I appreciate that you posted this as the journey you were on instead of recutting it to show only your final appreciation of the Woodrow. Anyway, it was an honest and fun video to watch. And it convinced me to add a Woodrow to my Dream and Ruby, which I love. And it’s good to know you’re a reliable ask if I need help moving at some point.
Thanks for watching. I thought it would have been dishonest to not show the mindset change, and also that it might be similar to what other guitarists have felt! Let me know when you're moving and Ill check my calendar! haha
Thank you so much. I was at first convinced the Woodrow would be the one for me, but opted for the Dream when I heard about the tricky aspects you mention. Now giving Mr. Woodrow another serious thought ...
Hey man, I'm loving the channel! The Joyo reviews were especially cool! It's not often you see UA-camrs put out videos that high in quality talking about cheap gear like that. That's definitely a niche I've been searching for, so I hope you'll keep reviewing cheaper pedals that you like for us frugal folks! :)
I just got a bunch of $100-$150 pedals that sound amazing that I am going to review. Not super cheap but not boutique either. I think I have a new Joyo coming as well. I’ll be sure to always dip my toes into every price category.
I had a bassman tweed amp before and I love it so much sold it long time ago it was a big regret. After watching you woodrow review I think I decided to get one of this amazing box. Thanks for a great detailed review.
Probably the most honest review I’ve seen online. Thank you. I do have the Woodrow and you’re absolutely correct… When you hit that sound that is perfect then you’d be hard-pressed to do it any better even with an actual amp. It just takes a while to get there. Huge supporter of universal audio, and I have a lot of their stuff, but you are correct on a lot of your rants… They could’ve done a few more things to make it a little bit more usable, but maybe the beauty is in the struggle!
I have all five of the UAFX amp pedals having a lot of fun and getting a lot of inspiration they are definitely heading in the right direction for modeling. I hate the option paralysis of the big boards. These amp pedals have more than enough options. I totally agree with your rants. It’s the same stuff I’ve noticed things that could possibly be corrected with an update??? I hope the guys at Universal audio see this video and do the right thing with the next updates I love your channel. You’re definitely next level UA-cam Keep up the good work
Awesome videos Alex, much appreciated. Woodrow has had a new lease of life for me with Treble Boost in front and into an Ox Stomp > PA. So much fun to play.
Wow thanks so much for the super thanks, Robin! Really appreciate it. Stoked that you’re digging the Woodrow. It’s a really special pedal for sure. I gotta try a treble boost in front now!
@@SuperdangerStudios Pleasure Alex - keep up the excellent work & maybe setup a patreon if it suits you (I was looking for that on your profile). Treble Boost into all of the UA pedals works really well. It shows just how much like real amps these pedals really are!
This is one of the most insightful guitar videos I’ve ever seen - genius. (Oh and I’m a new convert to UAFX pedals in my live rig so this has a few “ah-ha” moments for me.). Well done 🤘
I’ve been using the woodrow a lot. Some things I’ve realized: - it sounds bright alone but to me in a mix it’s perfect; clear and not overly bright - “edge of breakup” is the iffy zone because of the crackle. but if you feed in a bright enough tone, it kinds melds w the crackle and sounds good - cleanest cleans sound excellent and raw - cranked sound is just super rad overall it’s got a uniquely high fidelity while managing to be organic. super cool.
Hi! Just discovered your channel, that's a great review! Instant subscription. I use to own a 78' Princeton Silverface, that I sadly sold a few years ago (still regreting it...) So when I heard about these UAFX pedal, I immediately listened to the Dream 65 one, to see if it was an good option. It clearly is. Then came here for curiosity, just to check what the Tweed sound is. And... WOW!!! That fingerplayed, warm, VERY dynamic clean sound at the begining was a revelation! And all the overdrive panel is a wonderful bonus. Bye Dreamy and welcome Woodrow 🙂
Hey Alex, recently stumbled across your channel & have been lovin it - Hi from across the pond btw, hope you’re very well! Great channel, thanks for putting it together.
Fantastic video. I love the clean and breakup tones you're getting out of this. I wish it were possible to assign different reverbs to that Room control though. I don't think I'd need anything more than this to go out and play shows! Fantastic playing
@@SuperdangerStudios Your videos have really helped me this week, in two ways. Firstly thinking more about how to build the tones I want on record. Building backwards from the speaker is helping me get what I really want. Secondly the thumb-over style is something I'm going to work on. Those voicings suit a lot of what I write but that's given me somewhere further to go. Thanks for such great insights. Huge fan of what you're doing.
Strongly considering these pedals, I think pairing them with a Two notes CAB M speaker sim pedal would make it too notch (with a good amount of speaker type/mic placement capabilities)
I just fully stepped into the digital world, I have had a DAW for a while and messed around with some free software for a few years, and if you have some patience, I think you can get by with just a guitar a cable and an interface. But I am a guitar player in 2023 and I just have to buy the next bigger and better thing. I hated digital amps until I tried Tonex, now I am swapping cabs and amps like crazy. I think the next thing in line for guitar sound will be captures that are adjustable. It may be a while before we get that in a nice easy to use box. I get why people would like the UA amps in a box, we dont NEED all of the tones, just a few really good ones! Heck, even after you find an amp tone you like, you have an almost infinite amount of IRs lol I like the process of it all, but I could see people getting option paralysis very easily though.
First ever seeing this channel. Subscribed! Wonderful video and appreciated the delve into the psychology of the mind of a guitarist! A dangerous place…😂 I’m a huge fan of the UA pedals. Have the Ruby and the new Lion and LOVE them. You have to really spend time with them though, kind of like a Mesa Mark amp. Like feeding a squirrel from your hand,..🤷♂️ Anyway, will check out more videos…
I enjoyed your review and I am glad that you are now enjoying the pedal. It is my favourite from their amp sim range and I am lucky enough to own a real tweed deluxe and it is my favourite amplifier. I originally bought the amp to get the blue note jazz sound. I love the warmth in the midrange and the slight crunchiness which I much prefer to the super clean sterile sounds used by many for jazz. I also use it for other styles and love it for blues. I often put the amp through more modern speakers and it works well with my THD 2x12 which gives it much more headroom. One feature that is missing in the pedal is the strange interaction between the instrument and mic channels. For example you can plug into the the instrument channel and then turn the volume control flat out on the mic channel and you will get a fabulous clean sound. On the pedal both channels are bridged and so you can’t do what I have just described. To be honest this is not a major issue as you can find great clean sounds from the pedal. I use the pedals with a line 6 powercab which works well live.
Thanks so much. I am dying to get my hands on a real tweed again. Hopefully I can own one within the year. I'd like to see what the UAFX pedals sound like through a fryette powerstation and a 1x12 g12h or Celestion Creamback. Cheers!
As a Lanois fan (especially when he fuzzes out both with and without a pedal-bit also can roll back the volume and get chime-tones), and a lover of my Rivera S120 4x10 channel 2, this thing is the closest I’ve heard to those aesthetics. I am super appreciative of this video and it feels like it was made just for me and my search for a portable modern solution apart from my 100 lbs amp.
My playing style is probably not conducive to this pedal. Love your playing and the different sounds you coax out of it though. Gave my son a Dream pedal as it’s easier to operate but this quirky pedal is perhaps the most fun to mess with. Thanks for the awesome vid 🙏 ❤ love from the Netherlands 🇳🇱 ❤
Great gift for your son! And yes this pedal is a very tricky pedal at times but rewards experimentation. Thanks so much for watching and the kind words. Cheers!
Very very good video. I really enjoy your honesty. I recently got a Dream 65 for quiet stages, however I find myself using it in more situations than I planned. It sounds fantastic. And I’m a self confessed ‘amp guy.’ I didn’t really want to believe it was that good, but the consistency of sound is a massive positive for me at this stage. I am glad I didn’t get the Woodrow though haha. Anyway, thanks for the great video and fantastic playing.
Thanks so much for the kind words. The Dream is so insanely good. Nailed the tone. The Woodrow required much more patience. The Dream is literally plug and play. Cheers and thanks for watching!
@@brandoncharles4781 To me, I think the Dream 65 is more of a blank canvass in terms of amp sound. The Woodrow sounds very much it’s own thing, which I don’t think I could personally use in a variety of situations. I don’t think it sounds as good as the Dream 65. But that’s just what my ears are drawn to.
@@SuperdangerStudios I'm pretty new to playing. So my experience is limited especially when it comes to real amps compared to modelers. With that said this pedal feels organic, when I push it it feels like the pine box is flexing. It doesn't feel like a digital copy, UA did a fantastic job.
I might have to add the Woodrow to my collection. Never really connected with digital amps until i tried the Dream 65. Its a fantastic modeler. I ended up buying the Ruby 63 as well, but rarely use it. Not really my cup of tea, but every now and then its nice to dial in that chimey clean tone AC's are amazing at. I do like how the Woodrow is still in that Fender clean ballpark, but with more mids
I’m really looking forward to this. I can understand the love/hate relationship with it. There are a lot of sounds in it that I don’t like, BUT I’ve found some sounds that I do like. Driving it I can get a cool old school Muddy Waters Rollin’ Stone kind of a sound, and combing with my Flint and Deco, I can get some really cool sounds from early Blue Note to rockabilly. I don’t really crank the gain on it, so I’m curious if I can get some ideas from you for other tones. My favorite speaker sim is the standard one actually. It sounds great when turning up the tone knob.
i have had to work more on this pedal to get desirable tones on this pedal than almost all other pedals combined. That being said, the tones I did achieve were very good. I loved the first speaker sim as well, the celestion blue. Is that the one you are talking about?
@@SuperdangerStudios I like the Blue and stock Jensen speakers the best. For the bonus cabs, I think I like the Bassman best, but mostly stick to the Blue and stock Jensen.
@@SuperdangerStudios Bad news though - I have one on the way and this is entirely because of you. So you gifted me hours to fiddle with it now, but it seems to be all worth it. Cheers mate, love ur vids!
@@SuperdangerStudios Woodrow in da house today boy, this shit is massive haha. I played it briefly now and i really like it! It does great great edge of breakup, great fuzz (what a WILD tone). On top of that I was looking for Gary Clark Jr. Tone for some time now, and it is dead simple now where he got it from. No need of pedals or anything. This thing growl, I like it a lot. Also when set it at max fuzz - it is nice to toy around with guitar volume pot to do some crazy swells. Try it out :D. Thanks mate! It was worth it, i got it mint way cheaper - I guess not everyone likes it.
I really enjoyed the video. The only thing I would say is that while I would agree with most of what you say, I’ve found the speakers really depend on the guitar you are using. I’m playing a lot with a 1979-80 Yamaha SG800 these days and find the stock Jensen speaker actually suits it best for most applications, perhaps because that guitar is so thick sounding (I thick Frusciante described the Yamaha SGs as having almost an organ tone). I also agree it can be a frustrating pedal, and if it wasn’t so pricey I probably wouldn’t have spent the time to try to find good sounds on it. I also agree that I wish they had given us more options for the room.
This is by far the best analysis I’ve seen of this pedal. I get what you are saying about the ‘fizziness’ of the sound. I’m trying to dial in a Neil Young type sound and all I can hear is the artificial fizz sound. It’s actually quite annoying. It’s all I can hear now. I’m not sure about the pedal now. It sort of sounds amazing but I can’t seem to find a sound I’m happy with it.. And I totally agree with what you said about the ‘room’ knob. What’s the point of it ? I would rather they offered a proper reverb option or a selection of ‘room’ types. Another thing, I think the pedal heavily compresses your input signal. When I run a reverb pedal at a very low level before the Woodrow, it’s super loud from the get go which leads me to believe that there is an in-built compressor ratcheting up the signal; the more drive you dial in, the more compressed the input signal is, which is not how a 5E3 (or at least my 5E3) behaves. Sure the reverb gets louder but it’s not the entire sound. Q - were you running your reverb before or after the pedal in the recording ?
One thing that really helped w the fizz is using a third party IR instead of the built in speakers. Other people gripe that it's not as authentic but what matters most is if you like it! I really like the York Audio ones obviously. But lots of great ones out there. I was also running reverb after the Woodrow. I think you're right, there's a comp in front of the Woodrow but I think it might be in all the UAFX pedals. Cheers!
EVERY other review of this pedal, or the Dream, or the Marshall one, EVERY ONE of them, aside from this one, has an enormous gulf of volume between the spoken parts and the playing parts. Thank you for being the first and only guy to not do that. Everybody doing every guitar video from now on, take a dadgum note: keep the volume consistent.
This is such a great video and I agree with the points raised. We all know that UA make some fantastic gear, and I think their developers must be some of the best in the business. I do have issues with UA though and they really frustrate me. I have issue with what they put in, and what they leave out of their gear. At some point, and I don’t think I am alone with this opinion, I’m going to say, you know what, you might be the best at what you do, but this other piece of gear gives me x, y and z and you’ve only given me x, so I’m now going with the other company. I think UA are resting on their laurels somewhat, and due to how they position their gear in the marketplace, in my opinion, for maximum profit, they are beginning to frustrate their customers. Nothing wrong with companies making a profit, but there comes a point where it begins to look like they are milking it. Another gripe from me, support your existing products. Look at the Ox, one firmware release since launch (or one that their customers wanted). Compare that to the Helix. Point made.
I love the pedigree of UA and the pedals really are first class. But like you, sometimes I am confused by their product decisions and what they decide to include or exclude. All that being said, still an amazing company with top tier products. That is interesting about the Ox though. So many people use it, would make sense to keep people buying it through small consistent updates.
@@SuperdangerStudios agreed, nothing fundamentally wrong with the Ox, it’s hands down the best bit of kit I’ve ever bought, but a few more effects wouldn’t be too much to ask. Keep doing what you are doing. Your videos are top notch.
Hey man! Thanks for these incredible reviews of the new uad pedals, great playing also 🙏🏻 Did you notice that sort of digital clipping (dunno how to call it) on all uad pedals? I use iridium but recently grabbed dream65 for a test - great dynamics and feel overall but that fizz/clipping on the breakup and overdriven tones drives me nuts! At first i thought that dream 65 had an issue but after listening tons of vids I now think that clipping is everywhere (dream, wooddraw, ruby)
Yes I am aware of it! That crackle or clipping is part of the authentic sound of the amps I am told. Every time I bring it up I get comments saying “ITS AUTHENTIC” to which I respond, “I dont care it doesn’t sound good!” haha. There are ways around it but it is there on all settings.
As usual, a GREAT Video Alex! I definitely love the Woodrow '55, but I'm torn between it and a Dream '65. I'm a Songwriter/Singer who plays drums, bass guitar, keyboards, and now I'm an admittedly novice Stratocaster player as well :) My genres are Pop/R&B/New Country/Jazz/Funk, and either the Dream or Woodrow will be the only "amp" I have, which in turn will go directly into my UAD Apollo. If it's relevant, I have a pedalboard that has a StroboStomp HD, a Wampler Ego V2, an Archer iKon, a MXR Chorus, a Supro Tremolo (which I will sell if I go with the Dream), and a Keeley Halo. Well, that's the wind-up and the pitch Alex, so what's you valued suggestion?
Thanks so much for watching!. Sounds like you have a great setup. I would recommend the dream over the Woodrow bc it’s much easier to get a wide variety of sounds for your genre. Also I wouldn’t get rid of your tremolo pedal just get as the tremolo functionality on the dream is hidden behind the alternate knobs and it can be tricky to manage at times. The Dream handles overdrive and modulation just a bit better in my opinion and the spring reverb is perfect on it. Hope this helps!. Let me know how it goes! Cheers, Alex
Appreciate the walkthrough and great playing. I’m actually hoping this captures the recorded sound of a 5E3 through a Blue from the “The Drop” by the Spin Doctors. Regarding the rants: I’m curious if the latency is simulated “sag” but assuming you can tell the difference. And to your Simpson reference, if Santiago didn’t give us the cone cry we’d complain about “something missing”.
Wow! Thanks so much for the super thanks. And yes, the drop is a great track. It can get that tone for sure but it might need some eq and room added in post to get it exactly like it. And you’re right the sag was playing a factor but I didn’t know when the latency stopped and the sag started. Either way, it’s noticeable but not a deal breaker. Agree w the cone cry but I’d love to be able to turn it off in the options! Thanks again!
UA if you are watching, my wish for an update would be for you to give us the Strymon Iridium trick for the reverb and let us hold both switches down and turn the knob to change between a few room sounds (ideally from your modeling of famous studios, although anything would be appreciated). The reason I want it this way and not with the app is that I’m worried that over time if app development is discontinued we will lose access to all of those features. I bet you could increase sales with more usable reverb. FWIW, I wouldn’t mind a few different spring reverb settings on the Dream as well since we don’t have control over the reverb parameters, but it’s a much more essential upgrade for the Woodrow IMO.
Question for ya: Have you put a treble booster like a Rangemaster in front of any O these amp pedals? I'm especially interested in how the Iridium responds. I believe in one of your other videos you stated that the Woodrow did not respond well to external drives n boosts?. I just sprang for an Iridium so I'll find out when it gets here. Pretty sure I saw some vids about the Iridium doing well with drives but I don't recall treble boost being mentioned.
I don’t actually own a treble boost style pedal. Only an Octavia, a jordan fuzz, and a Mythos Golden Fleece. IMO the iridium takes fuzz well but usually when it’s stacked with an OD.
I was checking out this video again and thought it was worth mentioning that some of the artist and factory presets have a completely different reverb algorithm. Larger, wider, etc. So I tend think of my starting point as a particular preset’s reverb and tweak the amp and cab from there.
It's driving me nuts that nobody has put out a 1963 Vibroverb sim. My favorite amp of all time and they cost at least $10000 haha. Thanks for the video!
Oh man that’d be so cool to have a great sim. I think Origin Effects Revival Drive can get a little bit close with a good IR. But yeah, nothing really centered on that sound. Thanks for watching!
Hello :) I'm new to guitar and gear for it and I'm confused. Would this work with an amp like Boss katana 50? or does it need a different type of speaker? The sound @ 8:05 made me want one so bad :)) great play
This is an amp simulation pedal so you’d go out of the Woodrow pedal into the power amp input on the back of the boss katana. It would sound really good but the speaker on the boss katana is much more low end than a typical tweed.
You stated that the "sound in the room" is what we're chasing, which is sadly only something a guitarist is ever going to hear. I bought the UA Ruby and also found this to be true. It's a great sound and as close to a real AC30 as you'll likely ever get without an AC30. But I tried to gig the Ruby through monitors. There's just something the mic'd sound can't capture. The attack and energy of the amp pushing the real guitar speakers in the room with you. So, I have my AC15 behind me, and the Ruby is what the audience hears through the FOH. This way, I get both, don't have to worry about mics, and I can dial more Ruby in my monitor if the AC15 isn't enough volume for the venue.
Could the room effect on this pedal be achieved with just a slapback echo? It sounds pretty similar to my dd-3 with a short delay. Thanks for the great vid.
I love these pedals. I think UA nailed it on all four. I don’t perform on stage and not sure I would like it live. For recording they are very cool and sound fantastic. IMO
Does it feel like you are playing an amp or an Overdrive/Fuzz? Really interested in this pedal but I don't know much how I'd use those flubbier fuzzy sounds. I also don't know why they didn't make a Marshall Super Lead or JCM pedal. Would have been the perfect 4th pedal for the lineup.
They gotta have a Marshall style pedal in the works right now. Right? Also I’d say this pedal feels like an amp at low gain and like a fuzz at higher. But that’s how I interpret it. I think the Dream feels like an amp all around.
@@SuperdangerStudios Thanks, that answers my question. The Woodrow is cool, but I think a Marshall style- UA pedal would be way more useful if done correctly. So, I am holding out hope! The idea of having a 55' Tweed in a box seems awesome, but its just not versatile enough I think.
The Woodrow does sound really good. I haven't tried it w a poweramp. Don't own one get and would want to do extensive research before promoting it but I will say that it sounded great Infront of my blues jr set to really flat and that kind of approximates a clean poweramp. Sorry I don't have more insight!
Yeah, I don't understand the point of the room knob on really any amp modeler, whether it's the uafx, iridium, whatever unit has it. Never found a use for it, and it doesn't make it feel any more like an amp in a room. As for UA modeling the speaker crackle and stuff, I actually kinda like it. The uafx amps are very much the good, the bad, and the ugly from their real amp counterparts. The iridium may be more polished, but it's missing some of that raw sound from the uafx pedals.
Right? What's the deal w the room? And I do like the crackle here and there, but I wish there was an option to turn it off as well. Since it's digital, should be pretty straightforward. Maybe a firmware update in the future? haha who knows. Cheers!
I'm trying to search for someone that has run one of these UAFX pedals using the '4 cable method' into a Marshall combo via the FXloop. It would be great if my DSL20 had a clean fender channel. (fyi, I have a Vintage 30 speaker in my combo). Unsure what the poweramp in the marshall would do to the Woodrow tone though.
Yeah i haven't seen many people use the uafx pedals that way. And to be honest, I am sure it sounds good bc I was running them into the front of my amp the other day (minus the speaker sim) and it sounded great. Ruby, Dream, and Woodrow all sounded great and imparted the unique tones of the pedals no problem.
As musicians, we all have to play the room whether practicing, performing, or live recording- a lot for just for how it feels to us while playing perhaps. We all know that feeling of "how's the room? Sound-good for hearing yourself and the band?" There can be overwhelming variables that are then stacked on top of way too many choices to shape the tone we're hearing in our heads. In the end, if given a $50 guitar and a $20 amp, we still have quickly set aside the quality or our personal biases towards the gear), play well, and sound great especially in front of an audience. It's not always a pleasant experience but, any chance to play music is always good for the soul.
I have to qualify your comment at 31:20 about the interactive volume controls. The actual 5e3 volumes and tone are linked before the phase inverter. Plug into the bright channel WITHOUT using a jumper, then turn up the unused normal volume around 3 o'clock to 5 o'clock. Flabby bass energy is shunted to ground. You will hear a much better edge-of-breakup than just bright volume at 2-3 is. Heavy grit is reduced--much smoother, more responsive to the energy you put into the strings. Woodrow won't do that. And unfortunately, that's the best part of a 5e3. And alo why it's not on boards.
Yes! I have Lollar imperial in the neck and a Lollar special t in the bridge! Here is a video I did on it. Cheers! ua-cam.com/video/FJbNF_hYrzk/v-deo.html
I feel it with all of them but it’s not significant in any meaningful way. But I think the sag was pronouncing the effect as well. Still amazing pedals though.
@@mofateam1 Thanks so much! You're right. I suppose it will affect your playing to a degree but anything less than 20ms I usually adjust to and forget about.
Your videos really are the best. When I see you reviewing a product, I know that it will be the most in depth video that exists based on real experience. Clone yourself so you have more time to review things please.
You sound amazing playing through a tweed style amp. Every pro player eventually learns it’s all about the mids and dynamic attack. Then effect’s maybe before or after the amp.
I really want one! I tried the Mesa Cali too. Loved it but I want to see what this Vintage Sound Tweed 15 sounds like. And I agree, the room sound can be captured but it is really hard to capture the energy of what you hear when you're standing in front of it.
Strymon pedals are great but the iridium and amp sims are pathetic compared to the dynamics and response of a real tube amp. Your blues Jr is just a taste of real amp goodness. Get a real amp please!
@@TimMilliken haha I have had too many amps to count but got rid of all of them except for the blues Jr bc it just wasn’t practical. The one I miss the most is my 64 Bassman. Cannot believe I sold that one. Ah well. Once it makes sense again I’m going back in with a tweed. And then maybe a Vox style amp.
@@SuperdangerStudios your fellow UA-camr Jack Fosset also said his tweed Bassman was the best sounding amp he ever played. The Mesa Cali does that 40 watt 4 6v6 thing too with a nice verb although I don’t really like their speaker choice. I still rock a $200 super champ xd for a bunch of gigs because it’s so convenient to carry and sounds like a tube Bassman on the normal channel.
I actually want some of the crackle. That’s what I miss on the ACS1 which smooths out the sound too much. The ACS1 attenuates stuff above 10kHz WITHOUT the IRs engaged. Which is fine for some cleans and low gain stuff, but really dampens higher gain distortions too much when compared to my real amp
I swear the whole UAFX line up is great sounding pedals with the stupidest feature set they could have chosen. Your videos got me interested in the Strymon Iridium again and I feel it's just so much better as a practical digital pedal. Just throw in some nicer IRs. The UA stuff sounds more realistic but that "warts and all" approach just has undesirables that would be nice to be able to dial out on a digital unit.
It is very interesting. Bc I love the sound of these UA pedals almost all the time, but the times I don't I really don't. I understand chasing the realism but I would just love the option to turn any of the realism off as well. Cheers!
Thank you. I HATE that frying bacon crackle that a lot of sims have. It's probably accurate in a way I guess, but it's what I always tried to get rid of in the studio.
For the price of this you could have an IK tonex pedal that does a more accurate model of a bassman, the other amps UAD makes you purchase a separate DSP pedal for, or any other amp or speaker under the sun (plus reverb, EQ, compression...)
That’s true! The tonex wasn’t available when I bought this. I use amplitube as well and am familiar w their tone/algorithm and I think they both do a great job. And yes it’s probably cheaper to just have a tonex but where’s the fun in that? Haha
I really wish they had added a headphone jack. I realize, I can use it with my interface and use that headphone, but itd be nice to be able to just use the pedal like the Iridium.
Room is there to give the feeling of 50's records. The records were recorded live and the whole band was in the same room. So it's not what they could have done, it is there because they wanted it to sound like guitars in 50's records.
I'm tired of hearing all of the critical feedback about this pedal. Frankly, it's an awesome pedal. All Fender amps are geared toward clean and low-gain sounds, so why is the expectation somehow different for this than the Dream? Sure, Neil Young likes to crank them, but that's not a very common sound in general. I use this to make a perfect 2-channel Fender with a fat bluesy low-gain Blonde Bassman tone (like McCready on Yellow Ledbetter) on one channel and punchy bright Brown Vibrolux clean (like Knopfler on Sultans) on the other. I run a RevivalTrem into it for the gain, and it's an awesome pairing. Sounds far more like a real amp than the Iridium even with the YA IRs. Don't get me wrong, the Iridium is great at sounding like a pedal that sounds like an amp, but the Woodrow just sounds like an amp. So people just need to be clear on what they're looking for. If you want the scooped, tight negative feedback clean sound, get the Dream. If you want a rounder, bluesier, more saggy and organic clean sound, get the Woodrow.
Exactly. I think people were confused on what they were trying to get. I think the pedal sounds better into an amp than on its on DI. But it provides an amazing tweed experience. Lots of tones to unearth on it. Cheers!
I want to want that pedal, but im so concerned I won't like it. I'm not a fuzz guy at all. But I really want THAT vintage clean tone. For overdrives, I have a Wampler Pantheon Deluxe. Gives me plenty of drives you tweak.
I have a feeling that the empty cab slot on the UAFX pedals, and the inability to load your own IR, is in anticipation of the release of an Ox pedal. Leave it empty so the amp pedals can interface with the Ox pedal. Just seems like a very UAD thing to do. As good as their gear is, they are run by accountants and marketing people as much as engineers and designers.
Yeah I am not doubting that it's authentic, just wondering why that is included. Would love to be able to turn it off. That's all. 62? Is that a 6g3 deluxe?
FYI- there is a firmware update that fixes the volume issue. I had this same issue and it was immediately solved after the update.
Oh wow good to know! Thanks
So impressed with your production. Don't think anyone else is doing the kind of in-depth, thoughtful work that you are doing. Great stuff!
Wow thank you so much. Thrilled you enjoyed it! More to come!
incredible editing, playing, explaining, demonstrating. subbed within the first few minutes
Awesome, thank you! Welcome to the club!
I appreciate that you posted this as the journey you were on instead of recutting it to show only your final appreciation of the Woodrow. Anyway, it was an honest and fun video to watch. And it convinced me to add a Woodrow to my Dream and Ruby, which I love. And it’s good to know you’re a reliable ask if I need help moving at some point.
Thanks for watching. I thought it would have been dishonest to not show the mindset change, and also that it might be similar to what other guitarists have felt! Let me know when you're moving and Ill check my calendar! haha
Man! The way you "tell the stories" it is amazing. Really really good youtube material. Congrats!
Thanks so much! More to come. Cheers!
Thank you so much. I was at first convinced the Woodrow would be the one for me, but opted for the Dream when I heard about the tricky aspects you mention. Now giving Mr. Woodrow another serious thought ...
It really is such a unique pedal! Nothing else like it on the market.
Hey man, I'm loving the channel! The Joyo reviews were especially cool! It's not often you see UA-camrs put out videos that high in quality talking about cheap gear like that. That's definitely a niche I've been searching for, so I hope you'll keep reviewing cheaper pedals that you like for us frugal folks! :)
I just got a bunch of $100-$150 pedals that sound amazing that I am going to review. Not super cheap but not boutique either. I think I have a new Joyo coming as well. I’ll be sure to always dip my toes into every price category.
I had a bassman tweed amp before and I love it so much sold it long time ago it was a big regret. After watching you woodrow review I think I decided to get one of this amazing box. Thanks for a great detailed review.
Thanks for watching! Oh man I would love to own a tweed Bassman. I think you’ll dig this pedal man. Cheers!
Probably the most honest review I’ve seen online. Thank you. I do have the Woodrow and you’re absolutely correct… When you hit that sound that is perfect then you’d be hard-pressed to do it any better even with an actual amp. It just takes a while to get there. Huge supporter of universal audio, and I have a lot of their stuff, but you are correct on a lot of your rants… They could’ve done a few more things to make it a little bit more usable, but maybe the beauty is in the struggle!
Thanks man! It was quite a journey with this pedal! But you're right, when you find the tone in this pedal it is unbelievable.
I have all five of the UAFX amp pedals having a lot of fun and getting a lot of inspiration they are definitely heading in the right direction for modeling. I hate the option paralysis of the big boards. These amp pedals have more than enough options. I totally agree with your rants. It’s the same stuff I’ve noticed things that could possibly be corrected with an update???
I hope the guys at Universal audio see this video and do the right thing with the next updates
I love your channel. You’re definitely next level UA-cam
Keep up the good work
Awesome videos Alex, much appreciated. Woodrow has had a new lease of life for me with Treble Boost in front and into an Ox Stomp > PA. So much fun to play.
Wow thanks so much for the super thanks, Robin! Really appreciate it. Stoked that you’re digging the Woodrow. It’s a really special pedal for sure. I gotta try a treble boost in front now!
@@SuperdangerStudios Pleasure Alex - keep up the excellent work & maybe setup a patreon if it suits you (I was looking for that on your profile).
Treble Boost into all of the UA pedals works really well. It shows just how much like real amps these pedals really are!
This is one of the most insightful guitar videos I’ve ever seen - genius. (Oh and I’m a new convert to UAFX pedals in my live rig so this has a few “ah-ha” moments for me.). Well done 🤘
So happy you enjoyed it. Thanks for watching!
I’ve been using the woodrow a lot.
Some things I’ve realized:
- it sounds bright alone but to me in a mix it’s perfect; clear and not overly bright
- “edge of breakup” is the iffy zone because of the crackle. but if you feed in a bright enough tone, it kinds melds w the crackle and sounds good
- cleanest cleans sound excellent and raw
- cranked sound is just super rad
overall it’s got a uniquely high fidelity while managing to be organic. super cool.
Great insights. Agreed on All of your points. Really unique and beautiful sounding pedal.
Hey, great presentation. You’re a gifted communicator.
Thanks so much! I kind of ranted in this video but happy that didnt detract from the message.
Hi! Just discovered your channel, that's a great review! Instant subscription.
I use to own a 78' Princeton Silverface, that I sadly sold a few years ago (still regreting it...) So when I heard about these UAFX pedal, I immediately listened to the Dream 65 one, to see if it was an good option. It clearly is. Then came here for curiosity, just to check what the Tweed sound is. And... WOW!!! That fingerplayed, warm, VERY dynamic clean sound at the begining was a revelation! And all the overdrive panel is a wonderful bonus.
Bye Dreamy and welcome Woodrow 🙂
haha great to hear. Thanks for the sub! The Woodrow is a very special pedal for the right guitarist. It sounds like it'll be right up your alley!
Hey Alex, recently stumbled across your channel & have been lovin it - Hi from across the pond btw, hope you’re very well! Great channel, thanks for putting it together.
Awesome! Thank you for watching! More to come!
Thanks for the video! I just went and bought one! I LOVE it!
Glad I could help! Enjoy the tones my man!
Great video and playing, as always!
Thanks again, my friend! Cheers!
Fantastic video. I love the clean and breakup tones you're getting out of this. I wish it were possible to assign different reverbs to that Room control though. I don't think I'd need anything more than this to go out and play shows!
Fantastic playing
Thanks for watching! Agreed, would love a little flexibility on the room reverb. Ah well! Still a great little pedal.
@@SuperdangerStudios Your videos have really helped me this week, in two ways.
Firstly thinking more about how to build the tones I want on record. Building backwards from the speaker is helping me get what I really want.
Secondly the thumb-over style is something I'm going to work on. Those voicings suit a lot of what I write but that's given me somewhere further to go.
Thanks for such great insights. Huge fan of what you're doing.
Strongly considering these pedals, I think pairing them with a Two notes CAB M speaker sim pedal would make it too notch (with a good amount of speaker type/mic placement capabilities)
This is a special amplifier, amazing!
Its a great pedal! Lots of tones!
I just fully stepped into the digital world, I have had a DAW for a while and messed around with some free software for a few years, and if you have some patience, I think you can get by with just a guitar a cable and an interface. But I am a guitar player in 2023 and I just have to buy the next bigger and better thing. I hated digital amps until I tried Tonex, now I am swapping cabs and amps like crazy. I think the next thing in line for guitar sound will be captures that are adjustable. It may be a while before we get that in a nice easy to use box. I get why people would like the UA amps in a box, we dont NEED all of the tones, just a few really good ones! Heck, even after you find an amp tone you like, you have an almost infinite amount of IRs lol I like the process of it all, but I could see people getting option paralysis very easily though.
First ever seeing this channel. Subscribed! Wonderful video and appreciated the delve into the psychology of the mind of a guitarist! A dangerous place…😂 I’m a huge fan of the UA pedals. Have the Ruby and the new Lion and LOVE them. You have to really spend time with them though, kind of like a Mesa Mark amp. Like feeding a squirrel from your hand,..🤷♂️ Anyway, will check out more videos…
Love the UAFX pedals. Really fun sounds out of them! Been digging the ox stomp lately. Thanks for watching and subscribing!
I enjoyed your review and I am glad that you are now enjoying the pedal. It is my favourite from their amp sim range and I am lucky enough to own a real tweed deluxe and it is my favourite amplifier. I originally bought the amp to get the blue note jazz sound. I love the warmth in the midrange and the slight crunchiness which I much prefer to the super clean sterile sounds used by many for jazz. I also use it for other styles and love it for blues. I often put the amp through more modern speakers and it works well with my THD 2x12 which gives it much more headroom. One feature that is missing in the pedal is the strange interaction between the instrument and mic channels. For example you can plug into the the instrument channel and then turn the volume control flat out on the mic channel and you will get a fabulous clean sound. On the pedal both channels are bridged and so you can’t do what I have just described. To be honest this is not a major issue as you can find great clean sounds from the pedal. I use the pedals with a line 6 powercab which works well live.
Thanks so much. I am dying to get my hands on a real tweed again. Hopefully I can own one within the year. I'd like to see what the UAFX pedals sound like through a fryette powerstation and a 1x12 g12h or Celestion Creamback. Cheers!
Did you ever get to try this?@@SuperdangerStudios
@@TheStevem12065 i actually tried it through my boss katana power amp input and it sounded great
I'll do a video on it soon
As a Lanois fan (especially when he fuzzes out both with and without a pedal-bit also can roll back the volume and get chime-tones), and a lover of my Rivera S120 4x10 channel 2, this thing is the closest I’ve heard to those aesthetics. I am super appreciative of this video and it feels like it was made just for me and my search for a portable modern solution apart from my 100 lbs amp.
Stoked this video was helpful for you! It's a great little pedal, just takes a bit of time to find your tone you're off to the races.
My playing style is probably not conducive to this pedal. Love your playing and the different sounds you coax out of it though. Gave my son a Dream pedal as it’s easier to operate but this quirky pedal is perhaps the most fun to mess with. Thanks for the awesome vid 🙏 ❤ love from the Netherlands 🇳🇱 ❤
Great gift for your son! And yes this pedal is a very tricky pedal at times but rewards experimentation. Thanks so much for watching and the kind words. Cheers!
Sounds awesome to my ears.
Very very good video. I really enjoy your honesty.
I recently got a Dream 65 for quiet stages, however I find myself using it in more situations than I planned. It sounds fantastic. And I’m a self confessed ‘amp guy.’ I didn’t really want to believe it was that good, but the consistency of sound is a massive positive for me at this stage. I am glad I didn’t get the Woodrow though haha.
Anyway, thanks for the great video and fantastic playing.
Thanks so much for the kind words. The Dream is so insanely good. Nailed the tone. The Woodrow required much more patience. The Dream is literally plug and play. Cheers and thanks for watching!
Why are you glad you got the dream instead?
@@brandoncharles4781 To me, I think the Dream 65 is more of a blank canvass in terms of amp sound. The Woodrow sounds very much it’s own thing, which I don’t think I could personally use in a variety of situations. I don’t think it sounds as good as the Dream 65. But that’s just what my ears are drawn to.
@@JonMackenzieGuitarist I was leaning towards Woodrow but now I want the Lion...
@@brandoncharles4781 yeah the Lion looks/sounds awesome.
Loved your video. I just got mine today and right out of the gate I love it!! I can't find a bad tone.
Great to hear! It's not talked about often as the dream and ruby take center stage but it really is the most fun out of all of them.
@@SuperdangerStudios I'm pretty new to playing. So my experience is limited especially when it comes to real amps compared to modelers. With that said this pedal feels organic, when I push it it feels like the pine box is flexing. It doesn't feel like a digital copy, UA did a fantastic job.
I might have to add the Woodrow to my collection. Never really connected with digital amps until i tried the Dream 65. Its a fantastic modeler. I ended up buying the Ruby 63 as well, but rarely use it. Not really my cup of tea, but every now and then its nice to dial in that chimey clean tone AC's are amazing at. I do like how the Woodrow is still in that Fender clean ballpark, but with more mids
The Woodrow is unlike any other pedal I have tried. Really fun and very unique tones. But it can always do a solid clean tone as well. Cheers!
Damnit now I want one lol! Sweet tone! Nice Playing as well! Worth a sub..
Awesome thanks for watching!
First time watching your channel! Great video and great playing, subscribed!
Awesome, thank you for watching. More to come!
I’m really looking forward to this. I can understand the love/hate relationship with it. There are a lot of sounds in it that I don’t like, BUT I’ve found some sounds that I do like. Driving it I can get a cool old school Muddy Waters Rollin’ Stone kind of a sound, and combing with my Flint and Deco, I can get some really cool sounds from early Blue Note to rockabilly. I don’t really crank the gain on it, so I’m curious if I can get some ideas from you for other tones. My favorite speaker sim is the standard one actually. It sounds great when turning up the tone knob.
i have had to work more on this pedal to get desirable tones on this pedal than almost all other pedals combined. That being said, the tones I did achieve were very good. I loved the first speaker sim as well, the celestion blue. Is that the one you are talking about?
@@SuperdangerStudios I like the Blue and stock Jensen speakers the best. For the bonus cabs, I think I like the Bassman best, but mostly stick to the Blue and stock Jensen.
I never had an amplifier pedal that could get an exciting rude mood. The Woodrow is scary expressive and responsive to volume control. Great playing!
Thanks for watching! The Woodrow is a really interesting pedal. Nothing like it out there. Cheers!
I started running it through my 78 Princeton reverb and it's absolute gold with my tele!
Excellent man! Sounds like a good setup
Great video mate, this Woodrow has some magic to it, and it's own thing, and I think it's worth a lot.
It’s a fantastic pedal. Really fun to use but not as intuitive as I thought it was going to be.
@@SuperdangerStudios Bad news though - I have one on the way and this is entirely because of you. So you gifted me hours to fiddle with it now, but it seems to be all worth it. Cheers mate, love ur vids!
@@wouldoox8024 haha great to hear! You're gonna love it. Let me know how it goes!
@@SuperdangerStudios Woodrow in da house today boy, this shit is massive haha. I played it briefly now and i really like it! It does great great edge of breakup, great fuzz (what a WILD tone).
On top of that I was looking for Gary Clark Jr. Tone for some time now, and it is dead simple now where he got it from. No need of pedals or anything. This thing growl, I like it a lot.
Also when set it at max fuzz - it is nice to toy around with guitar volume pot to do some crazy swells. Try it out :D.
Thanks mate! It was worth it, i got it mint way cheaper - I guess not everyone likes it.
I really enjoyed the video. The only thing I would say is that while I would agree with most of what you say, I’ve found the speakers really depend on the guitar you are using. I’m playing a lot with a 1979-80 Yamaha SG800 these days and find the stock Jensen speaker actually suits it best for most applications, perhaps because that guitar is so thick sounding (I thick Frusciante described the Yamaha SGs as having almost an organ tone).
I also agree it can be a frustrating pedal, and if it wasn’t so pricey I probably wouldn’t have spent the time to try to find good sounds on it. I also agree that I wish they had given us more options for the room.
You're right re: the speakers. Between my SC245 and my tele, the speakers react really differently. Still a great pedal even with it's quirkiness!
Your videos are super high level!
Really kind of you to say! Thanks dude.
This is by far the best analysis I’ve seen of this pedal. I get what you are saying about the ‘fizziness’ of the sound. I’m trying to dial in a Neil Young type sound and all I can hear is the artificial fizz sound. It’s actually quite annoying. It’s all I can hear now. I’m not sure about the pedal now. It sort of sounds amazing but I can’t seem to find a sound I’m happy with it.. And I totally agree with what you said about the ‘room’ knob. What’s the point of it ? I would rather they offered a proper reverb option or a selection of ‘room’ types. Another thing, I think the pedal heavily compresses your input signal. When I run a reverb pedal at a very low level before the Woodrow, it’s super loud from the get go which leads me to believe that there is an in-built compressor ratcheting up the signal; the more drive you dial in, the more compressed the input signal is, which is not how a 5E3 (or at least my 5E3) behaves. Sure the reverb gets louder but it’s not the entire sound. Q - were you running your reverb before or after the pedal in the recording ?
One thing that really helped w the fizz is using a third party IR instead of the built in speakers. Other people gripe that it's not as authentic but what matters most is if you like it! I really like the York Audio ones obviously. But lots of great ones out there. I was also running reverb after the Woodrow. I think you're right, there's a comp in front of the Woodrow but I think it might be in all the UAFX pedals. Cheers!
EVERY other review of this pedal, or the Dream, or the Marshall one, EVERY ONE of them, aside from this one, has an enormous gulf of volume between the spoken parts and the playing parts. Thank you for being the first and only guy to not do that. Everybody doing every guitar video from now on, take a dadgum note: keep the volume consistent.
Thank you! Gotta make sure the guitar is ripping!
Great intro!
Thank you! Gotta keep it entertaining!
This is such a great video and I agree with the points raised. We all know that UA make some fantastic gear, and I think their developers must be some of the best in the business. I do have issues with UA though and they really frustrate me. I have issue with what they put in, and what they leave out of their gear. At some point, and I don’t think I am alone with this opinion, I’m going to say, you know what, you might be the best at what you do, but this other piece of gear gives me x, y and z and you’ve only given me x, so I’m now going with the other company. I think UA are resting on their laurels somewhat, and due to how they position their gear in the marketplace, in my opinion, for maximum profit, they are beginning to frustrate their customers. Nothing wrong with companies making a profit, but there comes a point where it begins to look like they are milking it. Another gripe from me, support your existing products. Look at the Ox, one firmware release since launch (or one that their customers wanted). Compare that to the Helix. Point made.
I love the pedigree of UA and the pedals really are first class. But like you, sometimes I am confused by their product decisions and what they decide to include or exclude. All that being said, still an amazing company with top tier products. That is interesting about the Ox though. So many people use it, would make sense to keep people buying it through small consistent updates.
@@SuperdangerStudios agreed, nothing fundamentally wrong with the Ox, it’s hands down the best bit of kit I’ve ever bought, but a few more effects wouldn’t be too much to ask. Keep doing what you are doing. Your videos are top notch.
Hey man! Thanks for these incredible reviews of the new uad pedals, great playing also 🙏🏻
Did you notice that sort of digital clipping (dunno how to call it) on all uad pedals? I use iridium but recently grabbed dream65 for a test - great dynamics and feel overall but that fizz/clipping on the breakup and overdriven tones drives me nuts! At first i thought that dream 65 had an issue but after listening tons of vids I now think that clipping is everywhere (dream, wooddraw, ruby)
Yes I am aware of it! That crackle or clipping is part of the authentic sound of the amps I am told. Every time I bring it up I get comments saying “ITS AUTHENTIC” to which I respond, “I dont care it doesn’t sound good!” haha.
There are ways around it but it is there on all settings.
As usual, a GREAT Video Alex!
I definitely love the Woodrow '55, but I'm torn between it and a Dream '65. I'm a Songwriter/Singer who plays drums, bass guitar, keyboards, and now I'm an admittedly novice Stratocaster player as well :)
My genres are Pop/R&B/New Country/Jazz/Funk, and either the Dream or Woodrow will be the only "amp" I have, which in turn will go directly into my UAD Apollo. If it's relevant, I have a pedalboard that has a StroboStomp HD, a Wampler Ego V2, an Archer iKon, a MXR Chorus, a Supro Tremolo (which I will sell if I go with the Dream), and a Keeley Halo.
Well, that's the wind-up and the pitch Alex, so what's you valued suggestion?
Thanks so much for watching!. Sounds like you have a great setup. I would recommend the dream over the Woodrow bc it’s much easier to get a wide variety of sounds for your genre. Also I wouldn’t get rid of your tremolo pedal just get as the tremolo functionality on the dream is hidden behind the alternate knobs and it can be tricky to manage at times.
The Dream handles overdrive and modulation just a bit better in my opinion and the spring reverb is perfect on it.
Hope this helps!. Let me know how it goes! Cheers,
Alex
Appreciate the walkthrough and great playing.
I’m actually hoping this captures the recorded sound of a 5E3 through a Blue from the “The Drop” by the Spin Doctors.
Regarding the rants: I’m curious if the latency is simulated “sag” but assuming you can tell the difference. And to your Simpson reference, if Santiago didn’t give us the cone cry we’d complain about “something missing”.
Wow! Thanks so much for the super thanks. And yes, the drop is a great track. It can get that tone for sure but it might need some eq and room added in post to get it exactly like it. And you’re right the sag was playing a factor but I didn’t know when the latency stopped and the sag started. Either way, it’s noticeable but not a deal breaker. Agree w the cone cry but I’d love to be able to turn it off in the options! Thanks again!
style of playing is so fabulously laid back and expressive, Ry Cooder style maybe, that loop at 38 is sublime
Thanks so much! What a generous compliment. This pedal was a blast to play. It brought out a lot of musical ideas in me. Cheers!
@@SuperdangerStudios you're welcome. Do you think the Tonex could get such a tone? I'm really after a spectrum of fender type tones.
When you speak make this video interested. Cant wait this UAFX DEMO 👍
Great! Hope you liked it!
UA if you are watching, my wish for an update would be for you to give us the Strymon Iridium trick for the reverb and let us hold both switches down and turn the knob to change between a few room sounds (ideally from your modeling of famous studios, although anything would be appreciated). The reason I want it this way and not with the app is that I’m worried that over time if app development is discontinued we will lose access to all of those features.
I bet you could increase sales with more usable reverb. FWIW, I wouldn’t mind a few different spring reverb settings on the Dream as well since we don’t have control over the reverb parameters, but it’s a much more essential upgrade for the Woodrow IMO.
Agreed!
The best pedal on the market for me🧡
It’s a good one for sure! Do you use it live ever?
@@SuperdangerStudios oh no, I have 4 UAFX pedals and the only one usable live is the Galaxy. I mainly use it for recording and working at home.
Can't Wait!!!
Me either! I lose my mind in the video haha.
Another great video. Hope you made your test with the UAFX output in stereo? Sound is bigger and wider. 2 algorithm are used. One for each output.
I did not know that. I did this all in mono, but I'll do a video on the stereo capabilities soon. Thanks for the info!
Question for ya: Have you put a treble booster like a Rangemaster in front of any O these amp pedals? I'm especially interested in how the Iridium responds. I believe in one of your other videos you stated that the Woodrow did not respond well to external drives n boosts?. I just sprang for an Iridium so I'll find out when it gets here. Pretty sure I saw some vids about the Iridium doing well with drives but I don't recall treble boost being mentioned.
I don’t actually own a treble boost style pedal. Only an Octavia, a jordan fuzz, and a Mythos Golden Fleece. IMO the iridium takes fuzz well but usually when it’s stacked with an OD.
I was checking out this video again and thought it was worth mentioning that some of the artist and factory presets have a completely different reverb algorithm. Larger, wider, etc.
So I tend think of my starting point as a particular preset’s reverb and tweak the amp and cab from there.
I saw that, and then I saw the ox stomp came out. Solves the problem in a diff way too. But not sure if I wanna fork out $400 for speaker sims.
You play with spirit, I have the pedal it is awesome
Thank you! It’s a great pedal!
Nice tune and great playing..
Thanks so much!
It's driving me nuts that nobody has put out a 1963 Vibroverb sim. My favorite amp of all time and they cost at least $10000 haha. Thanks for the video!
Oh man that’d be so cool to have a great sim. I think Origin Effects Revival Drive can get a little bit close with a good IR. But yeah, nothing really centered on that sound. Thanks for watching!
Hello :) I'm new to guitar and gear for it and I'm confused. Would this work with an amp like Boss katana 50? or does it need a different type of speaker? The sound @ 8:05 made me want one so bad :)) great play
This is an amp simulation pedal so you’d go out of the Woodrow pedal into the power amp input on the back of the boss katana. It would sound really good but the speaker on the boss katana is much more low end than a typical tweed.
@@SuperdangerStudios thank you
You stated that the "sound in the room" is what we're chasing, which is sadly only something a guitarist is ever going to hear. I bought the UA Ruby and also found this to be true. It's a great sound and as close to a real AC30 as you'll likely ever get without an AC30. But I tried to gig the Ruby through monitors. There's just something the mic'd sound can't capture. The attack and energy of the amp pushing the real guitar speakers in the room with you. So, I have my AC15 behind me, and the Ruby is what the audience hears through the FOH. This way, I get both, don't have to worry about mics, and I can dial more Ruby in my monitor if the AC15 isn't enough volume for the venue.
Dude that's a great setup! I gotta try that sometime. Best of both worlds!
Could the room effect on this pedal be achieved with just a slapback echo? It sounds pretty similar to my dd-3 with a short delay. Thanks for the great vid.
Absolutely! A good inverse slap is really similar to a bright room!
How is your reverb setting on Valhalla? Sounds perfect nice!
Thanks! I use the large room setting on a bus around 30%. and sometimes i use a studio A preset in parallel as well.
I love these pedals. I think UA nailed it on all four. I don’t perform on stage and not sure I would like it live. For recording they are very cool and sound fantastic. IMO
Totally agree!
Is it possible to use the woodrow as a amp/cab sim after my tube preamp pedal and go straight in the PA? As a travel-friedly guitar rig solution?
Absolutely. It takes pedals at low gain really well and sounds great out of a FRFR speaker/ PA.
I use it clean mostly for stereo fx. Sometimes as a wet dry wet with my Princeton as the centre. Works great for that.
Great setup! Sounds like an awesome combo w the Princeton
I use my ruby with a line 6 Powercab 112+. Sounds amazing and I get that room sound I’M looking for.
That is a great idea. I should look into that. How is the speaker on the powercab?
I hooked mine to a Headrush 108. It sounds great
Does it feel like you are playing an amp or an Overdrive/Fuzz? Really interested in this pedal but I don't know much how I'd use those flubbier fuzzy sounds. I also don't know why they didn't make a Marshall Super Lead or JCM pedal. Would have been the perfect 4th pedal for the lineup.
They gotta have a Marshall style pedal in the works right now. Right? Also I’d say this pedal feels like an amp at low gain and like a fuzz at higher. But that’s how I interpret it. I think the Dream feels like an amp all around.
@@SuperdangerStudios Thanks, that answers my question. The Woodrow is cool, but I think a Marshall style- UA pedal would be way more useful if done correctly. So, I am holding out hope! The idea of having a 55' Tweed in a box seems awesome, but its just not versatile enough I think.
The pedal sounds amazing, but does it work well with the cab sim off, with a real power amp and cab? Great playing Alex, congrats!
The Woodrow does sound really good. I haven't tried it w a poweramp. Don't own one get and would want to do extensive research before promoting it but I will say that it sounded great Infront of my blues jr set to really flat and that kind of approximates a clean poweramp. Sorry I don't have more insight!
@@SuperdangerStudios thank you man!
Yeah, I don't understand the point of the room knob on really any amp modeler, whether it's the uafx, iridium, whatever unit has it. Never found a use for it, and it doesn't make it feel any more like an amp in a room.
As for UA modeling the speaker crackle and stuff, I actually kinda like it. The uafx amps are very much the good, the bad, and the ugly from their real amp counterparts. The iridium may be more polished, but it's missing some of that raw sound from the uafx pedals.
Right? What's the deal w the room? And I do like the crackle here and there, but I wish there was an option to turn it off as well. Since it's digital, should be pretty straightforward. Maybe a firmware update in the future? haha who knows. Cheers!
I'm trying to search for someone that has run one of these UAFX pedals using the '4 cable method' into a Marshall combo via the FXloop. It would be great if my DSL20 had a clean fender channel. (fyi, I have a Vintage 30 speaker in my combo). Unsure what the poweramp in the marshall would do to the Woodrow tone though.
Yeah i haven't seen many people use the uafx pedals that way. And to be honest, I am sure it sounds good bc I was running them into the front of my amp the other day (minus the speaker sim) and it sounded great. Ruby, Dream, and Woodrow all sounded great and imparted the unique tones of the pedals no problem.
As musicians, we all have to play the room whether practicing, performing, or live recording- a lot for just for how it feels to us while playing perhaps. We all know that feeling of "how's the room? Sound-good for hearing yourself and the band?" There can be overwhelming variables that are then stacked on top of way too many choices to shape the tone we're hearing in our heads. In the end, if given a $50 guitar and a $20 amp, we still have quickly set aside the quality or our personal biases towards the gear), play well, and sound great especially in front of an audience. It's not always a pleasant experience but, any chance to play music is always good for the soul.
Agreed! Thanks for watching!
My absolute pleasure!@@SuperdangerStudios
So you think this preamp could be used as a clean sound amp for pedal platform? A lot of demo video are focused on more over driven sound.
I think the dream is a much better option for a pedal platform. The woodrow is awesome but I don’t think it’s best used as a pedal platform.
Love the crackle.
It’s starting to grow on me too
The pedal sounds great but damn, that Tele is beautiful!
One of my favorite guitars.
@@SuperdangerStudios it’s one of my favourites too! Wish it was mine, lol!
I have to qualify your comment at 31:20 about the interactive volume controls. The actual 5e3 volumes and tone are linked before the phase inverter. Plug into the bright channel WITHOUT using a jumper, then turn up the unused normal volume around 3 o'clock to 5 o'clock. Flabby bass energy is shunted to ground. You will hear a much better edge-of-breakup than just bright volume at 2-3 is. Heavy grit is reduced--much smoother, more responsive to the energy you put into the strings. Woodrow won't do that. And unfortunately, that's the best part of a 5e3. And alo why it's not on boards.
Ah that makes sense. Thanks for sharing!
Can you tell me what pickups you have in your tele?
Yes! I have Lollar imperial in the neck and a Lollar special t in the bridge! Here is a video I did on it. Cheers!
ua-cam.com/video/FJbNF_hYrzk/v-deo.html
It took almost half the processor power to do that one amazing room convolution. It sounds pretty real to me.
Is the latency just with the Woodrow? I haven't notice anything odd with the Dream pedal.
I feel it with all of them but it’s not significant in any meaningful way. But I think the sag was pronouncing the effect as well. Still amazing pedals though.
@@SuperdangerStudios If you can feel it it is because it affects your emotions while playing. BTW you play wonderful.
@@mofateam1 Thanks so much! You're right. I suppose it will affect your playing to a degree but anything less than 20ms I usually adjust to and forget about.
Your videos really are the best. When I see you reviewing a product, I know that it will be the most in depth video that exists based on real experience. Clone yourself so you have more time to review things please.
Haha I wish I could put out these caliber of videos more often. Just a ton that goes into it. I’m working on a solution to that though.
Thanks!
Wow thanks for the tip my man!
You sound amazing playing through a tweed style amp. Every pro player eventually learns it’s all about the mids and dynamic attack. Then effect’s maybe before or after the amp.
I really want one! I tried the Mesa Cali too. Loved it but I want to see what this Vintage Sound Tweed 15 sounds like. And I agree, the room sound can be captured but it is really hard to capture the energy of what you hear when you're standing in front of it.
@@SuperdangerStudios any vintage tweed style amp will cut with a close mic. You can mix a room sound from your VO mic.
Strymon pedals are great but the iridium and amp sims are pathetic compared to the dynamics and response of a real tube amp. Your blues Jr is just a taste of real amp goodness. Get a real amp please!
@@TimMilliken haha I have had too many amps to count but got rid of all of them except for the blues Jr bc it just wasn’t practical. The one I miss the most is my 64 Bassman. Cannot believe I sold that one. Ah well. Once it makes sense again I’m going back in with a tweed. And then maybe a Vox style amp.
@@SuperdangerStudios your fellow UA-camr Jack Fosset also said his tweed Bassman was the best sounding amp he ever played. The Mesa Cali does that 40 watt 4 6v6 thing too with a nice verb although I don’t really like their speaker choice. I still rock a $200 super champ xd for a bunch of gigs because it’s so convenient to carry and sounds like a tube Bassman on the normal channel.
I actually want some of the crackle.
That’s what I miss on the ACS1 which smooths out the sound too much. The ACS1 attenuates stuff above 10kHz WITHOUT the IRs engaged. Which is fine for some cleans and low gain stuff, but really dampens higher gain distortions too much when compared to my real amp
I hear ya. I just want the option to turn it off in certain situations. It is definitely authentic though.
@@SuperdangerStudios fair enough, I wish they had a low pass filter to kill it if needed
@@ZachariahConnor Ah good idea. Again, since it's digital I figure they would be patching with firmware updates for most requested features.
I think the crackle is high frequency content. Some IR’s will remove it. UA speaker sims have higher frequency response.
Ah interesting. You’re right re: third party IR too. York Audio IRs sound really good through it.
I swear the whole UAFX line up is great sounding pedals with the stupidest feature set they could have chosen.
Your videos got me interested in the Strymon Iridium again and I feel it's just so much better as a practical digital pedal. Just throw in some nicer IRs. The UA stuff sounds more realistic but that "warts and all" approach just has undesirables that would be nice to be able to dial out on a digital unit.
It is very interesting. Bc I love the sound of these UA pedals almost all the time, but the times I don't I really don't. I understand chasing the realism but I would just love the option to turn any of the realism off as well.
Cheers!
Thank you. I HATE that frying bacon crackle that a lot of sims have. It's probably accurate in a way I guess, but it's what I always tried to get rid of in the studio.
Right? I get that it's authentic but would love the option to turn it off.
May i ask what is this nice telecaster ?
Hi Stephen! I actually did a video on it here: ua-cam.com/video/FJbNF_hYrzk/v-deo.html
Its a former Fender 52 RI, but with a warmoth neck and lollar pickups!
I love the Catalinbread Foundation Overdrives.Easier on the price, yet still great.
I actually am getting the formula 55 this week! Can’t wait to try it out!
For the price of this you could have an IK tonex pedal that does a more accurate model of a bassman, the other amps UAD makes you purchase a separate DSP pedal for, or any other amp or speaker under the sun (plus reverb, EQ, compression...)
That’s true! The tonex wasn’t available when I bought this. I use amplitube as well and am familiar w their tone/algorithm and I think they both do a great job. And yes it’s probably cheaper to just have a tonex but where’s the fun in that? Haha
What's the song at 17:19? Really nice.
That was just a little improv based on some old church hymns. Glad you enjoyed it!
@@SuperdangerStudios yeah. Great gospel chord movements. I'm digging it. 😎
I really wish they had added a headphone jack. I realize, I can use it with my interface and use that headphone, but itd be nice to be able to just use the pedal like the Iridium.
Agreed!
Room is there to give the feeling of 50's records. The records were recorded live and the whole band was in the same room. So it's not what they could have done, it is there because they wanted it to sound like guitars in 50's records.
Get a Mesa California tweed and UAD ox for your room sound.
what i noticed with the latency is that I can hear the string sound acoustically and when I play a real amp, I can't.
Right! Me too!
What’s the song at 8 min?
Just me messing around. Kind of sounded like Old Love by Clapton now that i listened back.
I'm tired of hearing all of the critical feedback about this pedal. Frankly, it's an awesome pedal. All Fender amps are geared toward clean and low-gain sounds, so why is the expectation somehow different for this than the Dream? Sure, Neil Young likes to crank them, but that's not a very common sound in general.
I use this to make a perfect 2-channel Fender with a fat bluesy low-gain Blonde Bassman tone (like McCready on Yellow Ledbetter) on one channel and punchy bright Brown Vibrolux clean (like Knopfler on Sultans) on the other. I run a RevivalTrem into it for the gain, and it's an awesome pairing. Sounds far more like a real amp than the Iridium even with the YA IRs. Don't get me wrong, the Iridium is great at sounding like a pedal that sounds like an amp, but the Woodrow just sounds like an amp.
So people just need to be clear on what they're looking for. If you want the scooped, tight negative feedback clean sound, get the Dream. If you want a rounder, bluesier, more saggy and organic clean sound, get the Woodrow.
Exactly. I think people were confused on what they were trying to get. I think the pedal sounds better into an amp than on its on DI. But it provides an amazing tweed experience. Lots of tones to unearth on it. Cheers!
I want to want that pedal, but im so concerned I won't like it. I'm not a fuzz guy at all. But I really want THAT vintage clean tone. For overdrives, I have a Wampler Pantheon Deluxe. Gives me plenty of drives you tweak.
For sure! It’s a very specific pedal w a very specific sound. You might like the Dream or Iridium better!
I have a feeling that the empty cab slot on the UAFX pedals, and the inability to load your own IR, is in anticipation of the release of an Ox pedal. Leave it empty so the amp pedals can interface with the Ox pedal. Just seems like a very UAD thing to do. As good as their gear is, they are run by accountants and marketing people as much as engineers and designers.
Ah very interesting! I think a Marshall amp pedal and a Bass amp pedal is on the way.
ha! you nailed it
Hi, Great great demo! Does anybody have experience with Woodrow and Les Pauls? Can’t find much demos online.
Thanks for watching! And you're right. Not really any videos w a humbucker. I'll make a quick one!
Great:) curious about your thoughts. Also, I’m wandering if you can get close to a JTM 45 sound with a Woodrow and perhaps a Marshally IR.
@@krzysztofbasinski915 I'll do it!
I look forward to seeing you memorial day
Please bring the Woodrow
Will do. Might have to leave earlier than expected to beat traffic but I'll see you there!
That crackle is EXACTLY what my '62 Deluxe does, it`s just the way these old amps start to overdrive at a certain volume.
Yeah I am not doubting that it's authentic, just wondering why that is included. Would love to be able to turn it off. That's all.
62? Is that a 6g3 deluxe?
The crackle is what makes it sound real tho.
When’s the UAFX Lion video coming??❤
Dude I wish I had it right now! I’m reaching out to everyone i know to see if I can get my hands on it.
@@SuperdangerStudios awesome! Good luck! Can’t wait to see a nice long video from you
37:00 so toneful!