God's Obvious Creation Is OBVIOUS! | The Atheist Experience: Throwback
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
- Call the show on Sundays 4:30pm-6:00pm CT: 1-512-686-0279 or use your computer to save on long-distance charges: tiny.cc/callthe...
► Don't like commercials? Become a patron for ad-free content & more: / theatheistexperience
► Find all of our links here: linktr.ee/athe...
► Podcast versions of the show may be found at:
www.spreaker.c...
► Atheist Experience merch can be found at: https:tiny.cc/merchaca
► Become a UA-cam member: / @theatheistexperience
► Join our discord:
tiny.cc/acddiscord
Note: We request pronouns as part of the call screening process on our shows, and we display the pronouns our callers provide. If you see a caller with no pronouns indicated, this is because they chose not to provide us with any, and we respect that decision.
-------
WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?
The Atheist Experience is a weekly call-in television show in Austin, Texas geared at a non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.
The Atheist Community of Austin is a 501(c)(3) educational non-profit organization based in Austin, Texas. The Atheist Community of Austin is dedicated to promoting atheism, critical thinking, secular humanism, and the separation of religion and government.
We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.
VISIT THE ACA'S OFFICIAL WEB SITES
www.atheist-com... (The Atheist Community of Austin)
NOTES
TheAtheistExperience is the official channel of The Atheist Experience. "The Atheist Experience" is a trademark of the ACA.
The views and opinions expressed by hosts, guests, or callers are their own and not necessarily representative of the Atheist Community of Austin.
Opening Theme:
Shelley Segal "Saved" www.shelleysega...
Limited use license by Shelley Segal
Copyright © 2011 Shelley Segal
Copyright © 2024 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.
Caller sounds like an 8 year trying to explain what he learned in class a month ago
Don't insult 8 years olds like that.
He sounds like an eight-year-old trying to explain what he heard his crazy nut job uncle say a month ago
Sounds more like an 8 year old trying to explain the dream they had last night or the game they made up and you JUST DON'T GET IT!
An eight year old could be excused because they have not yet developed critical thinking skills. 'Nuff said.
Hahhahahah yes. Cute I wonder if his mom gave him permission to call.
The question is,
Can a theist ever give a simple answer to a direct question?
Depends on what type of theist they are
But creationists are like politicians, it's almost impossible to get a straight answer from them
that depends if the question is out of context !
We haven't seen a whole lot of it yet!
Yes, but only when they’re not lying or pretending to use logic to justify holding a belief without real evidence.
no
Science is the same all over the world. Religion can already be different on the other side of the street.
Unless the scientist is religious.🤷♂️ Which doesn't happen to often.
@@DanielHill-y6p You have a point there. But he will not succeed in giving a religious explanation in his field. Colleagues will immediately attack his statements, when religiously inspired.
If we removed all trace of a a religion. It would be completely gone and not return ever again.
If we removed all traces of science, in 1000 years almost all of it would be back.
@@DanielHill-y6p Then it is not science, duh. Perhaps you put creationism as science and that is your confusion. Science does not care what any person thinks or believes. Therefore, it does not matter if the scientist is religious. If the scientific method is ignored and there is no proper peer review, it just ain't science.
@@robertdrake1756 let me guess you just jumped on the bandwagon. Scientific method is 10th grade and there are some things that we just don't know yet. People are quick to throw on the God of the gaps when you don't know. And some scientist do believe in a God. Some say agnostic, so they don't have to say atheist, like you haven't gotten enough information.
The difference is for Bryan that he doesn't get is, scientists said "we have never seen biological material survive more than a million years," is not scientists saying 'it is impossible for this to happen."
Geez, I googled "Dinosaur blood bone" and immediately found a 2006 Smithsonian Magazine article that covers this whole issue. If Brian had bothered to do the same it would have saved him from making this phone call and making a fool of himself 11 years later.
This stuff isn't rocket surgery.
If theists did research they wouldn't be theists....
There's a reason why we only had the New testament at school, 12 year olds can debunk the first chapter of the Old testament.
Most theist aren't looking for info that debunks their beliefs, they cherry pick to find info that supports the beliefs they already hold. If that doesn't work or is debunked they just move unto another claim. It's all very disingenuous.
When stupid figures out how to use a phone
you get callers like this.
And we don't even know how long that took for him. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I love how the OP is suggesting the hosts of AXP figured out how to use a phone. 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@Hola-ro6yv obviously reading comprehension is beyond you 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The staff in the Rubber room, shouldn't give them access to Phones.
@@Hola-ro6yvyou learned to type, now learn to read
0:34 seconds in Brian said Everything I needed to hear, "I've been on the internet lately & I've been seeing video's""
That's how most people "do your own research."
Lol "it's a bold strategy, Cotton" 😂
Mary Schweitzer has gone on record stating her annoyance with creationists trying to use her discoveries to invalidate evolutionary theory.
1) It was not blood found on a bone, it was found in a bone
2) It was not even blood, but remnants of blood. It would be like arguing that because we find rust, there’s no way that iron existed there for a long time.
I was born with my right leg wrapped around my left leg. The result was lots of doctors visits as they didn't think I would ever be able to walk. Luckily the doctor that was there when I was born did a really good job of straightening my leg out. The result is my right leg is 2.5 inches shorter than my left. My mom took me to a Benny Hinn concert when I was like 8 or 9 to have me "healed". We got up to the steps of the stage and oddly enough they quit taking people up to be healed. That was the day I started seeing through the bullshit...
There is a way to lengthen a leg in medical science. They break the bone and surgically place a piece of mesh around the bone so that the bone will grow more bone to fill in the gap. The mesh acts like a scaffold for the new bone to grow. I would assume there is a lot of pain involved in that procedure and a lot of time where your leg would be in a cast.
@rhondah1587 yeah I had the option to do that in like 6th grade and decided not to. They were going to stick pins in my leg that you turn every day to gradually break the bone till it healed to the correct length. There is probably a better procedure now as this was about 30 years ago.
That scientist DID NOT give that impression. Like any scientist who makes a discovery that seems impossible or outrageously unlikely, they are hesitant to announce it until they can be SURE as possible that they are right! No one wants to be the next cold fusion goober.
and i believe that scientist is pretty upset with the way her research is being used by the likes of this caller. his "she was worried about bringing forth the evidence" is nonsense to my mind. the 'soft tissue' was something they could only find with specialized equipment, it wasn't a lump of soggy meat or anything, it was tiny molecules.
@@NoelSefton
Agreed, but I think scientists are used to this nonsense.
@@NoelSeftonI aggree. And if I remember correctly, the sample needed to be washed and treated in order to extract the "blood sample." It wasn't just literal blood on a bone
The theory of evolution is not at all dependent on the belief that organic material could not be preserved for millions of years. The fact that such material has been preserved for that long opens up tremendous possibilities for expanding scientific knowledge about the evolutionary process because actual 75 million year old dinosaur DNA might be able to be genetically sequenced and studied. That’s amazing.
@foxfireman188-ls1kv Because Christians are always afraid of new and unexpected information and trying to hold on to their dogma, they think scientists are too.
It appears that some callers only call the show to ask the hosts to do their homework for them. To be honest, this can be quite frustrating. It seems as though the caller is saying, 'Here's a conspiracy theory I've heard, but I'm not knowledgeable in this area. Nevertheless, try to convince me otherwise.'
"So I've been on the internet lately..." worse possible way to start a call. Lolz
The Internet is the dumbest thing to come down the pike since revolution in October.
Caller just discovered AOL in 2024
This type of rube is so tiresome. This kid cannot get his head around that this discovery changes nothing about evolution (which is what he's angling toward) but that it merely updates our knowledge of what is capable during fossilization.
Concur.
Anyone who doesn't accept evolution simply doesn't understand evolution. It's probably the single best-evidenced theory in science.
It is ludicrous to imagine that your god did not think of what Charles Darwin discovered. He Was Not the one who introduced the theory (or conjecture) of Evolution. The scribes who wrote the Book of Genesis (and apparently copied some of it from older stories found in cuneiform on baked clay) were educated and not necessarily stupid. But they and all around them were ignorant.
You don't believe in the accuracy of science? No more light bulbs and toast for you.
I often wonder how these people think airplanes and mobile phones and computers and modern medicine and all the other things came about. If God gave them to us, why did he wait so long? Is it an apology for taking so long to come back? Are computers Jesus's second coming?
"But toast helps me see in the dark and light bulbs are delicious!"
Making toast over a light bulb takes so _LONG!_
@@brucebaker810 So disappointed with the EasyToast Oven I had as a kid...
@@kellyrestiaux9846 hey kids. Get in on EasyToast excitement! Just 30 minutes per side and, Hey Presto! A slice of delicious toast! Amazed your friends. Try different breads!
Some people are so gullible.
Not “some”. Most.
Obvious creation is just OBVIOUS creationist's delusion.
Once again. That is not a response. Just a personal insult....and proof of nothing.
@@gmswhackos2652 All religions in a nutshell: a holy text says my god exists so it must be true because the holy text says so!
@@gmswhackos2652 I don't need to prove anything, silly. 😀
"Just a personal insult" Delusion is insult to you? Even the snowflake is harder than you. 🤣PERSONAL...🤣🤣
@@gmswhackos2652 It's not a response, it's a comment. An unsupported assertion doesn't warrant a response.
Well, I have a holy text that says that God does not exist So it must be true because the holy text says so.
The scientific community on dinosaur soft tissue "Might be interesting, but let's see your evidence".
Brian: "OMG THEY BRUTALLY ATTACKED HER!!!".
What he really wants to say is that science made an assertion that turned out to be wrong and his infallible gawd doesn't make mistakes like that.
Then he also has to answer the question that if his God is so infallible then why does the human body have dozens and dozens of flaws? This would indicate that this God creature is not in fact perfect or at the very least is completely incompetent.
If God is the one defining the standards then he is perfect according to it
All the flaws of the human body are the result of sin! Because we all know that sin is much more powerful force in the universe, than tri-omni god!
@@matissimoj1190 I have heard God is all powerful and all intelligent. Either he is not or he wants things to be the way they are right now which begs the question. Why?
@@ronitsrivastava377 probably that god is a massive douchebag/sadist
Neither proving or disproving evolution will prove or disprove the existence of a single omnipotent creator. Even proving that there was a conscious design wouldn’t prove a single designer…and it would provide at least as much evidence of its powerlessness and incompetence as it would provide for its omnipotence and omniscience.
Religion can make the reasonable person seem like a complete fool when talking about their beliefs.
Probably shouldn't use "religion" and "reasonable" in the same sentence.
BBC did a documentary on it. The scientific community were skeptical, however they didn't attack her, and she herself also explains how the parts of the "blood cells" could remain.
The young caller that if I were to guess barely made it through jr. high school, probably thought that the scientist opened ip the bone and blood came pouring out. What a painful call.
There is nothing more intellectually dishonest than refering to the universe as "creation"..
The leading of the question could not have been more obvious if it wore a high-visibility jacket and a construction helmet..
Wrong. Creation and it's "design" by God is a scientific fact. You already know what a "design" is, but you want to act like it's a mystery. We know something is designed, due to it’s intelligent order, repetition, complexity, purpose AND the obvious fact that it didn’t arrive by chance, like a wind pattern in the sand or water waves on the beach. Only intelligence produces designed information, such as the high-complexity/high function DNA blueprint design of 9 million DIFFERENT animals, 300,000 DIFFERENT plants and the human being. I will also add that no design or creation is POSSIBLE via primitive nature (e.g. star dust, moist rocks, mud puddles, hot rocks, moon dirt, warm ponds, gravity, oceans, primordial soup, nothing). Atheism debunked.
If you find evidence of design in an item, you have evidence of a designer. As a designed item needs a designer. God said the same thing in his Word (Romans 1:20).
Low-complexity formations, such as crystals, snowflakes and wind patterns in the sand, cannot be grouped with high-complexity designed creations, such as the human being that has ALL the co-existent designed bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order not only in the human body, but in millions of different species on the earth. The reproducing human being is a trillion times more complex than a watch found on the beach.
The digestive system is a CLEAR DESIGN that's seen in humans and in Millions of animals & sorry pal, but the digestive system didn't come from a moist rock or mud puddle or any other asinine atheist cause/nature/source you want to use. Your atheism and hope of a Godless reality is hereby totally debunked & it was just this easy.
Intelligent design is bullshite NEP.
@@owersmenbwroten9813 Repeat after me: in the beginning man created god in his own image. That's why god is not perfect but has human attributes like anvy, jealoucy, violence, misogyny, regrets, or urges. God is PURE FICTION.
@@owersmenbwroten9813 Repeat after me: abiogenesis and evolution can explain existence of life and speciation as we know it. Evolution is one of the most proven scientific theory in the history, abiogenesis was proven as viable and totally possible origin of life on early Earth. We have REAL POSSIBLE WAY HOW LIFE EMERGED ON EARTH COMPLETELY NATURALLY. NO SILLY FICTIONAL CREATOR NECESSARY.
@@owersmenbwroten9813 Repeat after me: we have NO EVIDENCE about any of more than 3000 gods. Every religion survive only through ABUSING OF CHILDREN with brainwashing and theistic indoctrinaction. EVERY RELIGION IS CULT BASED ON DOGMA.
Notice that none of these faith healers go to any hospital to heal anyone
That may just be a sign of the times - when I went into a nearby hospital and asked if I could pray for the sick (IF they wanted to be prayed for) I was told 'not allowed'. I was honest that I am Christian and didn't just ask if I could visit the sick but made my full intention known.
@@wwlib5390 I understand what you are saying but I would think that's more to do with security and data protection (HIPPA and stuff) than religious beliefs. they can't just have a random person come in off the street and go into patients rooms. Most hospitals provide places of worship for religious patients and they can sometimes request a member of their faith (priest, rabbi etc) if they want one.
The scientific studies done on prayer for healing tend to show either no additional benefits or even can result in worse recovery rates.
If faith healing works then I would recommend you find a faith healer go to a local university and demonstrate that it does. If you can then it would it would be a boon to society.
And. I hope you have a pleasant day
@@wwlib5390
Praying for the sick aka doing F all to help them.
@@wwlib5390 They knew you were a dingbat. Jesus dipshits are a dime a dozen.
And they never heal an amputee 😂
Creation Order : NOT Science
Dirt into Adam: NOT Science.
Rib into Eve: NOT Science
Global Flood: NOT Science
Noah's Ark: NOT Science
This is just the FIRST chapter.
LOL
You can also read Genesis 1 and 2.
Note down every time God creates something and then read the notes.
You'll see how God gets amnesia and creates things in the wrong order and also creates certain things more than once.
For example he creates humans - male and female before even creating Adam.
U. Just made 0 sense
@@thexnatorscriven9700 You failed Science in middle school, didn't you ??
LOLZ
@sanjeevgig8918
Science is NOTHING but what mankind discovers that God has already created.
Creation Order: God's Wisdom
Dirt into Adam: God's Desire
Side into Eve: God's Compassion
Global Flood: God's Judgment
Noah's Ark: God's Provision and Deliverance
And That's just the First Chapter
@@wwlib5390 TYPICAL IGNORANT XTIAN: Typing CLAIMS with ZERO EVIDENCE
LOLZ
3:25 nope, the impression she was giving is that she's a good scientist. It looked like she found something (NOT BLOOD) that as far as scientists were aware wasn't possible, so rather than just blurting out that she made a major discovery like a moron, she did her job and tried her hardest to prove herself and her interpretations wrong. That's not bias, that's being responsible.
And to underline how much this was not her bias.... SHE WAS A CREATIONIST AT THE TIME. It's exactly the kind of thing creationists would jump on, but thanks to figuring out what was actually going on (no, the bone wasn't just a few thousand years old, like creationist bias would scream) she actually stopped being a creationist.
This is one of my personal least favorite YEC taking points. They act like we found a t-rex bone, cracked it open and found fresh meat in there and not we found some remnants of biological material after dissolving the bone in acid!
Creationism: Point out flaws in evolution but give no evidence of my beliefs.
Evolution? I've already debunked new anatomy (evolution). It has never been observed or even proved to be possible. If new anatomy were true, every human, plant & animal would be CLEARLY IN SOME FORM OF TRANSITION and none are. There's not one fossil that's observed to have any form of transition. Evidence for transition simply doesn't exist/can't exist.
If you and your spouse had a baby tomorrow, we know it's anatomy would not only be IDENTICAL to your anatomy, but it would also be the IDENTICAL anatomy of your ancestors, even if we go back 150 generations. Evolution is simply non-existent; it's a total farce.
Creation and it's "design" by God is a scientific fact. You already know what a "design" is, but you want to act like it's a mystery. We know something is designed, due to it’s intelligent order, repetition, complexity, purpose AND the obvious fact that it didn’t arrive by chance, like a wind pattern in the sand or water waves on the beach. Only intelligence produces designed information, such as the high-complexity/high function DNA blueprint design of 9 million DIFFERENT animals, 300,000 DIFFERENT plants and the human being. I will also add that no design or creation is POSSIBLE via primitive nature (e.g. star dust, moist rocks, mud puddles, hot rocks, moon dirt, warm ponds, gravity, oceans, primordial soup, nothing). Atheism debunked.
If you find evidence of design in an item, you have evidence of a designer. As a designed item needs a designer. God said the same thing in his Word (Romans 1:20).
Low-complexity formations, such as crystals, snowflakes and wind patterns in the sand, cannot be grouped with high-complexity designed creations, such as the human being that has ALL the co-existent designed bodily systems (circulatory, respiratory, reproductive, pulmonic, digestive, skeletal, muscular, nervous, body (skin), etc., etc.) intertwined in co-dependent order not only in the human body, but in millions of different species on the earth. The reproducing human being is a trillion times more complex than a watch found on the beach.
The digestive system is a CLEAR DESIGN that's seen in humans and in Millions of animals & sorry pal, but the digestive system didn't come from a moist rock or mud puddle or any other asinine atheist cause/nature/source you want to use. Your atheism and hope of a Godless reality is hereby totally debunked & it was just this easy.
@@owersmenbwroten9813 1. _"Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation..."_ (Lenski, 2008) documents e. coli gaining the ability to grow aerobically on citrate. How do you explain major functionality gains like that without significant changes to anatomy?
2. Is your belief that documented cases of polydactyly never happened? (Well-documented cases of people like Yoandri Hernández Garrido who had six fingers and six toes. The critical point being that _the parents_ didn't have that many fingers/toes, which contradicts your claim that anatomy is "IDENTICAL".)
3. Provide strong evidence of a god. Oh, you can't? Then it's not "scientific fact".
Point out a complete misunderstanding of evolution but give no evidence of my beliefs.
FTFY.
The famous scientist take from her interview:
"Yes, very. After we had the data, I didn’t publish for over a year. I was terrified. First of all, I don’t like attention or the spotlight and I knew this was going to get a lot of attention. I’m not surprised that the response of the community has been skeptical, and I guess I’m grateful for that because the scrutiny has made me much more cautious and therefore, made me a much better scientist. I go above what is usually required to validate my data before I publish-my colleagues are just doing their jobs to be skeptical, a scientist’s job is not to prove things but to question them."
That whole dinosaur bone back and forth reminded me of that bit in Metalocalypse -
Nathan - "But you didn't do any of that though."
Murderface - "But I could have."
Nathan - "But you DIDN'T."
Murderface - "BUT I COULD HAVE!!!"
Nathan - "BUT! YOU! DIDN'T!"
That was hilarious! And at least the comedy of that scene was Murderface being stupid, and it was meant to be mocked. This caller is seemingly genuine, or maybe they're a prank caller, either way, it's not funny.
What a muppet. I'm SO glad his carer helped him dial the right numbers into the magic talky- listeny box and showed him which end you talky into and listeny into. Lol.
In the fifteenth century we all believed the earth was the center of the universe. Thanks to science discovering and excepting new information, we changed our perspective.
Son, "SCIENCE" requires observation. And NOTHING of the asinine, lost & clueless cult of atheism has ever been observed (e.g. big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, evolution).
Try to learn what I'm teaching you before it's too late (when your temporary free will expires at your last gasp on earth and you go to an eternal hell - wishing you had never been born). YOU CAN’T AFFORD TO GET THIS WRONG. Because 100+ trillion yrs from the moment you entire hell, it won’t even be the start of eternity! For now, you and every facet of your asinine, lost & clueless cult of atheism are hereby debunked (e.g. multiverse, big bang, abiogenesis, mistakes (mutations) gaining in complexity/new information, evolution, gain of complexity/gain of new information/new anatomy).
Hey, you 40 and 50 years old out there... Remember when we thought the internet was going to be a way of spreading information, culture... and help educate the world?
... Well, it seems the internet was destined to give people access to videos of people alledgedly growing legs through prayer.
We were wrong all along!
Since God created/designed/produced "legs" in the first place, it's nothing for him to restore them.
@@owersmenbwroten9813 Repeat after me: there is no such thing as god in reality. Clear evidence shows us that every isolated society created their own version of gods, their own verion of LOCAL FLOOD, their own version of Earth and universe. There are no mutually isolated two places in the world where people have the same gods, that clearly proves that EVERY IDEA OF EVERY GOD IS MAN MADE.
@@owersmenbwroten9813which is why, when we look for actual independently verified evidence, we get.... nothing.
@@amtlpaul Pokey claims that it would be nothing for god to restore a leg. And thus he confirms that there's no god since there's no verifiable, documented instance where an amputated leg was "restored".
So NEP, let’s see the evidence that your god has regrown a limb.
Please explain how the burden of proof is on the person making the negative claim, or not making any claims at all.
I just realized how much I've watched this show over the years. I remember nearly every single one of these "throwbacks" instantly 😂
I can't believe someone would actually think a leg could or would just grow... 😂😅
Same people that belueve a man walked on water
"I can't believe someone would actually think a leg could or would just grow"
Personally I would be highly suspicious of such a claim, but given the proper evidence I could potentially change my mind. And I would not consider an Internet video to be proper evidence. I would prefer something like a preponderance of experts on human anatomy agreeing that the claim appeared to be factual and explainable.
But yes, until such evidence is provided, I too would find it very hard to believe that reasonable person would actually think that a leg could or would just grow. 🙂
I was skeptical too but upon further investigation into the evidence, it appears some people actually believe that could happen.
but he saw it on youtube!!
I love when people draw conclusions about an entire field just based on one interview with one person
Wasn't even that. It was one youtube video that either he didn't properly understand the context for OR more likely was clipped and edited by another creationist to fit their narrative for their "checkmate atheist" moment that was shared in their community.
I know what the caller is talking about. His claim is circulating around in the creationist "science" channels about her supporting a young earth.
Its all nonsense that he didnt look into. They even make the claim she was canceled for it. 😂
The Spammer from the Slammer NEPPY, alias Orwensen, can't demonstrate a thing to save his life.
I bet the blood on the dinosaur bone came from that time that Jesus was riding it.
Up to heaven 😂
no it was hitler riding it in the middle of the earth!!
Dear God...Brian sounds like a 4 cylinder brain that's thrown a rod
More like a 1 cylinder engine with a siezed crankshaft.
or a 6 but only 1 is working
Brian just put new plugs in his diesel.
‘I’ve been on the internet lately’……….well dude there’s your first mistake.
Interesting new discovery is made. Scientists: "This is unexpected. Let's study it." Creationists: "Hur hur evilushun faek!"
Wait, why are the creationists in your example Gaelic ?
Question: Who's stupider: a person who believes this garbage, or the person who thinks that making a prank call pretending to believe this garbage is cute?
I mean, once or twice for the lulz or a dare, sure, anyone went through puberty and what not. More than that it's a disease.
the first mid east cult started around 3000 years ago. the second one started 1900 years ago and the 3rd around 700AD, and all keep on going on after all that time. incredible
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -- Mark Twain
Twain didn't say that.
Likely a Voltaire quote, not Twain.
@@bunnybismuthAshley he did look it up
@@ibrahimelmasry-z3kPretty sure you’re trolling. Not interested, thanks.
“Religion is a phase a species goes through when it evolves enough intelligence to ask profound questions but not enough to answer them” Bill Flavell
The poor guy is equating skepticism with ridicule. That is so sad.
So typical of the mindset of a person who has been brought up in a culture where you don’t question anything, you accept what you’re told.
If I were a scientist who made a discovery which like had never been seen before you bet I'd be nervous as hell.. Not to being new knowledge. But nervous that my conclusion and discovery was flawed and wrong.
And I do belive every scientist who makes some kind of groundbreaking discovery would feel that as well.
Well what do you know. In 2015 more collagen has been found in dinosaur bones at the British Museum after Mary Schweitzer first discovered the same phenomenon some years ago. That’s what science does. It discovers stuff that previously were thought to be to be impossible, peer reviewed it and added to the stuff we knew to make the current knowledge of such stuff. Not sure what that has to do with a belief or otherwise of a god, it’s just stuff we find out .
How does god express his love to a bunch of organisms that came about billions of years after a small planet came about orbiting a sun that came about billions of years after the universe came about?
Well, first, he would send some physical avatar, impregnating a teenager wothout consent, during a pretty primitive time in the culture of the organism, in a tiny location on the planet for a tiny fraction of time. And then he would cause that avatar to be killed and say that it was all done to erase the "sins" of those organisms. But don't erase those sins and require them to admit that they are "sinners". And if they don't, threaten eternal punishment.
Yep. Really "loving".
Like all atheists, you're a liar:
"Mary answered “I am the Lord’s servant. May your word to me be fulfilled.” - Luke 1:38
Sin = death and you've sinned plenty. Humanity has +/- 70 yrs to accept or deny Jesus. You've made your decision. Yet you want to come to these threads and whimper n' whine about what you say you don't even believe; thus, you have no business being here. You're just another one of life's losers.
@@owersmenbwroten9813 Your reply sooo misses the point, you might as well not said anything.
God: Hey Gabriel, go tell Mary that she's going to "conceive", if you know what I mean.😏
Gabriel: Mary. God is going to come unto you. Sorry.
Mary: Well, I'm God's "servant". What am I going to do?
God: Totally got her consent. Anyone who says otherwise will be struck down... if I exist.😬
How do we get -70 years to decide?🤔
@@queuecee I can tell by the tone of he-who-must-not-be-named, that your OP has triggered him. Good job. He also gets his panties in a twist when one mentions "blind faith" in a sentence. 😄
As a Chiropractor, I asure you, pelvic imbalance will cause leg "length" imbalance. Actual differences in leg bone length is not that common. Balancin😊g hip and leg muscles will affect an "apparent" leg length difference.
He has no idea about reality. It's obvious in everything he says.
I’m so glad an expert in science called in to tell us this important story information
Why do these people even think they have a chance to prove their fairy tale. Its not even that good compared to Norse, Greek and other mythology.
قوانين الفلك وافيزياء والبيولوجي وو وو وو تدلنا علي الخالق الصدفه لاتصنع نظام
@@ibrahimelmasry-z3k إذن من خلق الله؟
@@ibrahimelmasry-z3k جهلك بالعلم يبقيك في العصر الحجري. Also learn to use google translate if you want preach around here you idiot.
@@ibrahimelmasry-z3knope
@@ibrahimelmasry-z3k 😀No.
This is beautiful!!! So recognisable when arguing with a conspiracy theorist (including moving to another story at the end) and so completely professionally debunked. Kudos.
Thats actually a brilliant example of how science work.
Scientific community: evidence suggests organic mater can only be preserved for a million years
That one scientist: hey i found a 75 million years old that contains organic matter
Scientific community: are you sure, have you checked to make sure your test were correct and there was no contamination
Scientists: yeah everything checks out
Scientific community: we agree, huh guess we were wrong. Someone update the journals and textbooks
When I was studying physics in the 80s we had monthly visits of people showing their perpetuum mobile designs, which is against the thermodynamic laws. They would never come with a working one though and expected us to do the work.
The scientist in question was raised as a young earth creationist. She remains religious, so the kids argument is moot!
That where I recognised the name, she's the scientist who theists constantly misrepresent and tried to claim that she is now an atheist and they try constantly to discredit her despite the fact she is still very much a theist.
14:20 "but how do you know that the evidence that they are giving you is actually true?"
Have you tried asking Dr. Schweitzer?
But but but, doktor k ham told me this .................
Interesting how hard it is to distinguish the difference between sincere beliefs in nonsense and trolling.
Brian hasn't learned anything lol
Blood on a bone that shouldn't have blood on it?
Oh, well, then. Must be that one specific god you believe in. No other possible logical leap we could ever make.
It's such a tightly controlled secret that everybody knows about it.
If there is no God, then there is no Satan and if there is no Satan, there is no evil.
Evil exists, therefore God exists.
Thank God for atheism 🙏
And a good Fri-yay Morning 🌞 AXP Fans and Theists ❤❤❤
Peace Love Empathy From Australia 🇦🇺✌️🤠👍
If there is no New York, there is no Spiderman. New York exists, therefore Spiderman is real.
... I lost braincells reading this, this argument is so fucking dumb.
@@petyrkowalski9887 Yeah, that about sums it up. Why do theists still think this argument works, like it's so fucking stupid.
It wasn't liquid blood or tissue that was "fresh" but indicators that there was blood elements and preserved tissue that was dried out but still identifiable as tissue.
"Discovered blood on a dinasour bone?"
The knowlegde that blood exist preceded this scientist. Found blood on a dinasour is a much better lame argument.
*dinosaur
Paulogia made an interview with the scientist in question and the process of the discovery of the "blood" wasn't like hey look here it is. She dissovelved the bone in some chemicals for hours and it was long complex process. So of course she would be nervous to publish that, because science is about double checking. Every paleontologist with hole in their butt would be looking over her work critically. What if she made a mistake in the process? She would look like a fool in front of her entire field. So if he can't provide at least exact quote which would say that she is worried that sciencist would reject it on the base that it is "against dogma" rather then there being mistakes his argument it's pointless.
It's crazy how dull human minds are until they know the truth. American citizens are so gullible!
America, a culture that thrives on fear and mistrust and this is fed and (mis)used by religion
He makes my head hurt, I need some Tylenol.
He completely misses the point that scientists want to prove each other wrong, rather than blindly agreeing with each other.
How 'unexpected' to hear a theist caller who is completely ignorant on the point they think they're making.......
The most obnoxious scientific assertion possible was that the Universe is *not* infinitely old.
One of the most skilled and imaginative cosmologists, the astrophysicist Fred Hoyle, said "You mean it all just started with a Big Bang?" or words to that effect. The proposition was so shocking that he and two others calculated what rate of matter creation, presumably of hydrogen atoms mostly in empty space (of which there's plenty) would be required to balance the thinning out of the expansion we can observe. It turned out to be too small to have been noticed, or observable.
But their Steady State Theory, which available evidence then did not refute, implied that a sufficiently ancient sample of a more densely populated Universe would refute it. When a sufficiently distant big sample was detected, the majority of astrophysicists including Hermann Bondi, one of the Steady State three, concluded it was the Big Bang indeed that was the First Event, implying that it alone was the only event that Did Not have a cause.
This is one of the all-time classic calls on AXP! 😂
Thanks to the internet, nearly all known information is at our fingertips. Why are the little brains unwilling to avail themselves of this wonderful resource?
Yeah, this convo should've been clipped short.
Seems like she didn’t make the initial discovery, and was skeptical, and did science to write that paper!
According to Smithsonian magazine,
“She was having a hard time getting the slices to stick to a glass slide, so she sought help from a molecular biologist at the university. The biologist, Gayle Callis, happened to take the slides to a veterinary conference, where she set up the ancient samples for others to look at. One of the vets went up to Callis and said, “Do you know you have red blood cells in that bone?” Sure enough, under a microscope, it appeared that the bone was filled with red disks. Later, Schweitzer recalls, “I looked at this and I looked at this and I thought, this can’t be. Red blood cells don’t preserve.””
"So I've been on the internet lately" caller just found AOL in 2024.
1000 FREE HOURS of INTERNET...!
People don’t get the point. You have to first disbelieve EVERYTHING until proven! What’s so hard to understand?
in the Schwietzer work no blood was found. Fossils were *dissolved in acid* and the remaining organic material was released from the rock.
"God's creation is obvious, so you must believe in it. And then you must believe everything else that I say to you, no matter what and never ask me any questions. And you need to give me power over your life, doing only those things that I give you permission to do. And you need to give me money!" "My god says so."
This lady was nervous about making a scientific discovert and she was nervous, therefore science dosen't accept new info and the other scientists wanted evidence, therefore science dosen't accept new information? What?
an imaginary character is not able to create something in reality.
sad that theists claim they have a method to identify a creator from a creation, until that method is challenged and tested, then the method is exposed to be invalid.
Brian stares at cans of frozen orange juice because on the label it says "CONCENTRATE"
i did that once and NOTHING happened, haha ( no not really)
Wow. Literally every single one of Jimmy Powers' comments has been shadowed. Take the hint, Jimbo.
We know a certain burger chains products last eternally, so why not dinosaur tissue.
Missing link in the burger chain.
Op put that in my head. But only that much.
Creationists have been deliberately misrepresenting Mary Schweitzer's work for years now. Funny how Mary herself, a Christian paleontologist, disagrees with those misrepresentations. The only thing the caller has demonstrated here is his gullibility.
And Schweitzer is VERY Christian; Aron Ra interviewed her on this topic and there were a few places where she made bible-related assertions you could tell Aron wanted to jump on, but didn't & couldn't because she was his invited guest.
Broken products of blood is NOT BLOOD.
So...bolt off the starboard dingy davit is not The Titanic??
"God's Obvious Creation Is OBVIOUS!"
I agree, since we know for a fact that Odin and his brothers created the world, the world is proof of the Norse gods existence.
Hope he never sees a flat earth video he’ll be totally confused
This caller is so precious.
Dude would get blown away by the psychic surgery magic routine
They’re so used to automatically believing personal testimony.
good on yall for giving a faith healing believer the time of day
Its really embarrasing and upsetting that this caller saw videos of "legs growing out" and thought it was anything other than a trick. Oh boy.
this show should be called Cannon Fodder.
But you don't understand! They came at her with lit brands and pitchforks!
Faith is something that you believe that nobody in his right mind would believe."-- Archie Bunker
What science has disproven the existence of even a God who is believed to withhold evidence of divinity intentionally?
This is not determining whether black holes exist, where it’s not believed that a black hole is sentient who has the ability to choose whether or not to show up.
This is regarding determining whether there is a sentient being with tremendous power and complete knowledge, who is capable of making choices such as withholding evidence of their divinity on purpose in order for us to be in a position where we can rely on faith in that God.
So, how can the scientific method even be applied to making a reliable assessment as to whether such a being exists.
If it cannot really be applied to determining if such a being exists, then who are you to automatically condemn relying on faith and trying to see if one gets an assurance of truth when the scientific method cannot be applied to determining whether or not if such a God exists?
If prayer worked, we wouldn’t need hospitals or transportation.
We could use prayer to heal and transport ourselves or any object anywhere we wanted.