He agrees with Felix Zulauf who sees the financial crisis breaking in late 2020s. He also vhannels Neil Howe when he says it isn't bad enough yet to force the consensus. Still time to get ready; still no "grey champion" emerging.
george always calms me down when i get sucked into the maelstrom of current political discourse. Would love to hear his analysis of all the demographic collapse going on in china, japan, russia, germany etc.
@@FreeSpeech4All As much as that is true I find even the suggestion outlandish. I've studied both periods from a macro investment perspective and the two eras couldn't be fundamentally more different. From debt to demographics and industrial capacity and wage levels it's like night and day. This is the night part of the comparison if you were wondering. We're actually in the midst of a depression that has saw more wealth destruction than that of the dirty 30's. Economic growth has been well below trend since 2008, the financial crisis we have yet to recover from. Our money system is broken and it's not getting better. I don't know what data that gentleman is looking at, or if he looks at data at all, but it couldn't be different than what I see.
Couldn't disagree more, on all fronts. Today is nothing like the 70's. Everything is infinitely more leveraged and on an instability knife edge. If you think we're able to tick along until 2028, I have a bridge for sale.
The most important allies of the U. S. is the Anglosphere--the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Japan and Germany, the fourth and fifth largest economic power are also important allies. But it does no stop there. France by itself is an important ally.
The largest force on earth is the combination of the U. S. and its allies. By itself the U. S. is influential. However, with its allies, it is irresistible.
I appreciate the different perspectives Jay showcases on his show. Some interesting views from his guest on this video. I would not agree with some of those perspectives, but that's ok. It's good to be exposed to other ideas when contemplating complex problems.
It’s absurd for Putin or anyone to think someone would invade and try to take Moscow. Why?! Every sane person or country in Europe wants to trade and improve their citizens economic wellbeing. But Putin is paranoid.
Russia is large. But it is also cold. Paved roads are unaffordable in most of Russia because of the cold weather and short growing season for agriculture.
Modern warfare is not the old school ships, planes and tanks. While the US does have some geographical advantages, it's a lot easier to mess with the US now (cyber warfare, bio warfare, drones, etc.). Look at what the Houthis are doing with limited budgets and tech.
Todays warfare is economic, if you can destroy the Dollar all those military bases spread around the globe have to pack up and go home. The US is canabalising it's own empire to survive what baffles me is why they are going along with it so meekly.
Modern warfare isn't old school ships, planes and tanks? Well the US has literally the most modern and technologically advanced military on earth.. You make it sound like the US can't use similar tactics on everyone else.. especially things like cyber or "hybrid warfare".
Yep, the Philippines bases agreement was a major move... surprised it didn't get more airplay in the mainstream news media, even in the Asia Pacific, at the time.
An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens. It should be noted, that when Jefferson speaks of "science," he is often referring to knowledge or learning in general.He also talked about "central banks" This is why America is in trouble your comments prove we are poorly educated. We deserve everything that is coming to us.
In 1860 Russia annexed 906,000 sq km of Chinese territory (the size of Texas and Oklahoma combined). The Chinese government is bound to recover that territory in first priority of its relations with Russia. The Chinese have not forgotten the century of shame.
In response to George saying that he was stunned by how good Arab intelligence before 911 was, i'm stunned at how bad our intelligence was. Somehow it didn't raise eyebrows that at least one of their pilots getting training said he didn't need to learn how to land.
I love hearing so many different views on the coming year, I think we may end up right in the middle for 2024. I can't imagine we make it to 2028 without a crash.
A crash is different than a breaking point. I agree with Jay and George. It does not feel that the breaking point will be 2024. There is too much misaligned hope in the air. Is it the majority of the FOMO crowd and PPT that 🤔 inflate sentiment?😮
I think we should accept that China has improved dramatically and is the largest economy in the world (it's total import export is larger than the US), in every aspect it is a leading country, technology, manufacturing, human resources, productivity and ... Without China the world is in big trouble.
I was in the 8th grade in the late 1950s, and if I remember my American History correctly, our country, the United States, in forming itself with waves of immigrants and moving westward and engaging the Indians displaced the only non-immigrants (i.e. the Indians) into reservations. It is what it is, Americans.
Naked interests are all that matters in geopolitics. Everybody's hypocritical in the international arena where nobody has a monopoly on violence so the final arbiter is force of arms.
A big problem with Jay's argument about the US as an Empire is that he does not understand the text book definition of an Empire. It is one state that militarily, politically and economically dominates other states for its own economic benefit like the Ottoman Turks did.. That's not the US/Bretton Woods System
What he was trying to say was that the media regarded him as an idiot. George Friedman is one of the most brilliant geostrategic analysts of our age, but he's getting old, and doesn't speak as well as he once did.
Remember Reaganomics...This was the beginning of Slave labor in America and since this time wages have either decreased or changed little in 50 years. Reagan was the union buster President.
The Reagan administration had over hundred officials indicted, convicted or investigated for crimes. He wasn’t just an idiot, he was a patsy played by the people he hired. Third most corrupt administration in history. I’m glad George just glided over his terms. The Chinese an analysis was the meat of the interview. Jay was way over his head interviewing George. What a lightweight.
Over a million foreign troops have already crossed the border this year. We gave the phones, cash, and placed them strategically around the country. Now they wait .. for orders.
Every country can be invaded by land. The problem is, you need an invading country that has the capability of doing that. To invade the US, you need to bring armies to the North American continent, that are capable of defeating the US army. The Canadian and Mexian armies are not able to do that. They lack the manpower, budget, infrastructure, political resolve and technology. So, you'd have to ferry in armies from overseas. But that would require a navy that is strong enough to overpower the US navy. Assuming you actually want to win the war, and not just conduct a raid, you will need to bring 500,000 to 1,000,000 soldiers, since that will be the number of soldiers that will oppose you. To transport that many men, you need a gargantuan fleet of transports, escorted by enough warships to prevent the US navy, which is the largest navy in the world, from sending your men to the bottom of the sea before they can reach the shore. But the US navy will not be your only problem. The US Air Force, which is the largest air force in the world, will also try to sink your transports. It will be assisted by the US navy's aviation, which is the second largest air force in the world. All this assuming you can amass such a large army and navy in the first place. Currently, no country in the world is able to send that many men abroad. China and India have the manpower, but they're surrounded by potential enemies, who may or may not seize the chance to invade them in turn. Russia's position is even worse, as Russia has even less manpower, and has proven incapable of defeating even a third-rate power like Ukraine, and is surrounded by powerful adversaries like Turkey, Poland, China and Japan. In addition, Russia and China also need to keep their armies at home, to discourage separatists, coups d'etat and insurgents. A coalition of the European Union with Britain could potentially pull off an invasion of the US, but they lack the incentive, the willingness to take casualties, the political resolve, and the security that they will not be invaded by Russia while they're busy in America. As for Canada being a rock-solid ally of the US, yes, that is very much the case. Canada is not viable without the US. It has everything to lose and nothing to gain by antagonising the US, unless it can find a stronger ally with which to replace the US. Mexico, I'll agree with you, may be less dependable in 30-50 years.
Demographic shift in U. S. Population is aging and politics will become more like Florida. Florida is the political model for the U. S. of the years late 20s and 30s.
Russia is poor because of its climate. Russia is cold. The territorial center of Russia is further north than the territorial center of Canada. Sixty-five percent of Russia is permafrost and unsuitable for infrastructural development. There is only only one growing season in Russia.
I love the blunt statement "we conquered western Europe" although the ennemies were only Germany and Italy. I fully agree with that. The US took control of Western Europe, wether they were former ennemies, neutral or allies. I also agree with the statements that Russia had to attack because of NATO and we predicted it. Also that we don't care about Ukraine. Both are cynical and true. On the other hand, speaking of China as an economy in bad shape is true when comparing with the growth rate of the past 10 years. It is not true if we compare with westerne economies.
China is crippled? Compare a Chinese city to an American city and say that again. This guy is wrong, American companies need China more than China needs them. Where in the world is Apple going make their phone? Ohio?😂😂😂
Hoover and Congress caused the Great Depression by tight money policy and smoot hawley act, tariffs. He wasn’t just unlucky to have been the last president of a cycle.
Hmmm - @40:10: But the 911 attackers WERE detected training to fly jets and that was reported by the regional FBI, and the idea of terrorists crashing planes into buildings WAS on the US national security system's radar. Heck, part of the many on-going military exercises on 911 included a plane crash into a tower, though the exercise described it as an accidental crash. (None of this is 'conspiracy theory' stuff, btw.) They just failed to add 1+1 to get 2. I think it is totally fair to call that an "intelligence" failure, rather than a surveillance failure.
You didn't mention BRICS at all and its potential to affect things. Also, there is a company working on developing an extremely large blimp as a new more efficient means of world trade. While this technology has quite a ways to go the possible implications are enormous. China would no longer need the seas for commerce.
I wished the interviewer would just shut up. Each time Friedman spoke, i wanted clarification - what did you just say? Instead Jay just charges off at some jejune tangent. How not to do an interview.
What about the new Defense Chief of China who is of the PLN and has experience in the seas of Taiwan and the West Philippine Seas? Is this preparatory for a more aggressive confrontation in these areas?
Die amerikanische Verteidigungslinie um China herum ist eine Sicherheitszone für Amerika, aber auch eine Bedrohung für chinesische Häfen. Ist Myanmar aufgrund der geopolitischen Absichten beider in Gefahr? danke
People love anniversarys of any kind I see another depression between 2029/2030. Then we'll see infrastructure housing and military build outs just like the last time there's needs for both but they'll wait til rates and chaos comes first simple to see
The biggest loss of Gaza war to US was that US lost moral edifice on which US stood in the world. Russia through Iran and its proxies, initiated the conflict that torn apart two very important foundations on which military and economic ascendancy of US rest. Using holocaust as strategic tool, that could have been stopped in 1939 by USA/ UK, but used by British as strategy to control jewish finance, that was taken over by USA after WW2, and the moral reason to initiate war around USSR to control it resources through wall street and losing Ukraine war wherein Isreal became a casualty because it was so unprepared for it, that it committed to massacres, losing its moral foundation that modren state of Isreal was created due to Holocaust. If it was so, why did Isreal commit to massacres. Russia won morally, even when it massacred Ukraiain for just having a choice as sovereign nation to joining NATO, saved Russia by integrating its economy to East with China and India and won a war through Hamas, Hazbulla and Houthis, while also wining in global south, Muslim world and Africa. Russia won Isreal became a casuality and US lost and China without spending a single pennyvwon the world. God Bless
GF is an astute geopolitical analyst! I’ve followed him for over a decade. Spot on.👏👏👏
He agrees with Felix Zulauf who sees the financial crisis breaking in late 2020s. He also vhannels Neil Howe when he says it isn't bad enough yet to force the consensus. Still time to get ready; still no "grey champion" emerging.
george always calms me down when i get sucked into the maelstrom of current political discourse. Would love to hear his analysis of all the demographic collapse going on in china, japan, russia, germany etc.
This is the weirdest interview I've seen in a long time. I've lived both during the 70's and now and this IS NOT like the 70's at all.
@@FreeSpeech4All As much as that is true I find even the suggestion outlandish. I've studied both periods from a macro investment perspective and the two eras couldn't be fundamentally more different. From debt to demographics and industrial capacity and wage levels it's like night and day. This is the night part of the comparison if you were wondering. We're actually in the midst of a depression that has saw more wealth destruction than that of the dirty 30's. Economic growth has been well below trend since 2008, the financial crisis we have yet to recover from. Our money system is broken and it's not getting better. I don't know what data that gentleman is looking at, or if he looks at data at all, but it couldn't be different than what I see.
This guy lives in an alternative universe.
@@FreeSpeech4Allyour expectations wrong then
@@FreeSpeech4Allseriously doubt the dollar will be ditched anytime soon.
Great guest. Things have to get worse before there is a change in the cycle.
Great interview of Dr. Friedman. Thank you.
There’s no open borders policy. Only policy change is not separating children from parents.
Always a pleasure to hear from Dr. George Friedman. Based on the comments, he went over the heads of most viewers.
"We can increase the empire by destroying traditional america and conquering western europe." Who is "we"?
the oligarchs adviser joker
J's
Excellent discussion Gentlemen
Couldn't disagree more, on all fronts. Today is nothing like the 70's. Everything is infinitely more leveraged and on an instability knife edge. If you think we're able to tick along until 2028, I have a bridge for sale.
People have been saying this since 1875
I'm with you andrew. I'm watching loads of other analysts say that this year is when everything hits the fan. I got my popcorn ready
The most important allies of the U. S. is the Anglosphere--the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Japan and Germany, the fourth and fifth largest economic power are also important allies. But it does no stop there. France by itself is an important ally.
The largest force on earth is the combination of the U. S. and its allies. By itself the U. S. is influential. However, with its allies, it is irresistible.
I appreciate the different perspectives Jay showcases on his show. Some interesting views from his guest on this video. I would not agree with some of those perspectives, but that's ok. It's good to be exposed to other ideas when contemplating complex problems.
It’s absurd for Putin or anyone to think someone would invade and try to take Moscow. Why?! Every sane person or country in Europe wants to trade and improve their citizens economic wellbeing. But Putin is paranoid.
In the early 1930s Germany was a cripple. There was no reason to think it would be at the gates of Moscow 10 years later.
Russia is large. But it is also cold. Paved roads are unaffordable in most of Russia because of the cold weather and short growing season for agriculture.
Tunnels are the only way.
I cannot tolerate background music. Too distracting.
It sux.
please shut off the noise pollution in the background.
"Noise pollution" is exactly what it is! I was able to suffer it for 10 seconds, then I skipped froward.
Modern warfare is not the old school ships, planes and tanks. While the US does have some geographical advantages, it's a lot easier to mess with the US now (cyber warfare, bio warfare, drones, etc.). Look at what the Houthis are doing with limited budgets and tech.
Todays warfare is economic, if you can destroy the Dollar all those military bases spread around the globe have to pack up and go home. The US is canabalising it's own empire to survive what baffles me is why they are going along with it so meekly.
Wait until it can no longer be Covert. 😢
Modern warfare isn't old school ships, planes and tanks? Well the US has literally the most modern and technologically advanced military on earth..
You make it sound like the US can't use similar tactics on everyone else.. especially things like cyber or "hybrid warfare".
The US spies on everyone 10 times more than anyone spies on it
@@chickenfishhybrid44Tell the Houthis.
WhataGoober
Yea, the host.
Yep, the Philippines bases agreement was a major move... surprised it didn't get more airplay in the mainstream news media, even in the Asia Pacific, at the time.
Too many ads.
Prabhupada saves
It's a pity the founders never knew what a coporatocracy would be like or they might have made sure they were kept in check as well.
An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens. It should be noted, that when Jefferson speaks of "science," he is often referring to knowledge or learning in general.He also talked about "central banks" This is why America is in trouble your comments prove we are poorly educated. We deserve everything that is coming to us.
Excellent report 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍💯
In 1860 Russia annexed 906,000 sq km of Chinese territory (the size of Texas and Oklahoma combined). The Chinese government is bound to recover that territory in first priority of its relations with Russia. The Chinese have not forgotten the century of shame.
Brilliant guy.
Interesting thought about the 50 years of change cycle in the USA. Perhaps the period the cycle is changing if change is not expected to happen 2024.
The problem is not other countries,it’s Washington DC.
In response to George saying that he was stunned by how good Arab intelligence before 911 was, i'm stunned at how bad our intelligence was.
Somehow it didn't raise eyebrows that at least one of their pilots getting training said he didn't need to learn how to land.
Please don't play backround music as in the intro, it interferes with listening !
Yea, it sux.
I love hearing so many different views on the coming year, I think we may end up right in the middle for 2024. I can't imagine we make it to 2028 without a crash.
A crash is different than a breaking point.
I agree with Jay and George. It does not feel that the breaking point will be 2024. There is too much misaligned hope in the air. Is it the majority of the FOMO crowd and PPT that 🤔 inflate sentiment?😮
I think we should accept that China has improved dramatically and is the largest economy in the world (it's total import export is larger than the US), in every aspect it is a leading country, technology, manufacturing, human resources, productivity and ...
Without China the world is in big trouble.
I was in the 8th grade in the late 1950s, and if I remember my American History correctly, our country, the United States, in forming itself with waves of immigrants and moving westward and engaging the Indians displaced the only non-immigrants (i.e. the Indians) into reservations. It is what it is, Americans.
Main takeaway is that things will get much worse before they get better. I agree.
thank you Jay .... for making evil obvius
Alex Jones literally told you to expect 9/11. Pity he is deliberately ignored/attacked/discredited/marginalised.
George do you know who prabhupada is?
This intro was fascinating 👏
Prabhupada jai
Its scary to see the overall level of geopolitics understanding in the US
The problem with America arming Ukraine is not that it does not serve American interest, it is that America is hypocritical about it
Naked interests are all that matters in geopolitics. Everybody's hypocritical in the international arena where nobody has a monopoly on violence so the final arbiter is force of arms.
A big problem with Jay's argument about the US as an Empire is that he does not understand the text book definition of an Empire. It is one state that militarily, politically and economically dominates other states for its own economic benefit like the Ottoman Turks did.. That's not the US/Bretton Woods System
Go back and watch this a second time. The man was into his cups when they hit the go button.
Lost me when he said Reagan was an idiot...
What he was trying to say was that the media regarded him as an idiot.
George Friedman is one of the most brilliant geostrategic analysts of our age, but he's getting old, and doesn't speak as well as he once did.
@@jamesburke3803 this is dude full of shit
Hes the idiot
Remember Reaganomics...This was the beginning of Slave labor in America and since this time wages have either decreased or changed little in 50 years. Reagan was the union buster President.
The Reagan administration had over hundred officials indicted, convicted or investigated for crimes. He wasn’t just an idiot, he was a patsy played by the people he hired. Third most corrupt administration in history. I’m glad George just glided over his terms. The Chinese an analysis was the meat of the interview. Jay was way over his head interviewing George. What a lightweight.
Interesting to compare his thoughts with Neil Howe and the coming generational turning, he suggests may be in the early 2030's
this guy says the us cant be invaded by land-like mexico and canada are rock solid allies with us-wtf? typical normie historian
Over a million foreign troops have already crossed the border this year. We gave the phones, cash, and placed them strategically around the country. Now they wait .. for orders.
he went over your head buddy
Every country can be invaded by land. The problem is, you need an invading country that has the capability of doing that.
To invade the US, you need to bring armies to the North American continent, that are capable of defeating the US army. The Canadian and Mexian armies are not able to do that. They lack the manpower, budget, infrastructure, political resolve and technology. So, you'd have to ferry in armies from overseas. But that would require a navy that is strong enough to overpower the US navy. Assuming you actually want to win the war, and not just conduct a raid, you will need to bring 500,000 to 1,000,000 soldiers, since that will be the number of soldiers that will oppose you.
To transport that many men, you need a gargantuan fleet of transports, escorted by enough warships to prevent the US navy, which is the largest navy in the world, from sending your men to the bottom of the sea before they can reach the shore.
But the US navy will not be your only problem. The US Air Force, which is the largest air force in the world, will also try to sink your transports. It will be assisted by the US navy's aviation, which is the second largest air force in the world.
All this assuming you can amass such a large army and navy in the first place. Currently, no country in the world is able to send that many men abroad. China and India have the manpower, but they're surrounded by potential enemies, who may or may not seize the chance to invade them in turn. Russia's position is even worse, as Russia has even less manpower, and has proven incapable of defeating even a third-rate power like Ukraine, and is surrounded by powerful adversaries like Turkey, Poland, China and Japan. In addition, Russia and China also need to keep their armies at home, to discourage separatists, coups d'etat and insurgents.
A coalition of the European Union with Britain could potentially pull off an invasion of the US, but they lack the incentive, the willingness to take casualties, the political resolve, and the security that they will not be invaded by Russia while they're busy in America.
As for Canada being a rock-solid ally of the US, yes, that is very much the case. Canada is not viable without the US. It has everything to lose and nothing to gain by antagonising the US, unless it can find a stronger ally with which to replace the US.
Mexico, I'll agree with you, may be less dependable in 30-50 years.
The U. S. has regressions and advances. In all, the advances outweigh the regressions.
The poverty of Russia is the cold climate.
Great interview
Demographic shift in U. S. Population is aging and politics will become more like Florida. Florida is the political model for the U. S. of the years late 20s and 30s.
Nah, AZ
This is a difficult discussion to get. To need war to make money? Your guest lost me with all the necessary war talk to make money.
That was awesome
Were the 911 hijackers that good or was it or was it a lack of communication and diligence by the federal agency?
Brilliant
“How did Israeli intelligence miss the Hamas attack plan?” .. it didn’t. It wanted it to happen
It is possible. 1973 wants Jerusalem. 2023 wants Hamas out. 9/11 wants USA Patriot Act. JFK, Lyndon Johnson wants power. Watergate, dems want to rule
🤔
Russia is poor because of its climate. Russia is cold. The territorial center of Russia is further north than the territorial center of Canada. Sixty-five percent of Russia is permafrost and unsuitable for infrastructural development. There is only only one growing season in Russia.
Total military industrial complex LIAR
I love the blunt statement "we conquered western Europe" although the ennemies were only Germany and Italy. I fully agree with that. The US took control of Western Europe, wether they were former ennemies, neutral or allies.
I also agree with the statements that Russia had to attack because of NATO and we predicted it. Also that we don't care about Ukraine. Both are cynical and true.
On the other hand, speaking of China as an economy in bad shape is true when comparing with the growth rate of the past 10 years. It is not true if we compare with westerne economies.
is it a new video or recorded before?
China is crippled? Compare a Chinese city to an American city and say that again. This guy is wrong, American companies need China more than China needs them. Where in the world is Apple going make their phone? Ohio?😂😂😂
India --- Apple is already in the process of shifting manufacturing to India & Vietnam
the supplier is dispensable when labor is cheaper elsewhere. bye bye china
No China needs Taiwan and Japan (and the US) and their far more advanced technical capabilities-and a lot more women and children
it's nothing new he predicted collapse of China 10 years ago. This guy is basically the same as Peter Zeihan Bias people.
Hoover and Congress caused the Great Depression by tight money policy and smoot hawley act, tariffs. He wasn’t just unlucky to have been the last president of a cycle.
I dont agree with him at all l saw him in Budapest
Hmmm - @40:10: But the 911 attackers WERE detected training to fly jets and that was reported by the regional FBI, and the idea of terrorists crashing planes into buildings WAS on the US national security system's radar. Heck, part of the many on-going military exercises on 911 included a plane crash into a tower, though the exercise described it as an accidental crash. (None of this is 'conspiracy theory' stuff, btw.) They just failed to add 1+1 to get 2. I think it is totally fair to call that an "intelligence" failure, rather than a surveillance failure.
The Chinese caused this reaction from the US. It’s own them.
this man grew old being an optimist disconnected from reality......
Facts matter.
Marjorie Taylor Greene doesn't care about second and third order impacts not just Ukraine. MAGA regard isolationism and greatness.
You didn't mention BRICS at all and its potential to affect things. Also, there is a company working on developing an extremely large blimp as a new more efficient means of world trade. While this technology has quite a ways to go the possible implications are enormous. China would no longer need the seas for commerce.
The cargo capacity of the largest forecast blimp is only 20,000 kilograms. That's a 'drop in the ocean' of needed capacity.
Cant watch you any more, there is more adverts than the video itself...
Damn---"-Greed is Good!" now "War is Good!"
Uncle Volva is an affectionate name for President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin in Russia.
Who is the biggest Nazi in Russia? Uncle Volva.
Thanks, definitely a refreshing view on our times that gives me much to think about.
Friedman has been wrong about virtually every prediction that he has ever made. Why does anyone still listen to this old goofball?
At this point I just watch these videos as entertainment purpose. It's laughable on how stupid he sounds.
I wished the interviewer would just shut up. Each time Friedman spoke, i wanted clarification - what did you just say? Instead Jay just charges off at some jejune tangent. How not to do an interview.
What about the new Defense Chief of China who is of the PLN and has experience in the seas of Taiwan and the West Philippine Seas? Is this preparatory for a more aggressive confrontation in these areas?
There have been over 20 million Ukrainian casualties from the Ukraine War, 20 million refugees and 300,000 combat casualties.
Are immigrants almost ever actually welcomed anywhere? Certainly never universally by the population.
These guys actually believe the "official" 9/11 narrative.😂😂😂 You guys live in fantasy land. Did you take your "safe and effectives" also?😂😂😂
Jay still believes the box cutter fairy tale.
Texas will vote for Texas TO SECEDE
Poor George so out of touch with America.
your out of touch his information and facts
go Jay !!
Amazing work
more please 🙏
Die amerikanische Verteidigungslinie um China herum ist eine Sicherheitszone für Amerika, aber auch eine Bedrohung für chinesische Häfen. Ist Myanmar aufgrund der geopolitischen Absichten beider in Gefahr? danke
Not worse today? Seems to me he's missing something.
People love anniversarys of any kind I see another depression between 2029/2030. Then we'll see infrastructure housing and military build outs just like the last time there's needs for both but they'll wait til rates and chaos comes first simple to see
This guy needs to talk to Douglas McGregor. He’s definitely lacking in military understanding
I think that the Chinese are a bit like a pro athlete or a lottery winner: they came into money very quickly and spent it too fast and recklessly.
@9:49 Reagan is his hero lol 😂
Whaat???? This guy is delusional
I like George very much but he is almost as difficult to understand as Noam Chomskey.
The biggest loss of Gaza war to US was that US lost moral edifice on which US stood in the world. Russia through Iran and its proxies, initiated the conflict that torn apart two very important foundations on which military and economic ascendancy of US rest. Using holocaust as strategic tool, that could have been stopped in 1939 by USA/ UK, but used by British as strategy to control jewish finance, that was taken over by USA after WW2, and the moral reason to initiate war around USSR to control it resources through wall street and losing Ukraine war wherein Isreal became a casualty because it was so unprepared for it, that it committed to massacres, losing its moral foundation that modren state of Isreal was created due to Holocaust. If it was so, why did Isreal commit to massacres. Russia won morally, even when it massacred Ukraiain for just having a choice as sovereign nation to joining NATO, saved Russia by integrating its economy to East with China and India and won a war through Hamas, Hazbulla and Houthis, while also wining in global south, Muslim world and Africa. Russia won Isreal became a casuality and US lost and China without spending a single pennyvwon the world. God Bless
Always a thoughtful conversation. I learned so much. Thank you
displaying books behind him does not mean anything. It doesn't make him an expert.
Dude lost me when he spoke ill of Reagan
❤❤
Not so smart
War was not boost for Poland, keep your wars out of Poland.
Out of date and narrow views. And worse, wrong.
Duration