Van Cleef & Arpels Diamond Ring, ca. 1970 | Best Moment | ANTIQUES ROADSHOW | PBS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • Over five carats of "Denny Diamond" sparkle! Watch Kaitlin Shinnick appraise a Van Cleef & Arpels diamond ring, ca. 1970, in McNay Art Museum, Hour 3.
    See more Season 24 Best Moments and stream full episodes here: bit.ly/S24Best....
    ANTIQUES ROADSHOW airs Mondays at 8/7C PM & 9/8C PM on PBS.
    Watch full-length episodes of ANTIQUES ROADSHOW at: www.pbs.org/wg....
    To be the first to know about all our broadcast and tour info, subscribe to our newsletter and follow @RoadshowPBS on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Pinterest!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 535

  • @Titanicdork133
    @Titanicdork133 4 роки тому +770

    They need to make a film about this denny character that went around marrying women, giving them 5 carat diamond rings and ditching them 5 months later

    • @exdus235
      @exdus235 4 роки тому +18

      My thoughts as well.

    • @darrenporsch
      @darrenporsch 4 роки тому +36

      The guy had more money than brains. who gets married to someone after you've known them only a couple weeks and what a surprise the marriage only last a couple months.

    • @diverdhal4013
      @diverdhal4013 3 роки тому +33

      watch Boston Legal
      William Shatner as Denny Crane

    • @MoniqueSinha
      @MoniqueSinha 3 роки тому +6

      Yesssss

    • @starriderkittykat9064
      @starriderkittykat9064 3 роки тому +1

      @@darrenporsch Me...lmao

  • @aaronpaul06
    @aaronpaul06 4 роки тому +273

    I’d be so pissed if a jeweler took the marking off of the band!

    • @JustinLHopkins
      @JustinLHopkins 4 роки тому +22

      Yah, that happened to me. I bought a $3000 David Yurman ring less than a year ago and had it sized. I got it back and the signature along with the gold karat was completely taken off.

    • @elenaarman-tang7811
      @elenaarman-tang7811 4 роки тому +6

      @@JustinLHopkins I hope you kept the original paper work.

    • @JeanSuki
      @JeanSuki 4 роки тому +6

      I had this with a antique ring I have, gold karat was taken off...

    • @GWBendik
      @GWBendik 4 роки тому +26

      @@JustinLHopkins this happens when they heat the material, so if you dont resize it at an authorized dealer of the brand, they lagally cant put the marks/brand back on

    • @SweetTinglesASMR11
      @SweetTinglesASMR11 3 роки тому +18

      Well you’d be pissed at yourself then because the jeweler can’t keep a marking on the band if that’s where it’s being sized.

  • @steveprice638
    @steveprice638 4 роки тому +299

    She knew already. Just wanted others to know too....

    • @amberbassoN12
      @amberbassoN12 3 роки тому +3

      Right?

    • @amyd7794
      @amyd7794 2 роки тому +4

      No she was completely disappointed

    • @AskMiko
      @AskMiko 2 роки тому +5

      I think she hoped it was worth more… if the marking was still on the band, maybe it would be

    • @maryhirsch7170
      @maryhirsch7170 2 роки тому +1

      I love all these jewelry ignorant (not) people that act all surprised.

    • @Juddly05
      @Juddly05 2 роки тому

      Like mother like daughter.

  • @Smood47
    @Smood47 4 роки тому +281

    You ring is worth $140,000.
    Lady: -_-
    Clearly talking to a baller here.

    • @b.tillman6195
      @b.tillman6195 4 роки тому +22

      Did you see that ginormous gold pendant she was wearing?

    • @Jude74
      @Jude74 4 роки тому +28

      I bet this lady’s jewelry box is awesome.

    • @annek1226
      @annek1226 3 роки тому +18

      I’m sorry, she did not inherit her mother’s class.

    • @Smood47
      @Smood47 3 роки тому +2

      This lady would make Slick Rick flinch.

    • @StarkVandalez
      @StarkVandalez 3 роки тому +21

      its because she already assumed it would be worth 120k due to inflation.. she knew it was 20k in 1970.. so nothing special.

  • @dawn881
    @dawn881 4 роки тому +192

    wow wish i knew a "denny"

  • @facebookcom-ej7dm
    @facebookcom-ej7dm 3 роки тому +202

    “You’re mother was smart, she kept the paperwork “. I’m thinking her mother was a whole lot smarter than that. Meets a guy and 2 weeks later gets a 5 carat diamond and platinum ring, only stays married to the idiot/serial marriage guy for a few months and walks away with a $100K ring.

    • @OffGridInvestor
      @OffGridInvestor 3 роки тому +34

      Mother sounded like a cunning gold digger tbh. And the woman already knew it's value (lack of surprise) and was on the show just to show it off.

    • @nemo6686
      @nemo6686 3 роки тому +3

      Notice how relaxed they are that the transfer of wealth in even a brief marriage is from man to woman - and I bet they'd describe themselves as feminists. It's the same thinking that makes the shift back and forth between 'I am woman, hear me roar' and 'women need to be protected' so easy and seamless. Feminism might as well have been designed for perpetuating the stereotype that women's thinking is unprincipled egotism.

    • @suesally2103
      @suesally2103 3 роки тому +1

      Lucky Lady 💍

    • @massabielle2821
      @massabielle2821 2 роки тому +3

      @@suesally2103 : That mother was as sly as a fox……..knew exactly what she was doing.

    • @seleniums101
      @seleniums101 2 роки тому +8

      Sure she did but if she wanted the money she would have sold the ring and had spent it. So we don’t know the circumstances and I don’t think it’s all that fair to make assumptions like that. It sounds like her mother passed away and kept the ring the whole time so I’d wonder if it also had sentimental value to her.

  • @sallywhite7678
    @sallywhite7678 4 роки тому +146

    Even with paperwork, removal of the provenance (Van Cleef and Arpels) on the shank devalued the ring. The jeweler who sized it, butchered it.😮

    • @elenaarman-tang7811
      @elenaarman-tang7811 4 роки тому +14

      Totally agree

    • @connie3527
      @connie3527 4 роки тому +5

      Yup.

    • @YoBoyMarcus
      @YoBoyMarcus 3 роки тому +12

      Not that huge of a deal. Most of the value is in the stone.

    • @wickandde
      @wickandde 3 роки тому +15

      It happens when reheating, if its not resized by the same jeweller they can't legally put the same brand on so take it to the same jeweller you bought it from.

    • @queens6583
      @queens6583 3 роки тому +9

      Except that she has the original paperwork on the ring, so it retains it's value.

  • @mikenealon4042
    @mikenealon4042 4 роки тому +46

    THAT ROCK for a couple months marriage?!?!!??
    sheesh!, the veritable heart of the ocean

    • @23b823
      @23b823 3 роки тому +7

      Some people have so much money they couldn’t spend it if they tried

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому +1

      @17 DAP: Yes. EVERYTHING is relative.

  • @ariochiv
    @ariochiv 3 роки тому +26

    $20,000 was a LOT of money in 1970.

    • @DonLee1980
      @DonLee1980 3 роки тому

      Could have bought 2 Ferrari 250 GTO's and had money left

  • @anthonyp2506
    @anthonyp2506 4 роки тому +53

    Denny was a Baller.. Plot twist.. he's the owner of Denny's Restaurant 🤣🤣

  • @annettefindlay8076
    @annettefindlay8076 4 роки тому +101

    My favourite diamond style (Emerald Cut). Gorgeous!

    • @DamnAdriane
      @DamnAdriane 3 роки тому +10

      Yes so classy

    • @truecrimerip7936
      @truecrimerip7936 2 роки тому +2

      I am looking for a ring like this for me and badly needed to know what the cut styles name was - so I went back to this video and looked up comments. I remembered the breathtaking cit. Thanks a lot!

    • @celesasheldon6931
      @celesasheldon6931 Рік тому +2

      Beautiful my favorite cuts on 💎 are emerald and love the cushion cut as well. Emerald for party rings and cushion for engagement . Carats 20 :)

    • @CrabbinFever
      @CrabbinFever Місяць тому

      This is not an emerald cut. Smarten up.

    • @annettefindlay
      @annettefindlay Місяць тому

      What cut is it then?.

  • @theresahaines2647
    @theresahaines2647 Рік тому +26

    My sister has a ring almost identical. She worked as a administrator at a retirement home for the rich in Los Angeles, California. She found the ring close to her office. She kept the ring in a safe for 6 months as required by law. No one ever claimed the ring so my sister got to keep it. My sister always thought it was a cubic zirconia until two years later she had it appraised. It turned out to be a near flawless 4 carat total diamond ring. The appraisal was $40,000. It’s been 20 years so I’m sure the ring is far more valuable.

    • @hxhdfjifzirstc894
      @hxhdfjifzirstc894 Рік тому +1

      That's a great reason not to own jewelry that's extremely valuable.

  • @iamwindchakra
    @iamwindchakra 4 роки тому +173

    Ya'll are hateful. That ring is a beauty, and it doesn't mean the daughter is a gold digger just because her Mom was married for 5 minutes. But girl, get that ring cleaned.

    • @johngayable
      @johngayable 4 роки тому +12

      Lol.....she was a golddigger. But, good 4 her. That diamond is flawless. Not sure shes deserves it if she hasnt cleaned or insured it, tho....she seems a bit simple minded to not have.

    • @kylieknight2365
      @kylieknight2365 4 роки тому +2

      Ashleigh Sanders amen

    • @mostintrestingman7706
      @mostintrestingman7706 4 роки тому +1

      Gold digger period

    • @gerrynightingale9045
      @gerrynightingale9045 4 роки тому +2

      *Put it in a coffee-cup w/hot water and 'OxyClean' crystals, and it WILL 'Sparkle' like 'fresh from the box'*
      *The bonus being is it's cheap, cannot damage anything, and the ring is never out of your control*
      *YOU CAN'T TRUST a lot of jewelers, because many will 'swap-out' for a stone that 'looks the same' until a loupe is used
      and then find the diamond has far more imperfections than the original stone , and you can't prove a switch took place*

    • @scrapcash2421
      @scrapcash2421 3 роки тому +1

      Should have been called a toe ring because her feet were in the air more than her hands. She was a diamond digger!

  • @cuprunnethover2509
    @cuprunnethover2509 Рік тому +22

    I love the center stone. It's an absolutely beautiful ring! Yikes only married for 5 months! I don't blame her for not taking it off! I wouldn't have taken it off either! Congrats!!

  • @msbadkittie
    @msbadkittie 3 роки тому +39

    what a stunning ring! i love emerald cut diamonds. and i love Van Cleef & Arpels. her mother was smart to keep the ring.

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      Well what else was she going to do with it ? She had every right to keep the ring.

    • @Nicktrick87
      @Nicktrick87 17 днів тому

      @@lilybond6485idiot

  • @davem9445
    @davem9445 4 роки тому +90

    Looks to me that in 1971 her mom was Denny's 5/6th wife. I get the feeling Denny loves Wedding Cake. I would like to know how many wives he had after.

    • @mariarusso8239
      @mariarusso8239 4 роки тому +1

      Hello Dave how are you doing. I hope you are safe and in good health. Thank you.

    • @gretchendemasi768
      @gretchendemasi768 3 роки тому +5

      Uh is Denny still kicking? Where can I find him?

    • @davem9445
      @davem9445 3 роки тому +3

      Maria Russo hi Maria. Sorry I'm only reading your message now on Christmas Day, I hope you have had a good one, love your profile photo. Stunning woman, would love to get to know you.

    • @timw8926
      @timw8926 3 роки тому +5

      @@mariarusso8239 can you please get back to my man Dave here?

    • @mariarusso8239
      @mariarusso8239 3 роки тому

      Tim W Thank you

  • @powers1217
    @powers1217 3 роки тому +10

    I’d marry just about anyone for a couple of months to get a diamond like that.

  • @Practice_Kindness-1st
    @Practice_Kindness-1st 3 роки тому +12

    Note to self: Clean ring before having it appraised (and insured).

  • @Gannicus-USA
    @Gannicus-USA 11 місяців тому +2

    A serious jeweler would never shave off a VCA inscription

  • @gazoo-pl4nx
    @gazoo-pl4nx 4 роки тому +24

    20,000 in 1973 is about 120,000 today, so it really has not gone up in price its just devalued currency

    • @gregschaust4298
      @gregschaust4298 4 роки тому +3

      Yes, sounds about right. Diamonds, outside of rare colors or extremely large high quality stones are not investments. The best you can hope for is to break even in the long run.

    • @fortunatoofamontillado1059
      @fortunatoofamontillado1059 3 роки тому +1

      @@gregschaust4298 It fits in the palm of your hand .. a small satchel could carry a fortune .. easy to transport, store and hide..... they never decrease in value!!

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому +1

      If Debeers ever unleashed all of the diamonds that they have, the price of diamonds would go down almost to the cost of a cubic zirconium. That’s why they are holding back on sending them to market.

  • @michaelhughes3302
    @michaelhughes3302 4 роки тому +190

    "Okay, yeah... that's nice." Looks like the apple didn't fall too far from the tree.

    • @Jude74
      @Jude74 4 роки тому +5

      🤣

    • @cappystrano1
      @cappystrano1 4 роки тому +1

      Michael Hughes 😂🤣🤣🤣

    • @ssansu
      @ssansu 3 роки тому +4

      It's a flawless 5 carat square cut diamond ring from Van Cleef & Arpels and you expect her to be surprised at the appraisal estimate? Ok.

    • @Strawballs75
      @Strawballs75 3 роки тому

      🤣😂😆

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      @Michael Hughes: What is THAT supposed to mean ? “The Apple didn’t fall far from the tree”.

  • @HUDSONVINTAGE
    @HUDSONVINTAGE 3 роки тому +31

    A great example of a lovely vintage diamond ring!

  • @InuitInua
    @InuitInua 4 роки тому +34

    I would wear that all the time. Beautiful.

  • @wednesdayschild3627
    @wednesdayschild3627 3 роки тому +13

    The 70s had an art deco revival. That style is a popular art deco shape.

  • @o.h.w.6638
    @o.h.w.6638 3 роки тому +10

    Oh why didn’t someone put it on so I could see what it looks like being worn?!

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому +1

      Yes. My thought exactly. You really can’t tell what it looks like on the hand. Once on the finger -- it’s not as big as many of these commenters assume.

  • @phyllisgiardina810
    @phyllisgiardina810 4 роки тому +18

    Emerald cut, my favorite... 💕💕💕

  • @91Fierros
    @91Fierros 4 роки тому +16

    Wow she didn’t even flinch LMAO 😂 clearly has much more than that

  • @Ms7of8
    @Ms7of8 4 роки тому +42

    Exquisite; however, the ring/diamond is in desperate need of restoration, cleaning and polishing.

    • @opalfishsparklequasar8663
      @opalfishsparklequasar8663 3 роки тому

      It's clean, it's pristine, & ready to be seen.
      💎🏆💖

    • @olivernaufal
      @olivernaufal 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah very damaged surface. Clearly it’s been tumbling with other diamonds in a box.

    • @siler7
      @siler7 3 роки тому

      """"""""""desperate""""""""""

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      I would venture to say that the ring has dust on it. No way should it be altered in any way.

  • @k-dramabookgirl1574
    @k-dramabookgirl1574 4 роки тому +23

    I expected a bigger reaction when the appraiser told her the current value 😬

    • @JWebb-jp2vh
      @JWebb-jp2vh 4 роки тому +17

      Please....that heiffer has had that diamond appraised every 2 years for the last 40....100%!!!!!!

    • @NachaBeez
      @NachaBeez 3 роки тому +8

      @@JWebb-jp2vh that’s rude. No need for name calling.

    • @DBurgg
      @DBurgg 2 роки тому

      Flatliner like her mom.💍

  • @rob-merica
    @rob-merica 4 роки тому +34

    Adjusted for inflation, the item has not increased much. According to the US inflation calculator, $20k in 1973 is worth about $117,000 today.

    • @kgan4733
      @kgan4733 3 роки тому +2

      20K in 70s can buy a nice house, it'll be $1M now

  • @dancingmeerkat2078
    @dancingmeerkat2078 4 роки тому +47

    I was surprised by her comment. It sounded like she didn’t have insurance on the ring. Even if it’s stored in a safe deposit box you’d still want to have it insured.

    • @elenaarman-tang7811
      @elenaarman-tang7811 4 роки тому

      Definitely!!!

    • @Mybpeterson
      @Mybpeterson 3 роки тому +6

      Insuring jewelry is very expensive. I've let mine lapse because eventually I would've paid the same for insurance as I did for the jewelry. Approximately ten years or so depending on the piece.

    • @Marcel_Audubon
      @Marcel_Audubon 3 роки тому +3

      most people don't insure their jewelry

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому +2

      I have a friend who insured her jewelry for a couple of years but then then the cost was so ridiculous -- she found great places to hide it. It’s been about over 40 years now of clever ways to hide a significant amount of expensive jewelry. Just make sure that you tell someone you trust where it is in case you drop dead otherwise it could end up in the garbage or somewhere where no one would think to look. Just saying.

    • @cremebrulee4759
      @cremebrulee4759 2 роки тому

      If it's not insured, you don't dare wear it, so you can't even enjoy the beauty.

  • @billace90
    @billace90 4 роки тому +11

    Lady marries Lee Van Cleef and all he leaves her is a diamond?
    (Just kidding)....:)

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      OMG -- so weird. I watched a movie last night with Lee Van Cleef and Clint Eastwood.”The Good, The Bad and The Ugly”. I was wondering how many other movies he starred in as I believed this was his “one hit wonder” I just read your comment here in Nov of 2021.

  • @salinagonzalez5221
    @salinagonzalez5221 4 роки тому +7

    Hey Denny, I’m available. Size 7

  • @janis.T
    @janis.T 4 роки тому +41

    "Oh, that's nice" SERIOUSLY?????????????????? You could buy a house. Nice to wear a house on your finger.

    • @gregschaust4298
      @gregschaust4298 4 роки тому +13

      It is all relative honestly. One persons expensive is another persons average. I have a $20k ring. That is many peoples yearly salary. I worked hard to get it, as I am not filthy rich. But to me it is not ridiculous, but to others I am sure that it is. Like I said, it is all relative.

    • @paud9653
      @paud9653 4 роки тому

      janis talcott retirement if something happens

    • @StarkVandalez
      @StarkVandalez 3 роки тому +5

      what type of house do you think you'll get for 100k? and where? lol

    • @StarkVandalez
      @StarkVandalez 3 роки тому

      @@Power_Glove still not a House. condo, apartment, RV.. not a house.

    • @brawnyjust4968
      @brawnyjust4968 3 роки тому

      What if you already have a house 😂😂😂

  • @voyager1369
    @voyager1369 4 роки тому +12

    The moral of the story is never give back the diamond ladies! 🤣🤣🤣

    • @mikejones-dx8bx
      @mikejones-dx8bx 4 роки тому +6

      The moral of the story is never to buy the woman the diamond, men!

    • @exdus235
      @exdus235 4 роки тому

      @@mikejones-dx8bx 😃

    • @alidabaxter5849
      @alidabaxter5849 3 роки тому +3

      The moral really is keep the paperwork

  • @dddhhh2612
    @dddhhh2612 4 роки тому +14

    Redefines the meaning of the word "sentimental" . . .

  • @jimbob.2299
    @jimbob.2299 4 роки тому +5

    Oh..umm 80 thousand??.......That's umm........nice.......: HAHA you can tell she wanted to hear like 500k for it and didn't hear it.

  • @fishypictures
    @fishypictures 3 роки тому +6

    She didn’t flinch because she’s already loaded. That was a small number.

  • @judithvispi7778
    @judithvispi7778 3 роки тому +16

    An Emerald cut is rare and unique! Much like the one who wears it! God Bless!

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      It’s not really that rare -- it’s that the round “brilliant” cut is more desired by most women.

    • @ccubito
      @ccubito 2 роки тому +1

      Not as many women have emerald cuts because they don’t sparkle as much, but my diamond is an emeral cut. I love the shape. I think it is an elegant stone.

  • @lprzytula
    @lprzytula 3 роки тому +14

    That ring is so dirty, I thought it was full of inclusions.

    • @danseabreeze1404
      @danseabreeze1404 3 роки тому +1

      I like the dangling lone hair, shining in the daylight.

    • @queens6583
      @queens6583 3 роки тому +1

      Emerald cuts are not as brilliant as others, which is why they need to be a bigger stone to be nice.

  • @bettybourne1085
    @bettybourne1085 4 роки тому +9

    I had a Denny and he got my ring from a comic book.

    • @exdus235
      @exdus235 4 роки тому

      The gift is in the giving?

  • @janellewilliams7908
    @janellewilliams7908 Рік тому +1

    The appraiser tells her the ring is worth $120 thousand dollars and there's absolutely no reaction😴it's as if she was simply told the sun is out today😕

  • @PiranhaJaw22
    @PiranhaJaw22 4 роки тому +12

    i go denny's every weekend, i never see diamonds on the menu

    • @janedoe805
      @janedoe805 3 роки тому +1

      😂🤣😂

    • @YoBoyMarcus
      @YoBoyMarcus 3 роки тому +1

      You clearly never had the Grand Slam.

  • @greatpariscars
    @greatpariscars 4 роки тому +9

    Mummy got a sugar daddy!

  • @OOOHBILLY
    @OOOHBILLY 4 роки тому +4

    She didn’t have insurance on it already? I mean... really???

  • @NeiveVeve
    @NeiveVeve 3 роки тому +6

    She should have took a picture of the mom with her. She must have been a looker to get such a huge 💍

  • @shannonchristie7640
    @shannonchristie7640 3 роки тому +31

    My mother had this exact ring, but less carats. It’s mine now. So happy to see it here.

    • @kenc2257
      @kenc2257 3 роки тому

      This style ring/setting would look lovely with a smaller stone. The ring in this video is "Hollywood" big--quite flashy and bold--and probably would only appeal to a limited clientele.

    • @queens6583
      @queens6583 3 роки тому +3

      @@kenc2257 It's only 5 carats, which is a nice size but not enormous.

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      @Ken: It’s not really that “big”. Elizabeth Taylor’s ring is BIG. That 5 carat ring is the perfect size for many women.

    • @CapybaraMMA
      @CapybaraMMA Рік тому +1

      Must’ve been Denny’s 6th wife

  • @josephatkin3236
    @josephatkin3236 2 роки тому +5

    A Carat a month for Denny's happiness ? That sounds like a bargain!

  • @Harshulnarang1
    @Harshulnarang1 3 роки тому +5

    A 5 carat, VVS1 or 2, I colour, and at least a very good cut, V&A ring; and this one estimates $ 120k for it?! Wtf?!
    The diamond alone is worth at least four times more than that!

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      No. It’s definitely not worth more than $ 140,000.

  • @rmtmiller
    @rmtmiller 4 роки тому +27

    I'd keep it and wear it and feel reeealll good!

  • @wesjanz
    @wesjanz 4 роки тому +10

    I color VCA diamond? That’s strange

    • @tkps
      @tkps 4 роки тому +2

      I wondered that. Would they even sell an I coloured stone? Maybe bigger being better was a thing but I do find that unusual.

    • @phd2007
      @phd2007 4 роки тому

      Not really. Diamonds of this size are generally sold loose and then mounted. The husband evidently chose carat weight and clarity over color.

    • @getabiggerboat
      @getabiggerboat 4 роки тому +3

      I had a friend who was a top jeweler. He literally wrote the book about choosing stones. He preferred diamonds with some color in them because the very clear stones look a lot like Cubic Zirconia.

    • @wesjanz
      @wesjanz 4 роки тому +3

      John Marlowe this is Van Cleef and Arpels, a whole different league than your average engagement ring. They typically use only D,E,F color diamonds. They have some of the highest standards of any Jewelry House in the world when it comes to Diamonds or stones of any kind

    • @wesjanz
      @wesjanz 4 роки тому +3

      Suzanne Dulin I’m sure your friend was a wonderful jeweler but Van Cleef & Arpels are the best of the best of high end jewelery houses in the world. It is unheard of for them to use diamonds that are not colorless. And with all due respect, THEY wrote the book on choosing diamonds

  • @kristinaclark8307
    @kristinaclark8307 4 роки тому +7

    No doubt just the diamond.....the marriage lasted a few minutes! Lol!!!

  • @cylontoaster7660
    @cylontoaster7660 4 роки тому +8

    I've run Deadmines more than 100 times and Van Cleef still hasn't dropped this ring. Blizzard needs to look at adjusting the drop rate.

    • @iamborat100
      @iamborat100 4 роки тому +2

      I appreciate your joke :)

  • @romanvirec2186
    @romanvirec2186 3 роки тому +3

    I'm a gemologist and the stone doesn't look flawless to me, possibly because it's dirty but it's hard to say unless you clean the stone and inspect the stone with a loupe.

    • @JMac-27
      @JMac-27 3 роки тому

      I don't think she meant as in graded IF but flawless to the eye

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      @Roman: Agree. I would bet the stone has dust on it.

  • @MoniqueSinha
    @MoniqueSinha 3 роки тому +14

    Such a gorgeous ring ❤️

  • @dianahammond916
    @dianahammond916 2 роки тому +5

    Oh wow, I have a ring that looks almost identical to this one, however my stone is green 💚

  • @judeirwin2222
    @judeirwin2222 Рік тому +1

    Denny made a bad choice. Twenty grand for a bauble and a woman who clearly loved bling more than she loved him.

  • @Sarahhhh33
    @Sarahhhh33 4 роки тому +12

    Now where are these type of men

    • @exdus235
      @exdus235 4 роки тому +3

      On Lonely Street, at Heartbreak Hotel?

  • @lynnthompson4363
    @lynnthompson4363 4 роки тому +5

    She didn't seem to pleased at first, probably wanted half a million....

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      No. She probably has a high standard of living -- that’s why she didn’t react.

  • @ladylesleyannerowan9925
    @ladylesleyannerowan9925 3 роки тому +3

    Is the denny chap, the original owner of the U.S. Denny's restaurants? He was certainly loaded! ( uk for wealthy)

  • @knifetoucher
    @knifetoucher 3 роки тому +3

    Oof. That feeling when you lose thousands of dollars of value on a ring because your fingers are fatter than your mother's.

  • @johngayable
    @johngayable 4 роки тому +7

    Wow....beautiful....I think her mom was a bit of a gold digger.....but, good 4 her, she probably deserved it.....and that daughter isnt very smart to have not insured it before.

    • @mariarusso8239
      @mariarusso8239 4 роки тому

      Hello how are you doing John. I hope you are safe and in good health. Thank you.

  • @TheGothicdolphin
    @TheGothicdolphin Рік тому +1

    Either the diamond is filthy or as I see-full of white inclusions/pinpoints. Whatever the case may be, a diamond of the clarity the appraiser repeatedly emphasizes, would show all the facets distinctly. The entire center section of the gem is peppered with white pinpoints making it look like old weathered glass. I'd say the diamond is Si2-i1. It's also foggy. Additionally, VCA diamond solitaire rings have lengthy stamps below the setting not on the shank e.g. Marked platinum, signed 'VAN CLEEF ET ARPELS', numbered '10249CS'.

    • @huascar66
      @huascar66 Рік тому

      I don't think diamonds can be scratched, but the diamond in this ring looks very "dirty". Unimpressive and I wonder about the appraisal. Must be because the daughter had the paperwork.

    • @TheGothicdolphin
      @TheGothicdolphin Рік тому

      @@huascar66 I use to be a diamond specialist for a large retailer. Pinpoints are inside the diamond and not on the surface-as you said it's very hard to scratch a diamond without using another diamond. Also, 70's VC&A larger diamonds had serial numbers inscribed in the mounting and without the serial number (daughter claimed she had it sized thus cutting out the SN) the ring would have to sent to GIA for a reliable report. Also, no one in their right mind would have the VC&A name removed not even a jeweler. It's like erasing TIFFANY'S from a piece of jewelry. Additionally, the man wedded frequently for short-term marriages-I'm guessing he was a shyster and her mother exaggerated the story of his wealth to cover her humiliation. Gems are often popped out of a setting and the gold mountings are used for other stones. The whole story seems staged.

  • @sarahs5340
    @sarahs5340 4 роки тому +9

    Holy moly! So lovely!

  • @AndySaenz
    @AndySaenz 4 роки тому +5

    Wow, if a man gives you a rock like this, I think he’s a good man! 💍 💎

    • @mariarusso8239
      @mariarusso8239 4 роки тому

      Hello Andy how are you doing. I hope you are safe and in good health. Thank you.

  • @anderander5662
    @anderander5662 4 роки тому +19

    The diamond must be dirty because it looks terrible to me

    • @johngayable
      @johngayable 4 роки тому +3

      R u insane? Van Cleef diamonds are flawless.

    • @Rooneytunes01
      @Rooneytunes01 4 роки тому +2

      John Gay huh? That’s why she’s saying it must be dirty... bc yes, it should looks flawless

    • @lilyk7326
      @lilyk7326 4 роки тому +4

      Emerald cut is not the sparkliest cut but I love it.

    • @heaven-is-real
      @heaven-is-real 4 роки тому +2

      what's up with all the dirt on it?

    • @GABA9110
      @GABA9110 4 роки тому +3

      It needs a good cleaning but beautiful diamond

  • @Francoberry
    @Francoberry Рік тому +1

    I wish i was well off enough to say 'Thats nice 🙂' to learning something I own is worth over $100,000

  • @surudog4929
    @surudog4929 3 роки тому +2

    That 20000$ invested in stock market or housing in Bay Area, it would be worth $3-4m.

  • @sarahcahoot5444
    @sarahcahoot5444 3 роки тому +4

    I wish a man gave me a 5ct Van Cleef & Arpels engagement ring.

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      You can do it. You need to look and act what you want to attract. It’s just as easy to fall in love with a man who HAS money as it is with a man who DOESN’T have money. You want high standard of living ? You can do it.

  • @jomama5186
    @jomama5186 2 роки тому +6

    GORGEOUS. LOVE THE EMERALD CUT!

  • @2HRTS1LOVE
    @2HRTS1LOVE 4 роки тому +4

    $20k in 1970 is about $130k today. So, it's worth about what he paid for it.

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly. $20,000 back then was significant. Not so much today.

  • @melissajones6
    @melissajones6 3 роки тому +2

    Plot twist the jeweler swapped them out and this is not the van cleff. Hence why there’s no more signature.

    • @sirwill03
      @sirwill03 3 роки тому

      Yeah no. There is no way a jeweler would risk his business reputation and livelihood by switching a piece

    • @ahill4642
      @ahill4642 3 роки тому

      😛 oh that's fun

  • @sallieceelee5660
    @sallieceelee5660 3 роки тому +5

    1:06: "She was very sentimental about it. Maybe the diamond. Not so much the marriage. Not the marriage so much." Sounds like a gold digger to me.

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      Just because you can’t afford it doesn’t mean others can’t. $20,000 is a drop in the ocean for many people.

  • @justwondering1967
    @justwondering1967 4 роки тому +10

    Everyone in this comment section lives in a glass house.

  • @lotusspider7
    @lotusspider7 Місяць тому +1

    Was she was eating fish and chips when she did the appraisal?

  • @jmnf728
    @jmnf728 4 роки тому +15

    The value of diamonds is artificial, thanks to debeers.

    • @jimjam6598
      @jimjam6598 4 роки тому +1

      Nah. You don't know what you're on about.

    • @dayangmarikit6860
      @dayangmarikit6860 4 роки тому

      Every material thing has "artificial" value.

    • @nielsnielsen9013
      @nielsnielsen9013 4 роки тому

      Hara Lingayan not true

    • @1845Raven
      @1845Raven 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, hara never heard of intrinsic value

    • @gregschaust4298
      @gregschaust4298 4 роки тому +1

      The phrase uttered by every single person who couldn't afford one...........

  • @ValleyoftheRogue
    @ValleyoftheRogue Рік тому +2

    The ring looks like my mother's solitaire, only hers was much smaller at a carat and a half, flawless setting on platinum. It has much better clarity than this diamond seems to have. It is like looking through glass. I have that ring now.

  • @The19962006
    @The19962006 4 роки тому +12

    Over 5 carats Van Cleef high quality diamond only cost 80000-140000 ?! You must be kidding!

    • @RogueCylon
      @RogueCylon 3 роки тому +1

      She graded it only an I color, which is not all that great.

  • @88997799
    @88997799 4 роки тому +7

    Worth $135,000 just for the diamond today.

  • @brandonindardeo3250
    @brandonindardeo3250 4 роки тому +3

    Rich people life

  • @jbsang54
    @jbsang54 4 роки тому +8

    Just gorgeous!!

  • @tatamara7796
    @tatamara7796 4 роки тому +4

    With covid, this depreciates because today is a buyer's market on assets

    • @kylieknight2365
      @kylieknight2365 4 роки тому +2

      Leon Lapide actually no gold and precious stones especially diamonds because debeers sets the price they are even more expensive

    • @lorinking972
      @lorinking972 4 роки тому +1

      @@kylieknight2365 thank you I was about to say the same thing one thing is diamonds will never depreciate for all the blood that has been shed for them and all the heartache that they give God is still in control and only he can make a diamond. Man is so hateful.

  • @21stand8th
    @21stand8th 3 роки тому +4

    I love Antique Road show👌

  • @jcm312
    @jcm312 2 роки тому +1

    Couple of gold diggers right there!

  • @TheOnlyHatchet101
    @TheOnlyHatchet101 3 роки тому +1

    Unimpressed by it's apparent refractory index. Not an overly bright sunny day it seems, but full wavelength daylight should have shown better. I would have never invested in such a stone and the appraisal is for television viewers and ratings. Additionally, an approximation of size can be pretty far off, as it can only be hypothesized on measurement, and not weight in a mounted setting. I highly question the validity of this appraisal as well, as it does not address the fact that VC&A provided extensive paperwork with ALL details of the items they sold. There would be no guessing. Even in the 70's their items sold with a full and complete brochure. No girdle laser? Not in this lifetime. Insurance companies are smarter than that.

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому

      Wow ! A guy who knows what he is talking about. I’m impressed.

  • @welks821
    @welks821 4 роки тому +2

    No insurance on it?????????????????? smh

  • @RogueCylon
    @RogueCylon 3 роки тому +1

    She said it was very white, yet graded it I color, which is not that great.

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich4636 Рік тому

    Za Za Gabor was a wonderful star, and housekeeper. She ended up with several houses.

  • @salvationbordercountry3800
    @salvationbordercountry3800 2 роки тому +1

    Isn't that nice 🤮🤮🤮

  • @donc2446
    @donc2446 3 роки тому +28

    My mom has a very modest wedding ring. My dad gave it to her nearly 60 years ago, and they are still married. I'm so thankful and grateful for the legacy they gave me, my sisters, my children, nieces and nephew. I wouldn't trade ten of those rings for it.

    • @hurricaneaquatics
      @hurricaneaquatics 3 роки тому +8

      That's good you're happy with it because you wouldn't be able to trade 50 of them for this one.

    • @ct6410
      @ct6410 3 роки тому +3

      Wooooow, how morally superior you are! Because people who have expensive rings definitely have less valuable marriages and are less happy! 🙄🙄🙄

    • @lilybond6485
      @lilybond6485 2 роки тому +1

      Dah -- how about having the ring and the family also ? -- because there are people that have significant money and can buy valuable high end jewelry without giving a 2nd thought about it. --- AND they have a wonderful family. Everything is relative.

    • @Ddrhl
      @Ddrhl Рік тому

      Same here. My parents were married 10 days shy of 77 years when Mom passed away in 2022. I have her modest rings. We (my siblings and I, grandchildren, great grandchildren, great great grandchild, nieces and nephews as well my parents' own siblings) have been very blessed and are truly grateful.

  • @ZZ-gi3fw
    @ZZ-gi3fw 3 роки тому +1

    Meet marry expensive ring divorce sounds like an orchestrated chain of events to me

  • @bethdagenbach7020
    @bethdagenbach7020 4 роки тому +3

    Wow dream ring!

  • @nancydemoss8421
    @nancydemoss8421 3 роки тому +2

    "Oh, well that's great. That's nice."

  • @pdruiz2005
    @pdruiz2005 Рік тому

    Awww...$20,500 in 1973 dollars is $142,824.25 in 2022 dollars. That diamond ring hasn't increased much in value and at the lower estimate of $80,000 has actually DECREASED in value by over $60,000. I love that if you didn't account for inflation, you'd be happy as a clam. (Though this lady didn't buy the ring in 1973, so she doesn't have to worry about the decreased value.)

  • @davidking4779
    @davidking4779 4 роки тому +1

    Not bad for six months of marriage. After six months of marriage my son's ex-wife got $160,000. The reason for her divorcing him was that he was not attentive enough, he is a contractor and works hard.

  • @Loseinpoker
    @Loseinpoker 4 роки тому +2

    Isn't it kinda rude to ask how long the marriage lasted and laughed at her mom for keeping the diamond LOL

    • @basehead617
      @basehead617 Рік тому

      You can tell they talked about it ahead of time, she was just asking for the cameras

  • @shelleyharris2850
    @shelleyharris2850 3 роки тому +3

    Beautiful ring. Clarity. Brilliance.

  • @jameshinnant4053
    @jameshinnant4053 4 роки тому +2

    Wow I need one..

  • @dadgarage7966
    @dadgarage7966 4 роки тому +8

    "Oh. Great. That's nice."

  • @opalfishsparklequasar8663
    @opalfishsparklequasar8663 3 роки тому +1

    💎 $20K in 1970 IS equivalent to $120K now.
    So holding steady in eeal terms. 💎🏆💸😀