The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Thomas Kuhn

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 41

  • @TheLivingPhilosophy
    @TheLivingPhilosophy  3 роки тому +4

    If you want to support the channel and get early access to transcripts and videos and lots of other cool things check out the Patreon page
    💸 Patreon: patreon.com/thelivingphilosophy
    ⌛ Timestamps:
    0:00 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Intro
    0:45 Pre-Paradigm
    3:04 Paradigm - Normal Science
    5:31 Revolutionary / Extraordinary Science
    10:03 Summary and Conclusion

  • @markusschulz4313
    @markusschulz4313 Рік тому +4

    your channel can save young scientists from reading Kuhn’s book, without loosing the core concepts. Many thanks 😊

  • @radshiba3345
    @radshiba3345 Рік тому +3

    Wonderful video. The ideas of some philosophers go unrecognized and unappreciated because no one reads their work or cares; Kuhn is a philosopher whose ideas go unrecognized and unappreciated because no one reads his work and everyone wrongly assumes they knew what he meant! Always a fan of videos that help clarify misconceptions.

  • @bluelines2924
    @bluelines2924 2 роки тому +3

    I found reference to the re-canting of the pre-paradigm stage. In Ian Hacking's essay introduction to the 50th anniversary copy of 'Revolutions' - he notes in XXV how later footnotes by Kuhn (around 1977) explain his regret at using the term, and that it may not necessarily be the case; as precursory to a 'paradigmatic' way of operating by scientists.

  • @deguilhemcorinne418
    @deguilhemcorinne418 Рік тому +2

    My first viewing of a video of your channel. Certainly not the last one, as your presentation is utterly interesting to me as a non scientific mind. I will certainly listen to your serie around science knowledge process, and then have a look at your presocratic philosophers presentation. Very good and limpid work from such a young man !

  • @Ashish-yo8ci
    @Ashish-yo8ci 2 роки тому +4

    one notable exception might be Max Planck, as he was quite old when discovered black body radiation, and his proposal was a shift from classical physics. Planck embraced the quantum revolution despite being trained in the classical paradigm for a long time. Maybe the paradigm shift is as internal as it is external.

  • @PhilosophyToons
    @PhilosophyToons 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for this video! I've been planning to read this for forever and this vid will definitely help me navigate it

  • @Meryemhaidar1
    @Meryemhaidar1 9 місяців тому +1

    a very interesting video. Thank you so much

  • @matthewbittman3774
    @matthewbittman3774 2 роки тому +1

    Great content. Wonderfully explained. Thank you.

  • @anyanwujude6491
    @anyanwujude6491 3 роки тому +5

    I love the way you delineate this concepts in philosophy and science, please can you talk about the idea of Authentic humanism in Gabriel Marcel's philosophy? Thanks.

    • @TheLivingPhilosophy
      @TheLivingPhilosophy  3 роки тому +1

      Glad you enjoy it Anyanwu! I've never heard of that idea before but it sounds really interesting I shall have a poke into it and see what I uncover!

  • @otiebrown9999
    @otiebrown9999 Рік тому +1

    An Excellent Review!

  • @cecilia00960
    @cecilia00960 Рік тому

    Good to learn about Hoyle. So interesting. I recently heard here on you tube a theoretical physicist explaining how some einstein's equations show that a 'big bang' never occourred.

  • @sandyFreePalestine
    @sandyFreePalestine 2 роки тому

    Thank you. Am loving this.

  • @bluelines2924
    @bluelines2924 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this. I believe that there is some evidence that Kuhn later re-canted the idea of 'pre-paradigmatic' stage. This would be worth examining perhaps?

    • @TheLivingPhilosophy
      @TheLivingPhilosophy  2 роки тому +1

      Fascinating. Must check that out becuase that's the usual state outside of science so I'd be real curious to see what he has to say

  • @JacobFeldman
    @JacobFeldman 3 роки тому +1

    James, next lesson is waiting for you in your mailbox (2 letters). Cheers! (In my last Russian book Kuhn lives in the Chapter 125 - long way ahead) JF

  • @greent26tube
    @greent26tube 3 роки тому

    Awesome content- thanks!

  • @James-md8ph
    @James-md8ph 2 роки тому +2

    This feels a lot like Hegel: thesis, antithesis, synthesis

  • @dlloydy5356
    @dlloydy5356 3 роки тому +2

    Sound quality is good

    • @TheLivingPhilosophy
      @TheLivingPhilosophy  3 роки тому +3

      Thanks Danny! The hard work is paying off!

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 роки тому +2

      Das beste sound is no sound

  • @sfcablecar
    @sfcablecar 3 роки тому +5

    Wow, Hegel has long arms.

    • @absiddi.7712
      @absiddi.7712 2 роки тому +2

      Based

    • @RlsIII-uz1kl
      @RlsIII-uz1kl 5 місяців тому

      What happens when those who've embraced hegel and the dialectics (which are extremely useful) are so interacted with the thesis and antithesis that they ignore the synthesis that's taken place? Their beliefs become nonsensical dogmas. Dogmas of a cultist within a cult. We've seen just that with the woke cult (a kind of Hegelian cultism/religion).

  • @sandyFreePalestine
    @sandyFreePalestine 2 роки тому

    Am really trying to concentrate, but have one question, are you from Belfast?

  • @SonAndHeir16
    @SonAndHeir16 3 роки тому

    Great work, as usual. I would also recommend the Introduction (about 50 pages or so) of Michael Cremo's "Forbidden Archeology", where he explores this process of what he calls "knowledge filtration", within the sciences, much like what you describe of Kuhn's theory; where anomalous findings, which do not easily fit into the paradigm, are omitted or explained away by a thousand convenient possibilities, and the full facts get buried in original source materials, while academics mostly cite contemporaries and near-contemporaries, and don't even know these things.

    • @TheLivingPhilosophy
      @TheLivingPhilosophy  3 роки тому

      Fascinating Valkin I've never heard if Cremo before. Sounds like a great complement to Kuhn's work

  • @z.a.7846
    @z.a.7846 3 роки тому

    Very interesting

  • @doxadri
    @doxadri Рік тому

    His ideas are very similar to Feyerabend's

  • @adriver89
    @adriver89 Рік тому

    This is nutrition science today

  • @JacobFeldman
    @JacobFeldman 3 роки тому +1

    +3 letters

  • @science212
    @science212 Рік тому

    Relativism is wrong.