Will the Philippines succeed in its case at ICJ against China for Extended Continental Shelf?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
- In 2012, the United Nations recognized Benham Rise as part of the Philippines' extended continental shelf, uncontested by China. Recently, the Philippines submitted a new claim for an extended continental shelf in the South China Sea, emphasizing their exclusive right to explore and exploit natural resources. This region is marked by increasing maritime conflicts, particularly with China, whose expansive claims overlap with those of the Philippines and other nations. Despite a 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration invalidating China's claims, Beijing disputes the decision. Rising tensions have seen Chinese ships assaulting Philippine vessels, raising concerns of armed conflict. Initially seeking economic benefits from China, former President Duterte downplayed the tribunal's ruling. His successor, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., strengthened ties with the US after failed investments and continued Chinese aggression. The EU has increased support for the Philippines, promoting regional cooperation. China's rejection of the Philippines' recent claim highlights the complexity of maritime disputes and the need for diplomatic resolutions. Establishing maritime boundaries is crucial for securing resources and preventing conflicts. Like, comment, and subscribe for more in-depth coverage of global economies and geopolitics. Watch complete video and do not forget to visit our channel for more interesting videos.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0:00 Will PH succeed in its case at ICJ against China?
1:18 Rising Tensions between China and Philippines in the South China Sea
6:08 Background on the ECS Claim
8:01 Territorial and maritime sovereignty
12:24 China Rejects Philippines' Attempt to Extend Continental Shelf in South China Sea
16:47 The Philippines Dilemma: How to manage tensions in the SCS?
20:30 Conclusion
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buy me a coffee: buymeacoffee.com/thepacificre...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support us at Patreon: / thepacificreport
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us on our WhatsApp Channel with the link below:
whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaIZ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Social Media Links:
Website: www.thepacificreports.com
UA-cam: / @pacificreport
Patreon: / thepacificreport
Facebook: / thepacificreportpr
Instagram: / @thepacificreports
Threads: www.threads.net/@thepacificre...
Twitter: / pacific_reports
TikTok: / thepacificreport
Tumblr: www.tumblr.com/thepacificreport
Mix: mix.com/thepacificreport
OK: ok.ru/profile/589448821950
Pintrest: / thepacificreport
#PhilippinesEEZ #extendedcontinentalshelf #philippinesvschina #UNCLOS #ICJ #philippinemilitary #ferdinandmarcosjr #philippinenavy #philippinemilitaryassets #philippines #southchinasea #xijinping
Disclaimer:
The content in this video reflects the author(s)' thoughts and does not represent the official viewpoint of The Pacific Report; viewers are recommended to conduct their own research and seek expert advice before relying on the information provided.
![24 Oras Express: June 27, 2024 [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CNHL7nmhEdE/mqdefault.jpg)
![24 Oras Express: June 27, 2024 [HD]](/img/tr.png)
Who Owns the Second Thomas Shoal?
ua-cam.com/video/Qo4_OvGD3Bk/v-deo.html
its the Philippines reason because of the Treaty of Washington in 1900 all other claimants are False claims fairytale & fictional
The West Philippines Sea or Philippines EEZ is not anymore contested because the tribunal has already ruled out in favor of the Philippines.
One of the Geological Evidences that Philippines submit for it's Extended Continental Shelf in the West Palawan Region(where the location of Spratly Islands, considered a Sub-archipelagic Group of the Greater Palawan Archipelagic System composed of several Groups of Islands(Palawan(Mainland), Bacuit, Calamianes, Balabac, Cuyo, Kalayaan(Spratly's) and Cagayancillo in Sulu Sea) is the presence of the Mindoro-Palawan Microcontinent, which is an Extension and part of the overall Greater Philippine Mobile Belt System.
Sabah as well
Stop patronizing Chinese products.
PHILIPPINES MUST
STAND THE 2016
ARBITRAL AWARDS
BY THE UNCLOS, WITH CONFIRMATION BY
THE MAJORITY OF
ALL SIGNING MEMBERS OF UNITED NATIONS,
IF THIS INTERNATIONAL
MARITIME LAWS OF
UNCLOS COULD NOT BE IMPLEMENTED OF THE RIGHT TIME, I CAN SAY THAT OUR
UNITED NATIONS IS
USELESS AT ALL, HAVE NO POLICE POWER, IN THAT CASE ITS BETTER TO DISBAND THIS
KIND OF UNITED NATIONS NO POWER AT ALL,
WPS has been no longer disputed with the 2016 PCA Ruling.
In fact, it's the tseknots that transgressed, invaded rocks at Kalayaan Islands Group.
😅😅😅 In your dream？ PCA has no jurisdtion over soverienty disputation.
Good reporter please help the Philippines.
Win or lose, Xi Jinping will just ignore it.
China please behave and follow international law. For peace.
Well,I believe it.From 200miles EEZ to 350miles.
It's already been decided, the P.I. has the right on those contested Island. The problem is the ICJ can't police and implement the ruling.
Wannabe superpower China is the problem! Although a signatory to UNCLOS, it doesn't recognize the ruling, perhaps thinking they're on their way to be a "superpower", perhaps they can get away with it? CCP days are numbered!
Bringing the case to ICJ, both parties need to sign an agreement as the decision by the court is binding. Will China agree? UNCLOS does not deal with sovereignty but only on maritime issues.
I think, Judiciary is different from Executive. ICJ have no jusrisdiction over the police ang implementation of its rulings and decisions.
@@bluedragon7849 Ha ha ha ha. Do read what is ICJ. It is the only court under the UN unlike PCA or ICC. Everytime making any claim you refer to the UN but if not in your favour you give excuses. Think
Without a doubt
Yes
18:49 French teacher here. 👨🏻🏫 "RAPPROCHEMENT" is pronounced as "RAH-prosh-MA," not "RAH-prosh-MINT." 🙋🏻♂️🇺🇸🤝🇫🇷
Maybe that's how you pronounced it in FRANCE but who cares. we all understand it mr. dicktionary.
If the Philippines succeeds at ICJ with the extension of our outer limits of our continental shelf. Malaysia should relinquish Sabah for good!
Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.
@hopelope1703 Mr. Know All, the case is over! Malaysia took the case to two different courts and lost! You need to update your current events or join Malaysia for a third protest! The courts are in the process of obligating Sabah's return to the Philippines! Poor you!
China made their own extension map with boundery line at sea not been appreciated by many people with sound mind .
Sultanate of sulu is the real owner or kingdom of maharlika
this extended continental shelf by Philippines should be secondary claim the primary claim should be the "Uti Possidestis Juris Principle/Doctrine" because China and other claimants summited in the Permanent Court of Arbitration recognizing the 3 treaties govern Philippine Territory especially the Treaty of Washington of 1900 in which immensely aided Philippines claim in essence China & other claimant becomes party to the Treaty of Washington 1900 & bound & party to the treaty so all of them cannot deny that Spratly islands/rocks & state of Sabah are belong to Philippine territory especially Malaysia who is now double bound to the treaty of Washington 1900 1st inherited from the British 2nd in UNCLOS maritime dispute between China & PH so the Philippines can now assert as the sole valid claimant of large part of the South China Sea so the issue of who claims who everyone except the Philippines is false claimant, Trespassing & illegal occupation of sovereign territory
How is the Philippines being a “false claimant” if the 1982 UNCLOS entitles the Philippines 200 nm for fishing and sea bed resources from its coastline and the entitlement of another 150 nm based on geologic/geomorphic proof which it has in the submittal? Are you sure China isnt practicing malevolent distractive tactics to wear down the Philippines so it will in the end give in and allow China a lion share of its natural resources which China covets? This seems to be very clear specially when we consider China’s irreversible and humongous economic upheaval, repetitive natural tempests, unmitigating diseases and self-collapsing edifices and infrastructures. It does appear China's behavior thus far are the result of actions of a desperate and proud country who is looking for an undeserved payback to save themselves from a coming oblivion which they themselves created.
In 1900, the Philippines was just a colony without sovereignty, and all Philippine rights belonged to the United States
@@stunstar4553 well what can I say either you are innocent or ignorant who doesn't read what's the topics and person who cant understand what is posted comment mean?
@@adamrichard1641 , bottom line is, no one believes in China’s claim anyway and is more of a gunboat diplomacy. That means they show up with their big coast guard ships or with numerical superiority and flaunt their large number of warships. That is their logic and it includes Taiwan the country who’ve always been under seige. I hope they see the Philippine Military as a rising regional power and they will soon be challenged. Chinas economy will be a fading memory.
For issues of the land: We need ask Emporer of Qin~Qing or ChinghisKhan not the Espania King Phillips nor British Queens.
For the issues of the Sea: We need to ask the NAVY or the Coastal Guard
Rules how,? For 100years. Brown
Not just ph but also if I'm not wrong Malaysia, and Vietnam
China should be estopped from going to Unclos to oppose this latest submission because of its disrespect of the 2016 arbitral decision despite it being a signatory of Unclos.
Is this their doing to dominate the world? Program of dominating as no.1 will disrupt, barriers are international regulation, conflicting ideas and defensive regulation of nations, geographical position, As abiding citizen of this wolrd We are bound to limited regulation not might makes right, it the the consensus of all member country involved. We are still to apply it in basis of regulation, negotiations, and arbitral award.
So so souse sads,now i see in my eyes who isvanish ocean garden..the ectar i see enough to start ..tell telll i dont care wht whou you are and we are,i think someone be punish be punishing i dont know but for meeee,sino ka ulet ,🦆🦆🦆tao-chinatown restaurant,who is ______________sapat lang siguro ang laki nang bansa nila.ilang taon na yang mga intsek nayan nagnanakaw sa mundong daigdig.......
I’m sure win
Philippines used the 1900 Treaty of Washing, 2016 West Philippine Sea Arbitration, and 2022 North Borneo Arbitration. Philippines is supported by many countries...Too bad for China and Malaysia...
if Malaysia ally with China, most of ASEAN will side with Malaysia. you are not familiar with the region's politic. Philippines is really on thin ice now... it is irrational and stupid for Philippines to start shit with Malaysia since that raise alot of red flag in ASEAN politic. and it kills the narrative that this is a battle against China.
Speak English to be understood by other foreign nations.
the usual alibi of China not facing the Philippines is whitemans court 🤣🤣🤣🤣
The South China Sea arbitration case was organized by a non-UN private court, which is invalid.
On July 13, 2016, the United Nations issued a statement on its official Weibo, stating that the Permanent Court of Arbitration has no relationship with the United Nations.
• The International Court of Justice issued a statement on its official website. The statement stated that "the award in the South China Sea Arbitration was made by a special arbitral tribunal under the Permanent Court of Arbitration. As a completely different institution, the International Court of Justice has never participated in the arbitration case."
On July 15, 2016, Benjamin Benilschke, press officer of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, stated that the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea has neither played any role in the arbitration case. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea has no relationship with the South China Sea Arbitration Tribunal.
lol...
IDOOOT china sign on UNCLOS?
@@yayeltv sure but bring it up to proper court...The South China Sea arbitration case was organized by a non-UN private court, which is invalid.
On July 13, 2016, the United Nations issued a statement on its official Weibo, stating that the Permanent Court of Arbitration has no relationship with the United Nations.
• The International Court of Justice issued a statement on its official website. The statement stated that "the award in the South China Sea Arbitration was made by a special arbitral tribunal under the Permanent Court of Arbitration. As a completely different institution, the International Court of Justice has never participated in the arbitration case."
On July 15, 2016, Benjamin Benilschke, press officer of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, stated that the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea has neither played any role in the arbitration case. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea has no relationship with the South China Sea Arbitration Tribunal.
lol...
Divine Justice and Protection for THE PHILIPPINES and THE FILIPINOS .
if the ICJ and UNCLOS are True into their Intentions..
Any arbitral ruling needs to be attended and agreed by all the parties involved in order to be valid. China did not attend or agree to the ruling.
By this same logic, you can't hire a few retired judges and lease a court room to rule that you now own the house down the street.
The fact that the arbitral ruling was 'created' in 2016 clearly implies that the island was owned by China before 2016 and the Philippines is the one claiming the island as their own.
I am by no means an expert in the international maritime laws. I am just giving my humble opinion based on what you said in your video.
LMAO 🤣🤣 nice logical nonsense
no it doesnt need that both parties will attend. because there are times that other party will not attend because they know that they will loose or no legal basis for their claim.
If China do not recognize the PCA ruling coz it has no jurisdiction on the Philippine complaint then what court for China was the proper court has jurisdiction and file your own arbitration case vs the Republic of the Philippines ! RP will face you in that international court recognized by the whole universe and any ruling will be reconized by both parties.. After the ruling the loser no crying victim please and no flexing of muscle and displaying that might makes right !
Chi! 🤪😜😂😅👉 - - - - > 🇨🇳
The pinoys even claim Sabah as their territory , what a joke
英國學者：美日介入南海爭端 令人憤慨和震驚
ua-cam.com/video/Fxi9WtUIiC0/v-deo.html
What are you saying? Whatever is mine is mine.
中外學者用史料和法理 論證南海諸島的主權屬於中國
ua-cam.com/video/kPibGfBXWVs/v-deo.html
theory is never considered as a fact. :)
@@JohnKevinCordova-it9fs So fists are the solution if right is not accepted as right by a crook.
So silly trying to grap something real already in the hands of the true owner!
英國學者：美日介入南海爭端 令人憤慨和震驚
ua-cam.com/video/Fxi9WtUIiC0/v-deo.html
Again, facts are not facts?
And What is the reason for your government not providing those legal evidence to back up the claim in international court?
based on history china is part of tibet.
Needless to say the ICJ will award to PH as the ICJ is an instrument of the US to serve its cronies and puppets as well. But China have their points right and will serve justice as it deems so without ICJ bias verdict
stop eating too much fetus soup it's bad for your brain.
BABALIK YAN MAS MARAMI PA