The Agenda: Minouche Shafik discusses education and inequality

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @sultana7920
    @sultana7920 5 років тому +5

    Shefik couldn't deliver her full opinion due the the inappropriate disruption from the interviewer,, weird this interview done by the economist journal

  • @tijtij
    @tijtij 7 років тому +4

    How much contempt do they have for the middle class if they think they need to use children's book inorder to communicate with the middle class

    • @falsonomine
      @falsonomine 7 років тому +1

      Tijtij As I wrote above, if this is true, same goes for Trump.

    • @Seth4All
      @Seth4All 7 років тому +1

      A large portion of political discourse from the general populace consists of one-sentence solutions to extremely complicated issues with some additional condescending language that the solution is incredibly obvious and that those that disagree are wrong, stupid, racist, etc. We (collectively) are already communicating at the level of children's books.

  • @melcooper2470
    @melcooper2470 7 років тому

    Feel like you're being had? Don't be sad, don't be mad. The experts are in charge, be glad!

  • @trailrider2473
    @trailrider2473 7 років тому +3

    Maybe we should all speak in rhyme
    Then in time
    people won't be so blind

  • @GarrySkipPerkins
    @GarrySkipPerkins 7 років тому +3

    This is horrifying. I do not want simpletons weighing in on economic, scientific or medical policy. They have no business doing so. What we need in the West is for people to either educate themselves to the point where they can constructively engage or defer to experts. The idea that Joe 6-pack should guide trade policy is insane.

    • @Seth4All
      @Seth4All 7 років тому +1

      I agree, but Joe 6-Pack then feels left out. When you get enough Joes with that feeling, bad things like Trump happen.

    • @MooperRanger
      @MooperRanger 7 років тому

      Yes but then they protest for an increase in minimum wage, while their purchasing power stays the exact same and think they've achieved what they've set out to achieve. At the end of the day, its a false victory and because they have no idea what their talking about they believe they've genuinely won.

    • @melcooper2470
      @melcooper2470 7 років тому

      I think we watched different videos.

  • @Hopeyj103
    @Hopeyj103 11 місяців тому

    Maybe communicate for non-violence and humanization instead of advocating for terrorism.

  • @princebey7647
    @princebey7647 4 місяці тому

    Not really impressed with both
    I thought you needed to be brainy to succeed in academic
    I was clearly wrong

  • @marilyntonelli8832
    @marilyntonelli8832 Рік тому

    We don’t talk social mobility here in US. Stay in Egypt. Why are you here

  • @clownpenisfart
    @clownpenisfart 7 років тому +1

    I like good video. Good video is liked by me.

  • @aminaz1778
    @aminaz1778 4 роки тому

    Hubris veiled in modesty

  • @Zayden.
    @Zayden. 7 років тому +7

    Engineers and scientists are experts. Soicial science academic professionals are mostly bourgeois ideologists. Guiding and maintaining the interests of the capitalist class.

  • @123axel123
    @123axel123 6 років тому

    experts gave us roads?????????

  • @shehan117
    @shehan117 7 років тому

    Dr who? Zeus?