The settlement was strictly based on the NCAA and its payouts to all the institutions within the NCAA. It had nothing to do with the media deals, licensing deals or other revenue streams that the institutions have had outside of the NCAA. Those will be part of the future collective bargaining agreements to pay players going forward, but the settlement just agreed to was only the NCAA and the money it paid to all these conferences. Primarily basketball payments made since the 2016 calendar year. That’s why all the conferences and schools are involved, not just D-1 or FBS schools.
Exactly. People don't understand that the NCAA owns the copyright to March Madness and it's their tourney. The NCAA doesn't own the bowl games, BCS, playoffs, etc. for football. They do little more than serve as a regulatory body.
It's too late to keep up. The SEC and the B1G have almost all of the biggest football brands already. Once they add Clemson and Florida State, it's all over.
Those two teams are probably going to the Big 12. FSU and Clemson aren't going to win anything any more. Neither SEC and Big 10 wants to add anymore dead weight.
@@heartbreak25 Well, if she’s basing her post on recent history, we’ve yet to see an expansion team win it all in the playoff era. TCU was closest but not really close. Until an expansion team can in fact win it all, she’s factually correct but deadweight might be hitting a little too below the belt. FSU should or could be fine regardless of where they go but Clemson will have major issues if they go up to the B1G imo.
@@jansonroberts2616 I'm a PSU fan but I'm also realistic enough to know the B1G has been a 3 team conference the last 10 years. There are 133 college football programs and the only perennial playoff teams were Bama, UGA, Clemson, OSU, UM, and OU. The PAC-12 were virtually shut out. Based on the playoff standard then everyone is dead weight. Going into a 12-team playoffs which will likely get expanded to 16, then yes, FSU and Clemson will have as much as a shot as everyone else. The "dead weight" schools would be the Wisconsins, Iowas, and Michigan States who are just a tier below most years. FSU and Clemson are not below those schools simply based on their fertile recruiting grounds and donor support to buy an elite coach.
The settlement was strictly based on the NCAA and its payouts to all the institutions within the NCAA. It had nothing to do with the media deals, licensing deals or other revenue streams that the institutions have had outside of the NCAA. Those will be part of the future collective bargaining agreements to pay players going forward, but the settlement just agreed to was only the NCAA and the money it paid to all these conferences. Primarily basketball payments made since the 2016 calendar year. That’s why all the conferences and schools are involved, not just D-1 or FBS schools.
That part. Since the NCAA hosts the March Madness basketabll tournament, that's where the percentage is coming from.
Exactly. People don't understand that the NCAA owns the copyright to March Madness and it's their tourney. The NCAA doesn't own the bowl games, BCS, playoffs, etc. for football. They do little more than serve as a regulatory body.
It's too late to keep up. The SEC and the B1G have almost all of the biggest football brands already. Once they add Clemson and Florida State, it's all over.
Those two teams are probably going to the Big 12. FSU and Clemson aren't going to win anything any more. Neither SEC and Big 10 wants to add anymore dead weight.
@@CarlaJenkinsTVsaying Clemson & FSU is dead weight is unbelievable
@@goblue636 Forgive her, she's an OSU fan.
@@heartbreak25 Well, if she’s basing her post on recent history, we’ve yet to see an expansion team win it all in the playoff era. TCU was closest but not really close. Until an expansion team can in fact win it all, she’s factually correct but deadweight might be hitting a little too below the belt. FSU should or could be fine regardless of where they go but Clemson will have major issues if they go up to the B1G imo.
@@jansonroberts2616 I'm a PSU fan but I'm also realistic enough to know the B1G has been a 3 team conference the last 10 years. There are 133 college football programs and the only perennial playoff teams were Bama, UGA, Clemson, OSU, UM, and OU. The PAC-12 were virtually shut out. Based on the playoff standard then everyone is dead weight.
Going into a 12-team playoffs which will likely get expanded to 16, then yes, FSU and Clemson will have as much as a shot as everyone else. The "dead weight" schools would be the Wisconsins, Iowas, and Michigan States who are just a tier below most years. FSU and Clemson are not below those schools simply based on their fertile recruiting grounds and donor support to buy an elite coach.