+Manag-Turk SLANTED-EYES I dont make any comment about their ethnic heritage! So far I know, Kazan-Tatars are ethnically descendants of the former Volga-Bulgars, which converted to Islam in the 9th century AD. I meet with them long time ago, and they told me that they are Bulgars in reality not Tatars! Maybe their ruling elites were of Kipchak speaking Tatars from the golden horde-Altin ordu! Just I said that Kazan-Tatars are good looking handsome people! Myself, Im of Khazar ethnic origin, but converted to Judaism in 740 AD together with the ruling elites under Bulan/Sabriel Khagan! After our empire with its capital Itil near the Volga river delta, at the Caspian sea, was destroyed by Svaytovslav the Rus prince from Kiew, we have been moved together with Magyars to establish the Hungarian kingdom! The first Hungarian king Arpad and his dynastie was himself of Khazar origin, closely related to the Bulgar Dulo dynastie and to Kubrat and Asparukh who founded Bulgaria in 681 AD!
Im not even Bulgar! Im a Jewish-Hungarian person, and my ancestors were those Khazars which converted under Bulan Khagan leadership to Judaism to shield themselves from other neighbouring alien people!
Friedrich Kass Strange information about Asparukh and Arpad!We have fought heavy with Khazars and Dynasty of Dulo was not related to Khazars!Reliable source of information, Please! I'm very curious!
@HFS40000 They're the same people. some remained in the volga and Urals region, others moved to Europe and crested Bulgaria and Hungary .. the Tartar language belongs to the group of Altaic Ural languages, belongs to the large group of Turkic languages ( tartar, Finnish, Hungarian and Turkish)
Volga Bulgaria (Tatar: Идел Болгар, Chuvash: Атӑлҫи Пӑлхар) or Volga-Kama Bulghar, was a historic Bulgar[2][3][4] state that existed between the 7th and 13th centuries around the confluence of the Volga and Kama River, in what is now European Russia. Volga Bulgaria was a multi-ethnic state with large numbers of Turkic Bulgars, a variety of Finnic and Ugric peoples, and many East Slavs.[5] The very strategic position of Volga Bulgaria allowed it to create a monopoly between the trade of Arabs, Norse and Avars.[6]
Вожските Българи са много красиви хора! Поздрави от Дунавска България! The Volgean Bulgarians are very beautiful people! Greetings from Danube Bulgaria! |Y|
Каква тангра бе, луд ли си, никога не сме почитали нещо такова, няма нито 1,ама нито един документ, извор, артефакт, който да ни казва, че почита е нещо такова. СПРЕТЕ ДА РАЗПРОСТРАНЯВАТЕ ТАЗИ ГНУСНА ЛЪЖА
Божественная речь и язык и мелодия! что то над земное )) слышишь и паришь .... инет преград к Господу. мне кажется что зря Русские незнают этой культуры)) поволжья Волгарей-Булгар, да и всего своего Тартарского ТуРечины - второго нашего языка!!!
@@MeteorBIG Толкова си прост че няма на къде, прави разлика от Волжи Българи и Дунавски, хората там са били премазани от русия, хазари, монголи.. и са ги принудили да се нарекат така! За да изтрията великата история на Волжка България ясно ли ти е че това е била адски напреднала и богата страна !!!! Точно това направиха Руснаците и Сърбите с Македония, геноцид и заличаване на историята!!! Всичко ке е българско да е зле... не ти ли идва малко странно, че си 5 века под турско робсто а българите дето и ние сме 5 века един вид сме ви тъпкали ???!!! Как става това аз съм в затвора с тебе ама аз съм бил началника на затвора !!! Промити мозъци !!!
Nice young ladies, handsome men. But the video is too fast. May I suggest to leave the faces on for at least 5 second for the viewers to admire the nice faces. Thanks, Sandy.
Българките са най красивите жени в света, а Българите най силните мъже и най умните- ама все едно от коя България идват.!!! Българии има много по света.!!! БОГ ДА Е С ТЯХ.!!!
@TatarTuruk Nope Volga-Tatars' origin is much complicated:) We came from different ancient ethnic tribes put together then: Bulgarians, Fenno-Ugrians, Sarmathians, and only after -Turks and even Slavs. Not every Volga-Tatar is a Turc by ethnic origin but Turkiс pseaking - yes.
Jhon Smith Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
@xTuRkMoOnStArx As for the protobulgars DNA they come from Pamir - current Afghanistan region. Their ethnicity has been found to be close to Persians rather than anything else. So even the protobulgars (that gave their name to the country although being small minority) are ethnically not turks either. Sorry but you are wrong on all counts.
And "subeg" is also turkic title, because "su" its mean army, and "beg" its mean "lord"... Subeg is a "lord of army"... The name ot river Volga, originally is called "Idel", thats mean "people of wolfs"... Neighbor country of Tatarstan is a Bashkortostan... "Bashkort" its mean "leader-wolf"... The word "subeg" or "subey" in modern turkish language, its mean "officer" in army... And wolf is a symbol of all Turkic Oguz Tribes and countries... Wiki: Old turkic script Wiki:Khazars, Karaims, Onoguria
+|Y| Marius Chivu |Y| Kimmerians/Cimmerians=Xiongnu-Huns and ancient Bulgarians! Magyars is related to old Bulgars, notably Onogur-Bulgars which became Hungarians!
Look how the Lion, staying calm and quiet, everybody is afraid of him and respect him. While a barking dog on the street everybody banishes away easily. A dog that bark doesn't bite.
Volga Bulgar's are by their very definition: a deceased race of ancient Turkic ethno-linguistic tribes of people that once shared multi-ethnic Hun-Turk-Russ genes that gave rise to mixed race Russian Empire states and Nordic-land peoples. Where do you think the Lapps came from?
TheTreize I can't understand bulgarians are not even bulgars. Also I know that turkified greeks in Turkey , they are aware who they are. So the comments don't belong them , be sure. Tatars are known as turkic people.
@deepskimi Yep... Colors of all north turkic tribes(kipchaks turks)... Also symbol "bars" - lion, the name of slavian Boris came from... All colors, symbols, flags and cultures of Asia(and maybe all of Europe) came from Kipchaks(north turks) and Oguzes(south turks). Tatars was always the major north turkic people - with their states, culture, they have fundamental role in russian history and russian culture. They saying: "Scratch a Russian and you'll find a Tatar"
Really nice people. I hope one day soon Russian Federation will collapse and Volga-Bulgaria become independent country. Best wishes for you from Croatia!
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars. The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people. Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
@LiKeThEsHaDoW he Bulgars (also Bolgars, Bulghars, Huno-Bulgars[1]) were a semi-nomadic people who flourished in the Pontic Steppe and the Volga basin in the 7th century. Ethnically, the Bulgars comprised Turkic and probably Scytho-Sarmatian elements.[2][3] They had enveloped also other ethnic groups by their migration westwards across Eurasian steppe.[4][5]
Zoroastrianism is the religion of Pashtoons from ancient time up to 2nd century BC, the only living language to old Avesta is Pashto, when I was reading the Gaths of Zoroastrian in younger Avesta, this was fascinating to me i m reading pashto poetry which is some 2500 year old.eastern iranian have influence in central asia and Ural from 7th century BC. there is possibility that Bulgarian has Pamirid/Hundu Kush origin like pashtoons.
Its a western view, that have no idea about turkic traditions and the name of turkic peoples came from. "Bulgar" its not the name of ancient people, but the name of confederation of turkic tribes - "bulgar" its mean "united" in turkic languages. The names of tribes are come from names of they rulers. In this case "bulgar" its not a name of tribe - its a name of united people of "ten tribes". Turkic name of "ten tribes" is a "on ok" - "on" its mean "ten" and "ok" its mean "civilization".
@TatarTuruk ... at the same time, in 2 different places of the world. Both named "Bulgaria", and existing without any conestions. The Volga Bulgaria was overwhelmed by the Tatars, and they mixed with them - this video is for them. The Danube Bulgaria was overwhelmed by the Ottomans, but the Bulgarian people managed to keep their identity, and to liberate themselves, with the great help of Russia. Today's Bulgarians are nice mixture of Bulgarians, Slavs, and Tracians.
@TatarTuruk why is that politics? That region was called Bulgaria much longer than it was called anything else. People don't forget their identity that easy.
Árpád-Álmos-Székely-Ügek line from Atilla (Hungarian king list) and Volga Bulgars have an Arbat,Almis, Silki, Tat - Ugek line who are also from Atilla. Ooppps XD Volga Bulgaria = Magna Hungária or Great Hun-Oguria.
HungarianHistory2 This is amazing! You mean Arpad was the son of Eltaber Almush, the one who betrayed Tangra in favour of Islam. He was the son of Shilki, is it the same in the Hungarian ruler list?? You are saying also that these are rulers after Irnik, children of Irnik?
@xTuRkMoOnStArx recent gene studies show the bulgarian genes to be close to peoples of Pamir region, distinct from turkic. They are closer to Persian which is Aryan and distint from turk ethnicity. As for the culture of Bulgars it is distinctly not turk either in Volga Bulgaria region nor Danube Bulgaria. The only point of similarity is islam but that was adopted much later in 9th century by Volga Bulgaria. That was influence from arabs, however and had nothing to do with turks or mongols
Do you know what does it means IYI? Can you read these symbols? Or you onlu know that this symbol is a symbol of Onoguria(with founder Khan Koubrat)? Do you know that Y is a symbol of Khazars? And also of the european tribes of the Khazars - Karai people in Lithuania and Poland? Look at Old Turkic Scripts for checking, what i will write bellow: I its reading "SU" and is a letter "S" - its mean "army", Y its reading "EL" and is a letter "L" - its mean "people" Bulgarians have a title "subeg"...
@elfiarussia hahah i live in germany and i speak german lang..& i am not German :) My Motherlanguage is Tatarian Turkic :) The AFROamericans speaking English and the Motherlangugae is African :) The National lanugague from Tatars is Tatarian...And the ethnic origin is Turkic/Turk :)
....Much of the population survived, and there was a certain degree of mixing between it and the Kipchak Tatars of the Horde during the ensuing period. The group as a whole accepted the ethnonym "Tatars" (finally in the end of 19th century; although the name Bulgars persisted in some places; " wikipedia "tatars"
OK, STAY TATAR, TURKIC OR WHATEVER YOU WANT AND DON'T TRY TO STEAL MY NAME "BULGARIAN " ,WHICH I USE LAST 1400 YEARS, BUT YOU DON'T!! I NEVER CHANGED MY NAME (1400 YEARS) BUT YOU DID IT, AND EVEN NOW-- CLAIMING THAT YOU ARE TURC!!
Kazan Balası You usually talk in favour of Bulgaria! Why do you change that??? There are some Slavs here, but Bulgars too, hence the name of the country - Bulgaria!
Kazan Balası You can say whatever you want-- it is irrelevant!Who are you?! I'm Bulgarian, I have NOT and DIDN'T change the name of my country for almost 1400 years! Danube Bulgaria is extension of the "Old Great Bulgaria " (and the only surviving country from so many called themselves "Bulgaria") Even today, still a lot of people in Kazan, pretending to be "Bulgars" they are missing something very important-- in your own national flag-- a big, clearly visible letter "T" standing for.....,yes,Tartars!! Or, maybe, Turks??🤫🤔 There is NO letter "T" in the word "Bulgar(ian)?!😂 Do you see any letter "T" in the name of my Country?😂🤯Not, at least for (almost) 1400 years! What I'm is simply not your business-- I'm what I'm and I use the name "Bulgarian" with the highest amount of pride! Until 15 years ago(or so) you simply called yourself "tartar" ,as anyone calling you with the same name for many centuries!? But, all of sudden, with a lot of money from turkey you started to beat the "Bulgar" drum very loud! Whoever (Bulgars) lived in Volga Bulgaria is gone long, LONG centuries ago! Your great grandfather, the Mongolo/Tartarian Subibey and his horde slaughtered "Bulgars" and slowly substituted them with "tartarians" ,who proudly called themselves "turks" -- look at the Crimean Tartars how straight and honestly are saying "we are turks" ,skipping the theater and drama of trying to "pretend" to be "Bulgars" !At least they (the Crimean Tartars) have some honor and pride!Do you have any left?? Or just another pathetic example of lost national identity and social "schizophrenia"🤯 with the UNanswered fundamental question-- Who am I, the Kazan tartarian??🤔🤫 Did I answer your question??😜 P.S. Look carefully, very carefully, at the picture of three girls in the beginning-- two "tartarian" "turk" faces are eye catching immediately (left and center),and the girl on the right is (at least) half Russian- look her wide open, nonasian eyes!👍 I know who I am very well-- the word "tribe" doesn't exist in my land for more than 1000 years-- the word "Nation" exists for many, many centuries-- how many other countries can say, and prove, the same??🤔🤫
Thank you, my friend! No, he is, just historically we struggled too much on the same land and same place and we've lost much of our awareness of others like us. You would understand... Remember that your first capital was Bulgar, with our ethnic name! Ours was Pliska, a Slavic city-name. Then Preslav -=- Slavic name too. There is an attempt to prove the name was not just Pliska, but the city was known as Pliska for centuries!
@TatarTuruk they were many different West African Languages some Nomadic like Songhay, Mande, Hausa,Mossi and Soninkai (my language) and some non Nomadic like Ashanti , Ewe , Ibo there was a very long African War Nomads VS Non-Nomads thats hiw Slavery came to place.
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars. The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people. Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
Борис Атанасов You know what is so funny about this general assumption that Central Asian Turks are “pure” (if purity in this world even exists)? The fact that they are not “pure”! Kazakhs have major Mongolian ancestry and the rest of Central Asians look nothing like the picture people have of Central Asians. When people think of Central Asians, they think of people that look full on Chinese or Korean.. well sorry, but that is not what Uzbeks, Turkmen etc. look like at all. Look at Uzbeks, Turkmens, Uyghurs... This is what Central Asian settlers to West Asia and Southeast Europe looked like. So what now it turns out they do not look Chinese? Are these not “real Turks” either? Weren’t the only “real Turks” that looked East Asiatic the Central Asians or am I hallucinating? The only reason Kazakhs, as I already pointed out, look more East Asiatic is that they have a lot of Mongolian admixture. The rest of the Turks do not look like Mongolians, Koreans, Chinese, Japanese or whatsoever because we are not them, but a seperate people; Turks. Anyway, let’s get to the second general assumption: “Turks’ Central Asian ancestry is diluted due to the excessive amount of slaves in the Ottoman empire.” I find it interesting since most Ottoman slaves came from Ukraine and Russia… and genetics studies show we have no genetic relationship to them. Another source were the Circassians… and genetic studies show we do have a genetic relationship to them, but the relationship dates back to thousands of years ago due to the ancient Anatolians and is not related to Circassian slaves. Syrians, same story as Circassians. The Ancient Anatolians were a mixture of three genetically different peoples: Anatolians that had migrated from the Caucasus, Anatolians that had migrated from the Balkan and Anatolians that had migrated from the northern Levant. Our genetic relationship dates back thousands of years ago and has nothing to do with slaves. Many many Nubians were also enslaved, yet there is not a genetic relationship to them at all. Barbary slavery? Why do people even think the Ottomans were responsible for that? Ottoman North Africa was relatively independent and ruled by regencies. Matter of fact, until 1830 69% of Ottoman Algeria was not even under practical Ottoman rule as the local tribes refused to obey the regencies, Deys, Beys, Ağas and Janissaries. The local and coastal North Africans absorbed some slaves and the rest died without producing any off-spring. Let me remind you: anticonception already existed back then! By the way, the Barbary slave trade was actually not only perpetrated by Berbers, but also Dutch and English Christians and converts to Islam. Why? Because they (Protestants) wanted to attack Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and French villages (Catholic). The only reason Turks are 20-50% descended from Turkmen is that the Christians of Anatolia converted to Islam and married the Turks. Most of these Christians, especially in the first four centuries of Turkish presence in West Asia and Southeast Europe, converted because they totally disliked the Byzantine empire that tried to assimilate all its minorities and was very corrupt. Matter of fact, many Christians remained Christian and joined the Turks because they, in contrary to the Byzantines, allowed them to retain and preserve their identity. The Ottoman state is known to have started as a confederation of Muslim Warriors (Gâzi) and peasants looking for Holy War, and Christians as well as recent converts to Islam. Even royal Byzantine Greeks converted to Islam and joined the Turks! Examples are Köse Mihal, member of the Palaiologos dynasty. He converted to Islam and contributed to the development of the Ottoman state. John Tzelepes Komnenos was the nephew of the Byzantine emperor, he tried to overthrow him, failed and subsequently converted to Islam. In addition, he married the daughter of Seljuk Sultan Mesud I. Ever wondered why Ottomans easily took over the Balkans? They faced little resistance. For example, Serbian peasants mostly did not assist their Lords in fighting the Ottomans because they had simply better lives under Ottoman rule. Serbs enforced the feudal system with Lords of noble descent that could not be punished, were allowed to exploit the peasants and impose limitless taxes. In the Ottoman empire this was not the case. There was the timar system, were “lords” had lmited rule, there was a strong centralized character, timar-holders could be punished if they abused their power and could not impose limitless taxes. In addition, Serbian serfs had to work 2 days a week under Serbian feudal rule, but only 3 days a year under Ottoman rule. Another thing : Christians did not have to serve the empire! They did not go to war thus never lost any male relatives to war. This is also the reason Christians were the richest group in the empire; they never lost cash earners. During the later centuries of Ottoman rule, Christians converted to Islam because they could not afford the higher taxes which were a result of external as well as internal issues, or they wanted to inherit their family’s entire wealth (a convert to Islam would inherit his parents’ entire wealth after they died and not his Christian siblings) and some other reasons. In addition, others were proselytized and thus were convinced that Islam is the “only right” faith. It is a wholly anti-Turkish and inaccurate assumption that we are descended from slaves that were raped by the Turks. Matter of fact, rape was an offence and punishable by death or mutilation and slaves had many rights. Please don’t think Ottoman slaves were treated the exact same way as those in the Americas, almost all of our empresses and statesmen were even of slave origin. And let’s also not forget that slaves were not only owned by Turks… but also other Muslims and Christians! Anyway, why would I want to marry a Central Asian to “regain” their appearance? Let me ask the question differently : Why don’t modern Europeans, Asians and Americans go and marry Ethiopians and other East Africans to regain the appearance of their ancestors that lived 200,000 years ago? That’s a sufficient answer in itself. Are German people English? Are Spanish people French? Are Georgian peeople Armenian? No. They are not. Turks are not Mongolian, Mongols are not Turkish etc. Yes, they were neighbors for a long time. They co-existed in Xiongnu, Turks were the "blacksmith vassals" of Xianbei and Rouran, however they are not the same. Turk,Mongol and Tungus are the three nations of Central Asia. They share similar culture, similar in appearance (maybe except Manchu and Oghuz) but they are not the same. Ebu'l Gazi Bakhadur Khan, a historian and a khan of Khiva in 17th century says, in his book Sagara-i Turki , that Abulca Khan of steppes had two sons. One was Tatar and one was Mogol. Descendants of Tatar became the Mongols and descendants of Mogol became the Turks. Even though some igno’rant, or rather un’educated tr’olls often attempt to use the word “Mongol” as an insult material against the Turks around the internet, the Turks are not Mongols, and the Mongols are not Turks. The Great Hunnic Empire was the first example of the Turco-Mongol political unity. There was a substantial amount of Mongol tribes inside the empire. Later, the Turco-Mongol state tradition and steppe culture continued to influence the European Huns, Göktürk State, and the Uyghur Khanate, as well as the Mongolian Empire after Ghengis Khan ensured the unity of tribes. Since the Hunnic dominance until the rise of Ghengis, the Turks had been the winning party of the Turco-Mongol struggle. The dense waves of Mongol incursions forced many Turkoman tribes in Central Asia to join Ghengis’ army. In other words, the influence of Turk ethnos, culture and language increased, and expanded to many regions of the Middle East. The Golden Horde (Kıpchak country and Western Siberia), Chagatai khanates, Transoxiana and East Turkistan completely evolved into Turco-Islamic states. Timurid Empire also preserved the Turco-Mongol tradition. In summary, the Mongol state tradition had originated from the old Turks, and reached to the Ottomans because of the Mongols as well. Today, there are also many historical and cultural connections between Turkey and Mongolia. Valuable artifacts on the fields of archeology, philology and anthropology that enlightens the history of the Turks, including the Orkhon inscriptions, the most significant source for Turkish history, culture and language, are located in Mongolia. The Turks and Mongolians lived together in a vast geography for centuries.
@elfiarussia :) lol afroamericans mother language were not english .. and tatar people origin belong to old bolgar turkic people .. and language from turkic oghur branch ..
Девушку в школе учили тому, что ее предки пришли из Монголии))) А она смотрела на своих родных и не могла понять, как же такое может быть))) Учите , господа, матчасть, и не тычьтесь в псевдоисторию, сочиненную немцами Петра Первого))
@lukrecian actually there is no real proof that bulgarian sovereigns were referred to as "khans". there are mentions of "kanasubigi" which means "ruler from god" and "archon" which is in greek texts and is the greek term for monarch. But there was an assumption that they were called khans which is really not borne out by facts. With Boris I they started being called "knyaz" which is the equivalent of king and subsequently with Simeon I "tsar" which is the equivalent of emperor.
А днес Тракия ли се казваме или България, приятелю? :) В нашия съвременен български народ много народи са оставили гените си и траките с едни от тях. Ние носим името на народа, който тогава е бил по-силен и е знаел как се ръководи държава :)
@TatarTuruk I already told you, but to speak with you is the same like to speak with a radio - you may repeat one and the same thing forever. Read something about the Bulgarian history - read in wikipedia, if you can't find another sourses. Read something different from the Turkish history books you strudy in school. Bulgarians are people with own identity. Where they moved to live, they created a country, and they named it to the name of the nation - Bulgaria. There were 2 Bulgarias
The name og tribe "kutrigur" is came from the name of Khan Kotrag - son of Khan Kubrat(Kurt). Khan Asparuh, founder of Danubian Bulgars is also son of Khan Kurt. Name of tatars(tartars) came from turkic word adn its mean "last child", because this state is a last turkic state. Name of Selchuk Empire came from name of Selchuk Khan, Ottoman Empire - from Osman Beg, Azerbaidzan - from Azer Khan, Ozbekistan - from Ozu Beg Khan... Only the names of confederations are different...
@bipkatr Shto se otnasq do imeto na Omurtag... "Omur" na turski znachi "grubnak", a dumata "tag", oznachava "planina". Ne si izmislqjte termini i chujdici, za da se izkarate ne-turki... Ako iskate da nauchite neshto poveche za predcite si, nqma da e zle da imate pone elementarni poznaniq po turski ezik, zashtoto tova e edinstveniq nachin da razberete ostavenite pismeni dokumenti ot velikite vi predci... Naj-malkoto ot uvajenie kum titlata im "Kan", koqto na turski oznachava "kruv, roda".
@TatarTuruk I DO:) And there're no Crimean Tatars in my videos, only VolgaTatars.. You should study more on genetics and anthropology, mate:) No any offence.
Булгары - это тюркское племя. Прочитайте Махмуда Кашгари, он в 11 веке описал тюркский язык булгар и до сих пор нынешние татары урезают окончания слов, как и булгары. Так что не важно как нас называть - мы тюрки.
Kazan Tatars( Bulgars) are a good looking beautiful people!
+Manag-Turk SLANTED-EYES I dont make any comment about their ethnic heritage! So far I know, Kazan-Tatars are ethnically descendants of the former Volga-Bulgars, which converted to Islam in the 9th century AD. I meet with them long time ago, and they told me that they are Bulgars in reality not Tatars! Maybe their ruling elites were of Kipchak speaking Tatars from the golden horde-Altin ordu! Just I said that Kazan-Tatars are good looking handsome people! Myself, Im of Khazar ethnic origin, but converted to Judaism in 740 AD together with the ruling elites under Bulan/Sabriel Khagan! After our empire with its capital Itil near the Volga river delta, at the Caspian sea, was destroyed by Svaytovslav the Rus prince from Kiew, we have been moved together with Magyars to establish the Hungarian kingdom! The first Hungarian king Arpad and his dynastie was himself of Khazar origin, closely related to the Bulgar Dulo dynastie and to Kubrat and Asparukh who founded Bulgaria in 681 AD!
Im not even Bulgar! Im a Jewish-Hungarian person, and my ancestors were those Khazars which converted under Bulan Khagan leadership to Judaism to shield themselves from other neighbouring alien people!
Friedrich Kass Strange information about Asparukh and Arpad!We have fought heavy with Khazars and Dynasty of Dulo was not related to Khazars!Reliable source of information, Please!
I'm very curious!
@HFS40000 They're the same people. some remained in the volga and Urals region, others moved to Europe and crested Bulgaria and Hungary .. the Tartar language belongs to the group of Altaic Ural languages, belongs to the large group of Turkic languages ( tartar, Finnish, Hungarian and Turkish)
@@friedrichkass1644 arpad Kagan was member of the dulo clan descending from attila son ernik
Volga Bulgaria (Tatar: Идел Болгар, Chuvash: Атӑлҫи Пӑлхар) or Volga-Kama Bulghar, was a historic Bulgar[2][3][4] state that existed between the 7th and 13th centuries around the confluence of the Volga and Kama River, in what is now European Russia. Volga Bulgaria was a multi-ethnic state with large numbers of Turkic Bulgars, a variety of Finnic and Ugric peoples, and many East Slavs.[5] The very strategic position of Volga Bulgaria allowed it to create a monopoly between the trade of Arabs, Norse and Avars.[6]
Поздрав от България. Greetings from Bulgaria!
Здрасти от дунавска българия град пловдив...
Вожските Българи са много красиви хора! Поздрави от Дунавска България! The Volgean Bulgarians are very beautiful people! Greetings from Danube Bulgaria! |Y|
С горячим приветом из Марий-Эл братья татары
Много красиви девойки..
Привет Волжие Булгари.Тангра с вами iYi
Каква тангра бе, луд ли си, никога не сме почитали нещо такова, няма нито 1,ама нито един документ, извор, артефакт, който да ни казва, че почита е нещо такова. СПРЕТЕ ДА РАЗПРОСТРАНЯВАТЕ ТАЗИ ГНУСНА ЛЪЖА
@@СтоянКарамихалев-х4ыима,имааа,и в Ватикана се пазат документите!има Тангризъм и до наши дни,в фолклора ни!-но всичко се грижливо прикрива в дун.Бг.
👍🇧🇬👆✊ТЕНГРИ вел их❤️🙏
Honestly, who cares were they're from. They're cool people.
O_o Lol amazing similarity with people from Bulgaria (Danube)
Божественная речь и язык и мелодия! что то над земное )) слышишь и паришь .... инет преград к Господу. мне кажется что зря Русские незнают этой культуры)) поволжья Волгарей-Булгар, да и всего своего Тартарского ТуРечины - второго нашего языка!!!
Поздрав за всички чувстващи себе си българи. Съединението прави силата, нас ни разделиха.
tatar
Обичам ви, братя и сестри-ВОЛЖКИ БЪЛГАРИ.
Tatar girls are cute :3
Elfia, this song is so beautiful! Thank you!!
Всегда уважал татарский народ. Красивые у вас девушки. Даже очень) Респект от азербайджанца
Ты сам татарин вас армяне так называют, а мы булгары
Поздрав от Дунавска България, братя и сестри! ❤️
Greetings from.Bulgaria
Many good looking handsome boys, the are really beautiful people!
Beautiful picture beautiful music💙👌😊
sizlar Turksizlar,unutmaglar.
Aynen kardeşim
Тартаристан са българи, всички сме братия и систри СЛАВА България и СЛАВА Тартаристан!!
Odamna vi vikame deka ste tatari ama ne veruvate ;)
@@MeteorBIG Толкова си прост че няма на къде, прави разлика от Волжи Българи и Дунавски, хората там са били премазани от русия, хазари, монголи.. и са ги принудили да се нарекат така! За да изтрията великата история на Волжка България ясно ли ти е че това е била адски напреднала и богата страна !!!! Точно това направиха Руснаците и Сърбите с Македония, геноцид и заличаване на историята!!! Всичко ке е българско да е зле... не ти ли идва малко странно, че си 5 века под турско робсто а българите дето и ние сме 5 века един вид сме ви тъпкали ???!!! Как става това аз съм в затвора с тебе ама аз съм бил началника на затвора !!! Промити мозъци !!!
@@MeteorBIG абе шо да речиш џабе е. Умот не им идет ха ха ха
@@emeralddragongaming2930 ako de.
Ko seks e ova. Si gi dupis , a sekoj nareden pat si se predstsvuvaat ko devici , ili, " vtor pat mi e'.
@@MeteorBIG втор, втор, не се до "толку " ха ха
Nice young ladies, handsome men. But the video is too fast. May I suggest to leave the faces on for at least 5 second for the viewers to admire the nice faces. Thanks, Sandy.
Much respect to these tough fighters and beautiful ladies.
Българките са най красивите жени в света, а Българите най силните мъже и най умните- ама все едно от коя България идват.!!!
Българии има много по света.!!!
БОГ ДА Е С ТЯХ.!!!
Bonjour à tous les tatars. Elle chante très bien, d'ailleurs la chanson est belle.
@TatarTuruk Nope Volga-Tatars' origin is much complicated:) We came from different ancient ethnic tribes put together then: Bulgarians, Fenno-Ugrians, Sarmathians, and only after -Turks and even Slavs. Not every Volga-Tatar is a Turc by ethnic origin but Turkiс pseaking - yes.
Cool! The Volga river is as well the home of the proto indo european people so called Yamnaya.
Българките са най красивите жени в света!!
The BULGARS were TURKIC semi-nomadic warrior tribe.
Jhon Smith
Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
love to all my relatives - they came from the Ural. Grandma was an Eastonian lady, Grandpa Polish Sarmatian.
Польский сармат - кто это?
is that a question?
1) turk is an undefined term in terms of ethnicity. it is a linguistic group only
2) i never said tatars are arabs
@xTuRkMoOnStArx
As for the protobulgars DNA they come from Pamir - current Afghanistan region. Their ethnicity has been found to be close to Persians rather than anything else. So even the protobulgars (that gave their name to the country although being small minority) are ethnically not turks either. Sorry but you are wrong on all counts.
Привет из дунайской Болгарии, братья булгары! Все мы потомки одного кана Кубрата и как видно, его ген оставил красивый след :)
Привет ! из татарстана. 😊😊
just like Eastern European..
Yes, surely Tatar people are Eastern European..
And "subeg" is also turkic title, because "su" its mean army, and "beg" its mean "lord"...
Subeg is a "lord of army"...
The name ot river Volga, originally is called "Idel", thats mean "people of wolfs"...
Neighbor country of Tatarstan is a Bashkortostan...
"Bashkort" its mean "leader-wolf"...
The word "subeg" or "subey" in modern turkish language, its mean "officer" in army...
And wolf is a symbol of all Turkic Oguz Tribes and countries...
Wiki: Old turkic script
Wiki:Khazars, Karaims, Onoguria
красивая нация
Татары красивы не только снаружи но и внутри!
@TatarTuruk
"Tatar" was a term imposed over by Stalin. Before him these people called themselves Bulgar.
Nice job bravo from New York 💪🇧🇬 кой сиго може сиго може 🔥🔥🔥
Tatar language and Bulgarian language are not . similar ..and tatars are strict Muslims..Tatar and Turkish language are similar..bulgars are gypsy..
+James Green Bulgarians are not gypsy ethnically! Gypsy are Indians, Pakistani, Bangladeshi origin!
+|Y| Marius Chivu |Y| Kimmerians/Cimmerians=Xiongnu-Huns and ancient Bulgarians! Magyars is related to old Bulgars, notably Onogur-Bulgars which became Hungarians!
Look how the Lion, staying calm and quiet, everybody is afraid of him and respect him. While a barking dog on the street everybody banishes away easily. A dog that bark doesn't bite.
Wonderful and healthy people ! some ladies could easily be Italian (or even Corsican, my island)) !
Hello everybody my brothers.from Azerbaijan
Volga Bulgar's are by their very definition: a deceased race of ancient Turkic ethno-linguistic tribes of people that once shared multi-ethnic Hun-Turk-Russ genes that gave rise to mixed race Russian Empire states and Nordic-land peoples. Where do you think the Lapps came from?
Lol Bulgarian Slavs and turkified Greeks trying to claim the Tatar people as "theirs". Hilarious.
TheTreize I can't understand bulgarians are not even bulgars. Also I know that turkified greeks in Turkey , they are aware who they are. So the comments don't belong them , be sure. Tatars are known as turkic people.
@deepskimi
Yep...
Colors of all north turkic tribes(kipchaks turks)...
Also symbol "bars" - lion, the name of slavian Boris came from...
All colors, symbols, flags and cultures of Asia(and maybe all of Europe) came from Kipchaks(north turks) and Oguzes(south turks).
Tatars was always the major north turkic people - with their states, culture, they have fundamental role in russian history and russian culture.
They saying:
"Scratch a Russian and you'll find a Tatar"
GREATİNG FROM TURKEY
Really nice people. I hope one day soon Russian Federation will collapse and
Volga-Bulgaria become independent country. Best wishes for you from Croatia!
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars.
The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people.
Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
Make Bulgaria Great Again 💪🇧🇬
Don't ever wish for Russia to collapse, that's a horrible thing
@@mihailnikoloff2554 Помечтай, ха-ха))
@@mihailnikoloff2554 нет, чуваши не булгары!
@LiKeThEsHaDoW he Bulgars (also Bolgars, Bulghars, Huno-Bulgars[1]) were a semi-nomadic people who flourished in the Pontic Steppe and the Volga basin in the 7th century. Ethnically, the Bulgars comprised Turkic and probably Scytho-Sarmatian elements.[2][3] They had enveloped also other ethnic groups by their migration westwards across Eurasian steppe.[4][5]
@Barsbij Thanks for the nice comments ! Many peoples here can not reading :) TATARstan :)
Min Törek-Tatar Kum Bulgar deyil !!
Zoroastrianism is the religion of Pashtoons from ancient time up to 2nd century BC, the only living language to old Avesta is Pashto, when I was reading the Gaths of Zoroastrian in younger Avesta, this was fascinating to me i m reading pashto poetry which is some 2500 year old.eastern iranian have influence in central asia and Ural from 7th century BC. there is possibility that Bulgarian has Pamirid/Hundu Kush origin like pashtoons.
Who’s the handsome guy in the third to last photo in the end?!
Братцы дежите болгарское имя. Мы самы крепкий народ в мире. Поздравляю с Дунавской Болгарии! Живи и здрави!
You asked "You are Bulgarians?"
What kind of dumb question is that. If we live in Bulgaria what do you think we should call ourselves?
Its a western view, that have no idea about turkic traditions and the name of turkic peoples came from.
"Bulgar" its not the name of ancient people, but the name of confederation of turkic tribes - "bulgar" its mean "united" in turkic languages. The names of tribes are come from names of they rulers. In this case "bulgar" its not a name of tribe - its a name of united people of "ten tribes". Turkic name of "ten tribes" is a "on ok" - "on" its mean "ten" and "ok" its mean "civilization".
@TatarTuruk
... at the same time, in 2 different places of the world. Both named "Bulgaria", and existing without any conestions. The Volga Bulgaria was overwhelmed by the Tatars, and they mixed with them - this video is for them. The Danube Bulgaria was overwhelmed by the Ottomans, but the Bulgarian people managed to keep their identity, and to liberate themselves, with the great help of Russia. Today's Bulgarians are nice mixture of Bulgarians, Slavs, and Tracians.
@TatarTuruk
why is that politics? That region was called Bulgaria much longer than it was called anything else. People don't forget their identity that easy.
Árpád-Álmos-Székely-Ügek line from Atilla (Hungarian king list) and Volga Bulgars have an Arbat,Almis, Silki, Tat - Ugek line who are also from Atilla. Ooppps XD Volga Bulgaria = Magna Hungária or Great Hun-Oguria.
Interesing, we SIlesian people in us knowlage word Hungar not coming from Hun-Oguria, only Un-gar, Ten-Arrows (10 clans) and Magar was one of.
HungarianHistory2 This is amazing! You mean Arpad was the son of Eltaber Almush, the one who betrayed Tangra in favour of Islam. He was the son of Shilki, is it the same in the Hungarian ruler list?? You are saying also that these are rulers after Irnik, children of Irnik?
sekel is turkic-Ugric.
but magyar is only ugric.
@xTuRkMoOnStArx
recent gene studies show the bulgarian genes to be close to peoples of Pamir region, distinct from turkic. They are closer to Persian which is Aryan and distint from turk ethnicity. As for the culture of Bulgars it is distinctly not turk either in Volga Bulgaria region nor Danube Bulgaria. The only point of similarity is islam but that was adopted much later in 9th century by Volga Bulgaria. That was influence from arabs, however and had nothing to do with turks or mongols
Do you know what does it means IYI?
Can you read these symbols?
Or you onlu know that this symbol is a symbol of Onoguria(with founder Khan Koubrat)?
Do you know that Y is a symbol of Khazars?
And also of the european tribes of the Khazars - Karai people in Lithuania and Poland?
Look at Old Turkic Scripts for checking, what i will write bellow:
I its reading "SU" and is a letter "S" - its mean "army",
Y its reading "EL" and is a letter "L" - its mean "people"
Bulgarians have a title "subeg"...
this is pure aids but i love it, love from sweden
@elfiarussia hahah i live in germany and i speak german lang..& i am not German :) My Motherlanguage is Tatarian Turkic :)
The AFROamericans speaking English and the Motherlangugae is African :)
The National lanugague from Tatars is Tatarian...And the ethnic origin is Turkic/Turk :)
@TatarTuruk do you mean Turkic-SPEAKING people? :))) Nope. I'm not of Russian origin.
....Much of the population survived, and there was a certain degree of mixing between it and the Kipchak Tatars of the Horde during the ensuing period. The group as a whole accepted the ethnonym "Tatars" (finally in the end of 19th century; although the name Bulgars persisted in some places; "
wikipedia "tatars"
Which song?
@elfiarussia you say you make not to speak politics :) DELETE (Volga-Bulgar) :)
Your eyes is nice i have blue eyes =)
I AM TATAR, I AM TURKIC!!
OK, STAY TATAR, TURKIC OR WHATEVER YOU WANT AND DON'T TRY TO STEAL MY NAME "BULGARIAN " ,WHICH I USE LAST 1400 YEARS, BUT YOU DON'T!!
I NEVER CHANGED MY NAME (1400 YEARS) BUT YOU DID IT, AND EVEN NOW-- CLAIMING THAT YOU ARE TURC!!
Kazan Balası You usually talk in favour of Bulgaria! Why do you change that??? There are some Slavs here, but Bulgars too, hence the name of the country - Bulgaria!
Kazan Balası What kind of answer you want from me?What is your question(s)??
Kazan Balası You can say whatever you want-- it is irrelevant!Who are you?!
I'm Bulgarian, I have NOT and DIDN'T change the name of my country for almost 1400 years!
Danube Bulgaria is extension of the "Old Great Bulgaria " (and the only surviving country from so many called themselves "Bulgaria")
Even today, still a lot of people in Kazan, pretending to be "Bulgars" they are missing something very important-- in your own national flag-- a big, clearly visible letter "T" standing for.....,yes,Tartars!!
Or, maybe, Turks??🤫🤔
There is NO letter "T" in the word "Bulgar(ian)?!😂
Do you see any letter "T" in the name of my Country?😂🤯Not, at least for (almost) 1400 years!
What I'm is simply not your business-- I'm what I'm and I use the name "Bulgarian" with the highest amount of pride!
Until 15 years ago(or so) you simply called yourself "tartar" ,as anyone calling you with the same name for many centuries!?
But, all of sudden, with a lot of money from turkey you started to beat the "Bulgar" drum very loud!
Whoever (Bulgars) lived in Volga Bulgaria is gone long, LONG centuries ago!
Your great grandfather, the Mongolo/Tartarian Subibey and his horde slaughtered "Bulgars" and slowly substituted them with "tartarians" ,who proudly called themselves "turks" -- look at the Crimean Tartars how straight and honestly are saying "we are turks" ,skipping the theater and drama of trying to "pretend" to be "Bulgars" !At least they (the Crimean Tartars) have some honor and pride!Do you have any left?? Or just another pathetic example of lost national identity and social "schizophrenia"🤯 with the UNanswered fundamental question-- Who am I, the Kazan tartarian??🤔🤫
Did I answer your question??😜
P.S. Look carefully, very carefully, at the picture of three girls in the beginning-- two "tartarian" "turk" faces are eye catching immediately (left and center),and the girl on the right is (at least) half Russian- look her wide open, nonasian eyes!👍
I know who I am very well-- the word "tribe" doesn't exist in my land for more than 1000 years-- the word "Nation" exists for many, many centuries-- how many other countries can say, and prove, the same??🤔🤫
Thank you, my friend!
No, he is, just historically we struggled too much on the same land and same place and we've lost much of our awareness of others like us. You would understand... Remember that your first capital was Bulgar, with our ethnic name! Ours was Pliska, a Slavic city-name. Then Preslav -=- Slavic name too. There is an attempt to prove the name was not just Pliska, but the city was known as Pliska for centuries!
@TatarTuruk no brother they were turkic volga bolgars
името на песента моля? :)
@TatarTuruk they were many different West African Languages some Nomadic like Songhay, Mande, Hausa,Mossi and Soninkai (my language) and some non Nomadic like Ashanti , Ewe , Ibo there was a very long African War Nomads VS Non-Nomads thats hiw Slavery came to place.
Много красиви жени :)
Very nice song! I like it very much!!
Free Tatarstan!
Еще же есть Сибирские татары!В северной части Сибири очень много сибирских татар!
tatar kardeslere almanyadan cok cok selamlar
Beautiful TURKISH people! :)
Mister Sanchez your mom yes
Chuvash people are descendants of the Volga Bulgars.
The Bulgars were Scytho-Iranian tribe (with possible turkic influence) but they are not turkic people.
Bulgarians and Chuvashs are distant cousins.
DarkShadow64 Turkish- MY ASS!
Борис Атанасов *ahahahha you fucking idiot im Tatar and we are TURK and Cumans were Turkic you fucking ignorant*
Борис Атанасов You know what is so funny about this general assumption that Central Asian Turks are “pure” (if purity in this world even exists)? The fact that they are not “pure”! Kazakhs have major Mongolian ancestry and the rest of Central Asians look nothing like the picture people have of Central Asians.
When people think of Central Asians, they think of people that look full on Chinese or Korean.. well sorry, but that is not what Uzbeks, Turkmen etc. look like at all. Look at Uzbeks, Turkmens, Uyghurs...
This is what Central Asian settlers to West Asia and Southeast Europe looked like.
So what now it turns out they do not look Chinese? Are these not “real Turks” either? Weren’t the only “real Turks” that looked East Asiatic the Central Asians or am I hallucinating?
The only reason Kazakhs, as I already pointed out, look more East Asiatic is that they have a lot of Mongolian admixture. The rest of the Turks do not look like Mongolians, Koreans, Chinese, Japanese or whatsoever because we are not them, but a seperate people; Turks.
Anyway, let’s get to the second general assumption: “Turks’ Central Asian ancestry is diluted due to the excessive amount of slaves in the Ottoman empire.”
I find it interesting since most Ottoman slaves came from Ukraine and Russia… and genetics studies show we have no genetic relationship to them.
Another source were the Circassians… and genetic studies show we do have a genetic relationship to them, but the relationship dates back to thousands of years ago due to the ancient Anatolians and is not related to Circassian slaves.
Syrians, same story as Circassians. The Ancient Anatolians were a mixture of three genetically different peoples: Anatolians that had migrated from the Caucasus, Anatolians that had migrated from the Balkan and Anatolians that had migrated from the northern Levant. Our genetic relationship dates back thousands of years ago and has nothing to do with slaves.
Many many Nubians were also enslaved, yet there is not a genetic relationship to them at all.
Barbary slavery? Why do people even think the Ottomans were responsible for that? Ottoman North Africa was relatively independent and ruled by regencies. Matter of fact, until 1830 69% of Ottoman Algeria was not even under practical Ottoman rule as the local tribes refused to obey the regencies, Deys, Beys, Ağas and Janissaries. The local and coastal North Africans absorbed some slaves and the rest died without producing any off-spring. Let me remind you: anticonception already existed back then!
By the way, the Barbary slave trade was actually not only perpetrated by Berbers, but also Dutch and English Christians and converts to Islam. Why? Because they (Protestants) wanted to attack Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and French villages (Catholic).
The only reason Turks are 20-50% descended from Turkmen is that the Christians of Anatolia converted to Islam and married the Turks. Most of these Christians, especially in the first four centuries of Turkish presence in West Asia and Southeast Europe, converted because they totally disliked the Byzantine empire that tried to assimilate all its minorities and was very corrupt. Matter of fact, many Christians remained Christian and joined the Turks because they, in contrary to the Byzantines, allowed them to retain and preserve their identity.
The Ottoman state is known to have started as a confederation of Muslim Warriors (Gâzi) and peasants looking for Holy War, and Christians as well as recent converts to Islam. Even royal Byzantine Greeks converted to Islam and joined the Turks! Examples are Köse Mihal, member of the Palaiologos dynasty. He converted to Islam and contributed to the development of the Ottoman state. John Tzelepes Komnenos was the nephew of the Byzantine emperor, he tried to overthrow him, failed and subsequently converted to Islam. In addition, he married the daughter of Seljuk Sultan Mesud I.
Ever wondered why Ottomans easily took over the Balkans? They faced little resistance. For example, Serbian peasants mostly did not assist their Lords in fighting the Ottomans because they had simply better lives under Ottoman rule. Serbs enforced the feudal system with Lords of noble descent that could not be punished, were allowed to exploit the peasants and impose limitless taxes. In the Ottoman empire this was not the case. There was the timar system, were “lords” had lmited rule, there was a strong centralized character, timar-holders could be punished if they abused their power and could not impose limitless taxes. In addition, Serbian serfs had to work 2 days a week under Serbian feudal rule, but only 3 days a year under Ottoman rule. Another thing : Christians did not have to serve the empire! They did not go to war thus never lost any male relatives to war. This is also the reason Christians were the richest group in the empire; they never lost cash earners.
During the later centuries of Ottoman rule, Christians converted to Islam because they could not afford the higher taxes which were a result of external as well as internal issues, or they wanted to inherit their family’s entire wealth (a convert to Islam would inherit his parents’ entire wealth after they died and not his Christian siblings) and some other reasons. In addition, others were proselytized and thus were convinced that Islam is the “only right” faith.
It is a wholly anti-Turkish and inaccurate assumption that we are descended from slaves that were raped by the Turks. Matter of fact, rape was an offence and punishable by death or mutilation and slaves had many rights. Please don’t think Ottoman slaves were treated the exact same way as those in the Americas, almost all of our empresses and statesmen were even of slave origin. And let’s also not forget that slaves were not only owned by Turks… but also other Muslims and Christians!
Anyway, why would I want to marry a Central Asian to “regain” their appearance?
Let me ask the question differently : Why don’t modern Europeans, Asians and Americans go and marry Ethiopians and other East Africans to regain the appearance of their ancestors that lived 200,000 years ago?
That’s a sufficient answer in itself.
Are German people English?
Are Spanish people French?
Are Georgian peeople Armenian?
No. They are not. Turks are not Mongolian, Mongols are not Turkish etc. Yes, they were neighbors for a long time. They co-existed in Xiongnu, Turks were the "blacksmith vassals" of Xianbei and Rouran, however they are not the same.
Turk,Mongol and Tungus are the three nations of Central Asia. They share similar culture, similar in appearance (maybe except Manchu and Oghuz) but they are not the same.
Ebu'l Gazi Bakhadur Khan, a historian and a khan of Khiva in 17th century says, in his book Sagara-i Turki , that Abulca Khan of steppes had two sons. One was Tatar and one was Mogol. Descendants of Tatar became the Mongols and descendants of Mogol became the Turks.
Even though some igno’rant, or rather un’educated tr’olls often attempt to use the word “Mongol” as an insult material against the Turks around the internet, the Turks are not Mongols, and the Mongols are not Turks.
The Great Hunnic Empire was the first example of the Turco-Mongol political unity. There was a substantial amount of Mongol tribes inside the empire. Later, the Turco-Mongol state tradition and steppe culture continued to influence the European Huns, Göktürk State, and the Uyghur Khanate, as well as the Mongolian Empire after Ghengis Khan ensured the unity of tribes.
Since the Hunnic dominance until the rise of Ghengis, the Turks had been the winning party of the Turco-Mongol struggle. The dense waves of Mongol incursions forced many Turkoman tribes in Central Asia to join Ghengis’ army. In other words, the influence of Turk ethnos, culture and language increased, and expanded to many regions of the Middle East.
The Golden Horde (Kıpchak country and Western Siberia), Chagatai khanates, Transoxiana and East Turkistan completely evolved into Turco-Islamic states. Timurid Empire also preserved the Turco-Mongol tradition. In summary, the Mongol state tradition had originated from the old Turks, and reached to the Ottomans because of the Mongols as well.
Today, there are also many historical and cultural connections between Turkey and Mongolia. Valuable artifacts on the fields of archeology, philology and anthropology that enlightens the history of the Turks, including the Orkhon inscriptions, the most significant source for Turkish history, culture and language, are located in Mongolia. The Turks and Mongolians lived together in a vast geography for centuries.
Tatars (Volga-Bulgars) are a TURKIC people living in the middle of Russia.=)
Are you Russian :)
Long life Chuwash (Suwar-Subartu) people! World class job bro! Wich program?
GONGRATS FROM DUNAVska Bulgaria !! BROTHERS
Мы все братья 👋💪🇧🇬
@elfiarussia :) lol afroamericans mother language were not english .. and tatar people origin belong to old bolgar turkic people .. and language from turkic oghur branch ..
Agzina saglik. Tatarlar'a selamlar.
turkic is not an ethnicity but more of a linguistic group. if you go look at turks in turkey they look more like arabs...nothing like this.
да это так у моей бабушки глаза голубые и волосы светлые-у жены зелёные они все чистокровные
Девушку в школе учили тому, что ее предки пришли из Монголии))) А она смотрела на своих родных и не могла понять, как же такое может быть))) Учите , господа, матчасть, и не тычьтесь в псевдоисторию, сочиненную немцами Петра Первого))
@TatarTuruk You confuse origin and language group: ) It's not the same.
@lukrecian
actually there is no real proof that bulgarian sovereigns were referred to as "khans". there are mentions of "kanasubigi" which means "ruler from god" and "archon" which is in greek texts and is the greek term for monarch. But there was an assumption that they were called khans which is really not borne out by facts. With Boris I they started being called "knyaz" which is the equivalent of king and subsequently with Simeon I "tsar" which is the equivalent of emperor.
I live in Texas........ I wish there were some Tatar women here!
А днес Тракия ли се казваме или България, приятелю? :) В нашия съвременен български народ много народи са оставили гените си и траките с едни от тях. Ние носим името на народа, който тогава е бил по-силен и е знаел как се ръководи държава :)
Bulgar Tatars
@TatarTuruk
I already told you, but to speak with you is the same like to speak with a radio - you may repeat one and the same thing forever. Read something about the Bulgarian history - read in wikipedia, if you can't find another sourses. Read something different from the Turkish history books you strudy in school.
Bulgarians are people with own identity. Where they moved to live, they created a country, and they named it to the name of the nation - Bulgaria. There were 2 Bulgarias
Mashallah wa TabaraqAllah
0:12 The balloons in the colors of the Bulgarian flag,white,green and red:}
Greeting from Bulgaria!
song sound so nice
The name og tribe "kutrigur" is came from the name of Khan Kotrag - son of Khan Kubrat(Kurt).
Khan Asparuh, founder of Danubian Bulgars is also son of Khan Kurt.
Name of tatars(tartars) came from turkic word adn its mean "last child", because this state is a last turkic state.
Name of Selchuk Empire came from name of Selchuk Khan,
Ottoman Empire - from Osman Beg,
Azerbaidzan - from Azer Khan,
Ozbekistan - from Ozu Beg Khan...
Only the names of confederations are different...
They looks normaly (as most of slavs [russian, ukrainians, polish, czeks, slovaks and belarussians] or lithaunian [and latvian]) only languages other
@bipkatr
Shto se otnasq do imeto na Omurtag...
"Omur" na turski znachi "grubnak", a dumata "tag", oznachava "planina".
Ne si izmislqjte termini i chujdici, za da se izkarate ne-turki...
Ako iskate da nauchite neshto poveche za predcite si, nqma da e zle da imate pone elementarni poznaniq po turski ezik, zashtoto tova e edinstveniq nachin da razberete ostavenite pismeni dokumenti ot velikite vi predci...
Naj-malkoto ot uvajenie kum titlata im "Kan", koqto na turski oznachava "kruv, roda".
@TatarTuruk I DO:) And there're no Crimean Tatars in my videos, only VolgaTatars.. You should study more on genetics and anthropology, mate:) No any offence.
Что бы показать татар одного видео не хватит.
Это не однотипное племя штампуемое как на заводе. Татары- это смешение тюркских племен.
Ramil ahad Това са българи .Спрете с маниполацията татари .
Булгары - это тюркское племя. Прочитайте Махмуда Кашгари, он в 11 веке описал тюркский язык булгар и до сих пор нынешние татары урезают окончания слов, как и булгары. Так что не важно как нас называть - мы тюрки.
Булгары не тюрки а славяне! Ислам не их религия, татарский не их родной язык. Булгары - скифы или славяне, ведь тюрки не бывают светлыми!
Булгары тюрки и ислам их религия.
@@russyswasti2044 вы да, а мы нет. Наши предки приняли ислам.
Fuck yeah!
I'm a Crimean Tatar.