How Does Every U.S. Military Branch Solve Crimes?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • Thanks to Conflict of Nations for sponsoring this video - Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/cwacnyum Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!
    The U.S. government has a set of federal law enforcement agencies that conduct investigations on offenses dealing with all of its military branches. These agencies are the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), Army Criminal Investigation Division (Army CID), Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS), and the smaller Marine Corps Criminal Investigation Division (Marine CID).
    These military law enforcement agencies fit perfectly in between the civilian and military law enforcement worlds to enforce and investigate major crimes and offenses with any connection to the Department of Defense. These agencies all have special agents with arresting powers that are either civilian or active duty military.
    But why does the United States have these military law enforcement agencies? What exactly do they do? Why do we even need them? And most importantly, what separates them from the rest of the numerous law enforcement agencies throughout the United States? If you’re interested in learning more about these military law enforcement agencies, watch this video!
    Federal, State, and Local Police Explained Video: • WHY ARE THERE SO MANY ...
    PATREON: / generaldischarge
    Help us reach 5,000 Followers on Twitter: / gendischarge
    Join our Discord Server: / discord
    GENERAL DISCHARGE WEBSITE: gendischarge.com
    LINKTREE: linktr.ee/generaldischarge
    Amazon Gear List:
    Microphone: amzn.to/3Ew4Fof
    Camera: amzn.to/3RRc7xg
    General Discharge Fuel: amzn.to/3oX3UiS
    Our Editor’s Fuel: amzn.to/3qNxcRh
    Rite in the Rain: amzn.to/3Cv9GLu
    Sunglasses: amzn.to/43Xw7Vp
    For business inquiries ONLY, we may be reached at: business.generaldischarge@gmail.com
    Beats we commonly use are produced by Pleur Beats and Nnovad.
    DISCLAIMER: Links included in this description may be affiliate links. If you purchase a product with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you. Thank you for your support!
    0:00 Introduction
    1:33 Overview
    4:52 NCIS
    7:06 Army CID
    9:33 Air Force OSI
    12:18 Marine CID
    13:39 CGIS

КОМЕНТАРІ • 450

  • @GeneralDischarge
    @GeneralDischarge  10 місяців тому +20

    Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days! Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/cwacnyum
    Who here knew about all of these military law enforcement agencies before this video?
    PATREON: patreon.com/generaldischarge
    Help us reach 5,000 Followers on Twitter: twitter.com/gendischarge
    Join our Discord Server: discord.gg/8ktqEWHp48
    LINKTREE: linktr.ee/generaldischarge

    • @SayNoToDemocide1
      @SayNoToDemocide1 10 місяців тому +1

      Please do Army Counterintelligence next!

    • @bs3x
      @bs3x 10 місяців тому

      You were wrong as you didn't list all military criminal investigative agencies (even if you were just listing those with "Special Agents"). You seemed to conveniently forget the Special Agents of U.S. Army Counterintelligence (ACI) who have the *exclusive* jurisdiction in the investigation of national security crimes within the U.S. Army (over Army CID). This includes (but is not limited to) investigations of the crimes of espionage, sedition, subversion/mutiny, treason, and international terrorism. ACI Special Agents have the same arrest powers and geographic jurisdiction as Army CID. ACI agents also regularly attend CITP at FLETC (and is a partner organization same as CID, NCIS, and OSI), but first all agents attend training at the U.S. Army Counterintelligence Special Agents Course (CISAC) at Ft. Huachuca, AZ. ACI agents also regularly attend numerous advanced courses at the Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy (JCITA) alongside its partner agents in NCIS and OSI. Bottom line, you messed up by not including them which seems to be deliberate considering you mentioned Army CID doesn't have counterintelligence responsibility, indicating you were either already aware, or have learned (via research) what ACI is. They are considered by many to be the premiere counterintelligence org within the DoD, and ACI Command (ACIC) has the largest number of Special Agents dedicated exclusively to counterintelligence in the federal government. Given the prestigious history of ACI (via the Army CI Corps or CIC), especially during WWII, it's quite the disservice to not even give them an honorable mention (although a whole video itself should be dedicated to them).

    • @V.B.Squire
      @V.B.Squire 10 місяців тому

      Keep an eye on marine CID the corps disbanded the LE battalions so their will be A LOT of work to take over and a big change for them

    • @DinoCommando123
      @DinoCommando123 10 місяців тому

      Can you do a video about Trinidad and Tobago special forces

    • @taxibaanyoutube9156
      @taxibaanyoutube9156 10 місяців тому +1

      I did not know that NCIS was a real thing

  • @CS-wi1tc
    @CS-wi1tc 10 місяців тому +123

    Many years ago, while serving at CRC 2ID, there was a Korean national lady who was murdered just outside post in a bar. The Lucky Club. They knew it was a service member but not who. CID had every battalion do a stripped down inspection of all soldiers of every rank, male and female.
    All soldiers who were found to have any marks of any kind were set aside after having gotten redressed. They were then marched to CID and questioned, shown pictures of the crime scene, finger printed, etc.
    I don't think it included Camp Casey but they eventually found the guy within like a month if i remember right.
    That was a whole different experience.

    • @jacobkooistra5143
      @jacobkooistra5143 10 місяців тому +1

      CID a bunch of narcs and party poopers. locked a bunch of my boys up. pressed me to told em to piss off

    • @rezatravellers8699
      @rezatravellers8699 10 місяців тому +24

      ​@@jacobkooistra5143serves you right maybe

    • @longiusaescius2537
      @longiusaescius2537 10 місяців тому

      @CS-wi1tc did he get capital?

    • @CS-wi1tc
      @CS-wi1tc 10 місяців тому +6

      @@longiusaescius2537 I don't know. I had barely left just after they caught him.

    • @longiusaescius2537
      @longiusaescius2537 10 місяців тому +2

      @@CS-wi1tc unfortunately it's common for them to get "life" (20 years at most and then we'll release you)

  • @azcountry6064
    @azcountry6064 10 місяців тому +125

    "Do What Must Be Done” Brothers. Retired Army CID. Glad to hear they are going 1811.

    • @adamcuneo7189
      @adamcuneo7189 10 місяців тому +4

      Thank you so much for your service sir, when you were in CID, were agents military or civilian? Also, does CID fight the enemy in combat zones?

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +17

      @@adamcuneo7189 CID has both military and civilian special agents. Special Agents deploy to combat zones to conduct criminal investigations but do not necessarily “fight the enemy”

    • @ajameslee
      @ajameslee 10 місяців тому +3

      Yep, the plan is 100% not the 60/40 as earlier expected. About to retire myself.

    • @herobrine9866
      @herobrine9866 10 місяців тому

      ​@@ajamesleeHey is there any tips you have for a civilian security guard / bouncer trying to get into the CID? Any networking advice or application advice would be appreciated.

    • @soonerfrac4611
      @soonerfrac4611 10 місяців тому

      Spent my time as an MP but eventually went to DACP. At the academy a retired agent was attending the course. He said at forensics class he said the lady who did the examination of Monica’s blue dress. Apparently part of the hazing of new agents was to get them to ask her about it. Apparently Bill’s was not the only donor on the dress.

  • @redwolfexr
    @redwolfexr 9 місяців тому +40

    One important point - at least for Army CID. The active duty agents (always NCOs) cannot arrest civilians, but every office also has civilian agents who can. That is how they work around Posse Comitatus. The authority vested in the active duty investigators is very similar to that of a MP. So they tend to stick to on-base investigations. (on base they have authority to detain civilians, but not to arrest)
    Off base investigation is almost always the civilian side of the office.

    • @johnhuffman5973
      @johnhuffman5973 9 місяців тому +2

      So, a couple things
      1.) Active duty agents are not only NCO’S. A large contingent of DACID are Warrant Officers serving as special agents.
      2.) The investigative authority vested in DACID Special Agents is categorically different than that vested in military police. MP’s are granted their authority by the garrison commander (and provost marshal) of the installation they serve on - meaning - they have no legal authority outside of the confines of their assigned installation or various training/housing areas. MP’s are not legally considered to be federal agents. DACID agents are sworn Federal Agents granted their authority by Federal Law (10 USC) and are granted apprehension/arrest authority regardless of their physical location (both on and off of installations) regardless of where they are permanently stationed.
      3.) DACID is incredibly active (both on the active duty side and the civilian side) regarding off-post investigations. DACID’s investigative purview covers all investigations wherein there is an Army nexus, to include the any and all felony level investigations wherein a soldier is a person of interest/subject/suspect. While it is true that military agents are severely limited concerning posse comitatus, they are able to conduct on-sight apprehensions of active duty service members at any time on and off post.

    • @redwolfexr
      @redwolfexr 9 місяців тому

      @@johnhuffman5973 1. Yeah, I will give you that one. Warrants are neither fish nor fowl... it doesn't change the legal limits placed on the service members.
      2. You didn't understand the context I was going for. In-service NCOs may have separate duties from MPs but their detention/arrest authority is the same. They do not have any "special" powers when civilians are involved and that is what the Civilian CID agents being Federal LEOs comes into play. And no, sorry, they are not sworn Federal officers - this would directly violate Posse Comitatus. In practice they will always have a civilian CID agent involved to do civilian arrest part.
      3. When did I ever say the military agents could not arrest army personnel? In fact I said the opposite. That is their main function.
      FWIW my dad was a CID agent in WW2. Or at least a contact for anti-smuggling operations through the Aleutian Islands. Always had an interest in CID.

    • @Buen31
      @Buen31 9 місяців тому +1

      Coming from an Active duty CID Agent this is false, we are sworn federal law enforcement (you can look this up). And yes we can serve civilian arrest warrants when we go through a civilian judge.
      Yes we cannot do on site arrests for civilians OFF POST, but we can serve Civilian Arrest warrants when signed by a judge.

    • @redwolfexr
      @redwolfexr 9 місяців тому

      @@Buen31 I actually DID look it up before I posted. I don't "mind" being wrong, but I think we are misunderstanding more than disagreeing.
      The 10 USC everyone keeps quoting: "The Secretary of the Army may authorize any Department of the Army civilian employee described in subsection (b) to have the same authority to execute and serve warrants and other processes issued under the authority of the United States and to make arrests without a warrant as may be authorized under section 1585a of this title for special agents of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service."
      It says CIVILIAN. Specifies it even. Army MPs can "detain" civilians on military bases, which is the same authority CID has. They can also execute warrants - but not the same broad arrest power than any USCG E5 Boarding Officer has.
      I believe even MPs can execute (Federal only) warrants as long as a judge has issued it and the "recipient" is on base. Legally the Federal Magistrate/Judge is the one ordering the arrest.
      Do you have a different source of authority than Chapter 373, Title 10, United States Code Section 4027?

    • @Buen31
      @Buen31 9 місяців тому +1

      @@redwolfexr I wasn’t denying that our arrest authority is different off post, Military Special Agents are still allowed to detain off post but not arrest. You can look under the Code of Federal Regulations that both Civilian and Military are credentialed Federal Agents. Hence why the Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent Course was accredited by FLETA (it has now recently changed to consolidate training at FLETC). Hence why we are allowed to carry weapons in all 50 states and on planes.
      Arrest Authority is different. But both Civilian and Military Special Agents are credentialed Federal Agents.

  • @Rasdawg915
    @Rasdawg915 10 місяців тому +19

    I seen NCIS bust in and arrest a guy at the barracks once. It was the funniest $#^t ever.

    • @SarafinaSummers
      @SarafinaSummers 9 місяців тому +4

      My hubby and I always yell "Room service!" Whenever a door gets busted, kicked, or shouldered in.

  • @mrmacguff1n
    @mrmacguff1n 10 місяців тому +16

    My dad was a JAG and Judge for the Air Force for most of his career, so i definitely heard about OSI

  • @jeffburnham6611
    @jeffburnham6611 9 місяців тому +16

    I remember an incident many years ago just outside one of the Naval Air Stations in Florida. Not only was the local police involved in the investigation, but so was the NIS and the ATF. How times have changed.

    • @Col_Crunch
      @Col_Crunch 9 місяців тому +2

      It’s rare that an agency would take over an investigation completely. They almost always have or provide assistance to/from other agencies. Especially where multiple jurisdictions exist.

    • @ez12like
      @ez12like 8 місяців тому

      "NIS" Showing your age. LOL

    • @jeffburnham6611
      @jeffburnham6611 7 місяців тому

      @@ez12like Yeah, those were better days, too.

  • @darylcheshire1618
    @darylcheshire1618 9 місяців тому +8

    In Melbourne, Australia during WW2 there was a series of murders called “The Brownout murders”, the guy was a US serviceman call Eddie, he was sentanced to be hanged in Melbourne’s Pentridge Prison. It was approved by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, but it was later found that ultimately was approved by President Roosevelt.
    I read a bunch of US soldiers (MPs?) visited Pentridge and said “stand aside bud, we need to use your gallows”.

  • @Col_Crunch
    @Col_Crunch 9 місяців тому +22

    14:11 the coast guard is actually more unique in that it doesn't just fall under DHS, it is mobile. If congress were to declare war, or if the president issued an executive order, the coast guard would move from DHS to a component of the Department of the Navy, like the Marines.
    As the Coast Guard is a federal law enforcement agency in its own right, CGIS is also unique in that it is the only federal law enforcement agency tasked with policing another federal law enforcement agency.

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 9 місяців тому

      Technically, all the other branches’ investigative services still have authority over those branches’ police entities.

    • @Col_Crunch
      @Col_Crunch 9 місяців тому +3

      @@afcgeo882 true, however MPs have such limited jurisdiction and authority that I don’t really count them.

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 9 місяців тому

      @@Col_Crunch Are you a child?

    • @Col_Crunch
      @Col_Crunch 9 місяців тому +1

      @@afcgeo882 no. You just missed the entire point of the statement I made.

    • @afcgeo882
      @afcgeo882 9 місяців тому

      @@Col_Crunch I haven’t missed a thing yet. It’s all been you, in every one of your comments. These investigative agencies’ jurisdictions are nearly the exact same as the MP’s. It’s just that one is tasked with patrol, response, and force protection and the other with prevention and investigation. Two sides of the same law enforcement coin.

  • @dallasyap3064
    @dallasyap3064 9 місяців тому +15

    2 more agencies weren't mentioned. Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) and Army Counter-Intelligence (ACI).

    • @KRAKOA889
      @KRAKOA889 5 місяців тому

      and Marine Corps Counterintelligence.
      Marine Counterintelligence Agents work to detect and prevent acts of terrorism, espionage, sabotage, subversion, sedition, treason and assassination.

    • @Freehugs1776
      @Freehugs1776 Місяць тому

      There you go finally someone brings this up

  • @boltgamer7
    @boltgamer7 10 місяців тому +22

    You guys should definitely do a video explaining the differences about every military law enforcement/security SWAT teams in every branch such as the Marine Corp (SRT, FAST, RTTs), Navy (SRF, VBSS, Riverine's), Air Force (ESTs, TRF, DAGRE, RAVENs), Army SRTs, and Coast Guard (MSRT, MSSTs, TACLET)

  • @Buen31
    @Buen31 10 місяців тому +18

    Current CID agent, love to see accurate information being put out! Love your work!

    • @SarafinaSummers
      @SarafinaSummers 9 місяців тому +1

      Thank you for your service and sacrifice.

  • @johnreagan904
    @johnreagan904 10 місяців тому +35

    Can you make a video about military judicial system and military courts and judges
    Thanks for all the information ❤

    • @SarafinaSummers
      @SarafinaSummers 9 місяців тому +1

      I second this. I'm a novellist writing a military fiction story and this would be so helpful!

  • @maxvitionunity
    @maxvitionunity 10 місяців тому

    Thank You, For The Help.

  • @josephdvo8273
    @josephdvo8273 9 місяців тому +4

    I saw my old boss running the polygraph exam for OSI, texted him to let him know he’s famous (or maybe infamous depending upon who you ask).

  • @taylorpearce3710
    @taylorpearce3710 9 місяців тому +10

    Air Force osi has alot more specialties in line with ncis, also the fbi ncis and osi are the only three agencies that do both Crim and CI. OSI has a larger deployed mission than the other branches. OSI also does citp and has an 8 week follow on.

    • @NathanD.-yo8zg
      @NathanD.-yo8zg 24 дні тому

      They're not the only 3. DSS has intelligence and counterintelligence. HSI and DEA are also part of the intelligence community.

  • @Popcorps73
    @Popcorps73 9 місяців тому +2

    Best video ever just for starting with NCIS

  • @Jo_Rampengan
    @Jo_Rampengan 10 місяців тому +3

    Good share video's.... military n investigation 👍👍👍💪

  • @clifbradley
    @clifbradley 9 місяців тому +4

    My aunt was OIS in the late 80's. She had the unique distinction to be the only agent to kill someone with the .357 Magnum and to do it the day before they phased the guns out. She shot a civilian in the Philippines. If you want, I'll share the story. Just let me know. It involves beheading, homemade guns, and giant sugar barrels.

    • @NJFireDepartment
      @NJFireDepartment 9 місяців тому

      Yeah this is something I want to hear.

    • @SarafinaSummers
      @SarafinaSummers 9 місяців тому

      Storytime! I'll grab the popcorn.

    • @scotthearts9634
      @scotthearts9634 4 місяці тому

      Plssssssssssss!!!!!! Do tell us! 😊

    • @Big-vr3hz
      @Big-vr3hz 3 місяці тому

      6 months and still no story? :(

  • @logancarey-xo1ik
    @logancarey-xo1ik 9 місяців тому +2

    You guys should do a video on the royal Canadian navy’s naval tactical operations group (NTOG) and Maritime tactical operations group (MTOG)

  • @ivanlowjones
    @ivanlowjones 7 місяців тому

    I recently graduated from the Army Military Police Investigator Course at Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri as a Dept of Navy Civilian Investigator. By far the Army is far ahead of the other branches in terms of funding, training, and equipment.

  • @reddevilparatrooper
    @reddevilparatrooper Місяць тому

    After I left Ft. Carson and stationed in Panama, I ran into one of my guys from my old company. He told me that a guy from 1st Platoon named Mastey tried to sell a night vision sight for a .50 Cal at a pawn shop in Colorado Springs. CSPD apprehended him and called Ft. Carson and CID took him into custody. The guy became a bad soldier because of his Platoon half were Article 15d and a few went AWOL. The company I was told was under investigation to why so many bad influences in the unit. In the end my old company commander was not relieved of command. Many bad soldiers and some NCOs had made some good soldiers turn rotten.

  • @beccaserrano6443
    @beccaserrano6443 9 місяців тому

    Thanks!

  • @nameredacted1176
    @nameredacted1176 9 місяців тому +1

    I highly recommend Richard Doty’s (AFOSI) interview with Steven Greer. You’ll get a better sense of what they do a behind the green door.

  • @gatorcroc7212
    @gatorcroc7212 10 місяців тому +7

    05:33 I do wanna point out and or clarify that not all NCIS agents are civilians. There are many Navy Reserve members that are NCIS agents and drill at your local NRC / NOSC. So yes you can be an NCIS agent and a Navy Sailor.

    • @jalphoto9471
      @jalphoto9471 6 місяців тому

      Hi, if I may ask since you seem knowledgeable, are the rumors true that NCIS agents have little work involving high level crimes, compared to minor crimes, as they are not considered a first response agency .

  • @himehime1629
    @himehime1629 10 місяців тому +6

    Missing DCIS and Army Counterintelligence

    • @brother6819
      @brother6819 10 місяців тому

      Army CI is NOT a law enforcement agency and not authorized to take action against US citizens inside the United States.

  • @thomasfischer6400
    @thomasfischer6400 10 місяців тому +3

    Yeah, making photos in a Danger Zone or even in a Kill Zone is very cool 🙂

  • @1anonymousb
    @1anonymousb 9 місяців тому +2

    A buddy of mine joined OSI. I thought about it for about half a second when recruiters came to my ALS class (NCO school). It could have been interesting, I guess.

  • @Scotty1284
    @Scotty1284 9 місяців тому +3

    if i was ever going to join one, have to say it would probably be CGIS. the scope of what they cover is massive

    • @em68855
      @em68855 7 місяців тому

      also the smallest and most exclusive

  • @dereksmith6097
    @dereksmith6097 5 місяців тому +8

    I proudly served as both an AFOSI agent and a CID agent.

  • @poil8351
    @poil8351 9 місяців тому +3

    it gets very complex overseas as well because jurisdiction can be a convoluted maze depending on the circumstances of the crime and the agreements that are in place with the local government.
    i think they have very limited ability to arrest civilians outside the united states or military bases.

  • @drummingninja1065
    @drummingninja1065 10 місяців тому +18

    Army CI falls under this too. They dont focus on major crimes. Army CID does. But ACI are special agents as well. And have similar jurisdiction to CID.

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +4

      ACI are not 1811 criminal investigators

    • @drummingninja1065
      @drummingninja1065 10 місяців тому +2

      @@UA-camGuy-dm7uy no they're not. At least not yet. But it's in the works.

    • @bs3x
      @bs3x 10 місяців тому

      ​​@@UA-camGuy-dm7uyIt amazes me how many people who don't know what they're talking about get wrapped around the "1811" argument. First, 1811 is not the only law enforcement civilian job class within the federal government, and none of the *military* special agents in the agencies discussed in this video are 1811 either. Nor is any local or state law enforcement for that matter. That said, the fact that ACI *civilian* special agents aren't 1811 is a cold war hold over due to ACI civilians primarily doing ops/clandestine work equivalent to CIA ops as opposed to investigations at the time, which is why they initially coded their civilian agents as 0132. However this has changed and ACI has already requested to change their status due to the fact that ACI civilian agents regularly work criminal investigations, serve as Special Agents in Charge of all ACIC Field Offices, and also sit on task forces (as law enforcement Task Force Officers/TFOs) such as the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces. The only reason it hasn't changed yet is because there is an Army regulation that needs to be changed first that says only Army CID can hire civilian 1811's. However ACI may be creating its own *new* combined law enforcement job class through OPM instead: 1832: National Security Criminal Investigator. Along with all of that ACI is a partner org with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) and is sending its agents to the Criminal Investigator Training Program (CITP) same as OSI, CGIS, NCIS, and now Army CID. Additionally, ACI agents can also receive a DoD Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act (LEOSA) credential as well... So yes ACI agents are qualified criminal investigators and law enforcement, the 1811 class for civilians has nothing to do with it despite it changing soon.

    • @bs3x
      @bs3x 10 місяців тому +6

      Also, National Security Crimes are, in fact, "major crimes." 😉

    • @drummingninja1065
      @drummingninja1065 10 місяців тому +2

      @@bs3x they are. I was referring to the major crimes associated with the agents in the video. But agreed they absolutely are. The damage with national security crimes is usually greater than these ones. But I have a feeling you're already well aware of that.

  • @jed-henrywitkowski6470
    @jed-henrywitkowski6470 8 місяців тому +1

    When my brother was in the Corps, the MPs brought in a Marine to the bring. He had been AWOL since Nam.

  • @Bismillah416
    @Bismillah416 9 місяців тому

    THANK YOU 🤝🏼❤️☀️☀️

  • @Lady_Evelyn
    @Lady_Evelyn 9 місяців тому +3

    NCIS, really good show

  • @psalms27sneadspd46
    @psalms27sneadspd46 10 місяців тому +2

    Great Video. I hope to see one on the Florida Highway Patrol soon. I saw the one you did on the Florida Wildlife Commission.👍

  • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
    @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +18

    There is an error in this video. Military special agents (soldier) may not arrest civilians or charge them with crimes. A military special agent may temporarily detain a civilian but must turn the arrest over to a civilian special agent (1811).

    • @WolffeKid
      @WolffeKid 10 місяців тому +2

      Civilian Special Agent can indeed arrest civilians.

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +10

      @@WolffeKid That is what I said

    • @bs3x
      @bs3x 10 місяців тому +3

      arrest powers have nothing to do with the job class. Posse Comitatus applies to the agency within a military branch in addition to its civilian agents. Just because an agent is a civilian doesn't mean they can automatically arrest civilians.

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +8

      @@bs3x As long as the case has a military interest then MCIOs have statutory authority to investigate and arrest. Posse Comitatus does not apply if there is a military connection to the case.

    • @em34ev3r
      @em34ev3r 10 місяців тому +3

      Thats not true at all. Active duty special agents can indeed arrest civilians. Active duty MP's can detain, but cannot arrest.

  • @exposingproxystalkingorgan4164
    @exposingproxystalkingorgan4164 10 місяців тому +1

    This video information is very interesting. 👮‍♂️

  • @David-nx2vm
    @David-nx2vm 9 місяців тому +4

    Every service component’s Military Police organization will conduct criminal investigations up to a certain threshold, above which their special investigative organizations will assume responsibility. This threshold will vary depending on service guidance, local capabilities and workload, personalities, and so forth. For example, in my first Air Force assignment, our local OSI detachment would not take any drug cases if they involved less than an ounce of marijuana. Because they had this discretion, they would also defer on a variety of criminal cases if there was no suspect, little evidence, or other conditions that may negatively impact the clearance (solve) rate. Take from that what you will. All these special investigation organizations are separate from the local military police and installation chain of command to maintain independence, since they also investigate fraud, official misconduct, procurement irregularities and so forth.

  • @GarikDuvall
    @GarikDuvall 9 місяців тому +8

    While not for a branch, I'm surprised you didn't cover DCIS that's somewhat all-encompassing for DoD and its assets.

    • @GeneralDischarge
      @GeneralDischarge  9 місяців тому +1

      Video would've been too long. For another day!

    • @neuropilot7310
      @neuropilot7310 9 місяців тому +1

      And the one that can hold a General or General officer selectee accountable. DCIS is also involved in investigations involving joint assignments.

  • @eileensalimbene4264
    @eileensalimbene4264 10 місяців тому +2

    Thanks for showing the emblem of CGIS, My husbands outfit!!

  • @jalphoto9471
    @jalphoto9471 6 місяців тому

    hi, great video! I would like to ask a question, since I would like to consider NCIS as a career choice, are the rumors true that NCIS special agents have little work in "criminal" investigations, and not just in minor investigations, due to of the fact that the agency is not considered first response? thank you very much in advance.

  • @1Scimetar
    @1Scimetar 10 місяців тому +12

    An excellent example of one of the agencies covered in this video is the fictional case of Supervisory Special Agent Leroy Jethro Gibbs, from the CBS show NCIS. The show is about a team of fictional NCIS agents that investigate homicide cases involving either the US Marine Corps. or the US Navy based out of the Navy base in Norfolk, Virginia. In the case of Agent Gibbs, his backstory says that he was medically discharged due to psychological issues stemming from the murders of his wife and daughter during Desert Storm, and is now the lead agent on their team. Another fictional and related case from the same show is Agent Samuel Hanna, a retired US Navy SEAL. A third, more removed example, once more from the same series, is Agent Timothy Macgee, the son of a four-star admiral who ended up rebelling against his father's pressure to join the navy, joining NCIS to still serve the navy while doing police work on their behalf.

  • @cybernaut263
    @cybernaut263 9 місяців тому +1

    Love the channel, any chance to cover foreign forces?

  • @SarafinaSummers
    @SarafinaSummers 9 місяців тому

    My high ass laughed waaaay too hard at "club tenitis" Thank you!

  • @adamlane8238
    @adamlane8238 10 місяців тому +8

    I think I have to correct this video. I was Navy Master at Arms for 6 year. I knew agents who were on active duty, from E-5 all the was up to CWO. Some of them are my friends.

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +2

      Marine Corps CID Agents are enlisted but all NCIS agents are civilian.

    • @dsumner1234
      @dsumner1234 10 місяців тому +4

      @@UA-camGuy-dm7uy Yeah, the Navy got rid of military NCIS guys, and from what I understand the Army is thinking about doing the same thing.

    • @adamlane8238
      @adamlane8238 9 місяців тому

      I got out in 2016 so it's possible they aren't doing that any more, but I had friends in my time who were active duty Navy NCIS agents. @@dsumner1234

  • @user-gv7nj1mq4v
    @user-gv7nj1mq4v 9 місяців тому

    Correct me if I'm wrong but at 5:20, the two officers on either side of the agent are Australian Navy.

  • @rufflaneproductions4554
    @rufflaneproductions4554 10 місяців тому

    How do i handle a traffic warrant before going to meps/ can a traffic warrant be wavied

  • @gavinc1539
    @gavinc1539 10 місяців тому

    I alr asked for it but I’ll ask again, can we plz get a vid on marshals fugitive task force?!

  • @78.BANDIT
    @78.BANDIT 9 місяців тому +5

    You forgot about the U.S. ARMY'S MPI... Military Police Investors.

    • @KM-yt2du
      @KM-yt2du 9 місяців тому

      That’s because they’re losers. Wannabe CID.

  • @EricDaMAJ
    @EricDaMAJ 10 місяців тому +61

    One thing I learned in the Army is if you run into a sophisticated crime don't bother calling the MPs. Go straight to CID.
    I found out when I served in Germany. I got approached by a guy outside the Heidelberg shopping center who told me he was from Italy but needed gas to get back. I offered money but he said _"No, I don't want charity. I got nice Italian leather jackets in my trunk. I want to trade them for gas coupons."_ Then he showed them to me. Back then gas coupons allowed American service members to buy local gas at a steep discount. It was absolutely illegal to sell them to the locals. Not only that, but it was also a classic spy trap. An enemy spy gets some GI to sell him coupons illegally, then threatens to tell the Army unless the GI spies for him. I politely declined and beat a hasty retreat. As soon as I was out of eyesight I phoned the MPs and gave the location, a description of the guy, his car, and the car license plate. The MPs did nothing. Probably logged it in their duty log and forgot about it. A year later a CID agent briefed my unit and I mentioned it to him. He thought I just ran into the guy and was ready to roll on down and pick him up.

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 10 місяців тому +7

    but its still dumb how branches hate each other and get into fights amongst each other, why? we are all serving the same country and the same purpose, why cant we just get along and respect each other. duh

    • @georgewashington7982
      @georgewashington7982 10 місяців тому +3

      It’s called friendly banter, quit being sensitive lmao

    • @nesseihtgnay9419
      @nesseihtgnay9419 10 місяців тому +4

      @georgewashington7982 yea, friendly when they tried to kill eqch other idiot 😆

    • @georgewashington7982
      @georgewashington7982 10 місяців тому +1

      @@nesseihtgnay9419 huhhh????????????????

    • @georgewashington7982
      @georgewashington7982 10 місяців тому

      @@nesseihtgnay9419 there’s criminals in every branch idiot, doesn’t generalize the whole military as trying to kill each other

    • @I.want_2piss_on.U
      @I.want_2piss_on.U 9 місяців тому

      Because the navy kicks the army’s ass every time 💪 a soldier is no match for a drunken sailor 😂

  • @charlie2571
    @charlie2571 8 місяців тому

    Can you make a video about Army Counterintelligence please ?

  • @derek6817
    @derek6817 10 місяців тому +1

    Should have had a special mention about Army CI special agents

  • @Anonymousduck161
    @Anonymousduck161 10 місяців тому +6

    CGIS was an absolute joke. I trained them multiple times and they were absolute messes every time. They had no weapon skills and frequently lost weapons and ammunition. I had to draft multiple MLOS reports for them because they constantly could not keep their weapons secure. Worthless.

    • @davidcapalot1816
      @davidcapalot1816 9 місяців тому

      Did they also start problems with service members?

  • @clubclub9058
    @clubclub9058 8 місяців тому

    Hey what about 35l counterintelligence agents in the army u should do video on them cause their really bad ass not only the do counterintelligence they also attach to seal rangers sf and so on some of them also go to isa or attach to tier 1 units

  • @gregiep
    @gregiep 9 місяців тому +1

    The thing you missed is that a huge proportion of the workload of military special agents is the investigation of sex crimes within the military, mostly Article 120.

  • @stefanoskamakian5210
    @stefanoskamakian5210 10 місяців тому +1

    Please make a video on Italian SOF forces

  • @RealMadridAbsolutely
    @RealMadridAbsolutely 10 місяців тому +2

    Totally missed opportunity to name it, ACID

  • @CARL_093
    @CARL_093 8 місяців тому

    i learn many things from this

  • @CKB-vi8nw
    @CKB-vi8nw Місяць тому

    Who do you file a complaint with against the military law enforcement agency for civil rights violations

  • @julianthegodmusic
    @julianthegodmusic 10 місяців тому

    Whoever produces these beats bro. Damn.

  • @GM8101PHX
    @GM8101PHX 8 місяців тому

    I served with the 92d Security Police Squadron, we had direct communication with AFOSI anytime we needed to investigate any crime on our base. However AFOSI would take over when necessary because Security Police still had to secure the base daily! When the president visited our base AFOSI, our squadron and the secret service melded into one big unit to ensure the security of the president. In order to keep things operating smoothly each Security Police officer automatically outranks whomever they are arresting including general officers, however you had better dot your I's and cross your T's or that general might be able to come back at you for a list of charges!! I personally never had to arrest a general, but I did arrest our squadron commander for breaching a no lone zone penetration he made. I was later commended for doing my job though he was our boss!! I went on to serve with my local sheriff's office for 20 years and had a great time doing so. Many of my fellow officers with the sheriff's office never knew of my military service or what job I did. I worked around nuclear weapons 24/7 and we were authorized to shoot first, ask questions later!!

  • @lokalzer0
    @lokalzer0 9 місяців тому

    Naval Discharge should be this channels name. Always makes sure to state the Bellbottom unit is the best

  • @shantanusapru
    @shantanusapru 10 місяців тому +2

    So 'Major' Jack Reacher is a misnomer? A fake? A fraud?😱😱😆😆
    Awesome video, guys!!

    • @muic4880
      @muic4880 9 місяців тому +1

      Reacher's unit was fictional.

    • @shantanusapru
      @shantanusapru 9 місяців тому

      @@muic4880 Whoooooshh!!
      No sh!t, Sherlock!
      Pompous, self-absorbed people with no sense of humour & an inflated sense of self nowadays have no sense of sarcasm & irony...!
      Or, did you forget to notice those emoticons?!?!

  • @Mute_Nostril_Agony
    @Mute_Nostril_Agony 9 місяців тому

    13:37: you can tell from the licence plate that these guys are in Okinawa

  • @poloplatinum74
    @poloplatinum74 10 місяців тому +3

    True... The only time that a military special agent will take a case is if a soldier breaks UCMJ.

    • @em68855
      @em68855 7 місяців тому

      if that were true there would no point of these agencies

    • @poloplatinum74
      @poloplatinum74 7 місяців тому

      @ericm6885 Why is that lol? Do you think that military personnel don't ever break UCMJ?
      Just for the record, UCMJ is VEEY close to most state criminal statutes, except for the military specific stuff like AWOL, and Article 15 type stuff.

    • @em68855
      @em68855 7 місяців тому

      @@poloplatinum74 no but ucmj violations are not the reason these agencies exist. they exist so that they investigate broader scope federal law violations and counter intel in the cases of ncis and afosi.

  • @Deacon_20
    @Deacon_20 10 місяців тому +1

    Great video, though I have to ask; Who else misses the old general discharge voice effect?

    • @GeneralDischarge
      @GeneralDischarge  10 місяців тому

      Is it that noticeable to you?

    • @Deacon_20
      @Deacon_20 9 місяців тому +1

      @@GeneralDischarge yessir, just a good bit

  • @gideoncronje6705
    @gideoncronje6705 10 місяців тому +11

    Can you do a video on the french foreign legion?

    • @Fox-One1937
      @Fox-One1937 10 місяців тому

      Deal with paris 🐀 first

    • @Aleksandre-K
      @Aleksandre-K 10 місяців тому

      ​@@Fox-One1937relevance?

  • @Jhyatt422
    @Jhyatt422 9 місяців тому

    @generaldischarge you should take a look at the Law Enforcement of the Department of the Interior

  • @eastonbradshaw5441
    @eastonbradshaw5441 10 місяців тому +1

    That’s Marine SRT at 13:25 correct?

  • @sberry80
    @sberry80 9 місяців тому

    Ring in the weekend at club tinnitus. Lol

  • @whosalexlmao
    @whosalexlmao 10 місяців тому

    Also intrusive thoughts whats the instrumental that u guys are useing in the background *at 13:13

  • @sever427
    @sever427 10 місяців тому

    But do you Even want to be Here?
    Rasised hand: sir yes sir

  • @LL-cm1wz
    @LL-cm1wz 9 місяців тому +3

    How are you going to leave out the best and widest authority, Defense Criminal Investigative Services (DCIS) ??

    • @KM-yt2du
      @KM-yt2du 9 місяців тому

      Because they gay.

    • @LL-cm1wz
      @LL-cm1wz 9 місяців тому

      @@KM-yt2dunot the Navy lol, DCIS!

    • @KM-yt2du
      @KM-yt2du 9 місяців тому

      @@LL-cm1wz DCIS investigating gay crime while simultaneously being gay themselves.

    • @LL-cm1wz
      @LL-cm1wz 9 місяців тому

      @@KM-yt2dunahhhh, they don’t do just butt touch investigations like the other agencies. They actually get to do crimes against the DoD.

  • @tomahawktom7595
    @tomahawktom7595 10 місяців тому +1

    CGIS does not have commissioned officers..and CGIS also has civilians

  • @Cheese178
    @Cheese178 10 місяців тому +2

    Do South Carolina Law Enforcement Divison please

  • @thorgot911
    @thorgot911 10 місяців тому +3

    Every time you mentioned OSI, i keep thinking of Venture Bros...

    • @PlasmaCoolantLeak
      @PlasmaCoolantLeak 10 місяців тому +1

      Wasn't "OSI" the name of the organization Oscar Goldman belonged to on "The Six Million Dollar Man"?

    • @thorgot911
      @thorgot911 10 місяців тому +1

      I think it was...@@PlasmaCoolantLeak

    • @jamram9924
      @jamram9924 10 місяців тому +2

      @PlasmaCoolantLeak . This question was asked that during our academy class. OSI was molded after the FBI. Shortly after the USAF was created after separating from the Army (1948). The Air Force brought over the FBIs second in command. He was given the rank of Colonel and he became the first OSI director. The new director brought over many of the practices the FBI employed/used.

    • @HarvestTexas
      @HarvestTexas 10 місяців тому

      @@PlasmaCoolantLeak Yep, Office of Scientific Intelligence

  • @ROE675
    @ROE675 10 місяців тому +1

    So I'm guessing it would have been Army CID and NCIS that investigated the bar brawl from the beginning of the video?

    • @biknjak
      @biknjak 10 місяців тому +1

      I don't know how it is now, but when I was an Army MPI (Military Police Investigator) in Berlin in the 80's the German Polizei would pick up and detain brawling soldiers in a German bar, and transport them to the Army post. We would take them from there, interview/interrogate and then turn them over to their First Sergeant/Company Commander, and then refer the case to the Army prosecutor. If there was something to investigate, we would go to the scene and do interviews and/or collect evidence. If it was a really serious crime (murder) CID handled it. So it was kind of a joint venture with the locals, at least with MPI, anyway.

    • @dallasyap3064
      @dallasyap3064 9 місяців тому +2

      CID & NCIS would investigate it bcoz Army and Navy personnel were involved. It would be a joint venture with the local police bcoz it occurred off-base and a civilian was involved too.

  • @ZerostoHeros
    @ZerostoHeros 10 місяців тому +6

    Club tinitus lol

  • @carycoller3140
    @carycoller3140 Місяць тому

    All this needs to be streamlined. Having all these different branches of investigators is a waste of tax dollars. They need something like SOC.

  • @adriancardenas2989
    @adriancardenas2989 7 місяців тому

    It is true that the CGIS is the research service with the fewest resources

  • @twulff7060
    @twulff7060 10 місяців тому +4

    Just imagine how much more efficient, effective, and enhanced it would be, if there was only one Office in the DOD with members of all branches of the military working as one law enforcement agency. E pluribus unum - that should also apply here!

    • @xslickrickx2103
      @xslickrickx2103 10 місяців тому +1

      The DOD has its own agents on top of this

    • @twulff7060
      @twulff7060 10 місяців тому

      @@xslickrickx2103 That is not improving the situation at all!

    • @xslickrickx2103
      @xslickrickx2103 10 місяців тому +1

      @@twulff7060 just saying lol. Seriously though every inspector generals office has its own agents

    • @twulff7060
      @twulff7060 10 місяців тому

      @@xslickrickx2103 Also not improving the situation at all!

    • @dallasyap3064
      @dallasyap3064 9 місяців тому

      The DOD has the DCIS, which answers solely to the DOD IG but it deals with more higher-level national crimes (per my understanding) and not on small personnel crimes etc. But yes I understand what u mean, having all the various services' law enforcement agencies consolidated into 1 single DOD for better efficiency and effectiveness. I'd love for that too.

  • @TheGuamStacker
    @TheGuamStacker 10 місяців тому +1

    What about DCIS?

  • @timelapsecatcher
    @timelapsecatcher 10 місяців тому +4

    Love your content and this topic. You may want to double check on military agents’ jurisdiction. I’m pretty sure military agents cannot arrest civilians, only detain in exigent circumstances.

    • @bs3x
      @bs3x 10 місяців тому

      They don't need exigent circumstances. If they have PC for a arrest, they'll detain and turn over to a civilian agency.

    • @calderonmike
      @calderonmike 10 місяців тому +3

      @@bs3xthe AF OSI has an internal message clarifying that only the Civilian OSI Special Agents are legally authorized to arrest civilians offenders/suspects during their investigations. The military OSI agents do not have any legal authority to arrest civilians as stated in their internal memo.

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому

      @@calderonmike every comment this guy has made is wrong.

    • @dallasyap3064
      @dallasyap3064 9 місяців тому

      That's just dumb. They should fix this loophole. Law enforcement officers are law enforcement officers, don't matter if they're still military or civilian. In fact these law enforcement agencies do not answer to the military services but rather the Department Secretaries which are civilians. So like they should just amend the law that allows military agents to have the authority to arrest civilians too.

  • @markwatters6875
    @markwatters6875 10 місяців тому

    Keep up the great work all. 👍🇦🇺

  • @joshbaucom7811
    @joshbaucom7811 10 місяців тому +1

    I think general discharge is also Mrballen anyone else see similarities

  • @jasonconley4381
    @jasonconley4381 10 місяців тому +5

    Pretty sure OSI had a detachment that deploys with Air Force Special Forces and runs Intel for them and force protection as well

    • @skyj2172
      @skyj2172 5 місяців тому

      What detachment is that? I'd like to know more about that as i'm joining the air force pretty soon and want to eventually go to OSI

  • @vladvld3433
    @vladvld3433 9 місяців тому +2

    Lerroy Jethro Gibbs is the man for the job😀

    • @DrakeSmith-tn6ij
      @DrakeSmith-tn6ij 7 місяців тому +1

      Mark Harmon did an excellent job of portraying LJG.

  • @DavidWhite-vg5hl
    @DavidWhite-vg5hl 10 місяців тому +1

    Please make a video about USMC 02 Field or a video comparing Counterintelligence MOS from different branches

  • @UshaRani-qz1lh
    @UshaRani-qz1lh 7 місяців тому

    One of daring army,wow

  • @sharkinator7819
    @sharkinator7819 9 місяців тому

    Cue NCIS theme

  • @SirDeweyRoyalKnightOfBebahan
    @SirDeweyRoyalKnightOfBebahan 9 місяців тому

    So from this video your telling me that on the show ncis
    Lt colonel Hollis Mann from army cid
    Could not actually be an investigator cause of her rank

  • @blaststormrampage9206
    @blaststormrampage9206 8 місяців тому

    Can they be deployed into combat?

  • @COSMIC_SECRET
    @COSMIC_SECRET 10 місяців тому +1

    Who gets involved if they commit a crime

  • @saniaamirbaaz8850
    @saniaamirbaaz8850 10 місяців тому

    5:21 what camo are they wearing?

    • @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy
      @YouTubeGuy-dm7uy 10 місяців тому +1

      That is a foreign military.

    • @SpecJack15
      @SpecJack15 10 місяців тому +1

      Royal Australian Navy Disruptive Pattern.

  • @RealKorean
    @RealKorean 8 місяців тому

    OSI or as we call them opsec. In the AF, we make jokes like "thats how opsec gets you" or "nice try osi"

  • @BlueMax717
    @BlueMax717 7 місяців тому

    The ultimate blue falcons.

  • @tsebomoloi3410
    @tsebomoloi3410 9 місяців тому

    How is it that America has all these law enforcement agencies but still high crime rates

  • @oltasispasha7286
    @oltasispasha7286 9 місяців тому +1

    NCIS the famous serial based on this.