Your channel is awesome man! Found you through the 1440p version of this video. May be a silly question but what are your thoughts on cpu scaling with ultrawide gaming?
I commented on your other video about cpu performance. I have a 13700k /RTX 4080 on ultawide. For F1 23 default benchmark Bahrain I get 92 vs your 83. Not sure what other games you use an in game benchmark tool but I think it's safe to say your 5800x3d is holding back more than just the 4090.
In this game it does seem from what i can tell by comparing to some 1080p results I found that the higher cpu overhead on the nvidia side does mean the 4090 and 4080 are some what hampered by my 5800X3D vs a 700X3D but the radion 7900 cards are not affected, and produce the same results as the 7800X3D.
@@ultrawidetechchannel I'm sure that's not the only one but maybe you should wait for the 9800x3d to roll out and upgrade your setup. That would be a massive boost I'm sure.
I don't think you will need to upgrade until most AAA games are starting to use path tracing.or until you upgrade to a 5k2k ultrawide when the 240hz OLED ones arrive.
@@allxtend4005 This thing runs games at 4K without issue. What you’re talking about out is running games on dumb settings like Ultra (that are NOT optimized) and then laughing when a card gets crippled by it. All while in a discussion on how 3440x1440 is significantly better to run than 4K.
Amazing as always!! I have some questions. I have an RX 7900 XT, and I'm planning to buy the LG 34WP65C-B. Can the performance improve? I've noticed you said that the gpu was bottlenecked by the AMD driver, how is that possible? Can that improve in the future? Thanks!!
The 7900XT is not going to really run into any bottlenecks at 3440x1440, like it does at 1080p. A driver bottleneck like what is seen at 1080p in Payday 3 is basically a CPU bottleneck because the driver does a poor job leveraging what the CPU offers. This can improve with patches and driver updates. Those cards are already at 210fps and are not bottlenecked at higher resolutions so not sure how much attention that specific case would get. I have a video coming out soon showing the performance possible by 7900XT at different ultrawide resolutions when leveraging both FSR and AMD Fluid Motion Frames so keep an eye out for that.
@@ultrawidetechchannel Ohh I see, thanks for taking the time to answer this. I have an r7 5700x. I know that this CPU isn't really fast enough to use with my GPU but maybe in a couple of years I'll upgrade it. Thanks again and I'll be waiting for that video!!
I want it to be but I'm just not willing to give up the UA-cam features that ar restricted for anyone going beyond a 2:1 aspect ratio. It makes no sense why they are restricted but sadly they are.
@@Shockload yes, almost all my videos are uploaded in the 18:9/2:1 aspect ratio to get as much width as i can while still staying in UA-cam guidelines.
I mostly play CS2 in the evening with friends but mostly single player titles/mmorpgs when I'm by my self to chill out. I have a 6700xt + ryzen 7 5800x3d. Not looking to upgrade soon. On 1080p 240hz everything is just smooth as butter and fast. Looking into buying a 3440x1440 LG 240hz OLED monitor. I was just not sure if I can push games on it with no issues. I have no interest in RT. Most of the times I don't even care about graphics. I can play on low / medium if I'm getting better smoothness. What would you think, will it be able to run anything without any issues ? Is there any website to test values ?
Depends on the game but with competitive settings (max view distance + medium/low settings) that seems quite reasonable. the 7900XT is getting 170+ with max settings no upscaling in Rainbow 6 Extraction so if your turned that down a little you could easily get the GRE over 180, R6 Seige was in the 400s max settings, and you should be able to hit your target in fortnite on like medium settings.
Big no, but you will see some increase in performance. I have only run in to a few titles that are actually hitting a CPU wall. Others may be losing the top outlier frames, but that's not something you're going to feel in normal gameplay.
Hardware Unboxed has a video uploaded *exactly one year ago* comparing 5800x3D vs 7800x3D, they saw an average 12% at 1440p in 16:9. But the range was all the way from 40% to 2% heavily depending on the game. Based on that, then maybe you can expect 15% on average at UW 1440p with the 9800x3D, but this is purely speculation. I'm in the same position, I decided to skip 7000 series so I'm getting a 9000x3D for sure. Example, I decided to hold off playing Hogwarts Legacy and Dragons Dogma 2 since those hit the CPU hard even at 1440p
hello! i am using ultrawidify on my 3440x1440p 34gp83a, how do i make 1080p videos to look crisp like on my 24inches 1080p display or my FHD+ display on my phone? Not every 1080p video looks goog while using ultrawidify.
Your channel is awesome man! Found you through the 1440p version of this video. May be a silly question but what are your thoughts on cpu scaling with ultrawide gaming?
Thanks, Unless you have an RTX 4090 your CPU is unlikely to be an issue at 3440x1440, as long as it is reasonably modern.
I commented on your other video about cpu performance. I have a 13700k /RTX 4080 on ultawide. For F1 23 default benchmark Bahrain I get 92 vs your 83. Not sure what other games you use an in game benchmark tool but I think it's safe to say your 5800x3d is holding back more than just the 4090.
In this game it does seem from what i can tell by comparing to some 1080p results I found that the higher cpu overhead on the nvidia side does mean the 4090 and 4080 are some what hampered by my 5800X3D vs a 700X3D but the radion 7900 cards are not affected, and produce the same results as the 7800X3D.
@@ultrawidetechchannel I'm sure that's not the only one but maybe you should wait for the 9800x3d to roll out and upgrade your setup. That would be a massive boost I'm sure.
Great video with much valuable info. Wish your channel to grow fast🤝
Thank you
This is exactly what I was looking for, sounds like my 4070 will do most games fine :D
My 4090 feels really safe at 3440x1440 for years to come
I don't think you will need to upgrade until most AAA games are starting to use path tracing.or until you upgrade to a 5k2k ultrawide when the 240hz OLED ones arrive.
Years to come ? In two years you can forget IT for 4k even nowdays this Card can Not Display 4k 60 FPS native 😂 such a waste
@@allxtend4005 This thing runs games at 4K without issue. What you’re talking about out is running games on dumb settings like Ultra (that are NOT optimized) and then laughing when a card gets crippled by it.
All while in a discussion on how 3440x1440 is significantly better to run than 4K.
Amazing as always!!
I have some questions. I have an RX 7900 XT, and I'm planning to buy the LG 34WP65C-B. Can the performance improve? I've noticed you said that the gpu was bottlenecked by the AMD driver, how is that possible? Can that improve in the future?
Thanks!!
The 7900XT is not going to really run into any bottlenecks at 3440x1440, like it does at 1080p. A driver bottleneck like what is seen at 1080p in Payday 3 is basically a CPU bottleneck because the driver does a poor job leveraging what the CPU offers. This can improve with patches and driver updates. Those cards are already at 210fps and are not bottlenecked at higher resolutions so not sure how much attention that specific case would get.
I have a video coming out soon showing the performance possible by 7900XT at different ultrawide resolutions when leveraging both FSR and AMD Fluid Motion Frames so keep an eye out for that.
@@ultrawidetechchannel Ohh I see, thanks for taking the time to answer this. I have an r7 5700x. I know that this CPU isn't really fast enough to use with my GPU but maybe in a couple of years I'll upgrade it.
Thanks again and I'll be waiting for that video!!
nice overview. but whats the first space game before the benchmarks?
Starfield
Your Video format should be Ultrawide since your channel is about ultrawide monitors. It would look better on my ultrawide.
I want it to be but I'm just not willing to give up the UA-cam features that ar restricted for anyone going beyond a 2:1 aspect ratio. It makes no sense why they are restricted but sadly they are.
@@ultrawidetechchannelLTT uploads in a wider resolution than 16:9 since most people watch videos on phones, which haven been 16:9 for a while.
@@Deses LTT, MKBHD and other big tech youtubers have all switched to 18:9 since it's a great compromise between TVs 16:9 and phones' 20:9
@@Shockload yes, almost all my videos are uploaded in the 18:9/2:1 aspect ratio to get as much width as i can while still staying in UA-cam guidelines.
@@Deses yes and this video is also in that slightly wider 18:9 / 2:1 aspect ratio, which is the max youtube supports with endscreens
I mostly play CS2 in the evening with friends but mostly single player titles/mmorpgs when I'm by my self to chill out. I have a 6700xt + ryzen 7 5800x3d. Not looking to upgrade soon. On 1080p 240hz everything is just smooth as butter and fast. Looking into buying a 3440x1440 LG 240hz OLED monitor. I was just not sure if I can push games on it with no issues. I have no interest in RT. Most of the times I don't even care about graphics. I can play on low / medium if I'm getting better smoothness. What would you think, will it be able to run anything without any issues ? Is there any website to test values ?
will a 7900GRE be enough to play competitive games at 180fps fluent on 3440x1440? i could always OC the 7900GRE and tweak game settings
As long as you don't mind turning down settings a little I think it'd be more than enough. And with an OC that card is an absolute beast.
Depends on the game but with competitive settings (max view distance + medium/low settings) that seems quite reasonable. the 7900XT is getting 170+ with max settings no upscaling in Rainbow 6 Extraction so if your turned that down a little you could easily get the GRE over 180, R6 Seige was in the 400s max settings, and you should be able to hit your target in fortnite on like medium settings.
Can you do a analysis on how well 4000 Laptop series can deal with Ultrawide monitors?
I have a 3440x1440 monitor. Will I see a big performance increase going from a 5800X3D to a 9000X3D with a 4090?
Big no, but you will see some increase in performance. I have only run in to a few titles that are actually hitting a CPU wall. Others may be losing the top outlier frames, but that's not something you're going to feel in normal gameplay.
Hardware Unboxed has a video uploaded *exactly one year ago* comparing 5800x3D vs 7800x3D, they saw an average 12% at 1440p in 16:9. But the range was all the way from 40% to 2% heavily depending on the game. Based on that, then maybe you can expect 15% on average at UW 1440p with the 9800x3D, but this is purely speculation.
I'm in the same position, I decided to skip 7000 series so I'm getting a 9000x3D for sure. Example, I decided to hold off playing Hogwarts Legacy and Dragons Dogma 2 since those hit the CPU hard even at 1440p
hello!
i am using ultrawidify on my 3440x1440p 34gp83a, how do i make 1080p videos to look crisp like on my 24inches 1080p display or my FHD+ display on my phone? Not every 1080p video looks goog while using ultrawidify.
Great video
Thanks
say that to my gtx1080
*sits GTX 1080 down for a talk* You can do it little buddy there is no same in Low settings it happens to us all one day.
@@ultrawidetechchannel Hahaha 🤣 but even low settings, most games run like shit 😂
@@markwinther3210 well it may be time to look at the classifieds, for new cards hitting the market with the next gen launch.