ikr I'm British and I think this is disgusting. It's wrong, sexist and racist. Racist because it's treating Muslim women different to all other women, simply because they're Muslim. It's not fair on them. I say "racist", though I know Islam's not a race.
R u guys racist . We muslim have to respect religions ok. I want this to be clear the people that are terorist are not muslim. They are fakes bit can still be forgiven
Why do Muslim want to have sharia courts in foreign country when there are local laws present. If u want Sharia court go back to the Islamic countries from where u came. If they don't want to go back then they have to follow the law of the land as simple as it gets.
We know that patriarchal societies favor males and males have more power But no society teaches to hit wives. And no religion except you know what allows it. Its pathetic 'cos religion means following a god's guidances. How come a gd teaches to hit wives? Its pathetic.
Anybody can google the scholarly Islamic discussions onwife ebeating and see there indeed exists different interpretation mainly because the word has several meanings in Arabic but also the context of the use of the word is relevant. It's not a secret. There are opposing views and the role of culture can not be omitted when people seek to justify violence against women. But I think its best people seek the knowledge themselves.
where has gone my old england? england land of hope and glory, illegal sharia courts in england?? people of england you must react to this threat against basic human rights
I'm sure the Moslem religion has to abide by the laws in England. We have religions in the US that want to sacrifice animals. But, US laws says it's a crime. They can go to prison to or that plus fines. Of course they still try secretly.
A man who condones wife beating is like someone who sets up a wrestling match between a heavy weight and a middle weight, there is little chance of a fair fight, yet he is routing for the bully, in fact putting money on him. This is his mentality. To think people look up to him is highly disturbing and unethical. He will be accountable for his actions.
@@Greatsprit1 I am not afraid of Mohammed, even though he was okay with stealing, murder, slavery, pedophilia, wife beating, and all around thug ways. No, he was just a man, and not a very good one at that. Mohammed did not care about the things that really mattered, he was put in place by the Catholics who would not convert people in that region to their religion, so they had to make up one, that is why Mohammed married a nun, who does that? Do not fear a man, fear God, All That Is, for Mohammed does not care what you did in your life, God does.
Not acceptable, if a man beats his wife and has a restraining order the wife and children needs protection.If such laws are not blocked then shariah license will be revoked.
Like all abrahamic religions they will never be able to escape the roots of their medieval and backward origins. It is never ok to hit someone unless it is self defence. Woman have never enjoyed being seen as lesser. We are all human beings and deserve equal treatment in all matters. We largely have this in the west and should not be dragged backwards by the musings of ancient peoples.
+Liam Thoresen Liam there are some issues with your reasoning, please clarify: Democracy is older than most religions, should we abandon democracy as a backward ancient practice? If a five year old child drowns her two year old sister, should we punish the five year old child like we would an adult?
In regards to your first point the democracy we use today is not the same as such was used by the ancient greeks for example. That would be impractical with our current population size. So even this is not the same as it once was. I did not mean to imply that we should abandon all that came before us. Simply that it is silly that we still use the same stories some of our ancestors used to define our own lives, which are vastly different from theirs. In regards to your second point I am unsure where this is coming from. Of course the child is not punished in the same way. However some punishment may still be received depending on the variables. Was it by accident? Child's mental condition etc. However I am unsure how this relates to my points...
Liam Thoresen Thanks for the response, I appreciate your objective analysis. I agree that some stories from the past are very specific to those people and circumstances. I would be silly to transpose one cultural narrative onto another. However, we can benefit from some ancient concepts such as racial equality and religious pluralism. Muslim women are not inferior morally, legally, or politically (such positions aren't based in the religion). Rather than being fossilized in the past, Islamic law is constantly renewed to fit well in new times and places - Islamic jurisprudence is dynamic. The fellow featured in the video happens to be an ultra-conservative litteralist, people of such persuasions always represent a tiny minority regarding religious though. - My second point was based on your statement: "We are all human beings and deserve equal treatment in all matters." My absurd example demonstrated that equal treatment for all people in all matters would yield unjust results, there has to be flexibility based on the specific circumstances for equity's sake.
Ah I understand your meaning now although the idea that we are all equal really refers to all human adults. No distinction should be made between them for race, class, gender etc. This of course does not mean children should not be treated with fairness, respect and equality because they should but I appreciate that in certain situations they are handled in a way more appropriate for a younger mind. My statement while still true should be looked at with nuance and not so literally. I would agree that we can often benefit from the ideas of our predecessors and in all honesty I have less problem with the idea of more progressive religious people than the more conservative as you say. However I would propose that the conservatives have a more true interpretation of the religion. I am also still skeptical of the idea of a religions own level of jurisprudence. Especially with such conservatives I find that the more objective and secular law of the land would be far more fair and balanced. Please do not mistake this as a hatred for religion/islam (I converse with Christians similiarly) but I detest the idea of people being treated as less than equals or unfairly.
"No distinction should be made between them for race, class, gender etc." Agreed. "My statement while still true should be looked at with nuance and not so literally." Based on your other response, I got a feeling that such was your position, jolly good. "However I would propose that the conservatives have a more true interpretation of the religion." Actually, in the Islamic tradition there are many schools of legal thought, all considered equally valid in interpretation. Conservatism/literalism has strong appeal in times of confusion and desperation, people always prefer decisiveness to nuance. The Muslim world is in such a state of chaos unfortunately. That being said, the followers of the conservative/literalist school of Islamic law, al-Hanbaliyah, account for only 2% of Muslims. They are heavily promoted by petro-dollars, so they seem to have more clout than they really do. We consider diversity of opinion in legal matters as a blessing. This allows different cultures to adopt whichever way suits them best (the historical Islamic legal systems of Senegalese Muslims differed from Siberian Muslims, which differed from Malay Muslims etc. The phenomenon of making a one size fits all sharia system, especially from a narrow cultural context and then exporting it to another is an absurd innovation which diverges from tradition of Islamic pluralism. " I find that the more objective and secular law of the land would be far more fair and balanced." Objectivity is the cornerstone of all legal systems, even religious ones. This is a key principle for establishing truth and implementing justice. Secularism however, has some issues. Unlike objectivity which is a principle for establishing truth, secularism is an ideology (not a truth finding method). If a community doesn't subscribe to a certain ideology, would it be fair to impose it upon them by force? "Please do not mistake this as a hatred for religion/islam (I converse with Christians similarly) but I detest the idea of people being treated as less than equals or unfairly." Your objective evenhanded thinking is admirable, such conversations are beneficial to all involved. You also have my support in endorsing fairness and equality. Social justice is one of the key pillars which a Muslim should strive for. "O believers! Stand firm for justice and bear true witness for the sake of God, even though it be against yourselves, your parents or your relatives. It does not matter whether the party is rich or poor - God is well wisher of both. So let not your selfish desires swerve you from justice. If you distort your testimony or decline to give it, then you should remember that God is fully aware of your actions." Quran 4:135
@@clayevins6795it shouldn’t be in our country full stop, but it is, go look up the Islamic law for yourself and then you can learn about it, it’s the opposite to our laws, then ask yourself why is it aloud and who allowed it
@Althaf L S Yes you are right can i speak with you about your view I have a video on my channel , it explainning there is no beating of the woman in islam
@Althaf L S واضربوهن, لا يوجد ضرب للمرأة في القرآن******** There is no beating of the woman in the Quaran watching the video for more explications. ua-cam.com/video/_qiQM41vL8k/v-deo.html
واضربوهن, لا يوجد ضرب للمرأة في القرآن******** There is no beating of the woman in the Quaran watching the video for more explications. ua-cam.com/video/_qiQM41vL8k/v-deo.html
I'm Irish and disgusted this is allowed in the UK. I lived in the UK for years, and I lived according to the rules and regulations in that Country. If they want to live in the UK, they should have to live by British law and regulations, if they don't want to, they can always go back to an Islamist Country. I blame 15 or more years of Tory Governments for this, the police have also ignore sharia law being applied on the streets of the UK, near their Mosques, where British people have been assaulted for improperly dressed or drinking. This is why you now have mayhem on the streets of Britain, in 2024. I fail to understand it, above all other Nationalities, including English, Muslims appear to be able to do as they please.
Short answer: yes. There are Hadith that describe Muhhamed explicitly saying wife beating is permissible. There is also centuries of Sunni legal tradition of allowing wife-beating on that basis.
Bangladesh is a muslim majority country. Pakistan is also Muslim majority country. Pakistan had muslim PM in past. Bangladesh has been ruling by woman for 25 years. Bangladesh will celebrate 50 years anniversary in 2021. Show me 1 country in west with 160 million people where they are ruled by woman for 25 years.
These courts should not be allowed. We should not be setting up a regulatory body. We should be closing them down. I am shocked that a sub culture is being allowed to operate. Also shocked that the safeguarding of the children was not put at the centre of this piece.
they don't know how many sharia courts there is in Britain ? .. But then she says about 100 .. why don't we know how many there is ? .. everything else is accounted for
As a Muslim I believe this is wrong The Quran clearly states that you should abide by the law in the land and should not implement Islam by force So as a Muslim living in Britain I'm obligated by Islam to follow the British law and I wouldn't have it any other way I believe that if these places were to remain open they should only advise and not have any power to do anything .
Jay Umm Tay " The Qur’an clearly says, “There is no compulsion in religion” (2:257). Furthermore, Shariah obliges Muslims to be loyal to their nation of residence. Therefore, American Muslims must adhere to the US Constitution as the supreme law of the land." So the same applies to the UK Hope that helps
@@Jf_1900 no it doesnt help at all because you have still not provided any references of the chapter and verse in the Quran which tells muslims they must obey the laws of the non muslim lands they live in. Because there are no references. So why are you lying?
@@PurePeacePower Sayyiduna Abd Allah ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said: “It is necessary upon a Muslim to listen to and obey the ruler, as long as one is not ordered to carry out a sin. If he is commanded to commit a sin, then there is no adherence and obedience.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2796 & Sunan Tirmidhi)
@@PurePeacePower All I can add is that there are many many misconceptions in the minds of people as they only listen to those who oppose and construe the message of Islam.
@@Jf_1900 thats a eeference to a Hadith not the Quran. If Allah has not commanded muslims in the Quran, then from where and from who do all these injunctions in Hadiths come from? Does Allah not say that the Quran is complete and there is no doubt in it? Then why all these Hadiths to try and explain?
if a persons does not pay taxes or hides them from the state is a crime. Why muslims can exercise law that is not legal and still be free? This is non-sense!
You're all good at judging other religion. Now pls explain this verse: "Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves." (Numbers 31:17-18)
Your right to quote that verse because since islam is a concoction of bible thora zoroastrian religions the final product being islam your counter attacks using christianity is just rationalising to justify all thats wrong with islam you in your quotes omit the fact that these religions have evolved whilst islam has stayed in the 7th century
Here is the opinion of a legit senior shariah scholar in Saudi Arabia about an abusive husband: "It is *not permissible* for him to hit his wife in a way that *causes her to bleed or hurts* her... it is *permissible for her to ask for a divorce so as to relieve herself* of the harm this is befalling her, and *it is permissible for her to tell the police so that they can protect her against her husband's aggression* by making him promise not to beat her and threatening him with imprisonment if he does that." - Sh. Saleh Al-Munajjad (scholar in KSA)
Let me see people shouldn’t question a man hitting his wife, what about if the woman takes revenge on the husband what happens.. it’s very convenient. He’s clearly dodging the hard questions - coinciding with the treble in his voice and increased pitch.. classic signs of lying
+Atheist Lehman ...and the edited interview gave a bit more context to that cherry picked statement. He basically then said that the woman should report it should she choose to do so. "The word beat has different interpretations.." *EDIT* (context withheld again) Don't you *EDIT* see the *EDIT* blatant *EDIT* misrepresentation going *EDIT* *EDIT* *EDIT* *EDIT* *EDIT* on *EDIT* *EDIT*. I don't agree with him on everything, but you can see he's context is edited out *EDIT*
jagoman85, Actually, he quoted the Sunnah: Abu Dawud (2142) - "The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife." And also: “It was narrated that Ash'ath bin Qais said: "I was a guest (at the home) of 'Umar one night, and in the middle of the night he went and hit his wife, and I separated them. When he went to bed he said to me: 'O Ash'ath, learn from me something that I heard from the Messenger of Allah" A man should not be asked why he beats his wife, and do not go to sleep until you have prayed the Witr."' And I forgot the third thing." Sunan Ibn Majah 3:9:1986 Also 1. You no references. 2. You gave no context. You haven’t given any support to your argument.
@Ak Proof Islam promotes equality: “The most complete believer in faith is the best in morals, and the best among you is the best to their wives.” (Tirmidhi) “And among God’s signs is this: He created for you mates from amongst yourselves (males […] for females and vice versa) that you might find tranquility and peace in them. And he has put love and kindness among you. Herein surely are signs for those who reflect.” (Qur’an, 30: 21) “They (your wives) are your garment and you are a garment for them.” (Qur’an, 2: 187) “O Messenger of Allah! Who is most deserving of my fine treatment?” He said, “Your mother, then your mother, then your mother, then your father, then your nearest, then nearest.” (Narrated by Abu Hurairah - Bukhari and Muslim) “Observe your duty to Allah in respect to the women, and treat them well.” (Prophet Muhammed’s Last Sermon) “I went to the Apostle of Allah (PBUH) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.” (Narrated by Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri - Abu Dawud) “Verily, women are the twin halves of men.” (Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi) “Their Lord responded to them: “I never fail to reward any worker among you for any work you do, be you male or female - you are equal to one another.” (Qur’an, 3: 195) “The believers, men and women, are helpers, supporters, friends and protectors of one another, they enjoin all that is good, and forbid all that is evil, they offer their prayers perfectly, and give Zakah (obligatory charity) and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah will bestow Mercy on them. Surely Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.” (Qur’an, 9: 71)
The prophet Mohammed's wife (peace be upon him) said:“Never did the Messenger of Allah ﷺ strike anyone with his hand, neither a servant nor a woman, unless he was fighting in the cause of Allah. He never took revenge upon anyone for the wrong done to him, and would [only] carry out legal retributions for the sake of Allah when the injunctions of Allah were violated.” Reference: Muslim (644) There is no ambiguity in the matter, our prophet Mohammed never hit his woman, and we muslims are ordered to emulate the prophet. Please, my dear non muslim viewers, do not think our religion orders us to beat our woman folk, this is far from the truth.
@@musqul8566 There is no wife beating verse in the way you are interpreting it. The verse you are referring to speaks about when a woman is rebellious against her husband, that he is able to "strike" her with a miswak (a tooth brush that was used back in the day and till this day aswell). The commentary of that verse states that it cannot be on the face, or leave a mark on the body nor can the arm be raised above the shoulder. It is a symbolic "strike" not designed to cause physical pain to the woman.
@@a.Bader97 what is symbolic strike. We are talking about displining someone who rebelled. And what is rebellion? Disobeying the husband? Striking someone with a toothbrush is not disciplining them. It will infuriate them further. Allah with all his wisdom couldn't come up with a better solution for husband wife quarel? Did he consider the fact that the woman might hurt the man in his sleep to revenge for his 'disciplining'. Did he also consider the physical harm it can cause, the psychological harm, humiliation, trauma, how it will affect the children. If I ever see my dad raise his hand to my mom it will be the last time he raises a hand. Did Allah consider that?
@@musqul8566 Why have you assumed its a form of disciplined in the traditional sense? did my clarification not prove to you that the husband has not been ordered to cause pain to his wife if she rebels against him. You claim it will infuriate them further. Absolutely not- it wil have the opposite effect. If a woman continues to rebel against her husband and he decides to exercise the striking in the way mentioned, it will only help diffuse the situation as the woman the man decided to exercise a physical reaction in a very limited way. The woman will see that despite the anger/frustration of the man, he was viligant and disclipined enough in getting his message across without hurting his wife. It is also beneficial to read the whole verse which many people (like you) have not done: Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand. You're speculation about woman getting revenge in the night is nonsensical. You are speaking in uncertainty and questioning God as to why he didn't consider your mere speculation. Speculation is useless- we deal with evidence. You've made a very weak point. Lastly i told you there is no physical harm caused to the woman. This verse applies in very niche circumstances. Read the verse and you can see. Since there is no physical harm, why are you then saying there may physical and psychological harm/trauma. Stop attempting to predict scenarios that are completely opposite to the nature of the verse. The verse does not intend for a man to cause physical or psychological trauma to the woman. And if the man complies with the verse, then he will not cause that type of harm to his wife.
@@kaizerell8777 dude, i am a muslim, sharia law doesn't allow a man to beat his wife, that judge is a hypocrite, domestic violence is something we are highly against and people get emprisonned for it, i would kindly ask you to stop judging by the news on how we are, and also don't judge by seeing most muslims in britain i have seen enough of em to say that they are fake.
@@kaizerell8777 sharia law says we follow the law of the land we live it so they should follow the british law but they chose to be radical and try to force their beliefs into a country that is not theirs, that's enough for me to safely say they are fake.
In Islam, Taqiya or Taqiyya (Arabic: تقیة taqiyyah, literally "prudence, fear")is a precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief and practice in the face of persecution.Another term for this concept, kitmān (lit. "action of covering, dissimulation"), has a more specific meaning of dissimulation by silence or omission.
@@JustaSimpleComplexSyrian Clearly you are not a knowledgeable Muslim or you are the one lying following Taqiya. Quran reference Sura 3:28. What I have said is true.
@@justbreathe4442 Let not believers take disbelievers as allies [i.e., supporters or protectors] rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing [i.e., no association] with Allāh, except when taking precaution against them in prudence.1 And Allāh warns you of Himself, and to Allāh is the [final] destination.
@@justbreathe4442 alright so whats your point? Taqiyyah is just a word used in the Qura'an it is not some sort of practice or obligation, God has allowed Muslims to avoid greater danger by allying with other disbelievers, and in fact prophet mohammed predicted that the Muslims and the Christians will unite at the end of the times to fight a mutual enemy, then they will turn against each other after finishing off the mutual enemy.. how is that linked to being knowledgeable ? Taqiyyah is a word.. what is your point?
Christians are supposed to have their own courts too... Whether we agree with Sharia Law or not, strong religious communities have their own laws, and intrinsically have the right to judge among themselves.
+Pastor JC Do you know that according to shariah law a muslim is entitled to sexually enslave non muslim women that he captured? Do you think we should STILL keep the shariah law under the clock of political correctness? You have no idea how vile these laws are. according to shariah law, if you choose not to believe in god, you are to be executed, and there's more.
Guy T I am familiar with Sharia... and in the West, whatever decisions they make must be under the watchful eye of the magistrates of the land. You should lecture THEM about the dangers, not me. On the other hand, if a particular group of whatever philosophy want to judge themselves as far as it does not violate the laws of the land- then they are free to do so, especially when it comes to religious matters.
+Pastor JC Well, they should not have the right to 'judge among themselves'. One law for all. Laws of the land that can change and move with the times. Laws that allow criticism without fear. The moment a law is defined as 'God's' law believers are afraid to question it even if they know in their hearts that they have not had justice.
+Pastor JC ...but you must also understand then that Muslims do not put any countries' laws above Shariah. In other words, they will invariably 'violate the laws of the land'. And, by the way, Shariah is entirely a 'religious matter' regardless of the case.
I’m trippin out on all the comments on here. Regardless of religion or race, no man has a right to beat his wife/girlfriend! Women are not owned by men and should not be treated like children.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. What kind of a man would beat his own wife.... Sickening....
Islam alows men to beat women, equally Islam does limit or state the strength of the beatings. That is a gray area, so one can imagine in the heat of an argument what can happen
I've been to his lectures... all these statements are out of context. Also notice how the video cuts so often during the interview showing one side of the arguement.
Perhaps... I don't support the beating of women btw. I am just saying that I have heard him answer questions like these differently to how it is portrayed in this video. The video is unfair and exagerated is all. Besides there should be no reason to beat a women based on my understanding of the Quran and many scholarly interpretations of it.
Asif Khan Really, Asif Khan? You don't support wife beating? Then how do you interpret (or to be more accurate pretend to interpret) Quranic injunctions like Surat Al Nisa (4:34): "Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret what Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High Exalted, Great." (Pickthall)? Or a Hadith like this: Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 11, Number 2142: Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab: "The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife."? I think your favourite Sheikh in this video was explaining this very Hadith at some point! Asif Khan, nobody gives a damn what you "think" about wife beating. You are not the prophet of Islam. The man that was the prophet of Islam has already said plainly and clearly both in his Ahadith and in the Quran that a man is allowed to beat his wife and nobody should even ask him why he beat her. The husband has divine sanction to do do so! It was said plainly and very easy to understand. There are many more Ahadith that even narrate how muslim women who had been beaten black and blue came to Muhammed to complain about their violent husbands and seek justice and every time he turned them away and took their husband's side. There is NOTHING ambiguous left there awaiting your "interpretation"!! Now on what basis you and the so-called moderate "muslims" read these Ahadith and verses and pretend that Islam doesn't allow wife beating? If you disagree with Muhammed as I do and any civilised human being on this earth would do then stop pretending that he didn't say what he clearly and repeatedly said and didn't mean what he clearly meant and accept that he was not a prophet but a brutal man and a product of his violent and barbaric times and has nothing to offer a 21st century civilised person like you and me and leave this nightmare of a "religion"! Stop whitewashing and re-writing this rubbish!
Hi. My opinion is that you may have copied and pasted quotes out of context and cherry picked a translation that suits your arguement. The quran is not something that is easily translated hence why it still exists in its original arabic. At no point do I claim I am the prophet of Islam, niether do I force the religion upon you or cause you any hardship. Please watch this short video to help you understand an alternate interpretation of Surat Al Nisa 4:34. /watch?v=n2sZrrXeMZo
Indeed I mean how can a dude just raise a hand on a woman who just planned to share her life with him.... Well whenever my girl pisses me off I just bite her instead 😅
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) enjoined kind treatment and honouring of one’s wife, and he described the best of people as those who are best to their wives. He said: “The best of you are those who are the best to their wives, and I am the best of you to my wives.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 3895; Ibn Maajah, 1977; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
The Greatest Deceiver Quran Surah 3:54: The greatest Deceiver (Makara) of them all is Allah. Beating Wives Quran Surah 4:34: Men are the managers of the affairs of women … those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.
Please read this compleatly I am sorry for taking your valuable time, ,I wanted to say that this controversial verse is often misinterpreted even by muslims, Muslim man use this verse to abuse their wives . In verse 4:34,the arabic word used for to beat them lightly is "darba"(idhriboona) ,This word have varient meanings like to to heal, strike, propound as an example, put forth a parable, go, make a journey, travel, mix, avoid, take away, put a cover, shut, mention/declare/state, propound, set forth, compare, liken, seek a way, march on, set, impose, prevent, fight, traffic with anyone's property for a share in the profit, he made or caused to be or constituted, leave/forsake, take away thing (with 'an). Depressed ground Etc 4:34 Remove Default Translation: Abdel Haleem Change font to indopak 4 : 34   Learn ٱلرِّجَالُ قَوَّٰمُونَ عَلَى ٱلنِّسَآءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ ٱللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَىٰ بَعْضٍ وَبِمَآ أَنفَقُوا۟ مِنْ أَمْوَٰلِهِمْ ۚ فَٱلصَّٰلِحَٰتُ قَٰنِتَٰتٌ حَٰفِظَٰتٌ لِّلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ ٱللَّهُ ۚ وَٱلَّٰتِى تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَٱهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِى ٱلْمَضَاجِعِ وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ ۖ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا۟ عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا Men should take good care of their women with* [the bounties] God has given to some more than others and with what they spend out of their own money. Righteous wives are devout and guard what God would have them guard in their husbands’ absence. If you fear high-handedness* from your wives, remind them [of the teachings of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them.* If they obey you, you have no right to act against them: God is most high and great.(This is the complete verse) Quran talked about a gradual way to settle the issue , And now look at verse 4:35 " If you [believers] fear that a couple may break up, appoint one arbiter from his family and one from hers. Then, if the couple want to put things right, God will bring about a reconciliation between them: He is all knowing, all aware" The quran is a text which should be intertextually So My conclusion is this word says to as the last resort leave them and discuss the issue Even within this same chapter darba used with meaning of to leave Please check 4:94,4:101 I agree with the fact that muslim men often appropriate religion and Quran to oppress their equal halves
@Anti-Islam - I draw Muhamad everyday you haven't read my comment completely , I don't have the energy to talk with you now , thank you 😊 if you are a believer from any faith , pray for my health
thats how all reporters and journalist make a living, giving false and sensationalised opinion to attract attention, then again you shouldn't judge a man on a 7 min clip which from the 1st minute was trying to portray islam has a negative treatment towards women, all muslims know that is not the case, the problem is the view there giving out on other people which may cause them to have a certain opinion on islam
Muslims are simply following what Quran says 4:34 Men are in charge of women by what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - advise them, forsake them in bed; and strike them. But if they obey you, seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
A woman's testimony under Shar'ia is worth half as that of a man. Sahih al-Bukhari, Witnesses Book 52, Hadith 22 Narrated 'Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: The Prophet (pbuh) said, "Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?" The women said, "Yes." He said, "This is because of the deficiency of a woman's mind." Surat Al-Baqarah, Ayat 282 O you who have believed, when you contract a debt for a specified term, write it down. And let a scribe write [it] between you in justice. Let no scribe refuse to write as Allah has taught him. So let him write and let the one who has the obligation dictate. And let him fear Allah, his Lord, and not leave anything out of it. But if the one who has the obligation is of limited understanding or weak or unable to dictate himself, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And bring to witness two witnesses from among your men. And if there are not two men [available], then a man and two women from those whom you accept as witnesses - so that if one of the women errs, then the other can remind her. And let not the witnesses refuse when they are called upon. And do not be [too] weary to write it, whether it is small or large, for its [specified] term. That is more just in the sight of Allah and stronger as evidence and more likely to prevent doubt between you, except when it is an immediate transaction which you conduct among yourselves. For [then] there is no blame upon you if you do not write it. And take witnesses when you conclude a contract. Let no scribe be harmed or any witness. For if you do so, indeed, it is [grave] disobedience in you. And fear Allah . And Allah teaches you. And Allah is Knowing of all things. Ya ayyuha allatheena amanoo itha tadayantum bidaynin ila ajalin musamman faoktuboohu walyaktub baynakum katibun bial'adli wala ya/ba katibun an yaktuba kama 'allamahu Allahu falyaktub walyumlili allathee 'alayhi alhaqqu walyattaqi Allaha rabbahu wala yabkhas minhu shay-an fa-in kana allathee 'alayhi alhaqqu safeehan aw da'eefan aw la yastatee'u an yumilla huwa falyumlil waliyyuhu bial'adli waistashhidoo shaheedayni min rijalikum fa-in lam yakoona rajulayni farajulun waimraatani mimman tardawna mina alshshuhada-i an tadilla ihdahuma fatuthakkira ihdahuma al-okhra wala ya/ba alshshuhadao itha ma du'oo wala tas-amoo an taktuboohu sagheeran aw kabeeran ila ajalihi thalikum aqsatu 'inda Allahi waaqwamu lilshshahadati waadna alla tartaboo illa an takoona tijaratan hadiratan tudeeroonaha baynakum falaysa 'alaykum junahun alla taktubooha waashhidoo itha tabaya'tum wala yudarra katibun wala shaheedun wa-in taf'aloo fa-innahu fusooqun bikum waittaqoo Allaha wayu'allimukumu Allahu waAllahu bikulli shay-in 'aleemun يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ إِذَا تَدَايَنتُم بِدَيْنٍ إِلَى أَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى فَاكْتُبُوهُ وَلْيَكْتُب بَّيْنَكُمْ كَاتِبٌ بِالْعَدْلِ وَلاَ يَأْبَ كَاتِبٌ أَنْ يَكْتُبَ كَمَا عَلَّمَهُ اللّهُ فَلْيَكْتُبْ وَلْيُمْلِلِ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ الْحَقُّ وَلْيَتَّقِ اللّهَ رَبَّهُ وَلاَ يَبْخَسْ مِنْهُ شَيْئاً فَإن كَانَ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ الْحَقُّ سَفِيهاً أَوْ ضَعِيفاً أَوْ لاَ يَسْتَطِيعُ أَن يُمِلَّ هُوَ فَلْيُمْلِلْ وَلِيُّهُ بِالْعَدْلِ وَاسْتَشْهِدُواْ شَهِيدَيْنِ من رِّجَالِكُمْ فَإِن لَّمْ يَكُونَا رَجُلَيْنِ فَرَجُلٌ وَامْرَأَتَانِ مِمَّن تَرْضَوْنَ مِنَ الشُّهَدَاء أَن تَضِلَّ إْحْدَاهُمَا فَتُذَكِّرَ إِحْدَاهُمَا الأُخْرَى وَلاَ يَأْبَ الشُّهَدَاء إِذَا مَا دُعُواْ وَلاَ تَسْأَمُوْاْ أَن تَكْتُبُوْهُ صَغِيراً أَو كَبِيراً إِلَى أَجَلِهِ ذَلِكُمْ أَقْسَطُ عِندَ اللّهِ وَأَقْومُ لِلشَّهَادَةِ وَأَدْنَى أَلاَّ تَرْتَابُواْ إِلاَّ أَن تَكُونَ تِجَارَةً حَاضِرَةً تُدِيرُونَهَا بَيْنَكُمْ فَلَيْسَ عَلَيْكُمْ جُنَاحٌ أَلاَّ تَكْتُبُوهَا وَأَشْهِدُوْاْ إِذَا تَبَايَعْتُمْ وَلاَ يُضَآرَّ كَاتِبٌ وَلاَ شَهِيدٌ وَإِن تَفْعَلُواْ فَإِنَّهُ فُسُوقٌ بِكُمْ وَاتَّقُواْ اللّهَ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمُ اللّهُ وَاللّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمٌ and for a good measure Sunan Abu Dawood, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah) Book 12, Hadith 102 Narrated 'Umar ibn al-Khattab: The Prophet (pbuh) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.
Beating wife is strongly prohibited in islam, but some muslim men misuse Qoran and say that Allah allowed men to beat their wives. The thing is the word 'Daraba' which is, unfortunately, mostly translated as 'beat', 'hit' or 'strike'. The translation of that word is not unique, it can also mean 'discourage', 'apart from'...IF A MAN WAS ALLOWED TO BEAT HIS WIFE IN ISLAM THEN MOHAMMED S.A.W.S. WOULD HAVE BEATEN SOME OF HIS WIVES. HE NEVER EVEN HIT AN ANIMAL.
Does Sharia Law allow a husband to beat his wife? This is the WRONG question! *If certain conditions are met, Shariah Law COMMANDS a husband to beat his wife* ! In Quran 4:34, we read: "Men are caretakers of women, since Allah has made some of them excel the others, and because of the wealth they have spent. So, the righteous women are obedient, (and) guard (the property and honor of their husbands) in (their) absence with the protection given by Allah. As for women of whom you fear rebellion, convince them, and leave them apart in beds, AND BEAT THEM."
The type of beating allowed in islam is done in every house hold and nobody even notices its like beating with a handerchief or a miswak (toothbrush) this is the allowed part which mostly people will do this even when therse no reason for it (if you think beating means slapping and other stuff thats not it at all. Islam prohibits parents from slapping their indisciplined children and yet we have “21ST CENTURY SCHOLARS IN THE COMMENT SECTION “ who dont even know the meaning are ranting about it The beating (with a toothbrushor something similar) is allowed only in severe case that is when a wife is emotionally unstable and is trying to commit suicide or something of that sort (disobediance here doesnt mean she not cooking good for the guy or any of that sort or not serving his parents ( in islam a woman isnt responsible for serving her husbands parents )disobediance as i said of something which requires action like i mentioned earlier ) as for a women in that moment of anger when the husband is behaving in such a way its not the solution in the heat of the moment if a woman beats her husband that guy might return it as physically whatever you might say about this the man in majority cases and mostly all cases is physically stronger (people saying let the wife beat him while he is sleeping thats not even allowed for husband to do ) In short in islam it is only allowed for a man to beat her wife lightly ( seriously dont know why i am even calling it beating ) only during the heat of the moment to bring her back to the senses like “when someone is dreaming we give them a shake to make them conscious ) but unfortunately this thing is common for every household where spouses do that to each other in normal times in means of teasing them but imagine both the sides are in severe anger or moment of heat and a women if she tries doing the same beating she might get a backlash thats the only reason. Read this : If a woman rebels against her husband and disobeys his commands, then he should follow this method of admonishing her, forsaking her in bed and hitting her. Hitting is subject to the condition that it should not be harsh or cause injury. Al-Hasan al-Basri said: this means that it should not cause pain. ‘Ata’ said: I said to Ibn ‘Abbaas, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, Hitting with a siwaak and the like. [A siwaak is a small stick or twig used for cleaning the teeth - Translator]
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
The question is why are Sharia courts even there in Britain?
Yep. There should be no religious laws. Democratic countries will be in danger as long as there r extreme religious laws r allowed
because muslims exist in britain
@@syladinstormlight8650 are you egyptian
@@Reuel-Jazwa are Christians courts in Islam countries? Is there freedom of religion?
****Muslims are evil**** ‼️
I want someone to ask him "can a woman strike her husband" and see what he says
@Persy Person not relevant. It's the principle
He will say no 💀
Yes- that would be ok...
I love skinny women only
@@jesusexposed1848 ok? bit random
Any religious law has no place dictating modern society. Especially in progressive societies
This.
Ola ho uber
It needs shutting down.....why is this evan allowed in Britain.????
Women enjoy being protected by a strong man, not beaten up by a strong man
👏👏👏
But do men enjoy getting beaten up by a strong women? ;)
Men don’t beat women for no reason. Unless drunken he was not. What did Sarah do?
@@shyland4534 Tell that to the court
@@shyland4534 what about men, when are they thrashed for ??
UK allow this???
Unbelievable.
ikr I'm British and I think this is disgusting. It's wrong, sexist and racist. Racist because it's treating Muslim women different to all other women, simply because they're Muslim. It's not fair on them. I say "racist", though I know Islam's not a race.
Say goodbye to the UK, they allow Islam in the UK.
R u guys racist . We muslim have to respect religions ok. I want this to be clear the people that are terorist are not muslim. They are fakes bit can still be forgiven
S Wright r u even muslim
S Wright ik it is wrong to hurt anyone
The fella is nothin' more than a horrible controlling lair
lair?
Liar you mean
Sharia law should applied in ur country bro.They have world record for most forced conversion.
Why do Muslim want to have sharia courts in foreign country when there are local laws present. If u want Sharia court go back to the Islamic countries from where u came. If they don't want to go back then they have to follow the law of the land as simple as it gets.
Totally agree with you….this is now getting out of hand!!!!
He's a liar. His voice gets high when he's lying.
exactly, that's an obvious tell of a liar when they heighten their pitch.
watch out we got sound engineers/ sigmund freud here
I clocked that too lol. He's a charlatan. And those who follow that ideology and give him credence are complete and utter imbeciles
Another clue as to when he's lying is that he opens his mouth.
@@khalil-wc4bs Freud??? Random
If a man beat his wife should go to prison!!!
True!
We don't beat our wife
We know that patriarchal societies favor males and males have more power
But no society teaches to hit wives. And no religion except you know what allows it. Its pathetic 'cos religion means following a god's guidances.
How come a gd teaches to hit wives? Its pathetic.
"the word beat has different interpretations" he says. i hope someone interprets his skull in.
Yes it is
Mark Steven what ever are you talking about troll? If you want troll at leas be clear
Hitting woman thats messed up-ua-cam.com/video/1azySjz4edk/v-deo.html
123 145 ua-cam.com/video/ejx27AIgCuo/v-deo.html
Anybody can google the scholarly Islamic discussions onwife ebeating and see there indeed exists different interpretation mainly because the word has several meanings in Arabic but also the context of the use of the word is relevant. It's not a secret. There are opposing views and the role of culture can not be omitted when people seek to justify violence against women. But I think its best people seek the knowledge themselves.
The UK should be laying down the law on these courts, shut them down!
Now Labour are in, is it possible?
social services will get involved-heard of similar cases
The sharia court ought to be outlaw and when find operating charged accordingly
They were allowed as part of religious freedom. It would be better these courts are regulated such as WHO CAN BECOME a Sharia judge.
Hitting woman thats messed up-ua-cam.com/video/1azySjz4edk/v-deo.html
Sharia law what is it do your own research
Ola ho uber
@@786swe would islamic countries accept canon law in their countries?? don’t be hypocritical
where has gone my old england? england land of hope and glory, illegal sharia courts in england?? people of england you must react to this threat against basic human rights
Lol hope and glory huh... How cute
@@RAMIC-tv1ye do You think its 'cute' to abuse women?
@Simpsons LOL XD "the land of hope and glory", it's the name of a famous patriotic song, you knew that of course...
I'm sure the Moslem religion has to abide by the laws in England.
We have religions in the US that want to sacrifice animals. But, US laws says it's a crime. They can go to prison to or that plus fines.
Of course they still try secretly.
A man who condones wife beating is like someone who sets up a wrestling match between a heavy weight and a middle weight, there is little chance of a fair fight, yet he is routing for the bully, in fact putting money on him. This is his mentality. To think people look up to him is highly disturbing and unethical. He will be accountable for his actions.
What is written in the Quran is God's law so when we say beating a wife is unacceptable then we are going directly against Mohammed.
@@Greatsprit1 I am not afraid of Mohammed, even though he was okay with stealing, murder, slavery, pedophilia, wife beating, and all around thug ways. No, he was just a man, and not a very good one at that. Mohammed did not care about the things that really mattered, he was put in place by the Catholics who would not convert people in that region to their religion, so they had to make up one, that is why Mohammed married a nun, who does that? Do not fear a man, fear God, All That Is, for Mohammed does not care what you did in your life, God does.
@@jmallett6081 I agree with you 100%.
Ola ho uber
@@Greatsprit1 ola ho uber
Not acceptable, if a man beats his wife and has a restraining order the wife and children needs protection.If such laws are not blocked then shariah license will be revoked.
Problem is you fminized westeners only look on the beating but you don't ask for the reasons why a man hit his wife.
Like all abrahamic religions they will never be able to escape the roots of their medieval and backward origins. It is never ok to hit someone unless it is self defence. Woman have never enjoyed being seen as lesser. We are all human beings and deserve equal treatment in all matters. We largely have this in the west and should not be dragged backwards by the musings of ancient peoples.
+Liam Thoresen
Liam there are some issues with your reasoning, please clarify:
Democracy is older than most religions, should we abandon democracy as a backward ancient practice?
If a five year old child drowns her two year old sister, should we punish the five year old child like we would an adult?
In regards to your first point the democracy we use today is not the same as such was used by the ancient greeks for example. That would be impractical with our current population size. So even this is not the same as it once was. I did not mean to imply that we should abandon all that came before us. Simply that it is silly that we still use the same stories some of our ancestors used to define our own lives, which are vastly different from theirs.
In regards to your second point I am unsure where this is coming from. Of course the child is not punished in the same way. However some punishment may still be received depending on the variables. Was it by accident? Child's mental condition etc. However I am unsure how this relates to my points...
Liam Thoresen Thanks for the response, I appreciate your objective analysis.
I agree that some stories from the past are very specific to those people and circumstances. I would be silly to transpose one cultural narrative onto another.
However, we can benefit from some ancient concepts such as racial equality and religious pluralism. Muslim women are not inferior morally, legally, or politically (such positions aren't based in the religion).
Rather than being fossilized in the past, Islamic law is constantly renewed to fit well in new times and places - Islamic jurisprudence is dynamic. The fellow featured in the video happens to be an ultra-conservative litteralist, people of such persuasions always represent a tiny minority regarding religious though.
-
My second point was based on your statement:
"We are all human beings and deserve equal treatment in all matters."
My absurd example demonstrated that equal treatment for all people in all matters would yield unjust results, there has to be flexibility based on the specific circumstances for equity's sake.
Ah I understand your meaning now although the idea that we are all equal really refers to all human adults. No distinction should be made between them for race, class, gender etc. This of course does not mean children should not be treated with fairness, respect and equality because they should but I appreciate that in certain situations they are handled in a way more appropriate for a younger mind. My statement while still true should be looked at with nuance and not so literally. I would agree that we can often benefit from the ideas of our predecessors and in all honesty I have less problem with the idea of more progressive religious people than the more conservative as you say. However I would propose that the conservatives have a more true interpretation of the religion. I am also still skeptical of the idea of a religions own level of jurisprudence. Especially with such conservatives I find that the more objective and secular law of the land would be far more fair and balanced. Please do not mistake this as a hatred for religion/islam (I converse with Christians similiarly) but I detest the idea of people being treated as less than equals or unfairly.
"No distinction should be made between them for race, class, gender etc."
Agreed.
"My statement while still true should be looked at with nuance and not so literally."
Based on your other response, I got a feeling that such was your position, jolly good.
"However I would propose that the conservatives have a more true interpretation of the religion."
Actually, in the Islamic tradition there are many schools of legal thought, all considered equally valid in interpretation.
Conservatism/literalism has strong appeal in times of confusion and desperation, people always prefer decisiveness to nuance. The Muslim world is in such a state of chaos unfortunately. That being said, the followers of the conservative/literalist school of Islamic law, al-Hanbaliyah, account for only 2% of Muslims. They are heavily promoted by petro-dollars, so they seem to have more clout than they really do.
We consider diversity of opinion in legal matters as a blessing. This allows different cultures to adopt whichever way suits them best (the historical Islamic legal systems of Senegalese Muslims differed from Siberian Muslims, which differed from Malay Muslims etc.
The phenomenon of making a one size fits all sharia system, especially from a narrow cultural context and then exporting it to another is an absurd innovation which diverges from tradition of Islamic pluralism.
" I find that the more objective and secular law of the land would be far more fair and balanced."
Objectivity is the cornerstone of all legal systems, even religious ones. This is a key principle for establishing truth and implementing justice.
Secularism however, has some issues. Unlike objectivity which is a principle for establishing truth, secularism is an ideology (not a truth finding method). If a community doesn't subscribe to a certain ideology, would it be fair to impose it upon them by force?
"Please do not mistake this as a hatred for religion/islam (I converse with Christians similarly) but I detest the idea of people being treated as less than equals or unfairly."
Your objective evenhanded thinking is admirable, such conversations are beneficial to all involved. You also have my support in endorsing fairness and equality. Social justice is one of the key pillars which a Muslim should strive for.
"O believers! Stand firm for justice and bear true witness for the sake of God, even though it be against yourselves, your parents or your relatives. It does not matter whether the party is rich or poor - God is well wisher of both. So let not your selfish desires swerve you from justice. If you distort your testimony or decline to give it, then you should remember that God is fully aware of your actions." Quran 4:135
I like western law. I am a muslim but I dont want shariah law!
Yes queen raiise ur woman like queen too
And us westerners like you. We (non muslims and muslims alike) need to make sure sharia law doesn’t infiltrate our way of life.
Just leave islam and be a good person
Is this Islamic law allowed to override England’s laws as a nation ? I’m confused !!!
@@clayevins6795it shouldn’t be in our country full stop, but it is, go look up the Islamic law for yourself and then you can learn about it, it’s the opposite to our laws, then ask yourself why is it aloud and who allowed it
Why does british Government allow this nonsense,
Sharia law is not the law of UK.
Go to Muslim country if you will not abide by UK laws.
SHARIAH LAW SAYS THEY SHOULD FOLLOW LAW OF THE LAND...
No it doesnt!
@Althaf L S
Yes you are right can i speak with you about your view
I have a video on my channel , it explainning there is no beating of the woman in islam
@Althaf L S
واضربوهن, لا يوجد ضرب للمرأة في القرآن********
There is no beating of the woman in the Quaran watching the video for more explications.
ua-cam.com/video/_qiQM41vL8k/v-deo.html
واضربوهن, لا يوجد ضرب للمرأة في القرآن********
There is no beating of the woman in the Quaran watching the video for more explications.
ua-cam.com/video/_qiQM41vL8k/v-deo.html
And Quran allows wife beating.
Government should close this eivel places, only British law should be applied in Britain
SAME THING WITH AMERICA AND ALL EUROPEAN OR NON MUSLIM COUNTRIES. LOOK AT CHINA. THEY LINED UP SHOT ALL OF THEM, THAT SHOULD BE A LESSON
Close the bloody lot of them! Absolute disgrace that these buildings exist.
British law needs to prevail. One law for all is what the country needs. If people can't intergrate then why come to the UK?
Wait …. So the laws are allowed in England and over ride the laws of England ??? Wtf ??? Explain please ??
what good is government, if every group gets their own court? but then again what good is a court that merely serves the bank?
Sharia also states that you must obey the law of whatever land your in. So there should literally be no conflict. Or any need for a separate law.
C4 wouldn't dare report on things like this today. I wonder why...🤔
"The word beat has different interpretations"
What a disgusting thing to think!
I'm Irish and disgusted this is allowed in the UK. I lived in the UK for years, and I lived according to the rules and regulations in that Country. If they want to live in the UK, they should have to live by British law and regulations, if they don't want to, they can always go back to an Islamist Country. I blame 15 or more years of Tory Governments for this, the police have also ignore sharia law being applied on the streets of the UK, near their Mosques, where British people have been assaulted for improperly dressed or drinking. This is why you now have mayhem on the streets of Britain, in 2024. I fail to understand it, above all other Nationalities, including English, Muslims appear to be able to do as they please.
"Domestic violence is a broad thing"
"Beat can have different interpretations"
Me: Man u full of BSSS!!
Hitting woman thats messed up-ua-cam.com/video/1azySjz4edk/v-deo.html
Short answer: yes. There are Hadith that describe Muhhamed explicitly saying wife beating is permissible. There is also centuries of Sunni legal tradition of allowing wife-beating on that basis.
Tommy Robinson also talks about this and he is called racist go figure! lol
You shouldn't call yourself a scholar when you only read one book.
"..Many scientific studies" ? Notice how She didn't even bother to ask.. Ok, can show me this scientific studies?
A woman judge in the Muslim world 😂
Impossible
Muslim countries have female prime ministers so why not a judge? LOL
Bangladesh is a muslim majority country.
Pakistan is also Muslim majority country.
Pakistan had muslim PM in past.
Bangladesh has been ruling by woman for 25 years.
Bangladesh will celebrate 50 years anniversary in 2021.
Show me 1 country in west with 160 million people where they are ruled by woman for 25 years.
@@shafiqsha9875 Hey man I'm from BD as well, and yes you're right! And also I think you meant Pakistan had a FEMALE PM in past(Benazir Bhutto).
These courts should not be allowed. We should not be setting up a regulatory body. We should be closing them down. I am shocked that a sub culture is being allowed to operate. Also shocked that the safeguarding of the children was not put at the centre of this piece.
He'll no...shariah for UK and the west
They have no legal jurisdiction. So, it seems to me that Parliament needs to make it clear that they cannot operate as a pseudo-legal system.
they don't know how many sharia courts there is in Britain ? .. But then she says about 100 .. why don't we know how many there is ? .. everything else is accounted for
As a Muslim I believe this is wrong
The Quran clearly states that you should abide by the law in the land and should not implement Islam by force
So as a Muslim living in Britain I'm obligated by Islam to follow the British law and I wouldn't have it any other way
I believe that if these places were to remain open they should only advise and not have any power to do anything
.
Jay Umm Tay " The Qur’an clearly says, “There is no compulsion in religion” (2:257). Furthermore, Shariah obliges Muslims to be loyal to their nation of residence. Therefore, American Muslims must adhere to the US Constitution as the supreme law of the land." So the same applies to the UK
Hope that helps
@@Jf_1900 no it doesnt help at all because you have still not provided any references of the chapter and verse in the Quran which tells muslims they must obey the laws of the non muslim lands they live in. Because there are no references. So why are you lying?
@@PurePeacePower Sayyiduna Abd Allah ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said: “It is necessary upon a Muslim to listen to and obey the ruler, as long as one is not ordered to carry out a sin. If he is commanded to commit a sin, then there is no adherence and obedience.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2796 & Sunan Tirmidhi)
@@PurePeacePower All I can add is that there are many many misconceptions in the minds of people as they only listen to those who oppose and construe the message of Islam.
@@Jf_1900 thats a eeference to a Hadith not the Quran. If Allah has not commanded muslims in the Quran, then from where and from who do all these injunctions in Hadiths come from? Does Allah not say that the Quran is complete and there is no doubt in it? Then why all these Hadiths to try and explain?
if a persons does not pay taxes or hides them from the state is a crime. Why muslims can exercise law that is not legal and still be free? This is non-sense!
It’s called abuse for anyone can beat another person. I am a Muslim woman. This is unacceptable. Any abuse is unacceptable.
"Except we found a female judge" 👏
Did he actually say that some women scientifically enjoy this? Surely this is the extreme edge case, scientifically.
He is man with 2 faces. This is the reason we can't trust these type of person.
A man should never lay a hand on his wife.
How can this guy be even in a position to live in this country. You should send him where this guy came from
Short answer YES. Long Answer absolutely yes.
You're all good at judging other religion. Now pls explain this verse:
"Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves." (Numbers 31:17-18)
@Vladimir Putin Can you not see with your eyes?? IF THEY DO THAT THEY ARE NOT MUSLIM FULL STOP
Your right to quote that verse because since islam is a concoction of bible thora zoroastrian religions the final product being islam your counter attacks using christianity is just rationalising to justify all thats wrong with islam you in your quotes omit the fact that these religions have evolved whilst islam has stayed in the 7th century
This man is lying between his teeth.
and you believe media
They are trying to make him look like a scary preacher, he isn't scary or controversial at all...just cheap Channel 4 tactics.
True
He's scary for what he says. In another documentary he pretty much admitted apostates should be killed according to sharia.
Islam = fascism
Samuel Vimes that’s actually not true
The only system that doesn't follow the dictionary definition of facism is anarchy.
Right you sir need to wake up Jesus is the way!
Here is the opinion of a legit senior shariah scholar in Saudi Arabia about an abusive husband:
"It is *not permissible* for him to hit his wife in a way that *causes her to bleed or hurts* her... it is *permissible for her to ask for a divorce so as to relieve herself* of the harm this is befalling her, and *it is permissible for her to tell the police so that they can protect her against her husband's aggression* by making him promise not to beat her and threatening him with imprisonment if he does that." - Sh. Saleh Al-Munajjad (scholar in KSA)
Alllah knows best.
@@jigglybandito9505Muhammed married a child and murdered Jews. Allah doesn't know best
Can the wife beat the husband so he doesn't bleed or get hurt?
Let me see people shouldn’t question a man hitting his wife, what about if the woman takes revenge on the husband what happens.. it’s very convenient. He’s clearly dodging the hard questions - coinciding with the treble in his voice and increased pitch.. classic signs of lying
Yes it does sadly. 🙃 Sharia courts should not be in the UK. Islams goes against every grain of western progression. ✌
sean love sharia goes against it not islam
Hamzah Saleh, Sharia is Islam..
Shaykh Haitham Al Haddad is amazing :) even with these well edited interviews, and out of context misquotations.
+Atheist Lehman ...and the edited interview gave a bit more context to that cherry picked statement. He basically then said that the woman should report it should she choose to do so.
"The word beat has different interpretations.." *EDIT* (context withheld again)
Don't you *EDIT* see the *EDIT* blatant *EDIT* misrepresentation going *EDIT* *EDIT* *EDIT* *EDIT* *EDIT* on *EDIT* *EDIT*.
I don't agree with him on everything, but you can see he's context is edited out
*EDIT*
jagoman85, Actually, he quoted the Sunnah:
Abu Dawud (2142) - "The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife."
And also:
“It was narrated that Ash'ath bin Qais said: "I was a guest (at the home) of 'Umar one night, and in the middle of the night he went and hit his wife, and I separated them. When he went to bed he said to me: 'O Ash'ath, learn from me something that I heard from the Messenger of Allah" A man should not be asked why he beats his wife, and do not go to sleep until you have prayed the Witr."' And I forgot the third thing."
Sunan Ibn Majah 3:9:1986
Also
1. You no references.
2. You gave no context.
You haven’t given any support to your argument.
@@Mayahomok What kind of drawings is that?
Ola ho uber
@Ak Proof Islam promotes equality:
“The most complete believer in faith is the best in morals, and the best among you is the best to their wives.” (Tirmidhi)
“And among God’s signs is this: He created for you mates from amongst yourselves (males […] for females and vice versa) that you might find tranquility and peace in them. And he has put love and kindness among you. Herein surely are signs for those who reflect.” (Qur’an, 30: 21)
“They (your wives) are your garment and you are a garment for them.” (Qur’an, 2: 187)
“O Messenger of Allah! Who is most deserving of my fine treatment?” He said, “Your mother, then your mother, then your mother, then your father, then your nearest, then nearest.” (Narrated by Abu Hurairah - Bukhari and Muslim)
“Observe your duty to Allah in respect to the women, and treat them well.” (Prophet Muhammed’s Last Sermon)
“I went to the Apostle of Allah (PBUH) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.” (Narrated by Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri - Abu Dawud)
“Verily, women are the twin halves of men.” (Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi)
“Their Lord responded to them: “I never fail to reward any worker among you for any work you do, be you male or female - you are equal to one another.” (Qur’an, 3: 195)
“The believers, men and women, are helpers, supporters, friends and protectors of one another, they enjoin all that is good, and forbid all that is evil, they offer their prayers perfectly, and give Zakah (obligatory charity) and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah will bestow Mercy on them. Surely Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.” (Qur’an, 9: 71)
This is one scary dude
They should follow British laws otherwise how is that equality?
Want to follow the laws between your foot...
Verse 4:34 literally says a woman must obey her husband or she can be beaten.. so yes.
The prophet Mohammed's wife (peace be upon him) said:“Never did the Messenger of Allah ﷺ strike anyone with his hand, neither a servant nor a woman, unless he was fighting in the cause of Allah. He never took revenge upon anyone for the wrong done to him, and would [only] carry out legal retributions for the sake of Allah when the injunctions of Allah were violated.”
Reference: Muslim (644)
There is no ambiguity in the matter, our prophet Mohammed never hit his woman, and we muslims are ordered to emulate the prophet. Please, my dear non muslim viewers, do not think our religion orders us to beat our woman folk, this is far from the truth.
Your phophet Muhammad was a pedophile though....not gonna lie ...Aisha was pretty young..i mean...you know.. Pedophilia...
If you are not allowed to beat your wife can you remove the wife beating verse from the Quran.
@@musqul8566 There is no wife beating verse in the way you are interpreting it. The verse you are referring to speaks about when a woman is rebellious against her husband, that he is able to "strike" her with a miswak (a tooth brush that was used back in the day and till this day aswell). The commentary of that verse states that it cannot be on the face, or leave a mark on the body nor can the arm be raised above the shoulder. It is a symbolic "strike" not designed to cause physical pain to the woman.
@@a.Bader97 what is symbolic strike. We are talking about displining someone who rebelled. And what is rebellion? Disobeying the husband? Striking someone with a toothbrush is not disciplining them. It will infuriate them further. Allah with all his wisdom couldn't come up with a better solution for husband wife quarel? Did he consider the fact that the woman might hurt the man in his sleep to revenge for his 'disciplining'. Did he also consider the physical harm it can cause, the psychological harm, humiliation, trauma, how it will affect the children. If I ever see my dad raise his hand to my mom it will be the last time he raises a hand. Did Allah consider that?
@@musqul8566 Why have you assumed its a form of disciplined in the traditional sense? did my clarification not prove to you that the husband has not been ordered to cause pain to his wife if she rebels against him. You claim it will infuriate them further. Absolutely not- it wil have the opposite effect. If a woman continues to rebel against her husband and he decides to exercise the striking in the way mentioned, it will only help diffuse the situation as the woman the man decided to exercise a physical reaction in a very limited way. The woman will see that despite the anger/frustration of the man, he was viligant and disclipined enough in getting his message across without hurting his wife. It is also beneficial to read the whole verse which many people (like you) have not done:
Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
You're speculation about woman getting revenge in the night is nonsensical. You are speaking in uncertainty and questioning God as to why he didn't consider your mere speculation. Speculation is useless- we deal with evidence. You've made a very weak point.
Lastly i told you there is no physical harm caused to the woman. This verse applies in very niche circumstances. Read the verse and you can see. Since there is no physical harm, why are you then saying there may physical and psychological harm/trauma. Stop attempting to predict scenarios that are completely opposite to the nature of the verse. The verse does not intend for a man to cause physical or psychological trauma to the woman. And if the man complies with the verse, then he will not cause that type of harm to his wife.
The answer is yes. That’s the problem
Its pretty disrespectful for these muslims to spread their practices in other countries
No
@@mjama2132 no one goes to the middle east to promote Christianity so they should do the same
Thanks no Sharia Law in the Philippine court ;)
I'm happy for this fact too! 😁
the answer is yes it does
I have to politely interfere and say no
An inspiring animator doesn't it because I'm not sure?
@@kaizerell8777 dude, i am a muslim, sharia law doesn't allow a man to beat his wife, that judge is a hypocrite, domestic violence is something we are highly against and people get emprisonned for it, i would kindly ask you to stop judging by the news on how we are, and also don't judge by seeing most muslims in britain i have seen enough of em to say that they are fake.
@@kaizerell8777 sharia law says we follow the law of the land we live it so they should follow the british law but they chose to be radical and try to force their beliefs into a country that is not theirs, that's enough for me to safely say they are fake.
An inspiring animator okay thank you
This guy is Allah's gift to Muslim men. Any Muslim man that beats his wife is going to bring their case to this guy.
In Islam, Taqiya or Taqiyya (Arabic: تقیة taqiyyah, literally "prudence, fear")is a precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief and practice in the face of persecution.Another term for this concept, kitmān (lit. "action of covering, dissimulation"), has a more specific meaning of dissimulation by silence or omission.
Lol im muslim and never heard of this
stop lying
@@JustaSimpleComplexSyrian Clearly you are not a knowledgeable Muslim or you are the one lying following Taqiya. Quran reference Sura 3:28. What I have said is true.
@@justbreathe4442 Let not believers take disbelievers as allies [i.e., supporters or protectors] rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing [i.e., no association] with Allāh, except when taking precaution against them in prudence.1 And Allāh warns you of Himself, and to Allāh is the [final] destination.
@@justbreathe4442 alright so whats your point? Taqiyyah is just a word used in the Qura'an it is not some sort of practice or obligation, God has allowed Muslims to avoid greater danger by allying with other disbelievers, and in fact prophet mohammed predicted that the Muslims and the Christians will unite at the end of the times to fight a mutual enemy, then they will turn against each other after finishing off the mutual enemy..
how is that linked to being knowledgeable ? Taqiyyah is a word.. what is your point?
the taqqiya you mentioned is only prevalent among the rawafidh. ahlul sunnah only do ''taqqiya'' when our life is in danger
Britain! What have you done 😢 Who allowed this?
Christians are supposed to have their own courts too... Whether we agree with Sharia Law or not, strong religious communities have their own laws, and intrinsically have the right to judge among themselves.
+Pastor JC Do you know that according to shariah law a muslim is entitled to sexually enslave non muslim women that he captured?
Do you think we should STILL keep the shariah law under the clock of political correctness?
You have no idea how vile these laws are.
according to shariah law, if you choose not to believe in god, you are to be executed, and there's more.
Guy T
I am familiar with Sharia... and in the West, whatever decisions they make must be under the watchful eye of the magistrates of the land. You should lecture THEM about the dangers, not me. On the other hand, if a particular group of whatever philosophy want to judge themselves as far as it does not violate the laws of the land- then they are free to do so, especially when it comes to religious matters.
+Pastor JC Well, they should not have the right to 'judge among themselves'. One law for all. Laws of the land that can change and move with the times. Laws that allow criticism without fear. The moment a law is defined as 'God's' law believers are afraid to question it even if they know in their hearts that they have not had justice.
+Pastor JC ...but you must also understand then that Muslims do not put any countries' laws above Shariah. In other words, they will invariably 'violate the laws of the land'. And, by the way, Shariah is entirely a 'religious matter' regardless of the case.
That is NOT true... Taqqiya... Muslims do not put Sharia Law above Secular Law UNTIL they overwhelm a country and convert it to Islam.
I’m trippin out on all the comments on here. Regardless of religion or race, no man has a right to beat his wife/girlfriend! Women are not owned by men and should not be treated like children.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
What kind of a man would beat his own wife.... Sickening....
How come the police can beat the wife of a man then?
Islam alows men to beat women, equally Islam does limit or state the strength of the beatings. That is a gray area, so one can imagine in the heat of an argument what can happen
this video makes me laugh ,why don't you tell him he is a joke ..you just sit and appease him
"O you who believe! You are forbidden
to inherit women against their will.
Nor should you treat them with harshness..." (4:19)
I've been to his lectures... all these statements are out of context. Also notice how the video cuts so often during the interview showing one side of the arguement.
Asif Khan he seemed like he was avoiding the questions to me, I don't know
Perhaps... I don't support the beating of women btw. I am just saying that I have heard him answer questions like these differently to how it is portrayed in this video. The video is unfair and exagerated is all. Besides there should be no reason to beat a women based on my understanding of the Quran and many scholarly interpretations of it.
Asif Khan Ah ok. I wasn't judging him or anything, was just curious
Asif Khan Really, Asif Khan? You don't support wife beating? Then how do you interpret (or to be more accurate pretend to interpret) Quranic injunctions like Surat Al Nisa (4:34):
"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret what Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High Exalted, Great." (Pickthall)?
Or a Hadith like this: Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 11, Number 2142:
Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab:
"The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife."?
I think your favourite Sheikh in this video was explaining this very Hadith at some point!
Asif Khan, nobody gives a damn what you "think" about wife beating. You are not the prophet of Islam. The man that was the prophet of Islam has already said plainly and clearly both in his Ahadith and in the Quran that a man is allowed to beat his wife and nobody should even ask him why he beat her. The husband has divine sanction to do do so! It was said plainly and very easy to understand. There are many more Ahadith that even narrate how muslim women who had been beaten black and blue came to Muhammed to complain about their violent husbands and seek justice and every time he turned them away and took their husband's side. There is NOTHING ambiguous left there awaiting your "interpretation"!!
Now on what basis you and the so-called moderate "muslims" read these Ahadith and verses and pretend that Islam doesn't allow wife beating? If you disagree with Muhammed as I do and any civilised human being on this earth would do then stop pretending that he didn't say what he clearly and repeatedly said and didn't mean what he clearly meant and accept that he was not a prophet but a brutal man and a product of his violent and barbaric times and has nothing to offer a 21st century civilised person like you and me and leave this nightmare of a "religion"! Stop whitewashing and re-writing this rubbish!
Hi.
My opinion is that you may have copied and pasted quotes out of context and cherry picked a translation that suits your arguement.
The quran is not something that is easily translated hence why it still exists in its original arabic.
At no point do I claim I am the prophet of Islam, niether do I force the religion upon you or cause you any hardship.
Please watch this short video to help you understand an alternate interpretation of Surat Al Nisa 4:34.
/watch?v=n2sZrrXeMZo
These people are backwards
No
Makes me laugh,they do as they like as the police are too scared to say anything, our police force have been gelded.
Yea because it's "Police Service" now!
you should never EVER beat your wife or husband
Indeed I mean how can a dude just raise a hand on a woman who just planned to share her life with him.... Well whenever my girl pisses me off I just bite her instead 😅
no man should ever beat women our prophet did not and neither should you
Beating is different than just discipling.
He did he beat hazrat ayesha RA for leaving the house without his permission
@@mariamalavi2976 He didn't beat her, a poke or shove to the chest is not a beating you fool
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) enjoined kind treatment and honouring of one’s wife, and he described the best of
people as those who are best to their wives. He said: “The best of you
are those who are the best to their wives, and I am the best of you to my
wives.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 3895; Ibn Maajah, 1977; classed as
saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
🥓🥓🥓🕋🥓🥓🥓
@@banksy8081 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕.
Islamic definition of best is different
Your prophet specifically said women are less intelligent than men!!! Read your own books!!!
The Greatest Deceiver
Quran Surah 3:54: The greatest Deceiver (Makara) of them all is Allah.
Beating Wives
Quran Surah 4:34: Men are the managers of the affairs of women … those you fear
may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.
Please read this compleatly
I am sorry for taking your valuable time,
,I wanted to say that this controversial verse is often misinterpreted even by muslims, Muslim man use this verse to abuse their wives .
In verse 4:34,the arabic word used for to beat them lightly is "darba"(idhriboona) ,This word have varient meanings like to to heal, strike, propound as an example, put forth a parable, go, make a journey, travel, mix, avoid, take away, put a cover, shut, mention/declare/state, propound, set forth, compare, liken, seek a way, march on, set, impose, prevent, fight, traffic with anyone's property for a share in the profit, he made or caused to be or constituted, leave/forsake, take away thing (with 'an).
Depressed ground Etc
4:34
Remove Default Translation: Abdel Haleem
Change font to indopak
4 : 34   Learn
ٱلرِّجَالُ قَوَّٰمُونَ عَلَى ٱلنِّسَآءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ ٱللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَىٰ بَعْضٍ وَبِمَآ أَنفَقُوا۟ مِنْ أَمْوَٰلِهِمْ ۚ فَٱلصَّٰلِحَٰتُ قَٰنِتَٰتٌ حَٰفِظَٰتٌ لِّلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ ٱللَّهُ ۚ وَٱلَّٰتِى تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَٱهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِى ٱلْمَضَاجِعِ وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ ۖ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا۟ عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا
Men should take good care of their women with* [the bounties] God has given to some more than others and with what they spend out of their own money. Righteous wives are devout and guard what God would have them guard in their husbands’ absence. If you fear high-handedness* from your wives, remind them [of the teachings of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them.* If they obey you, you have no right to act against them: God is most high and great.(This is the complete verse)
Quran talked about a gradual way to settle the issue ,
And now look at verse 4:35
"
If you [believers] fear that a couple may break up, appoint one arbiter from his family and one from hers. Then, if the couple want to put things right, God will bring about a reconciliation between them: He is all knowing, all aware"
The quran is a text which should be intertextually
So My conclusion is this word says to as the last resort leave them and discuss the issue
Even within this same chapter darba used with meaning of to leave
Please check 4:94,4:101
I agree with the fact that muslim men often appropriate religion and Quran to oppress their equal halves
@Anti-Islam - I draw Muhamad everyday you haven't read my comment completely , I don't have the energy to talk with you now , thank you 😊 if you are a believer from any faith , pray for my health
he's messed up, point blank it's not okay .
sad that you nitpicked short sections of clips to make Shaykh Haitham look bad.
thats how all reporters and journalist make a living, giving false and sensationalised opinion to attract attention, then again you shouldn't judge a man on a 7 min clip which from the 1st minute was trying to portray islam has a negative treatment towards women, all muslims know that is not the case, the problem is the view there giving out on other people which may cause them to have a certain opinion on islam
yeah he doesn't need help to look bad
Live like this is so beyond me ?? In 2024. 😂
4:15
Wow really ?
Cause this is the first time I heard about this. Maybe we south east asians didn't get the memo or something.
Muslims are simply following what Quran says 4:34 Men are in charge of women by what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance - advise them, forsake them in bed; and strike them. But if they obey you, seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
Welcome to the most destroying cult...
A woman's testimony under Shar'ia is worth half as that of a man.
Sahih al-Bukhari, Witnesses
Book 52, Hadith 22
Narrated 'Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
The Prophet (pbuh) said, "Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?" The women said, "Yes." He said, "This is because of the deficiency of a woman's mind."
Surat Al-Baqarah, Ayat 282
O you who have believed, when you contract a debt for a specified term, write it down. And let a scribe write [it] between you in justice. Let no scribe refuse to write as Allah has taught him. So let him write and let the one who has the obligation dictate. And let him fear Allah, his Lord, and not leave anything out of it. But if the one who has the obligation is of limited understanding or weak or unable to dictate himself, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And bring to witness two witnesses from among your men. And if there are not two men [available], then a man and two women from those whom you accept as witnesses - so that if one of the women errs, then the other can remind her. And let not the witnesses refuse when they are called upon. And do not be [too] weary to write it, whether it is small or large, for its [specified] term. That is more just in the sight of Allah and stronger as evidence and more likely to prevent doubt between you, except when it is an immediate transaction which you conduct among yourselves. For [then] there is no blame upon you if you do not write it. And take witnesses when you conclude a contract. Let no scribe be harmed or any witness. For if you do so, indeed, it is [grave] disobedience in you. And fear Allah . And Allah teaches you. And Allah is Knowing of all things.
Ya ayyuha allatheena amanoo itha tadayantum bidaynin ila ajalin musamman faoktuboohu walyaktub baynakum katibun bial'adli wala ya/ba katibun an yaktuba kama 'allamahu Allahu falyaktub walyumlili allathee 'alayhi alhaqqu walyattaqi Allaha rabbahu wala yabkhas minhu shay-an fa-in kana allathee 'alayhi alhaqqu safeehan aw da'eefan aw la yastatee'u an yumilla huwa falyumlil waliyyuhu bial'adli waistashhidoo shaheedayni min rijalikum fa-in lam yakoona rajulayni farajulun waimraatani mimman tardawna mina alshshuhada-i an tadilla ihdahuma fatuthakkira ihdahuma al-okhra wala ya/ba alshshuhadao itha ma du'oo wala tas-amoo an taktuboohu sagheeran aw kabeeran ila ajalihi thalikum aqsatu 'inda Allahi waaqwamu lilshshahadati waadna alla tartaboo illa an takoona tijaratan hadiratan tudeeroonaha baynakum falaysa 'alaykum junahun alla taktubooha waashhidoo itha tabaya'tum wala yudarra katibun wala shaheedun wa-in taf'aloo fa-innahu fusooqun bikum waittaqoo Allaha wayu'allimukumu Allahu waAllahu bikulli shay-in 'aleemun
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ إِذَا تَدَايَنتُم بِدَيْنٍ إِلَى أَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى فَاكْتُبُوهُ وَلْيَكْتُب بَّيْنَكُمْ كَاتِبٌ بِالْعَدْلِ وَلاَ يَأْبَ كَاتِبٌ أَنْ يَكْتُبَ كَمَا عَلَّمَهُ اللّهُ فَلْيَكْتُبْ وَلْيُمْلِلِ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ الْحَقُّ وَلْيَتَّقِ اللّهَ رَبَّهُ وَلاَ يَبْخَسْ مِنْهُ شَيْئاً فَإن كَانَ الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ الْحَقُّ سَفِيهاً أَوْ ضَعِيفاً أَوْ لاَ يَسْتَطِيعُ أَن يُمِلَّ هُوَ فَلْيُمْلِلْ وَلِيُّهُ بِالْعَدْلِ وَاسْتَشْهِدُواْ شَهِيدَيْنِ من رِّجَالِكُمْ فَإِن لَّمْ يَكُونَا رَجُلَيْنِ فَرَجُلٌ وَامْرَأَتَانِ مِمَّن تَرْضَوْنَ مِنَ الشُّهَدَاء أَن تَضِلَّ إْحْدَاهُمَا فَتُذَكِّرَ إِحْدَاهُمَا الأُخْرَى وَلاَ يَأْبَ الشُّهَدَاء إِذَا مَا دُعُواْ وَلاَ تَسْأَمُوْاْ أَن تَكْتُبُوْهُ صَغِيراً أَو كَبِيراً إِلَى أَجَلِهِ ذَلِكُمْ أَقْسَطُ عِندَ اللّهِ وَأَقْومُ لِلشَّهَادَةِ وَأَدْنَى أَلاَّ تَرْتَابُواْ إِلاَّ أَن تَكُونَ تِجَارَةً حَاضِرَةً تُدِيرُونَهَا بَيْنَكُمْ فَلَيْسَ عَلَيْكُمْ جُنَاحٌ أَلاَّ تَكْتُبُوهَا وَأَشْهِدُوْاْ إِذَا تَبَايَعْتُمْ وَلاَ يُضَآرَّ كَاتِبٌ وَلاَ شَهِيدٌ وَإِن تَفْعَلُواْ فَإِنَّهُ فُسُوقٌ بِكُمْ وَاتَّقُواْ اللّهَ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمُ اللّهُ وَاللّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمٌ
and for a good measure
Sunan Abu Dawood, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah)
Book 12, Hadith 102
Narrated 'Umar ibn al-Khattab:
The Prophet (pbuh) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.
Whats your point
Sura 4:34. Enough said
Is sharia actually really according to religion? Or is that just propaganda?
He wants to sue in a British court complete pissing joke!!! Keep it in the council lol
Beating wife is strongly prohibited in islam, but some muslim men misuse Qoran and say that Allah allowed men to beat their wives. The thing is the word 'Daraba' which is, unfortunately, mostly translated as 'beat', 'hit' or 'strike'. The translation of that word is not unique, it can also mean 'discourage', 'apart from'...IF A MAN WAS ALLOWED TO BEAT HIS WIFE IN ISLAM THEN MOHAMMED S.A.W.S. WOULD HAVE BEATEN SOME OF HIS WIVES. HE NEVER EVEN HIT AN ANIMAL.
These men are unhinged. They think I owe them. Get it out of your head...you don't own me. Make your own sammich.
This is not what Islam says he is not doing the right thing
is he drinking with his left hand ?
Hitting woman thats messed up-ua-cam.com/video/1azySjz4edk/v-deo.html
no
Ho shyte
Why is this man in this country?
Ask him. i have his number
This made me change my perspective on sharia law .
ua-cam.com/video/K54-9SInMuY/v-deo.html
then watch this
Taqayya... you can freely lie if its about religion - Q
Not surprised by any of this.
So he supported osama and we are still listening what he is saying.
Lies to control there women
Does Sharia Law allow a husband to beat his wife? This is the WRONG question! *If certain conditions are met, Shariah Law COMMANDS a husband to beat his wife* ! In Quran 4:34, we read: "Men are caretakers of women, since Allah has made some of them excel the others, and because of the wealth they have spent. So, the righteous women are obedient, (and) guard (the property and honor of their husbands) in (their) absence with the protection given by Allah. As for women of whom you fear rebellion, convince them, and leave them apart in beds, AND BEAT THEM."
This is Sick
The type of beating allowed in islam is done in every house hold and nobody even notices its like beating with a handerchief or a miswak (toothbrush) this is the allowed part which mostly people will do this even when therse no reason for it (if you think beating means slapping and other stuff thats not it at all. Islam prohibits parents from slapping their indisciplined children and yet we have “21ST CENTURY SCHOLARS IN THE COMMENT SECTION “ who dont even know the meaning are ranting about it The beating (with a toothbrushor something similar) is allowed only in severe case that is when a wife is emotionally unstable and is trying to commit suicide or something of that sort (disobediance here doesnt mean she not cooking good for the guy or any of that sort or not serving his parents ( in islam a woman isnt responsible for serving her husbands parents )disobediance as i said of something which requires action like i mentioned earlier ) as for a women in that moment of anger when the husband is behaving in such a way its not the solution in the heat of the moment if a woman beats her husband that guy might return it as physically whatever you might say about this the man in majority cases and mostly all cases is physically stronger (people saying let the wife beat him while he is sleeping thats not even allowed for husband to do ) In short in islam it is only allowed for a man to beat her wife lightly ( seriously dont know why i am even calling it beating ) only during the heat of the moment to bring her back to the senses like “when someone is dreaming we give them a shake to make them conscious ) but unfortunately this thing is common for every household where spouses do that to each other in normal times in means of teasing them but imagine both the sides are in severe anger or moment of heat and a women if she tries doing the same beating she might get a backlash thats the only reason. Read this : If a woman rebels against her husband and disobeys his commands, then he should follow this method of admonishing her, forsaking her in bed and hitting her. Hitting is subject to the condition that it should not be harsh or cause injury. Al-Hasan al-Basri said: this means that it should not cause pain.
‘Ata’ said: I said to Ibn ‘Abbaas, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, Hitting with a siwaak and the like. [A siwaak is a small stick or twig used for cleaning the teeth - Translator]