I'm excited! I'll buy/build a whole new computer for it to live on. Or rent/build a server for it if I have too. I've been waiting for this breakthrough go a very long time now.
@@SweatyHatMan I think it's a difficult question. On the one hand, handing the model over keeps with the spirit of "open". On the other hand, given the size of the model, it's not as if a normal person will have the hardware to even run the model. Releasing it behind an API is pretty clever and might make the model more universally accessible than if they had merely uploaded the billions of parameter values. Also these researchers aren't working for free--in fact, they command top salaries--so I don't think it's unreasonable that the company try to monetize their work. How else could they keep the lights on? This system is not perfect, of course, but it seems like they've thought it through and made reasonable trade-off decisions.
I've had the idea to use the terminal as an API for voice input for awhile now, since you can do nearly everything with the terminal. You wouldn't necessarily need GPT-3, one could just hard-code the phrases you want to use. It's a bit tedious though. I'm excited to use GPT-3 someday. I hope the API is easy enough for beginners to figure out and not too costly.
The use of the AI in terminal was incredible - but I'd be worried it'd fuck up and kill my computer. For example if you ask it zip a folder but it misinterprets it and does it at the top level of the drive - which could be a nightmare. Very cool stuff though! Definitely be interesting to see how it will be used in the future.
That's a great question. I assumed it was using the API to pull structured information from the internet, similar to the wikipedia example, but that was an assumption. After reviewing the source video again, it sounds like it might come from the generation capability of the API itself. I have a lot of questions about how they've operationalized this language model into intelligent applications.
I feel like all this stuff could have easily enough been programmed to "seem" like it's an AI to the untrained person, or been done with simple video cuts. I'll believe it when I see it.
You don't believe OpenAI? They legit have teamed up with Microsoft, are owned by Elon Musk, are nonprofit, and have made a slightly worse model last year called GPT-2 which still expresses good (maybe not so good) general intelligence.
The problem is that it consumed way more data than a human would to achieve the same performance. Until we can make AI more data efficient, we will not be creating AGI.
I'm excited! I'll buy/build a whole new computer for it to live on. Or rent/build a server for it if I have too. I've been waiting for this breakthrough go a very long time now.
No need! It’s just an API you can call. Not sure what it takes to get on-boarded, but they do have a waiting list you can sign up for.
too expensive, only corporations can afford it by now
@ How much does it cost?
Disappointing. A company shouldn't call itself "OpenAI" if it's not open source
@@SweatyHatMan I think it's a difficult question. On the one hand, handing the model over keeps with the spirit of "open". On the other hand, given the size of the model, it's not as if a normal person will have the hardware to even run the model. Releasing it behind an API is pretty clever and might make the model more universally accessible than if they had merely uploaded the billions of parameter values. Also these researchers aren't working for free--in fact, they command top salaries--so I don't think it's unreasonable that the company try to monetize their work. How else could they keep the lights on? This system is not perfect, of course, but it seems like they've thought it through and made reasonable trade-off decisions.
First to join with the AI Overlords...
Sooooo... impressive and exciting!
Where can I download this API? is it aviable to the general public? I mean, it´s a "OpenAI" thing
Read open as 'closed'
Just wow, the future of ai is in ai itself now, behold the gpt 4 made by 3!
I've had the idea to use the terminal as an API for voice input for awhile now, since you can do nearly everything with the terminal.
You wouldn't necessarily need GPT-3, one could just hard-code the phrases you want to use. It's a bit tedious though.
I'm excited to use GPT-3 someday. I hope the API is easy enough for beginners to figure out and not too costly.
Sometimes understanding how to ask the right questions is more important than achieving the answer yourself.
This is Jarvis, just needs the text to speech to make it slower
The use of the AI in terminal was incredible - but I'd be worried it'd fuck up and kill my computer.
For example if you ask it zip a folder but it misinterprets it and does it at the top level of the drive - which could be a nightmare.
Very cool stuff though! Definitely be interesting to see how it will be used in the future.
i remember 40 years ago, there was small program on unix o/s computer you could just converse with it thru terminal on simple things.
That's very impressing... The playground shown in the video isn't public I suppose ?
You can be put on the wait list from their website.
Amazing
welcomeAIOverlords's wet dream
For the Excel demo, is the generated table data comes from the GPT-3 model? or a separate database?
That's a great question. I assumed it was using the API to pull structured information from the internet, similar to the wikipedia example, but that was an assumption. After reviewing the source video again, it sounds like it might come from the generation capability of the API itself. I have a lot of questions about how they've operationalized this language model into intelligent applications.
In the mean time HuggingFace are training new state of the art models and makes them opensource.
I feel like all this stuff could have easily enough been programmed to "seem" like it's an AI to the untrained person, or been done with simple video cuts. I'll believe it when I see it.
You don't believe OpenAI? They legit have teamed up with Microsoft, are owned by Elon Musk, are nonprofit, and have made a slightly worse model last year called GPT-2 which still expresses good (maybe not so good) general intelligence.
@@Lumegrin is this video made by openAI though? No. It isn't. It's made by some other random person
@@Lumegrin OpenAI is not owned by Elon
I like your skepticism, you can play with dungeon AI which is a working demo, but yeah, here are they only showcasing the best case scenarios
like kreijstal said check out AI dungeon
It's rather dreadful.
What do you mean ?
It is good enough for a lot of code-completion tasks though.
3:02 I am having trouble figuring out how to setup this Tabulate thing on windows
Amazing works
where is nurse chappels voice in all of this?
damn, if that's not an artificial general intelligence... it will be soon
The problem is that it consumed way more data than a human would to achieve the same performance. Until we can make AI more data efficient, we will not be creating AGI.