As a tournament player one thing your videos have taught me is to watch their turn bet/reraise/checkraise amounts and opponent's remaining SPR carefully to avoid putting yourself in unnecessary call/fold situations when they're signaling a river jam with their bet structure. (And on the flip side, how to structure those positions yourself.)
I have Mark in a heads up poker match, but Lex is a former crossfit competitor and would probably lay Mark to waste in a boxing match. Let's get BOTH going!
Like the first hand explanation, where vs Fish we sometimes want to use larger bets when betting and attack their Turn X range, or their Turn probe range, but this can fall apart when we have no clue how to approach the River. Very simple explanation is just "plan ahead" and that requires some work + experience. But I think this is the beauty of Poker, is we can go down many different nodes, especially when we're trying to exploit.
As a former chess player and a current poker player, I appreciate the encouragement to plan ahead. One small quibble, the king high flush draw doesn't "kind of" have pot odds. The pot odds are 23% (it's right there on your table) and the outs to a flush are 18%. That's not quite odds to call and doesn't win in the long run.
@@hungryhorsepoker "pot odds are for when all the money goes in. otherwise this is completely irrelevant." ^^^This right here is next level brilliance!!!!!^^^ That is now in my poker Ten Commandments forever!
@@hungryhorsepoker Would love a future video to cover this, because I thought similar to @auntiesbeads on that specific hand! So clearly, I'm missing something😄 Thanks for another awesome video, btw! Love your content
Tx for your time educating about NLH cash. A question for you: In this video: "How I’d Make $100k in Poker, if I Had to Start Over" an example of R.F.I. with AKs in BTN send us to a Dry & Static board: A-7-2 rainbow. Why in that example the default flop action was to BET BIG or CHECK and with T-9s here the default flop action is to BET MEDIUM? As far as I understand your thought process for both cases, the BB Call in general is a signal of a wide range (we can generally eliminate AA, KK, AK, AQ, QQ, and JJ, some of the top of their range and some of the botton of their range).
Brilliant video. Only just come across your channel. Seems you’ve just completed a low stakes challenge. Will you do a video summarising your biggest low stakes tips you found over the year. Would be great to see as a new viewer
Why don’t u go try it when u see fit. Poker is a Bayesian game and everything depends on circumstance. Certainly it would work against a few players but you’d have to make that decision and identify where this video is relevant.
I was just asking same abt 1/2 $300 cap games, often w opponents even less effective, rangy, but sticky w top pair. Just gotta tighten up a bit and can't use these big boy overbets as often unless they're scared money. Player & stack dependant.
At 16:30 I'm sorry but I think it's too optimistic to believe a rec is folding AK here when "all the draws miss"... I'd say most fish are tanking and cry-calling here. Like 65% are not folding AK here... With another Ace high board then yes, good strat, they probably fold TPTK. But that 98 of spades that doesnt complete... kills your bluff against fish I'd say. I think I saw one of the hands of his Low Stakes challenge in which that is exactly what happens to him and gets called...
completely agree. not sure if recs see it this way but with those sizings you're only repping sets and 98 so even a10 with all the missed draws is equivalent to ak and may want to call
He's using 'reg' and 'fish' to describe weak players and targeting players capable of folding top pair, and plenty of fish are capable of doing this. But they're not calling stations --- they're a different kind of fish --- they'd have a subclass like 'rock' or 'weak passive' or 'weak-tight,' to distinguish the kind of mistakes they make and how to make money from them. You wouldn't do this against loose-aggressive or calling stations who you have seen call off with everything. But there are plenty of old dudes sitting out bomb pots set-mining happy to fold TPTK to aggression like this, they might even be winning players (against the calling stations) but they're exploitable by HH strategy.
@@dabluebery I think you are confusing Reg with Rec. But maybe I'm confusing rec (capable of folding) with fish (a noob who has not evolved to rec yet). If that's the case and his strat was aimed at recs and not fish then Mark Goone may be right there too, as he is in almost everything
@@adagiotal5417 Edited my first comment for a typo -- rec is for recreational player, and I think Marc uses 'rec' mostly as a synonym for fish, someone exploitable for some reason or another as I went into above. I think a good video for Marc would be stereotyping the various rec types at low limit games. Reg would be someone less exploitable.
As usual, great video. Question: I used to play in games that played big but many stacks were too short for the game. The game was NL $1/$3 with a forced straddle button of $10 that needed to be played from the button or UTG [whichever came first]. Players bought in from as low as $300 and could match the largest stack. You like to point out how to act based on action and sizing but never really discuss the impact of effective stack size. A small bet compared to the pot might be a big chunk of a players stack. Thinking you consider stack size as a bigger factor than pot size when gauging what a bet means but do not want to assume?
He deserves it . I don’t follow him after his live at the lodge just a douche both streams . He’s rude af go back and watch and read comments. He’s a sore ass loser complaining the whole time . Not the first drama either with that dude.
In your argument for checkraising 76s on 983A (around the 17:00 mark) one of your key points is that your opponent can't call 2 barrels with AK or AQ because you've "told them twice in no uncertain terms" that those hands are no good. I disagree with this. When you checkraise a fish on the turn there, BB vs Button, you're telling them "I have an A." He's going to respond with "Oh yeah? Well I have a bigger ace" and then dig in his heels with his big aces and usually call your big boy river bet to prove to you that his ace is better.
Meh a lot will fold to such a big jam on the river after a massive raise on the turn. It's always important to identify the calling stations and trappers though, especially when using HHP strats. Just overbet for value against these villains and bluff small. This also applies when you've been caught bluffing big. If people are very willing to risk their entire 200+ bb stack with TPTK then it's easy to extract value.
@@ronnieplanter6402 I don't have an issue with the general bluffing ideas Marc endorses --- he always stresses how it's not logically consistent to think players will stack off with one pair when you're bluffing but not when you're value betting --- and he's right. I just think THIS particular situation is different. When they specifically have AK or AQ AND it's BB vs button AND the ace turns after the flop goes check check.
@@FGrimeson fair enough, I personally do think it's a profitable bluff in general, maybe slightly too little fold equity when they specifically have AK, but that's pretty player dependent i guess. On the other hand, I'm known for punting off stacks so what do I know lol
Marc..Dan here. Like your videos. My question is the hand at 20 min where u flop an open ender. The villian bets weak and you say raise than bomb the turn. The first thing I thought of is many rec players won't just bet weak w 2nd or here but also draws. When you raise the villian won't fold his draws and even if u bomb the turn he won't fold his draws like straight draws or nfd. I'm not sure how much of his range is draws on qstsx board but I'm thinking a lot of his hands are draws. Can you address this? I don't usually raise boards like this oop because the villian has a lot of draws when he bets weak and there's not a lot of fold equity.
question about the bootcamp, don’t play live since my bankroll is only 3-4k atm (built it up crushing online low stakes 20/50nl) but I play like 50k hands a month online, should I apply or is it just live? I am a crusher (6k profit in 4 months of 50nl)
The boot camp will def help improve your game but withdraw 1-2k from your online roll 1st and start playing some live 1/2 when you get the chance. It'll be much softer than games you're already beating plus you'll get more out of the bootcamp when you do take it. Not to mention, you'll more than likely run up that roll a bit so it'll soften the blow from the cost of the bootcamp
Not sure I agree with the analysis. First hand: if flop goes check / check, nobody except the most fishy opponent is going to bet big on the turn with a monster (set / 2 pairs). These hands are going to bet small to entice a call. And after being called, they would bet small on the river *again* hoping for a call or a bluff raise. The idea that people telegraph the strength of their hand through bet size is often good but here it's bad. I don't see it working.
we focus on players who are already winning and taking live poker seriously. we give all this content away for free to try to get players to a place where they’re already winning and ready for next step.
To your point, I think it's important to emphasize the need for a reliable toolbox of techniques and a strong self-awareness of one's own limitations. Develop an approach that works for you. It doesn't need to be complicated. Your mental decision tree doesn't need to look like the Tokyo subway map. Approach every single session and every single hand with a checklist and stick to it. Don't get out over your skis playing fancy. Be extremely mindful of your mental state. I know this all sounds cliche, but it's true.
I fail to see the logic of checking back on the flop. 1/4 pot bet isn’t much different than checking back but definitely provides additional information. It should play the same way as a check while picking up all the pots that never intended to continue.
Checking back closes the action on the flop, a min bet or 1/4 size bet gives villain another opportunity to act on flop where they may often check raise small bets here.
6:45 I don't get how why says there's no profitable second barrel. You can barrel with your gutshot and get folds from a seven, a deuce, and gut shots like 34, 35, 45 can't you? And they might float with some backdoors that would fold too. And checking flop opens the door for them to bluff you off.
Am I the only one who gets the cal scruby chess not checkers reference? (since it was Marc's former roommate) If you haven't heard the song you should check it out
I agree with checking back in position on the flop here. Not only do u get to see a free card, it screams u have a monster and u get to see how the out of position villian acts on the turn...People over cbet the flop wayyyy too much
I see these kinda vids a lot but I don’t know if they’re that helpful for live low stakes. I mean a lot of these players can have almost any two cards, making it impossible to put them on a range. In games where players show up with things like Q4o utg in 3bet pots, I haven’t found anything to help.
you’re right, they’re definitely not helpful for low stakes. i just put up 19 videos playing 300 hours at low stakes utilizing these strategies, and i lost my entire bankroll.
@ do you think we should try to put them on ranges at all at these stakes (2/2-1/2)? I honestly kinda take the approach of the novice (which I am) and just try to consider “would they do this with hands that I beat or no?” And that’s pretty much the extent of it, with the exception of some of the better players.
I have a great idea (I think) for a new series... X# of dollars/hour playing small stakes ONLINE poker. Would be easy to manage with the 👶. As well as entertaining, and a great resource of learning and experience for us all 🤓🤗
If they have the exact combo in their very wide range that is a brick wall they can just take our money. Also a lot of typical weak live players would donk lead Q7 on the river so its even less likely they have Q7.
I'M BACK...WE DID IT...OMG WE MISSED U SO MUCH...OMG BLESS U ! ! OMG U BIG LARGE BOY ! LARRY!!! HAPPY BIRTHDAY!! ITS LARRYS LUNCHTIME LENTILS ARE SOMETHING ! ! ! TUBBYTIME TUPPERWARE ! QUAINT CUTIE ! MY FAVORITE CHAPERONE ! I'M BAD AT SHIPPING ! SENEGALESE SNACKS I HAVE BECOME A SHERPA O WOW TIMOTHY HORTON ! I AM MORE PLUMP THAN THE AVERAGE HUMAN BOY ! EAT UR LITTLE TURKEY BITES ! ! NIBBLE ON MY TURTLES NECK ! I'M A ROFLER ! TUMULTUOUS TURKEY ! QUIBBLES ! LAST LITTLE NIBBLE ! 123 ROAST BEEF ! POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD ♠️ ♠️ ♠️
As a tournament player one thing your videos have taught me is to watch their turn bet/reraise/checkraise amounts and opponent's remaining SPR carefully to avoid putting yourself in unnecessary call/fold situations when they're signaling a river jam with their bet structure. (And on the flip side, how to structure those positions yourself.)
Excellent vid as always Marc, this answered a bunch of questions I had. The trolling of Lex again is the icing on the cake 😂
Haha the Lexo poker shot 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣Was thinking the same lol.
Damn lol I like Lex too
Haha why is he always needling Lex O?😂
Love the shot at Nit-O poker lololol
Lol gotta love Lex🤙📈
I must say, you make some of the best poker videos on youtube. The thought process you teach in these videos even works in online poker
🥰🥰
Great video Marc! Thanks for the breakdowns and thought process. The Lex O slights are *chef's kiss*
I’m waiting for the Lex O and Hungry Horse cage match fight
A heads up game would be excellent.
@@alanevans7451 I’d be so down for that
Lex velhuids and elky had a boxing match back in the day . Maybe a cage fight ?
I have Mark in a heads up poker match, but Lex is a former crossfit competitor and would probably lay Mark to waste in a boxing match. Let's get BOTH going!
@@bethesharkpoker Also, Lex was a collegiate wrestler, Mark would get smoked in cage match. However, Heads Up game would be fantastic.
Like the first hand explanation, where vs Fish we sometimes want to use larger bets when betting and attack their Turn X range, or their Turn probe range, but this can fall apart when we have no clue how to approach the River. Very simple explanation is just "plan ahead" and that requires some work + experience.
But I think this is the beauty of Poker, is we can go down many different nodes, especially when we're trying to exploit.
As a former chess player and a current poker player, I appreciate the encouragement to plan ahead. One small quibble, the king high flush draw doesn't "kind of" have pot odds. The pot odds are 23% (it's right there on your table) and the outs to a flush are 18%. That's not quite odds to call and doesn't win in the long run.
pot odds are for when all the money goes in. otherwise this is completely irrelevant. more money presumably goes in when we hit a flush.
Google "Implied odds poker"
implied odds i guess
@@hungryhorsepoker "pot odds are for when all the money goes in. otherwise this is completely irrelevant."
^^^This right here is next level brilliance!!!!!^^^
That is now in my poker Ten Commandments forever!
@@hungryhorsepoker Would love a future video to cover this, because I thought similar to @auntiesbeads on that specific hand! So clearly, I'm missing something😄 Thanks for another awesome video, btw! Love your content
Tx for your time educating about NLH cash. A question for you: In this video: "How I’d Make $100k in Poker, if I Had to Start Over" an example of R.F.I. with AKs in BTN send us to a Dry & Static board: A-7-2 rainbow. Why in that example the default flop action was to BET BIG or CHECK and with T-9s here the default flop action is to BET MEDIUM? As far as I understand your thought process for both cases, the BB Call in general is a signal of a wide range (we can generally eliminate AA, KK, AK, AQ, QQ, and JJ, some of the top of their range and some of the botton of their range).
Hope you and your family are safe from the fires!
I started seeing ur video since 5 days ,and its very helpful,
Can u do a video on speech play? I feel like you’re very talkative at the table and ask good questions to players in hand to get information!
Shots fired in the opening minute! LOL I LOVE this channel!
This is the best poker theory video that I have ever seen.
Hi
I know you have a 28 day bootcamp in February
But could you give me some information on your 7 day training option ?
This content is soooo good. 👏
0:30 shots fired!
Brilliant video. Only just come across your channel. Seems you’ve just completed a low stakes challenge. Will you do a video summarising your biggest low stakes tips you found over the year. Would be great to see as a new viewer
look at the video right before this one
really incredible content. love it.
Not one J92 flop. What has happened to poker!?!? I adjusted my strategy for 90% of flops to be J92 two spades.
There is our big boy again!
It's time to watch the best show on the planet.
👍👍👍👍❤❤❤❤
big boi time!
@@hungryhorsepoker 👍👍👍👍
Hey Marc! When can we expect to see you on hustlers Live Poker stream?
How do you deal with recs that don't give off sizing tells, I seem to face that a lot.
Do you think your strategy applies to an LA 5 5 $500 cap game that are usually action games but more like 100 to 150 bb deep.
Why don’t u go try it when u see fit. Poker is a Bayesian game and everything depends on circumstance. Certainly it would work against a few players but you’d have to make that decision and identify where this video is relevant.
I was just asking same abt 1/2 $300 cap games, often w opponents even less effective, rangy, but sticky w top pair. Just gotta tighten up a bit and can't use these big boy overbets as often unless they're scared money. Player & stack dependant.
At 16:30 I'm sorry but I think it's too optimistic to believe a rec is folding AK here when "all the draws miss"... I'd say most fish are tanking and cry-calling here. Like 65% are not folding AK here... With another Ace high board then yes, good strat, they probably fold TPTK. But that 98 of spades that doesnt complete... kills your bluff against fish I'd say. I think I saw one of the hands of his Low Stakes challenge in which that is exactly what happens to him and gets called...
completely agree. not sure if recs see it this way but with those sizings you're only repping sets and 98 so even a10 with all the missed draws is equivalent to ak and may want to call
Yup agree. Player dependent, but have seen some very light calls live. Also HH has no fold button. I'm OK folding many spots...
He's using 'reg' and 'fish' to describe weak players and targeting players capable of folding top pair, and plenty of fish are capable of doing this. But they're not calling stations --- they're a different kind of fish --- they'd have a subclass like 'rock' or 'weak passive' or 'weak-tight,' to distinguish the kind of mistakes they make and how to make money from them. You wouldn't do this against loose-aggressive or calling stations who you have seen call off with everything. But there are plenty of old dudes sitting out bomb pots set-mining happy to fold TPTK to aggression like this, they might even be winning players (against the calling stations) but they're exploitable by HH strategy.
@@dabluebery I think you are confusing Reg with Rec.
But maybe I'm confusing rec (capable of folding) with fish (a noob who has not evolved to rec yet). If that's the case and his strat was aimed at recs and not fish then Mark Goone may be right there too, as he is in almost everything
@@adagiotal5417 Edited my first comment for a typo -- rec is for recreational player, and I think Marc uses 'rec' mostly as a synonym for fish, someone exploitable for some reason or another as I went into above. I think a good video for Marc would be stereotyping the various rec types at low limit games. Reg would be someone less exploitable.
What did lexo do y’all? 😅
On the second example gto sometimes overbets here oop on the turn, do you think this is a bad play and just going for the check raise is better?
Genuinely the best free poker education anywhere.
2:25 why is the fold and 3 bet the same color? Why not make the three bet red?
You are A KING!!! Thank you as always. Great content.
As usual, great video.
Question: I used to play in games that played big but many stacks were too short for the game. The game was NL $1/$3 with a forced straddle button of $10 that needed to be played from the button or UTG [whichever came first].
Players bought in from as low as $300 and could match the largest stack. You like to point out how to act based on action and sizing but never really discuss the impact of effective stack size. A small bet compared to the pot might be a big chunk of a players stack.
Thinking you consider stack size as a bigger factor than pot size when gauging what a bet means but do not want to assume?
I felt cut off short on the KK river. Do you x/r river for value? Seems similar to the JJ all hearts board you had in a video.
Lexo always catching strays lol
He deserves it . I don’t follow him after his live at the lodge just a douche both streams . He’s rude af go back and watch and read comments. He’s a sore ass loser complaining the whole time . Not the first drama either with that dude.
In your argument for checkraising 76s on 983A (around the 17:00 mark) one of your key points is that your opponent can't call 2 barrels with AK or AQ because you've "told them twice in no uncertain terms" that those hands are no good. I disagree with this. When you checkraise a fish on the turn there, BB vs Button, you're telling them "I have an A." He's going to respond with "Oh yeah? Well I have a bigger ace" and then dig in his heels with his big aces and usually call your big boy river bet to prove to you that his ace is better.
I was thinking the exact same thing... It's absolutely player dependent, I don't try it with unknowns anymore 😂
Meh a lot will fold to such a big jam on the river after a massive raise on the turn. It's always important to identify the calling stations and trappers though, especially when using HHP strats. Just overbet for value against these villains and bluff small. This also applies when you've been caught bluffing big. If people are very willing to risk their entire 200+ bb stack with TPTK then it's easy to extract value.
@@ronnieplanter6402 I don't have an issue with the general bluffing ideas Marc endorses --- he always stresses how it's not logically consistent to think players will stack off with one pair when you're bluffing but not when you're value betting --- and he's right. I just think THIS particular situation is different. When they specifically have AK or AQ AND it's BB vs button AND the ace turns after the flop goes check check.
@@FGrimeson fair enough, I personally do think it's a profitable bluff in general, maybe slightly too little fold equity when they specifically have AK, but that's pretty player dependent i guess. On the other hand, I'm known for punting off stacks so what do I know lol
Agree with everyone here. Therefore I am betting very big when I have two pairs
Marc..Dan here. Like your videos. My question is the hand at 20 min where u flop an open ender. The villian bets weak and you say raise than bomb the turn. The first thing I thought of is many rec players won't just bet weak w 2nd or here but also draws. When you raise the villian won't fold his draws and even if u bomb the turn he won't fold his draws like straight draws or nfd. I'm not sure how much of his range is draws on qstsx board but I'm thinking a lot of his hands are draws. Can you address this? I don't usually raise boards like this oop because the villian has a lot of draws when he bets weak and there's not a lot of fold equity.
Jeebus...I've seen the light.. Thanks Marc & Hungry Horse.
Good video!
question about the bootcamp, don’t play live since my bankroll is only 3-4k atm (built it up crushing online low stakes 20/50nl) but I play like 50k hands a month online, should I apply or is it just live? I am a crusher (6k profit in 4 months of 50nl)
Bootcamp is geared toward live cash games. From the very little I know about online play it’s not likely to translate well.
The boot camp will def help improve your game but withdraw 1-2k from your online roll 1st and start playing some live 1/2 when you get the chance. It'll be much softer than games you're already beating plus you'll get more out of the bootcamp when you do take it. Not to mention, you'll more than likely run up that roll a bit so it'll soften the blow from the cost of the bootcamp
I like the guessing the range of the villains and the what if scenarios. This is gold content.
Savage Lexo jeez
i thought this was you big bet/check strategy. when would we use the big bet / frequency ??
Checking back allows us to gain more clairvoyance over a rec players range and we can play our hand closer to maxEV
Omg the Lex photo 😂 I hope it’s all in good fun, Lex seems like a pretty good guy lol
Your poker advice has saved me a lot of lamborghini tears !
What books you recommend
Mark this is very similar to calculation in chess, do you play any chess at all?
Did Lex dirty
I would like to see you executing this strategy in live games. I have some doubts.
Thanks to your videos, I've started to crush the Zoom tables on party. I had no clue how much 3-betting I could get away with because no one 4-bets
Not sure I agree with the analysis. First hand: if flop goes check / check, nobody except the most fishy opponent is going to bet big on the turn with a monster (set / 2 pairs). These hands are going to bet small to entice a call. And after being called, they would bet small on the river *again* hoping for a call or a bluff raise. The idea that people telegraph the strength of their hand through bet size is often good but here it's bad. I don't see it working.
No way the flop was A72🌈 it should be J92
Look at that sweet baby
Marc can we get more session vlogs?
I love how you rook a ahot at lex....i really dont like that guy
The king has posted 🗣️
Lex is such a tool. Always hostile. Angry. Whining. Excellent choice for the novice depiction
LexO catching strays 🤣🤣
Thanks a lot, you are the best
Do you have a course for low limit beginner live?
we focus on players who are already winning and taking live poker seriously. we give all this content away for free to try to get players to a place where they’re already winning and ready for next step.
What's considered a "big" bet on the turn by the villain? anything over 50% pot? 66% or more?
Marc I hope you know how to defend a double leg take down 😂
What is this? Pappa Marc is looking well rested.
To your point, I think it's important to emphasize the need for a reliable toolbox of techniques and a strong self-awareness of one's own limitations. Develop an approach that works for you. It doesn't need to be complicated. Your mental decision tree doesn't need to look like the Tokyo subway map. Approach every single session and every single hand with a checklist and stick to it. Don't get out over your skis playing fancy. Be extremely mindful of your mental state. I know this all sounds cliche, but it's true.
lol best people to choose as novice and crusher...Omgclayaiken legend
What’s with the Lexo beef? You been on his back for a minute now lol.
mad marc is back 2025!!!!!
omg
@@hungryhorsepoker thats what ill be staying when you are back on HCL again :) its long over due.
I fail to see the logic of checking back on the flop. 1/4 pot bet isn’t much different than checking back but definitely provides additional information. It should play the same way as a check while picking up all the pots that never intended to continue.
You could also min bet .
Checking back closes the action on the flop, a min bet or 1/4 size bet gives villain another opportunity to act on flop where they may often check raise small bets here.
@@DeclanTurner-v9c That's why you need to plan ahead if you are going to reopen the action.
Can u teach us how to play 4 card game ,in our club they play 4 card and I lost a lot in 4 card ❤ Love from India
Lexo roast, lmao
Reads thumbnail:Does this apply to candy too?
This UA-cam channel explains poker so well that it should be protected by UNESCO as an educational world treasure! 😁
6:45 I don't get how why says there's no profitable second barrel. You can barrel with your gutshot and get folds from a seven, a deuce, and gut shots like 34, 35, 45 can't you? And they might float with some backdoors that would fold too. And checking flop opens the door for them to bluff you off.
Am I the only one who gets the cal scruby chess not checkers reference? (since it was Marc's former roommate) If you haven't heard the song you should check it out
omg never thought anyone would get it!
😂poor lexo
Everytime I XR the turn I get called with a worse than what I’m representing. These god dam sticky fish bro
How do you think through this fast enough to not spend minutes per decision?
Study, study, study
Damn boss, what's your beef with lexo lol
The problem is this theory might only work on rec players if that.
Lexo 😂
I agree with checking back in position on the flop here. Not only do u get to see a free card, it screams u have a monster and u get to see how the out of position villian acts on the turn...People over cbet the flop wayyyy too much
LMAO @ lex o as novice
How much does the boothcamp cost?
Still spots left?
@@lisaluckman4K last I heard, but so worth it if you’re ready
Whats the beef between this dude and lexo?
Don’t tap the glass !!!
I see these kinda vids a lot but I don’t know if they’re that helpful for live low stakes. I mean a lot of these players can have almost any two cards, making it impossible to put them on a range. In games where players show up with things like Q4o utg in 3bet pots, I haven’t found anything to help.
you’re right, they’re definitely not helpful for low stakes. i just put up 19 videos playing 300 hours at low stakes utilizing these strategies, and i lost my entire bankroll.
@ do you think we should try to put them on ranges at all at these stakes (2/2-1/2)?
I honestly kinda take the approach of the novice (which I am) and just try to consider “would they do this with hands that I beat or no?” And that’s pretty much the extent of it, with the exception of some of the better players.
All the professionals in every hobby plays chess and not checkers.
Except professional checkers players, they play checkers, not chess ♟️
SRP Btn v Bb and you give Bb range AK and AQ? I dont think so bro.
Man. I like poker. Not homework
I have a great idea (I think) for a new series... X# of dollars/hour playing small stakes ONLINE poker. Would be easy to manage with the 👶. As well as entertaining, and a great resource of learning and experience for us all 🤓🤗
Poor Lexo. Do you have some sort of beef with him? You could have picked Rampage or Mariano (or really almost any other vlogger).
Where is my J92 😡
You are supposed to river the straight silly
On that specific river, they could have some Q7s, especially Q7cc.
If they have the exact combo in their very wide range that is a brick wall they can just take our money. Also a lot of typical weak live players would donk lead Q7 on the river so its even less likely they have Q7.
@@catherinewilde4806 Ya fair point.
if he is halfway good he doesnt fold KJ kq qj with backdoors
🔥🔥
This is a gold mine
I'M BACK...WE DID IT...OMG WE MISSED U SO MUCH...OMG BLESS U ! ! OMG U BIG LARGE BOY ! LARRY!!! HAPPY BIRTHDAY!! ITS LARRYS LUNCHTIME LENTILS ARE SOMETHING ! ! ! TUBBYTIME TUPPERWARE ! QUAINT CUTIE ! MY FAVORITE CHAPERONE ! I'M BAD AT SHIPPING ! SENEGALESE SNACKS I HAVE BECOME A SHERPA O WOW TIMOTHY HORTON ! I AM MORE PLUMP THAN THE AVERAGE HUMAN BOY ! EAT UR LITTLE TURKEY BITES ! ! NIBBLE ON MY TURTLES NECK ! I'M A ROFLER ! TUMULTUOUS TURKEY ! QUIBBLES ! LAST LITTLE NIBBLE ! 123 ROAST BEEF ! POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD ♠️ ♠️ ♠️
i will bathe u in spinach
@hungryhorsepoker NOW THAT'S WHERE A LINE HAS BEEN CROSSED 😱😱😱
deleted comment - found answer 😅
Hell yeah
My mom told me not to watch your videos. (She doesn’t want to see me build a big stack). What should I tell her to change her mind?
Oh my
UNC marc please new series.