Does The Walabot Work? Lets Test It Out | THE HANDYMAN |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 311

  • @michaelpeavey3264
    @michaelpeavey3264 5 років тому +33

    I have had one for over a year. Like you, found it very useful on drywall. It has never failed to find a stud, pipe or wire. It is worthless on concrete with gravel or any large aggregate in it, like all foundations. I always wondered if it was just me......I guess not.

    • @douglaspayne5029
      @douglaspayne5029 Рік тому

      what about a 100 year old victorian house with plaster and lathe?

  • @843292
    @843292 5 років тому +54

    Man! I have been wondering about this gadget/app combo for some time. Thanks for doing a real life demonstration!

    • @TheHandyman1
      @TheHandyman1  5 років тому +7

      I have had mixed results with it. It works great on drywall. It works OK on plaster. I didn't have much luck on the concrete.

    • @joepierce5357
      @joepierce5357 5 років тому +1

      Is it only for the android?

    • @mainlinx
      @mainlinx 5 років тому

      @@TheHandyman1 Uses cutting-edge radar technology to see inside drywall & concrete walls (currently doesn't support lath and plasters walls)

    • @robertcueto892
      @robertcueto892 2 роки тому

      Appreciate the demo...passing on the product.

  • @renoguy25
    @renoguy25 5 років тому +120

    I do home renos . and bought one a few months ago ... I find the one thing that it did very well was to separate me from my money, everything else ... not so much
    Bob from Calgary

    • @NewsBroadcasting
      @NewsBroadcasting 4 роки тому +8

      Hi bob, im also in Calgary mine did not work at all.. pretty creepy it needs a lot of access to your phone it actually shiploads all your data to Israel

    • @toyota218921
      @toyota218921 4 роки тому +1

      @@NewsBroadcasting are you joking about your data going to Israel?

    • @NewsBroadcasting
      @NewsBroadcasting 4 роки тому +3

      @@toyota218921 no not at all....... setup a computer/linux server as a router open wire shark or linux network tracing programs

  • @Spathephoros
    @Spathephoros 3 роки тому +4

    That calibration at 0:26 was a real thing of beauty

  • @stang7043
    @stang7043 5 років тому +6

    I bought this about a year ago. I'm a simple DIY'er. I have used this several times and find it rather clumsy and hard to hold with your phone. But I do prefer this over your regular stud finder. But my go-to lately has been an endoscope. But again I live in a house that was built in 1998.

  • @Voltomess
    @Voltomess 2 роки тому +1

    I got this device about 3 years now and that was the best purchase for me. Finds studs perfectly shows me cables and pipes so I know where they are it's like a pocket x-ray for drywalls.

  • @herbm8709
    @herbm8709 5 років тому +21

    I bought one for some work in my house, it worked about 3/4 of the time, just enough to not trust it. I'm with you tapping on the wall and finding studs faster.

  • @jonathanmathews7673
    @jonathanmathews7673 3 роки тому +10

    For drywall my favorite stud finder is my knuckles and my ears. But when they aren't enough, the Bosch multi-scan is pretty darn good. I was really hoping the walabot would be a game changer

    • @robinfhild
      @robinfhild Рік тому

      Try the Stud buddy. It works by finding the screws with neodymium magnets

  • @msbav8r
    @msbav8r Рік тому +7

    The best stud finders are- 1. Rare Earth magnet. Easily finds the drywall screws. and 2. A very bright flashlight. No matter how well the seams have been finished, you can still find them quite easily by holding the flashlight up or down, parallel with the wall.

    • @pablot-r9402
      @pablot-r9402 Рік тому +2

      Definitely. The reason people get Walabots is for finding the wires and pipes and being able to identify them as such, VS thinking that a pipe / conduit is falsely a stud. Walabots are still pretty 1st Gen, so over time as they improve and as other makers come out with possibly better models, these can still be useful, especially for electricians and home / commercial audio-video-connectivity companies. ;-)

    • @thestumblingblock3459
      @thestumblingblock3459 Рік тому

      ​@@pablot-r9402I've used a zircon for 6 years and I'm easily able to find studs through thick plaster walls, as well as live electrical wires and plumbing. I believe it only cost me about $60, and I haven't had a problem with the backside getting torn up. I think the walabot is marketed more towards the DIY crowd.

  • @shadow-ny6gd
    @shadow-ny6gd 3 роки тому +3

    Inspired me to finally follow through with my handyman business thanks brother. I love the work, its just time to start it up.

  • @GAK1atatt
    @GAK1atatt Рік тому +2

    I get the same results as The Handyman. Spotty at best. I use it to locate wires and heating pipe and it does find them but just for a moment then the image disappears. It does test my patience. I decided to buy a longer wire than the short one that comes with it but haven't received it yet. Nice idea, needs to be more powerful.
    I bought mine 2 years ago and was going to send it back but was too caught up in remodeling to remember.

  • @danielyoder1462
    @danielyoder1462 5 років тому +41

    This was a good review. You should consider doing more product reviews. It's nice to see reviews from channels that I trust.

  • @kamoke1
    @kamoke1 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for showing me that I wasn't an idiot. I had no confidence in this thing on lathe and plaster walls, which is where I needed it to perform. It currently lives in a junk drawer and has taught me to be more cautious with these miracle tools.

    • @TheHandyman1
      @TheHandyman1  5 років тому +1

      I really wanted it to work. I didn't work at all like their commercials.

    • @kamoke1
      @kamoke1 5 років тому

      @@TheHandyman1 at least you didn't have to pay for it like the rest of us 👌🏻

  • @chadthorne9251
    @chadthorne9251 5 років тому +10

    Handyman got a cameraman. Livin' large!

  • @johnvas4173
    @johnvas4173 5 років тому +18

    I'll wait for the model that makes the sound effects from The Predator movie.

  • @paul-ld9vh
    @paul-ld9vh 5 років тому +6

    I have the Walabot. The one thing that I was hoping it would help with was determining when multiple studs were side by side. It seemed to have a hard time giving a clear image. Maybe I need to try working with it more.

  • @DennisMathias
    @DennisMathias 2 роки тому +1

    Where do you get those knuckle knockers? That sounds like the best deal. I don't know what that cell phone thingy was for.

  • @RyanRKJ
    @RyanRKJ 2 роки тому

    I saw an ad for this product. It looked great, but I was skeptical. Came here for the video and comments. I've since concluded that I definitely don't need to buy this product. I have a Stanley stud finder. It's not great, but is still somewhat useful, and does not require excessive calibration every time you put it to a wall.

    • @Voltomess
      @Voltomess 2 роки тому

      excessive calibration? seriously? lol 5 sec is excessive? I got this device about 3 years now and that was the best purchase for me. Finds studs perfectly shows me cables and pipes so I know where they are it's like a pocket x-ray for drywalls.

  • @ChristianConservativ
    @ChristianConservativ 2 роки тому

    Knocking and listening is the way I was raised. I will not conform! Records are finally coming back. I just need to wait longer.

  • @jeffr8282
    @jeffr8282 3 роки тому +2

    I just used it on lathe and plaster. It found wood studs precisely in both wall and ceiling.

    • @bootmenow
      @bootmenow Рік тому

      I'm concerned about wire behind them... Any luck there?

  • @irishhandyman2009
    @irishhandyman2009 5 років тому +4

    Thanks for the review. Like a lot of people I was considering 1 of these, but after watching a real world review, think I will save my money. Might be good if all your work involved you only dealing with drywall. Cant wait to see your follow up vid. Keep on keepin on.👍

  • @rickfanta4323
    @rickfanta4323 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the video. Would have been nice to try a wall with fiberglass insulation behind, and see if it still finds the wires, pipes, etc.

  • @Bapuji42
    @Bapuji42 Рік тому

    The most reliable stud finder I've found for drywall is the Stud Buddy. Magnets find drywall screws 100% of the time and never run out of batteries. If I need to find the exact center of a stud (screws aren't always dead center) I push in a finish nail to map out the edges. Of course it doesn't find electric or pipes.

  • @Cameron-ur2tk
    @Cameron-ur2tk 5 років тому +1

    looks to be reliable as a stud finder on plaster.I like the idea of it picking up electrical lines though.

  • @TW-gq5gi
    @TW-gq5gi 2 роки тому +6

    Thank you for your review on the Walabot DIY. I watched a few others and I had some questions. 1) I noticed on your review you said you have to recalibrate every time you brake the surface of the wall you are testing. I have noticed others do a demonstration and they pick it up and place it down without recalibrating and it looks to work correctly. What is your opinion on this? 2) How well does it work with metal studs? 3) Have you been able to review the DIY2? 4) If so what is your opinion on it?

  • @brianingell3174
    @brianingell3174 4 місяці тому

    bought mine on eBay for 50$ A) holding the stack of phone/walabot is hard to do with the rubber squishy pad on the back as a problem. B) as reported above any concrete or slightly textured wall sounds like it will be wrecked after calibrating it. C) with vertical wires sticking up behind the drywall it gave hit or miss readings even mapping them out. D) did I mention it's hard to hold vertically without dropping it without hard hand pressure and any less requires calibration again. E) it's much more cumbersome that my expensive stud finder which luckily is still talking to me after being jilted. F) I'm glad I can return it and I didn't pay a couple hundred bucks....

  • @Peter-.H
    @Peter-.H 5 років тому +11

    The walabot is available right now for $99.95. It seems to be working fine on drywall, but I wouldn’t put my faith on anything else.
    For me, it is too fragile and too expensive to bring on job sites .
    Thanks for the very honest and informative review.👍

    • @soilsurvivor
      @soilsurvivor 2 роки тому

      Don't waste your money.
      Useless and invasive piece of crap.

  • @rlatimer1962
    @rlatimer1962 Рік тому

    Thank you for the review. My wife bought me one for Christmas. Was real excited. Found holding the phone and pushing the tool a bit cumbersome. I know you can attach it as well. Found the calibration in smaller areas does not quite work. For the money spent I do not think it was worth it but I'll continue to work with it for a useful purpose. Its about trust with the tool and I guess once that is earned it may be worth the price.

  • @fireyourrocketts
    @fireyourrocketts Рік тому

    I just got one yesterday from Amazon; kind of works on drywall; intermittently as images comes and go but worthless on thicker walls; I need it to find studs on the outside walls which are stucco; forget it. For that price at $200+ is going right back.

  • @k5jrx3
    @k5jrx3 2 роки тому +1

    Love the concept, but not sure the bugs are worked out. We have been using the Franklin stud finder for about 6 years now, but of course we have no ability to find wires or conduit etc. Even so, it has been the most accurate and useful we have found to date

  • @Aepek
    @Aepek 5 років тому +2

    Saw this a few months ago & bought it to give it a go. Wanted to like it, but just was costing me time, & kept second guessing if was accurate....so would breakout my Zircon to double check all the time, lol.) After 15 days of use I just couldn’t keep using it, as was getting frustrated & wasn’t worth the time & hassle for me; so I returned it & went back to my Zircon finders (Have multifinder with a lot of features/functions & stud finder with deep scan).Looking forward to see the next vid about this tool, & then your final opinion/thoughts about the product.
    My all time dream scanner would be an x-ray hand held scanner. Know they do have these in the marketplace, but my wallet refuses to open up & give me the money to buy one😉
    Cheers✌🏻

  • @HieuTran-iy3ui
    @HieuTran-iy3ui 2 роки тому

    Hope you make another video ,this time stack 2 or 4 pieces of 2” x16”x16” thickness concrete patio stone
    and lay a couple metal bars under these concrete stones and test this device, see how good it is?
    Thanks

  • @HonestOK2930
    @HonestOK2930 2 роки тому +3

    This would work great for finding outlets covered by drywallers. I remodel older homes with lathe and plaster and I've yet to find a good scanner.
    Depending on how extensive the remodel is, I sometimes opt to pull it all off an out up drywall

    • @ChristopherLeeMusic1983
      @ChristopherLeeMusic1983 2 роки тому

      Gotta get some better drywall people. I cut the squares out when I hang drywall. Takes 2 secs with a box blade on an oscillating tool.

    • @hey_itxfhd
      @hey_itxfhd 2 роки тому

      Also For Spying On Ppl Having S*X

  • @patagoniacontracting5667
    @patagoniacontracting5667 5 років тому +4

    I got one to try it out, but I can find a stud faster by knocking than conectinting the stupid thing.
    An for wired and pipes I can usually guess.
    Thank for the video.

  • @papasmurf7684
    @papasmurf7684 4 роки тому +2

    Why did you do it on concrete? Does it claim to work on that or did you just decide to do it to see how well it may work on that as well.

  • @doctorwigglespank8933
    @doctorwigglespank8933 5 років тому +96

    I was thinking that this would make a great gift for someone you don't particularly like, but there are cheaper ways to annoy someone.

    • @royalway12
      @royalway12 3 роки тому +3

      Waiting about 3 seconds to proceed after the light turns green, is much cheaper. But giving today's society, more dangerous.

    • @michaeldepow6663
      @michaeldepow6663 2 роки тому +2

      Mine worked great

    • @drew8222
      @drew8222 Рік тому +1

      Green light.. smash Sandoval on sight.. 😂🤣😹😎

    • @thestumblingblock3459
      @thestumblingblock3459 Рік тому

      ​@@michaeldepow6663I don't know how much this one costs, but my $60 one has worked well for the last 6 years and also detects live wires and will differentiate between studs and safety plates. Plus it don't get tore-up.

  • @autonomous44
    @autonomous44 5 років тому +3

    First time I’ve ever seen another person, albeit camera man/off screen. Usually I’m immersed like I’m watching someone inside the matrix or the last man alive, fixing up houses in an empty world lol. The fish eye adds to it. This was a nice break from that though lol.

  • @streetfiremkv12
    @streetfiremkv12 5 років тому +4

    If it was consistent in finding pipes and electrical it would 100% useful to me

  • @thomasjones-yc8lf
    @thomasjones-yc8lf 2 роки тому

    Had several over the years. Most were OK to excellent on sheetrock, except in my garage - maybe they put two layers with some kind of heat shield? The last one I got, ProSensor T13 Professional Stud Finder, worked about the best but I still find an outlet and then measure off 16" on centers, etc.

  • @synapticburn
    @synapticburn 5 років тому +15

    interested in the electrical portion, if it can reliably find wires it might be useful for TV installers, cable guys, and electricians etc
    for studs I use the ch Hansen neodymium magnet studfinder that sticks to nails. 8 bucks on amazon

    • @synapticburn
      @synapticburn 2 роки тому

      @Freki Bodgaedir I love in Houston, it's virtually non existent here. 99 percent of homes are drywall

  • @rweakley
    @rweakley Рік тому +1

    The old scientific "knock test" as the control variable.

  • @mics3747
    @mics3747 5 років тому +12

    After I watched half a dozen reviews of this device it seems that few people trust. So I won’t get my hopes up.

  • @neosmith80
    @neosmith80 3 роки тому

    how does this work for ceilings with popcorn?

  • @primoservices5636
    @primoservices5636 5 років тому +1

    I have heard they work ok. How much are they that would determine if they are worth it if it works for drywall that would help not miss studs and have extra holes at times. Good tool to test help me decide. I been doing handyman work for 32 yrs any help to be more efficient and professional i'm all for it. Keep up the good work !

  • @MyDIYAdventures
    @MyDIYAdventures 5 років тому +1

    You finally hired someone to follow you around all day with a camera!😃

    • @TheHandyman1
      @TheHandyman1  5 років тому +2

      Absolutely not. That was the customer who's house I was working in that day.

    • @MyDIYAdventures
      @MyDIYAdventures 5 років тому +2

      Phew! I for a second thought you went all Kardashian on us!😂

  • @scottgutauckis4615
    @scottgutauckis4615 4 роки тому +2

    I bought this and found its about as reliable as the other three stud finders in my tool box. Its a hit or miss.

  • @Michael-gu8ck
    @Michael-gu8ck 2 роки тому +5

    I have about 5 different stud finders as an occasional diy'er, all a pain the azz. The little ole magnet stud finder is very useful. The Walabot sounds like a great concept, but needs to be improved and refined more before i'd purchase one.

  • @woodmax69
    @woodmax69 5 років тому

    I does a good job of finding the wires behind the wall as you demonstrated.

  • @jamescrinnion8240
    @jamescrinnion8240 5 років тому +2

    Thanks Handyman. Been eagerly awaiting this review. I'm considering the FLIR C2 or C3 thermal cameras as a better possible alternative.

  • @DJWRailroad
    @DJWRailroad Рік тому

    Useful feedback for substrates. Results on lath & plaster appear to generate no better results than regular electronic stud finders, at least not definitive, accurate or reliable results.

  • @royalway12
    @royalway12 3 роки тому +1

    Is there a product that detects dead wires? I have an older home with the plaster walls. The wire is hot at the box, but dead at the switch. Having trouble finding it's route clear across the house from the garage, to the front of the house. I want to tear up a minimum of the wall to find it.

  • @erk6700
    @erk6700 2 роки тому

    Bought a bunch of neodymium magnets, 1/4 in. diameter, place one inside a transparent plastic cup or glass cup. Rotate the cup on the wall until the magnet sticks to a nail. From there on the rest of the nails are vertically with respect to the first magnet. And sideways about 16 inches apart.

  • @mato2l
    @mato2l 2 роки тому

    I believe if you move it up and down after you have moved left to right it will give you a more accurate reading of whether it's a stud or not.

  • @psykosteel
    @psykosteel 3 роки тому +2

    I bought one about the time that you did, it's never worked well and their support was only so so. They said that the heavy knockdown textured walls were the problem. It's a great idea and concept, but I think they need more product development before they are top-notch the way that they promote it. I'd trust a magnet before I trust one of these.

  • @williamevans7932
    @williamevans7932 5 років тому +1

    Looks about as useful as a radar detector. Maybe try a dowsing rod ? My grandfather swore by them for finding water. He told me it has a 10 year learning curve.

  • @cbro777
    @cbro777 2 роки тому

    I wonder if that thing can detect a screw or nail that's been ran through wire.

  • @letmefindout81
    @letmefindout81 3 роки тому

    I think the idea is good, but i don't think it's ready for the open market yet.

  • @ADAMX777
    @ADAMX777 5 років тому +11

    I almost bought one of these but found a lot of people who got too many false positive readings to trust it every time. For budget friendly I love the Franklin sensor I ended up buying.

    • @RodneyThomas
      @RodneyThomas 3 роки тому +1

      Link to Franklin Sensor?

    • @ADAMX777
      @ADAMX777 3 роки тому

      @@RodneyThomas I have the model 710

    • @mostlikelywedoitservices6926
      @mostlikelywedoitservices6926 2 роки тому

      How many do I own from cost friendly to Bouch. Then so many times the hammer or the magnet give me what I am in need of. Just did one on stucco and it was my knowledge that found the studs with a hammer.

  • @kirksennett899
    @kirksennett899 2 роки тому

    I'm wondering if it will pick up radiant heat wires embedded in ceiling

  • @cfranklin7728
    @cfranklin7728 5 років тому +1

    Thank you for review. Been considering this product for awhile.

  • @howardmiller7716
    @howardmiller7716 5 років тому +2

    I bought one at the beginning of the year and found it works on drywall for studs, wires and pipes. It does not work at all on exterior stucco walls. I have a small sheet of 1/16th plastic I place on every wall to run the Walabot over to keep from marking the walls and give it a smooth surface to ride on. That makes it even less user friendly. For $70 it sits in my tool bag and I use it to confirm other methods on sheet rock. I tried a FLIR camera and that was worthless on exterior walls also. The FLIR gave a rough idea on interior walls. The next gadget I tried for exterior stucco is an endoscope camera for my phone. Drill a 1/4" hole and insert the camera. If there is no insulation it works, sometimes. Still searching for the best way to find a stud in exterior stucco.....It isn't my knuckle!

  • @cliffcox7643
    @cliffcox7643 2 роки тому

    hey guy, you should show more of the screen closely, that's what we'll see, and on a split screen what's behind the drywall.. I want to see what to expect when I encounter a PIPE, WIRES, STUDS, BOXES, CONDUIT, etc.. I side by side view of the screen and what's behind the test wall.. Then this vid will be truly helpful for those deciding and you'll get lots of views.

  • @maxcarter3413
    @maxcarter3413 5 років тому +10

    Needs work. Thanks for saving me money and frustration!

  • @localone1597
    @localone1597 Рік тому

    I've been thinking about getting one. However it doesn't seem too much better than other stud finders when you consider the cost. It costs way too much to not have better results. Your review was some time ago, maybe its better now. I don't know? Maybe I'll try to find more current videos

  • @123abcrobable
    @123abcrobable 3 роки тому

    I wish you would have run a pilot hole where it was telling you there was a stud to test if it was correct or not.

  • @jakejones5991
    @jakejones5991 5 років тому +1

    Always wondered about this thing! Never tried it. I always use a magnet or the knuckle.

    • @TheHandyman1
      @TheHandyman1  5 років тому +4

      Both those methods are a little hard on lath and plaster.

  • @jaqmartial7782
    @jaqmartial7782 2 роки тому

    I have one of those purchased last December for a gift. In my opinion, this is not worth the cost. The most impractical part is holding the Wallabot to the telephone when you move it.. I tried rubber bands but it stops reading.. so maybe expand the sticky circle if it can be done.
    But I have to admit when it works it is very good.
    I also think the software can be updated regularly when you have a product to increase the field of reading, like tiles, concrete etc...
    Nice idea but impractical at this time.

  • @anthonygriffin1147
    @anthonygriffin1147 5 років тому

    Glad to see they added some useful functionality to this device. Otherwise this is kind of a waste of cash for anybody who has been in construction for any real amount of time.

  • @krankinkogs
    @krankinkogs 5 років тому +17

    thanks for wasting ur money before i wasted mine!

  • @RN-hx1rs
    @RN-hx1rs 5 років тому +3

    A thermal camera works good finding studs

  • @BCRenovationMagazine
    @BCRenovationMagazine 5 років тому

    Good video there, Handyman. That looks very cumbersome to use with all the calibration, dangling wire, sticky pad, etc. I have been using stud finders on an almost daily basis for about 40 years. My Zircon multi scanners have worked very well for me. I was doing a job for a lonely single lady one time and she was admiring my stud finder. She asked if she could borrow it to find a 'stud'. :-)

  • @carlosquin4822
    @carlosquin4822 2 роки тому

    Franklin sensors for Studs period end of story multiple lights to detect stacked 2*4 studs nothing comes close!!

  • @krap101
    @krap101 3 роки тому

    I returned it within a week. You have to recalibrate every time it leaves the wall, it wasn't very quick, and the readings weren't consistent.

  • @agoodsheperd880
    @agoodsheperd880 2 роки тому

    Can it find studs in an exterior wall with vynl siding and OSB sheathing?

  • @barneylan876
    @barneylan876 2 роки тому

    Thanks for your demonstration !

  • @chrisgibson6097
    @chrisgibson6097 5 років тому +7

    There not worth the trouble wife got me one it seems to work pretty good but wastes to much time

  • @grandmasfavorites
    @grandmasfavorites 5 років тому +5

    Thanks for your review.

  • @justinmason435
    @justinmason435 3 роки тому

    Mine works just fine. You shouldn’t drag that across jagged concrete bro. You literally barely have to touch it to wall. Put Saran Wrap on it. Painters tape doesn’t work that good. I am also a beta tester, trust me tho you don’t have to drag it if you just hold your fingers a tiny little bit farther on the sides and kinda let it ride on your finger tips; it works better that way. Hope that helps.

  • @Arkine13
    @Arkine13 5 років тому +1

    Seems to me like knuckles are cheaper and more reliable, at least on plaster/drywall. Concrete...knuckles are not recommended. LOL Thanks for posting!

  • @punchymuffin6402
    @punchymuffin6402 2 роки тому

    Isn't the max those are rated for is lap and plaster? If you were not using it on concrete it would probably not get so scratched.

  • @michaeldepow6663
    @michaeldepow6663 2 роки тому +1

    The app is missing from the app store now. Wtf!?

  • @chrimony
    @chrimony Рік тому

    I would trust a magnet finding screws/nails over your knocking.

  • @Vander_Galien_Handyman
    @Vander_Galien_Handyman 2 роки тому

    Any luck on old plaster and lath houses?

  • @JMGeranimo
    @JMGeranimo 3 роки тому

    Their are free apps that detect emf transmission, they definitely work around anything magnetic.

  • @mostlikelywedoitservices9743
    @mostlikelywedoitservices9743 5 років тому +2

    I have cheap to expensive scanners. Sheetrock I will swing my magnet and guarantee I found a stud. Scanners are great hope. So far there lacking. Many times there right, and others let me just tap the wall.

  • @michael102387
    @michael102387 2 роки тому

    So it works cool but what other kind of troubles can you get into, like seeing into rooms?

  • @stevenlotozynski4932
    @stevenlotozynski4932 2 роки тому

    Idk if they fixed the bugs but I only use it for plaster and drywall and I've always hit a stud so far. My son just got it for me 4 months ago its been used about 20 times.

    • @TheHandyman1
      @TheHandyman1  2 роки тому +2

      They have a new one out and I will be testing it this month.

  • @Jaihind_RG
    @Jaihind_RG 3 роки тому

    Any product suggestions for to scan items what’s inside in the box 📦, ? Much appreciated

  • @scottmiller9098
    @scottmiller9098 5 років тому +2

    Is the Mini-Me Handyman running the camera for this video? Is he wearing "The Vest"?

  • @mikefry472
    @mikefry472 5 років тому +31

    Yes i bought that thing and threw it in the customers garbage after i missed 6 studs snd had to fix her whole wall. Waste of money

    • @IronCypher
      @IronCypher 5 років тому +4

      U can't return it?

    • @woodman1701
      @woodman1701 4 роки тому

      Thanks for the review.
      After reading a few reviews, yours was the final one to make me not buy a walabot. Have a great day.

  • @brandonbaker850
    @brandonbaker850 2 роки тому

    could your tape be throwing it off?

  • @fishoil2158
    @fishoil2158 3 роки тому

    I should think that a hand held radar running on a phone battery should not be able to penetrate much concrete at all. there just isn't enough power

  • @ragmanintx
    @ragmanintx 3 роки тому +2

    Franklin. All I use. Cause it works.

    • @designertjp-utube
      @designertjp-utube 3 роки тому

      Agreed. I kept checkin' the Franklin Stud Finder on & off my Amazon Shopping List because I keep giving Walabot a 2nd Chance in their video presentations. As we can easily see here today, his Walabot is still 2 to 3 upgrade versions away from making a decision to buy. Your Franklin will help keep the rent paid until then.

  • @ryancorcoran465
    @ryancorcoran465 9 місяців тому

    Do you need a certain type of phone Mark does it work on an iPhone?

  • @onthetrail3457
    @onthetrail3457 4 роки тому

    Any thought that maybe when he put tape on the device because it was scratched that he covered the sensor needed for it to work right.

  • @ssdtrain1
    @ssdtrain1 2 роки тому

    You think the tape is interfering ?

  • @larz101a
    @larz101a 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for saving me some money great vid!

  • @calivalley9056
    @calivalley9056 5 років тому +1

    Did you ever go back and figure out the frozen sprinkler house?

  • @douglasadams4540
    @douglasadams4540 5 років тому

    Can you find anything below ground. Like sprinklers or pipes ??

  • @thepipesarecallingme
    @thepipesarecallingme 3 роки тому

    That scratching sound is like nails on a chalk board