Diablocritics - Responding to the "Historical Adam"!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @Tommy_Stewart
    @Tommy_Stewart Місяць тому +1

    “My pleading is specialer than yours.” 😂

  • @scienceexplains302
    @scienceexplains302 2 місяці тому

    *Science “vs” faith*
    Science is about finding what is most likely true and doing one’s best to ignore preconceptions.
    Faith is about accepting what you’re told.
    Although the two could sometimes come to the same conclusions, they are diametrically opposite approaches.

  • @AurorXZ
    @AurorXZ 2 місяці тому +1

    An excellent discussion. A question: I have (and love!) the Anchor Bible Dictionary. What scholarly resource would you recommend using instead?

    • @JenniferBirdPhD
      @JenniferBirdPhD  Місяць тому +1

      @@AurorXZ This is actually a problem! That is part of the reason I brought it up. It’s quite rich, but also deeply problematic. I’ll let you know when something else replaces it! 😉

    • @AurorXZ
      @AurorXZ Місяць тому +1

      @@JenniferBirdPhD Thank you Dr. Bird!

  • @flgirl8472
    @flgirl8472 2 місяці тому +1

    I missed the live.

  • @scienceexplains302
    @scienceexplains302 2 місяці тому

    *Bible Against Evolution*
    Summary
    At least six lines of reasoning show creationism in general, the Bible, and specifically Noah’s Flood, to be incompatible with the overwhelming evidence for evolution:
    1. Created, yet evolved?
    2. Diversification of life over time
    3. Differences among animal types at a given time
    4. Animal classification
    5. Commonality of DNA across “kinds”
    6. Population bottlenecks
    7. Location of origination

  • @robertjimenez5984
    @robertjimenez5984 2 місяці тому +1

    Adam and Eve is as historical as Peter Pan.
    Now let’s write a book about the historicity of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell🤦‍♂️