Round of applause to Corrin, they get thrown off every single Smash Roster you’ll ever see, yet manages to dodge every single bullet that’s been fired at previous cuts. Well done Nohrian Royal, never thought you’d outlive Luigi or Mewtwo.
Since Sakurai has been tinkering with Luigi and Ganondorf's moves, meaning he wants them to shed their status as clones, so I don't think they will be deleted because of this.
The fact that Corrin follows every single piece of criteria better than Luigi or Sonic is crazy to me. Also I still don't understand why people thought Lucario was a semiclone of Mewtwo just cause he made it to Brawl but Mewtwo didn't. They share 1 (if we wanna stretch with Fsmash, 2) move(s). I could make the argument that Incineroar is a semiclone of K.Rool because they have super similar Nairs and Down Smashes but I'd look like an idiot, now wouldn't I.
This was really good! Obviously characters like Luigi, Ganondorf, Sonic, etc. wouldn't get cut, but most people who make these types of videos tend to just get rid of every fire emblem character because "Fire emblem bad" or keep obviously irrelevant characters so it was nice to someone look at it based on how they've cut characters before.
I'd argue along with Sonic and Mega Man Terry could also stay. As Sakurai said SNK was extremely easy to work with. He went in for like 30 songs and came back with 50 and a bunch of background characters. SNK is like the Grandma you visit and leave fat even though you weren't that hungry.
I’m also gonna vouch for Ryu and Bayonetta, since Ryu is legally obligated to crossover with everything imaginable and Bayo is pretty much a Nintendo IP at this point.
As an add-on regarding the Kongs, Yoshi, and Wario- they all host their own distinct subseries. Wario with Warioware (and Land), the Kongs with DK Country, and Yoshi with, well, Yoshi.
In Sakurai's Famitsu Column volume 496 (discussing the DLC for Smash 4), Sakurai says "I personally felt that having too many Fire Emblem characters was a problem, but after talking it over with the development staff and discussing logistics, I felt certain that I could make them a fun character." Key thing is "too many Fire Emblem characters". So Corrin should be cut in regards to the "low priority" bracket.
The best part about this roster is that you can add back in Luigi, Ganondorf, Sonic and Mega Man, and it still fills up a nice and even chart. (Pac-Man maybe as well, considering Bandai Namco helps make Smash, and then the random character slot can just go off to the side or something.)
First video like this I've seen that's actually based on logic and not "Who do *I* want to get cut" But fuck you for saying the Miis should get cut Miis are awesome
Ness should be cut too. He like Jigglypuff was considered to be cut in both Melee and Brawl to be replaced with Lucas and the Mother series has been finished for nearly 18 years.
When it comes to 3rd party representation, I think there's one third party character I'd put higher... Pac-man. *If* the next game is developed by Bandai Namco again, then Pac-man is almost third party and that might be a huge boon
In fact Namco not have any more privileges than other 3rd parties, or even less than others.They removed the Pac-Maze but kept two stages of Sonic in Ultimate.
With the no future rule with the representative aspect, I would probably loosely define it as if they represent something beyond their franchises or that their franchises have a huge impact on gaming culture and all that they would probably not get cut from the roster. So characters like Game and Watch and ROB would probably be safer from being cut in general. Though they could get cut and become assist trophies probably.
I appreciate you keeping Ness despite the “dormant series” category because at the moment, Mother, unlike Starfox, F-Zero, and Punch Out which I can very well see make a return eventually, is actually dead and the creator of the series has outright confirmed there won’t be a Mother 4
If Sakurai has any say on the matter- Ganondorf Is never getting cut, that's his main. (...so by that logic, Captain Falcon is more likely then Ganondorf if we can't have "double"/echos)
you make back with the old the concept who never back again its the fact of super smash bros 64 and melee focus in only nintendo characters no third party characters
Donkey Kong has borderline been in every Mario Sports/Kart game since the Country reboot, along with playing a part of every single Mario Party despite not being playable in 5-9. Diddy has also been a frequent recurring in those games too, granted not on the levels of DK, but still enough that he’s recognised as a member of Mario's cast. K Rool has only appeared in Mario Sluggers, a sports game that didn’t even get a PAL release, so he’s not got that recognition as being apart of the Mario cast. DK and Diddy have enough that people notice when the latter is not in a Mario game the former is, I’d say that classifies them enough to be Mario characters. Plus Donkey Kong is literally the starter for the entire Mario franchise, and has had multiple Versus games where it’s a fact they’re the same universe.
I don’t 😅. I expect about 15 or 20 characters to get cut at most. Most smash games get close to that many characters cut. But nonetheless if possible I would like just to port smash ultimate and add more content and dlc on top of it even if it might be difficult. We are so close to a 100 characters in smash ultimate already that it be a shame to cut to many in the next smash and never reach a 100.
@@Wallie33. Sakurai already said a roster of this magnitude could likely never happen again, and I feel it would soften the blow if a massive roster cut happened as opposed to a few
@@pengoschwortz4734 Yeah he did say that. Tho Sakurai changes his mind sometimes or the development cycle changes. So anyway will see. I do expect some cuts but we can’t be for sure until we see the announcement of the next game.
Cutting the roster in half means you get 45 fighters for the next game, this would be my ideal roster for the next game, 1 Mario 2 Luigi 3 Peach 4 Bowser 5 Rosalina & Luma 6 Donkey Kong 7 King K. Rool 8 Link 9 Zelda 10 Ganondorf 11 Samus 12 Ridley 13 Yoshi 14 Kirby 15 King Dedede 16 Fox 17 Wolf 18 Pikachu 19 Mewtwo 20 Lucario 21 Greninja 22 Incineroar 23 Ness 24 Captain Falcon 25 Ice Climbers 26 Marth 27 Ike 28 Robin 29 Byleth 30 Mr game & watch 31 Pit 32 Palutena 33 Wario 34 Olimar 35 R.O.B. 36 Villager 37 Wii fit trainer 38 Little Mac 39 Shulk 40 Duck Hunt 41 Inkling 42 Min Min 43 Snake 44 Sonic 45 Mega Man ? Mii brawler ? Mii swordfighter ? Mii Gunner
I feel like that answer is obviously yes, smash was and is a celebration of Nintendo, always has and always will, however the room to welcome other icons of gaming has grown and people enjoy it, but smash would definitely survive no 3rd party characters.
@@paulinetrivago.7540smash was never a first party series or at least not fully Pokemon is owned by Nintendo game freak and creatures Inc fire emblem is co-owned by Nintendo and intelligent systems ignorant people like you who waste their time not making any logical sense it was only represented as "duke it out as your favorite Nintendo characters" which made it seem like Justin Nintendo crossover and Fanboys should accept that also bayonetta's games are published buy Nintendo's ownership despite not being owned by Nintendo
@colapop0318 you definitely have a lot of feelings about this, maybe you should try and heal whatever is making you irrationally angry about me stating an opinion about what I think we all know what was true about the series. It was and is a celebration of Nintendo history, which is extremely prevalent during 64 and Melee. From Brawl onwards, smash opened of the doors to become a celebration of gaming history in general, with a strong emphasis on Nintendo because first and foremost, it's a Nintendo product, celebrating Nintendo and gaming
@@paulinetrivago.7540 I'm not angry I'm just explaining also sakurai includes third parties because he likes the fact that he can talk in meet other creators I was just talking about how it wasn't a first party series to begin with since Pokemon is an odd man out I was just talking about how it wasn't first party since you said it was a celebration of Nintendo considering it wasn't fully a celebration of Nintendo
@@paulinetrivago.7540 saying it represents Nintendo history when it doesn't fully represent the company I agree with you on some levels but I think that it's too much to just randomly cut I agree with you on some levels but I think that it's too much to just randomly cut third parties not trying to start an argument but it's not like I intentionally mean to start an argument I'm just explaining
Round of applause to Corrin, they get thrown off every single Smash Roster you’ll ever see, yet manages to dodge every single bullet that’s been fired at previous cuts. Well done Nohrian Royal, never thought you’d outlive Luigi or Mewtwo.
Since Sakurai has been tinkering with Luigi and Ganondorf's moves, meaning he wants them to shed their status as clones, so I don't think they will be deleted because of this.
captain falcon the luckiest man alive rn
The fact that Corrin follows every single piece of criteria better than Luigi or Sonic is crazy to me. Also I still don't understand why people thought Lucario was a semiclone of Mewtwo just cause he made it to Brawl but Mewtwo didn't. They share 1 (if we wanna stretch with Fsmash, 2) move(s). I could make the argument that Incineroar is a semiclone of K.Rool because they have super similar Nairs and Down Smashes but I'd look like an idiot, now wouldn't I.
This was really good! Obviously characters like Luigi, Ganondorf, Sonic, etc. wouldn't get cut, but most people who make these types of videos tend to just get rid of every fire emblem character because "Fire emblem bad" or keep obviously irrelevant characters so it was nice to someone look at it based on how they've cut characters before.
Luigi not being in smash would be pretty funny considering the series is named after him. It's called super smash BROTHERS after all
The idea that Luigi just represents the term "Bros" is very funny to me.
@@castform7i mean what else does bros signify?
I'd be oddly okay if this was the roster of returning characters in the next game
I'd argue along with Sonic and Mega Man Terry could also stay. As Sakurai said SNK was extremely easy to work with. He went in for like 30 songs and came back with 50 and a bunch of background characters. SNK is like the Grandma you visit and leave fat even though you weren't that hungry.
also pac man and kazuya, since bandai namco literally make the smash games alongside Sakurai's team
I’m also gonna vouch for Ryu and Bayonetta, since Ryu is legally obligated to crossover with everything imaginable and Bayo is pretty much a Nintendo IP at this point.
@PipS03 But they removed Pac-Maze in Ultimate, and Namco is the old third party with the fewest characters and stages.
This is probably my favorite video about hypothetical roster cuts.
It feels the most unbiased using previous logic to devise it.
If I see a Corrin in this roster I sware to god
😮
This roster made me happy because Corrin was on it! Corrin should stay!
@@master106 Agreed! He's one of the most fun characters to play as, in my opinion.
As an add-on regarding the Kongs, Yoshi, and Wario- they all host their own distinct subseries.
Wario with Warioware (and Land), the Kongs with DK Country, and Yoshi with, well, Yoshi.
Greater Cave, Twice as Offensive
In Sakurai's Famitsu Column volume 496 (discussing the DLC for Smash 4), Sakurai says "I personally felt that having too many Fire Emblem characters was a problem, but after talking it over with the development staff and discussing logistics, I felt certain that I could make them a fun character."
Key thing is "too many Fire Emblem characters". So Corrin should be cut in regards to the "low priority" bracket.
The best part about this roster is that you can add back in Luigi, Ganondorf, Sonic and Mega Man, and it still fills up a nice and even chart. (Pac-Man maybe as well, considering Bandai Namco helps make Smash, and then the random character slot can just go off to the side or something.)
First video like this I've seen that's actually based on logic and not "Who do *I* want to get cut"
But fuck you for saying the Miis should get cut Miis are awesome
This guy has a fucking Makoto corner I love him
Ness should be cut too. He like Jigglypuff was considered to be cut in both Melee and Brawl to be replaced with Lucas and the Mother series has been finished for nearly 18 years.
When it comes to 3rd party representation, I think there's one third party character I'd put higher... Pac-man. *If* the next game is developed by Bandai Namco again, then Pac-man is almost third party and that might be a huge boon
i think pac man is more nintendo character than namco character becuse namco and nintendo a good friends
In fact Namco not have any more privileges than other 3rd parties, or even less than others.They removed the Pac-Maze but kept two stages of Sonic in Ultimate.
Very fun and interesting video
With the no future rule with the representative aspect, I would probably loosely define it as if they represent something beyond their franchises or that their franchises have a huge impact on gaming culture and all that they would probably not get cut from the roster. So characters like Game and Watch and ROB would probably be safer from being cut in general. Though they could get cut and become assist trophies probably.
Fire Emblem can't keep getting away with this
Love the Makoto figure.
I appreciate you keeping Ness despite the “dormant series” category because at the moment, Mother, unlike Starfox, F-Zero, and Punch Out which I can very well see make a return eventually, is actually dead and the creator of the series has outright confirmed there won’t be a Mother 4
There is way too many FE charcaters, at this point Corrin being cut is just a fact
If Sakurai has any say on the matter- Ganondorf Is never getting cut, that's his main.
(...so by that logic, Captain Falcon is more likely then Ganondorf if we can't have "double"/echos)
Love this video! Glad I found your content!
Truthfully i am more interested in if certain STAGES get cut. Like imagine if they dropped a lot of the best stages
Certified Alph enjoyer
you make back with the old the concept who never back again its the fact of super smash bros 64 and melee focus in only nintendo characters no third party characters
You remind me of Mike Wegman from the Simpsons.
I'd disagree with Game & Watch, as the character routinely makes cameos and is a mascot character, appearing in Mario Odyssey.
mr game and watch is a character who represent the all nintendo history of hand consols
I am going to argue that if Smash for 3DS can't have Zelda/Sheik transformations, then Pythra should be removed for the same reason.
Screw Corrin! Otherwise, good unbiased video.
YOU CUT MARIO????
Donkey kong characters are not apart of Mario characters. Mario movie made everyone stupid. And the roster is terrible.
Donkey Kong has borderline been in every Mario Sports/Kart game since the Country reboot, along with playing a part of every single Mario Party despite not being playable in 5-9. Diddy has also been a frequent recurring in those games too, granted not on the levels of DK, but still enough that he’s recognised as a member of Mario's cast. K Rool has only appeared in Mario Sluggers, a sports game that didn’t even get a PAL release, so he’s not got that recognition as being apart of the Mario cast.
DK and Diddy have enough that people notice when the latter is not in a Mario game the former is, I’d say that classifies them enough to be Mario characters. Plus Donkey Kong is literally the starter for the entire Mario franchise, and has had multiple Versus games where it’s a fact they’re the same universe.
You didn't congrat splatoon for their game award
self-depricating humor is awful and unhealthy asf
womp womp
I truly hope there’s a massive roster cut going into the next smash game
Shut up
I don’t 😅. I expect about 15 or 20 characters to get cut at most. Most smash games get close to that many characters cut. But nonetheless if possible I would like just to port smash ultimate and add more content and dlc on top of it even if it might be difficult. We are so close to a 100 characters in smash ultimate already that it be a shame to cut to many in the next smash and never reach a 100.
@@Wallie33. Sakurai already said a roster of this magnitude could likely never happen again, and I feel it would soften the blow if a massive roster cut happened as opposed to a few
@@pengoschwortz4734 Yeah he did say that. Tho Sakurai changes his mind sometimes or the development cycle changes. So anyway will see. I do expect some cuts but we can’t be for sure until we see the announcement of the next game.
@@Wallie33. but this isn’t a thing he can change his mind on. The biggest challenge appeared to be 3rd parties
I can't believe Yoshi made it through. I was so ready to cut Yoshi out
Lost all credibility at 7:07 bad video do not watch 👎
P r o m o s m 👍
Cutting the roster in half means you get 45 fighters for the next game, this would be my ideal roster for the next game,
1 Mario
2 Luigi
3 Peach
4 Bowser
5 Rosalina & Luma
6 Donkey Kong
7 King K. Rool
8 Link
9 Zelda
10 Ganondorf
11 Samus
12 Ridley
13 Yoshi
14 Kirby
15 King Dedede
16 Fox
17 Wolf
18 Pikachu
19 Mewtwo
20 Lucario
21 Greninja
22 Incineroar
23 Ness
24 Captain Falcon
25 Ice Climbers
26 Marth
27 Ike
28 Robin
29 Byleth
30 Mr game & watch
31 Pit
32 Palutena
33 Wario
34 Olimar
35 R.O.B.
36 Villager
37 Wii fit trainer
38 Little Mac
39 Shulk
40 Duck Hunt
41 Inkling
42 Min Min
43 Snake
44 Sonic
45 Mega Man
? Mii brawler
? Mii swordfighter
? Mii Gunner
man i love bloons td oops wrong video
6:58 who is "he"
7:18 im going to be sick
why do you so foolishly hate miis
11:52 eww 2 fire types no grass types...
Why u tryna “expose” this guy bud
Snake wasn't cut because he's third party, this logic isn't logical.
Would Smash Bros. even be Smash Bros. anymore without the third parties?
I feel like that answer is obviously yes, smash was and is a celebration of Nintendo, always has and always will, however the room to welcome other icons of gaming has grown and people enjoy it, but smash would definitely survive no 3rd party characters.
@@paulinetrivago.7540smash was never a first party series or at least not fully Pokemon is owned by Nintendo game freak and creatures Inc fire emblem is co-owned by Nintendo and intelligent systems ignorant people like you who waste their time not making any logical sense it was only represented as "duke it out as your favorite Nintendo characters" which made it seem like Justin Nintendo crossover and Fanboys should accept that also bayonetta's games are published buy Nintendo's ownership despite not being owned by Nintendo
@colapop0318 you definitely have a lot of feelings about this, maybe you should try and heal whatever is making you irrationally angry about me stating an opinion about what I think we all know what was true about the series. It was and is a celebration of Nintendo history, which is extremely prevalent during 64 and Melee. From Brawl onwards, smash opened of the doors to become a celebration of gaming history in general, with a strong emphasis on Nintendo because first and foremost, it's a Nintendo product, celebrating Nintendo and gaming
@@paulinetrivago.7540 I'm not angry I'm just explaining also sakurai includes third parties because he likes the fact that he can talk in meet other creators I was just talking about how it wasn't a first party series to begin with since Pokemon is an odd man out I was just talking about how it wasn't first party since you said it was a celebration of Nintendo considering it wasn't fully a celebration of Nintendo
@@paulinetrivago.7540 saying it represents Nintendo history when it doesn't fully represent the company I agree with you on some levels but I think that it's too much to just randomly cut I agree with you on some levels but I think that it's too much to just randomly cut third parties not trying to start an argument but it's not like I intentionally mean to start an argument I'm just explaining