot with the new found power of the airplane

  • @agesflow6815
    @agesflow6815 3 роки тому +11

    Thank you, Drachinifel.

  • @bigblue6917
    @bigblue6917 3 роки тому +9

    The RAF left one Tallboy behind. Just in case Lutzow made a return.
    Soviet pilots pretending to be Spanish. Then North Korean and possibly North Vietnamese. It would be interesting to see their passports.

  • @mytube001
    @mytube001 3 роки тому +3

    Really elegant and graceful ship! Gotta be one of the best looking of its era!

  • @SonOfAB_tch2ndClass
    @SonOfAB_tch2ndClass 3 роки тому +14

    Ah yes the return of the British Acme Anvil!

    • @andrewreilly8791
      @andrewreilly8791 3 роки тому +3

      I now have an image of Lutzow with a tiny umbrella open on her main mast

    • @SonOfAB_tch2ndClass
      @SonOfAB_tch2ndClass 3 роки тому +2

      @@andrewreilly8791 I imagine the Shadow of Impending Doom slowly appearing on her and Tirpitz both will have a "HELP!" sign in German!

  • @AdurianJ
    @AdurianJ 3 роки тому +1

    Lützow was engaged by the Korpåsen Battery on the 9th of April 1940.
    The battery was a modern 15cm battery and it forced her to retreat out of gun range after suffering heavy damage.

  • @GaldirEonai
    @GaldirEonai 3 роки тому +11

    F for that brave drone.

  • @simonwood1402
    @simonwood1402 Рік тому

    Should give that Drone a medal 🏅 Gone But Not Forgotten 👍

  • @Greystar2426
    @Greystar2426 3 роки тому +1

    I always loved the design of the Deutschlands, especially given their commerce surface raider roles. Evading enemy fleets and attacking merchant ships definitely gives off swashbuckling vibes.

  • @stegspalter2124
    @stegspalter2124 3 роки тому +2

    Nice window dressing 2:31

  • @stevep5408
    @stevep5408 3 роки тому

    Thanks, you were the first source who explained the tall boy detonated on a drone. I was trying to work out how it detonated during defusing operations and no one was injured!

  • @stevevalley7835
    @stevevalley7835 3 роки тому +1

    I read an account of the RAF torpedo bomber attack on the Lutzow. It was at night, and the Lutzow had several DDs as escort. None of the German ships fired a shot at the attacking Beaufort, so it was able to get in close and make a solid hit. Apparently, the German crews were told there was a Ju-88 operating in the area that night, and mistook the Beaufort for that 88.

    • @disunityholychaos7523
      @disunityholychaos7523 3 роки тому

      wait.. is it some article?, book source or wiki? i wanted to search it up.

    • @stevevalley7835
      @stevevalley7835 3 роки тому +1

      @@disunityholychaos7523 that account is in a book by Ralph Barker. It was published in the US as "Torpedo Bomber" a paperback from Ballantine in the early 70s. It was also published in the UK as "Ship-Busters". The book covers Beaufort ops in the North Sea and Channel, then moves to ops in the Med around Malta, then moves back to ops around England late in the war. I found it a fascinating read. Besides the attack on the Lutzow, it covers the torpedoing of Gneisenau in Brest and the "channel dash" when Scharnhorst and Gneisenau ran up the English Channel, in broad daylight, and a lot more.

  • @mattwoodard2535
    @mattwoodard2535 3 роки тому +12

    The poor brave drone never felt a thing. sm

  • @lukedogwalker
    @lukedogwalker 3 роки тому +13

    02:30 those portholes/windows have curtains! Is that the officers mess, or the Captain's stern cabin?

    • @slavkovalsky1671
      @slavkovalsky1671 3 роки тому +1

      Those are pretty small guns for a capital ship over that comfy little structure, but still, can't be very safe or comfortable when they have to be fired. I'm wondering about the blast effects...

    • @UnintentionalSubmarine
      @UnintentionalSubmarine 3 роки тому +2

      Most likely the officers mess. The stern of the superstructure was a reasonably common place for that. Meanwhile the captain's quarters were most often placed in the main superstructure, and I know that Graf Spee had the captain's quarters there too, so it isn't too much of a stretch to assume the same held true for Deutschland/Lützow. Though it should be noted the two ships had rather different main superstructures, so a difference in that placement wouldn't be too weird.

    • @lawrencelewis8105
      @lawrencelewis8105 3 роки тому +3

      "The captain told no jokes. He was astern captain." I recall that from Mad magazine when I was a kid.

  • @justathought958
    @justathought958 3 роки тому +1

    I once met an unapologetic German.........he said "We should have had more u-boats." In a sick but remarkably thoughtful way, I do believe he hit the nail on the head, IF hindsight be as 20/20 as we think. When we look back on these "not one thing or the other" constructions, we wonder.......what WERE the Nazis thinking of with this ship? It was a sea going Tiger tank that could be, and was, ultimately surrounded by a bunch of Shermans and suffered death by a thousand cuts. The ship was a big thumb your middle finger at the English and French but as a realistic ANYTHING..........surface combatant or raider.......... it was like bringing your penny loafers to a basketball game. Too slow to be a cruiser, with only two powerful but relatively slow firing turrets, the lummox was a bit of a white elephant from a practical standpoint, far better at making an impression on fools than achieving any viable result. The Joe Biden of bloated cruisers/dietetic battleships. I think the Nazis wanted to achieve something like that of the idiotic Austro-Hungarians who gave us the Szent Istvan!

    • @thomasrotweiler
      @thomasrotweiler 3 роки тому

      Erm, the Deutschland was designed and built before the Nazis took power in 1933.

    • @colbeausabre8842
      @colbeausabre8842 2 роки тому

      France had depended a great deal on its North African colonies in the Great War and one purpose of the class was to interdict communication between the colonies and metropolitan France. The French were concerned enough that they built the Dunkerques as a response. Of course, how realistic the idea of German raiders in the Med - with no bases and facing the choke point at Gib (even if the UK wasn't a belligerent, easy for the Marine Nationale to seal off) is open to question. They also dominated the Baltic - three modern, fast armored cruisers against two decrepit, poorly maintained and worse trained Russian dreadnoughts is pretty good odds. The Swedes and Finns were sympathetic to Germany and poor Poles didn't stand a chance and knew it. They sent most of their fleet to Britain when war broke out.

  • @bencobenco1532
    @bencobenco1532 3 роки тому

    The new year brings a new video from Lord Kamtchatka :-) Many thanks

  • @YAT-YAS_To_The_Extreme
    @YAT-YAS_To_The_Extreme 3 роки тому

    I learn something new every video i watch. Ive always loved history. Especially world history. Im one of an entire line on both parents side that have served. So far ive been able to trace back pre-revolutionary. We even had family fighting each other during the civil war.

  • @fernandomarques5166
    @fernandomarques5166 3 роки тому +3

    I'm excited because the next panzerschiff Drach will cover is Adm. Scheer and she has a interesting fact about her resting place.

  • @hashteraksgage3281
    @hashteraksgage3281 Рік тому +1

    My grandfather saw this ship in a spanish port in the 30's

  • @comentedonakeyboard
    @comentedonakeyboard 2 роки тому

    A sneaky ship, from launch to scuttling

  • @PhantomLover007
    @PhantomLover007 3 роки тому +2

    RIP underwater demolition drone. You served your country well.
    It is pretty normal though that any ship that gets renamed winds up in the briney deep

  • @Luke-tm5oy
    @Luke-tm5oy 3 роки тому

    just wanna say thank you ! I've chosen this this eras war ships as a subject to study, and you are the best teacher !

  • @Sim.Crawford
    @Sim.Crawford 3 роки тому +8

    Considering not even the initial launch went to plan I'm not sure it was the name change what did it...

    • @S0RGEx
      @S0RGEx 3 роки тому +1

      Preemptive bad luck, the universe knew her name would be changed and wanted to get a head start.

  • @lionheartx-ray4135
    @lionheartx-ray4135 3 роки тому +1

    Drach - Proving that changing the can be bad luck.
    USS Phoenix - That for sure.

    • @jmrico1979
      @jmrico1979 3 роки тому

      name maybe?

    • @unclestone8406
      @unclestone8406 3 роки тому +1

      @@jmrico1979
      USS Phoenix was a Brooklyn class light cruiser in WWII, sold to Argentina postwar.
      She had a couple of names in Argentine service if I remember right, but she last went by "General Belgrano".
      Then the Falklands happened.

  • @assessor1276
    @assessor1276 3 роки тому +2

    Very interesting tale of,the service of Lutzow (or lack of it) but I would be interested in a more in-depth look at the technology of the Panzerschiffs. What I know is that they were just about the first large all-welded ships and that almost uniquely among big warships, they were diesel powered.

    • @mrz80
      @mrz80 3 роки тому +1

      One book I read on warships in WWII discusses the design of the Panzerschiff, particularly noting the steps taken to cram such a powerful ship into a 10,000 ton displacement as per Treaty of Versailles restrictions:
      1) Diesel power instead of steam turbines
      2) Extensive use of welding instead of riveting
      3) Understating the displacement by about 30% :D

  • @petershen6924
    @petershen6924 3 роки тому +4

    Deutschland class pocket battleship is my favorite in WoW.

    • @rblinson8136
      @rblinson8136 3 роки тому

      One of the tankiest cruisers at tier 6, but holy hell those guns do NOT represent German gunnery accuracy.

    • @wheels-n-tires1846
      @wheels-n-tires1846 3 роки тому

      Been thinking about getting it forever.... Is it any good???
      Love the ship historically but...

    • @rblinson8136
      @rblinson8136 3 роки тому

      @@wheels-n-tires1846 It's a powerful ship for tier 6. DPM is very low, though. 20 second reload for only 6 barrels in 2 turrets. Being a tier 6 cruiser, can't do a secondary build either. When facing same tier or lower she's (he's?) a goddamn tank. Being bottom tier is a fast way back to port, even though you have a heal.

  • @matthewrobinson4323
    @matthewrobinson4323 3 роки тому

    Excellent video.

  • @speeddensity9543
    @speeddensity9543 3 роки тому +8

    This video is dedicated to the brave bomb defusal drone. 5:50 My its sacrifice be remembered.😢

  • @champagnegascogne9755
    @champagnegascogne9755 3 роки тому +8

    *"Hmph! I'm Deutschland, the first ship of the Deutschland-class! A prestigious individual such as myself wouldn't be sent into smaller battles. As such, it's only natural that I don't have many of these petty achievements. It's called spiritual leadership! Hmph! Lützow? ...Shut up! Like I'd care about that!"*
    *"From now on, you are Deutschland's servant! You should feel honored. Also, don't answer me with "mhm." You will answer me with "yes, ma'am" from now on. Are we clear?"*

    • @Scarheart76
      @Scarheart76 3 роки тому +1

      Someone plays Azur Lane.

    • @navalbaguette784
      @navalbaguette784 3 роки тому

      What a clear difference from your sister Graffy...hmmmm...... Well, I guess you'll kill me for thinking about her anyways...

  • @robrowe2298
    @robrowe2298 3 роки тому

    Excellent as ever

  • @Graham-ce2yk
    @Graham-ce2yk 3 роки тому

    Good episode. I was reminded of a self-published on Amazon novel ('Ring On Main Engines' by Anthony Molloy, 2013) where the plotline is that after Hitler's taken some of his 'special' pills (speed) he has the brilliant idea of running the Channel Dash in reverse. The resulting task force ('Gruppe Wurger') which comprises Tirpitz, Scharnhorst, Lutzow and around twelve destroyers does not get too far before the speed has worn off and they get a recall, helped on their way by a Dunconian bluff on the part of some British Destroyers.

  • @SteffenMeyer101
    @SteffenMeyer101 3 роки тому +1

    beautiful ship design

  • @leftcoaster67
    @leftcoaster67 3 роки тому

    Happy New Year Drach! Thanks for everything!

  • @rickopich3727
    @rickopich3727 3 роки тому

    I enjoy your posts by much. I especially enjoy the design/development histories. The histories of destroyer design were top notch but the last one left me hanging when there was no follow up on destroyer development in the Second World War. A history of the USN’s Fletcher, Sumner & Gearing classes would be welcome as well as coverage of the RN & IJN efforts to compensate for their respective lack of high angle and dual purpose heavy anti aircraft weapons.

  • @TheFreaker86
    @TheFreaker86 2 роки тому

    I heard about the tallboy bomb going off when it made it into the news. But I didn't realize that it was connected to the Lützow

  • @suflanker45
    @suflanker45 3 роки тому +2

    Let's call these ships for what they really were. Modern (for their time) pre-dreadnoughts. Respects to the brave drone that drew the short straw and was a red shirt.

    • @johnshepherd8687
      @johnshepherd8687 3 роки тому +1

      Although built for commerce raiding they are more like a battlecruiser or cruiser killer than a pre-Dreadnaught. They have heavy cruiser armor with bigger guns. They would probably loose a slugging match with late pre-Dreadnaughts.

    • @jonathanlong6987
      @jonathanlong6987 3 роки тому +1

      The ultimate armored cruisers.

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 3 роки тому

      @@jonathanlong6987 They were hardly armored cruisers. Their belts and decks were feeble. 3 inch belts and 1.8 inch decks.

    • @colbeausabre8842
      @colbeausabre8842 2 роки тому

      @@jonathanlong6987 Precisely. They along with the Dunkerques, Scharhorsts and Alaskas were all big gun armored cruisers or as the USN called them, Large Cruisers (the term "Dreadnought Armored Cruiser" had been the original rating of the Invincibles before the term "Battlecruiser" was coined)

  • @lanselithgow5865
    @lanselithgow5865 3 роки тому +1

    Classic Drach!!! - 'a rather brave drone...'!!!
    Should it be awarded a DSM (Drone Submersible Medal)?!

  • @Malak_V
    @Malak_V 3 роки тому +1

    This one hell of along time to come, cant wait for the scheer later

  • @MarshFlyFightWin
    @MarshFlyFightWin 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome been waiting for the other Pocket Battleships. Hope to see Admiral Scheer next

  • @rblinson8136
    @rblinson8136 3 роки тому +2

    Fun fact, in America a 24 fluid ounce beer can is also a Tall Boy.

    • @ottovonbismarck2443
      @ottovonbismarck2443 3 роки тому

      Problem is, it doesn't contain REAL beer. Anyway, canned beer is barbaric. With best regards from Germany, have a Happy New Year, cheers ! :-)

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 9 місяців тому

      @@ottovonbismarck2443there was a vending machine that sold cans of Bitburg in my barracks (Rose Kaserne, Bad Kreuznach). Did the job. But 6packs of Becks in bottles was only $1.75 at the post exchange. 1984.

  • @blogsblogs2348
    @blogsblogs2348 3 роки тому +10

    A bit too brief... there's loads of interesting things known about this ship

  • @Werner4voss
    @Werner4voss 3 роки тому +1

    I somewhat happen to like more of these underdog ships than to fancy capital ships. Nice Video!

  • @messerschmitt7240
    @messerschmitt7240 3 роки тому +1

    I think everyone knows about Admiral Scheer . Lutzow class panzerschiffe which is now know as a nickname "The buried battleship".

    • @wheels-n-tires1846
      @wheels-n-tires1846 3 роки тому

      As a kid, dreamed of digging her up and rebuilding her as the awesomest personal yacht...🤣
      Lots of research, but never could find out how much was actually left before burial...😞

    • @messerschmitt7240
      @messerschmitt7240 3 роки тому

      I am thinking too

    • @disunityholychaos7523
      @disunityholychaos7523 3 роки тому

      @@wheels-n-tires1846 im still puzzled where she is actually buried when i checked the map of her last location, some say in or near the parkingllot or below the trees, but im worried it is also a burial ground of the leftover remains of the dead sailors in below her ship and then buried with it.

  • @bountyscrew3986
    @bountyscrew3986 3 роки тому

    Thanks drachnifel! Love the videos as always!

  • @tomhutchins7495
    @tomhutchins7495 5 місяців тому

    Amusingly enough, the Admiralty tried to deny 617 Squadron the status of having sunk Lutzow on the grounds that her superstructure was still above water. Of course, they were benefitting from this same logic in the Mediterranean, so I guess they had a vested interest.

  • @24HoLTeam93
    @24HoLTeam93 3 роки тому +2

    One more cool thing about that tallboy: you can probably see it go IN the water in the sequence starting at 0:52 in this video: ua-cam.com/video/vt4iqwkTJkQ/v-deo.html - note that one of the splashes is much smaller than the others, and is at the right spot in the channel.
    Credit: A poster on The War Zone noticed this first. And so did someone else in the comments.

  • @gokbay3057
    @gokbay3057 3 роки тому

    This ship has a march written for her. Just a melody with no words iirc.
    "Panzerschiff Deutschland"

  • @BigBossMan2000
    @BigBossMan2000 3 роки тому +2

    It seems Lutzow was luckier than HMS Hood.

  • @alanrogers7090
    @alanrogers7090 3 роки тому

    Thanks for this episode. I would like to see a story about the USS West Virginia, (the Wee Vee), as I am from that state originally, and I always found the fact of her resurrection at Pearl Harbor to return to the front lines inspiring. Could you PLEASE? Happy New Year, and many more.

  • @pyronuke4768
    @pyronuke4768 3 роки тому +1

    "Trust me; it's a cruiser. I swear it is."

  • @toothedacorn4724
    @toothedacorn4724 3 роки тому +2

    F in chat for EOD drone, lost but not forgotten

  • @HSMiyamoto
    @HSMiyamoto 3 роки тому +1

    This history helps illustrates how Hitler's rage against the Kriegsmarine surface fleet should have been focused on the Luftwaffe for failing to prevent air attacks against the Navy. These sailors gave their all but, "for zem, die var vast ovah" as early as the Norway campaign. Such is the folly of war.

    • @edvonrattlehead2135
      @edvonrattlehead2135 3 роки тому

      the luftwaffe was also to blame for germany never getting into aircraft carriers

    • @colbeausabre8842
      @colbeausabre8842 2 роки тому

      @@edvonrattlehead2135 No, that - like most things German in that war - was a victim of Hitler going east

  • @badkittynomilktonight3334
    @badkittynomilktonight3334 3 роки тому

    Re the Blucher, watch the opening of The Kings Choice to see how effective pre-WW1 whitehead torpedoes, 19th century shore guns in an 18th century fort were against a ship so new the paint hadn't dried yet.

  • @ronniefarnsworth6465
    @ronniefarnsworth6465 3 роки тому +1

    Better use for all those tons of steel would be to melt it down for 400+ Panther tanks could be made !!

  • @mfletch3205
    @mfletch3205 3 роки тому +2

    I hope they find her wreck. Graf Zeppelin was found,wonder when they find Luitzow.

    • @packr72
      @packr72 3 роки тому +1

      Well they recently found Karlsruhe so it’s possible they locate it. Leipzig is out there too looking to be discovered.

  • @Simitar2
    @Simitar2 3 роки тому +1

    Hellou
    Drachinifel. I have little-small-tiny ship with great histori for review - siviet monitor Железняков (Zheleznyakov). It is in Kyiw. Igor Jevgeněvič Vsevoložskij wrote nice book about this ship - Neulovimyj Monitor (1959)

    • @Drachinifel
      @Drachinifel  3 роки тому +1

      Is she still there?

    • @Simitar2
      @Simitar2 3 роки тому

      ​@@Drachinifel Yes. On the banks of the Dnieper It is sad that literature is only in Russian... Funny fact is, that this ship fought from Izmail (on Danube) to Novorossiysk and back to Danube.. And ends his WWII journey in Vienna. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_monitor_Zhelezniakov wiki.wargaming.net/ru/Navy:%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8B_%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B0_%C2%AB%D0%96%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BD%D1%8F%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%C2%BB ua-cam.com/video/qnB98p4qnf4/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/T7grCRpVjwo/v-deo.html

  • @stormtrooper7177
    @stormtrooper7177 3 роки тому

    Actually being awake 14 minutes after a release is nice

  • @mpetersen6
    @mpetersen6 3 роки тому

    I think this was the Duetch version of "please Mr Custer, I don't wanna go"

  • @thhseeking
    @thhseeking 3 роки тому

    She and other German capital ships might have made a better showing if the "Bohemian Corporal" hadn't ordered that said ships should engage equal or stronger forces. Unlike the RN where smaller units routinely engaged much larger units.

  • @finnsvensson9790
    @finnsvensson9790 3 роки тому

    Very nice video, only one thing, the Kriegsmarine didn't use the KMS infront of their ships names. The Kaiserliche Marine used SMS, but germany stopped using prefixes after 1918.

  • @bryant7201
    @bryant7201 3 роки тому +1

    Alas poor brave drone, we barely knew thee.

  • @jeffrey8847
    @jeffrey8847 3 роки тому +1

    I think the 11-inch guns, while interesting was the wrong choice for the role they were supposed to do as you don't have the penetration to take on battleships while being overkill for everything else but limiting ammo that can be carried and weighing a whole lot.

    • @WALTERBROADDUS
      @WALTERBROADDUS 3 роки тому

      Wrong. The role was killing merchant ships. It's guns are plenty for the job. It's designed to outrun a battleship.

    • @jeffrey8847
      @jeffrey8847 3 роки тому +1

      @@WALTERBROADDUS 1.Deutschland/Lutzow could not out run battleships as it only had a speed of 28 knots which most battleship could do or where faster.
      2. If the the role was killing merchant ships an 11-inch gun is massive over kill an 8 or 6 inch gun would work fine and weigh less.

    • @WALTERBROADDUS
      @WALTERBROADDUS 3 роки тому +1

      The US and UK had no battleships of that speed when built. The guns let them outgun any heavy cruiser that could catch them.

    • @jeffrey8847
      @jeffrey8847 3 роки тому +1

      @@WALTERBROADDUS The UK had the Hood, Renown & Repulse and considering that Admiral Graf Spee was mission killed and then forced to scuttled by two light and one heavy cruiser it really did not outgun its way out because of the slow rate of fire and running out of ammo.

    • @jeffrey8847
      @jeffrey8847 3 роки тому

      If I was redesigning the Deutschland class, I would replace the 11-inch guns for 8-inch guns on a one to one base & change the 8 15cm (5.9 in) & the 3 8.8cm (3.5 in) for a uniform 12.7cm (5.04 inch) if a dual-purpose mount could be made or 10.5cm (4.1 inch) to have a useful secondary battery for anti-ship and anti-aircraft. With the lighter weight of the armament, I would try to increase the speed to 32 knots so it could work in the cruiser line and round out the armor.

  • @MililaniJag
    @MililaniJag 3 роки тому

    Great info! Cheers!

  • @sreckocuvalo8110
    @sreckocuvalo8110 3 роки тому

    Drone: ''Sup grandpa wanna go to a retirement home?''
    Tallboy: ''KABOOM?!?!''

  • @mchebornek
    @mchebornek 3 роки тому +1

    I can I can can do it, one more repair and it's on, weee, look at me go.

  • @patrickwentz8413
    @patrickwentz8413 3 роки тому

    That drone was the last casualty of WW II.

  • @davidcashin1894
    @davidcashin1894 9 місяців тому +1

    Still campaigning for a separate video on KMS Adm Scheer, the most successful of the class and the only one without it's own video.......

  • @yaki_ebiko
    @yaki_ebiko 3 роки тому +3

    Are there any records of Tall boy usage and recorded hits?
    Because I am now really worried to travel ANYWHERE near Tirpitz sank

    • @tokul76
      @tokul76 3 роки тому +3

      Stay close to Thames estuary and you will be fine :) No tallboys there. Only one Liberty ship.

    • @Ardelanin
      @Ardelanin 3 роки тому

      @@tokul76 isn't that a liberty ship packed to the brim with unexploded shells though? probably best advice would be to just not go anywhere near the coast in europe. though even inland. well.. we still find ordnance every few years in NL as well.

    • @tokul76
      @tokul76 3 роки тому

      @@Ardelanin There was a smile in post. The point was that there are far worse things than unexploded Tallboy. I think your neighbors in Flanders got at least two unexploded explosive stashes in Messines.

  • @johnvitro5908
    @johnvitro5908 3 роки тому

    Cool

  • @brentkeller3826
    @brentkeller3826 3 роки тому

    Tallboy "you're approaching me?"
    Drone "How can I defuze you if I don't?"
    Tallboy 'Zawardo!"

  • @justinbiro2884
    @justinbiro2884 3 роки тому

    I would like you to cover the ship USS Kidd. It would be nice to cover both the past ships and the current one to see how she lives up to the name. I know the WWII one is a floating museum in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and I have a few pictures of it.

  • @davidorama6690
    @davidorama6690 3 роки тому

    Love these little German heavy crui... Er, pocket battlesh... Er, ...sers...

    • @KatyushaLauncher
      @KatyushaLauncher 3 роки тому

      The most real designation of them are Panzerschiffes

    • @colbeausabre8842
      @colbeausabre8842 2 роки тому

      @@KatyushaLauncher Armored Cruisers - look 'em up

  • @felixtheswiss
    @felixtheswiss 3 роки тому

    Used effectively as an oversized antitank gun during the german retreat

  • @Charlie-fk4ly
    @Charlie-fk4ly 3 роки тому +1

    Cool, something for my pockets

  • @Someone-else-what
    @Someone-else-what 3 роки тому +1

    Drach posts : HMS? I sleep. KMS? Real shit.