The REAL problem with Justice Thomas that NOBODY is talking about is this: The reason HE gives for his "mistakes" of not reporting all these gifts & so on is that he misunderstood the statue and the legal form he was filing out. How is that nobody else find this deeply disturbing? I mean, if the man can't understand a simple statue on ethics, or how to fill out a government form... WHAT is the basis for his ability & authority to decide the most difficult, complicated and important interpretations of laws in the nation?!? HIS OWN explanation for his misbehavior completely undermines his credibility without even examining the ethical issues...
You sir are precisely why I try to read as many comments as possible. We've been all concentrating on the ethics of this add infinitum and this is a perspective that calls into question his ability to reason.
Homeless bans are cruelty. Kicking someone that is down, is cruelty. Destroying/confiscating someone's property is cruelty. These are 8th Amendment violations, medical and financial discrimination. As a person on Disability, govt mandated poverty, I cannot afford housing or a campground, and therefore have no choice but to park on the side of the road. The Safe Parking areas are so restrictive that I don't qualify, since I'm disabled and not going back to work. And they kick people out at 7am, not able to return til 7pm, with no place to go during the day. And forced to this regardless of the medical ability to drive safely at that moment. And they threaten to tow my RV, taking everything I own, because I have medical issues. Again, medical and financial discrimination, and 8th Amendment violations. I've been fighting this locally, after seeing that several cities and counties throughout the country ruled them unconstitutional, and now the supreme Court rules against my life. They think it's ok to criminalize us for being on govt mandated poverty.... I want to sue the SC over this! I've been threatening to sue my county, they've been sued before over these bans. Of course, we don't want people trashing an area, but that's what litter fines are for. They can't treat someone as guilty of a crime they are not committing. I, in an RV, raised to be respectful by my parents, make no mess outside my vehicle, I shouldn't be treated as guilty because other people are guilty. That's injustice. Being Disabled doesn't mean I should lose my Rights to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. Yet cops threaten to take everything I own, and random people threaten to vandalize my shelter. And somehow these people don't think that vandalism is a crime......... 🤷🏻♂️ The SC needs to be sued.
I agree. Trumps court have made sleeping on a warm radiated side walk a crime. What's next asking with signs to help homeless Veteran's and families unlawful to ask/beg for assistance for food and / or donations. Will the police become impowered to drag us and families from our vehicles, demand our papers as to why we choose to believe in our fellow man/woman/families living on our streets no matter the reason? "What a tangled web is weaving when first we practice and place our millions to decieve".
Cry about it. There’s no evidence linking Ginni to JaNuArY 6. Furthermore, the Dobbs decision was a “codification.” Maybe you should move to a state where you can legally commit murder. Btw,I’m grateful that you don’t share the morals of your mother. I’m glad you’re here.💕
The Court has been paid off to do whatever these bribers want them to do. Expensive vacations. The judges need to live within their means like the rest of us.
@@joecancer6013 For whom?! Only for (mostly) white men of power and privilege. The belief being that autocratic patriarchal domination MUST be sustained.
If Trump wins and get congress, wave goodbye to this country as you know it...not hyperbole. Its coming, and its coming fast ya'll. Get your stuff in order
Don’t forget to vote blue on state and local elections as well. The extreme right has been propping up election deniers and Trump loyalists to take over from the ground level.
It’s why Trumps now promoting cancelling tips if he wins. That way he wont have to pay any tax on the money he will receive from Fossil Fuels, NRA or Big Pharma
What George doesn’t understand is that the judiciary is ignorant about science. They are really stupid about what nitrous oxide is. Gorsuch proved that. We need experts to decide complicated solutions.
Legislation needs to be drafted and brought to the American people for a re-structure of the Supreme Court appointments, and have them accountable as any other federal employee.
Exactly!!💯🎯. Thats why we need to steer clear of the Manchins and Sinemas and VOTE BLUE down the ticket to reclaim the House; hold the Senate and Presidency-TRIFECTA!!! Republicans would need to BEGIN the impeachment process for SCOTUS.😮
Tenure at the university I taught at was not a guarantee of a job for life. We were assessed yearly, and if our performance didn’t meet a particular level two years in a row, dismissal proceedings could begin. Maybe more assessment and job performance demands would work?
This is a good suggestion however the selection of an INDEPENDANT review committee itself has to be thorough and unbiased and is critical to the success of the process. To allow a current political party who is in power to be the review committee or indeed select the committee is no longer an option as partisan politics now dominate America's judicial and political institutions. It seems the more things change the worse things get. This may seem a little pessimistic but in today's climate it's becoming increasingly difficult to remain positive.
All of your speakers are focused on the larger picture, the major issue is if the decisions are moved to the judicial, they do not have the numerical capacity to decide in a reasonable time.
None of the Speakers showed that they had any real answers or even any idea of what to say. All I saw was big ????? hanging over their heads. Its like they don't want to accept the Reality of what just happened to our Democracy. Our Rights, ect....
The situation is so bad that the whole Roberts court will need to be reviewed and many rulings overturned. Congress will need to begin writing laws to check the courts for corporate and political bias. All protections of corporations over people or liability will need to be stripped. Any action against professional doctors to be stripped because judges are not licensed doctors with credentials to judge health or outcomes.
@@linusfingesi2222 after Biden reelection I hope he install a new AG who will not be as timid to investigate the court. Thomas and Alito will be the lowest hanging fruit. While a Senate work to end ambiguity of laws and groups can challenge Alito’s claim that the second amendment is not to arm state militias. To codify Roe into law with no exceptions. In other words all of us… the people
@@mrlh61 wishful thinking at best and you know it...House doesn't matter when it comes to SCOTUS....you need 60 Senators in the Senate and no way will the Dems get that (might not even hold on to the Senate as the Senate Electoral Map this election favours the GOP) presidency is a toss up right now and definitely the Dems will probably swing the House....so with that in mind SCOTUS is going to be like that for a while (Thomas and Alito will not retire if Biden is re-elected and there is nothing he can do about that...same way RBG refused to step down when she was pushed under Obama only to pass away under Trump).
@mrlh61 every time I see someone say "we the people", I always want to ask, what?? You do realize that everyone that opposes you, is also a part of "we the people"?? it's not a unified block that all want 1 single goal.
@@sandrahildebrand4283 Time to change it, then. Past its "use by" date. But even abiding by it would be better than what this SCOTUS is doing. Selective application.
All 6 of the Republican nominated judges must be replaced not because of their political persuasion, but because of the bias corrupted way they have used their immense power to throw the law behind a totally corrupted dishonest and extremely dangerous Republican nominee who will do irreparable damage to the American people. Back to the corrupt 6 SUPREME COURT JUDGES it is up to the President and lawmakers to not just find a way to dismiss these disgraceful corrupted 6judges but must come up with a long term solution to the problem of the process of the selection of SUPREME COURT JUDGES as it is blatantly clear the current method has failed. I don't know the solution but here is a clue Find a way to prevent totally corrupted Presidents from selecting judges who have a total lack of character dignity or shame. I believe the selection process must include an independent and highly detailed review of any nominated judge. The current situation of the President selecting the nominee and the review being left to the senate is simply unworkable. Re 2015 President Obama selects suitable nominee only to go to a hostile senate lead by the infamous Mitch McConnell who simply refused a nominee based on the wishes of a then Mr Trump. Then when trump wins the election he appoints not 1but 3 puppets sorry judges who will be insured a position as trump's party has control of the senate . It is obvious in today's world the old method relying on honesty decency and dignity simply does not work. Hopefully there is some food for thought here.
Yeah it’s a Democrat my whole family is voting for Trump. The policies have gotten too crazy and if you’re blind to that that’s fine but it’s unacceptable. The border the economy the wars, the indoctrination and the legal system was the last straw Trump’s New York case is going to get a return then I just tells you how much they broke in the constitution going after presidents they could start a spiral they have started a spiral that can destroy the country Democrats have.
I don't see anything wrong with -having- _demanding_ a *follow-up interview:* Any of the justices who sat there in front of Congress and *lied out of one of their two faces* when they said _"I respect _*_settled precedent, and Roe is settled precedent",_* should be brought before Congress again and asked *_"So, what's up with that?!"_*
@@joecancer6013 The people voted to keep it, over and over again. And if that is the case then TN and others would put it on the ballot. No naivety over here.😎
We need to vote all Democrats into the House of Representatives and maintain the Senate. That is the only way we're going to be able to get out of this mess
I don't see where the agencies have been all that effective within the last ten to twenty years. Only difference with now Chevron shut down, Supreme Court has now come out & made it official. 😢
@Bigfield47 but what can we do to change what the Supreme Court has already undone or put into place unless we can change the members of the Supreme Court or get them to abide to an ethics rule?🙄
Sorry Conway, this time you really don't know what you're talking about. This ruling is a parallel to the RvV - In that case the judges step in and overrule the doctors, in this case the local (bribable) judges will rule about things they don't understand, instead of leaving it to the federal experts in the area.
@@Omni0404 an admission that he dont know how our Federal bureaus work. That's why we took such a big hit during Covid. Trump got rid of the scientist and doctors Obama had in place that dealt with pandemics
Could've listened to this panel for an hour longer. Disappointed there was no mention of Martin v. City of Boise, as inflation and housing shortages are pushing millions of Americans to the brink.
@@joecancer6013 Thank you. Can you elaborate on how Biden alone is responsible for housing shortages, workers' wages not matching productivity for decades, private equity buying up houses throughout the country, cities lacking affordable housing, and inflation? I'd love a few non-biased, non-propagandized studies to support this hypothesis that you call "facts." I'm guessing you don't have any, but truly open to reading them if you do. I'll wait.
@@joecancer6013 inflation 6 years after tax cuts for the super wealthy, just like after GWBush did the same thing and we had a depression. Trump allowed for corporate profits to skyrocket, while millions of jobs were cut by those billion dollar companies that got tax cuts. Then we had a pandemic, that killed even more jobs, and trump had killed the pandemic relief fund just prior. And Republicans refused to renew the eviction moratorium. And Republicans refused to continue the pandemic support, except for the wealthy that didn't need the support. Republicans also refuse to adjust Disability and Food Stamps according to price increases. But again, all these companies are reporting record profits, on our backs. I don't know how you cannot see the connections and repeated history....
Why doesn't the Supreme Court operate like an appeals court? There should be a large bench from which you draw a certain number of justices. Plenty of room for recusal, plenty of justices to decide, much more impartiality of decisions and they could handle their larger docket in a timely fashion.
You criticize President Biden. Just listen to yourselves stuttering on this program. And and and just trying to start a sentence. All of you. Just listen to yourselves.
True, they are still young & no disabilities yet they stutter too & having hard articulating what they are saying for more than 2minutes. While Biden is pressured for 2minutes!
IF THE COURT IS MOVING TOO FAR TO THE RIGHT, then the so called justices are in violation of their sworn-oathes to uphold our Constitution! And... Lawyers - NOT KNOWING - whether or not something is Constitutional - or not - is SICK! We The People NEED our 2nd Amendment to be fully operational!
The Supreme Court should administer according to the law, but now the six judges administer according to party. The us Supreme Court Really makes the American people sad.
Ordinary people will not understand any of this. That is why we have the various agencies in place - so that experts in their fields can implement. No regulation = chaos.
I agree, it's almost as if they forgot about 2008-09 housing bubble crash, aka deregulation of the finance sector. Now no regulation for clean water, clean air. More shenanigans for finance (see cfpb and payday loans). More bribes for politicians to look they other way as toxic wastes go into nearby streams (see ohio). Or the egregious number of PE's taking over local water treatment plants, taking over of elder care, moving lower income people to medicare advantage (now known as deathcare).
I have always believed that court decisions should generally be the same given similar sets of facts as is the case with science. Unfortunately, law seems to be opinions and mostly logic. One gets the impression that anyone who is logical can become a judge without legal education
It WAS exactly that under Roe v. Wade. The idea of "later term abortions" was BS by those who wanted to re-criminalize abortion. Under Roe, women had unlimited choice ONLY during first 3 MONTHS, then in the snd 3 months, there was more regulation to PROTECT WOMEN'S HEALTH since abortion is more complicated in that period. In the final 3 months, ONLY EMERGENCY of mother's life or seriously danger to her bodily functions. The MAJORITY of abortions under Roe and now are n the first 3 months (92%) Most 2nd trimester abortions were either unexpected heath problems of a pregnancy or due to low-income owmen delaing a first trimester abortion because she has to find the money to get it!
What I seriously miss here is a valid discussion on how the SCOTUS is corrupted, and by whom. And, what impact this may have had. In particular, on justice Thomas. Also, whether and how a criminal investigation into such payments and gifts to justices could happen. In Germany, where I live, a an official, public servant or judge can not accept or welcome any gifts by third parties, it is a crime.
The founder didn't give the supreme court a lot of thought and how politicized the court could be. To fix this mess, the constitution needs to be modernized.
Why is that Justice Thomas born 1948, Justice Alito born 1950 isn’t being harassed like Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor born 1954 to retire when both these men are senior in age to her?
You criticize President Biden. Just listen to yourselves stuttering on this program. And and and just trying to start a sentence. All of you. Just listen to yourselves.
Us should set up a judicial commission to appoint judges🤣the arguments I know that,ll be there will be that it,ll also be partisan which is true but the commission will most likely have pple from both sides,,,like it can have the CJ,a representative of the supreme court,the appeals courts,the normal federal courts,,the AG to represent gvt,two representatives of the bar and maybe a representative from each party which can publicly interview judges who apply and have a set and unchangeable qualifications like a certain number of yrs on the bench or in practice,consider them and appoint the best,this whole president appoints is very rare in most countries and naturally they,ll appoint the most liberal or conservative judge they can find
It's a woman's decision to have an abortion or not. She is the best person to know whether to have a child is affordable, beneficial or reasonable to provide total care for another person, possibly for life. Momma Baby Daddy's Maybe ?
That is so right. They never mention anything about the fathers at all. They don't know the reasons of why a termination may have been necessary or how often they were actual medical issues.
The Supreme Court Term of Service Should be Limited. A Bad or Bias Supreme Court Decisions Can and Will be Bad for Much Too Long. Every Supreme Court Judge Should Make Fair Decisions Across the Border. Unfair Supreme Court Judges Should Be Dismissed and Removed from Office Permanently. Taking Bribes and Gifts Should Be Immediate Reasons for Removal of Supreme Court Judges ! Example Clarence Thomas and All Others.
Neal Katyal - Dartmouth College (BA)Yale University (JD) - endorsed both Neil Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh; Melissa Murray - University of Virginia (BA) Yale University (JD) testified during the nomination hearing of Brett Kavanaugh that he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade; George Conway - Harvard University (BA)Yale University (JD) - now an ardent detractor from anything DJT.
Phyce 101 Vocab Word, Maladaptive in other words = unreasonable and unwise (a watered down translation of the slur stupid, wacko, and nutt case) Maladapative = watered down anti-dementia patient slur / watered down explicitive stupid What's The Federal's High Court's beef with retired Post Master General Benjamin Franklin words that follows "If a printer printed nothing offensive a printer would print very little" - Benjamin Franklin, he who discovered electricity?😢....😮
It is refreshing to hear a panel of experienced and skillful legal experts engage in civil debate in a respectful and coherent manner. It is certainly an uncommon occurrence in today's contentious political and social climate. I wish there had been more time to expand the discussion and answer more questions from an audience that I am sure have been made anxious and unsure about the future of this current extremist Supreme Court. I agree with George Conway that Justice Thomas needs to be investigated, at minimum by the Senate Judiciary Committee for his flagrant impropriety in accepting over $4M in gifts from wealthy donor(s). As a property manager, I once returned a $50.00 restaurant gift certificate to a representative of a local union who wanted to thank me for kicking out a non-union moving company from the commercial office building I helped to manage. I immediately returned the gift certificate with a letter explaining that I was simply doing my job, and I could not accept the gift. Justice Thomas acts like a double showcase winner on The Price is Right (and then some). I would love to hear his justification for accepting lavish gifts and what he was required to do in return.
Sky is falling. It would be nice if they were a bit more objective. Well of course Conway is. The problem is really they worry about the courts - which is different than the case itself. You can say that about everything. And the court appointments ultimately reflect the voters as well - as we have seen. Er, Sky is not falling.
Posited is the administrative agency if they want to add a rule that’s a law it’s not a helmet you’re talking about taxation in this case $500 every time a boat goes out to fish because you have to hire a government agent and have to only fish 9 AM to 5 PM which is insane If you want to do something like that you go to Congress say we need this added to the law and if it makes sense Congress to do it and if it doesn’t make sense, you’re doing something that’s no good. Because you don’t need all the Republicans are all the Democrats you need the majority have to Republicans and half the Democrats to agree if it’s good because they can’t reject it like a normal bill by a minority party they have to take it up.
Well. Even Conway thought they wouldn't be corrupt and ruthless enough to grant Trump full imunity and sane conservatives usually have a better read on this. It just shows that the MAGA movement's madness is accelerating.
Roe v Wade v "if it's not in the Constitution it's not a right" v The 9th Amendment? "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall NOT be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." It's pretty obvious that they don't have to be.
I never thought I could agree with anything George Conway said, but I agree with his stance on the way the Supreme Court did by getting too involved during the time of the Warren Court and Bergen Court. Even Justice Ginsberg didn't agree with Roe.
This was over adding a government employee every time you go out and fish you had to pay $500 because they wanted to know the location if you want to know the location and track it put it on a GPS now the reason the agency passed this watch to put on a business fisherman because they have some crazy environmental nut that doesn’t want fishing. The only thing you’re going to do is if we don’t finish all the companies from other countries are going to come in and scoop it up. They don’t have the regulations so they were punishing Americans for no reason just to get them to stop and fish and that’s what they do over and over and over and over like the regulation that you gotta have electric cars that’s insane I can buy whatever car I want as long as I want if not everybody’s going to buy used cars and used engines and keep them cars forever you accomplish nothing because you can’t stop a car company from building a car engine.
Only the independently wealthy will survive in the end for anyone. At some point, if you are employed, you won't be. If you have a non- corporate business, you will lose it. Those with power right now, worldwide, are nihilists, and their view is "he who does with the most wins." We must all come to that realization.
How does every Democrat believe government overreach is good you’re brainwashed into thinking government is good government needs to be small and out of our life. They need the fence. They need to keep us safe and they need to handle taxes and help people with social services. That’s it. The social services is not even necessary. It’s what we wanna do is Americans because we want to help the poor
we the people who love United States of America support our President Donald Trump‘s 100% hopefully he can save our country from social Democrat agenda.
Chevron is great when they created the agencies no way Congress planned on the agencies having as much or more power than they do. They’re unchecked on elected and they’re adding to laws not making rules making laws that’s causing taxation and affecting peoples lives. The only difference is the agencies can add rules, but if they affect business or tax citizenry, they need to go back to Congress and explain to them why they wanna expand this law and negotiate them. What date is get rid of ideology so if you have all leftist are all people on the right working in the agencies it’s not what they want. They have to go to the courts were they have to negotiate or they have to go to the Congress where they want to change the law and negotiate with them and you’re gonna get a fair and balanced interpretation you can still do everything they want. They just have a check which they should have a check on them.
Seems like abolishing Chevron is more pervasive than eliminating Roe v Wade, in terms of creating confusion about what and who has authority to regulate whom and how. I suspect plaintiffs will have to litigate regulations and govt agencies will have to waste even more money on court costs to defend their regulations and citations for violations. What a mess.
Wonderful & informative . Would you consider to make a debate or discussion about the term limit for the supreme judges with scholars ? Thank you for these panal was eye opening.
Katyal should add a coda to this video, commenting on his feelings about the decision on immunity that in fact does what he thought it wouldn't because it couldn't. It's a sad time in America. We've had sad times before this, but this feels quite different. Insanity seems to be ruling.
This court doesn't seem to be honoring any history or the benefits of regulations like OSHA. Workers need OSHA to have a sensible and reasonable level of protection that workers have. The court does not have and should not have any power in this situation. All these issues need to be on the ballot. This Nation is out of control and on the road to destruction.
Where are the experts that can go to Congress and say we need to expand this law? They don’t have the power to make rules that act like law on their own that’s the way it should be. The other way is unconstitutional. That’s why I was overturn. it’s bad Law bad president stretch the laws by liberal judges it’s not it’s not right you gotta read the text and asked as the text says.
The REAL problem with Justice Thomas that NOBODY is talking about is this:
The reason HE gives for his "mistakes" of not reporting all these gifts & so on is that he misunderstood the statue and the legal form he was filing out.
How is that nobody else find this deeply disturbing?
I mean, if the man can't understand a simple statue on ethics, or how to fill out a government form... WHAT is the basis for his ability & authority to decide the most difficult, complicated and important interpretations of laws in the nation?!?
HIS OWN explanation for his misbehavior completely undermines his credibility without even examining the ethical issues...
You sir are precisely why I try to read as many comments as possible. We've been all concentrating on the ethics of this add infinitum and this is a perspective that calls into question his ability to reason.
Well pointed out, a great observation
exactly, either way he is too corrupt or too incompetent to be sitting on the highest court of the land
You guys are amazing!
Liz did an awesome job here NBC. Thank you for airing this important discussion on this rogue court.
George! They're doing exactly what Aileen Cannon is doing! It doesn't take 6 months to say NO
Homeless bans are cruelty. Kicking someone that is down, is cruelty. Destroying/confiscating someone's property is cruelty.
These are 8th Amendment violations, medical and financial discrimination.
As a person on Disability, govt mandated poverty, I cannot afford housing or a campground, and therefore have no choice but to park on the side of the road. The Safe Parking areas are so restrictive that I don't qualify, since I'm disabled and not going back to work. And they kick people out at 7am, not able to return til 7pm, with no place to go during the day. And forced to this regardless of the medical ability to drive safely at that moment. And they threaten to tow my RV, taking everything I own, because I have medical issues.
Again, medical and financial discrimination, and 8th Amendment violations.
I've been fighting this locally, after seeing that several cities and counties throughout the country ruled them unconstitutional, and now the supreme Court rules against my life. They think it's ok to criminalize us for being on govt mandated poverty....
I want to sue the SC over this! I've been threatening to sue my county, they've been sued before over these bans.
Of course, we don't want people trashing an area, but that's what litter fines are for.
They can't treat someone as guilty of a crime they are not committing. I, in an RV, raised to be respectful by my parents, make no mess outside my vehicle, I shouldn't be treated as guilty because other people are guilty. That's injustice.
Being Disabled doesn't mean I should lose my Rights to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness.
Yet cops threaten to take everything I own, and random people threaten to vandalize my shelter. And somehow these people don't think that vandalism is a crime......... 🤷🏻♂️
The SC needs to be sued.
You are absolutely right! I couldn't agree with you more.
It's despicable how many laws there are that are basically punishing poverty or disability.
@@DJJonPattrsn22 And keeping ppl with disabilities poor.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
I agree. Trumps court have made sleeping on a warm radiated side walk a crime. What's next asking with signs to help homeless Veteran's and families unlawful to ask/beg for assistance for food and / or donations. Will the police become impowered to drag us and families from our vehicles, demand our papers as to why we choose to believe in our fellow man/woman/families living on our streets no matter the reason? "What a tangled web is weaving when first we practice and place our millions to decieve".
We are dirt under their feet. They don't think they should have to give or do anything that may help someone other than themselves.
Roe should have been codified! Thomas's wife is MAGA up to her nose. She was at Jan 6. He should have recused!
Should it? Then have congress do their job. It's good news that it is left to the state.
You dont like it... move to California
Cry about it. There’s no evidence linking Ginni to JaNuArY 6. Furthermore, the Dobbs decision was a “codification.” Maybe you should move to a state where you can legally commit murder. Btw,I’m grateful that you don’t share the morals of your mother. I’m glad you’re here.💕
That’s where the money disappears. A whole lot of kickbacks for the favors! Only the public is dumbfounded.
The Court has been paid off to do whatever these bribers want them to do. Expensive vacations. The judges need to live within their means like the rest of us.
Project2025 unfolding before our eyes
Sweet!! A lot better than Globalization
@@joecancer6013 For whom?! Only for (mostly) white men of power and privilege. The belief being that autocratic patriarchal domination MUST be sustained.
@@joecancer6013 Globalization is here like it or not.
@@joecancer6013 we live on a globe, with other people. Denying that is just stupidity.
@@williamsrdan Who is denying it? Reading comprehension is tough for you or your emotional.
I'm not American, but I'm very sorry that the USA is increasingly similar to a third world country...
Thanks. We're working on it, but it's awfully hard.
@@jsb331yeah the left wing has really destroyed this country- hopefully we can get an America first elected in November
If Trump wins and get congress, wave goodbye to this country as you know it...not hyperbole. Its coming, and its coming fast ya'll. Get your stuff in order
lol. You mean we will get back to being a representative form of government like was designed?
Project 2025 is the road-map for a right-wing fascist State.
President, Senate and House election all crucial for America. Vote blue 💙
Voting Blue since 1972.
Not just that. The state races too, they run the elections, they rig and gerrymander.
Don’t forget to vote blue on state and local elections as well. The extreme right has been propping up election deniers and Trump loyalists to take over from the ground level.
Voting being sick 🤢
Didn’t the court just rule on receiving tips. I wonder who will get tips for this ruling
It’s why Trumps now promoting cancelling tips if he wins. That way he wont have to pay any tax on the money he will receive from Fossil Fuels, NRA or Big Pharma
What George doesn’t understand is that the judiciary is ignorant about science. They are really stupid about what nitrous oxide is. Gorsuch proved that. We need experts to decide complicated solutions.
9 out of 10 Doctors prefer Cambels. 100% of Scientists agree with who funds them.
@@joecancer6013 what is a Cambels?
Legislation needs to be drafted and brought to the American people for a re-structure of the Supreme Court appointments, and have them accountable as any other federal employee.
Exactly!!💯🎯. Thats why we need to steer clear of the Manchins and Sinemas and VOTE BLUE down the ticket to reclaim the House; hold the Senate and Presidency-TRIFECTA!!! Republicans would need to BEGIN the impeachment process for SCOTUS.😮
Perfection has been acheved ,voted RED , get these clowns out🎉🎉🎉😂🎉😂🎉😂😂
Tenure at the university I taught at was not a guarantee of a job for life. We were assessed yearly, and if our performance didn’t meet a particular level two years in a row, dismissal proceedings could begin. Maybe more assessment and job performance demands would work?
This is a good suggestion however the selection of an INDEPENDANT review committee itself has to be thorough and unbiased and is critical to the success of the process. To allow a current political party who is in power to be the review committee or indeed select the committee is no longer an option as partisan politics now dominate America's judicial and political institutions.
It seems the more things change the worse things get. This may seem a little pessimistic but in today's climate it's becoming increasingly difficult to remain positive.
@@BarryShambrook - I can wish you a happy Fourth of July, but I really wish I could wave my wand and fix this crap. Hang in there, Barry.
All of your speakers are focused on the larger picture, the major issue is if the decisions are moved to the judicial, they do not have the numerical capacity to decide in a reasonable time.
None of the Speakers showed that they had any real answers or even any idea of what to say. All I saw was big ????? hanging over their heads. Its like they don't want to accept the Reality of what just happened to our Democracy. Our Rights, ect....
The situation is so bad that the whole Roberts court will need to be reviewed and many rulings overturned. Congress will need to begin writing laws to check the courts for corporate and political bias. All protections of corporations over people or liability will need to be stripped. Any action against professional doctors to be stripped because judges are not licensed doctors with credentials to judge health or outcomes.
Overturned by whom!? SCOTUS is the highest Judiciary body...so who will overturn them? If only wishes were horses.
@@linusfingesi2222 after Biden reelection I hope he install a new AG who will not be as timid to investigate the court. Thomas and Alito will be the lowest hanging fruit. While a Senate work to end ambiguity of laws and groups can challenge Alito’s claim that the second amendment is not to arm state militias. To codify Roe into law with no exceptions. In other words all of us… the people
@@linusfingesi2222 A New court without Thomas Alito and if Roberts smell the roses and retire. We the People. A Democratic senate and house.
@@mrlh61 wishful thinking at best and you know it...House doesn't matter when it comes to SCOTUS....you need 60 Senators in the Senate and no way will the Dems get that (might not even hold on to the Senate as the Senate Electoral Map this election favours the GOP) presidency is a toss up right now and definitely the Dems will probably swing the House....so with that in mind SCOTUS is going to be like that for a while (Thomas and Alito will not retire if Biden is re-elected and there is nothing he can do about that...same way RBG refused to step down when she was pushed under Obama only to pass away under Trump).
@mrlh61 every time I see someone say "we the people", I always want to ask, what?? You do realize that everyone that opposes you, is also a part of "we the people"?? it's not a unified block that all want 1 single goal.
Landmark rulings are an understatement! No more life appointments, term limits for Supreme Court.
and adjust their term limits NOW!!!
@@hooker4749 Yes, exactly!
Right after term limits for congress.
We would need to change the Constitution, since lifetime appointments are in Article III of the Constitution.
@@sandrahildebrand4283 Time to change it, then. Past its "use by" date. But even abiding by it would be better than what this SCOTUS is doing. Selective application.
Remove and replace Alito and Thomas. They have shown nothing but extreme corruption at the very least.
Not to worry....Trump will replace them 😂😂
We need a trifecta in Washington DC
All 6 of the Republican nominated judges must be replaced not because of their political persuasion, but because of the bias corrupted way they have used their immense power to throw the law behind a totally corrupted dishonest and extremely dangerous Republican nominee who will do irreparable damage to the American people. Back to the corrupt 6 SUPREME COURT JUDGES it is up to the President and lawmakers to not just find a way to dismiss these disgraceful corrupted 6judges but must come up with a long term solution to the problem of the process of the selection of SUPREME COURT JUDGES as it is blatantly clear the current method has failed. I don't know the solution but here is a clue Find a way to prevent totally corrupted Presidents from selecting judges who have a total lack of character dignity or shame. I believe the selection process must include an independent and highly detailed review of any nominated judge. The current situation of the President selecting the nominee and the review being left to the senate is simply unworkable. Re 2015 President Obama selects suitable nominee only to go to a hostile senate lead by the infamous Mitch McConnell who simply refused a nominee based on the wishes of a then Mr Trump. Then when trump wins the election he appoints not 1but 3 puppets sorry judges who will be insured a position as trump's party has control of the senate . It is obvious in today's world the old method relying on honesty decency and dignity simply does not work. Hopefully there is some food for thought here.
Vote blue 💙 America our only safe choice. America needs to reelect Joe Biden n move forward. 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
Yeah it’s a Democrat my whole family is voting for Trump. The policies have gotten too crazy and if you’re blind to that that’s fine but it’s unacceptable. The border the economy the wars, the indoctrination and the legal system was the last straw Trump’s New York case is going to get a return then I just tells you how much they broke in the constitution going after presidents they could start a spiral they have started a spiral that can destroy the country Democrats have.
I don't see anything wrong with -having- _demanding_ a *follow-up interview:* Any of the justices who sat there in front of Congress and *lied out of one of their two faces* when they said _"I respect _*_settled precedent, and Roe is settled precedent",_* should be brought before Congress again and asked *_"So, what's up with that?!"_*
Supreme Court has done nothing but hurt America for the last 2 years. They are only with traitor Trump...which means they are for putin.
Repubs control the process. Removal begins in the House.
Roe is in the hands of the people. Don't be Naive.
@@joecancer6013 The people voted to keep it, over and over again. And if that is the case then TN and others would put it on the ballot. No naivety over here.😎
Will they also get a chance to still ask Justice Jackson to define what a "Woman" is I wonder😂
They don't care what we think, they already proved it
Something needs to be done and all the talking needs to stop too much talk not any action
We need to vote all Democrats into the House of Representatives and maintain the Senate. That is the only way we're going to be able to get out of this mess
Vote RED
@@dlcs1406Exactly!
@@jimmywilliams9824trump 2024
Sorry George but they mean to completely dismantle those agencies one by one
Thank God we can remove the shackles of regulation from the administrative state.
@@onedrop7967 both sides go too far. That is the human way.
The court has really changed! Thats an understatement..The future looks bleak.
Vote for democracy and the Supreme Court, wish more people understood that in 2016.
Court is perfect, vote these clowns out😂😂🎉😂🎉😂🎉
🙏🙏🙏prayers for America 🇺🇸… please let’s fight together get out & vote blue against authoritarianism & convicted felons!!!
Lack of regulations means disaster.
Regulations are protections to keep the public safe.
@@adinahirschmann3112like air and water
It always ends badly. Kind of like the trickle down economics.
There are regulations... handed Down by congress.
I don't see where the agencies have been all that effective within the last ten to twenty years. Only difference with now Chevron shut down, Supreme Court has now come out & made it official. 😢
If we want change we need to vote blue at the state level more than ever.
@Bigfield47 but what can we do to change what the Supreme Court has already undone or put into place unless we can change the members of the Supreme Court or get them to abide to an ethics rule?🙄
Too bad. Trump is going to get another Supreme Court pick! Eat your heart out
So you want more states like California, Chicago, NY etc etc.
Democrat judges can't not even say what a woman is.
AMERICA IS AT IT'S BEST WHEN IT'S RED😂❤😂❤😂❤😂❤😂❤
@@joecancer6013He will never be President of the United States ever again.
Sorry Conway, this time you really don't know what you're talking about. This ruling is a parallel to the RvV - In that case the judges step in and overrule the doctors, in this case the local (bribable) judges will rule about things they don't understand, instead of leaving it to the federal experts in the area.
Experts in Federal government? What are you smoking?
@@magicmandj Yes. Experts in government.
@@Omni0404 an admission that he dont know how our Federal bureaus work. That's why we took such a big hit during Covid. Trump got rid of the scientist and doctors Obama had in place that dealt with pandemics
Could've listened to this panel for an hour longer. Disappointed there was no mention of Martin v. City of Boise, as inflation and housing shortages are pushing millions of Americans to the brink.
Biden did that
@@joecancer6013 Thanks for your intelligent response.
@@91ir07 You're welcome. I saw you were on Msnbc and needed some facts instead of propaganda.
@@joecancer6013 Thank you. Can you elaborate on how Biden alone is responsible for housing shortages, workers' wages not matching productivity for decades, private equity buying up houses throughout the country, cities lacking affordable housing, and inflation? I'd love a few non-biased, non-propagandized studies to support this hypothesis that you call "facts." I'm guessing you don't have any, but truly open to reading them if you do. I'll wait.
@@joecancer6013 inflation 6 years after tax cuts for the super wealthy, just like after GWBush did the same thing and we had a depression.
Trump allowed for corporate profits to skyrocket, while millions of jobs were cut by those billion dollar companies that got tax cuts.
Then we had a pandemic, that killed even more jobs, and trump had killed the pandemic relief fund just prior. And Republicans refused to renew the eviction moratorium. And Republicans refused to continue the pandemic support, except for the wealthy that didn't need the support. Republicans also refuse to adjust Disability and Food Stamps according to price increases.
But again, all these companies are reporting record profits, on our backs.
I don't know how you cannot see the connections and repeated history....
George, Ted Bundy was well liked and very personable. Untillll.......
Good point
Why doesn't the Supreme Court operate like an appeals court? There should be a large bench from which you draw a certain number of justices. Plenty of room for recusal, plenty of justices to decide, much more impartiality of decisions and they could handle their larger docket in a timely fashion.
Isnt NOW is Biden's opportunity to appoint his people to scotus...
He has a slim senate majority and he doesn’t have the house right now. He needs a trifecta win. Vote 💙💙💙💙
LANDMARK RULINGS ARE AN UNDERSTATEMENT! NO MORE LIFE APPOINTMENTS, TERM LIMITS FOR SUPREME COURT. 🙂😄😀
Vote 💙💙💙
Perfection has been acheved vote RED , make America saine again 😂❤🎉😂❤😂🎉🎉😂❤😂🎉🎉🎉😂❤😂🎉🎉🎉🎉
You criticize President Biden. Just listen to yourselves stuttering on this program. And and and just trying to start a sentence. All of you. Just listen to yourselves.
True, they are still young & no disabilities yet they stutter too & having hard articulating what they are saying for more than 2minutes. While Biden is pressured for 2minutes!
Reading this AFTER the immunity decision came out. Shtrumph was NOT disappointed as George suggested he would be...😒
IF THE COURT IS MOVING TOO FAR TO THE RIGHT, then the so called justices are in violation of their sworn-oathes to uphold our Constitution! And... Lawyers - NOT KNOWING - whether or not something is Constitutional - or not - is SICK!
We The People NEED our 2nd Amendment to be fully operational!
Roberts does not care if they are trusted or not. The smirk on his face is obnoxious.
The Supreme Court should administer according to the law, but now the six judges administer according to party. The us Supreme Court Really makes the American people sad.
Ordinary people will not understand any of this. That is why we have the various agencies in place - so that experts in their fields can implement. No regulation = chaos.
I agree, it's almost as if they forgot about 2008-09 housing bubble crash, aka deregulation of the finance sector. Now no regulation for clean water, clean air. More shenanigans for finance (see cfpb and payday loans). More bribes for politicians to look they other way as toxic wastes go into nearby streams (see ohio). Or the egregious number of PE's taking over local water treatment plants, taking over of elder care, moving lower income people to medicare advantage (now known as deathcare).
With this debacle decision we can lose the government of people, today I'm not sure if equitable
corporate entities care about people's lives
Let me be clear . Ninety nine percent of companies only care about their bottom line and shareholders, never outcomes for the better of societies.
They care in as much as it affects their bottom line. The stock price is all that matters to them.
Spoken like a true Federalist Society member, George!
Now we know, Neil 😢🇺🇲💔
I have always believed that court decisions should generally be the same given similar sets of facts as is the case with science. Unfortunately, law seems to be opinions and mostly logic. One gets the impression that anyone who is logical can become a judge without legal education
13 Districts, 13 Justices
Only leave 4 minutes for the audience to ask questions. How selfish. You use up 99% of the time and 100% of the Oxygen in the room.
Third trimester has to be an emergency and it has to be a delivery, not an abortion. Huge difference
It WAS exactly that under Roe v. Wade. The idea of "later term abortions" was BS by those who wanted to re-criminalize abortion. Under Roe, women had unlimited choice ONLY during first 3 MONTHS, then in the snd 3 months, there was more regulation to PROTECT WOMEN'S HEALTH since abortion is more complicated in that period. In the final 3 months, ONLY EMERGENCY of mother's life or seriously danger to her bodily functions. The MAJORITY of abortions under Roe and now are n the first 3 months (92%) Most 2nd trimester abortions were either unexpected heath problems of a pregnancy or due to low-income owmen delaing a first trimester abortion because she has to find the money to get it!
the scotus has gone rogue...feral.
Call in the FBI..
What I seriously miss here is a valid discussion on how the SCOTUS is corrupted, and by whom. And, what impact this may have had. In particular, on justice Thomas. Also, whether and how a criminal investigation into such payments and gifts to justices could happen.
In Germany, where I live, a an official, public servant or judge can not accept or welcome any gifts by third parties, it is a crime.
Thanks for educating us.
These people caused divide in this country with lies and never correcting audiences. Bs
The founder didn't give the supreme court a lot of thought and how politicized the court could be. To fix this mess, the constitution needs to be modernized.
The Founders didn't think of a lot of things....Constitution mordenized? Good luck with that. Ain't happening any time in the near future.
The Founders didn't think of a lot of things....Constitution mordenized? Good luck with that. Ain't happening any time in the near future.
Why is that Justice Thomas born 1948, Justice Alito born 1950 isn’t being harassed like Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor born 1954 to retire when both these men are senior in age to her?
RBG said Roe should have been decided on equal protection grounds NOT1st amendment grounds.
You criticize President Biden. Just listen to yourselves stuttering on this program. And and and just trying to start a sentence. All of you. Just listen to yourselves.
Thomas' failures to disclose were not "ethical lapses, " they were criminal acts, and they should be prosecuted as such.
When the Court has final say about the Constitutionality, ie the legality, of a law, it is no longer a coequal branch. It is the highest authority.
Bla bla bla … I don’t like what SUCOT CRYING 😢 BABIES
They should not be life turns period.
George, I love you but, you always give the Maga Court too much credit where none is due.
And now days later we see that they were all wrong about how the supreme Court was going to rule on presidential immunity.
Us should set up a judicial commission to appoint judges🤣the arguments I know that,ll be there will be that it,ll also be partisan which is true but the commission will most likely have pple from both sides,,,like it can have the CJ,a representative of the supreme court,the appeals courts,the normal federal courts,,the AG to represent gvt,two representatives of the bar and maybe a representative from each party which can publicly interview judges who apply and have a set and unchangeable qualifications like a certain number of yrs on the bench or in practice,consider them and appoint the best,this whole president appoints is very rare in most countries and naturally they,ll appoint the most liberal or conservative judge they can find
Postponed abortion decisions until after denutering administrative agencies.
Shut up, George
You're a lousy judge of reality
It's a woman's decision to have an abortion or not. She is the best person to know whether to have a child is affordable, beneficial or reasonable to provide total care for another person, possibly for life. Momma Baby Daddy's Maybe ?
That is so right. They never mention anything about the fathers at all. They don't know the reasons of why a termination may have been necessary or how often they were actual medical issues.
“…and hopefully not with the second thump administration”?
Weknow who he’s voting for.
Nothing he said is of any value, as he is of no value.
I thought the same thing when he said that.
Congress's job isn't to delegate!! It's to legislate
Thomas cant figure out a disclosure form.
Listen to them whine.
Congress do your job
_Gitmo' ....Gitmo' ....Gitmo' ....Gitmo' ...."Gitmo' 5"_
I like GEORGE MORE EVERY DAY
These people not now real law.
You guys are ridiculous!
43000 views when I came here, 622 upvotes. While most of the comments are against the court decisions, most of the viewership seems to disagree.
Yes absolutely.
The Supreme Court Term of Service Should be Limited. A Bad or Bias Supreme Court Decisions Can and Will be Bad for Much Too Long. Every Supreme Court Judge Should Make Fair Decisions Across the Border. Unfair Supreme Court Judges Should Be Dismissed and Removed from Office Permanently. Taking Bribes and Gifts Should Be Immediate Reasons for Removal of Supreme Court Judges ! Example Clarence Thomas and All Others.
Neal Katyal - Dartmouth College (BA)Yale University (JD) - endorsed both Neil Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh; Melissa Murray - University of Virginia (BA) Yale University (JD) testified during the nomination hearing of Brett Kavanaugh that he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade; George Conway - Harvard University (BA)Yale University (JD) - now an ardent detractor from anything DJT.
Phyce 101 Vocab Word, Maladaptive in other words = unreasonable and unwise (a watered down translation of the slur stupid, wacko, and nutt case)
Maladapative = watered down anti-dementia patient slur / watered down explicitive stupid
What's The Federal's High Court's beef with retired Post Master General Benjamin Franklin words that follows "If a printer printed nothing offensive a printer would print very little" - Benjamin Franklin, he who discovered electricity?😢....😮
It is refreshing to hear a panel of experienced and skillful legal experts engage in civil debate in a respectful and coherent manner. It is certainly an uncommon occurrence in today's contentious political and social climate. I wish there had been more time to expand the discussion and answer more questions from an audience that I am sure have been made anxious and unsure about the future of this current extremist Supreme Court. I agree with George Conway that Justice Thomas needs to be investigated, at minimum by the Senate Judiciary Committee for his flagrant impropriety in accepting over $4M in gifts from wealthy donor(s). As a property manager, I once returned a $50.00 restaurant gift certificate to a representative of a local union who wanted to thank me for kicking out a non-union moving company from the commercial office building I helped to manage. I immediately returned the gift certificate with a letter explaining that I was simply doing my job, and I could not accept the gift. Justice Thomas acts like a double showcase winner on The Price is Right (and then some). I would love to hear his justification for accepting lavish gifts and what he was required to do in return.
Supreme Court several members have CLOSE TIES 💰💰✈️🚢WITH WEALTHIEST OPINIONS AND SWING towards these few FRIENDS ZIP 🤐 ABOUT WE THE PEOPLE
POWERFUL PANEL!!! Great insights, super smart, forward thinking. Well done and, Thank You!!
Sky is falling. It would be nice if they were a bit more objective. Well of course Conway is. The problem is really they worry about the courts - which is different than the case itself. You can say that about everything. And the court appointments ultimately reflect the voters as well - as we have seen. Er, Sky is not falling.
Posited is the administrative agency if they want to add a rule that’s a law it’s not a helmet you’re talking about taxation in this case $500 every time a boat goes out to fish because you have to hire a government agent and have to only fish 9 AM to 5 PM which is insane If you want to do something like that you go to Congress say we need this added to the law and if it makes sense Congress to do it and if it doesn’t make sense, you’re doing something that’s no good. Because you don’t need all the Republicans are all the Democrats you need the majority have to Republicans and half the Democrats to agree if it’s good because they can’t reject it like a normal bill by a minority party they have to take it up.
Well. Even Conway thought they wouldn't be corrupt and ruthless enough to grant Trump full imunity and sane conservatives usually have a better read on this. It just shows that the MAGA movement's madness is accelerating.
Roe v Wade v "if it's not in the Constitution it's not a right" v The 9th Amendment?
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall NOT be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
It's pretty obvious that they don't have to be.
I never thought I could agree with anything George Conway said, but I agree with his stance on the way the Supreme Court did by getting too involved during the time of the Warren Court and Bergen Court. Even Justice Ginsberg didn't agree with Roe.
This was over adding a government employee every time you go out and fish you had to pay $500 because they wanted to know the location if you want to know the location and track it put it on a GPS now the reason the agency passed this watch to put on a business fisherman because they have some crazy environmental nut that doesn’t want fishing. The only thing you’re going to do is if we don’t finish all the companies from other countries are going to come in and scoop it up. They don’t have the regulations so they were punishing Americans for no reason just to get them to stop and fish and that’s what they do over and over and over and over like the regulation that you gotta have electric cars that’s insane I can buy whatever car I want as long as I want if not everybody’s going to buy used cars and used engines and keep them cars forever you accomplish nothing because you can’t stop a car company from building a car engine.
Only the independently wealthy will survive in the end for anyone. At some point, if you are employed, you won't be. If you have a non- corporate business, you will lose it. Those with power right now, worldwide, are nihilists, and their view is "he who does with the most wins." We must all come to that realization.
How does every Democrat believe government overreach is good you’re brainwashed into thinking government is good government needs to be small and out of our life. They need the fence. They need to keep us safe and they need to handle taxes and help people with social services. That’s it. The social services is not even necessary. It’s what we wanna do is Americans because we want to help the poor
I love it. Libs losing it!!!
deregulation of the finance markets. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007%E2%80%932008_financial_crisis
we the people who love United States of America support our President Donald Trump‘s 100% hopefully he can save our country from social Democrat agenda.
Chevron is great when they created the agencies no way Congress planned on the agencies having as much or more power than they do. They’re unchecked on elected and they’re adding to laws not making rules making laws that’s causing taxation and affecting peoples lives. The only difference is the agencies can add rules, but if they affect business or tax citizenry, they need to go back to Congress and explain to them why they wanna expand this law and negotiate them. What date is get rid of ideology so if you have all leftist are all people on the right working in the agencies it’s not what they want. They have to go to the courts were they have to negotiate or they have to go to the Congress where they want to change the law and negotiate with them and you’re gonna get a fair and balanced interpretation you can still do everything they want. They just have a check which they should have a check on them.
Thank you to Vice President kamala Harris, the Democratic Party, the people involved in the positive direction of the USA 🇺🇸
Seems like abolishing Chevron is more pervasive than eliminating Roe v Wade, in terms of creating confusion about what and who has authority to regulate whom and how. I suspect plaintiffs will have to litigate regulations and govt agencies will have to waste even more money on court costs to defend their regulations and citations for violations. What a mess.
Wonderful & informative . Would you consider to make a debate or discussion about the term limit for the supreme judges with scholars ? Thank you for these panal was eye opening.
Katyal should add a coda to this video, commenting on his feelings about the decision on immunity that in fact does what he thought it wouldn't because it couldn't. It's a sad time in America. We've had sad times before this, but this feels quite different. Insanity seems to be ruling.
This court doesn't seem to be honoring any history or the benefits of regulations like OSHA. Workers need OSHA to have a sensible and reasonable level of protection that workers have. The court does not have and should not have any power in this situation. All these issues need to be on the ballot. This Nation is out of control and on the road to destruction.
The first’s thing we do is
Bye bye republicans
He doesn't have a CLUE!
Pull up the history of abortions in this country, abortions were LEGAL when the United States Constitution went into effect.
Where are the experts that can go to Congress and say we need to expand this law? They don’t have the power to make rules that act like law on their own that’s the way it should be. The other way is unconstitutional. That’s why I was overturn. it’s bad Law bad president stretch the laws by liberal judges it’s not it’s not right you gotta read the text and asked as the text says.