The 6950xt is mostly out of stock anyways, its not worth considering purchasing anyways when you can grab a 7900 GRE which performs the same and has a lower power draw
I hope they name the next-gen RX 8000 "Navi 48" GPU as RX 8700 XT, and priced at $429 max. It's ridiculous if it will perform like a 7900 XT while competing with the 5070 and then calling it a 8800 XT (Yes, the 7800 XT naming is ridiculous too).
@@adlibconstitution1609 it is possible, just not realistic. AMD, will cash out on GPU as long as they can get away with it Nvidia clear is whipping the competition and milking the customer base. AMD's best move is to follow Nvidia while proposing slightly lower price to compensate for their bit on par proposition. If you want an affordable GPU, your best option is hoping Intel Battlemage are a good leap in quality, keep the pricing tr ND of the A750 and A770.
The next 8700 xt will perform the same as 7800 xt at $500 with 12Gbs of 128 bit gddr7 vram only with improved ray tracing performance matching the 4060Ti
@@capuducul I doubt Intel will keep prices as low as they are now. But maybe they will do what AMD did to get market share by selling cheap. But they can't drag that on as long as AMD. Unless they are gonna do some interesting innovation with their hardware to make it cheaper to make. That's a dream though.
im from new zealand so the 4070 ti super costs about $1500 and i managed to snatch a 6950xt for $850 which was a really good deal and im very happy with this cards performance
It's still crazy to me that even a 4070 super beats the 6950xt at most times. Crazy times we sre in for pc games with gpus. I will say people been downplaying amd all year meanwhile the 7900xtx is out here beast moving everything natively at a 4080 super level with the latest drivers. Can't be mad at that even though nvidia has an edge still idk I think both are amazing this year.
Crazy high prices, and that's about it. Otherwise it's normal to expect a previous generation flagship card to lose out to 2nd or 3rd Tier card from a newer generations. I don't know why people do not expect this, but it goes to show people don't know about graphics cards from years ago. The GTX 1070 beats out the GTX 980ti except in Passmark(Passmark is a terrible metric for GPU performance), the GTX 660ti beats out the Radeon 6970, the GTX 970 edges out the R9 290x, the Radeon 5850 beats out the GTX 280, and the list goes on and on.
all these video is 1440p and by allocated VRAM usage ( graphic quality) the 6950XT still beat the 4070ti S. the 4070ti S look more blurry to generated more FPS and is pretty obvious the see difference of image quality on 32" 1440p LG Utlragears monitor.
Absolute bull what a atupid rumor thats been put to rest over and over again. Only person saying that now is one guy who bought a 4080 just to bash it. Believe me thousands of people and content creators have already talked on it and found there is no difference in image quality. Only some games when they are more amd focused or more nvidia but that goes back and forth. There is a reason why nvidia wins in shadows, lighting and more which btw can make or break the look of a game. Btw nvidia has a new feature called vibrant and you can utilize it to pull more details out of colors and make it even richer which that guy never showed once he didn't even try it. So now nvidia can now be even more vibrant then amd. I may make a video on it soon because nobody talks about the setting and it can make the image as dense and rich as you want with more detail. @690Dragonx
@@reviewforthetube6485 i think you have eyes issue, you need to wear glasse, get a better monitor, or know fact as more vram usage is more beautiful image quality
@@traelkel8789 yea that's what i am looking forward to if those claims are actually true and i think it would make sense considering rdna 3 and rtx 30 series both have their 2nd gen rt cores. right now with rtx 40 series nvidia is a gen ahead of amd and amd is still playing catch. rdna 4 is where we might get a gpu similar to the performance of 4070ti super both in rasterization and rt performance considering it would have 3rd gen rt cores same as rtx 40 series.
RX 6950XT is awesome and AMD is doing pretty well now with their GPU's. Just make sure you update to the latest AMD graphics drivers. There are always fixes and improvements with every update. I can see AMD in the next 1 or 2 years overtaking Nvidia in the world market. Good Job!
Hello,👋 I’ve been watching your videos on UA-cam 😁for a long time and am one of your subscribers. It’s interesting to see how your channel develops. I have a few questions: Do you mainly prefer to buy game keys or do you use any game subscription services, such as Xbox Game Pass?🧐 I’m also curious about which software you use to edit your videos, if it’s not a secret. What is the name of the program you use to display your PC specs? And one more question: how much time does it take for you to shoot, edit, and publish a video? I would be grateful if you could answer.🙏
You can use msi afterburner,to display these specs on the screen, (specifically the rivatuner part of it) and they probably edit with something like Adobe After Effects to do basic cuts and show visual graphs etc.
P tu compensar a diferença de 250 dólares em energia você precisaria facilmente de mais de 6 anos jogando igual um doente umas 60 horas por semana, se você for assumir o melhor cenário p Nvidia em que a placa da AMD consome 350 e a 70 consome 250 dá 6kW semanais e 256 kW por ano (42 semanas) e uns 290kW com a fonte a uns 88% de eficiência, o preço médio do kW nos EUA sai por $0,17, o que dá 49,3 dólares por ano, ou seja, mais de 5 anos p tirar a diferença mesmo em um cenário extremo e irrealista, sem falar da possubilidade de undervolt
5700x3d/5800x3d, 16gb dual rank 3600 lowish latency DD R4, cheapest pcie3 M2 SSD that has some dram cache, cheapest motherboard that supports pho, and then put the rest into a GPU... Nvidia push Ray tracing down your throat but unless you're spending £1200+ on the GPU alone, then RT is a waste of time honestly... However IMO dlss is superior to far, so it's still worth going with a midrange Nvidia GPU, if you're even slightly an Nvidia fanboy... A second hand 3080-12g is cheap AF and performs well at upto 1440p, gives okay 1080p RT performance & supports dlss...
AMD alternative would be 6800xt or better or 7800xt or better... They only support fsr upscaling as opposed to Nvidia which supports fsr and dlss... The 6800xt categorically is uselessly bad at RT, and whilst the 7800xt is significantly better it's still novelty factor rather than daily gaming option.... The 6800xt is a touch faster than the 3080 in rasterisation, but with the slightly better dlss, many games draw even again
@@Ehren1337 fair comment on the future upgradability especially with AMD 9000 soon to be released... In which case 6000mts low latency ddr5 for the ram, which doesn't need to be expensive these days, either 👍
We are in 2024, is time to change games of 2018. Need this The first descendant Steel nomad Hellblade 2 Bodycam Avatar FoP Dragon's Dogma 2 XDefiant Oucast - a new beginning Banishers And all need RT tests where available
Nvidia has put the pedal to the metal and leaving AMD behind. Reports show next Gen AMD Graphics cards will not be any faster than current gen while RTX 5000 will show a 20-30% bump in performance. No pricing has been leaked but if it is say as current pricing structure there will be zero reason to consider AMD Graphic Cards..
this is such a stupid comment, the only reason people consider buying amd cards is because they're so much cheaper than nvidia while always giving more performance, look at the rtx 3050 and rx 6600,or the 4060 and 6700xt,or the 7700xt and 4060ti, or the 4070s and 7900gre
Estás mal , AMD no hará GPUs gama alta en la serie RX 8000 , pero hará gama baja y media siendo la más potente una con rendimiento superior a una RX 7900 xt y costando 400-600$ Y Nvidia ganó mercado por qué se toma en cuenta las GPU compradas para IA , si contamos solo las GPU para gaming el número sería mejor para AMD
all these video is 1440p and by allocated VRAM usage ( graphic quality) the 6950XT still beat the 4070ti S. the 4070ti S look more blurry to generated more FPS and is pretty obvious on 32" 1440p LG Utlragears monitors. on 4K resolution the 6950XT still easy beat the 4070ti super
60 fps is not enough you need more fps and you probally gonna use ray tracing with this high-end graphic cards also fsr can't match with dlss power consumption is too lower on 4070 ti super finally if you're making videos or live Nvidia has some features for content creaters this are the reasons for buying 4070 ti super
@@GodSlayerJokerel RT no vale la pena , el dlss y fsr están más parejos de lo que tu crees , lo que pasa es que la gente compra dlss 3.7 con fsr2 y así es obvio cual será mejor , es como comparar dlss1 vs fsr 2.2
It's also last gen, and mostly out of stock so you cant find it regularly anymore. A 7900XT is around 680$ and still 120$ cheaper, but is faster in raster
@@ryankhelil1512 its not 5% to 13.5% its literally 13.5% for these 10 games ,what are u smoking man? sometimes rtx 4070ti s is better 25% in new games. Learn your math
6950XT was 80% less fps than 4070TIS with RTX, and I saw the record about 4070TIS vs 7900XT, the fps difference was as same as in 4K. It seems to there is no different between RDNA2 and RDNA3 when RTX on !?
@@PCBenchmarkingHub You think he gets paid enough monthly to sustain himself solely on youtube? Im really curious because for the past month theres only one video over 30k views
@@Rechinu1 the dude has +500mil subs, with a couple dozen videos that have +1mil views. He probably makes enough off this channel to buy whatever hardware he wants.
Ad - 0:00
Games :
Alan Wake 2 - 0:06
Cyberpunk 2077 - 0:47
Cyberpunk 2077 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 1:46
Hogwarts Legacy - 2:43
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 3:37
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:36
Assassin's Creed Mirage - 5:43
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 6:41
Ghost of Tsushima - 7:46
Starfield - 8:47
Horizon Forbidden West - 9:43
System:
Windows 11
Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16GB - bit.ly/3vNwtSK
RADEON RX 6950 XT 16GB - bit.ly/37yvUQW
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Nice
6950XT vs 7800XT vs 7900 GRE would make for a great roundup at their current price
We need this the battle of 500-550$ 16gb gpus
The Rx 6950xt was $1100 at launch.
They are not comparable.
@@adlibconstitution1609 that doesnt mean anything, its about their current prices
The 6950xt is mostly out of stock anyways, its not worth considering purchasing anyways when you can grab a 7900 GRE which performs the same and has a lower power draw
@@robertopazsoldan9641 Well, in real world for 500$ the best you can buy is 7700xt. But good dream, good dream.
I hope they name the next-gen RX 8000 "Navi 48" GPU as RX 8700 XT, and priced at $429 max. It's ridiculous if it will perform like a 7900 XT while competing with the 5070 and then calling it a 8800 XT (Yes, the 7800 XT naming is ridiculous too).
A $429 GPU as fast as a 7900xt is not possible.
There are a lot of ways to say you're poor, why you choose the most humiliating one?
@@adlibconstitution1609 it is possible, just not realistic.
AMD, will cash out on GPU as long as they can get away with it
Nvidia clear is whipping the competition and milking the customer base.
AMD's best move is to follow Nvidia while proposing slightly lower price to compensate for their bit on par proposition.
If you want an affordable GPU, your best option is hoping Intel Battlemage are a good leap in quality, keep the pricing tr ND of the A750 and A770.
The next 8700 xt will perform the same as 7800 xt at $500 with 12Gbs of 128 bit gddr7 vram only with improved ray tracing performance matching the 4060Ti
@@capuducul I doubt Intel will keep prices as low as they are now.
But maybe they will do what AMD did to get market share by selling cheap. But they can't drag that on as long as AMD.
Unless they are gonna do some interesting innovation with their hardware to make it cheaper to make.
That's a dream though.
im from new zealand so the 4070 ti super costs about $1500 and i managed to snatch a 6950xt for $850 which was a really good deal and im very happy with this cards performance
Wow, previous Gen GPU vs current Gen GPU, small FPS boost from previous Gen to current Gen, excellent work AMD
bhai ap yahan kiya kr rhe ho 😢😂🤣
@@humayoonxpro3220 😅
AMD have really gotta improve on power consumption
Amd cards draw less than nvidia cards) thats top tire card that compets with rtx 3090ti and it is actully less powerhungry then 3090ti)
That was a 6000 series they improved with the 7000
The comparison is of a TSMC 7nm GPU against a modified/custom 5nm GPU. You should expect the latter to win in power consumption metrics.
@@akira4338 you forgot 4060 vs 7600 power consumption
@@Hanginthere4100 120w vs 150w. Not a big deal
It's still crazy to me that even a 4070 super beats the 6950xt at most times. Crazy times we sre in for pc games with gpus. I will say people been downplaying amd all year meanwhile the 7900xtx is out here beast moving everything natively at a 4080 super level with the latest drivers. Can't be mad at that even though nvidia has an edge still idk I think both are amazing this year.
Crazy high prices, and that's about it. Otherwise it's normal to expect a previous generation flagship card to lose out to 2nd or 3rd Tier card from a newer generations. I don't know why people do not expect this, but it goes to show people don't know about graphics cards from years ago.
The GTX 1070 beats out the GTX 980ti except in Passmark(Passmark is a terrible metric for GPU performance), the GTX 660ti beats out the Radeon 6970, the GTX 970 edges out the R9 290x, the Radeon 5850 beats out the GTX 280, and the list goes on and on.
@@ZiZo34344 I was talking about a 4070 super it's why I said even a 4070 super I didn't say that's what he was showing.
all these video is 1440p and by allocated VRAM usage ( graphic quality) the 6950XT still beat the 4070ti S. the 4070ti S look more blurry to generated more FPS and is pretty obvious the see difference of image quality on 32" 1440p LG Utlragears monitor.
Absolute bull what a atupid rumor thats been put to rest over and over again. Only person saying that now is one guy who bought a 4080 just to bash it. Believe me thousands of people and content creators have already talked on it and found there is no difference in image quality. Only some games when they are more amd focused or more nvidia but that goes back and forth. There is a reason why nvidia wins in shadows, lighting and more which btw can make or break the look of a game. Btw nvidia has a new feature called vibrant and you can utilize it to pull more details out of colors and make it even richer which that guy never showed once he didn't even try it. So now nvidia can now be even more vibrant then amd. I may make a video on it soon because nobody talks about the setting and it can make the image as dense and rich as you want with more detail. @690Dragonx
@@reviewforthetube6485 i think you have eyes issue, you need to wear glasse, get a better monitor, or know fact as more vram usage is more beautiful image quality
great now let's see 3090ti vs 7900xtx including RT results or maybe 7800xt vs 3080 including Rt
Escuche que el RT de las RTX 3000 y RX 7000 son muy similares
@@traelkel8789 yea that's what i am looking forward to if those claims are actually true and i think it would make sense considering rdna 3 and rtx 30 series both have their 2nd gen rt cores. right now with rtx 40 series nvidia is a gen ahead of amd and amd is still playing catch. rdna 4 is where we might get a gpu similar to the performance of 4070ti super both in rasterization and rt performance considering it would have 3rd gen rt cores same as rtx 40 series.
rtx 4070 ti super is a good video card, but if it cost $600
It's good regardless. The 3090 was $1400.
@AssettoCorsaReshades Yes it does. People were talking about the value. The 4070 TI super is more powerful than the 3090 which cost $1,400.
6950 xt 1200$ @@GameCookerUSRocks
try 800$
6950 XT vs. 7900 GRE, please!
they are almost identical in performance
@@FalconPC228 I know; that's why I want to see which one can win by the slightest of margins.
@@selohcin rx 6950 is a litle bit better
What cpu cooler are you using bro
RX 6950XT is awesome and AMD is doing pretty well now with their GPU's. Just make sure you update to the latest AMD graphics drivers. There are always fixes and improvements with every update. I can see AMD in the next 1 or 2 years overtaking Nvidia in the world market. Good Job!
The ti super here its 900+ i saw a 6950xt open box for a 400usd its a no brainer i mostly play shooters online
RTX 3090 Ti vs RX 7900 XTX 👍
nvidia cards run better in ray tracing than raster in cyberpunk ....
RX 6950XT VS RX 7900GRE ???
6950XT Powerhouse.
so 4070 ti super is slightly better but $200-300 for 10+ fps more so no.
exactly 😂
Hello,👋 I’ve been watching your videos on UA-cam 😁for a long time and am one of your subscribers. It’s interesting to see how your channel develops. I have a few questions: Do you mainly prefer to buy game keys or do you use any game subscription services, such as Xbox Game Pass?🧐 I’m also curious about which software you use to edit your videos, if it’s not a secret. What is the name of the program you use to display your PC specs? And one more question: how much time does it take for you to shoot, edit, and publish a video? I would be grateful if you could answer.🙏
You can use msi afterburner,to display these specs on the screen, (specifically the rivatuner part of it) and they probably edit with something like Adobe After Effects to do basic cuts and show visual graphs etc.
Is this guy playing in 1440p monitor?
I'd like to see a test with the RX 6950 XT and the RTX 4070 Super
just look at 7900 GRE vs 4070 Super and there you go
@@Defineddnot the same
They will be nearly identical I think in regular rastorisation.
They're around the same price in most countries. So realistically 4070 ti super wins "no diff" . 👌
Consumo de energia maior na AMD, mas desempenho em fps pelo preço que custa muito bom tbm.
P tu compensar a diferença de 250 dólares em energia você precisaria facilmente de mais de 6 anos jogando igual um doente umas 60 horas por semana, se você for assumir o melhor cenário p Nvidia em que a placa da AMD consome 350 e a 70 consome 250 dá 6kW semanais e 256 kW por ano (42 semanas) e uns 290kW com a fonte a uns 88% de eficiência, o preço médio do kW nos EUA sai por $0,17, o que dá 49,3 dólares por ano, ou seja, mais de 5 anos p tirar a diferença mesmo em um cenário extremo e irrealista, sem falar da possubilidade de undervolt
gpu company need to focus on comsume less power and deliver high fps because of high demand in A.I and Graphic Technology in future.
the 6950xt is last gen, and was much more power efficient than the 3090ti it competed with at the time
An Rx 6950xt is $885 in my country while an rtx 4070ti super is $900. Which is better?
Depending on your budget you can look for a 7900xt or GRE Aswell
Obviously 4070ti Super
@@enamulhaquejoy6962 if the 7900 GRE or xt are around that price they are better performance if u don't use ray traycing
Newer is always better to get
@@GameCookerUSRocks thats not always the case.
What’s the best pc build for $1300?
5700x3d/5800x3d, 16gb dual rank 3600 lowish latency DD R4, cheapest pcie3 M2 SSD that has some dram cache, cheapest motherboard that supports pho, and then put the rest into a GPU... Nvidia push Ray tracing down your throat but unless you're spending £1200+ on the GPU alone, then RT is a waste of time honestly... However IMO dlss is superior to far, so it's still worth going with a midrange Nvidia GPU, if you're even slightly an Nvidia fanboy... A second hand 3080-12g is cheap AF and performs well at upto 1440p, gives okay 1080p RT performance & supports dlss...
AMD alternative would be 6800xt or better or 7800xt or better... They only support fsr upscaling as opposed to Nvidia which supports fsr and dlss... The 6800xt categorically is uselessly bad at RT, and whilst the 7800xt is significantly better it's still novelty factor rather than daily gaming option.... The 6800xt is a touch faster than the 3080 in rasterisation, but with the slightly better dlss, many games draw even again
i would not go with am4 build. go am5 7600x its equivalent to 5800x3d then you can always upgrade down the path.
@@aaronjones4529 dont recommend am4 anymore. its the dead platform now.
@@Ehren1337 fair comment on the future upgradability especially with AMD 9000 soon to be released... In which case 6000mts low latency ddr5 for the ram, which doesn't need to be expensive these days, either 👍
rtx 3080 ti vs rtx 4070 dlss3
4070 ti super is the new 2070 super
6950 xt for 500 bucks is not a bad option
just found mines for 380$ on fb marketplace the red devil variant too!!!
550$ vs 800$ 🤓
$200 more for 10 more fps. Terrific value!
It took Nvidia 2 generations to beat AMD mid range GPUs, AMD still doesn't have a high end GPU
Your comment makes no sense.
We are in 2024, is time to change games of 2018. Need this
The first descendant
Steel nomad
Hellblade 2
Bodycam
Avatar FoP
Dragon's Dogma 2
XDefiant
Oucast - a new beginning
Banishers
And all need RT tests where available
Nvidia has put the pedal to the metal and leaving AMD behind. Reports show next Gen AMD Graphics cards will not be any faster than current gen while RTX 5000 will show a 20-30% bump in performance. No pricing has been leaked but if it is say as current pricing structure there will be zero reason to consider AMD Graphic Cards..
Alright dont forget to pay them alot of money
this is such a stupid comment, the only reason people consider buying amd cards is because they're so much cheaper than nvidia while always giving more performance, look at the rtx 3050 and rx 6600,or the 4060 and 6700xt,or the 7700xt and 4060ti, or the 4070s and 7900gre
you sound like userbenchmark lol 🤣
Nvidia currently at 83% market share, AMD needs to figure something out as hardly anyone is buying their GPUs.
Estás mal , AMD no hará GPUs gama alta en la serie RX 8000 , pero hará gama baja y media siendo la más potente una con rendimiento superior a una RX 7900 xt y costando 400-600$
Y Nvidia ganó mercado por qué se toma en cuenta las GPU compradas para IA , si contamos solo las GPU para gaming el número sería mejor para AMD
Top monitor 2k msi ?
360 oled 27’
all these video is 1440p and by allocated VRAM usage ( graphic quality) the 6950XT still beat the 4070ti S. the 4070ti S look more blurry to generated more FPS and is pretty obvious on 32" 1440p LG Utlragears monitors. on 4K resolution the 6950XT still easy beat the 4070ti super
The colour quality with nvidia is insane compared
Why pay MORE? If we get more than 60 fps 1440 with ultra settings.
Rx 6950 XT is good.
60 fps is not enough you need more fps and you probally gonna use ray tracing with this high-end graphic cards also fsr can't match with dlss power consumption is too lower on 4070 ti super finally if you're making videos or live Nvidia has some features for content creaters this are the reasons for buying 4070 ti super
@@GodSlayerJoker 60 is plenty, especially for non-competitive games
@@GodSlayerJokerel RT no vale la pena , el dlss y fsr están más parejos de lo que tu crees , lo que pasa es que la gente compra dlss 3.7 con fsr2 y así es obvio cual será mejor , es como comparar dlss1 vs fsr 2.2
@@gordonfreeman5958 it is not.
@@traelkel8789 speak English you villager or leave the comments.
Please test more 6950xt! Great video
Consumes 60 Watt more
5% slower overall
But 200$ cheaper
5% slower?? on this 10 game average is 13.5% slower not including ray tracing..
@@chimichanga295 yup 5 % up to 12%
What are you smoke? Its 370watts 6950xt. Its only chip draw power. Not vram. And other components draw about 50watts more.
It's also last gen, and mostly out of stock so you cant find it regularly anymore. A 7900XT is around 680$ and still 120$ cheaper, but is faster in raster
@@ryankhelil1512 its not 5% to 13.5% its literally 13.5% for these 10 games ,what are u smoking man? sometimes rtx 4070ti s is better 25% in new games. Learn your math
6950XT was 80% less fps than 4070TIS with RTX, and I saw the record about 4070TIS vs 7900XT, the fps difference was as same as in 4K.
It seems to there is no different between RDNA2 and RDNA3 when RTX on !?
I hope amd wins so I can buy Nvidia
AMD always using high power.
Aren't you tired of filming the same thing over and over again?
its their source of income why would anyone tired of their own profession if its giving good money?
@@PCBenchmarkingHub You think he gets paid enough monthly to sustain himself solely on youtube? Im really curious because for the past month theres only one video over 30k views
This channel is ran by a pc store so the income comes from people buying pc parts
@@Rechinu1 the dude has +500mil subs, with a couple dozen videos that have +1mil views. He probably makes enough off this channel to buy whatever hardware he wants.
I arrived first!
I arrived first!