HMS Fife (D20) gunnery exercise ~1975

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2014
  • Royal Navy County-class destroyer HMS Fife (D20) gunnery exercise. Extract from ‘Action Navy’ (COI 1254) 1975. Official govt film uploaded as fair use.
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @elcyd
    @elcyd 2 роки тому +13

    I served on HMS Fife and in 1975 she was in refit getting B turret removed to make way for Exocet Launchers.

    • @jyralnadreth4442
      @jyralnadreth4442 Рік тому

      County class DDGs definitely had Anti Ship Warfare advantages over the Type 42 and Type 45 especially in Gunnery range. Good ships...would have been great to see them if they had Sea Slug replaced by Sea Dart

  • @postiesteve
    @postiesteve Рік тому +2

    Brings back memories for me. I was on her 79 to 80. Polly Parrott. DB tanky

  • @alanlane3670
    @alanlane3670 3 роки тому +4

    Brings back memories.....

  • @stevefoley1021
    @stevefoley1021 Рік тому +1

    I served on hms fife 1974

  • @andrewwilde3389
    @andrewwilde3389 Рік тому +3

    Brilliant warships, replacing a 4.5 turret with Exocet was a logical thing to do but the further aft you went the more these ships armaments turned into a joke. 2Omm Oerlikons, Seacat bonfire night rockets and a Seaslug missile system which had taken for ever to develop the RAF Bloodhound for warship use, and was an absolute damage control nightmare. In fact HMS Fife was the closest any of the County Class came to being lost due in part to the absurdity of the missile loading and storage system. As for a side loading helicopter hangar, well just who on earth thought that one up?

    • @jyralnadreth4442
      @jyralnadreth4442 Рік тому

      Sea Slug was an outright liability, at least Seacat had a guidance system that worked within littoral combat when Radars of the day had handicaps with clutter (San Carlos Bay specifically). I have often wondered why Slug was never replaced with Sea Dart or even another pair of Quad Seacat launchers or Bofors

  • @gregtaylor6146
    @gregtaylor6146 2 роки тому +7

    Needed in the English Channel right now.

    • @l361985
      @l361985 2 роки тому +1

      Why would the navy shell civilians in the channel? Lunatic.

  • @cristianbello4045
    @cristianbello4045 2 роки тому

    Mi padre estuvo en la dotacion que fue a a buscar el HMS FIFE a Inglaterra en 1987, despues DLH Blanco encalada fue remodelado 92-93 y dado de baja el 2003 en Chile.

  • @clangerbasher
    @clangerbasher 9 років тому +1

    Awesome.

  • @kilderkin
    @kilderkin Рік тому +1

    They couldn't have got there without STOKERS!

    • @pooletrainboy
      @pooletrainboy Рік тому

      I know they had Combined steam and gas but did they burn coal still?

  • @peterhall4086
    @peterhall4086 5 років тому +8

    The sound overdub of the firing is crap.

  • @anthonymosley1326
    @anthonymosley1326 Рік тому

    Have it ...

  • @billmason2785
    @billmason2785 2 роки тому +1

    "This is Yankee foxtrot"

  • @diamonddog257
    @diamonddog257 6 років тому +5

    as muslim Burqas become fashionable in the Royal Navy .......

  • @Rutherford_Inchworm_III
    @Rutherford_Inchworm_III 2 роки тому

    WW2 era light cruiser gunnery in 1975... can you say post-war malaise? The first thing they did was tear out those guns and put in Exocet launchers (once they learned from the Argies what they could do).

    • @johnandhayleysmart5651
      @johnandhayleysmart5651 2 роки тому +7

      The exocets were there prior to the the Falklands and she never went down South. She was in refit in '82. Glamorgan and Antrim were the batch 2 GMD's that went. As for ww2 design, the County class was a breakthrough. 4 gas turbines and 2 steam running through 2 shafts. WW2 my ass.

    • @iceman7975
      @iceman7975 Рік тому +2

      @@johnandhayleysmart5651 ,well said , fine looking ships at that to. Many people like to criticise with hindsight. Pity they were not upgraded with the emerging technology and weapons, but as you rightly say these ships were a breakthrough and brought the Royal Navy into the missile age , when many other navies were still reliant on traditional methods.

    • @billcook7483
      @billcook7483 Рік тому

      @@johnandhayleysmart5651 Well said, you just shot down the knobhead good and proper !

    • @jyralnadreth4442
      @jyralnadreth4442 Рік тому

      @@iceman7975 The County Class were great ships.....They could slap a Type 42 Silly in a Gunnery fight especially pre-exocet refit. Plenty of room for upgrades, damage resilient considering how Glamorgan took an Exocet and still made it home, they were very well rounded with AAW, ASuW and ASW....something that Type 42 and Type 45 have not achieved fully (Type 42 Lacked a Dedicated Anti Ship missile and until very very recently the Type 45 was a 1 trick AAW pony because the 1985 dated Harpoons had to be removed) TBHJ Seaslug from what I have read would be a better Anti Ship or Land Attack missile than a SAM