Scott Slams Raskin On Guns And Crime: ‘Let’s Not Confuse Law-Abiding Gun Owners’ With Criminals
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 тра 2024
- Last week, Rep. Austin Scott (R-GA) questioned Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) on the use of guns in crimes both in DC and nationwide during a House Rules Committee hearing.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Raskin is long overdue for the boot. He’s a joke.
Ratskin is one dummy. He has no working knowledge of firearms but is there trying to make laws. Sad state of affairs.
A lot of them have permits and want the change for the exact reason it is in the constitution, they know what they are and, what they are doing
@@SSB-8🤣 You must have not watched the bump stock congressional hearing.
So when they make laws against child molesting it is only because they have molested children?
He's also demanding nationwide legislation whether the states want it or not. The "Oath of Office" should include a full reading of the entire Constitution for all politicians. Bonus points and committee appointments if they can memorize it and recite it all verbatim.
@@thebluestig2654agree, and something similar but not nearly as technical or centered around legal concepts needs to be adopted for voters. It’s insane to give a full vote to people who don’t really have a basic understanding of much of our form of govt, most other forms of govt, and the give and take of those competing interests, or say, private sector vs govt employees. Non-citizens and people living here illegally having voting rights is just too stupid to even respond to, but I think we’re are starting to see the results of citizen voters who have no interest, loyalty, or alignment with U.S. culture and life views, as their religion commands them not to. Prob needs to be a discussion about freedom of religion, vs the right to vote or hold office , when the religion clearly has designs on contributing to the downfall of that govt and the culture of its citizens. I’ve always been taught suicide was a sin, and that sure looks like the path we’re on…
Rep. Scott, you are way over Raskin's head. I thank you for calling him on his nonsense.
If they raise the age for gun ownership to 24, the voting age should be raised to 24 as well.
And a draft age should be adjusted as well if they reinstate the draft.
Wouldn’t do that since most of their demographic of voters are below the age of 24. As a person gets older, they tend to veer away from Democrat
The 26th Amendment gave to right to vote to any one over 18. Can’t change that any easier than the 2nd Amendment.
How soon we forget. This amendment was ratified in 1971.
18
And they shouldn't make a someone under 24 fight their stupid ass wars. Send people like Raskin.
Get rid of raskin hes a commy smug
Defund the ATF
Vote ratskin out of office
Agree but people love a good circus.
*(((ratskin)))
He's better equipped than anyone in the GOP
I use to like him, but he has because ONE of the biggest liars there is. GET RID OF HIM!
@@Crimso6 He's been a liar before he was elected , why did you vote for him in the first place ?
Raskin is a clown.
Came here to say that. Thx.
Take away the armed security for these clowns.
Good idea, take away “old bone spur” trumps security and stop wasting money.
@williamholst928 that's fine, take away security for everyone. All of the elite say no guns as they have 24/7 armed security. Let them live like the rest of us.
People having no idea about weapons, banning weapons.
Vote the slave party out
Nice to see someone push back on the bully of Congress. Mr Raskin is nothing but. My opinion
Raskin puts on a good show, but that is to hide his level of intelligence, which is sorely lacking.
Haskins IQ is -50
Is raskin conspiring to infringe on our rights?
24 year olds considered youths, how many 19 year olds did you send off to war
I went in the military at the age of 19 they gave me a gun and I believe in protecting myself
"Shall not be infringed"...period
They knew people the likes of Raskin would try to repeal it that's why it's stated in a simplistic way
Well regulated. Dob’t rewrite the bill of rights. K?
Well regulated.....period
@@stephengiunta1564 learn how to write if you're going to criticize...and my statement is part of the Constitution might want to brush up Stephen.
@@stephengiunta1564Primary definition atbthe writing, meaning well equipped and trained
This is what we cannot give a single fraction of an inch on the Second Amendment.
Who is the clown wearing the face diaper? LOL. Wow.
Baby Face?
Bozo!!
The problem is that one side thinks that owning a gun is a crime.
Raskin “ I just threw a bunch of shit together added a bunch of numbers just to make it sound like I know what I am talking about.”
Proud to say I have always voted for Austin Scott.
Anyone who wants any type of clearly an infringement of the 2A should immediately give up their own ARMED security.
Funny…..my father bought me my first pocket knife when I was twelve. He told me that every man should own a pocket knife……guess not
How can you give a young man or woman a weapon and send to kill in another country and not let a law abiding citizen have the protection that criminals have against you!
I joined the Corps when I was 17. When I was 24 I had served 6 years, was honorably discharged, and had two children. Calling a 24 year old a youth is beyond ridiculous.
@@stevestowell-virtue3781 I'm 71 to me you are young I graduated in 71 had a draft card in 70. All I'm saying is that it's not fair to say that you can't have a gun after service to our country and the ones the same age that stay out should as Americans have rights.
@jameschristy5790 Totally agree. I had shotguns and rifles for hunting when I was 8 years old.
Thank you both for your service! ❤️🇺🇸
Just so I’m hearing it right, Raskin wants to go after people who cannot legally own firearms with more laws that say they cannot legally own firearms? That makes no sense
More laws which they WILL NOT SERIOUSLY ENFORCE against ACTUAL criminals.
Jamie raskin : bad hair day
Every day .
No dew rag, makes him look tough NOT.
Looks expensive..too much toupee
“Congress shall make no law”….Why do they NOT understand that?
"Well regulated"....what are you missing?
@@bigperm3853 "Well regulated" in that context means a "having a ready source"... of MILITIA, that is. Due to the NEED for a ready source of militia, "the right of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR arms shall not be infringed", which in that context means "THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".
MILITIAS don't have rights, the PEOPLE do. For proof, if you think "militia" refers to the army, national guard, etc., JOIN one of those organizations and tell your commanding officer that you now have the RIGHT to keep and bear arms while on active duty... let me know how that works out. You LOSE your right to keep and bear arms when on-duty in the military! YOU can be armed only when THEY tell you so!
A READY SOURCE of militia is necessary for the security of a free state, since STANDING ARMIES are the BANE OF LIBERTY. And the MILITIA consist of the PEOPLE who are ARMED.
@@kentuckybowl-o-sticks it does not mean that. It means trained which in today's world means licensed
@@bigperm3853 That's a horrible reach of logic. Licensing makes no sense. It doesn't say that anywhere in the 2nd Amendment. It doesn't jive with the Federalist papers either. The only logical claim might be that the National Guard (state controlled army) is what is referred to by Hamilton as the militia. But in Federalist 29 we have Hamilton talking about "our sons, our brothers, our neighbors, our fellow-citizens" as part of this group of people. And he goes on to add "What shadow of danger can there be from men who are daily mingling with the rest of their countrymen and who participate with them in the same feelings, sentiments, habits and interests?"
@@deepzone31 the term well regulated means trained. How in modern society would you ensure someone had been trained? By requiring licenses. So yes, per the Constitution, in order to own a gun, you need to be licensed. If you are a law abiding citizen, then that should not be a problem
Well done
No judge in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to enforce any form of gun control laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America. The constitution of the united states of America prohibits them from doing so under
The supremacy clause.
Article 4 section 2 paragraph 1.
Second amendment.
9th amendment.
10th amendment.
14th amendment section 1.
Combined.
While I agree with you, it doesn’t matter. These clowns are going to do what they want regardless of legality.
Finally he said what needs to be.
And 2 police attacked today in Washington.
who in their right minds see a 24 year old criminal as a youth? a 24 year old should be well into saving for a home, raising kids or building for that, and working on their careers...Raskin is an embarassment...
Crime goes down when there is no one responding to it 🤣
Fighting crime 101 ala DCP
Has Raskin ever read the constitution or the bill of rights I thought he was a lawyer
So does a 24 year old get sent to juvenile detention?
Scott Slams Raskin On Guns And Crime: ‘Let’s Not Confuse Law-Abiding Gun Owners’ With Criminals
Last week, Rep. Austin Scott (R-GA) questioned Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) on the use of guns in crimes both in DC and nationwide during a House Rules Committee hearing.
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson on British gun laws, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Raskin and DC won't control crime when they know unlawful gun control does not work. Crime control, not gun control. But democrats won't control or stop crime because they need crime for their anti-2A/gun propaganda. When criminals run government crime becomes law.
At 24 I had already led three platoons of infantry...WTH
He hates it when you call him Raskins
Summer is not here yet. Give it time and it will be up by the end of the year.
the voters in Raskins district must be ashamed of the ignorance of their Congressional representation!
No senator or congressman in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to pass any form of gun laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America they are all state officials and therefore prohibited by the constitution of the united states of America from doing so.
Supremacy clause.
Article 4 section 2 paragraph 1.
The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.
Second amendment
THE RIGHT of THE PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
10th amendment
Nor prohibited by it to the states clause.
14th amendment section 1
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause.
All Congressmen are state officials and therefore prohibited from doing so.
Is that a squirrels nest.?.just Raskin
At least he's not culturally appropriating a do rag (for his hair plugs) anymore.
SAY Nojoe TO joe CHAOS TO HIDE CHAOS FROM CHAOS FOR MORE CHAOS NEED MORE MONEY FOR CHAOS AND CHAOS TO HIDE CHAOS FROM CHAOS TO END CHAOS FOR CHAOS NOJOE MADNESS IS CHAOS FOR CHAOS
I want fresh water 💦
Rankin needs his own private Rubber Room !!!
Raskin has no clue what a class three weapon is.
Constitutional Laws and Rights are Supreme Laws of the Land and have Preemption over Federal and State Laws and Majority Vote
State Laws on Gun Control is Constitutionally Illegal as well as NFA & GCA as Zero Constitutional Amendments have been passed to Legalize such Laws
RASKIN IS OUT OF HIS MIND
A 24 year old knows right from wrong. A youth is a person under 18. This could be stretched to the age of a twenty year old given they are just out of teens years. Ay 24, if you have not worked out right from wrong, you are 100% criminal with intent.
This is how I’m going to mark this to see if they take it down because of my comments on the Jamie Raskin comment
The crime has not gone down. The prosecutions have. They are letting criminals go.
If 24 is a youth, why are they not put in the juvenile system when they are arrested?
It really upsets people when they are called crimminals when no such evidence exists ,or are made criminals overnight by executive fiat.
Rankin cancer effected his brain!
Yep. It’s called chemo brain and it’s real
He was like this before his cancer treatment.
Where does it say in the constitution, people have a right to keep and bear arms, as long as those in government are ok with it?
Huge waste of time to have congresspeople testifying to other congresspeople.
Mr.Ratskins.
Ratskin. MAGA 2024!!!
And that ONE crime with a Class III weapon was committed by a police officer with a submachine gun purchased by his police department.
this is what makes me shake my head- Why would you have a problem with what the bill says and then say "I support the bill" Useless politicians again.
Why on earth is a congressman testifying to anything?
I bought a car but I traded it to a kid for a good will favor ❤
Sen chiapet head
24 is a "youth"? I guess America has youths flying multi-million dollar fighter aircraft!
Riiiiight…illegal ownership only…riiiiight
I grew up in SoCal, 80s-90s, during the peak of gang violence. When I was in junior high and high school I knew at least 4-5 kids who had guns illegally. Most common was handguns and shotguns. Most, but not all, we’re gang members. To this day you see news reports of felons committing crimes while in possession of a gun. Criminals have access to guns at will. These laws only prevent law abiding citizens from obtaining a gun. The Dems didn’t care until white kids started shooting up schools in the suburbs. Meanwhile the inner city has always dealt with gun violence. These strict laws are just another excuse to control us. Hitler banned gun ownership before the holocaust.
They all forget most crimes are done by criminals that don't obey the law They get there guns and weapons illegally
I do. I think a 24 year old is still a youth. Obamacare Insurance says anyone under 26 years is still allowed be be on their parent's Healthcare plan(s) - a minor still
TWO. BOTH crimes were committed by POLICE OFICERS.
No Ratskins... you can't pass a legit Fed Law infringing on our 2a Rights.
read the quotes from ismeeal levitts, why is nothing done to him ?
HIS PADDING NUMBERS WITH THIS 24 YO BS.
AND PADDING IT WITH GANGBANGERS.
This man would tell you a cat is a dog. He not the brightest tool in the shed.
And a " Machine Gun " is Belt Fed . At age 24 I was Already Out of the Military , So Raskin say's I was a Youth over seas Protecting America's Freedom .
Slimy Ratskin acting all confused when his logic is thrown back at him.
Raskin keeps looking around for an escape route. He's not used to being asked questions.
Stop going after lawful gun owners !
America vote ratskin out!!!
God I hate this age cherry picking. Select an age. That age is where you have EVERY right as a citizen. None of this driving at 16, voting at 18, drinking at 21, certain guns at 25. It is dumb. At some point you either are or are not a responsible member of society and responsible for your own actions within that society.
We don't need new gun laws! We need people to enforce the current laws that are on the books. Why do we get double talk and run around from politicians on this matter? Criminals do not obey the law that's why are called criminals. Very simple solution to this enforce laws and stop worrying about additional laws!
I’m so glad congress man Scott .Raskin and McGovern r smart elec not acting like gentleman in government
Jamie Raskin is an embarrassment to my state. He should not speak of what he has no knowledge.
A legally owned machine gun was used to kill a group of bikers who had chased an employee of a company in Fairfax, County into the parking lot with the intent of murder , I believe that guy was acquitted of the charge on self-defense reasons.
Raskin is a joke my god time for him to be sent home he needs to be voted out of office
Law abiding citizens should not have any issues with background checks, registering, etc. That's all we are asking for
You can register yours and go through a unconstitutional law but nobody needs to know what I have or buy
@@Jeff-sl8xz glad you like your toys more than school kids
Raskin is choking on his own word salad 🤣😂🤣😂
Raskin is such an embarrassment
Raskin wouldn't even make a good enema bag.
Only ONE legally registered Class 3 weapon was ever used in a crime, and it was committed by a CHP officer against his wife in a crime of passion, with a DEPARTMENTAL gun. ZERO privately owned Class 3 weapons have ever been used in a crime. It's time to overturn the 1934 NFA!
I had heard there were 2 legally owned NFA arms used in the commission of a crime? I’m often wrong though. I’m glad you brought up the fact that 1 was actually used by a LEO. Wonder how many even heard about this?
@@tazmo2004 Very few, thanks to a biased MSM. I first began sharing this about 25 years ago, so it is possible that there mat be another one, but I think I would have heard about it. I think that's why the guy also said one. If you can find another one, I'd be glad to learn, but even two is still an infinitesimally small number. Oh wait! You may be thinking of the self defense shooting where the tech used a prototype and was charged with murder. He was eventually found not guilty.
One of the Marxx brothers shows up at a hearing!
Vote ALL democrats out of office
Raskin swore an oath to actively defend the Constitution that he picks through like a menu and is therefore unqualified to sit in Congress.
They can repeal the 2d A but they can't repeal our rights endowed upon us by Almighty God as stated in the Declaration of Independence. 92 US 542 (1875)
Raskin is a snake. It's funny watching all the times he's been called-out for lying.
When Trump is elected we won't have this crap
Please spell it out to me
Let's compromise abortion and guns legal and move on to regulate the people who violate regulations on either.
Time to move on. If you outlaw guns people will still be in possession of them. If you out law abortion people will still have them.
Wouldn't you love to know what presidents, senators, congress folks, and the Supreme Court members (women, man, other) who have illegal firearms and who of them have had or paid for abortions.
It's time to move on to new business.
Done, abortions arent a right enumerated in the constitution as scotus ruled and remanded back to the states. The right to bear arms by text, history, and tradition under bruen has the specific legal clause "shall not be infringed. It is enumerated in the constitution, under the bruen ruling unless they can show such laws and tradition and text at the time of its ratification, they have no authority to regulate guns.
Who is going to use their $10,000 gun to commit a crime?? Raskin is uninformed and just dum.
Raskin is such a shill.
Raskins is a worm