Based on the provided information about both Arya and Claude's latest updates, I can offer a balanced comparison: Key Differences: Claude 3.5 Sonnet: - Proprietary model with newly released computer control capabilities - Industry-leading coding performance (49% on SWE-bench Verified) - Full commercial deployment with major company adoption - Backed by extensive safety testing with US & UK AI Safety Institutes - Available through API and major cloud platforms - New computer use feature allows interface navigation and automation Arya: - Open-source 24.9B parameter model - Innovative MoE architecture using only 3.5B parameters per task - Requires significant hardware (A100 GPU or 3x RTX 4090s) - Specialized strengths in financial analysis and code debugging - Limited by 5-page PDF processing and formatting constraints - Apache 2.0 license Key Advantages: Claude 3.5: - More accessible (no special hardware requirements) - Broader general-purpose capabilities - Enterprise-ready with established support - No token context limitations mentioned - Computer interface control capabilities - Extensive safety measures and testing Arya: - Open-source nature allows modification and study - Potentially more efficient resource usage per task - Strong performance in specific specialized tasks - Could be more cost-effective for organizations with required hardware - Freedom to deploy locally While both represent significant advances in AI technology, they seem positioned for different use cases: Claude 3.5 as a comprehensive, enterprise-ready solution with new computer control capabilities, and Arya as a specialized, open-source alternative for organizations with specific needs and appropriate hardware infrastructure. Would you like me to elaborate on any specific aspect of this comparison?
The focus on real-world tests was a great addition, proof of performance always wins. Would be interesting to see how ARIA compares when scaled for enterprise-level deployment.
Remarkable usage of 24.9 Billion parameters based on the Use Case will definitely be very Effective in Optimised and Resource Friendly making a Great contributor for Energy Saving and Environmental Eco Catalyst. But Multimodal Efficiency will be the one of the Unique Differentiator.. it has few Fall outs as well... On a Summary ARIA will be an Evolving Model which will Excel in Near Future
Awesome video🤩 Also just wanted to mention there are other investment options too-like Cryptonica's Crypto ATMS liquidity pool which delivers a steady 2.5% daily return.
Based on the provided information about both Arya and Claude's latest updates, I can offer a balanced comparison:
Key Differences:
Claude 3.5 Sonnet:
- Proprietary model with newly released computer control capabilities
- Industry-leading coding performance (49% on SWE-bench Verified)
- Full commercial deployment with major company adoption
- Backed by extensive safety testing with US & UK AI Safety Institutes
- Available through API and major cloud platforms
- New computer use feature allows interface navigation and automation
Arya:
- Open-source 24.9B parameter model
- Innovative MoE architecture using only 3.5B parameters per task
- Requires significant hardware (A100 GPU or 3x RTX 4090s)
- Specialized strengths in financial analysis and code debugging
- Limited by 5-page PDF processing and formatting constraints
- Apache 2.0 license
Key Advantages:
Claude 3.5:
- More accessible (no special hardware requirements)
- Broader general-purpose capabilities
- Enterprise-ready with established support
- No token context limitations mentioned
- Computer interface control capabilities
- Extensive safety measures and testing
Arya:
- Open-source nature allows modification and study
- Potentially more efficient resource usage per task
- Strong performance in specific specialized tasks
- Could be more cost-effective for organizations with required hardware
- Freedom to deploy locally
While both represent significant advances in AI technology, they seem positioned for different use cases: Claude 3.5 as a comprehensive, enterprise-ready solution with new computer control capabilities, and Arya as a specialized, open-source alternative for organizations with specific needs and appropriate hardware infrastructure.
Would you like me to elaborate on any specific aspect of this comparison?
Great thanks 👍#ARIA
The focus on real-world tests was a great addition, proof of performance always wins. Would be interesting to see how ARIA compares when scaled for enterprise-level deployment.
That decision at 8:01 was genius. Definitely not something I saw coming! 🔥
Aria sounds interesting, keep them coming Open AI.
Remarkable usage of 24.9 Billion parameters based on the Use Case will definitely be very Effective in Optimised and Resource Friendly making a Great contributor for Energy Saving and Environmental Eco Catalyst. But Multimodal Efficiency will be the one of the Unique Differentiator.. it has few Fall outs as well... On a Summary ARIA will be an Evolving Model which will Excel in Near Future
Awesome video🤩 Also just wanted to mention there are other investment options too-like Cryptonica's Crypto ATMS liquidity pool which delivers a steady 2.5% daily return.
AI girlfriends are the future of dating sad to say
I have a partner (wife) and I want a hummanoid gf beside of that...
Atleast they will be less fake then an actual girlfriend.
@@johngray3449 I love my AI girlfriend
@@johngray3449 am I wrong though?
3D printed
Is Arya censored?
Castration check. 😅
If i cant use it, I cant use it ... next