Adam Ruins Everything - The Conspiracy Behind Your Glasses

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Did you know that a single company controls 80% of all glasses and sunglasses brands?
    Subscribe: bit.ly/truTVSub...
    Watch Full Episodes for FREE: bit.ly/1Rw2yzp
    Check Adam’s Sources: bit.ly/1Q7MHpK
    In Adam Ruins Everything, host Adam Conover employs a combination of comedy, history and science to dispel widespread misconceptions about everything we take for granted. A blend of entertainment and enlightenment, Adam Ruins Everything is like that friend who knows a little bit too much about everything and is going to tell you about it... whether you like it or not.
    truTV Official Site: www.trutv.com/
    Like truTV on Facebook: / trutv
    Follow truTV on Twitter: / trutv
    Follow truTV on Tumblr: / trutv
    Get the truTV app on Google Play: bit.ly/1eYxjPP
    Get the truTV app on iTunes: apple.co/1JiGkjh
    Way more truTV! Watch clips, sneak peeks and exclusives from original shows like Comedy Knockout, Those Who Can't and more - plus fresh video from hit shows like Impractical Jokers and The Carbonaro Effect.
    Adam Ruins Everything - The Conspiracy Behind Your Glasses
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @zacheryjequinto7259
    @zacheryjequinto7259 3 роки тому +717

    "Basic pair of glasses can cost 400$ that's as much as my phone."
    What wonderful times it used to be.

    • @tornad8063
      @tornad8063 3 роки тому +15

      That sound like much for basic glasses. Like that's twice as much qs I paid for titannium framed ones with thknnered lenses with some fancy anryaliasing

    • @melissacooper4282
      @melissacooper4282 3 роки тому +9

      Mine would've cost me $700.00 without insurance!

    • @maestrulgamer9695
      @maestrulgamer9695 3 роки тому +12

      @@tornad8063-Wait,you paid more for thicker lenses?
      I pay more to AVOID thicker lenses!

    • @tornad8063
      @tornad8063 3 роки тому +2

      @@maestrulgamer9695 i meant for not having thicker lenses. My mistake lol.

    • @kalijasin
      @kalijasin 2 роки тому +4

      Even most glasses without a prescription, just clear lenses .. no vision correction, will cost over $100.

  • @lochnessmobster9026
    @lochnessmobster9026 4 роки тому +10

    but is that... legal?
    lobbyists- “I will make it legal”

  • @lizard4250
    @lizard4250 6 років тому +3

    Yup, in Cyprus there are free eye exams. The store I went to was owned by one guy who had a drawer of free frames to choose from if you didn’t want to or couldn’t afford a frame. My current frame cost 119$ but since I was fixed on it he decided to be nice and give me them for free! Goes to show.

  • @godvin9160
    @godvin9160 5 років тому +7

    That's how mafia works
    Legally......

  • @youteubakount4449
    @youteubakount4449 8 років тому +6

    Do one about your "$400 phone", see who's laughing now

  • @nathanbrisebois8756
    @nathanbrisebois8756 4 роки тому +1

    I remember in high school in the early 2000s seeing Ray Bans EVERYWHERE
    On people's faces, marketing everywhere, I was led to believe from one ad that Ray Bans had been around since the 30s and that they were the "Aviator's Choice" wether you were an air force pilot or a civilian pilot.
    It was a great marketing campaign because I believed it, everyone in my high school believed it, and I really wanted a pair. Same think happened with Oakleys, everyone and their grandma was walking around with gascans when they came out.
    Then I found gas station glasses that were identical to gascans or standard non Ray Ban aviators for $15-$20 or less with full UV protection...

  • @garrettv219
    @garrettv219 6 років тому +2

    0:53 1 word: Necessity. Companies sell products for more money because they know that we will buy them no matter the price because we need them to function in our everyday lives.

  • @FTsingos
    @FTsingos Рік тому +3

    It was time for new glasses. I always bought 2 pairs of glasses (1 backup) and got the most expensive ones you could get (sun darkening glasses, lightweight frame and lenses, etc.) I decided to get lasik. I didn't do it for vanity reasons, I actually thought I looked fine with glasses, but I just hated having to always clean glasses, misplace them, etc. And I just realized that I wasn't looking at 4000 for lasik, I was looking at 3000 for it. (I have to get new prescription glasses at least every 5 years anways, so a grand in 10 years). The price is outrageous. I'm not going to lie, the convenience of no glasses was 80% of why I bit the bullet and paid for it, but the fact that glasses are so expensive was a contributing factor.
    Now, if you can pay 4 or 5 grand for lasik (less if you go to Canada), you can save that money over a decade if you're getting new glasses every 2 to 3 years like you're supposed to. I think I used to wait too long in between eye exams.

  • @nsdfnsdf
    @nsdfnsdf 7 років тому +33

    my eye doctor checked my eyes and gave me a prescription. i could A: pay $200 to get glasses from the shop or B: buy on line and only pay $12.

    • @digthewarmth
      @digthewarmth 6 років тому +5

      $12 for both the frames and lenses, or are you just talking about frames?

  • @JW-do2wc
    @JW-do2wc 7 років тому +7

    I never thought Adam would get schooled by a person who he schools all the time.

  • @adamjeremycapps
    @adamjeremycapps 2 роки тому

    I bought these $20 frames from eBay. Taking them in to get lenses I didn't expect much from them. But I have been wearing them for years now without any problem from them at all.

  • @GodAndAmericaLoverBigMacHambur
    @GodAndAmericaLoverBigMacHambur 7 років тому +1

    when its the day after black Friday and you get a black Friday ad anyways

  • @bTuck989
    @bTuck989 2 роки тому +1

    1:58 Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration

  • @VinylToVideo
    @VinylToVideo 5 років тому

    I'm glad I have an old pair of Italian made Guccis frames that have nothing to do with Luxottica, and as they were a store display item I offered and only paid €80. Hope they last forever.

  • @atherman826
    @atherman826 8 років тому +8

    Medi-cal covered mine for free, thanks Obama

  • @MetalSonicReject
    @MetalSonicReject 7 років тому

    As soon as I saw the transition in the episode, I was like, "Oh no...!"

  • @satch422
    @satch422 2 роки тому

    Pleeeaaase bring this show back

  • @tonycouch2966
    @tonycouch2966 2 роки тому

    “She didn’t say Vicious Mockery, but I feel like she’s casting vicious mockery…” -Emily Axford.

  • @gracereads2917
    @gracereads2917 6 років тому

    In England we don't have that problem. The NHS makes sure that glasses are affordable for everyone. Specsavers and Boots sell glasses for at most about £100. That's the average maximum at cheaper places. The NHS also ensure that under 19s don't have to pay for eye tests or glasses unless they choose a designer brand such as Red or Dead and others. The NHS are something America would benefit from. Or something similar.

  • @kaylahhands3201
    @kaylahhands3201 7 років тому

    When she says they are all the same, they still look different so ha

  • @jhonshephard921
    @jhonshephard921 8 років тому

    I just bought my most expensive glasses for about $100 today about $50 for the lens (Crizal) and $50 for the frame(some European brand).
    Before that, I bought Pakistani or Korean or Chinese ones for about $10 - $40 here in Pakistan.
    I will admit that there seemed to be a some difference in comfort and quality.

  • @noriginal2546
    @noriginal2546 3 роки тому +1

    this is why the same glasses are for sale for pennies on the dollar in countries that simply can't afford expensive frames

  • @CaptainQwazCaz
    @CaptainQwazCaz 6 років тому +1

    1:01 *visible confusion*

  • @KarenBear
    @KarenBear 7 років тому

    this video is so true. i shop at Zenni Optical now, i need a new pair, i buy 2 pairs of glasses, the price i pay varies based on what i want. so cheap. before i was told about Zenni, i would spend under or up too $400.00 dollars just for one pair

  • @FormigaFit
    @FormigaFit 6 років тому

    Oh, I wish I knew this when I bought my expensive glasses.

  • @dennisritchie149
    @dennisritchie149 7 років тому

    Illusion of choice - Adam Ruins the Electoral College, lol

  • @CarlosRojasOficial
    @CarlosRojasOficial 3 місяці тому

    Alright, now tell us if the rest of the eyewear factories are capable of implementing the same quality control as Luxottica: resins and acetates made from organic and long-lasting materials, hand made assembly processes, etc.

  • @NAKATAHKGHK
    @NAKATAHKGHK 5 років тому

    When I heard that LUXOTTICA is monopolising eyesglass manufacturing,I feel this is very shameless
    They can freely set prices, they can set it very expensive in a non-competitive environment. This is very crazy!

  • @navioner
    @navioner 8 років тому

    I have to wear bifocal and they are pretty thick, I used to think that they were expensive because of the lenses and not the frame.

  • @Emrys91
    @Emrys91 6 років тому

    Im the Adam now LOL

  • @thomaszinser8714
    @thomaszinser8714 5 років тому

    My current pair of glasses is from that 20% of the market that isn't Luxottica, somehow.

  • @furuzon12
    @furuzon12 7 років тому

    I just dropped $400 on pair of Marc Jacobs prescription glasses...thank god my medical insurance paid for it, but definitely not buying fancy frames anymore.

  • @gracedixon125
    @gracedixon125 7 років тому

    That's why I use eyebuy direct. :\ I got 2 pairs of prescription glasses for about $80

  • @mr.k7475
    @mr.k7475 7 років тому +8

    if people stop buying glasses at 400$, they would stop asking 400$ for a pair of glasses.. :/

    • @nathanielstein8904
      @nathanielstein8904 6 років тому

      I need to see, but I guess I have to go blind or it's my fault this corrupt business goes on.

    • @danielm4874
      @danielm4874 6 років тому

      then we all blind *HELP US*

    • @okbuddy2924
      @okbuddy2924 6 років тому

      Yes but i need to see lmao

  • @justinblythe3914
    @justinblythe3914 8 років тому

    I like it when Adam does it better

  • @plazmamattery8153
    @plazmamattery8153 Рік тому

    As a luxottica employee- this made me laugh😂

  • @jerome96114
    @jerome96114 8 років тому

    That is why you buy your glasses in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, or via Aliexpress for only a tiny cost of what they cost in the west.

    • @patiofurnituregt
      @patiofurnituregt 6 років тому

      Yes, but fakes that undergo no testing or real quality control or certification. And even better take money away from the companies that develop the product in the first place.

  • @liamgeffenmanor7088
    @liamgeffenmanor7088 3 роки тому

    oh how the tables have turned

  • @quacktac
    @quacktac 7 років тому

    $400 for a pair of glasses? I bought my Ray Bans for £90, including lenses...

  • @richardh2790
    @richardh2790 8 років тому

    $400? Then where did I get my $100 glasses?

    • @The_Daily_Tomato
      @The_Daily_Tomato 8 років тому

      Luxottica owns the cheap ones too. The difference is your cheap 100 dollar glasses should only have cost about 40 dollars.
      I payed over a thousand for both my glasses and the stuff that holds it to my face when it's real value would be around 300 dollars.
      Did i have a choice? Nope.

  • @silverperzon
    @silverperzon 7 років тому

    Have to get new glasses today welp.... there goes my $400 for a $14 plastic frame

  • @theninjararar
    @theninjararar 8 років тому

    ironically her phone probably only costs about 2$ to make, not counting software and development the price markup is a lot higher.

  • @jamessumner4744
    @jamessumner4744 6 років тому

    Cheapest pair of glasses I worn was free Expensive is about 100 to 200 dollars they both work finely

  • @barrys4922
    @barrys4922 2 роки тому

    The founder of Luxottica died recently. He was worth $25 billion.
    That's what monopolizing the eyeglass industry gets you.

  • @shadowinthedark2851
    @shadowinthedark2851 7 років тому

    Take that Adam

  • @josephmiller8974
    @josephmiller8974 Рік тому +1

    You know those fancy industrial machines you see in the background at Lens Crafters in the mall? Most of those aren't actually working machines. There's a guy whose job is to go to factories going out of business and buy machines that look like they'd belong in their store. Meaning, when you go pick up your Lens Crafters glasses, they have things like Sees Candy machinery to fool fools into thinking it's a legit business. Americans are amazingly gullible...

  • @TheGreatSeraphim
    @TheGreatSeraphim 6 років тому

    I want to know why lenses, made of plastic... especially stronger prescriptions made from the exact same plastic slug as a lower one, costs more. I know the answer is obvious price gouging someone who needs them more. And I know why it can't be fixed. But I'm still not happy about it.

    • @patiofurnituregt
      @patiofurnituregt 6 років тому

      Well, there is a difference in optical clarity between cheap plastic lenses and high quality polycarbonate or high index lenses. Achieving high quality optics out of injection molded plastic is not easy,not including the post process to machine the perscription. These differences may be instantly noticeable or may take a longer period of time to strain your eyes. Also, high quality polycarbonate lenses are much safer than glass lenses. Just watch some test videos!

  • @oakleylowe3939
    @oakleylowe3939 7 років тому

    Should have gone to specsavers!

  • @Argorok87
    @Argorok87 8 років тому

    Does Luxotica have control outside the US as well?

    • @queenie16
      @queenie16 7 років тому

      Yes. They're an Italian company, they own OPSM (an Australian chain that has the same logo as LensCrafters), and they have an office in Buenos Aires, which is in a country where most eyewear is imported in the first place.

  • @0Clewi0
    @0Clewi0 6 років тому

    How to know which companies does Luxotica owns in other countries?

  • @leeannvan1422
    @leeannvan1422 7 років тому

    $400 bucks for a pair of glasses? My glasses only cost me $75 for the frames and lenses being uv and scratch resistant. This was a family owned store though. I also replaced my other pair of glasses lenses today at walmart for like $50

  • @play4thrill42
    @play4thrill42 8 років тому

    and that's why I only get glasses when I'm in Egypt, the glasses that cost $400 here are only like $50 there lmao #takingadvantageofpooreconomiesftw

  • @jackandrews7821
    @jackandrews7821 6 років тому

    If you think the mark up on eye glasses are bad, go look up printer ink.

  • @Captain_Mike82
    @Captain_Mike82 8 років тому +1353

    My sister in-law brags about getting designer frames. This made me feel good about buying the cheapest frames I could find.

    • @dfl7649
      @dfl7649 5 років тому +44

      Still getting ripped off for the lenses made of cheap plastic though. Plus even if government insurance is covering our glasses, the money still goes to Luxottica who either owns or has shares. That's tax dollars from you and me keeping them fat even if we buy cheap frames.

    • @Sam42069
      @Sam42069 5 років тому +4

      Send her this video

    • @noby_huangkonghsiong
      @noby_huangkonghsiong 4 роки тому +11

      Ripped off... I've bought a pai of glasses in China and it only costs me 47 usd. I used the glasses for years already and it still held up very well and it is made with real metal in the inside. The quality is very consistent and the only thing that got onto it was some rust, but not too serious. At least Luxottica doesn't own Chinese glasses companies.

    • @thinhvo3893
      @thinhvo3893 4 роки тому +7

      @@noby_huangkonghsiong I bought in vietnam for less than 10.

    • @stevekudlo1464
      @stevekudlo1464 4 роки тому +3

      I bought two pairs plus an exam for about a hundred dollars stateside, but one of them broke after a month. Very low quality.

  • @Vertson
    @Vertson 7 років тому

    1:58 Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration

  • @christiannguyen7509
    @christiannguyen7509 6 років тому +742

    “Glasses are like 40% of my personality!” I bet the other 60% is Adams hair

  • @Final_Boss
    @Final_Boss 8 років тому +389

    Damn, George Carlin hit the nail on the head during his stand-up where he said "You have no choice, you have owners, they own you. You only have the illusion of choice."

    • @blazetino5713
      @blazetino5713 3 роки тому +15

      This is all one-big club. And YOU AINT IN IT. You and I are not. in. the. club.

    • @josephmak4999
      @josephmak4999 Рік тому +1

      George Carlin's stuff should be required viewing for everyone

    • @zacharynguyen7286
      @zacharynguyen7286 8 місяців тому

      Hope everyone doing good. Sending support and hearts! ❤️❤️❤️ Stay safe. Always remember that people care. Sending support and even more hearts!❤️❤️❤️ Stay safe❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤❤❤

  • @Jakegothicsnake
    @Jakegothicsnake 8 років тому +1682

    "I'm the Adam, now......."

    • @lucifercon4868
      @lucifercon4868 8 років тому +53

      it is her second time

    • @hrishiv27
      @hrishiv27 7 років тому +71

      Lucifer Con I feel like the comment wasn't because of the TV powers, but it was because of the fact that she was ruining something he loved. Last time she was tackling a common misconception.

    • @wolfwoodphreak
      @wolfwoodphreak 7 років тому +7

      I'm the captain now lol

    • @WZWarden
      @WZWarden 6 років тому +5

      Look at me look at me

    • @mackenzieb1572
      @mackenzieb1572 6 років тому +1

      *ahhh*

  • @wafflezpuncakes1600
    @wafflezpuncakes1600 8 років тому +260

    All these people like "I got my glasses for seven bucks online" and I'm here like. ".....I'm registered as low-income I thought my sixty dollar glasses were a blessing.."

    • @thegeneralpopulace8513
      @thegeneralpopulace8513 7 років тому +2

      Wafflez Puncakes Right?!

    • @JustAnotherPerson4U
      @JustAnotherPerson4U 6 років тому +3

      in England I'm lucky if I can get a pair of glasses for at least 100 quid. I'm not a child anymore nor a pensioner so i dont get a big discount, I also have a very high prescription which means they have to make complex lens and may have to thin my lens in order for them to fit and not distort the frame.
      Oh and the plastic frames that will fit my glasses i have to buy in the £25-35 range cos any lower and they won't fit.
      And I do get a voucher... But its a pittance conplex lens voucher because a technicality of not having bad enough astigmatism along with my bad vision prevents me from getting the higher voucher I should get cos i am really short sighted. The voucher is only £14 on the whole thing which is easily at least over one hundred for one pair... Yeah that voucher doesnt even cover the frames!

    • @ottovonbismarck6310
      @ottovonbismarck6310 5 років тому +2

      Even bargain sites don't do much better than $60 --they a la carte you over $100 easily.

    • @SakuraaaHarmony
      @SakuraaaHarmony 5 років тому

      Adilade Jones what happens if you aren’t able to see out of the glasses properly? You can’t really go into a physical store to fix the issue

    • @adiladejones1722
      @adiladejones1722 5 років тому +2

      Barbietoofaded I have 7 pairs from them, I have never had that issue. If you have a proper prescription from an optometrist then you shouldn’t have an issue.

  • @QasperDubstep
    @QasperDubstep 7 років тому +88

    That guy is actually a good representation of people who wear Oakleys

    • @1218Draco
      @1218Draco 9 місяців тому

      Randy Marsh: “Wow! My very own Oakleys!
      😎 Oh yah, bro; these are sweet!”

  • @SkeleSukei
    @SkeleSukei 7 років тому +91

    Reminds me of the EpiPen conspiracy, which I also can't really live without...

    • @carultch
      @carultch 4 роки тому +4

      Someone made a video game about that, called EpiPen Tycoon.
      everydayarcade.com/games/epipen-tycoon

  • @caliqm2199
    @caliqm2199 4 роки тому +92

    "My turtles?They're fine"
    I don't know whether to feel sad or assume he's Master Splinter

  • @SpaceFlye
    @SpaceFlye 8 років тому +123

    I actually knew this because of that 60 minutes episode on Luxotica. Wasn't aware they owned eye care places too. I only ever only get my prescription now and just buy glasses online (zenni optical) for like $35.

    • @NomadAngie
      @NomadAngie 3 роки тому +1

      Last year I went to VisionWorks, and I spent too much money on glasses with antiglare, blue light filter and scratch resistant and God knows what else. Regularly I get my glasses at the VA optical shop without too much fuzz but I paid for the convenience I guess. I barely wear those glasses now.

    • @kalijasin
      @kalijasin 2 роки тому +4

      The $35 is only for the frames. They tack onto that the cost for lenses, shipping, coatings, etc.

    • @Pedro_del_Rod
      @Pedro_del_Rod 2 роки тому +3

      My glasses were about $70. But that included Photochromic (similar to Transition lenses) AND Blue-light blocking. The frames were about $20 to $25.

    • @DrewMeyerhoe
      @DrewMeyerhoe 2 роки тому +2

      @@kalijasin Depends on your vision needs. 1.5 index lens? Included free. Many even have 1.56 index for free. UV protection? Included free. Anti-scratch coating? Included free. If you have basic prescription needs, you can get glasses for $6.95 + $4.95 shipping in the USA. So saying they cost around $35 is a pretty reasonable average. Mine cost about that because I got AR coating and frames that were in the $20's. When your vision is -1 (mine) or -2, you don't really need much more unless you want certain add on's like polarization, transitions, water/oil smudge coatings, blue light blocking, etc.

  • @leiffitzsimmonsfrey1272
    @leiffitzsimmonsfrey1272 7 років тому +35

    AAARG.
    My dad runs a glasses company (Independent, I know 'cause he's the CEO)
    Price was $100, except partnerships.
    The cellulose acetate (frame material) costs something like $10-20
    But we need to pay a salary (singular)
    And the heater
    And the rent
    And all the machines
    And worst of all, the competition made more
    So we had to raise the cost to $250
    Vicious cycle.

    • @kmcq692
      @kmcq692 3 роки тому +6

      I’d pay that, to support a legit small business.

    • @keerabrar4314
      @keerabrar4314 2 роки тому +2

      Yea people need to understand that regular business have expenses like rent, heat, employee salaries. Whereas online stores is basically all profit for them how are you supposed to compete with that and huge monopolies

    • @kalijasin
      @kalijasin 2 роки тому +3

      The equipment/tools needed to manufacture eyeglass frames by hand cost less than $500.

  • @Thecupboardsareempty
    @Thecupboardsareempty 8 років тому +629

    $400 is norm?? sheeshh

    • @shoesmcge2630
      @shoesmcge2630 8 років тому +28

      i once spent $200 on a pair of sunnies...its probably the most moneys iv ever spent on clothing and i immediately regretted it.....they look cool but

    • @akinmytua4680
      @akinmytua4680 8 років тому +26

      yeah. I just spent $512 on my prescription glasses. My insurance was denied so I payed out of pocket. The store did try to give me some coupons to bring it down to about $430... And my eye condition means I need new glasses every year

    • @Thecupboardsareempty
      @Thecupboardsareempty 8 років тому +6

      Autymn Maas
      jeezz that sucks. Rather stay visually handicapped. Most I've ever paid is 180

    • @akinmytua4680
      @akinmytua4680 8 років тому +16

      I am nearsighted in one eye and farsighted in the other with astigmatism in both eyes... So not an option for me unfortunately. I'm also an artist and librarian by trade. I need to see details.

    • @skecthiness7075
      @skecthiness7075 8 років тому +2

      I dont need glasses because my vision is 20x20 but wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy contacts?

  • @lovejones0686
    @lovejones0686 3 роки тому +43

    Please bring this show back. I love it so much. I enjoy showing people the knowledge of this show.

    • @TheHutchIsOn
      @TheHutchIsOn 11 місяців тому +1

      Adam has his own channel

  • @SomeDudeOnline
    @SomeDudeOnline 8 років тому +242

    I've always figured glasses had to be a rip off but have never needed them so haven't let it upset me too much. I think episodes like this should describe what can be done about it. In a situation like this, I would think "Boycott" but .... if you need glasses, you really can't. So what can you do? There are laws in place to prevent monopolies but I guess they technically aren't a monopoly since they technically *only* own 80% of the market.
    So what can you do?

    • @Kadulikan
      @Kadulikan 8 років тому +31

      Welcome to the show. The first ever bit was on engagement rings, and ended on how "there is nothing you can do about it."

    • @SomeDudeOnline
      @SomeDudeOnline 8 років тому +4

      Kadulikan Well that sucks

    • @tigerguy529
      @tigerguy529 8 років тому +55

      they actually do give you a solution in the end of this episode: buy online. Any manufacturer can make a website so they don't have to sell through Luxotica owned businesses, you just have to know who owns the company you're buying from

    • @swingdancechick
      @swingdancechick 7 років тому +21

      except they include glasses.com which IS owned by Luxottica, which you can see here - www.luxottica.com/en/retail-brands/glassescom

    • @trevorlambert4226
      @trevorlambert4226 7 років тому +25

      Engagement rings are entirely unnecessary. As soon as you figure that out, it's pretty simple. Just don't buy one, or buy one without diamonds for $30. So there's that you can do about it.

  • @rosie7640
    @rosie7640 3 роки тому +25

    "What luxottica is truly selling you is the illusion of choice." DAMN. That is dark asf.

    • @JMMJK
      @JMMJK 2 роки тому +1

      Dark but true

  • @eriviscale2
    @eriviscale2 8 років тому +707

    How is this legal?

    • @andrewseeram9411
      @andrewseeram9411 8 років тому +94

      lol seriously wondering the same thing

    • @eriviscale2
      @eriviscale2 8 років тому +32

      Jimin Stole My Jams I know right. Its the 21st century for Gods sake.

    • @asj511
      @asj511 8 років тому +155

      Politicians can be bought, you know?

    • @szt5477
      @szt5477 8 років тому +118

      Owning a monopoly on something isn't illegal. It's actually a scarily common practice in medical fields.
      www.wsj.com/articles/pharmaceutical-companies-buy-rivals-drugs-then-jack-up-the-prices-1430096431

    • @shooglechic
      @shooglechic 8 років тому +80

      the way the government regulates the economy with their legislature allow corporatism like this to exist. they take over smaller, competitive companies whilst keeping the different names to give the ILLUSION of a competitive market.

  • @LeviJohansen
    @LeviJohansen 7 років тому +200

    1:36 Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration

  • @danieljames1868
    @danieljames1868 7 років тому +110

    _i'm the adam now_

  • @SerahValentine
    @SerahValentine 8 років тому +112

    This is a funny coincidence since the day this came out I was doing a retail course where glasses came up.The trainer was having good fun talking about their markups and where they came from. He found a budget store and got a pair for $60, much better than what a lot of people he'd meet get I'm sure. After explaining that he mentioned where the frames would be bought, as well as the lenses and the changes needed to be made for a specific prescription, the total was only $17. So many people are being made to think they're so expensive, and until yesterday I sincerely thought that was true. The only thing of value is making it your prescription. If that's a complicated prescription that adds more of course, but they're still very cheap to make. Mine was from a budget store and were still $140 dollars. Markups, they're just ridiculous.

    • @Joesgro15
      @Joesgro15 8 років тому +3

      You should get this book published

    • @SerahValentine
      @SerahValentine 8 років тому +4

      Joey Sgro I've written much longer comments before. People were recognising me from them.

    • @Joesgro15
      @Joesgro15 8 років тому

      Looks like you got more than 1 book to publish than

    • @SerahValentine
      @SerahValentine 8 років тому +2

      Joey Sgro Pretty much.

    • @donmiller2908
      @donmiller2908 8 років тому +3

      Forget those people. I found your post interesting and informative.

  • @CyberKirby
    @CyberKirby 7 років тому +60

    I now have a vendetta against Luxotica. Thanks guys!

  • @kn3186
    @kn3186 8 років тому +725

    Sad part is this is legitimately 100 percent true. Trust me I would know.

    • @skullcandy14785
      @skullcandy14785 8 років тому +12

      How,You work for them?

    • @kn3186
      @kn3186 8 років тому +86

      I used to work logistics for Luxottica. All these SUPER HIGH END BRANDS like Prada, Channel, Gucci etc. They are all worth the same its funny because they are treated the same as the lens crafter discount models. As for Oakley after these horrible people bought them there was a storm of just Oakley boxes going through. Keep in mind this was JUST for Luxottica international.

    • @EvanBagwell
      @EvanBagwell 8 років тому +31

      My mom confirmed it too. She's been working in the eyewear industry for almost 20 years haha

    • @skullcandy14785
      @skullcandy14785 8 років тому +33

      My god, the glasses industry truly a monopoly

    • @theredryuda2721
      @theredryuda2721 7 років тому +5

      It's true they're pretty much all of the work my lab does.

  • @jinensetpal
    @jinensetpal 4 роки тому +53

    0:45 "The most basic pair of glasses cost $400, which is the same as my phone"
    Didn't age well.
    Now we pay $1200 for our phones!

    • @kalijasin
      @kalijasin 4 роки тому +2

      I can get a 50” 4k Roku Tv with HDR and 120hz for less than that. Lol

    • @BlackHawk2029
      @BlackHawk2029 2 роки тому +5

      I paid $250 for mine 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @toob_noob4381
      @toob_noob4381 2 роки тому +5

      You only pay $1200 if you're a stupid schmuk

    • @gluttonousgoddess
      @gluttonousgoddess 2 роки тому +1

      Guessing you're an idiot and bought an iphone

    • @noone-hd1ck
      @noone-hd1ck 2 роки тому +1

      No we dont. I didnt even pay 1/4th of that for my phone. Only the idiots who buy iphones pay that much money

  • @LiamMarcon
    @LiamMarcon 8 років тому +61

    Glasses are pretty reasonably priced in Australia, with plenty of design options. Also if you're registered as low income you get them heavily discounted or free.

    • @calvinscheuerman
      @calvinscheuerman 8 років тому +27

      yeah, but, giant monster spiders. so that kinda evens things out.

    • @Keronin
      @Keronin 8 років тому +5

      Calvin Lee, best response ever.

    • @Lord_Swoledemort
      @Lord_Swoledemort 8 років тому +6

      This video doesn't really apply to Australia anymore. It's more like Specsavers vs Luxottica with Specsavers holding the majority share of the market now.

    • @wcam7822
      @wcam7822 7 років тому +3

      heavily discounted or free means a taxpayer subsidy. nothings free. somewhere along the line, you are paying for it

    • @LiamMarcon
      @LiamMarcon 7 років тому +7

      Canna Sayit yep... what's your point? you just explained how taxes and public services work? was that supposed to be an opposing point?

  • @TheSugarRay
    @TheSugarRay 8 років тому +125

    Next time she takes over, they should give her Viper's hair from Street fighter.

  • @BobSaint
    @BobSaint 5 років тому +26

    The representation of the Oakley guy was 100% on point.

  • @ArtisticlyAlexis
    @ArtisticlyAlexis 6 років тому +10

    Because of this sad truth, I have for years refused to buy anything Luxottica makes, only buying from independently owned stores. Before I even begin to look for frames there, I ask to be shown only non Luxottica brands, which is sadly not that many in a lot of stores. Crazy thing is, you can find amazing, and very unique styles if you're willing to venture out of the malls. They're sometimes less than what you'd get for a cookie cutter look from one of the chain stores, while not giving into this hidden monopoly; you just need to go to boutique shops to find them. For those of us with complex eye issues that make it impossible to buy online, it's the only option to get away from the behemoth that is Luxottica!

  • @triky5384
    @triky5384 8 років тому +294

    Why does it say that this was just posted an hour ago? I watched this a couple of days ago

    • @AM-bj7yo
      @AM-bj7yo 8 років тому +38

      That was on CollegeHumor, I wondered the same thing at first

    • @zurfer11
      @zurfer11 8 років тому +48

      Because Luxotica also owns You Tube. They are messing with you head.

    • @Fixided
      @Fixided 8 років тому +66

      They're giving you the illusion of choice.
      CollegeHumor or truTV?
      Doesn't matter because Luxotica owns them all.

    • @cheoyeo546
      @cheoyeo546 8 років тому +1

      HAHAHA

    • @Collision_TN
      @Collision_TN 7 років тому +2

      They've probably changed video privacy from Public to Private/Unlisted and back again.

  • @illusion9423
    @illusion9423 5 років тому +13

    "How are your loved ones?"
    -My turtles? They're quite well

  • @Lattrodon
    @Lattrodon 8 років тому +275

    I'm glad I have perfect vision

    • @godbearxd
      @godbearxd 8 років тому +18

      I know right! 75% of Americans NEED glasses or contacts to see how lucky are we?! 😀

    • @coolnobodycares
      @coolnobodycares 8 років тому +1

      😭

    • @queenie16
      @queenie16 7 років тому +14

      I used to have perfect vision. Then my right eye had to go and decide nothing beyond 5 feet needed to be *that* clear.
      I still have perfect vision in my left eye. It's kind of a shame that I had to buy a whole pair of glasses just so I don't crash when I drive at night when all I needed was a monocle.

    • @michellemarie1197
      @michellemarie1197 7 років тому +4

      what if it fails when you get old? then it won't be perfect anymore

    • @Lattrodon
      @Lattrodon 7 років тому +1

      michelle kearsey I'll be dead before I'm old

  • @mrdasgehtsienichtsan2020
    @mrdasgehtsienichtsan2020 8 років тому +230

    the sentence "everything is worth what people are ready to pay" is one of the most basic concepts of buisness...

    • @thomrivera
      @thomrivera 8 років тому +23

      Yes, but when there is no competition to control pricing?

    • @mrdasgehtsienichtsan2020
      @mrdasgehtsienichtsan2020 8 років тому +4

      thom rivera then its too bad
      its not a companys job to keep the market fair.. thats the job of the law
      but the law isnt fair this time... thats all

    • @brunsworks
      @brunsworks 8 років тому +15

      Seems like a clear violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which specifically prohibits multiple different types of curtailment of competition, but in this case, especially vertical integration used to crush competitors. In 1948, U.S. v. Paramount (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc.) saw the Supreme Court rule that the five major motion picture studios could could not own theatres and could not control what films they showed. There have been subsequent inroads made in that particular industry that did wind up giving the big studios some control as a cartel, most notably the MPAA, which notoriously delays and gives arbitrary ratings to independent films. But the point is similar: vertical integration at the level Luxottica has reached is unfair to consumers, and would also be struck down in the U.S., if only someone had the wherewithal to take legal action. While the company is headquartered in Italy, their operations in other countries are subject to those countries' laws.
      The fact that there is token competition in the eyeglasses and sunglasses market is immaterial.
      Of course, that said, Snopes remains unconvinced that Luxottica actually owns 80 percent. (www.snopes.com/does-luxottica-own-80-of-the-eyeglass-industry/) It might be better to say "as much as 80 percent.

    • @VeriVeronika
      @VeriVeronika 8 років тому +20

      Yeah, the statement is true, but in the context of a company that basically holds a monopoly in an industry (specifically one involving something people NEED) , it is a disgusting and deplorable thing to beleive and consequently abuse.

    • @levprotter1231
      @levprotter1231 7 років тому

      Its true.
      In my country, glasses are always 90% off for this exact reason.

  • @walteracevedo5105
    @walteracevedo5105 7 років тому +18

    Was planning on new glasses. Went to a place, asked how much was the procedure without coverage.
    $140 BEFORE choosing your frame. UK, Canada, can you help a brother out?

    • @jayjem8295
      @jayjem8295 7 років тому +2

      go to Russia, they'll help you out

    • @gloryyalovee6182
      @gloryyalovee6182 6 років тому

      Fruit Roll Up God in Canada? Lol no its about the same price

    • @Ariffy04
      @Ariffy04 6 років тому

      Buy 1 get 2 free

    • @Crackin-Egg
      @Crackin-Egg 6 років тому

      In the UK healthcare is free and the NHS give you a voucher for the glasses worth roughly £40 and in major stores like boots I can get a student discount. Also I just got glasses recently for the first time (damn screens) and I got 2 nice ones for £14 with buy one get one free, and the designer ones I loved were £230, but I couldn't get those

  • @tparadox88
    @tparadox88 Рік тому +5

    I have bought my own glasses three times so far. The first time was just before I fell off my parents' insurance and the family eye doctor charged 200-and-something. Then I didn't have money for glasses for several years, and when I went out to use my insurance in 2019, I didn't bother shopping at the optometrist and went straight to Zenni. Bought a pair for $70 and as an out of network provider Eyemed gave me almost $50 back. A pandemic and a job change later I thought I'd let my new eye clinic quote me on a pair. It came out to $450 after insurance. My new pair from Zenni arrives next week for $80 and I expect to get more than half of it back. I'm not going to waste my time on clinic fittings again.

  • @trooper3030
    @trooper3030 8 років тому +11

    Thought everyone knew this. Been exposed for about 3 years now

  • @joo-hwanjun1684
    @joo-hwanjun1684 8 років тому +12

    Emily: I'm the Adam now!
    Adam: [whimpers in dread]
    Me = dying!!!

    • @richardsavings6690
      @richardsavings6690 3 роки тому

      "We don't have to teleport everywhere, we could just walk."
      "Why?"
      True.

  • @shiaras4675
    @shiaras4675 Рік тому +7

    I've been using the same frame for years even though the lens have changed over time. I always make sure to ask the optometrist if it's possible for me to use the same frame when I'm getting fitted for new glasses.
    Not all the places I've been to agreed to me reusing my frame so I stick to the ones that allow it.
    Saves me a ton

  • @eldadmaster
    @eldadmaster 8 років тому +48

    75% of Americans need glasses? That doesn't seem right

    • @SomnambulistCraze
      @SomnambulistCraze 8 років тому +55

      75% need them. doesn't mean they wear them. 3 of the 4 people in my house need them, but mostly my sisters just uses hers.

    • @zakwycoff9244
      @zakwycoff9244 8 років тому +59

      if you think about it, it adds up. The people who wear glasses regularly, the people with contact lenses so it doesn't seem like they are wearing/in need of glasses, the people who should but refuse to wear their glasses, and the people that like only need them for reading and stuff. Plus when you think about it, like 90% of elderly people have glasses, and that's a pretty big part of the population

    • @Snakeofwrath
      @Snakeofwrath 8 років тому +7

      Well some wear contacts, some get laser eye surgery, and some only need reading glasses.

    • @SerahValentine
      @SerahValentine 8 років тому +14

      You could wear glasses for even minor eye problems. I'm like that, even if I can't see what's wrong I'm actually constantly straining my eyes without notice and will usually get a headache if I've been reading or writing. I got some so I could avoid the headache. It's been good.
      Also your sight can start to fade at 30. It's gradual across your life. So plenty of thirty year olds could need them as much as me but not notice.

    • @youteubakount4449
      @youteubakount4449 8 років тому +4

      Should have said "brain" instead of glasses

  • @Veronica-or5ii
    @Veronica-or5ii 3 роки тому +3

    I used to work at target optical and our manager would make us throw away the made in China paper that came in with prescription raybans

  • @killerz1032
    @killerz1032 8 років тому +13

    Look at me....
    LOOK AT ME!!!!!!
    I'm the Adam now

  • @GanonGhidorah
    @GanonGhidorah 8 років тому +5

    I feel like the saddest part about this was, there was no solution to this. There was no ethically responsible, government regulated company that was willing to sell prescription glasses at a reasonable price.

  • @daywalker3735
    @daywalker3735 8 років тому +5

    that's why I use zennioptical....seven bucks for a pair of glasses, never looked back lol

  • @MixedMartialJack
    @MixedMartialJack 8 років тому +35

    so like, if monopolies are illegal, why is this still happening?

    • @marioisawesome8218
      @marioisawesome8218 7 років тому +19

      Hi, I'm -Mr. Crabs- The U.S. and I like money.

    • @michellelincoln9987
      @michellelincoln9987 6 років тому +5

      Luxotica isn't based out of the US though, so they likely escape the same tariffs and taxes US based companies have to cough up and could totally blackball glasses in the US if the US government tried to strongarm them.

    • @TheSaxAppeal
      @TheSaxAppeal 6 років тому +5

      @@michellelincoln9987 even if they were based in the US, our *entire* government is owned by mega corporations like Amazon, Koch Industries, and Walmart.
      It might be illegal, but that doesn't mean the law actually gets enforced

    • @michellelincoln9987
      @michellelincoln9987 6 років тому +3

      to be fair, I don't expect the US government to actually do anything constructive or productive
      some of the biggest criminals in this country are the politician...like the president
      this is why I said "if"

    • @michellelincoln9987
      @michellelincoln9987 6 років тому +2

      Also, the only real reason the US government broke up monopolies like Ma Bell and Standard Oil is cuz they weren't getting their fair (i.e. the lion's share) of the money these companies were raking in

  • @torenatkinson1986
    @torenatkinson1986 6 років тому +5

    So the 20% of eyeglass brands NOT controlled by Luxotica are.....??? Same question for eyeglass stores

  • @debendragurung3033
    @debendragurung3033 5 років тому +8

    She is so full of talents. I wonder why she hasn't made it to the mainstream.

  • @Gotenblitzem
    @Gotenblitzem 8 років тому +15

    Eye doctors tried to force me to get glasses even though I have perfect vision

    • @tetragon2137
      @tetragon2137 8 років тому +9

      I would keep an "eye" on your eyesight, though. There's a chance your vision is starting to ever so slightly deteriorate, or, as in my case, your eyesight gets steadily worse, but you don't notice it because you're getting used to it. Get a second opinion at a different optometrist.

    • @Bradman175
      @Bradman175 7 років тому

      james lee Well my eye doctor said no need.

    • @tubertz
      @tubertz 7 років тому

      My doctor told me I had 20/50 vision when I can see perfectly fine... Lol how much does Luxatica pay our doctors

    • @roo6853
      @roo6853 7 років тому +3

      UA-camrtz 20/40 is the legal driving limit. Luxottica pays nothing. And neither do any of the other companies that exist (despite what this video says). A true optometrist cares about the health of your eyes and functional vision (especially when driving) driving without proper correction could injure not only yourself, but others that share the road with you.

    • @TheKBrosTech
      @TheKBrosTech 6 років тому +1

      UA-camrtz
      It might mean that your DOMINANT eye is your good one, so you've never truly noticed the deterioration... Try closing one eye and then the other.
      If you still see just fine, then have that eye exam redone

  • @dezert956
    @dezert956 6 років тому +5

    That moment you try to push up your glasses and realize you took them off so you just awkwardly tap the middle of your face

  • @ksub91
    @ksub91 5 років тому +2

    I live in Sweden, and we have the same brands as anywhere else, i.e. basically everything is owned by Luxottica. But I’ve been thinking of going to Smarteyes instead of the one I go to now, because Smarteyes is cheaper. Turns out none of their glasses are Luxottica, so That explains why they’re cheaper. I thought the cheapness had to do with quality.

  • @ViridianBorage
    @ViridianBorage 8 років тому +5

    About 60$ for glasses in Canada not 400$, and many small stores that sell for 20$ for sunglasses and 60$ for prescribed

    • @brandondemeyer5234
      @brandondemeyer5234 6 років тому

      Viridian Borage yes I'm in America they're just garbage just about as I expect that they are in Canada