Oh man that shuffle is soooooo bold and brave. I love it. Screw a zarrow I'm just gonna put the packet back on top 😅😅 I absolutely LOVE it. Definitely going to be using this from time to time now thanks!!!
The spectator doesn't actually have to multiply with 9, because any combination that becomes a multiple of 9 will work, like 3x3, 6x3, or 6x6 and it doesn't matter the order they put these numbers in, they could start by pressing 6, multiply it with a bunch of other numbers before they multiply with 3.
Nathan I love your videos and tricks I watch your videos all the time and I learn them very quickly and then I do them on my family and they freak out and they say that one is so good and I say thanks to a million card tricks
Billy are you still a fan of the Gaffer? I have not seen your comments on peters channel in a long time. Just wondered. Hope everything id going fine for you!! Take care. My friend. Gary in dreamland. Have a nice dream!!🙂🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Hello brother The trick is great and so is the explanation But the matter does not need all this complexity. You can just keep the card in the specified place, for example in the 27th arrangement, and go to the calculator and type 27 + 0 x (the viewer can choose any number x any number x any number again) and the result will be . 27 No matter how different the numbers And I am very sorry, I do not mean to amend, I mean to help as you always help me ❤
I appreciate your thinking, but I’m afraid your idea simply makes no sense lol. Imagine if a spectator typed in 3x6x9x7x4x5 and hit equals and saw the answer was 27. Anyone who passed 3rd grade level math would know that’s completely incorrect. Even if you limit them to choosing any two numbers, most people know their times tables memorized. If they typed in 7x8 = 27, most people would agree that looks odd.
@@AMillionCardTricksI was trying to see the rationality in his explanation but with all due respect it would only work on small children like 6 or younger 😅
when i was watching i was like "wait is he not shuffling the cards or something?" but i just thought you were doing that but still pushing the cards together to sort of shuffle it
if you add up digits of 18 or 27 or 36, you get a 9. so you don't need any duplicates. why complicate things. just ask them to add up all digits of the multiplied number
@@tomi71 I would advise against that for two reasons. One, it adds an extra mathematical step which can tire the spectators attention span (I know its just simple addition, but its just more streamlined if you have them total the initial answer's digits and stop there.) And the second reason is that method would literally reveal the trick. If the spectators were curious and wanted to test the trick out again for themselves on a calculator, they would reveal the fact that 9 will always be a forced outcome and the trick is ruined. The fact that I leave at least 3 options in my version makes it more difficult for them to backtrack (even if they find out its always 3 numbers, then how could it have been a direct hit...?)
Great card at any number!! Can performer still show or display faces of cards at beginning of effect without spectator noticing the three kings?? If not then performer could just use a deck with only all kings; therefore it is necessary to display cards at beginning!! Gary in dreamland. Have a nice dream!!🙂☁️☁️☁️⛅💫🌟🌟🌟
@@AMillionCardTricks thank- you for reply!! Excellent content;one of my favorite channels!! Gary in dreamland.Have a nice dream!🙂☁️☁️☁️⛅💫🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟☁️⏰☁️ dream!!
You need 4 cards! If you multiply by only 9, it doesn't work without another card, 9x9x9x9x9x9x9=4,782,969 which equals 45....You need a 4th force card
Hey bozzo, what a stupid comment. Obviously when performing this to an actual crowd, you would use misdirection and different angles to make sure they wouldn’t see. The spectator would roughly see the shuffle in their peripheral, and more importantly hear the sound. This would be very convincing. I suggest you change your world view and give people chances. This kind of outlook will get you nowhere in life. I wish you the best of luck as you get the help you need.
@@ImSamKnight I just said that I saw that he doesn't mix the cards. I don't know what problem you have with your ego that it affected you personally. 😄
Bro I am a very old viewer of your….and trust me you made me popular in my college….thnx😊😊
That was so smooth. You’ve come a long way since your Svengali Deck Performance.
Oh man that shuffle is soooooo bold and brave. I love it. Screw a zarrow I'm just gonna put the packet back on top 😅😅 I absolutely LOVE it. Definitely going to be using this from time to time now thanks!!!
This is going into my reportoire faster than Gon's dad leaving
Damn bro 💀
The spectator doesn't actually have to multiply with 9, because any combination that becomes a multiple of 9 will work, like 3x3, 6x3, or 6x6 and it doesn't matter the order they put these numbers in, they could start by pressing 6, multiply it with a bunch of other numbers before they multiply with 3.
Brilliant trick man! Always come up with impressive tricks, thanks.
Great trick and tutorial as always Nathan
Totally gonna use this🥰
Thanks sm for the like Nathan🥰 Would love to be friends🥰
best tutorial channel on here, been following you since high school man. love your journey
Brilliant keep going. I'm just getting back into magic again and i rly love ur videos. Crazy that ur still uploading❤
They don’t even need to hit 9, as long as they hit 3 twice, 6 twice or 3 once and 6 once, it will still work!
Nathan I love your videos and tricks I watch your videos all the time and I learn them very quickly and then I do them on my family and they freak out and they say that one is so good and I say thanks to a million card tricks
First😊😊Amazing trick dude, thank you!
thanks nathan learned everything from you and now iam a sleight of hand magician now
Nathan love your work please make a gambling card trick
Keep the good work
great
Cool . Love it
Nice!
I was doing the trick while he was performing and I had no other duplicates. But when he got the number I counted and it was actually my card!😮
That is a brilliant trick my friend thank you so much for sharing your friend Billy Simmons
Billy are you still a fan of the Gaffer? I have not seen your comments on peters channel in a long time. Just wondered. Hope everything id going fine for you!! Take care. My friend. Gary in dreamland. Have a nice dream!!🙂🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Love the vids nathan. Can I ask what editing and thumbnail apps do you use?
I use iMovie to edit and Snappa for thumbnails
@@AMillionCardTricks Thanks
very good video TKU for sharing, can you perform and explain john Bannon botton bluff force? TKU
Hello brother
The trick is great and so is the explanation
But the matter does not need all this complexity. You can just keep the card in the specified place, for example in the 27th arrangement, and go to the calculator and type 27 + 0 x (the viewer can choose any number x any number x any number again) and the result will be . 27 No matter how different the numbers
And I am very sorry, I do not mean to amend, I mean to help as you always help me ❤
I appreciate your thinking, but I’m afraid your idea simply makes no sense lol. Imagine if a spectator typed in 3x6x9x7x4x5 and hit equals and saw the answer was 27. Anyone who passed 3rd grade level math would know that’s completely incorrect. Even if you limit them to choosing any two numbers, most people know their times tables memorized. If they typed in 7x8 = 27, most people would agree that looks odd.
@@AMillionCardTricksI was trying to see the rationality in his explanation but with all due respect it would only work on small children like 6 or younger 😅
Awesome trick 🤟👍🤟👍😊
Believe it or not brother my reportoire if full of ur tricks only , Thanks very much brother , keep up the good work❤❤❤❤
Very cool, thx.
U are great man
when i was watching i was like "wait is he not shuffling the cards or something?" but i just thought you were doing that but still pushing the cards together to sort of shuffle it
A very bold false shuffle that I intend to start using. Just not on camera lol.
Love your magic please do more tutorials 🎉
if you add up digits of 18 or 27 or 36, you get a 9. so you don't need any duplicates. why complicate things. just ask them to add up all digits of the multiplied number
Yes. Just came to read the comments to see if someone would suggest that idea. Good one.
@@tomi71 I would advise against that for two reasons. One, it adds an extra mathematical step which can tire the spectators attention span (I know its just simple addition, but its just more streamlined if you have them total the initial answer's digits and stop there.) And the second reason is that method would literally reveal the trick. If the spectators were curious and wanted to test the trick out again for themselves on a calculator, they would reveal the fact that 9 will always be a forced outcome and the trick is ruined. The fact that I leave at least 3 options in my version makes it more difficult for them to backtrack (even if they find out its always 3 numbers, then how could it have been a direct hit...?)
Great card at any number!! Can performer still show or display faces of cards at beginning of effect without spectator noticing the three kings?? If not then performer could just use a deck with only all kings; therefore it is necessary to display cards at beginning!! Gary in dreamland. Have a nice dream!!🙂☁️☁️☁️⛅💫🌟🌟🌟
Yes I forgot to mention! You can briefly show the spectator the faces of the cards, the bottom 20 cards that are not in the setup you can show freely
@@AMillionCardTricks thank- you for reply!! Excellent content;one of my favorite channels!! Gary in dreamland.Have a nice dream!🙂☁️☁️☁️⛅💫🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟☁️⏰☁️ dream!!
speechless
That's essentially a Zarro shuffle without shifting the top card as cover.
It's called Zarrow shuffle, but otherwise correct.
I have been watching you since you had no arm hair👍
I've been watching since he was 14
Im only at 2 min mark, but you havent actually shuffled any of the cards yet. You pull them apart after every riffle shuffle. Kind of obvious
We know
😢what if number 9 come at the solution
You need 4 cards! If you multiply by only 9, it doesn't work without another card, 9x9x9x9x9x9x9=4,782,969 which equals 45....You need a 4th force card
That outcome will never happen if you simply tell the spectator to type in a random assortment of numbers.
JUST BECAUSE YOU RECORD IT ENOUGH TIMES TO BE LUCKY....DONT MEAN IT ON PURPOSE.
What do you mean
That no cover card zarrow lmao
Bro is still using an iphone 5s 😢
If you need to perform 'breaks' then it is not 'self-working'.
Wasn’t including the card control in that statement. All I meant was the mathematics are self working
I understand the distinction BUT "it's honestly a self-working card trick" were the words you used.
Too convoluted there are easier ways to do this Without a calculator
I immediately saw that the cards don't mix, so I stopped being interested in this trick...
Hey bozzo, what a stupid comment. Obviously when performing this to an actual crowd, you would use misdirection and different angles to make sure they wouldn’t see. The spectator would roughly see the shuffle in their peripheral, and more importantly hear the sound. This would be very convincing. I suggest you change your world view and give people chances. This kind of outlook will get you nowhere in life. I wish you the best of luck as you get the help you need.
@@ImSamKnight I just said that I saw that he doesn't mix the cards. I don't know what problem you have with your ego that it affected you personally. 😄
Are you a magician?