The Difference between Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @rajivliyanage5856
    @rajivliyanage5856 3 роки тому +12

    In Therawada We have 21,000 suttra. 42,000 Abhi Dhamma 21,000 Winaya. Toral 84,000 Dhamma Sections. The Basic Enlightenment of Therawada is Sothapanna then secondly Sakurdagami thirdly Anagami Finaly Arahath so there are four stages of Enlightenment. As a therewada buddhist I like your teachings and try to get something from Mahayana also thanks

  • @maheshdasanayake2641
    @maheshdasanayake2641 3 роки тому +13

    Theravada Buddhism is very correct really correct .👍✌️

  • @sompasongs
    @sompasongs 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you for your teaching and sharing of Amitabha Buddha.

  • @MichaelFijal
    @MichaelFijal 4 роки тому +8

    Thank you for this excellent explanation! Namo Amitabha Buddha

  • @roktoprobal9505
    @roktoprobal9505 Рік тому

    Namo Buddhaya 🙏

  • @IwanSetiawan-ol5jg
    @IwanSetiawan-ol5jg 2 роки тому +1

    🙏 Namo Amitabha Buddha 🙏 Namo Sakyamuni Buddha 🙏 Namo Bhaisajya guru Buddha
    I take refuge in Buddha, Dharma and Sangha
    May all being be happy sadhu sadhu sadhu

  • @lukemckean6155
    @lukemckean6155 4 роки тому +5

    Thanks again for this video. A good summary I think. Namo Amitoufo 🙏🙏🙏

  • @guaylayhua5653
    @guaylayhua5653 2 роки тому +1

    Buddha’s teaching is , prefect & complete ..to understand & experience in this life -show the way how to live happily & peacefully without fear without any prayer of external forces, (respect visible /non visible being )Which any Religious Label, is not important, we clearly understand that we here to Love + Compassion towards the whole universe of all beings &to observes the Precepts, we are owner of Karma ( where we go after this life is depends on how we conduct in this life , here & now)🙏😃

  • @kimtrinh6741
    @kimtrinh6741 4 роки тому +3

    Namo Amitabha Buddha
    Namo Amituofo
    Amidaphat Amitabha Buddha
    Amidaphat

  • @davidjohnzenocollins
    @davidjohnzenocollins 4 роки тому +5

    Oh, it's OK that there are so many Buddhist schools. Every religion divides up into countless numbers of sects and schools. In Christianity there is Catholicism, Orthodoxy, and Protestantism.

  • @cutebaby8185
    @cutebaby8185 4 роки тому +3

    Namo Amitabha Buddha

  • @Erumim
    @Erumim 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you. It was very well done and helpful.

  • @nexasdf
    @nexasdf 4 роки тому +3

    nam mo a di da phat! Thank you very much!

  • @kimtrinh6741
    @kimtrinh6741 4 роки тому +3

    Namo Amitabha Buddha
    Namo Amituofo.
    Amidaphat

  • @MadushanRathnayakeSriLanka
    @MadushanRathnayakeSriLanka 4 роки тому +8

    Thank you for the very well explanation.i would love to know more about mahayana teachings.im a Buddhist living in srilanka so as you have mentioned we have never heard about Amitabha buddha.as gautama buddha teachings there were 28 buddhas in this SAKWALA.the last one will be maithree which will become buddha in future.but as you said gautama buddha also mentioned other buddhas in universe too.so Amitabha buddha is from another planet?expecting you kind answer.would love to learn more.thanks.

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  4 роки тому +3

      Hello you can start by watching all my videos on Pure Land Buddhism 101 this is a good video about Amitabha Buddha ua-cam.com/video/8HMOVa54hFQ/v-deo.html
      🙏Namo Amitabha Buddha 🙏

  • @kimtrinh6741
    @kimtrinh6741 4 роки тому +1

    Namo Amitabha Buddha
    Namo Amituofo 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @kiratrai
    @kiratrai 3 роки тому +1

    Mahayana and Theravada cannot be compare because. Mahayana is yana but Theravada is just 1 volume out of 18 to 21 volume of sarbayana.

  • @RLekhy
    @RLekhy Рік тому

    In Mahayana Buddhism, how many Buddhas can be born in one age/epoch/aeon? I mean, this is the age of Historical Buddha Siddhartha Gotama! In Mahayana, are there more Buddhas besides Siddhartha?

  • @yohanmadushanka4642
    @yohanmadushanka4642 2 роки тому +1

    sri lankan practice theravada buddhism namo buddaya

  • @chaturatenuware
    @chaturatenuware 2 роки тому +1

    Is ENLIGHTENMENT & NIRWANA same?

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  2 роки тому +1

      There are 52 stages of enlightenment in Mahayana Buddhism, so different concept from enlightenment in Theravada Buddhism
      See my video
      ua-cam.com/video/o8A7Vc0Mv9s/v-deo.html

    • @jagathpriyantha7531
      @jagathpriyantha7531 2 роки тому +1

      @@PureLandBuddhism Thank you 🙏

  • @TheSlader321
    @TheSlader321 Рік тому

    Jiawen can I please ask you a question. So basically I’m Thai and Thai people usually practice Theravada BUDDHISM and I usually have to practice it with my family. Can I be both Theravada and a pure land Buddhist?

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  Рік тому

      Hello yes you can, no conflicts :) Amituofo 🙏

    • @TheSlader321
      @TheSlader321 Рік тому

      Thank you so much! Amituofo

    • @RLekhy
      @RLekhy Рік тому

      @@PureLandBuddhism Hahahaha! Why do you give more importance to the imaginary Buddha rather than to the Historical Gotama Buddha?

  • @richardbudianta
    @richardbudianta 4 роки тому +2

    Namo Amitabha Buddha. What is the name Sutra/Book behind you?
    I also very thankful to you. because you explore many information and real stories about Pure Land Buddhism. Amituofo

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  4 роки тому +3

      So there's a full volume of the Avatamsaka Sutra in Chinese and also a big book on top (the purple one) which has all the five main Pure Land Sutras in Chinese 🙂🙏Amituofo

  • @chyetan8175
    @chyetan8175 4 роки тому +2

    Sister, very well explained. However, the definition of an Arahat is one who has finished his/her training. Would you not the Buddha in this category? Svaha.

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  4 роки тому +3

      Hello in Mahayana Buddhism we say even this Arhat stage is not to be attached but should keep going on the Bodhisattva path and help others to be liberated and reach final Buddhahood (so different definition of what Buddha means between these different lineages). I will do a video about this to explain the different degrees of enlightenment in Mahayana Buddhism 🙂🙏Amituofo

  • @jagathpriyantha7531
    @jagathpriyantha7531 2 роки тому +1

    Buddhist philosophers in Sri Lanka
    Over time, it is difficult to find out how many philosophers have appeared on this earth among the dust of history. Due to the lack of systematic, academic Buddhist education in Sri Lanka, the average Buddhist daughter and son only knows the 'recipe of lies' taught by the Dharma school and the 'outdated' Buddhism given by the school. Because of this, a very ugly and impolite attitude that has stuck in the minds of many people is that there are no Buddhist philosophers in our country, only those who have been imported from India or Europe. So this post is about our Buddhist philosophers.
    1. Upali Maharahta
    It is not known how many philosophers there were in the past, but the first one we find in written evidence is Upali Thero who worked in Anuradhapura in the first half of the 1st century. His ideologies have not yet been properly collected and reconciled. But how much they affected the Sangha society in Sri Lanka can be seen from the 5th century Buddhaghosa monk brought to Sri Lanka. One of the main responsibilities assigned to Buddhaghosa monk was to destroy the opinions of Arhant Upali. In other words, the monk authority of the Mahavihara has acted to use a monk imported from India to demolish the opinions presented by one of our own in our country.
    Reverend Upali was the historical figure who ruled on the 'Kulasanghatta' disciplinary charge which led to the separation of the Mahavihara and the Abhayagiri. The 500 people who came out of the Mahavihara that day did so because they respected Reverend Upali's views. There is not much information about Reverend Upali. He went to Mihinthalam, which was a great forest area at that time, and stayed there.
    2. Monk Aryadeva
    He is the great philosopher of nihilism who brought entire India to its knees. The Mahavihara monks of our country were kind enough not to record a single word about him because he abandoned Theravada in Sri Lanka. If the Tibetan books had not indicated that he was from Ceylon and belonged to the Sinhalese royal family, we would have lost the right to his pride. Through nihilism, he introduced the Buddhist ritual tradition to the world. Even today, the whole world reads his works with great love. Chathushataka Shastra is the most important work among his works. He was in the late 1st century AD.
    3. Reverend Ananda
    Monk Ananda was the poet who lived in Abhayagiri at the same time as Monk Aryadeva. Instead of describing the three things of Sheela, Samadhi and Pragna in a traditional way, he explored the knowledge of the Sinhalese that existed in Sri Lanka at that time and explained it in a brand new way. That work was called 'Vimutthimagga'. Vimutthimagga had a great impact on Sri Lanka. Because of this, the Mahavihara monks brought Buddhaghosa Theru and assigned them as the first duty to write a book against Vimutthimaggaya according to the Theravada tradition, dealing with the three points of Sheela, Samadhi and Prajna. It was 'Visuddhimaggaya'. Then he accepted the Visuddhimagga written by Indian monks and proceeded to destroy the Vimutthimagga written by our monks. Fortunately for us, Reverend Pahian took it to China and wrote it down in Chinese, and now it has been translated from Chinese to English. To know the true Sinhala knowledge of the past, it must be read.
    4. Rev. Anuruddha
    Not much should be said about Anuruddha monk who lived in the 11th century. Everyone who has read the Abhidharmartha Sangha knows him well. As he followed the Theravada tradition, he was not lost in the pages of history.
    Then a long silence. No information about philosophers. Because the Mahavihara stood powerfully.

    • @jagathpriyantha7531
      @jagathpriyantha7531 2 роки тому +1

      5. The monk of Vettave
      Monk Vettewe, whose name is not well known, was the first post-modernist to appear in Sri Lanka. He who lived in the Kotte era broke the existing literary norms and showed them. Changed the definitions. The result was that the village had to leave the country. In the Kotte era, Reverend Rahula has a special place in the framework of traditional criticism. The real revolutionary is Vetteve Thero.
      Now we find the modern phase. A large number of characters are found in the modern period and I will write down a few people who made a revolution.
      6. Monk Buddhadatta of Polvatte
      He is the only scholar in recent times who has read the commentaries of the Theravada (commentaries written by ancient Yatis) up to Tika (commentaries written for easy reading of the aforementioned commentaries) Tippani (commentaries written by explaining the deep points of the commentaries arranged for easy reading). He was also the first scholar to point out various shortcomings of Theravada and criticize them. Most of the information I presented earlier was found in his works.
      7. Monk Sri Prajnarama of Yakkadu
      He single-handedly attacked the literary ideologies in Peradeniya and Colombo at that time and was the wise man who clearly pointed out the shortcomings of the tradition as well as the correct parts. He showed the world the erudition of the Sinhalese of the past by revealing a number of previously unknown information about the Hela language. He was the pilot of modern monk politics who pointed out that monks should come forward in the face of social problems.
      8. Monk Gnanasiha of Heinpitagedara
      Monk Gnanasiha was the first to say that the Paticchasamuppada commentary of the Theravadas was wrong. He pointed out that the Theravadas' interpretation of Chitta, Mana and Vijnana is wrong.
      9. Reverend Rahula Walpola
      He is the one who has presented the most controversial views recently. Some of the opinions presented by him are as follows. Do not dry food in front of the Buddha statue. Feed those who have no food. Taking PARISHKARA (gifts for collecting merits) as sermons is like taking a price for sermons. Instead of leading people to religious pilgrimages, people should be led to intellectual conversations as much as possible.
      The fact that the Sanskrit 'Abhidhammasamuchchaya' was translated into French and given a description in French is a fact that is respected by everyone in the world even today. Philosophically, one of the main points of he's ideas is that Paticchasamuppadaya is a causal constant and it covers man's spontaneity, i.e. his ability to do whatever he wants.
      10. Kulatissa Nanda Jayathilaka
      A direct disciple of Wittgenstein, Mr. Jayatilaka was a philosopher who brought Sri Lankan Buddhism to the world. He explained that Theravada is one, early Buddhism is another. Dissecting the opinion of Reverend Rahula, he pointed out that man's freedom of action is not blocked due to paticchasamuppada. In short, he was the one who rightly showed that Buddhism can be studied without commentaries. But he did not say that the commentary should be rejected.
      11. David Jinadasa Kalupahana
      He was the one who convinced the world that Theravada should be studied without separating Buddhism from Mahayana. Having studied the Tripitaka in Pali, Sanskrit and Chinese, he gave new interpretations to all the traditional concepts. Apart from Sri Lanka, Buddhism is practiced in every country in the world today, with Kalupahana as the starting point. It seems that characters such as Jayathilake and Kalupahana are coming out of Sri Lankan school education.
      Although a few of their names should be added to this list, their influence did not significantly contribute to changing the course of Buddhism.

  • @ของฝากนักก็อป

    Anatta is a central doctrine of Buddhism. It marks one of the major differences between Theravada Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism. According to the anatta doctrine of Original Buddhism, at the core of all human beings and living creatures, there is no "eternal, essential and absolute something called a soul, self or atman".Buddhism, from its earliest days, has denied the existence of the "self, soul" in its core philosophical and ontological texts. In its soteriological themes, Buddhism has defined nirvana as that blissful state when a person, amongst other things, realizes that he or she has "no self, no soul".

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  3 роки тому +6

      There's no eternal egoistic self, but if one studies later about the emptiness, the wisdom of Shunyata and in Mahayana sutras Buddha often talks about the eternal self-nature/Buddha nature. It's just As It Is. All language used by the Buddha is a way of convenience one must not attached to mere words. The doctrine of emptiness is also not contradicted to Anatta doctrine and the self is referring to different things in each of these. IT Simply Is. As it is.

  • @pradnyabharne2972
    @pradnyabharne2972 3 роки тому +1

    Mam are you from japan

  • @LotusYeshe
    @LotusYeshe 6 місяців тому

    Amituofo

  • @chaturatenuware
    @chaturatenuware 2 роки тому +1

    Is ENLIGHTENMENT & NIRWANA same?

    • @PureLandBuddhism
      @PureLandBuddhism  2 роки тому +1

      Amituofo, you can refer to this video: ua-cam.com/video/o8A7Vc0Mv9s/v-deo.html