It's really disturbing how many people think Terrence Howard is a genius. I keep pointing out that the Lynchpin drone is a fun novelty but very impractical. I get all sorts of replies about how I would dismiss the Wright Brothers if I saw their airplane. It's not surprising that the only people impressed by Terrence Howard are the scientifically illiterate.
Actually multiple people won the lynchpin contest, Terrence claimed he was giving all the entrance 25k but, not sure how it actually played out after he made that claim though. The video where he picked the winners was hilarious seeing all their faces as he offered them jobs mining astroids and building drone swarms for the military lol dude is off his rocker also he hit his wife and is generally a super egotistical terrible person. I will say that Bardwell live stream with him was one of the funniest ever though.
What we need is better flight performance a set of presets i also find that crossfire on inav does not have great range not sure why but betaflight and kiss are giving better range for tbs crossfire im really hoping inav will fix all theses things if so Inav would be the only software to use on drones.
What in the hell are you blathering about? It's open source software, you just make if it isn't that hard??? I mean it literally there's cmake and make instructions on the site if it's so simple build it yourself (is what I'm doing to test out some sensors and whatnot but saying it's easy someone else should do it for you is childish if not idiotic, I hope for your sake it's the former, but I have my doubts)
@@ShaunHusain because your English is poor, I do not understand your response. However I have a general assumption of your intentions, and so my response is why talk about a thing, that so easily can be made and therefore demonstrated, it’s a lazy methodology of this discussion it added only opinion, I trust this man’s obvious ability as demonstrated in inav, now verify, simple.
@AdamWeatherall which part of my English are you having trouble understanding? Do you know what cmake is? Are you talking about the tangential flight thing? If so there's no need to build one if you understand physics and dead weight.
@@ShaunHusain it took me far less time to actually construct than it did for this man to shoot edit and upload this video. Multiple working units exist, really they just needed proper tuning, I’m sure your aware in the leaps in fc technology in the last years , they were using f3 when they first were produced in 2016. It’s not a game changer , but based upon its original design date it certainly shows at least the creativity of the originator. Its limitations are battery power, there are some unique findings you come across when you actually have one hovering. Besides, this is not how hypothesis works, speculation is a game for fools not those that posses the scientific mind, he should not feel so satisfied with this video. If you re-read your original sentence and don’t find flaws, then yes your English is poor, but regardless I hope you have a good day.
It's really disturbing how many people think Terrence Howard is a genius.
I keep pointing out that the Lynchpin drone is a fun novelty but very impractical. I get all sorts of replies about how I would dismiss the Wright Brothers if I saw their airplane.
It's not surprising that the only people impressed by Terrence Howard are the scientifically illiterate.
Actually multiple people won the lynchpin contest, Terrence claimed he was giving all the entrance 25k but, not sure how it actually played out after he made that claim though. The video where he picked the winners was hilarious seeing all their faces as he offered them jobs mining astroids and building drone swarms for the military lol dude is off his rocker also he hit his wife and is generally a super egotistical terrible person.
I will say that Bardwell live stream with him was one of the funniest ever though.
What we need is better flight performance a set of presets i also find that crossfire on inav does not have great range not sure why but betaflight and kiss are giving better range for tbs crossfire im really hoping inav will fix all theses things if so Inav would be the only software to use on drones.
Thanks for the video 👍😊with a professional input.
Terrance Howard brain would make yours look like an acorn in comparisom!
It's easier to fool a man than to convince a man he's been fooled.
The wizard sounds great but kiss is much easier just no good gps functions
Wizard… yammy..🎉
Jealousy
I built one , it’s doesn’t behave as you state, just make it instead of talking, it isn’t that hard.
What in the hell are you blathering about? It's open source software, you just make if it isn't that hard??? I mean it literally there's cmake and make instructions on the site if it's so simple build it yourself (is what I'm doing to test out some sensors and whatnot but saying it's easy someone else should do it for you is childish if not idiotic, I hope for your sake it's the former, but I have my doubts)
@@ShaunHusain because your English is poor, I do not understand your response. However I have a general assumption of your intentions, and so my response is why talk about a thing, that so easily can be made and therefore demonstrated, it’s a lazy methodology of this discussion it added only opinion, I trust this man’s obvious ability as demonstrated in inav, now verify, simple.
@AdamWeatherall which part of my English are you having trouble understanding? Do you know what cmake is? Are you talking about the tangential flight thing? If so there's no need to build one if you understand physics and dead weight.
@@ShaunHusain it took me far less time to actually construct than it did for this man to shoot edit and upload this video. Multiple working units exist, really they just needed proper tuning, I’m sure your aware in the leaps in fc technology in the last years , they were using f3 when they first were produced in 2016. It’s not a game changer , but based upon its original design date it certainly shows at least the creativity of the originator. Its limitations are battery power, there are some unique findings you come across when you actually have one hovering. Besides, this is not how hypothesis works, speculation is a game for fools not those that posses the scientific mind, he should not feel so satisfied with this video. If you re-read your original sentence and don’t find flaws, then yes your English is poor, but regardless I hope you have a good day.
Why does he need to make one, what will it provide? It's like those toy rc cars with wheels on every side a novelty with not much real world use.
Why not just build one instead of just talking.