thanks for these videos, they have been really informative. you have caused me to get a laod of Linguistics books - Yule, Aitchison, etc. any plans to do more? you outlined a load more topics in your first video - Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Chomsky, etc. - it would be great if you could cover these too. :)
Hi, I watched all the eight videos in this series and thanks a lot for sharing these. These are really helpful for getting a headstart. Also, i will be looking forward for the other videos that you will share in the continuation of the series. Furthermore, i would love to know about the "Structuralists" as the theory on wikipedia is quite confusing. If you have any suggestions regarding that, please share it. Thank you once again. :)
These are really great. 🤓😃🥳 I must admit they are really tough concepts but I'll just have to repeatedly watch to really get it. Learning these concepts is like being a cow repeatedly chewing cud that's been in and out its stomach. Thank you for pre-digesting these concepts for us. 🤠🐮 Anyway, I got two questions for you: 11:58 Why can't the masculine "him" co-index to Juliet? Why is gender restricted here? How would linguists defend this restriction to biological females who prefer to refer to themselves with masculine pronouns? 19:02 "Romeo killed Romeo." You said you can't have phrases like this because the first utterance is already taken? What if you have two people named "Romeo"? How can this be corrected without resolving by adding modifiers like last names, initials, or epithets?
Thanks for the interesting video! I forget if you've already explained the topic of "traces" in this series, but if you have not, maybe you could consider it if you decide to do more in the future. 😃 Also, this explanation could be translated into Esperanto and be the most detailed description of how to use and not use the pronoun "si"! 😃
Maybe you'll find some pleasure to analyse these French sentences : Ce tableau, c'est lui qui l'a peint. Il a peint ce tableau lui même. Il a peint ce tableau. C'est ce tableau qu'il a peint. C'est ce tableau que X a peint.
![Syntax II: Intro to linguistics [Video 6]](/img/n.gif)
I was looking for something to make my linguistics class a bit more exciting, then I found this gem. Thanks a lot.
Best trainer.
thanks for these videos, they have been really informative. you have caused me to get a laod of Linguistics books - Yule, Aitchison, etc.
any plans to do more? you outlined a load more topics in your first video - Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Chomsky, etc. - it would be great if you could cover these too. :)
God bless you Sir. This has helped me a ton! Can't tell you how much this entire video series helped me prepare for my exams
Thanks! Glad to hear my videos are helping people :)
Thanks to this series I can now appreciate those weird sentences in Duolingo.
Thanks! :)
Hi, I watched all the eight videos in this series and thanks a lot for sharing these. These are really helpful for getting a headstart. Also, i will be looking forward for the other videos that you will share in the continuation of the series.
Furthermore, i would love to know about the "Structuralists" as the theory on wikipedia is quite confusing. If you have any suggestions regarding that, please share it. Thank you once again. :)
My Mid Term test going easy with this video.
Thank you so much.
Thanks, these are really useful :-)
Awesome videos! I wondered if you are gonna have a series of videos on Semantics as well? Really looking forward to it!
Thanks for the comment! I plan on making one in the future.
great! looking forward to it!
Thank you for these videos man!
These are really great. 🤓😃🥳 I must admit they are really tough concepts but I'll just have to repeatedly watch to really get it. Learning these concepts is like being a cow repeatedly chewing cud that's been in and out its stomach. Thank you for pre-digesting these concepts for us. 🤠🐮
Anyway, I got two questions for you:
11:58 Why can't the masculine "him" co-index to Juliet? Why is gender restricted here? How would linguists defend this restriction to biological females who prefer to refer to themselves with masculine pronouns?
19:02 "Romeo killed Romeo." You said you can't have phrases like this because the first utterance is already taken? What if you have two people named "Romeo"? How can this be corrected without resolving by adding modifiers like last names, initials, or epithets?
Thank you so much!
Thanks for the interesting video! I forget if you've already explained the topic of "traces" in this series, but if you have not, maybe you could consider it if you decide to do more in the future. 😃
Also, this explanation could be translated into Esperanto and be the most detailed description of how to use and not use the pronoun "si"! 😃
Thanks! I don’t remember everything I said in my previous videos, but I’m pretty sure I covered it in my movement video.
@@FingtamLanguages Cool! Maybe I'll take a look at earlier videos. :-)
C command whut whut whut??????????????? Ok ok, the examples at the end helped, but maybe I ought to watch again.
8:56 i S thAt A jOJo rEfEReNCE?
Maybe you'll find some pleasure to analyse these French sentences : Ce tableau, c'est lui qui l'a peint. Il a peint ce tableau lui même. Il a peint ce tableau. C'est ce tableau qu'il a peint. C'est ce tableau que X a peint.