How to Destroy Aircraft Carrier
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 лют 2024
- Join us as we explore the history and tactics behind destroying aircraft carriers. From strategic planning to actual battles, this mini-documentary will give you an insight into one of the most important aspects of modern warfare. Discover the methods and weapons used to take down these massive, powerful warships. Don't miss out on this #shorts video! #fyp #military #tactical #war #history
With that green camo pattern, all im seeing is some taiga forest in space.
Lol i'm ASSUMING it's meant for protection from satellites when in transport, not in the sky. China knows America has really good spy cams in the sky.
Or it could be totally a paper tiger thing, PLA loves that stuff
@@agxrytthis is why American missies have American flag camo on them, the USA is not afraid to show the enemy when they fucked up lol! (I’m joking)
the camo pattern looks ridiculous because it is. What is shown is a freaking launch tube flying at orbital height, not the missile. The camo is for the TEL vehicles on the ground.
They just wanted to show off the skin they got after opening so many loot boxes
@@THECHEESELORD69 AMMMMNERRRIKKKA!!!!
You know what's faster than a missile?
Freaking lasers
Also LEO 15K+ MPH drone fleets armed with whatever the target requires.
Hypersonic missile most likely immune to heat. (the heat from air friction itself is higher than a laser)
Or phasers 🗿
@@anchorread68If the air friction got that hot at the altitudes they're used you would be correct but it doesn't.
On sharks!
You can call it a carrier killer when It actually kills a carrier....
Well, China did sink a very large ship thousands of KM away from their shores using two missiles launched 4000 km apart but arrived at the target in the same time. Think about that.
@@lppoqqland was that ship actively trying to shoot the missile down? Countermeasures? No?
I rest my case.
Especially given the patriot system is currently blowing hypersonic missiles out of the sky over in Ukraine lol
@@shadowninja8011excellent comment!
I belive we all seen a picture of single HARPOON impact on stationary Perry class. One! Stationary ship, not defending it self. Hehehe
@@shadowninja8011 LOL do you even know the terminal velocity of these Chinese missile??? 😂 Can you tell me last time a patriot system was able to intercept even a mach 3 missile? I suggest you do a little research before you jump to conclusions. No one in the world can stop these missiles.
@@Energyy1981 Maybe learn what hyper sonic missiles are? Harpoon??? Perry class??? Are you stuck in the 90s?
The US has explicitly stated that conventional payload or not, any use of one on their forces would be treated as a nuclear ICBM attack. Good times ahead.
The idea that two nuclear great powers can have a "limited/conventional war" is basically a fantasy anyway. A lot of professionals have noted that the dynamics of escalation means both militaries have an incentive to be the first to escalate, which means the spiral of escalation quickly lose control.
@day2148 tell that to Macron, he didn't get the memo
Russia said the same, now we are 2 years into the war.
Well that’s just stupid. You bring a weapon to my doorstep and if I strike it, you’ll treat that as a first strike. Grow up.
@@PuzzlingDingo Macron paid lip service. He hasn't actually done much of anything. But if NATO forces actually enters the fight, you can bet it will escalate to atomics within a week.
imagine being a hypersonic deadly missile developed by a superpower to annihilate huge aircraft carriers, only to be called "dong fong"
dong should be a cardinal direction and feng means wind.
ye i can see why they call it that
@@BxBxProductionsit’s more so the comedic aspect of the name that he’s talking about
Dong long
It means eastern wind, 东风
Ah, Dong Fong, great grandfather of Bang Ding Ow and Ho Lee Fuk
China "We have hyper sonic missiles"
America "I know you don't, because I haven't developed them for you to steal yet"
Yeah, last thing China developed was gunpowder. And they didn’t even use it right
HLC ❤
That's the thing though, we've had them for years.
They can steal from russia tho
@@ohhai1486Russian garbage not worth stealing at best selling to Africans who don't know any better 😂
Using an intercontinental missile like that as a conventional weapon is a great way to get nuked without trying to use nukes.
If you only want to destroy a carrier you don't need to waste a nuclear warhead
@@JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor That's not what he just said.
Getting nuked game can be played both sides
@@slavakotelnikov2440 wow, really? No one has ever said that before
@@GeorgeLiquor yes, you will be nuked in return if you try to nuke someone, pretty trivial. So you have to make a decision if you willing to stick your neck for countries that have no relevance to you
This piece should be titled "How To Destroy A Cartoon Aircraft Carrier In A Cartoon".
China “we have hyper sonic missiles”
America “I know I saw you make them”
US: we have more genders than you have missiles
Or rather: " I know I saw it on UA-cam "😂
@@laimejannister5627 lel
@@laimejannister5627 gay people have assimilated into western society and proudly make up about 1/4 of the armed services. This means we will always have soldiers who want to fight, you commies and dictators will be conscripting from a decreasing pool of people who don't want to fight (who are the gays now). Difference is, we have tough gays, you have weak ones.
Everyone forgets that USA developed a Hypersonic HAARP missile that went MAC 20 In 2006
The kinzhal is NOT a hypersonic glide vehicle. It has no low level maneuverability. It's just an air launched ballistic missile that happens to go hypersonic, like all ballistic missiles do.
This should be the top comment. The creator of this video doesn’t seem to have understood the nuanced difference between hypersonic missile and hypersonic GLIDE vehicle. The hypersonic glide vehicle is a new platform. Hypersonic missiles are not.
B's 😂😂😂😂
Not to mention this guy says it can avoid missile defense systems… even though the patriot has been constantly shooting them down.
@@anomalyfox5186 well....wrong. Those are just claims and prob nothing more. And only kinzal was taken down.
@@grazvydassereika3958 I was talking about the Kinzhal. That’s what the comment I’m replying to was about…
USA:
"Don’t touch my boats..."
Japan:
"He means it, too..."
You win the comment section today. 😂
China, "Here, hold my Maotai."
@ftd7435 China: "Hold on, let us read books other have written because we have no combat experience against a modern military whatsoever and like Iran we will probably prove to be a paper tiger."
Well, since it is hypersonic, they can't get midcourse updates until the plasma that starts up around Mach 5 goes away after they slow down again. Now, the whole time they are on the way over that 5K km path they light up the electromagnetic spectrum like an underpowered lightening bolt, meaning a SM3 is on the way to "greet" them. Not to mention the Carrier Task Group has moved 10 to 15 nmi in any direction. Good luck with hitting anything important since physics still applies.
Oh, and don't forget to put fuel in the rockets, not water!
Actualy i did some math and calculated it will travel about 100nm
@@potkangaming When I first read your post I thought you meant nanometers! 😂 So assuming the TF is traveling 30 to 35 nmi/hr you are estimating a 3 hr time for a Mach 5 missile to travel there? Mach 5 is about 3700 nmi/hr so you are saying the missile is traveling slightly over 10K nmi?
@@charlesrichardson8635 actualy i got the time it will take the missile traveling M5 to travel 5000km which was about 109 minutes and then using the top speed of ford class carrier which is 56 knots to calculate the distance it will travel in that 109 minutes it takes the missiled to get there
My bad the time was supposed to be 49mins and with that it should be about 45nmi
@@potkangaming 56 KNOTS WOW! I have never heard that, but then I know the actual top speed is a secret. Last I heard the Ford class was capable of 35+ knots which still pretty fast for a ship that size.
"How do you want us to animate it?"
"Just make it look cool and intimidating."
Like those people who show the entire cartridge flying out and not the bullet itself. This is a missile and it's silo flying around
@michaelhanson8296 LOL yea you can see the silo still attached
DongFun 3000
Bye bye US Carriers 😂
Don't be intimidated US military are meant to be invincle even against nukes
I've developed a prototype that can reach speeds of 52,000 kmph. It's called tacobell.
Lmao
Back to reality though, The US doesn't have a good way to intercept a hypersonic missile, on land or carrier if they did they would be showing it to the world, so no dice 🎲.
both ends
When a Tacobell warhead strikes its target, a biological weapon is created as byproduct.
😂😂😂
You know what’s even faster than these hypersonic nuclear missiles….? Just a simple phone call between leaders owning fault and apology. ☎️
Most underrated comment.
"You appologize first."
"No you."
@@DzinkyDzinkOUR Apologies ⚒️🇷🇺🐻💂🪆
That doesn’t even work with a yelling match with most people.
What the hell is wrong with you? That would make sense and save countless lives. Hasn't the Israel - Gaza conflict taught you anything?
"makes it harder for the US to shoot down"
Ukraine : * Shoot them down with US weapon systems from the 90s *
Not with great ease though. And need them plugged in into state of the art expensive radars.
Lol, maybe with the launcher but certainly not with the missile.
2 cirkons and more than 8 kinjals were successfully intercepted by a dated Patriot. Moscovia arrested almost all engineers related to the development of those missiles as traitors.
weapon of this class is not even deployed anywhere in real situation yet. which propaganda video did you watch
@@pseudoharm The Kinzahl has been used a few times in Ukraine, by admission of the Russian federation.
I feel like the reason the Russian Hypersonic missiles having unpredictable flight patterns is more of a design flaw than a purposely designed feature. 😂
You left like 20 comments, you really like sucking off the american military industrial complex
Good underestimate your enemy
😆
The engine probably vibrate so much it start to snaking the missile flight path
They're incredible at destroying stationary wooden mockups in the desert.
Before everyone poops their pants in fear, just realize that the German V2 was a "hypersonic" missile.
Oh poop
Someone doesn't know the difference between hyper and super. I bet the term kinetic energy is lost on you too.
@@aardvarkbiscuit2677 someone does not know the velocity that V2 achieves during the "space" portion of its trajectory...
Before??! Too late, man. Too late.
@@aardvarkbiscuit2677
Oh SNAP!! 😅
You know what’s faster than that missile?
The hellish response.
I don't like China either n allat
But what response is coming if the damn carrier group is sunk
@@ultimatebigbrainhelth3161About a dozen nuclear warheads from submarines LOL
They already have ways to defeat these missles
In sci Fi movies 😅
Nobody has the capability to defeat hypersonic missiles😂😂😂 The war in Ukraine has shown that US HIMARS can't even stop normal ballistic missiles 😂😂
Yes possible in CNN propaganda 😂
@@cornebodlol what dumbass. First check what himas is for. And it's not air defense. I pity the 3 idiots that liked it
What are you talking about? Himars are not a defensive weapon so that makes absolutely no sense. The patriot system has shot down multiple hypersonic missiles from Russia. That has been proven @@cornebod
China: We have hypersonic missiles that can take out your boats!
Japan: Last time we did that, they unleashed the sun...
Too busy having drag shows and promoting people based on DEI to unleash much anymore.
China: Oops they’re no longer the only country that unleashes suns.
@@reboot2975
Japan was toast long before that point. Just stubbornly refused to accept it.
@@mikelp72😂
I wonder if a day will come that people stop regurgitating this cringe unleash the sun comment
I'm really impressed that, not only was the camera man able to keep up, but he could breathe in space.
granpa Rick created beathable space for him
Filmed from a BMW M5
The theory: Cameraman never dies
The proof: this video
@@BarnDoor-won5ve bruh how high are you right now that you took this much time of your day to leave a very long comment to pretty much just say "the earth is flat" ?
Laugh out loud 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
The patriot system works just fine against them funnily enough.
Two types of superpowers in the world: Those with carriers worth a damn, and those who are desperate to develop "carrier killers".
China: we have missiles to sink American carriers.
Japan: been there done that. It's not worth it. Don't touch their boats.
😂
Tito! Tito!
Your right HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@@ASonofGod-zf1lm and yet your army was defeated in the battle of Yultong by my motherland the Philippines during the Korean War.
@@ASonofGod-zf1lm for such a large population, for such a high tech and high iq of people, they sure depend on stealing all the stuff that makes such possible, and has such big issues, and took this long to reach the power of one of the youngest nations that beat china for couple generations, that china STILL continues to have to steal innovations from, just so that its citizens can think they are more than what they arent. China should be humbled by the level of patients usa has shown to it. We could have easily made the whole mainland a sheet of glass long ago but we were far more reasonable. Chinas so great it even happilly follows people who lead 45,000,000 of its own people die to hunger when it had the means to feed them but still had so little compasion for human life that it doesnt even matter, just like how they are today. China can go ahead and ruin the world. Thats all itll do for it. Just look at the cities just falling apart, electric cars catching fire everywhere, no ability to create something and get the credit you deserve for creating anything. Lol its funny watching ppl be proud of such shameful ways of reaching power
Years ago I was a checker shirt on a carrier. Always had alert birds ready to go. We knew and understood our life expectancies in a full blown war was roughly 15 to 20 minutes.
I was on the Forrestal in the early 80s. I recall a saying that "The mission of a carrier in combat is to get all the aircraft launched. Anything after that is gravy."
Translation: You're expendable, just get the planes in the air. Whether or not you're there for the planes to return is bonus.
@@brolinofvandar I was early 70’s Oriskany , we would laugh and say we will throw our speed handles at the incoming.
perhaps 15 to 20 minutes to sneak into the kitchen and gorge on a final buffet (for sure kitchen staff will have first dibs).
Yawns a Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Oh, excuse me, gentlemen."
"Excuse me, too."
I love the modern warfare shorts. Keep them coming. Im soon joining the military and knowledge of Weapon systems will be very helpful and easy to learn through u guys
Osean Federation: Who needs a hypersonic missile when you can have a mute pilot who can break laws of physics?
The amount of people that don't truly know shit about missiles in here, but talking like they do is astounding.
But they sure do have opinions.
It's why I came to the comments - to watch idiots become more Idiotic, angry with ea other and argue 🤣🤣
Some of them make me question my faith in humanity.
It's always entertaining how many people will be arguing for days in the comments section, and you can quickly see that they're clueless.
Especially the Americans 😅
Assuming that the missile has actual rocket fuel in them.
Very true , Chinese fills it with water rather than fuel😂😂
Why would they have actual rocket fuel? They spent billions manufacturing them and you think they'd put in ACTUAL rocket fuel and real warheads? Lmao!!! 🤡🤡
@@magistic345 lol. This is why Xi only makes announcements of invading Taiwan but knows that it is only a pipe dream
The Chinese missile looks like an unmanned MiG-21
At that speed it doesn’t even need a warhead
Russian Navy had a cruiser nicknamed "Carrier Killer". It never sank a carrier during its service.
I believe it's 3 tiered anti missile defense system failed to even notice it was under attack until it was hit by two sub-sonic Ukrainian made missiles.
@@novat9731 that's was other, smaller class of Russian cruisers.
Russia have bigger ones, Kirov battlecruisers with hundreds of antiship amd anti-air missiles.
But Russia can sink carriers without ships at all, just by anti-carrier missiles launched from the ground
Because it never needed to
that carrier also isn't a hypersonic ballistic missile so yeah
@@novat9731 It does not matter. Russian government is not making money on building weapons, they are building actually working missiles and guns for defense.
Dude, the russians “hypersonic” missiles are getting spanked by the patriot in Ukrainian hands, that’s why the main design guy fell out of a window!
You forgot to add 'go America' or Ukraine or something like that at the end
@@m.abdullahejaz3730 stating a fact doesn't make someone a cheerleader
The America military is so far advanced compared to anyone else. The rest of the world is trying to figure out hypersonic missiles meanwhile we've skipped that and moved on to railguns. Like there's a reason America's not caring about inventing hypersonic missiles, we started inventing those like 70 years ago..
@@NinjaSushi2used V-2 rocket tech acquired from Germany at the end of WWII and haven't had to worry about the Russians utilizing it in the same way. You are correct, swarming/groupthink technology, railguns and focused energy is what's being focused on now
The youtube comment memes of glory are as silly as when the news would put emphasis on some random apartment building that was hit with a rocket and some 4 civillians were killed when at the same time, theres tens of thousands of soldiers losing a bridge crossing thr dnipro river. The average media enjoyer lmao. @m.abdullahejaz3730
People who are downrating this missile have no clue how fast Mach 18 is and have no clue how powerful a 500kt warhead can be. They also are not aware that an aircraft carrier cannot really hide in the ocean with current technologies. If the American could weed out four Soviet subs during the Cuban missile crisis, then a huge aircraft carrier floating in the ocean should be easily detected.
Well you can see the Sun, getting there is a little tricky.
The “shop 1 item” link on screen had me nervous for a minute.
Did they just say a "Kinzhal can negate US air defense systems?" .... this must be an old video
They literally destroyed at least 2 out of 3 US Patriot systems in Ukraine which couldn't defend itsrlf
yeah
No, no... the Vatniks are still gobbling this shit up
Same thought
Didn’t we shoot one down in Ukraine using the patriot?
Terrible video:
1. The missile is still inside its mobile launch tube, so this isn't even the missile.
2. The missile is burning at high altitude when it should be coasting on a ballistic trajectory.
You mean scary... Aircraft carriers have been made obsolete by hypersonic missiles at a fraction of the cost which even Iran have developed, The US doesn't have a functional way to intercept a hypersonic missile, on land or carrier if they did they would be showing it to the world, so no dice 🎲.
The latest missiles fly at Mach 15 or so WHILE STAYING IN THE ATMOSPHERE! The rocket keeps burning to KEEP it going that fast. It stays in the atmosphere so it can maneuver and avoid missiles sent to shoot it down.
@@jeffputman3504Yeah, but the missile in the animation doesn't even have control surfaces that I can see. How will you even direct the missile to the target or evade interception without it? The animation is just bad.😂
Very
I came to say EXACTLY your first point...thats the launch tube lmfao
Wow, now we really invented something that can go faster than the speed of light
A hypersonic warhead is actually very easy to predict in terms of vector. They travel at such high speeds, they can not easily change trajectory once they have re-entered the atmosphere. That is why all modern space vehicles do a final burn while entering the atmosphere, in order to slow down enough to be able to actually maneuver through our thick atmosphere.
Hypersonic missiles? US? Railguns?
This becoming a great setup for a stonehenge defensive
im personally awaiting the arrival of the arsenal bird
The railgun project failed though. It was too expensive to fire and it tore itself apart with every shot. Big reason why the Zumwalt destroyers ended up being a big waste of resources.
@@tomkingston4203 dont worry, i know that, but its still a cool concept tho for the future
Railguns were quite effective during World War 1
Whoever develops lasers/railguns first will be the real top dog
Japan is making serious progress with railguns, and the US has started fielding lasers for ship/base defense
300kW for starters. Power will only go up from here
Whats in space ?....
Railguns Are the shit, that kinnetic energy is on a complety different scale than lasers currently.. plus lasers can be negated with mirrors 😎
Once the Nuke is used - the gloves come off and you are done.
The problem with ballistic missiles is that they cannot change their course mid flight. You just fire them at a selected coordinate like you’re playing Battleship. All the carrier group has to do to avoid these is detect and track them, then adjust their course according to its projected impact point.
The Kinzhal is not a hypersonic missile. Its just a ballistic missile... the same tech we've had since WWII.
I mean, it is hypersonic in the sense that all other ballistic missiles are, but the mythos of hypersonic missiles is just eastern propaganda
@@user-dh9uj2ow3p The fastest WWII rocket, the V2, was only considered supersonic. Plus it didn't have the ability to change course midflight. And our (the US) government has openly stated that they cannot reliably shoot down a hypersonic. Which our government has also admitted has been use in the Ukraine and that zero patriots have had any success against a hypersonic. .
The Kh-47M2 Kinzhal is a Russian hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile. Source: Janes Defense and Intelligence Review
@@RFIDemocracy ballistic missiles are hypersonic
@@user-dh9uj2ow3p No... Ballistic relates to trajectory being in a ballistic path, I can throw a tennis ball in a ballistic path and it can be a ballistic tennis ball. A ballistic missile is one that travels ballistic path (a predictable curve). Hypersonic relates to SPEED. So hypersonic missile is different to hypersonic ballistic missile in that its trajectory is not ballistic which is easily predicted and intercepted. Geez youtube IQs
Imagine if Russia and China were renowned and trusted for their honesty and transparency
To be fair; so was Boeing at one point.
Yeah because The US/UK conjoined twin monster is “renowned” for its transparency.😅
@@TheDancingWuliMasters there are degrees of transparency. wouldn’t you agree the western countries tend to be more transparent with its citizens?
russia: THE T14 armata is 10x better and easier to produce than any western counterpart. Source: Trust me bro
@@spaceboitv5646 right! 😂😂
Congrats to them, they've learned how to start a nuclear war.
They made it pointy because they know it would put up a smile on the face of enemy ☠️☠️
China: "We have hypersonic missiles!"
US Private Military Firm: “No you don’t, we haven’t sold them to you yet"…
Sums up American sense of technological suprematism and looking down on others as inferiors
Back to reality though, The US doesn't have a good way to intercept a hypersonic missile, on land or carrier if they did they would be showing it to the world, so no dice 🎲.
@@mrobocop1666 chinese are technoligically inferior , otherwise they wouldn't need to wait for american tech and then steal it (I am not american btw)
China: we don't buy them we copy-no-jitsu them😂😂
@@mrobocop1666you are inferior. Look at Russia, where China gets most of its technology from, Russia is getting stopped by a 3rd world country and it shares a border with Russia. China isn’t much better, their rockets are fueled with water 😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡
Remember in 1940 when the USA said they had space weapons... Ur welcome
Russia's hypersonic missile was already shot down in the Ukraine, by American defense systems. At hypersonic speeds you literally cannot have an "unpredictable flight path". If it tries to turn at that speed it has an unscheduled rapid disassembly.
Not true. They claimed they did and later admitted the initial reporting was false.
@@disillusioned070 So it was "false reporting" four times? Because that's how many Kinsels have been shot down, and that comes from people who program and operate those things, not Ukrainian TV.
@@thebluestig2654 Yes it was false reporting and they have claimed up to 12 now. And all have been proven false. And that's coming from the ukraine ministry of defense
@@disillusioned070 You need to stop getting your news from Vladdy P's Kah Geh Beh Broadcasting Agency.
@@thebluestig2654 Then you should stop watching CNN - Communist News Network
Good luck, still have to track them and anticipate where they will be 18 to 30 minutes after launch, detonating 10 miles away won’t do the trick
Imagine a war like that. Missiles several times faster than speed of sound hitting your base
Just to clarify - hypersonic occurs only outside the atmosphere. They are supersonic upon re-entry. So they can be shot down with current fleet defenses. The issue is less time to react given the quick travel time. Realistically the speed is less of an issue than saturation - too many targets - something is getting through. Drones are way cheaper and easier to achieve saturation with (although I doubt they can get 5,000KM range out of their drones).
This is AI generated. Who was filming it? A hypersonic cameraman.
Seriously??
Anyone who didn't realize this is an animation is a moron.
Don't make me send this to HLC 😂
"Dong Feng"? Gettin pretty close to the conception of "Dafeng". "621, got another job for you."
Yeah, but the response you would get if you did that to one of our carriers would be really really bad for you
ICBM: Hello, i like aircraft-carries☺️
AEGIS system : Nuh uh😐
Aegis systems starting in 1973 a 50+ year old weapons intercept system could not cope with missiles coming in at Mach 10 or 7,767 MPH... would you take a chance to be on that boat being targeted, if you were in the Navy if your life depended on a 50 year old defense system???😮
@@TheDancingWuliMasters1973 AEGIS probably couldn't withstand a mach 10 attack, but you realise that the systems, ships, missiles, and sensors that comprised of the 1973 AEGIS are completely different to those that comprise today's AEGIS?,
@De_cool_dude he doesn't...
@@De_cool_dude I precommissioned an Arleigh Burke destroyer back in the mid 90's. The Aegis system was good but not impenetrable. We were actually part of a missile test and were required to man our GQ stations during the trial. There was even an estimated time to impact for the missile. The missile was scrubbed close to 5 seconds out because our radars couldn't lock on it and never engaged. Granted, the systems may have improved since the mid 90's but so has the missile technology. From what I have read the US military admits that it cannot currently shoot down a hypersonic missile. At least, not with any reliability.
@@disillusioned070 nice. You were operating AEGIS Baseline 4, then?
How fast was the missile going? 5 seconds can be half the RADAR horizon for a super or hypersonic AShM.
I think what the US DoD says and what their capabilities are are extremely seperate things, as SM-3 fired by a Ticon cruiser has intercepted a satelite (going a lot faster than hypersonic threshold) and Patriot PAC-3 has been intercepting Kinzhal a fair bit over Ukraine.
Imagine spending so much time making a video only to realize your information is wrong.
LOL, True and then using an English AI voice over to make the BS more believable (dude should have done in his broken english chinese incompetent voice)
Wrong just because you wish it to be? Aircraft carriers have been made obsolete by hypersonic missiles at a fraction of the cost which even Iran have developed, The US doesn't have a functional way to intercept a hypersonic missile, on land or carrier if they did they would be showing it to the world, so no dice 🎲.
@@user-mc2oc6jw9q
Racist comment, with hatred, I guess that gives you comfort in this Empire's declining years.
@@TheDancingWuliMasters ahh yes, the racist card, when someone can't handle the brutal truth, they play the victim or slur with proper propaganda to highjack the narrative and push an agenda/ideology.
It was a nice touch to give the empire a capital "E" it shows you have some respect
@@TheDancingWuliMasters *Hey dancing Wumao:* ahh yes, the racist card, when someone can't handle the brutal truth, they play the victim or slur with proper propaganda to highjack the narrative and push an agenda/ideology.
It was a nice touch to give the empire a capital "E" it shows you have some respect
The problem they have is once launched at a target their course cannot be changed, since hot air plasma around the missile stops radio signals being received.
So if the target has moved slightly since launch it will miss, so only good against static targets not moving ships.
Russia tried to remedy this by making them slow down when they are near their target for course alteration but then it’s slow enough to be shot down as what has happened in Ukraine.
This major flaw is why the West has not got any Hypersonic missiles in service yet (except Trident). But US, UK and France are all working on their own without these flaws.
❤❤❤❤❤ээ
Hypersonic has been in the bag for decades .....supersonic Is a different story....but then again don't need them when lazers are the go to....
This guy: "capable of hitting Guam"
Me sitting in Guam: 😅
"The Kinzhal missile with maneuvering that allows it to negate the US missile system"
(Laughs in Patriot shooting down 12 already)
12!!! Thats a pipe dream, there's only debated evidence for 1 so far.
Yeah, that.👍
12 out of 200 😂
only need one to pass through to kill an entire city people think theyre invincible if any superpower decide to use there missiles today literally only need one of these out of thousands to kill millions i dont think there is a defense system that could shoot all 100% heck even israel cannot shoot down all rockets made from steel pipes made by hamas and the speed of these hypersonic missiles are lightyears ahead of that so yeah people think theyre safe but theyre not in reality no one is safe in modern war everything will be gone in an instant thats why they build bunkers so that important people could make decision while everything is torched why do they build bunkers if theyre confident in there defense systems?
@@Bk6346Was the other 188 of them within the range of a patriot system? Or before they got there? Were the kenzyls able to hit their target dead on as well? How accurate were the missiles from what they were targeted to, to what they actually hit or were they just lobbed and hoped to hit something good? The fact even 12 got taken out by a system not designed to specifically take out hypersonic missiles after their makers declared them to be unable to be defended against is pretty darn good and makes a joke out of the thing. You should be ashamed of a failure of your weapon with such intercepts at said speeds by a system not designed for it. But hey keep patting ol rusky on back. Winters almost over oh snap.
Our aircraft carriers never travel alone and they have many tricks up their sleeves to stop any assault!
Yes, clever you!
Try to intercept something traveling at mach 20.😂😂😂
@@koomammal2972flying mach 20 in a predictable route is still fairly interceptable by anyone with a capable AD system
"hyper sonic" missiles, YEAH RIGHT
China:"we have hypersonic
USA:" thanks for letting us know you copied our homework from the 50 and 60"
Maybe everyone should discuss on how to avoid war
I wish they would actually use these weapons in a war so we can see if they really work.
The Houthis keep the US Navy at bay with regular missiles. Hypersonic missiles are a boondoggle --- just like aircraft carriers.
Watched podcast of guy who is in military aerospace. He said we do have air deffence to destroy these missles. He said they are supoersonic when they are in space but not when then are coming down. And all we have to know is where its going to land amd we can intercept them. We dont have to chace the missle.
Why do I get the feelin' that one day: a nuclear ballistic missile will be used within my lifetime?
Gone from anti aircraft guns in ww2 to straight up rail guns
They're extremely effective against carrier shaped outlines in the middle of the Mongolian desert.
there's problem with hypersonics because it is so fast it created plasma cloud affecting the targeting capability of the missile. The missile will rely on the location of the Ship but ship is moving target not stationary
They need to build that defense soon ngl
Half the budget went to yachts tho
SM-3 has entered the chat
SM-6 has entered the chat
Aegis combat system: hello 😁
"does anybody know any launch codes"-chinese guys on American Dad
If we know about developing countermeasures, I promise there are currently countermeasures.
USN nuclear submarines be like: "sure! go ahead and try launching those!" 😂
So basically we about to get Stonehedge IRL
You should check out their hypersonic papers. None of the hypersonic can maneuver after terminal speed is met meaning they are just another ballistic missile.
We have flying Doritos that can travel from pole to pole in an hour
These aren't hypersonic missiles, all ballistic missiles are capable of being hypersonic
If you still think countries are building multi-billion dollar carrier platforms without a way to defend against hypersonics, you're most likely mistaken. Not to mention testing these weapons on a stationary target is one thing, but across a vast ocean on a quickly moving and maneuvering target for its size?
there's problem with hypersonics because it is so fast it created plasma cloud affecting the targeting capability of the missile. Ship is moving target not stationary
I’m so glad we built these countries for them to become our greatest adversaries
Once fired... next the whole earth will vanished 😂
Two options.......one is in the ice and can't be taken out and the other is the coolest stringed instrument at the wedding...
Speed doesn't matter if the missile is going right at the air defense system.
That missile hit a static target, not a MOVING carrier.
This video should be titled "How to get nuked."
Just to give out numbers : an object with the weight of a metric ton and a speed of the escape velocity ( Mach 32 ) hitting any place on earth will verify the energy equation of Energy=1/2Mass*Velocity²... If you replace the symbols, you get 6*10¹³ or 60 Tera joules. That's a nuke without the nuclear warhead !
Say hello to my little laser friend.
Correct title should be "How To Hit A Carrier With A Missile"
ALL MISSLES ARE " HYPERSONIC"
CODE-NAME - "Tiny Dong"
Unless you find a way to either steer a hypersonic ballistic missile in the terminal flight phase via radar (hint: not possible) or send live terminal target data (hint: not possible) these are only useful against stationary targets.
If it's road mobile it's vulnerable to conventional weapons
lol, the issue is that they can't turn.