The president of Pixar is so real for saying this
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- It is good to know big studios are trying to keep artists in the process
🔥75% OFF Animation Courses🔥www.21-draw.com/?rfsn=7215242...
🔥Follow on IG🔥 bit.ly/2AMn4Mq
📚 Your Animated Journey📚 gumroad.com/a/345371763/niOpH
It covers everything from Reels to Resumes and interviews! It’s essential to learn the ins and outs of the industry!
Links:
Jim Morris interview:
• Pixar President Jim Mo...
Sam Register Interview:
• Company Town Executive... - Фільми й анімація
Now say you wont outsourse too!! lol
🦀Arr me boy, I outsourced all my work to korea and india! Arr arrr arrr arr arr 🦀
He's not 85, is his age a running joke or something? He's not even 70.
Miyazaki legit lost his faith in humanity when he was shown AI animation for the first time.
Open source and public domain. We need more GPL and GNU softwares away from close source softwares and the internet at present.
We need to trust the community that we have to work with LAN servers for local animations and forward porting to keep our community local both digitally and personally.
That misrepresents a huge portion of the situation. The much more pressing issue Miyazaki took with the animation was that it was a monster that resembled a man he personally knew who struggled with nonfunctioning limbs. He would probably be as insulted by seeing a crawling Headcrab Zombie Torso as he would the creature that moved using an algorithm.
Not defending AI animation in the slightest, but I hate it when the internet plays telephone to fit their perspective. Like when people bring out Miyazaki’s “anime was a mistake” when he was talking about how anime in the 50s was so much better, or when people invented Miyamoto saying “a delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game will be forever bad”.
That was part of it, but saying that is all is also misrepresenting a part of the situation, they also say yes our goal is to make a software that can draw like a human and Miyazaki says we are losing confidence in ourselves if we need machines to do everything@@johnclark926
@@johnclark926 no - he was talking about that being the effect of using ai - that it didn't understand humanity. His reference was still about ai - not just that result or shot. In context, he's talking about ai.
The insult to life itself is SQUARELY and ENTIRELY about ai.
That is not how a director gives feedback for a shot - period.
This attempt to flip what he was talking about as if it was just feedback on that shot is not convincing in the least.
I dont blame him. There's been nothing an onslaught of mediocrity and soulless images with AI
random discord notification sounds in the video should deserve a report alone lol
yeah honestly, I wish people would cut that shit out! I use discord for work and this is SO ANNOYING!
exactly what i was thinking
As a former Pixar employee in the 1990's, there was so much hype that "animation will be done faster as computers get faster and technology improves."
Nope.
What happened was we spent the same amount of time and human labor making a movie, _we just made them better._
Technology was used to simplifiy some steps so time and attention could be spent, instead, on making the movie look better, feel better, and the story more polished and developed.
I'm now looking at the game industry, and what I see is when ordinary people have access to high quality tools, you can have full games made by a couple people with an idea.
You get more games, not less.
More work, not less.
I think animation will be the same - more people will be able to realize their vision with tools that give them more power to express themselves.
What do you think about Sora? Because that is the one example of ai for movies that actually “scared” me.
@@martin231181 gl making original ideas with abstract characters to tell your story
I dunno, I'm somewhat of a luddite myself when it comes to this topic. I hope you're right though.
@@DeletedDevilDeletedAngel That’s about lack of control of the output, but dont you think that it’s a matter of time before you can simply give it image inputs and it will follow it exactly?
More work but for less money. As supply exceeds demand the value of the work decreases. Video and image content on social media is an example of this. Most artists feel obligated to create what should be thousands of dollars worth of images or video content to post on social media for absolutely nothing, in order to attract an audience who may, hopefully, one day buy something or commission the artist. This is only going to get worse with AI. A dwindling number of lucky artists will still be required to perform the work for studios that teams of artists formerly did.
sure 3d didn't kill 2d animation more like giant companies like Disney replacing most 2d animated movies for america in general
Show some restraint 😒
Disney isn't The Whole world,
Anime is slowly taking over in America, and it's 2d animated.
i can't find the exact number, but i think Disney Animation might get clawed from behind by Anime,
given their Growth today.
even on Netflix shows like Attack on Titan gain a Mainstream popularity,
and UA-camr, Streamer, heck even Mr Beast talked about Anime all the time.
@@jensenraylight8011 And not to mention Anime isn’t necessarily and inherently 2D (I'm looking at you FFVII AC and Lupin III The First and Resident Evil Death Island) I really wish they would stop this type of moral panic to be honest I do understand many things change but reactions like that are ridiculous.
@@jensenraylight8011 I didn't say Disney is the whole world.I said companies "like" Disney. i didn't add Netflix i'm just talking about how most of western mainly America's animated movies that are release theatrically are mostly 3d animated movies.the only time 2d animated movies are made its either it on a streaming service or outside the united states like anime and certain series.
I hear some 2D film made in the US are making their way to theaters
I think the issue is presented poorly. AI won't replace all the artists, AI will cut some big portion of them out of the industry.
I am 3D character artist and AI won't do my job, but literally half of the reference I receive is AI now, I've seen multiple AI images on the product in the market, I've seen them on marketplaces, I've seen them sold as image pack or books, all of that is someone's job that was taken by AI.
Big issue I see is developing new blood, entry level in the art industry was already crazy without AI, but now it might be even worse.
Senior artist at Pixar or Blizzard is safe, but 17 year old dude that doing commission for 10$ can't compete with AI, so who will be a Senior artist in 20 years?
Also 3D animation and 3D in general is the safest, since it is the most challenging thing for current AI.
😂 yea the stuff that is made out of numbers in a computer is hard for a computer to do?! what are you on mate. I'd argue that 3D is the least safe as no one can distinguish any human touch in 3d from cpu made 3d unlike with 2d images.
Great insight. Thank you.
@@kreativeforce532 I am yet to see anything remotely close to something usable.
The issue with 3D is the following, there is much less reference for Ai, you may pack download millions of images but doing the same with 3D is impossible, there are very little free 3D models in comparison and they are vastly harder to download. Production models are just impossible to get in big numbers.
Second, 3D has no usable interface, you need very certain things for 3D and Ai is very bad at producing that, you can't just type "give me a sexy elf" and get something usable.
So, I think at best 3d AI will be able to make some basic props, maybe some sculpts, but nothing close to exact game character for example.
Also everything inside PC is math LOL, including images, text and video
here the thing, if all the references you saw was AI images, it's because either you follow AI images or give it an engagement,
enough so that the feeds kept recommending you that.
just ignore it, or else worse, your Art will look like AI Art.
also, AI Artstyle is Converging into one Monoculture, one single Artstyle.
i don't know why this is happenning, but it's.
if you already saw enough AI images, i think you noticed this too.
there are a lot of youtuber out there resort to using AI Images instead of using real footage, or 2d Mograph,
guess what? their Videos got tanked hard, literally they get 90% less Traffic.
why? because people mistaken their video as Tiktok quick cashgrab motivation AI Video.
people can't distinguish one AI video from Another AI videos.
this is Average people we're talking about, and they can distinguish it.
AI is becoming like a Spam, and once people get spammed by AI Art a couple of time, they just ignore anything that resembled AI made.
therefore, that's why Art Direction is very important,
and AI can't or hard to Art Direct,
Prompt alone can't Art Direct anything, and AI is Highly Unreliable & Uncertain.
why would you want to compete with AI and making yourself look like a Spam Art in the process?
Do you think that People are stupid enough to want to watch something made by AI overnight?
Just because someone sell something using AI, doesn't mean they're making any money,
nor it validates that people want to buy stuff made by AI
and i'm a AAA Game Artists myself.
@@jensenraylight8011 Hi, man, ty for stating your opinion.
I mostly agree with that, but has to make a couple of corrections.
When I said "I receive reference" I meant reference that clients send me.
Everything about AI art being poorly received is partially true, but not entirely.
I am really glad that people generally dislike AI. But they moslty dislike in the art context, I rarely see people complaining about AI thumbnails on youtube or add\stock images.
Also not all AI looks like one style, there is quite a bit of AI that looks really good and much harder to distinguish. I talked about it with multiple pro artists and they all say that they pretty often has to actively search for Ai artifacts to confirm their suspicion. So for general public not familiar with art this would be very hard.
And AI is still getting better, I can see the world where general public won't be able to distinguish "Good" AI art in the near future.
Again I don't think that artist will die as a profession, but I think AI will take a lot of art related jobs that don't really require a lot of artistic expression, but require mass production of pretty images and it happens to some extent already.
How much is a good question, that is unpredictable, I think 20-50%, but that just rough numbers that feel correct for me, no one knows for sure.
What are you working on btw, if that is not under NDA?
Art in general, and animation in particular, just cannot lose the human touch. Pure and simple.
they dont just spawn, human generates them. L take.
😂Just dey play
Bravo, Jim Morris and Sam Registar! Their words are a much-needed source of re-assurance!
I don't agree. The majority of the 2d animators lost their jobs in the States when the 3d trend came along. Sure, people will be needed to manage ai, but that doesn't mean that artists will keep their jobs. I highly recommend the documentary Pencil vs Pixel.
Pencil is just the goat 🐐
I can only see clips of it on YT, has it been fully released yet?
So far, ai hasn't replaced the artist. It has only made our jobs easier and faster.
AI won't replace artists because AI corporations needs someone to steal from for training AI.
Next week's headlines: Pixar announces 25% of its animators are being laid off to be replaced with Pixar's new proprietary AI animator suite that's secretly been in development for the last 32 minutes.
No AI can learn from internet Access, using all pictures and drawing here. Why pay someone if sources are free and available
Artists can boost their workflow with the right tools. Take Zbrush, for example, which Stan Winston Studios adopted to great effect. While AI can certainly enhance an artist's abilities, it's important to note that a skilled artist who uses AI will always outperform an amateur. Unlike an amateur, a talented artist sees AI as a tool to surpass limitations, not a crutch to rely on.
@@boitenormal8187 Sounds like royalty checks and licensing income to me. Passive income here we come!
Even more they need writers, good writers who can develop good characters and unique plots
There is still a difference between the previous tech jumps, with 2D to 3D, Mocap, etc. Those are still skilled jobs. An artist can learn and upgrade their skills. AI is skill-less and anyone with a keyboard is an "artist/animator" now. We'll see where this goes, but for a while there'll be so much AI generated garbage on youtube. I'm thinking it'll make people sick of it, overloaded by it that we'll have a people looking for other type of media to absorb. Like actual real world plays and shows, even movie theaters might blow up. Things that actually involve human interaction. Internet will be so much noisier that there'll be people that want a break from it.
So you're basically referring to the dead internet theory, where there will be so much AI and bot slop plaguing the web that most people will either never be able to interact or find another person they haven't already been in contact with or everyone will abandon the web because of the artificial mob. I hate to think the one thing that brought people from around the world together will cause us to lose those long distance connections, but on the bright side, the sense of physical community will return and people will be meeting face to face again. I'm all for more physical human interaction, I just hate the sacrifice that it will most likely cost.
They're just telling us what we all want to hear as artists, kinda like the Titanic's captain calming people down to hide the impending reality
I don't think AI is good enough to be hidden like that though... I don't know
I look at it like this.
McDonald's is the most successful food service brand in existence. It is global, relatively fast, convenient, inoffensive, and cheap. No matter how good you are at cooking, no matter how fresh and tasty your ingredients are, and no matter how unique and intense your spices are, you will never beat McDonald's.
But I will never go to McDonald's for Thai food.
I will never want Italian food from McDonald's.
I can recommend places if you want Chinese, Japanese, Korean, French, Mexican, Brazilian, Mongolian, American, Irish, Turkish, etc, and not one of them will ever be McDonald's.
McDonald's, like AI, cater to people who don't care.
That's actually a fair way to think about ai's development and its effects. Like how McDonald's is the food you get if you need food, if you're looking for food that has passion. heart and actually tastes better than cardboard mass produced slob, you go to a nice and/or local restaurant. AI will never be as good as actual people when it comes to art, it just makes it easier for non artists or corporations to mass produce slop, only difference is, no one's gonna eat that shit lol.
and now imagine u can create a fastfood restaurant of any type of cuisine by training an AI to do it
AI is versatile and that will cause a lot of artists to be cut and the rest would need to charge less in order to compete with cheap AI art
"People used to say 3D would replace traditional 2D animation" -- what a horrifying example to lead with. It's not gone, but it's a rare find these days.
Never say never money will change everything.
A.I. art won’t steal our job, but when artists will use it instead of bashing it and when A.I. art will improve, A.I. will be an unstoppable tool if it’s in the right hands.
I like how lots of people on this video are saying this. Usually I only hear people saying that the world will end because AI art is forever bad and will replace humans entirely
@@eglol I agree… Everyone I see talking about AI on UA-cam and Twitter think it’s the worst thing in the world and that all our jobs will vanish 🫠
Why are there random Discord ping sounds? You forget to turn off desktop audio when recording?
Uff! ❤ Thx for this video :)
Always put human work first, and AI work second
Finally people on top looking out for us
I'm an independent 2D animator.
He is right, mostly because with all those new gadgets, tools, technologies and what not...
You still need someone to make them feel more human, relatable and emotional.
Without a proper human eye, all you'll get are stiff projects that speak to no one.
Like with all the other tools, A.I is just another one... It can't replace the artist that actually knows how to use it all to create something coherent and impactful.
They need some god damn writers too, because they are droppin the ball lately.
I think these guys forget or ignore the business side of things as well as the practical economics. Companies love hiring people or under paying them to increase profits. They do this dispute risk to the quality of their business or craft…. Boeing is an example. The presence of AI may reduce the artists needed by the big firms but allow for smaller productions to have more capability but due to consolidation of big media the professional industry may still shrink due to continued mergers and you end up seeing more passion projects that each don’t make as much money on places like UA-cam. Or AI could just increase expectations and work load on the existing artist/ professionals without a change in pay where perhaps there would have been more individuals hired in the company before. the question of whether there are less animators might be hard to answer then.
Lol "hasn't really replaced 2D Animation"? Hmm I beg to differ, well not totally, but it has pretty much replaced it on the big studios.
Same logic applied to the use of Xerox back in the 60s, allot of ink and paint artists were let go, but a very small amount were used still in some studios and projects.
AI won't be replacing animadors yet, but you rest assured it is already replacing content creators, copywriters, designers and book illustration for example.
Then it'll replace conceptual artists, and step by step will replace others as well.
This affects not just artists but other professionals and jobs.
I can't see AI replacing traditional stop motion animation though, but 2D and CGI animation? In 15/20 years that's what is prob gonna happen unless government acts fast and imposes legislation that will limit the uses of AI in the workplace, if not, that's where we are headed unfortunately.
CEOs and stakeholders ONLY care about profit, having robots and AI replacing humans increases widely their margins of profit, and if you think they won't care about making more and more money because they want to protect people and artistic integrity you are absolutely delusional.
That's why we need government to impose limits on a capitalistic driven society. And my faith in government is also not the highest.
AI will absolutely replace humans in allot of their jobs, artists included. I'm an artist myself and I'm very heartbroken to see these things happening, but unless something takes place to prevent this from getting worse, it'll be just a matter of time.
you cant make ai animate in 2 dimensions... it will always try to copy one angle which may appear 3D or a weird high on drugs looking "thing" AI wont be making good 2D animations soon for a long time since you have to train it to deal with the difference between 3D and 2D
Sadly, I have to agree 😭
Why did i felt like choosing art as my passion and dream job right in this era, when this happens
@@Nerii_75 it’s not even gonna do anything, it can only make unoriginal art. If you learn how to create anything your heart desires it’s better than ai
This is why RenderMan and Moonray is open source. It’s because we are the animators that Pixar and DreamWorks need.
But not only just that, many indie and group studios need open source to keep traditional and digital animation alive.
We need to archive as we animate. Make new assets with each frame on paper to put in digital animations programs and beat AI to the punch with our own machine learning programs.
You sir are my hero
It's just another tool in the tool box. Creativity will always need a human touch.
Lost like tears in the ocean. To wake up is to replace hope with determination to deal with whatever may come. It's time to realise the world is bigger than we thought and very often not as we'd like it to be.
differance is those past technologies didnt literally do the work on its own, it all needed people to run ti and then make use of it, whereas ai art gen does, and needs far fewer inputs from a human.
ultimately the sheer amount of time, work and costs saved will trump any greater degree of qualtiy a human artist has over an ai that just needs a little touch up to use
the guy from Warner bros. really said "as an animation company We protect the artist and the artform" bro its not like WB deleted tons of shows off of their Streaming service, has deleted Cartoon Network and deleted or canceled multiple movie and shows????? Where was he when that happened?
They said the same thing about self service checkouts to cashiers, and nowadays, you don't even need a self-service checkout if you go to an Amazon shop.
Few days ago i couldn't use self service because my ginger was too tiny to weight it(
Thank goodness, that's some small relief at least
As a fan of animation, thank you.
100%. Ai will never replace humans in the art field, and i will never consume movies or games made by ai. I want human touch, simple as that
Disney: A & I is the begining and core of "ARTIST"
Remove the RT and ST in "ARTIST" and you get?
AI-
Words are different than action
"It hasn't replaced 2D animation, it still exists" yes but it definitely did affect the demand
The issue isn’t how much ai can do today but what it will be capable of tomorrow. 3d animation can’t be compared since it still took a comparable amount of time and skill to generate the animation.
The tricky is not giving the entry level work to AI. As an executive, it will be a hard sell.
AI is not gonna replace animators working for feature films, but it sure can satisfy a lot of customers for all the freelancers out there
Now if only Bob Iger would stop telling us to 'embrace' AI.
I believe in term of animation movies it can take down Disney if Netflix and WB use it and make moves for all type of ages rather than only for children and early teens
It won't replace artists, but it definitelly replaced writers. There is no way a human actually wrote Wish.
It's not about what they say, it's about how they act on it. It's all good giving empty platitudes. Let's see if they (or their executives) will refrain from cutting jobs.
What people don't understand is, creating ai art is also Difficult and time consuming. There is also difficulties in securing copyright issues.
If an AI "artist" files a job application all they're really doing is recommending the production team some software instead of hiring them because you don't need an extra person to use a text prompt.
I do however think AI could be useful in pre-production for rapid brainstorming as an intermediary step between mood boards and concept art made by an artist where the artist might have an idea and could use an AI to generate an image to get an idea of how that might look to save time on making concept art for an idea that gets thrown out at that stage or to find details to add more meat to a more abstract concept.
amazing video and inspiring, ai is great but thats just another tool nothing more introduced... we had painters then photography came but that didnt wipe out painting added more value to it, same as 3d is amazing but 2d frame by frame has something that just makes it shine hence anime has maintained to 2d
A good comparison to make is peoples reactions to the first calculators. Most thought that it would change math forever and ruin peoples abilities to do math in their head and on pen and paper. While calculators did change math dramatically, it didnt replace mathematicians, but became a tool to do things faster. This is what I presume will happen with AI.
CGI did replace most 2D animation, though, at least for feature films.
the biggest thing to realize about ai art is that, it cant make creative decisions. even if the creation of art were to be completely replaced by ai, you would still need an honest to god artist sitting there making sure it's making the best thing it can. ai also isnt good at fine tuning a design, so you'd probably save time and money hiring an active artist to at minimum, take an ai generated piece and refine it into something better. if there's one thing ai is good at, it's heavy lifting. think of it like heavy machinery in construction. it enables workloads not possible with just people, but it's expensive and not good at the precision stuff, plus it still needs human guidance
I think there will be artists but the jobs will be merged creating full stack animators
I mean, 3D kinda replaced 2D, at least when it comes to animated movies, it's freakin rare to see a 2D animated movie for decades now.
1:25 bro you have bo odea what your taking about, working as with motion capture is just a techbical clean up, it requires the same skills, but its a whole diffrent thing then actual animating
If anything, we might just do the same thing we always do, and find new ways to incorporate this technology into the creative process.
I'm sure some companies will like things to stay traditional. But it just means even more competition and only the elite will get taken. Lesser companies will just use ai to make quick products. New artists, unless they're insanely talented will get brushed aside.
the thing is u have to be really good now to not starve
I meannnnn, to be fair, a lot more 3D movies are being created by these big businesses than it seems like 2D, especially compared to hand drawn works.
bro why you putting discord notification sounds in the video?
It's very interesting that CG created a completely new genre? So what's different for Ai? Ai will integrate into all aspects of creativity and life, as a tool.
People like 'oh no its gonna take jobs'. Maybe.. But maybe it wont. With increased productivity and less hands needed on a particular task, the reduced cost of labor in time and manpower will absolutely allow for more projects to run simultaneously with the same amount of people. We only Lose jobs if the production companies decide for whatever reason not to increase productivity despite the massive jump in efficiency. I dont see any companies doing that. Why not make 3 films in the time you could have made one with the same number of people? And the highly skilled artists will be the ones being paid the big bucks to fix and fine tune the ai assisted work for final approval.
I mean it's complicated, when you said 2D wasn't replace by 3D animation, technically that might be true but it did happend because of producers and the continous search of making more money: Disney stopped making 2D animations because the public was more intrigued by the 3D animations therefore, people were less going to the 2D animations but it didn't mean they loved them less, yet Dinsey was loosing money so they stopped making 2D. With AI, producers have a way to make stuff easy and cheap, so if they have at least a consideration for art, creativity and job well-done, then I hope they will use AI as a tool and not as a replacement, but then again, it's a hope.
Yeah true, but the thing about AI is that is makes all of it automatically, atleast with CGI and Mocap it’s still entirely done by humans, just using different tools from 2D animation, but with AI it makes all by himself without human input, and that’s why it’s actually different and scarier than the other revolutionary tools.
I feel as if there is a fair chance, that AI won't replace artists. It's cheaper, sure, especially as soon as you have some very good programs to make your "art" with, but I feel as if it's obvious, that the authenticity will be missed. For the machine, it's easy to get a prompt and do what they're told, but it's way more impressive if real human beings do it. Many things have become easier, machines have overtaken a lot of things and with that comes quite a lot of things that are artsy but mass production. For example, dinnerware. You get some gorgeous plates and cups at some places, and they are produced in masses, which the machine helped with. Still, we don't think, wow, how cool it is, that the machine made this, we just think "oh, pretty plate". It's different, too, when we see something handmade, where you can see the effort and uniqueness of it. I also would pay more for something handmade, than for something that is made by machine. Some might say "well then they will just pretend as if it's made by hand and not by ai" but people will become suspicious, and it will lead to ways people will make sure people know it really is handmade.
I also like to add, that there will be use of AI in the future and for a while, people will try to use AI as a way of replacing employees, but people will get tired of it. The good thing about AI however, is that people with blockades or a need of ideas get to have some help with that. You want to have a concept of how something should look, like, if you write a book and want it visualized, then you can do that. I think, as long as it's only used as an aid, it's fine. Idk though
AI and CGI will be the atrophied corpse of creativity.
well Disney and other did stop or significantly reduce 2D animation productions.
3D is inevitable now even in the Anime industry who mainly produce 2D.
Give it time and Ai will just do the same if not more.
Eh, I doubt ai will be used by companies. Too much backlash
Dude, plenty of companies already do.
@@Tainira94they will soon find out the amount of resourses it takes to run a powerfull AI. the best resourse at your disposal is the human resources. you get s fully funacitoning electromechanical system that works on food and that with the right manipulation and distopian brainwashing can be bent to your needs. you dont need a lot of manufacturing, iots easy to farm and you only need an ideology to guide it.
There’s a fundamental difference between the past and AI now you still need humans other than the guy in the motion capture suit. 2D animation is still a thing yes but it’s used less and less now but even 3D you still need people. AI isn’t good enough as humans YET but IT WILL GET THERE SOONER THAN YOU THINK! I mean we all remember Sora coming out right? And even though the final product isn’t as good as humans what Sora can do in hours or even minutes takes humans many of them working days even weeks to do! AI is already faster and cheaper than humans ten fold! It’s RAPIDLY getting better in quality! So eventually in a decade or two AI will become just as good as humans the key difference between the other technologies and AI is AI doesn’t require humans to work the AI doesn’t need animators motion capture and 3D animation dose!
No john lassator, no pixar
why did you put random discord notifications in this video?
85 and he looks that good?
Thats What IM Saying!
The main difference between AI and People who use ai art are usually writers, not visual artists who usually have very little knowledge of making art look striking, thus, each frame will be at worst, inconsistent and at best, tread the uncanny valley. I say this because actual artists are looking to expand their own skills as artists and would never resort to using ai as a shortcut. They may use it for comparison or for fun, but never authentically abd without authenticity from professional artists, ai is doomed.
The only thing AI will never have is a soul
And having a soul is how creativity is done in a way that caters to others that have souls
85!?!?👍🏽
The problem with AI content isn't it replacing people. A tool is just a tool. The problem is all the inherent theft that's built into these tools right now, and the impossibility of removing that theft.
GYAAAAAAAAT
I knew he'd hate AI just like me.
Who is the girl in the black motiion capture outfit....she awesome
A.I will be making our video games, music and movies very soon thoo….i give it 10 to 15 years
You do know Disney's 2D animation department was shut down after Princess and the Frog, right?
Bro has anybody seen wish 🤞
A.I. won’t replace you if you know how to use it.
Pixar films are already influenced more by marketing teams than artists, so it's not like they actually care about that aspect.
Instead of fighting AI, how about we learn from it to discover which errors need to be fixed in animation like references or finding new animation techniques like better lighting, contrast and even colour mixes that won’t ruin the original work but improve upon them
Unfortunately it doesn’t matter what he says, it only matters what the money says.
there are only 1 % artist working on this giant company, and all other company dont seek that kind of work ethic they need quality, speed and cheap which is Ai
honestly, A.I should be illegal, this isnt just some new tech thats useful for one thing..... shit is ruining peoples lives to a point.
I could see AI perhaps replacing some concept artists. I certainly wouldn't worry about AI replacing animators or modelers any time soon. When AI tries to make an actual scene, it invariably looks like some weird, inconsistent fever dream. Having said that, I do think that some day, AI will be able to create detailed 3d models that could then be rigged and animated. Even still, I think it's always going to be more difficult to explain an idea to an AI and have it produce desired, consistent results, than a human being.
Next president : AI will replace animators.
Things can change. He is just a man, not a truth.
1:08. You’re welcome
Jim Morris' words may be reassuring, but keep in mind the man is 85! What about the next person who comes in to take control of the Pixar reins? Will they have the same sympathy and respect for artists as Jim?
Waitasec - Didn't WB just cut their Animation Dept & Staff to almost ZERO recently?!?!? Am I wrong n ths???
But....Disney already opened and hired people for positions in A.I at their studios...
It's just a matter of time.
they probably use AI software for simulations and stuff. i hope/doubt disney is using AI for generative stuff
1 minute 1 view. Popping off.
AI singing: "Our day will come" or "You ain't seen nothing yet. "The best is yet to come." or "Somewhere over the rainbow, blue moons rise."
I don't think the same is with AI. Think about it, artists are actually losing jobs and you have to zoom in on a photo to even tell if its AI or not.
As a 2D concept artist. I'm out of my job. 😊
AI will replace artists only in case if people would want that. As soon as they would vote by dollar for AI art it will replace real world artists
Him and others trying to calm people down still underestimate what is coming. AI today and AI 2 to 5 years from now will be wildly different beasts. Try to consider the capabilities of AI as an exponential growth curve. We are now most likely near a point at which the curve has barely left the X axis and the technological jumps of the last year have already been dazzling to say the least. It won't be long until many people in this and other industries won't be able to get a Job anymore. CEOs included by the way