I am a Kannadiga and am satisfied with Roman Sir's teaching, irrespective of languages... Even I am also a serious aspirant and what happens if i demand for Kannada language...? If someone is not understanding, then please go through plenty of books rather than blaming a wonderful teacher...
Guys plz, sir is doing us a great favour by this UNACADEMY platform by teaching us at free of cost which no one else on this planet would be willing to. So hence guys plz don't command sir by asking to teach only in English or Hindi. U imagine yourselves in sir's position and read all those comments, u would get to know what it feels like. N moreover even I'm a south Indian n even I dono Hindi completely, but I'm trying to learn Hindi and understand. Sir is trying to strike a balance for both Hindi and non-hindi students by using hindi and english language proportionately. If you are not ready to praise someone's effort, then better not to discourage them.
Shivani chauhan I am sorry, it doesn't mean tat in order to become an civil servant u should know Hindi. India is a Secular state, every language has its own importance and contributions. So every one should respect every language and try to learn it without any hesitation.
I am really shocked and ashamed that how our young future aspirants are quarrelling and debating with each others about these language issues. Are they forgetting the words tat are written in our Constitution that India is a SECULAR state. And if we aspirants debate and quarrel like this over these issues, do u really think that we are fit to be the future Bureaucrats. Don't ever forget that "We all are INDIANS"
yes it is so ....berubari union case 1960 ...it said preamble is not a part of constitution....then again 1973 case it is repelled and now preamble is part of constitution....
Shreeyansh Rai .. Yes, In Keshwanada Bharti case 1973, supreme court overruled its earlier judgement of Berubari case of 1960. In Keshwananda Bharti case supreme court held that preamble is the very part of constitution.
Shreeyansh Rai yes, preamble is nt part of constitution was held in berubari case of 1960 and after that in keshvanand case Premble was declared as part of constitution
रोमन सैनी जी आपका अशेष धन्यवाद इन वीडियो कार्यक्रमों के लिए। यदि भारतीय प्रशासनिक सेवा नहीं भी मिले तो भी आपके द्वारा बांटा जा रहा यह सही, सटीक, संकेंद्रित और तार्किक ज्ञान जीवन भर काम आएगा। जिन्हें हिंदी नहीं आती वो आपसे थोड़ी बहुत सीख जाएंगे और जिन्हें अंग्रेजी नहीं आती उनको भी आपसे लाभ प्राप्त हो रहा है। भारत सरकार की द्विभाषिक नीति है, पर आप निजी स्तर पर भाषा के इस महत्वपूर्ण पहलू को समझते हुए द्विभाषिक वीडियो बनाते हैं यह वास्तव में सराहनीय है, यदि कोई नकारात्मक विचार इस माध्यम पर आ भी जाते हैं तो मुझे पता है कि उन्हें भी आप सकारात्मकता से लेंगे। धन्यवाद
Hello sir In the Kesavananda Bharati case, the SC held that Preamble is a part of the Constitution. But you have put in the slide that it adopted the view that Preamble isn't a part of the Constitution. Kindly correct the mistake sir, so that people may not be misinformed. Thank you!
I hv studied these cases many times but always remain unaware of such depth..all says these cases r imp but 'how'..i got to understand by ur video..thank u vry mch sir
Under right to freedom : article 21A ( right to elementary education , state shall provide compulsory education to children from 6-14 years of age.) Previously it was DPSP which was made fundamental right and a new DPSP is made under which children's below the age of 6 years will be provided child care and education etc..
Roman sir is right " Verdict of GOLAKNATH Case was not correct and Government can Amend the fundamental rights by the virtue of Article 13(4) and Article 368(3), and the Constitution by Article 368, but without changing the basic structure and nature of the Constitution ”
In Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab Case'1967 Second point : • Included in IX schedule by seventeenth (17th) nor seventy (70th) Constitutional Amendment of constitution.
Unacademy is the best platform now a days for us in free of cost...still people crticizing unacademy and their educators who work hard to provide better facility , knowledge ...we are thankful to them
language ain't a barrier. I am a keralite. we are good with every language. all those who may comment stop discussing about language because it's bad for unity.😊😊😊
My dear sister's & brother's ,who r commenting irrelevant against unacademy plz ... think before comment ...D's much platform of free education no one will provide u ... utilizing the source is better than comment something.....
Just a correction, It was ADM Jabalpur case aka The Habeus Corpus case, not Keshavanand Bharti Judgment because of which H. R. Khanna J. was superseded for the post of Chief Justice of India. Great video sir!
Right to free and cumopulsury education was in Dpsp under article 45 but now it's a part of article 21 that comes under article 21A ,RTE ( RIGHT OF CHILDREN FOR FREE AND CUMOPULSURY EDUCATION)UNDER ARTICLE 21A
But according to M lakshmikant... In Minerva mills case.... Supreme Court ruled that fundamental rights conferred by article 14 and 19 were accepted as subordinate to the directive principles specified in article 39(b) and 39(c)
Sir, In laxmikanth book of Polity, it is said that Preamble is part of constitution according to the judgment given by SC in Kesavanand Bharati case. But you are saying that preamble is not part of constitution.
im feeling we all should be thankful to sir bcz we r taking priceless knowledge from here without any cost..in this earth there r only 1% of people who r genuinely interested in our success without any self motive...sir doing great job(ask urself after being successful will u do the same for others..????)
sir u r doing good job ...really u r true civil servant..ur lessons are very helpful to me....ur channel is really fruit ful to many aspirants.. I am requesting u to please create an app with quizzes with each topic for all subjects it would be very help to us I hope u would take into your consideration.... Thank u
@@tushardeshmukh1060 India is not only your country and please tell me where it is written that every Indian must understand hindi India's diversity is India's strength and please you don't decide that who should live in India and who should leave
Sir please correct me if I am wrong ..."preamble is not a part of constitution" is said by SC in Berubari union case and in keshevnanda case SC overruled it's previous decision and held preamble is a part of constitution and can be amended without altering the basic structure....
Hey Roman, if I am not wrong the reason why HR Khanna was not made the CJI was because of his lone dissent in the Habeas Corpus case. The New York Times, reporting on the Indian emergency, wrote," if India ever finds its way back to the freedom of democracy that were proud hallmarks of its first 18 years as an independent nation, then someone will surely erect a monument of Justice HR Khanna of the supreme court". The Kesavananda Bharati case had a 13 member constitutional bench and I don't know Justice Khanna was the senior most judge during that case.
Yes dear you are right.It is nothing but the doctrine of basic structure which saved us and thanks to honourable Khanna J and let's also not forget honourable Sikri CJ
No article 19 is suspended only when external emergency is imposed But In case of national emergency all fundamental rights are automatically suspended except articles 20 & 21.
If the golakhnath case is to challenge the 17th amendment act then it should be against union of india rather than state of punjab as only parliament have the amendment power under article 368. But the case always refers as golakhnath vs state of punjab. Why so??? Land tenure act of punjab government was already put in IX schedule so it's beyond the judicial review, hence there is no relation of punjab state in such case but we still consider them as a main party! Why so?? Please answer sir!! I'm too confused.
4.47 national emergency mein sirf art 20 , 21 , 19 don't get suspended during internal emergency and 20, 21 dnt in external emergency, Rest all fundamental right get suspended . Sir please correct it as u hv said wrong that only 19 get suspended
In re berubari vs UOI it was held that preamble is not part of constitution. In keshvananda Bharati supreme court held preamble as a part of constitution
I can guarantee that there is no other app or online educational institute that provides better content than unacademy. Deep and precise explaination of each topic of polity + 2 very famous 30 hrs polity videos. Much like in a story form. Content quality of unacademy>>>>>> anyone..... I don't even need to buy their paid subscription. There free videos are more than enough
It would be good if you can make the whole explanation in English so that those who doesn't know Hindi can also benefit. Nice work. Thankyou in advance.
I would like to know if Supreme court is allowed to intervene in cases of National Security when center does not impose Emergency etc. Is there any article where SC can rule out National Security issues in-order to suggest center? with DPofSP or otherwise?
sir.... wonderful vid.... just wanted to point out that in 1973 the court had held that the preamble is a part of the constitution but not enforceable. Please correct me incase i am wrong.
very nicely explained sir. thank you very much. i was looking for a video like this. i would request you to please also discuss important and landmark cases of criminal law.
Dear roman sir actually as far as my knowledge is concerned i know that the 44th amendment act was passed by parliament in 1978 but in the first case of the video u r saying that 70th constitutional amendment act, 1964. So sir plz make it correct
awesome awesome video sir...even though em not even remotely related to giving any such exam but... d way u teach makes us wanna read more...thank u sir...
sir if u explain your corse in hindi too...so that will be really helpful for many of the aspirants as your explanation is awsome so that's why i m just saking this
Article 19(1)(f) was deleted from fundamental rights and was added as Article 300(A) bringing it down to a constitutional right...please correct any such other similar mistake as misinformation is more hazardous than no information....rest you are doing a brilliant job and I wish a very best of luck to you !!!
i didn't get that golakhnath judgment omitted the possibility of amending fundamental rights and was kept out of reach of parliament so how could they amend it in 42nd amendment act ? please help
You are wrong. In Keseanand bharti case SC means to say You can amend the preamble without touching its basic part since Preamble is NOT Part Of CONSTITUTION .
i am from kerala i am not good with hindi, i am trying to adapt to hindi but i think english is good for all and adapting to english is not bad at all.
Preamble was said to be a part of constitution! My Goodness, don't teach us wrong. Thankfully I already read about Kesavananda case! Now I've to cross check other cases too before memorising! Oh God
Good morning sir I have one question about appointment of judge .......Indu Malhotra appointed by Chief Justice of india why not president .... laxmikant books says judges appointment by president
Great & enriching video Sir, whole heartedly thanks to you Sir. Looking forward for more of such self contained /standalone videos over important topics. _/\_
Sir i didnt understand the relation between menakaa gandhi's passport impounding and the the court's rule on article 21... i mean both the events seem so unrelated
![(हिंदी) Crash Course on Modern Indian History: (2/6) [UPSC CSE/IAS, SSC CGL]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RcuvyJIiq1U/mqdefault.jpg)
![(हिंदी) Crash Course on Modern Indian History: (2/6) [UPSC CSE/IAS, SSC CGL]](/img/tr.png)
It was fun getting advertisement of byjus on unacademy's video 😂😂
😂😂😂😂
😛😛
Beta aise joke marte ho ...pakka is banoge😂
Ias nhu chor bnenge 😊😂😂😂
I appreciate your noticing power 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I am a Kannadiga and am satisfied with Roman Sir's teaching, irrespective of languages... Even I am also a serious aspirant and what happens if i demand for Kannada language...? If someone is not understanding, then please go through plenty of books rather than blaming a wonderful teacher...
Balaraj Bagoji, naanu Kannada davne. Nimdu yav ooru..?
Uttar Karnataka😊😊😊
Balaraj Bagoji yav district ri nimdu.,? I'm from kalaburagi
Bagalkote
what you said is true sir even I am a Kannadiga.
Guys plz, sir is doing us a great favour by this UNACADEMY platform by teaching us at free of cost which no one else on this planet would be willing to. So hence guys plz don't command sir by asking to teach only in English or Hindi. U imagine yourselves in sir's position and read all those comments, u would get to know what it feels like. N moreover even I'm a south Indian n even I dono Hindi completely, but I'm trying to learn Hindi and understand. Sir is trying to strike a balance for both Hindi and non-hindi students by using hindi and english language proportionately. If you are not ready to praise someone's effort, then better not to discourage them.
I agree with your point hemanth...I wish people can be like you....
hemanth kumar i agree with you completely. anyhow all of us have to know hindi to a good extent , its an all india service.
Shivani chauhan I am sorry, it doesn't mean tat in order to become an civil servant u should know Hindi. India is a Secular state, every language has its own importance and contributions. So every one should respect every language and try to learn it without any hesitation.
I am really shocked and ashamed that how our young future aspirants are quarrelling and debating with each others about these language issues. Are they forgetting the words tat are written in our Constitution that India is a SECULAR state. And if we aspirants debate and quarrel like this over these issues, do u really think that we are fit to be the future Bureaucrats. Don't ever forget that "We all are INDIANS"
+hemanth kuttttmar t
I have read that in keshvananda case preamble was said to be a part of Constitution.
Shreeyansh Rai Exactly. I'm a law student, and my professor taught me it was ruled that preamble is a part of constition in Keshvanand case.
yes it is so ....berubari union case 1960 ...it said preamble is not a part of constitution....then again 1973 case it is repelled and now preamble is part of constitution....
Shreeyansh Rai .. Yes, In Keshwanada Bharti case 1973, supreme court overruled its earlier judgement of Berubari case of 1960. In Keshwananda Bharti case supreme court held that preamble is the very part of constitution.
Shreeyansh Rai yes, preamble is nt part of constitution was held in berubari case of 1960 and after that in keshvanand case Premble was declared as part of constitution
You are correct.. I also had the same doubt.. Preamble was held not a part of Constitution under Re Berubari case..
रोमन सैनी जी आपका अशेष धन्यवाद इन वीडियो कार्यक्रमों के लिए। यदि भारतीय प्रशासनिक सेवा नहीं भी मिले तो भी आपके द्वारा बांटा जा रहा यह सही, सटीक, संकेंद्रित और तार्किक ज्ञान जीवन भर काम आएगा। जिन्हें हिंदी नहीं आती वो आपसे थोड़ी बहुत सीख जाएंगे और जिन्हें अंग्रेजी नहीं आती उनको भी आपसे लाभ प्राप्त हो रहा है। भारत सरकार की द्विभाषिक नीति है, पर आप निजी स्तर पर भाषा के इस महत्वपूर्ण पहलू को समझते हुए द्विभाषिक वीडियो बनाते हैं यह वास्तव में सराहनीय है, यदि कोई नकारात्मक विचार इस माध्यम पर आ भी जाते हैं तो मुझे पता है कि उन्हें भी आप सकारात्मकता से लेंगे।
धन्यवाद
Hello sir
In the Kesavananda Bharati case, the SC held that Preamble is a part of the Constitution. But you have put in the slide that it adopted the view that Preamble isn't a part of the Constitution. Kindly correct the mistake sir, so that people may not be misinformed. Thank you!
Had same doubt...u r ryt..
exactly. :D
I hv studied these cases many times but always remain unaware of such depth..all says these cases r imp but 'how'..i got to understand by ur video..thank u vry mch sir
Under right to freedom : article 21A ( right to elementary education , state shall provide compulsory education to children from 6-14 years of age.) Previously it was DPSP which was made fundamental right and a new DPSP is made under which children's below the age of 6 years will be provided child care and education etc..
Roman sir is right " Verdict of GOLAKNATH Case was not correct and Government can Amend the fundamental rights by the virtue of Article 13(4) and Article 368(3), and the Constitution by Article 368, but without changing the basic structure and nature of the Constitution ”
In Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab Case'1967
Second point :
• Included in IX schedule by seventeenth (17th) nor seventy (70th) Constitutional Amendment of constitution.
thank you sir.
understanding these cases makes reading laxmi kant easier.
great compilation
Unacademy is the best platform now a days for us in free of cost...still people crticizing unacademy and their educators who work hard to provide better facility , knowledge ...we are thankful to them
language ain't a barrier. I am a keralite. we are good with every language. all those who may comment stop discussing about language because it's bad for unity.😊😊😊
Peter Stephen true bro
My dear sister's & brother's ,who r commenting irrelevant against unacademy plz ... think before comment ...D's much platform of free education no one will provide u ... utilizing the source is better than comment something.....
Free mei hai to kya galat v padhayenge? If u will be provided poison freely will u consume that with no questions?
We are making more better
@@netranandabehera2408 to mat padho bhai,,,doctor ne recommend kia h ?
Kisne kaha k ye free hai
Shut up
Indeed a very good lesson sir.Thanks a lot bhut kuch naya sikha.
Just a correction, It was ADM Jabalpur case aka The Habeus Corpus case, not Keshavanand Bharti Judgment because of which H. R. Khanna J. was superseded for the post of Chief Justice of India. Great video sir!
Right to free and cumopulsury education was in Dpsp under article 45 but now it's a part of article 21 that comes under article 21A ,RTE ( RIGHT OF CHILDREN FOR FREE AND CUMOPULSURY EDUCATION)UNDER ARTICLE 21A
10:11 this thing made someone carorepati. KBC 2018 ki first winner was asked this question at question no.15
Winner was Binita Jain. Yeah I remember.!
Sir plz continue in English because so many south Indian people followers of you
But according to M lakshmikant... In Minerva mills case.... Supreme Court ruled that fundamental rights conferred by article 14 and 19 were accepted as subordinate to the directive principles specified in article 39(b) and 39(c)
Sir, In laxmikanth book of Polity, it is said that Preamble is part of constitution according to the judgment given by SC in Kesavanand Bharati case. But you are saying that preamble is not part of constitution.
They have corrected it in description.
im feeling we all should be thankful to sir bcz we r taking priceless knowledge from here without any cost..in this earth there r only 1% of people who r genuinely interested in our success without any self motive...sir doing great job(ask urself after being successful will u do the same for others..????)
….. What’s your opinion now (after 4 years)?
art -21(7) right to education age below 14 years
sir u r doing good job ...really u r true civil servant..ur lessons are very helpful to me....ur channel is really fruit ful to many aspirants.. I am requesting u to please create an app with quizzes with each topic for all subjects it would be very help to us I hope u would take into your consideration....
Thank u
i pine to hear your " hey guyzz, whatsup?" so infectious!! thanks s ton !
One of the best videos coming out of Unacademy's pindara box....much needed and delivered beautifully!!!
Thanks for painting the life of aspirants with colour of SUCCESS....
Loda mera.।।। BC glt pda rha h
please roman sir..do continue in English just because south Indians can't understand hindi
exactly
Just leave the India then
@@tushardeshmukh1060 India is not only your country and please tell me where it is written that every Indian must understand hindi India's diversity is India's strength and please you don't decide that who should live in India and who should leave
@@tushardeshmukh1060 why u are living in India then if u don't respect south language .when we do that
@@Deeptiverma18429 u gave good comment
Sir please correct me if I am wrong ..."preamble is not a part of constitution" is said by SC in Berubari union case and in keshevnanda case SC overruled it's previous decision and held preamble is a part of constitution and can be amended without altering the basic structure....
Please review 11.46
I completed my schooling from kesvanath school..edaneermath
Hey Roman, if I am not wrong the reason why HR Khanna was not made the CJI was because of his lone dissent in the Habeas Corpus case. The New York Times, reporting on the Indian emergency, wrote," if India ever finds its way back to the freedom of democracy that were proud hallmarks of its first 18 years as an independent nation, then someone will surely erect a monument of Justice HR Khanna of the supreme court". The Kesavananda Bharati case had a 13 member constitutional bench and I don't know Justice Khanna was the senior most judge during that case.
Also it is sick textiles undertakings nationalization act not understanding
Yes dear you are right.It is nothing but the doctrine of basic structure which saved us and thanks to honourable Khanna J and let's also not forget honourable Sikri CJ
No article 19 is suspended only when external emergency is imposed
But
In case of national emergency all fundamental rights are automatically suspended except articles 20 & 21.
Right To Education - 21A
Thanks alot sir again
Why government can't make a law in favour of an engineer.Plzz bann those engineering clg who cant give 70% placement in his clg #_MECH
If the golakhnath case is to challenge the 17th amendment act then it should be against union of india rather than state of punjab as only parliament have the amendment power under article 368. But the case always refers as golakhnath vs state of punjab. Why so???
Land tenure act of punjab government was already put in IX schedule so it's beyond the judicial review, hence there is no relation of punjab state in such case but we still consider them as a main party! Why so??
Please answer sir!! I'm too confused.
4.47 national emergency mein sirf art 20 , 21 , 19 don't get suspended during internal emergency and 20, 21 dnt in external emergency, Rest all fundamental right get suspended . Sir please correct it as u hv said wrong that only 19 get suspended
In re berubari vs UOI it was held that preamble is not part of constitution. In keshvananda Bharati supreme court held preamble as a part of constitution
I can guarantee that there is no other app or online educational institute that provides better content than unacademy.
Deep and precise explaination of each topic of polity + 2 very famous 30 hrs polity videos. Much like in a story form.
Content quality of unacademy>>>>>> anyone.....
I don't even need to buy their paid subscription. There free videos are more than enough
HR Khanna Given a dissenting judgement in ADM Jabalpur case which cost him chief Justiceship not in KESHVANANDA BHARTI CASE.
It would be good if you can make the whole explanation in English so that those who doesn't know Hindi can also benefit. Nice work. Thankyou in advance.
One thing is not clear.. In Keswanand Bharti.. Supreme Court accepted 'preamble as a part of constitution' but Roman sir said opposite..
Thanks to Unacademy team , giving so much of boost for us by creating these types of videos...
Hi roman sir.....
Can u plz make videos on governance of india???
It will be a better help for competitive exam students...
Thnk u...😇
Sometimes it appears you are reading and understanding for urself! Anyway keep on
@shaik mansoor It wasnt for u.. Anyway
@@akankshapatil9838 neither the comment was for you. Users can give feedback. Isliye gyaan mat pelo
Your comment is meaningless
@@b.v.6137welcome! you have every right to express your views and critics...
I would like to know if Supreme court is allowed to intervene in cases of National Security when center does not impose Emergency etc. Is there any article where SC can rule out National Security issues in-order to suggest center? with DPofSP or otherwise?
Sir i started following u as last month only i started preparation..
Relly very nice sir..
Bohtt sara respect for you sir...
sir.... wonderful vid.... just wanted to point out that in 1973 the court had held that the preamble is a part of the constitution but not enforceable. Please correct me incase i am wrong.
everywhere i go i ultimately get complete solution here.. Please keep this forum free..
Simply awesome explanation 👍👌
Very nice video .....can understand 95% of the chapter taught
very nicely explained sir. thank you very much. i was looking for a video like this. i would request you to please also discuss important and landmark cases of criminal law.
Berubari bari union case confer preamble is not part of constitution but in kesavnanda bharti preamble is part of constitution....
You should have start with shankari Prasad case
Thank you for the explanation! Please keep sharing such videos...
One small correction - Its Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India 1978, not Menaka Gandhi.
He was not made the CJI because of his judgment in the ADM Jabalpur case not Kesavananda Bharati case.
He is best in simple words
Please make a video on right issues in India for upsc
Finally I understood all the case well ....thank u Roman sir
must watch video! superb explaination... :)
Sir I am fan of yours , God gifted brain you have
Dear roman sir actually as far as my knowledge is concerned i know that the 44th amendment act was passed by parliament in 1978 but in the first case of the video u r saying that 70th constitutional amendment act, 1964. So sir plz make it correct
Or ek baat sir ki aap ise full hindi me plz samjhaenge to hum hindi students samajh payenge pura
Subham Tripathy 70 was made to change it
08:57 Constitution is just a contract, if the people feel like they would like to revise it, there is nothing wrong in it.
awesome awesome video sir...even though em not even remotely related to giving any such exam but... d way u teach makes us wanna read more...thank u sir...
sir if u explain your corse in hindi too...so that will be really helpful for many of the aspirants as your explanation is awsome so that's why i m just saking this
yaa its true that in KN BHARTI CASE 1973 ,preamble was considered as part of the constitution.
Article 19(1)(f) was deleted from fundamental rights and was added as Article 300(A) bringing it down to a constitutional right...please correct any such other similar mistake as misinformation is more hazardous than no information....rest you are doing a brilliant job and I wish a very best of luck to you !!!
Impressive lecture.👍👍
Your videos have helped so much! Keep up the good work !
In keeshvanand bharti preamble was made an part of constitution. Sir you just told the opposite.
what's all these??I think we can read out these all,you made the videos and slides to explain and make us understand or to read?
beautifully covered roman sir...u cleared a lot of doubt of ours related to these cases
Right to timely medication in aiims is not there
We have to wait so long
very useful.thank u SIR G
i didn't get that golakhnath judgment omitted the possibility of amending fundamental rights and was kept out of reach of parliament so how could they amend it in 42nd amendment act ? please help
11:47 preamble is a part of the constitution.
the whole purpose of video got into vein
Nope. I've seen some experts in the comment section and they've enlightened me also.
You are wrong. In Keseanand bharti case SC means to say You can amend the preamble without touching its basic part since Preamble is NOT Part Of CONSTITUTION .
Supreme court held Preamble to be part of the constitution in Keshvananda bharti case......I think you got it wrong there
Ek dam jhakas best explained watch 2 or 3 times same video to remember
thank you...very nicely explained
Explain the subject in any one medium, either English or hindi
i am from kerala i am not good with hindi, i am trying to adapt to hindi but i think english is good for all and adapting to english is not bad at all.
Preamble was said to be a part of constitution!
My Goodness, don't teach us wrong.
Thankfully I already read about Kesavananda case! Now I've to cross check other cases too before memorising! Oh God
Good morning sir
I have one question about appointment of judge .......Indu Malhotra appointed by Chief Justice of india why not president .... laxmikant books says judges appointment by president
Sir baaki videos to aapke bahot ache hain... But ye video kuch samajh nh aaya... Kahin b cut kardiye ho... Kuch clarity se nai samjhaya aapne.
aap hii aur watsapp bhut accha bolte ho sir..and videos are damn helpful.
thanks a lot sir for your valuable guidance
This is helpful and to the point. Thankyou sir
Thank you sir aj jake clear hua about all the cases
This guy seems so frustrated with the Supreme Court
Could u pls provide previous year question papers with answers for prilims...
Thanx sir it's very much beneficial for me
Is there any source to get all important cases/judgements (not like 10 important or 20 important but a) comprehensive list i.e., more 100 judgements.
Sir if you teach in both languages like hindi and english, more students will be helped ...
Kindly do so..
Humble request to you sir
I m here only for sr bommai case..... Anyone else?????
Right to education Article 21(A)
Great & enriching video Sir, whole heartedly thanks to you Sir.
Looking forward for more of such self contained /standalone videos over important topics. _/\_
I do not understand the quite heavy terms in the lecture as I am the beginner . How should I understand those also ?
Thank you so much for teaching us in the best way we can understand !
Sir i didnt understand the relation between menakaa gandhi's passport impounding and the the court's rule on article 21... i mean both the events seem so unrelated
U r source n power to prepare for examination sir..
sir u are not able to convey these cases in lucid manner
If you don't like it , go to hell 😂😅, if is his way mannn
@@jonam2589 shut up dumbhose .