Triangle Inequality

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • Triangle Inequality
    In this video, I define the concept of an absolute value and use it to prove the triangle inequality in R, which is the most important inequality that we'll use in analysis. Enjoy!
    Check out my Real Numbers Playlist: • Real Numbers

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @MrCigarro50
    @MrCigarro50 4 роки тому +58

    I remember my Math Professor saying..." Learn as much as you can about inequalities, you will need them very very often"

    • @lordandprotector
      @lordandprotector 4 роки тому +2

      More often than not. :P

    • @myoung1445
      @myoung1445 4 роки тому +11

      If you're in first year of university or last year of school then take this advice seriously . From a panic cramming 2nd year maths student

  • @LegendOfMurray
    @LegendOfMurray 4 роки тому +13

    I wasn't expecting a dab in a math video. Excellent!

  • @tubalnavarro8962
    @tubalnavarro8962 4 роки тому +15

    That triforce in the thumbnail made me click as fast as I could

  • @Jim-be8sj
    @Jim-be8sj 4 роки тому +6

    Good one. If I remember correctly, once you get up to working in function spaces it's time for the Minkowski inequality for many of the same applications that the triangle inequality enables.

  • @cerwe8861
    @cerwe8861 4 роки тому +12

    The "dab" you have to train... xD

  • @joudy5767
    @joudy5767 4 роки тому +2

    what a coincidence that i have to prove this for my teacher and you posted this 1 day ago🤩🤩 thank uu

  • @fromblonmenchaves6161
    @fromblonmenchaves6161 2 роки тому +1

    Why in proof 1. case 1 when x ≥ 0 then x = |x| ≤ -|x| ; and not
    x = |x| ≥ -|x| ?

  • @ragokyo
    @ragokyo 4 роки тому +5

    11:34 *"the legthgh"*

  • @Apollorion
    @Apollorion 4 роки тому +4

    Is this triangle inequality also true for triangles in non euclidean spaces?

    • @EpicMathTime
      @EpicMathTime 4 роки тому +2

      Yes, it is. Non-Euclidean geometries take place in metric spaces, and the triangle inequality is required of a metric.
      The triangle inequality is foundational for the notion of "distance" or "length" to make sense. Its essence is that the distance from a to b reports the length of the shortest possible route from a to b. That's what we want distance to mean. We don't want a to be 15 miles away from b, but somehow if I go from a, to c, and then to b, I ended up traveling only 12 miles in total.

  • @MrQwefty
    @MrQwefty 4 роки тому +3

    The Cauchy Schwarz inequality is driving me mad! Will you do a video on that too?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +2

      Already done ✅

    • @MrQwefty
      @MrQwefty 4 роки тому +1

      @@drpeyam Whoops! Thank you Peyam :D

    • @putin_navsegda6487
      @putin_navsegda6487 2 роки тому

      but actually it's Cauchy-Buniakovsky inequality

  • @weimeuret7689
    @weimeuret7689 3 роки тому +1

    I was hoping you could prove the Reverse Triangle Inequality. I'm also wondering why we need to establish |a-b| is greater than the difference of their absolute values...

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  3 роки тому +3

      There’s a video on that

  • @jimmykornelijegunnarsson4265
    @jimmykornelijegunnarsson4265 4 роки тому +1

    I'm wondering why you don't consider the proof by using the dot product (a+bIa+b), seeing as the proof comes out of it naturally.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +1

      That’s the way I would have done it as well, but in that class they don’t really mention dot products or R^n

    • @jimmykornelijegunnarsson4265
      @jimmykornelijegunnarsson4265 4 роки тому +1

      @@drpeyam Oh cool.

  • @sanjeevkumardhiman6783
    @sanjeevkumardhiman6783 4 роки тому +1

    It is true coz if both a and b are positive then abs(a+b)=abs(a)+abs(b) but if one of then is negative; let’s say b is negative and let’s say that a=32 and b is equal to -31, then abs(a+b)=abs(32-31)=1; but it is not equal to abs(32)+abs(-31)=32+31=63;in fact the abs(a)+abs(b) is greater than or equal to abs(a+b). :))))

  • @LarryRiedel
    @LarryRiedel 4 роки тому +4

    I'm looking forward to Jensen's Inequality. :-)

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +1

      That’s a good one 😄

  • @minimurali9700
    @minimurali9700 3 роки тому +1

    Sir , but is there any example or case where one side will be equal to to sum of other side in a triangle ? The inequality says lesser or equal to

    • @xibbit6322
      @xibbit6322 Рік тому

      when the triangle is degenerate(smushed down into a line) this is true

  • @punditgi
    @punditgi 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome explanation!

  • @sirjackio_zw
    @sirjackio_zw 2 роки тому +1

    Did he just do the dab 9:10😂😂

  • @foreachepsilon
    @foreachepsilon 4 роки тому +1

    My linear algebra professor used to call it the donkey inequality because it’s so simple, even a donkey gets it! (The donkey of course will walk a straight line to get to water, not go in a jagged path.)

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +2

      LOL, I love this 😂

    • @foreachepsilon
      @foreachepsilon 4 роки тому +1

      Dr Peyam he still teaches at CSUF, though I guess you’re leaving UCI in the fall.

  • @ImNostalgic
    @ImNostalgic 2 роки тому +1

    was that the triforce??

  • @tymothylim6550
    @tymothylim6550 2 роки тому +1

    Great video! Thanks a lot for this :)

  • @computerguy678
    @computerguy678 Рік тому

    the triforce :skull zelda refrence

  • @DidierDegonon
    @DidierDegonon 4 роки тому +1

    you could define abs(x) = Max (x,-x), then your lemma is evident

    • @DidierDegonon
      @DidierDegonon 4 роки тому

      dam you're fast answerer, hello from France!

  • @thomasjefferson6225
    @thomasjefferson6225 2 роки тому

    Lmao I love the dab!!!! 🤣🤣🤣

  • @the_laughingbabe
    @the_laughingbabe 9 місяців тому

    You make it more harder for me😢🙆🏽‍♀️

  • @Sahanie
    @Sahanie 3 роки тому +1

    I trust my Toyota Corollary.

  • @lesprivatrizal
    @lesprivatrizal 4 роки тому

    Nice, thanks

  • @yoannroch6477
    @yoannroch6477 4 роки тому

    good video!

  • @user-qw4vg9lf5v
    @user-qw4vg9lf5v 3 роки тому

    Wait what? 🤯🤯, I.. I'm new to this

  • @kamaljitkaurdhiman7696
    @kamaljitkaurdhiman7696 4 роки тому

    Analysis is adult version of calculus. Isn't it??

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +4

      It really is!

  • @kelvinmasasire6737
    @kelvinmasasire6737 2 роки тому

    The explanation's a bit hard to grasp Doc. Its a bit too complex

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  2 роки тому +1

      Good for you

    • @mohamedtrfnx6632
      @mohamedtrfnx6632 10 місяців тому +1

      @@drpeyam i dont think its good for him that he didn't grasp it :(

  • @visualgebra
    @visualgebra 4 роки тому

    Professor ! Why It is called Triangle Inequality ?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому

      Look at the picture

  • @jamesbra4410
    @jamesbra4410 4 роки тому

    Next measure theory

  • @romaindec1717
    @romaindec1717 4 роки тому +1

    i prefer algebra.

  • @dm_saj1119
    @dm_saj1119 4 роки тому

    Hi dr 💚

  • @AditYa-sv1nz
    @AditYa-sv1nz 4 роки тому +1

    👍