Please note that all Bacch products come with an initial setup and walkthrough session with Edgar to calibrate everything for you. You may never need to use or change settings from that initial session, but you also get free support for a year if you would like assistance. Audiophiles that buy Bacch from me will also get access to my private WhatsApp group where Edgar and other Bacch users share tips and help with any questions.
Jason, would ORC be suitable for non dedicated listening rooms (with an RT60 range between 250m and 400) or it would be overkill compared with Dirac for example? (assuming you have a 20k system). Thanks
This is the real deal! BACCH is the best thing you can add to your system. It’s been a game changer for us. We’ve had BACCH for 2 years and if we had to start all over again buying a new system BACCH would be the first thing we would buy!
Bacch is the number one product in hifi. Start with it as the foundation of your setup and things will develop in a much more meaningful way for you as a music lover as you complete your setup. We’ve been with Bacch almost from their start and this is the most innovative and rewarding product available.
I had the same concern, but once you realize the apple versus PC thing isn't applicable here, it's easy. It's a purpose built product where you only use the app shown in the video. Thus, it's the same learning curve even if it were available on PC and their own ecosystem tablet.
@@AudiophileJunkie For me, it's not really an Apple vs. PC, it's why purchase additional hardware that functionally does what the PCs I already have financial commitment in can do with ease-. A graphics interface is just a graphics interface no matter which corporation produces the computational engine behind it. I have no desire to buy another computer that is only a single function. It's not like Android vs, iPhone. But if I already own the top of the line cell phone from one company, why do I need another cell phone just to call one phone number?
You're not following what I'm saying. It's a purpose built product like any other piece in your system. It doesn't matter if you have an Apple or PC computer already, this needs it's own to run exclusively. Thus, it's basically the same as buying any new piece of gear. You will get a manual and learn the interface and that's it. You're getting hung up on the OS behind the app, but that's irrelevant to the end user experience and learning curve. Apple is just more reliable for current programming of this application, so that's what was chosen. It's irrelevant to the user though other than learning how to use a power on/off.. Mouse and keyboard.
@@AudiophileJunkie I have a purpose-built HTPC, though. 16 cores for FIR filters, completely silent. Audio files are on the network and if I want to do general purpose computing, I use Remote Desktop. I'm sure the Mac Mini is fine, but it would be an unfortunate additional expense.
No...you really don't use it other than during the initial setup...Then there is one tab that controls volume and bins which is what used 99% of the time after when you need to change volume. Regardless how it looks to your taste, you got to admit it's far better than a dinky remote that easily gets lost, uses batteries, and zero GUI.
Funny the BACCH system while you can likely use any or many different DACs it comes with the RME babyface. Not the worst DAC, the one I have, but certainly none in the Highend region as I‘d define Highend, plain basic studio chipset.
It's not an RME DAC in the ADIO and DIO. That's just for the lower price point models so people can have a high quality DAC and still get the benefits of the software.
EQ? Sorry, the recording microphones are EQ‘d, already the choice of the instruments and how they‘re damped with rags is EQ, a guitar gets distorted for EQ type reason. What Mastering does is EQing. And to adjust it to your liking everyone has the right to EQ whatever mess he wants with any tool. World is about EQ even on political matters. It‘s rather irrelevant when people bash EQ. No, the question is what is it actually EQ‘ing smartly to, to what level, is it upping or lowering the level of Audio quality, is it making a 30K sound that‘s optimally balanced of a 100K system that‘s standard setup? How is that going to happen with an RME babyface? And an equally moderate type of microfone, and how great is the microfone setup to begin with to allow that box do the right calculations, etc.
The products discussed in this video don't have an RME Babyface. That's for the lower price point B4M but it's actually used in those models mainly for the mic interface. You can use your own DAC with that product as well, but you still need the Babyface for the mics. The Babyface is also pro level gear and allows you to do ADC so people can use analog sources with the Bacch. It also gives you headphone outputs to use the headphone module of the Bacch. The Babyface puts to shame many mega dollar DACs, but the proprietary DAC in the ADIO and DIO is even more optimized with a linear power supply and precision clocking and jitter control. If you EQ to high fidelity metrics, you will more of what the artist intended and almost assuredly won't experience as much aggravating sound that a warped frequency response inevitably delivers.
Please note that all Bacch products come with an initial setup and walkthrough session with Edgar to calibrate everything for you. You may never need to use or change settings from that initial session, but you also get free support for a year if you would like assistance.
Audiophiles that buy Bacch from me will also get access to my private WhatsApp group where Edgar and other Bacch users share tips and help with any questions.
Jason, would ORC be suitable for non dedicated listening rooms (with an RT60 range between 250m and 400) or it would be overkill compared with Dirac for example? (assuming you have a 20k system). Thanks
Awesome! Looking forward part two.
This is the real deal! BACCH is the best thing you can add to your system. It’s been a game changer for us. We’ve had BACCH for 2 years and if we had to start all over again buying a new system BACCH would be the first thing we would buy!
Bacch is the number one product in hifi. Start with it as the foundation of your setup and things will develop in a much more meaningful way for you as a music lover as you complete your setup. We’ve been with Bacch almost from their start and this is the most innovative and rewarding product available.
If the Baacch gets ported to a PC, I'm all in.
I had the same concern, but once you realize the apple versus PC thing isn't applicable here, it's easy.
It's a purpose built product where you only use the app shown in the video. Thus, it's the same learning curve even if it were available on PC and their own ecosystem tablet.
@@AudiophileJunkie For me, it's not really an Apple vs. PC, it's why purchase additional hardware that functionally does what the PCs I already have financial commitment in can do with ease-. A graphics interface is just a graphics interface no matter which corporation produces the computational engine behind it. I have no desire to buy another computer that is only a single function. It's not like Android vs, iPhone. But if I already own the top of the line cell phone from one company, why do I need another cell phone just to call one phone number?
@@AudiophileJunkie The thing is, many of us have PC's . . . makes everything more expensive!
You're not following what I'm saying. It's a purpose built product like any other piece in your system. It doesn't matter if you have an Apple or PC computer already, this needs it's own to run exclusively.
Thus, it's basically the same as buying any new piece of gear. You will get a manual and learn the interface and that's it. You're getting hung up on the OS behind the app, but that's irrelevant to the end user experience and learning curve. Apple is just more reliable for current programming of this application, so that's what was chosen. It's irrelevant to the user though other than learning how to use a power on/off.. Mouse and keyboard.
@@AudiophileJunkie I have a purpose-built HTPC, though. 16 cores for FIR filters, completely silent. Audio files are on the network and if I want to do general purpose computing, I use Remote Desktop. I'm sure the Mac Mini is fine, but it would be an unfortunate additional expense.
Will you be demoing in Tampa?
Yes
I’ll be there. Heard it a couple years ago. Will try again this year.
Scheduling demos?
Yes... Send me an email at audiophilejunkies@gmail.com
We can do a dedicated before or after hours session.
Please upgrade the interface or theme because it looks so 90s. Or open source the interface or theme to design your own.
It's designed with a submarine theme and GUI... Not 90s.
@ can it be changed?
No...you really don't use it other than during the initial setup...Then there is one tab that controls volume and bins which is what used 99% of the time after when you need to change volume. Regardless how it looks to your taste, you got to admit it's far better than a dinky remote that easily gets lost, uses batteries, and zero GUI.
Funny the BACCH system while you can likely use any or many different DACs it comes with the RME babyface. Not the worst DAC, the one I have, but certainly none in the Highend region as I‘d define Highend, plain basic studio chipset.
It's not an RME DAC in the ADIO and DIO. That's just for the lower price point models so people can have a high quality DAC and still get the benefits of the software.
EQ? Sorry, the recording microphones are EQ‘d, already the choice of the instruments and how they‘re damped with rags is EQ, a guitar gets distorted for EQ type reason. What Mastering does is EQing. And to adjust it to your liking everyone has the right to EQ whatever mess he wants with any tool. World is about EQ even on political matters. It‘s rather irrelevant when people bash EQ.
No, the question is what is it actually EQ‘ing smartly to, to what level, is it upping or lowering the level of Audio quality, is it making a 30K sound that‘s optimally balanced of a 100K system that‘s standard setup? How is that going to happen with an RME babyface? And an equally moderate type of microfone, and how great is the microfone setup to begin with to allow that box do the right calculations, etc.
The products discussed in this video don't have an RME Babyface. That's for the lower price point B4M but it's actually used in those models mainly for the mic interface. You can use your own DAC with that product as well, but you still need the Babyface for the mics. The Babyface is also pro level gear and allows you to do ADC so people can use analog sources with the Bacch.
It also gives you headphone outputs to use the headphone module of the Bacch. The Babyface puts to shame many mega dollar DACs, but the proprietary DAC in the ADIO and DIO is even more optimized with a linear power supply and precision clocking and jitter control.
If you EQ to high fidelity metrics, you will more of what the artist intended and almost assuredly won't experience as much aggravating sound that a warped frequency response inevitably delivers.