Best theory, that encompass all theories and all fields of science. (real applications to cure all diseases, neutralize radiation, fusion, and everything you can and can't imagine) ua-cam.com/video/J2UEcrUI0Tw/v-deo.html
@@AlexanderGoncharenko you obviously don't know the full formula. It's E²=(MC²)²+(PC)². You solve for a massless particle and you find that it doesn't carry mass but it does carry momentum(P)
I really need some help, please. Every time I see a depiction of gravity, with the graph paper dipping into a well beneath a massive object, I know that it's wrong, but I can't get my mind to come up with the correct imagery. Gravity can't just be acting in one direction (as depicted here, downward). That "well" must be all around the object, no?
Hi Arvin.. loving your work. What do you think of the Holodeck theory! Apparently, we don't live on an actual planet moving through space in an expanding universe. It only appears as though we do. We actually live inside a hyper-realistic holodeck complex super-structure probably no bigger than the sun, powered by a black hole at its core. Our original species defeated death by uploading their souls into Eternal Computers, but living as a disembodied consciousness for all of eternity in some computer isn't much fun so they recreated their native world (Earth) in the holodeck complex, seeded it with the building blocks of life, waited by the event horizon at the core of the super-structure and then returned some three and a half billion years later so that they could holographically project their souls onto our bodies so that they can feel what it's like to have flesh and blood bodies again and live forever through reincarnations. This is their/our Heaven because a Holodeck scenario is potentially eternal. This is the true nature of our reality. It makes sense. How else can we explain fine-tuning, especially the mass of the neutrino. Our reality was MANUALLY fine-tuned..
I'm a physicist myself and I have to say that the explanations given here are the best way to give people an understanding of the fundamental principles of nature. You would need a lot of mathematics and time dive deeper into this matter. But for the average person this channel is the best one can do. Many thanks to Arvin Ash and keep up the good work!
I’m really into physics I sometimes don’t fully understand things here and feel as though whipping out the pencil and paper and really doing the math would help me get it and visualize it better - but I hear Physics isn’t a good field for work so I can’t really afford to spend years doing this for nothing. What are your thoughts?
The graphics you use are extremely helpful in explaining complex, subtle, and abstract properties. Being bashed over the head with Greek letters and incomprehensible numbers doesn't really help me understand much. You've understood that better than any other Physicist or Cosmologist I follow on UA-cam. Thanks for making Particle Physics comprehensible in such an enjoyable and accessible way.
As a non physicist layman your level of explanation is about perfect for me. With your videos I usually feel I have a better grasp of the concepts at hand and not more confused. Thank you for taking the time and effort to make these.
Great to hear! I try to make these so my mother can understand. But alas, she finds most of my videos too confusing. Lol. But when she does understand it, I feel I got it right.
The feeling you get at the instant you grasp a concept, is one of the best feelings there is. To bad it is so fleeting, just leaving you wanting more. Kind of like drugs. Thank you for feeding my addiction, Arvin.
What a fascinating reality I exist in... 3 years ago I wanted to quit being... what a fool I was... I will never be thankful enough to my parents for keeping me alive... I want to learn and live more and more each passing day...
I had almost ended my life before my teens. Then I went through a war where my people's and country's existence was threatened, been shelled and shot at, lost many relatives and my home, and left my town. Even then, I held to the thoughtless "mantra" instilled by communism: there is no God, all religions are the same. Then at 17, I came across a booklet named "Scientific miracles in the Qur'an", which pointed to a few facts in the Qur'an confirmed by the scientific discoveries of the last 200 years. As I was always interested in science and technology, and spent a lot of time thinking about life and Universe, it didn't take me long to realize I was wrong about God and religions, especially about Islam. Afterwards, the more new facts scientists discovered, especially in the field of physics, astrophysics and quantum mechanics, the more my certainty in faith grew. The Universe is overfilled with wonders if we would just care to look and explore, which, along with deeper and broader thinking, and useful knowledge in general, is greatly encouraged and praised in the Qur'an. In Qur'an, God praises those who know, who study and explore, who use their God-given intellect to ponder and reflect upon God's Creation, which makes them much more able to understand God's power and greatness beyond that of a mere ignoramus. To me, it was just natural that, if God exists, He would want me to know more, not less, and would want me to look at all of humankind, whole Earth and all of Universe as one great creation of one infinitely great, All-Knowing and All-Powerful God. There are instructions in the Qur'an for us to pray to God to increase our knowledge and expand our minds/understanding, which is one of my greatest wishes. It also says that of all the trees on Earth were pens and all seas/oceans were ink, and if the seas/oceans were filled up additional 7 times, God's words could still not be all written, which points to the immeasurable amount of knowledge and discoveries that could be made, or that we could keep researching and learning, and we could still never reach the end of it. Regarding loving life, I don't love it any more than I did before, especially being even more aware of the miserable condition of most humanity which is overwhelmed by its own ignorance, prejudice and general stupidity. I simply became more aware of the reality and shortness of life and the nature of our creation, and that what really matters where we end up for eternity. Our lives, even on the scale of Earth alone and its timeline, are nothing, before we even start to consider just our own galaxy. Our conscience and self-awareness make us feel immeasurably more important than we really are, and we can't comprehend that we simply didn't exist and that we will simply not exist in a very short time, as if we were never here. Most of us get enough chances to realize the truth and focus on our Creator on Whom everything depends, yet most of us arrogantly and ignorantly refuse and waste our chances. And then some of us either live lives too short or too disabled to have those chances, and such lives simply serve as lessons to others about how short and insignificant our lives are, and how much we were all blessed with healthy minds, bodies and opportunities for achievements. In the end, we all go back to our Creator, and we get to see and "pick the fruits" of our lives.
I feel a little less stupid hearing that nobody else really understands what a charge is. Here I thought it was just me who wasn't getting it. There's a big difference between knowing something exists and understanding it. The difference is that in knowing something you just repeat the words you have been told but when you understand it you can always find words of your own.
That's what I've been trying to get them to do. Search keywords: matter theory marostica. P.S. FranktheDachshund, you might like my video, "Quantum Mechanics Intervention".
Sadly, there's no established Physics Inc. to lobby for money. Capitalist influence on government always favors inertia. The only way to defeat inertia is through revolution.
@@JarodM More like Political BS games to me and Human lives lost and Sufferings are Continuing... This CoVid 19 Pandemic and everything else is Population Controlled, isn't it. ??????????
I can't express how important it is for someone who's understanding is based on intuition rather than pure maths, and hitting endless frustration about the abstract idea of charge and force, to be told 'we don't actually know what charge is' Thank you!
When I first learned about virtual particles, I also imagined two boats on a pond exchanging balls. However, I could never wrap my head around how exchanging balls would lead to attraction, until now. Thanks for always making great content Arvin, by far the best science channel on youtube.
As a non-physicist with a deep interest in physics, I really appreciate your clear explanations of these difficult topics, and especially that you don't hesitate to say "we don't know" when we don't know, rather than stating hypotheses and speculation as fact. And somehow you manage to do this without glossing over details or dumbing things down or condescending to us.
The simplicity with which you explain and the way you put things across shows how much effort and time you put into script and refining it. Thanks and keep up the awesome work
Love ur videos .im 50 years old .i have a grade 9 education but for the sake of my daughter i studied on line particle theory and taught it to her when she was about 9 years old .this really brings back memories and i want to learn it all over again .i think i ran into trouble trying to understand the math in the decay process , if my memory serves me correctly .wasnt there a ...tiger particle or something .the lesson i started witj start by just explaing fundementals and how what we thought was fundemental was not at all .and how we learned to break down to smaller and smaller fundementals up down gluons photons .i wish i had my first study lesson so i coukd start from the beggining so i dont miss a step .but ur videos r great .so much better to get my mind into this instead of the complete mess everything else in this world has turned into
I did find my original lesson on google .its good for begginers to catch up quickly ."particle adventure " the standard model - what the world is made up of .perfect for begginers .
The Theory of Everything is much closer than you think. It is something like what Einstein did with relativity; it isn't discovering something new, it is looking at things from a different way.
Subspace: +ve charge cells (+1 base charge quanta) held together by an ethereal sea of free-flowing -ve charge . SWEET Quantum-Relativity Inertia: Energy lost by a free cell squeezing through the lattice is returned with a kick as the lattice decompresses/refreezes/balances behind Momentum: Free cells have inertia, free chunks form energy loops of cells in front moving to fill -ve space behind. Holes are just -ve charge flow Positron: +ve free cell (+1 elctric charge) pulls in -ve charge that rebounds with curved outflows. Drags cells, vibrates the Lattice Electron: -ve hole (-1) pulls in +ve cells that rebound outwards before stopping or looping back in. Drags -ve charge, vibrates the Lattice Neutrino: Over 50% (else back to empty lattice) out of phase Electron + Positron. Close free cell & hole with tight shared charge loops so tiny mass Proton: 2 positrons (fuzzily) sandwiching/wrapping 1 electron (pep, +1 electric charge). 3 sub parts and long charge loops so mass is large Neutron: Proton + Electron. Electron joins another nucleus proton, (pep)(e)(pep), decays outside via centrifical/vibe force on the dangling electron Alpha Particle: 2N + 2P.. (pep)(e)(pep)+(pep)(e)(pep), 8p-6e = +2 electric charge. -ve core in a +ve shell (PPeePP). Helium: (eAe) ++++: Lattice chunks + holes of various sizes quickly turn to smaller chunks and holes, until electrons, positrons, neutrinos/back to regular lattice Atom: Lattice density increases to the nucleus centre. Outer electrons may be squashed flat on the nucleus surface or pulled away (completely) Weak Force: A nucleus weak point hit hard enough releases alpha particles, neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos and (gamma) light Nuclear Force: Gravity + electric attraction beat repulsion. Fuzzy balloons recursively pulled into spheres. Stretched flux tube joins parted particles Electron Bond: Electron stretched between two +ve nuclei zones. There is also a 6 ins+6 outs charge flow model of electrons and positrons -ve Charge Flow: Continuous, centralised inflows, outflows curve with shallow exit angle. Lateral forces in random directions cancel, else spin Magnetism: Spin-aligned particles have straight and joined so shorter internal flows with longer external loops back. Ferrous matter joins the circuit Gravity: Mass pulls -ve charge from voids that repel more so expand. Higher -ve charge density compresses lattice. Compression waves travel at C Time: Charge density shrinks lattice, slowing charge flow and light as they cross cells in a fixed time. Universal clock? Process synchronisation? Velocity: Higher velocity compresses lattice (Length Contraction) and base processes cross more cells so local time slows (Time+Mass Dilation) Black hole: Drags lattice around (Frame Dragging). Neutrino crystal. Feeding may annihilate core boundary matter to empty lattice (a universe?) Hawking Radiation: Annihilated matter frees trapped -ve charge that radiates in all directions, out of the black hole and into its core Tunnelling: Intrinsic radial energy of positron and electron charge flow directed in one direction for a brief time, possibly travelling at C2, or even C3 Particle Entanglement: Particles linked by charge flows.. Stopping a flow at any point in the network breaks entanglement -- Light Blip: Compressed (+extra?) -ve charge dipole pulls in lattice. Concentrates -ve charge so may deplete voids and add to gravity. Velocity = C Light Wave: Amplitude = number of blipping layers. Shorter wavelength = higher blip frequency = higher wave energy. Peaks concentrate blips Photo-Electric Effect: Light frequency over a threshold determined by atomic mass and valency dislodges an electron on impact Photon Entanglement: Vibrating line of cells like an ultra-fine (spinning?) AC current / Warped line of cells between entangled photons -- Big Bang: Lattice explosion flings charge as matter / Black holes collide so rapid core growth / Black hole hit like a bell / Lattice expansion/growth Steady State: Universe could grow slowly. A big hit may start simultaneous (patchy) matter formation across the whole universe, not from a point Boxed Universe: If voids can't expand when they lose -ve charge to matter gravity wells are steeper with more compressed lattice Flow/Gradient: As stationary as possible -ve charge density gradient vs -ve charge continuously flowing from voids to centres of gravity and back Vacuum Fluctuations: Continuous flow could create dark matter whirlpools. Neutrino collisions, light-neutrino interactions. Background radiation
Conservation: Everything is conserved - but if a black hole core annihilates matter to empty lattice that absorbs the energy the information is lost PROS: Simpler, semi-symmetric, recursive, realistic, 3D/4D, self-contained, open/closed, (in)finite, (semi)conformal, cyclic , (un)balancing -- This isn't any form of science, not even pseudoscience. It is materialist make-believe in-mind modelling minus maths. A self-contained quantum-relativistic universe/multiverse using the fewest base particles and forces (2+1). The above quark free variant is one of many possibilities. Powerful premise.... The Lattice is everything, there is no nothing, no thing is perfectly still, balanced lattice. Space is Cartesian everywhere and there is probably not (much) truly empty lattice containing no thing(s). There is no before or after The Eternal Lattice, there is no outside and The Lattice knows everything because it is everything - except a (collective) conscious entity. LOL!
I believe that whatever space-time is, dark matter or higgs field, I think pulsars generate electromagnetic field by twisting them. If space-time is a elastic structure, we can combine all forces.
I feel healed when watching Arvin Ash's videos. Like he reads a book on physics then puts a lot of energy and creativity into making presentable images with a dialogue that is matched with great analogies but keeps the technical formulas and points out which each terms means. Theoretical physics combined with human moral problems is the heart of what our lives are all about
I never ever imagined that an amateur like me would get insights into this level of science in such an instructive way. This channel is so freaking awesome.
My god I LOVE THIS CHANNEL SO MUCH!! This is a true science channel! I might have a hard time following everything but it fascinates me anyway! Big thank you Arvin!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
even though I have to repeat some parts like 10 times, I end up understanding. And that makes me feel really excited. You are one true master explaining phisics to common peope like me, please keep uploading videos, I do REALLY enjoy them (and the animations truly help my lack of imagination). Thanks a lot Arvin
I wish i could met u in person.. its lucky to have a mentor like u.. the level of deepness & clarity in ur voice adds up to your brilliant way of explaining things in layman terms
@@tryagain_ww Country is not Special but it's just a way to let the creator know that people from India are also big fan of his content. Just to make Arvin realise his reach.
@@romishcraft He can see that from his analytics and have you ever seen people say that from other countries No because they know that he can see that from his analytics but we Indians always want to.
After watching this video, I once again realized why I subscribed to this channel already a while ago: it’s just AWESOME!!!! You simply know how to explain extraordinary complex theories in a very understandable manner, I love how you produce your videos, absolutely brilliant, superb narration, sound and visual editing on top level, it never gets boring, I was just mesmerized about the way you explained it all. I have read quite a few books on the subject, mainly written for an audience (like myself), without any higher degree or so. But certain terms and explanations were very familiar to me. Of course, I also have to point out, that even after reading all the books on this subject, it would be naive of me to say that I safely understand the subject in every aspect and detail. A great deal still remains abstract and almost incomprehensible after reading. But in contrast, this fantastic video contributed a HUGE amount to better understand certain key elements or processes. I finally could combine what I had already read (but not fully understood well enough) with your brilliant explanations and so a few things finally made “click” in my mind!!!! I’m so grateful for ever single “mind-click”.... I’m thrilled to bits and realise, that this was a good day.... thank you so much for uploading this great video!!!! Best wishes for you all! Stay healthy and positive!!! Cheers, Steven
I love your videos, they have helped me understand our universe on a completely new level. What puzzles me is that there seems to be little discussion about WHY the 'ruleset' of the fundamental particles and forces is the way it is, and thus what a quantum field could actually look like (in actual, physical terms). The key question is: What is a QF in physical terms that is actually carrying the waves/energy across space (what used to once be called Ether? 😉), and how is it that so many different ones exist layered on top of each other, while only allowing exchange of energy between them according to very precise rules (which is the most fascinating part to me). The physical properties of these fields must likely also be what govern that particles (energy) can only exist in certain quanta in certain QFs in the first place, and may even carry the fundamental explanations for the wave/particle duality of the quantum world. It appears to me as if there must be an entire layer of new physics underneath everything that we know today, and that's not even counting dark energy/matter. Anyway, amateur musings... 😛 Keep up the great videos!
Thanks so much for your generosity. Our understanding of fundamental physics is mathematical. The mathematics of quantum field theory do not indicate that it is made up of anything more basic, or at least as of now, we know of nothing deeper. It is possible that we may find that everything is made of something more fundamental like strings or something else, but no such theory exists currently. For now, QFs are not much more than properties in spacetime, which follow mathematical rules that we can predict. You may be right that there is an entire more fundamental layer of ;physics that we have no clue about. But as of now, it is an unknown unknown.
@@ArvinAsh Thanks for your response! I get what you are saying, but as with all mathematical equations that were developed in history, there's always something fundamentally physical about them. It's just that as you say, currently we have no understanding of what such properties could be and what they truly are in our physical world. But in my mind there's no question about that QF (or whatever we will still discover about them) exist because there's something real and physical there.... It will, however, be for people way smarter than me to figure that out eventually :).
@@haraldriegler6000 i recommend reading james ladyman & don ross's 'every thing must go: naturalised metaphysics'. just because we can construct questions that make grammatical sense, it doesn't mean that any question meaningfully addresses real patterns scale independently. there is no motivation from contemporary fundamental physics to suppose that there are 'individual little things' with intrinsic properties. 'physicality' is utterly mysterious. see Kane B's 2 videos about physicalism. it and naturalism are mostly used to note a refusal to posit 'supernatural' existents.
Sir I am an electronics student , but always liked to read maths and physics, I managed to read very little special relativity from resnick book, very less quantum mechanics from MIT lectures and very little particle physics from David Griffith book first two chapters two years back, As an engineer I always looked/imagined quantum technology as a future. But I only read because I am interested to know, your last two videos on 4 fundamental forces were so good, I immediately liked and subscribed to your channel😍. I am excited to see your other videos in the playlist. Thanks a lot for doing this🙏
Thanks for always being such a cordially person and for explaining such complex matter in a way that I'm always able to understand the subject you're talking about. And thanks for your effort to produce these videos. I'm convinced you're of great help not only to me.
Like always absolutly great this insight how the exchange of virtual particles results in forces. I am an electrical engineer who worked in electro optic area but that's quite a long time ago but still I can follow up to a certain extend. And definitely during your video my neurons are in a higher energy state and afterwards I am in the released state of wondering how great our Universe works.
Just discovered this channel and I am blown away by how good it is. The explanations are excellent and can be followed by anyone that takes the time to watch them. I am a retired Physics teacher and I sure wish I had access to these for my lessons on Quantum electrodynamics. My students would have loved them! Thank you for the superb content!
Do you even realise how valuable this video is!! Literally nowhere else in internet I searched, people touched Actual mechanisms of forces.. They just say it happens due to particle exchange and don't say how
@@ArvinAsh How much, or does it at all, kasimir effect excluding virtual particles forming within massive objects create a pressure gradient of virtual particle pressure between mass and "empty" space?
I got. Magellan when you first did the promo campaign for it. I was so impressed with it that I Kept it well after the trial period! I've downloaded and also kept that one way past the trial period and I'm still have and enjoy them almost daily. Thanks for the hookup my friend!
Excellent video! To the best of my ability, virtually nothing said was actually incorrect, which believe me, is _very_ uncommon, and meant as high praise. I think this is probably the closest it's possible to come to fully explaining the forces of the Standard Model in pop-science terminology. I very much appreciated that you were careful to use correct terminology like pointing out that it is only *virtual* particles that moderate the forces, not real ones. That one word, "virtual" gets left out a lot, and while other physicists may "know what we mean", to a lay-person that can generate rather a lot of unnecessary confusion. Literally the only thing I might have changed is that I wish you hadn't used the word "exist" quite so insistently with regards to virtual particles, and perhaps at least gave a nod to the notion that the particle-centric view presented here is just a useful formalism, not the underlying reality (which is all about excitations in fields). Otherwise, this was close to perfect. If anyone reading this found this video completely understandable and thinks they are ready for the next level, I highly recommend Dr. Sean Carroll's recent series, "The Biggest Ideas in the Universe". It's quite a bit more technical than this, and uses the real underlying mathematics (in simplified form). In any case, _excellent_ description and depiction of QCD and QED! Great work, very well presented, and with just enough care taken to include enough careful and correct terminology to perhaps entice people into following further down the rabbit hole. ;)
Thanks, I appreciate that! Regarding QFT, I have a dedicated video on that. The problem with introducing that in every "particle" video, I've found, is very confusing for most people without having watched that video first. I try to make all videos self-contained so that people do not have to view a prior video to understand the current one. But I agree, everything is fields so any talk of particles is an approximation for visualization purposes.
@@ArvinAsh You know, there's a topic I've never seen anyone cover very well in an approachable manner. I'm not sure if it's something you'd be interested in making a video on, but I would definitely be interested in watching it if you did. The topic is the Pauli Exclusion Principle, specifically the apparent forces it generates (which in some estimation forms the majority of the 'solid-ness' of macroscopic objects, so it's not a trivial topic!) I've seen plenty of hand-wavey mentions of it with regards to degeneracy pressure in white dwarves and neutron stars, a fair number of nods toward it in explanations of electron orbitals in physical chemistry, and a rare few mentions of its importance to the everyday world... but nobody I'm aware of has really gone in depth, in an approachable pop-science way about _where_ that pressure comes from, why it seems to create forces on even the macroscopic scale, and why we don't consider it to be "a force" with a virtual particle moderating it and so forth. The closest I've seen anybody come is Sean Carroll in his Big Ideas Q&A on Atoms, but all he really said was, to paraphrase, "Once you get to the level of physics where you're worrying about the Pauli Exclusion Principle as a source of pressure and force, you should be well beyond needing to think of _any_ of the forces as moderated by particles; it's all fields and interactions in fields." While that's technically true, it's not a very satisfying answer. Even for someone who _does_ understand the field version of such things reasonably well, it's dissatisfying that nobody has managed to put these topics and questions into terms that give a real intuition about it.
So many comments have expressed what I want to say about how well you have explained these concepts so simply yet thoroughly! I echo what they have said here! Thanks for all you have done and will do! I look forward to humanity's search for the GUT and its answer with great eagerness!
I'm such a layman in this topics but I love to know more about physics and especially quantum physics. You give me this knowledge in a simple understandable way. Thanks a million!
Thank you a lot for these videos Arvin, since secondary school it is somehow postulated that particles repel and attract due to some forces and then they go on from there with field and wave theory, all can be transmitted through vacuum (understood as nothingness) which is really really weird. Thank you for trying to heal our existential doubts by tackling the underlying mechanism of transmission of these forces.
Really intense. Wish this was on TV. Best part was the ending "The theory of everything will not be the end" Each answer only brings more questions. May we do kind things with this knowledge.
Pardon me, for calling you "UA-camr". I do know you and your content are much more than this. I just had a temporary lack of words, or maybe is not that temporary as now still struggle.
When I learn and observe more, my world becomes larger. Seems like the more I know, the more I realize that there is so much that I don't know. Sounds weird but it's true.
10:50 so what about this quark, that is pulled back into the proton? is it „weaker/lighter“ quark(since it losts some of its energy, that is transormed into mezon)? is it still proton, if it consists of this „weaker“ quark? it should not be, right?
@@cardboard_hat thanks for reply, only i still don´t understand, how it could be same quark, when it gave up part of itself to create mezon; this would break law of matter/energy coservation...
Great way of explaining this :) I regularly learn more from watching a 10 min video on UA-cam then 10 years at school because at school you do not learn how things work (you only learn that it exist)...
QCD is one of those things that makes me wonder if it’s some sort of hint at some yet more fundamental property of matter and energy than we’ve yet uncovered. Fascinating and mind-bending stuff to be sure. Stay well out there everybody, and Jesus Christ be with you friends.😊
Wow Arvin! What an amazing description. Never pursued science in my higher studies, but still figured every part of your video. That explains the effort you put in to simplify the concepts of physics. Thank you with all my heart! The colour charge bit was extremely fascinating for me! Subscribing to your channel. Thanks for your beautiful service. Regards!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
Love this video. So informative. We absolutely need a quantum theory of gravity because we know gravity interacts with quantum particles, it will bend light waves for instance. But do the strong force and gravity have to be unified with the weak force and electromagnetism? Could they just be fundamentally different and not be combinable? Of course if that could be proven to be true and reasons were shown why those forces could not unite that would be a very groundbreaking theory in its own right. Lastly could the Higgs field giving mass to fundamental particles be considered a fifth force?
I think we will find a GUT - combining Strong with Electroweak a lot sooner than we will find a TOE. Gravity is just very difficult to deal with at Quantum scales. Higgs is considered a 5th "force" by many if not most scientists. I ignored it for the moment for simplification, but will have several dedicated videos on this in the future.
Hey Arvin I know you probably won’t see this but I’ve been working on this hypothesis and I’d love to hear your opinion on it. How the universe started? Blank space with complex equations before Big Bang Complex equations could be mathematical rules that particles have to follow, spin, charge etc. The “Fabric of space” is just the dimension that the particles interact with “The fabric of Space” or in quantum field theory, a field that particles oscillate in. String theory says that these oscillations are just vibrating strings, quantum field theory says this is energy. With this in mind the only two things that are “reality” and can interact with “reality” are energy/movement/vibrations in strings/however you define the packets of energy that make up the fundamental particles. The other is space or the field that the particles can interact with. The field must contain information on how the particles interact with it; “complex equations” which are rules for how the particles interact with the field. The particles/energy in the field have the values (Eg. charge spin mass) that determine how the field acts on the particles or how the particles act on the field. With that in mind before the Big Bang the only thing that existed was space, which is just a field that gives rules on how particles act within it. The BigBang was a massive infinitely compressed ball of energy, the energy interacted with the field and “created” particles releasing more energy. The explosion was the rapid formations of particles producing energy. The bigbang was “energy” being added to space. This would mean that the point beyond space, the border where the universe has not expanded to, is just a field with no energy in it (no virtual particles either) This theory only has one field instead of the QFDs 9 fields, a particle is a packet of “energy”, different amounts of energy determine the particle. You do not need 9 fields to explain something that requires one. Here are some other non-complete thoughts/theory’s Dark energy causes the expansion of space that particles can travel within Dark energy may be a different kind of energy that interacts with the “energy field” (space). Although it is possible it occupies its on type of field, I believe the same could be true with Dark Matter. Entangled particles are “stopped” in time. Like so Arvin can see
Really really great video! I have watched a ton of these types of videos, but this one hits a sweet spot of information organization. Imo, it sidesteps the confusion of just what is a virtual particle and allows the viewer to focus on the more important basics of QCD. QCD is when most of us viewers sometimes get lost. As for the virtual particles, imo, an important realization for a curios learner of quantum physics is this: It’s all fields. “Particles” virtual or otherwise are not tiny indivisible balls. “Particles” are modes in the fundamental fields of nature. The ground state (minimum state, nothing added) is not zero, it has a minimal mode as well. These can not be measured by themself, because you have to add more modes (need something there to measure) but the effect of the ground state modes are directly observable. Physicists use the term “particle” to mean something different than what most learners think that word means. This is quite a challenge to the popularization of real quantum physics to a broad audience. If there was a better term available that would not immediately confuse an average viewer, then surely that would be preferable.
If mesons are the particles that bind protons and neutrons then there is something pulling quarks to create mesons right?sry if this is a stupid question...
The residual color charge-to-color charge interactions between protons and neutrons creates virtual mesons that mediate the attraction between them at very close range.
@@ArvinAsh I have multiple times lauded your ability to wield such intricate topics so adeptly and I will do it again. I think that the current physics we have are inextricably interwined with the Uncertainty principle and I think we first have to understand this principle to then transition to the rest of the content quantum theory encloses . But to profoundly understand the principle you need to first now maths ( Lorentz Transforms ) . Could you do such a video in the future?
Thank you for this. I've tried to read papers dedicated to weak force and strong force and it has always confused me. Especially when the colors/spins are involved with quarks. This really helped visualize how and why those two 'Forces' make things happen the way they do.
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
Arvin, I've always loved your graphical examples of how complex mechanisms work. Creating visual interpretations really helps us to learn the concepts better. Thanks for you & your team, and keep up the great work!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
Great video, as always. I am a phyicisist (not doing basic reasearch for a loooong time).These videos help me to remember all the stuff I once had to learn. The key messages, at last. Amazing, thank you!
Sir, thank you for the video. The knowledge density of this video is quite much. I have few questions: 1. Why are there specifically 2 charges in electromagnetism and three (colors) in strong nuclear force? Do they pop out of an equation? 2. How to make sense of unified forces, how to understand them? 3. Why is there the need of more than 2 bosons (z boson) for weak nuclear force? 4. Why don't neutrons decay directly to an electron and anti-neutrino? Why is the W- required to mediate? 5. What is responsible for the creation of those virtual photons, and how do they differ from real photons? Also, as the universe is filled up with virtual particles poping in and out of existence, how come virtual photons dodge them and reach the destination charge? Thanks a lot, sir!
Enough questions for a whole course on the Standard Model! All 3 interactions are derived using pretty much the same scheme from certain symmetries. The symmetry groups for the strong, weak and EM interactions are SU(3), SU(2) and U(1). SU(3) gives you 3 color charges and 8 (3x3-1) gauge bosons, gluons, the generators of that symmetry group. SU(2) ties 2 kinds of leptons in each generation, with 3 (2x2-1) gauge bosons (2 W bosons and 1 Z), and U(1) group is about 1 particle at a time (so it doesn't change the particle type, unlike other interactions) and the positive and negative charges really come from two directions you can change the phase of a complex number which is used in all wave functions. Unification of forces means finding a single group from which that set can be derived via symmetry breaking. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_theory en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_formulation_of_the_Standard_Model en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking theoreticalminimum.com/courses/particle-physics-2-standard-model/2010/winter
This should be titled The Three Fundamental Forces + Gravity. Arvin you clearly stated that, according to Einstein, gravity is not a force and then proceeded to brilliantly explain why in your videos.
There is subtlety that I probably did not convey emphatically enough. Gravity is not a force ACCORDING TO general relativity. However, most physicists, as well as I, believe that general relativity is incomplete. A more comprehensive theory of gravity, which would include its behavior at quantum scales, probably will show that it is a force.
I don't really comment on youtube but your videos are awesome! I've been binge watching them non-stop. Please continue to do the great work you're doing!
I've been through a lot of physics videos and yours still strike me as the most informational and simple. You also have a way of staying impartial from the topic as an observer. I commend you for that!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
thankyou so much for your videos i am going to cambridge studying natsci next year and your videos have sustained a passion for the sciences that motivates me throughout my education
Your videos are fantastic sir. Your passion for science can be heard and it comes through so clear. You explain things simply enough for most of the general population to understand it without simplifying it so much that the truth gets muddled. Even better, you have primer videos that provide the information needed to understand your more in depth explanations. It was educators that had your style and capability that kept me engaged in school, even if the subject was boring/dry or when I'd already finished the textbook and was waiting out the semester. I truly enjoy learning and you make it so much easier to understand complex theories like this one. I wish you the best and continued success with you channel!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
Bro really appreciate you. The way you explain the things is just really awesome. I have watched many videos on youTube but mostly all of them has no logic at all. Thanks and keep in going making such videos and aspiring people to know more about the amazing world. Thank You.
Hi Arvin Sir, This is The Learner's Show and I have a Doubt - Do Wormholes Really Exists, How big or small are they, can we find one of them in future or have we found, Do interstellar journey possible with Wormholes, what will be the effect of it on our body, where will it led us to ? Can You Explain Wormholes easily 👍
No wormholes have ever been detected. It comes from the math of General Relativity. They can theoretically exist, but exotic matter (negative energy or mass) is required to create them. They are probably impossible.
Part I or precursor of this video is located here: ua-cam.com/video/669QUJrF4u0/v-deo.html
Best theory, that encompass all theories and all fields of science. (real applications to cure all diseases, neutralize radiation, fusion, and everything you can and can't imagine) ua-cam.com/video/J2UEcrUI0Tw/v-deo.html
Photons don't have mass, but they still have energy, which is ignored in the formula
@@AlexanderGoncharenko you obviously don't know the full formula. It's E²=(MC²)²+(PC)². You solve for a massless particle and you find that it doesn't carry mass but it does carry momentum(P)
I really need some help, please. Every time I see a depiction of gravity, with the graph paper dipping into a well beneath a massive object, I know that it's wrong, but I can't get my mind to come up with the correct imagery. Gravity can't just be acting in one direction (as depicted here, downward). That "well" must be all around the object, no?
Hi Arvin.. loving your work. What do you think of the Holodeck theory! Apparently, we don't live on an actual planet moving through space in an expanding universe. It only appears as though we do. We actually live inside a hyper-realistic holodeck complex super-structure probably no bigger than the sun, powered by a black hole at its core. Our original species defeated death by uploading their souls into Eternal Computers, but living as a disembodied consciousness for all of eternity in some computer isn't much fun so they recreated their native world (Earth) in the holodeck complex, seeded it with the building blocks of life, waited by the event horizon at the core of the super-structure and then returned some three and a half billion years later so that they could holographically project their souls onto our bodies so that they can feel what it's like to have flesh and blood bodies again and live forever through reincarnations. This is their/our Heaven because a Holodeck scenario is potentially eternal. This is the true nature of our reality.
It makes sense. How else can we explain fine-tuning, especially the mass of the neutrino. Our reality was MANUALLY fine-tuned..
I wish i could live a longer time to see the future discoveries of what reality really is....
Yeah I have the same wish
Entropy comes in your way
Not only discover it's nature, but also overcome it's grasp.
I think we will figure out lots of stuff in the future but always discover more questions than what we can solve.
Just hope that AI comes into existence and answers these
I'm a physicist myself and I have to say that the explanations given here are the best way to give people an understanding of the fundamental principles of nature. You would need a lot of mathematics and time dive deeper into this matter. But for the average person this channel is the best one can do. Many thanks to Arvin Ash and keep up the good work!
Thanks. And you're screen name is a tribute to one of the greatest.
I’m really into physics I sometimes don’t fully understand things here and feel as though whipping out the pencil and paper and really doing the math would help me get it and visualize it better - but I hear Physics isn’t a good field for work so I can’t really afford to spend years doing this for nothing. What are your thoughts?
"I'm a physicist myself"
- Richard Feynman
@@greatestever2903 Did a science degree, physics honours. Can't recommend the job prospects. If you want a job go do engineering.
Every individual has the fundamental right to learn PHYSICS(Nature)
I’m happy that youtube has this kind of higher-detail science content
@@xxxh4x0rxxx21 how so
PBS Spacetime is great too
Lmao 😂. UA-cam doesn’t have science content. UA-cam is an open forum hence the name UA-cam
People form a channel and post videos not UA-cam
Mike Eagle oh ok cool. You’re rude, Mike 👍🏻
Chris B Lmao 😂. Oh you didn’t know that’s what happened on the UA-cam science channel.
The graphics you use are extremely helpful in explaining complex, subtle, and abstract properties. Being bashed over the head with Greek letters and incomprehensible numbers doesn't really help me understand much. You've understood that better than any other Physicist or Cosmologist I follow on UA-cam. Thanks for making Particle Physics comprehensible in such an enjoyable and accessible way.
Yeah, math is useful, but not fun for conceptualizing reality, which is what I fundamentally care about. Having an intuitive reasoning of the world.
As a non physicist layman your level of explanation is about perfect for me. With your videos I usually feel I have a better grasp of the concepts at hand and not more confused. Thank you for taking the time and effort to make these.
I feel the same.
Great to hear! I try to make these so my mother can understand. But alas, she finds most of my videos too confusing. Lol. But when she does understand it, I feel I got it right.
The feeling you get at the instant you grasp a concept, is one of the best feelings there is.
To bad it is so fleeting, just leaving you wanting more. Kind of like drugs.
Thank you for feeding my addiction, Arvin.
Happy to be your "drug" dealer!
That is curiosity, a very healthy thing.
@@honeybabou6119 Unless it's about unhealthy or prohibited things.
What a fascinating reality I exist in... 3 years ago I wanted to quit being... what a fool I was... I will never be thankful enough to my parents for keeping me alive... I want to learn and live more and more each passing day...
I had almost ended my life before my teens.
Then I went through a war where my people's and country's existence was threatened, been shelled and shot at, lost many relatives and my home, and left my town.
Even then, I held to the thoughtless "mantra" instilled by communism: there is no God, all religions are the same.
Then at 17, I came across a booklet named "Scientific miracles in the Qur'an", which pointed to a few facts in the Qur'an confirmed by the scientific discoveries of the last 200 years.
As I was always interested in science and technology, and spent a lot of time thinking about life and Universe, it didn't take me long to realize I was wrong about God and religions, especially about Islam.
Afterwards, the more new facts scientists discovered, especially in the field of physics, astrophysics and quantum mechanics, the more my certainty in faith grew.
The Universe is overfilled with wonders if we would just care to look and explore, which, along with deeper and broader thinking, and useful knowledge in general, is greatly encouraged and praised in the Qur'an.
In Qur'an, God praises those who know, who study and explore, who use their God-given intellect to ponder and reflect upon God's Creation, which makes them much more able to understand God's power and greatness beyond that of a mere ignoramus.
To me, it was just natural that, if God exists, He would want me to know more, not less, and would want me to look at all of humankind, whole Earth and all of Universe as one great creation of one infinitely great, All-Knowing and All-Powerful God.
There are instructions in the Qur'an for us to pray to God to increase our knowledge and expand our minds/understanding, which is one of my greatest wishes.
It also says that of all the trees on Earth were pens and all seas/oceans were ink, and if the seas/oceans were filled up additional 7 times, God's words could still not be all written, which points to the immeasurable amount of knowledge and discoveries that could be made, or that we could keep researching and learning, and we could still never reach the end of it.
Regarding loving life, I don't love it any more than I did before, especially being even more aware of the miserable condition of most humanity which is overwhelmed by its own ignorance, prejudice and general stupidity.
I simply became more aware of the reality and shortness of life and the nature of our creation, and that what really matters where we end up for eternity.
Our lives, even on the scale of Earth alone and its timeline, are nothing, before we even start to consider just our own galaxy.
Our conscience and self-awareness make us feel immeasurably more important than we really are, and we can't comprehend that we simply didn't exist and that we will simply not exist in a very short time, as if we were never here.
Most of us get enough chances to realize the truth and focus on our Creator on Whom everything depends, yet most of us arrogantly and ignorantly refuse and waste our chances.
And then some of us either live lives too short or too disabled to have those chances, and such lives simply serve as lessons to others about how short and insignificant our lives are, and how much we were all blessed with healthy minds, bodies and opportunities for achievements.
In the end, we all go back to our Creator, and we get to see and "pick the fruits" of our lives.
I feel a little less stupid hearing that nobody else really understands what a charge is. Here I thought it was just me who wasn't getting it. There's a big difference between knowing something exists and understanding it. The difference is that in knowing something you just repeat the words you have been told but when you understand it you can always find words of your own.
Statistically I've got about 25 years left, so come on physicists, lobby that money and get busy I need to know!
We are trying 😂 But indeed there is more money needed. Especially compared to stupid and shortsighted things like military, war etc💰
Human greed slows down progress Gentlemen.
That's what I've been trying to get them to do. Search keywords: matter theory marostica. P.S. FranktheDachshund, you might like my video, "Quantum Mechanics Intervention".
Sadly, there's no established Physics Inc. to lobby for money. Capitalist influence on government always favors inertia. The only way to defeat inertia is through revolution.
@@JarodM More like Political BS games to me and Human lives lost and Sufferings are Continuing...
This CoVid 19 Pandemic and everything else is Population Controlled, isn't it. ??????????
I can't express how important it is for someone who's understanding is based on intuition rather than pure maths, and hitting endless frustration about the abstract idea of charge and force, to be told 'we don't actually know what charge is' Thank you!
Definitely the best physics channel I have met on YT. It deserves millions of views. Particularly the pace of the speech of the host is very pleasing.
When I first learned about virtual particles, I also imagined two boats on a pond exchanging balls. However, I could never wrap my head around how exchanging balls would lead to attraction, until now. Thanks for always making great content Arvin, by far the best science channel on youtube.
Happy to help. Thank you. I appreciate that. See you in the next video my friend.
The boomerang example was a help for me.
No it's the opposite. Exchanging balls is repulsion and the boomerang exchanging is attraction!?
@@bengoody595 Thanks.. that right.
@@bengoody595 Yes, roughly speaking this is the way an exchange of virtual particles would occur.
I JUST FOUND THIS CHANNEL AND I CANT STOP WATCHING MUST LEARN IT ALL MUST LEARN EVERYTHING AHHHHHH
👁 🧠 👁
👄
Your brain is smaller than your mouth.
@@anonymousmobster2444 This is a unintentionally good quote.
As a non-physicist with a deep interest in physics, I really appreciate your clear explanations of these difficult topics, and especially that you don't hesitate to say "we don't know" when we don't know, rather than stating hypotheses and speculation as fact. And somehow you manage to do this without glossing over details or dumbing things down or condescending to us.
The simplicity with which you explain and the way you put things across shows how much effort and time you put into script and refining it. Thanks and keep up the awesome work
Love ur videos .im 50 years old .i have a grade 9 education but for the sake of my daughter i studied on line particle theory and taught it to her when she was about 9 years old .this really brings back memories and i want to learn it all over again .i think i ran into trouble trying to understand the math in the decay process , if my memory serves me correctly .wasnt there a ...tiger particle or something .the lesson i started witj start by just explaing fundementals and how what we thought was fundemental was not at all .and how we learned to break down to smaller and smaller fundementals up down gluons photons .i wish i had my first study lesson so i coukd start from the beggining so i dont miss a step .but ur videos r great .so much better to get my mind into this instead of the complete mess everything else in this world has turned into
I did find my original lesson on google .its good for begginers to catch up quickly ."particle adventure " the standard model - what the world is made up of .perfect for begginers .
The Theory of Everything is much closer than you think. It is something like what Einstein did with relativity; it isn't discovering something new, it is looking at things from a different way.
Subspace: +ve charge cells (+1 base charge quanta) held together by an ethereal sea of free-flowing -ve charge
. SWEET Quantum-Relativity
Inertia: Energy lost by a free cell squeezing through the lattice is returned with a kick as the lattice decompresses/refreezes/balances behind
Momentum: Free cells have inertia, free chunks form energy loops of cells in front moving to fill -ve space behind. Holes are just -ve charge flow
Positron: +ve free cell (+1 elctric charge) pulls in -ve charge that rebounds with curved outflows. Drags cells, vibrates the Lattice
Electron: -ve hole (-1) pulls in +ve cells that rebound outwards before stopping or looping back in. Drags -ve charge, vibrates the Lattice
Neutrino: Over 50% (else back to empty lattice) out of phase Electron + Positron. Close free cell & hole with tight shared charge loops so tiny mass
Proton: 2 positrons (fuzzily) sandwiching/wrapping 1 electron (pep, +1 electric charge). 3 sub parts and long charge loops so mass is large
Neutron: Proton + Electron. Electron joins another nucleus proton, (pep)(e)(pep), decays outside via centrifical/vibe force on the dangling electron
Alpha Particle: 2N + 2P.. (pep)(e)(pep)+(pep)(e)(pep), 8p-6e = +2 electric charge. -ve core in a +ve shell (PPeePP). Helium: (eAe)
++++: Lattice chunks + holes of various sizes quickly turn to smaller chunks and holes, until electrons, positrons, neutrinos/back to regular lattice
Atom: Lattice density increases to the nucleus centre. Outer electrons may be squashed flat on the nucleus surface or pulled away (completely)
Weak Force: A nucleus weak point hit hard enough releases alpha particles, neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos and (gamma) light
Nuclear Force: Gravity + electric attraction beat repulsion. Fuzzy balloons recursively pulled into spheres. Stretched flux tube joins parted particles
Electron Bond: Electron stretched between two +ve nuclei zones. There is also a 6 ins+6 outs charge flow model of electrons and positrons
-ve Charge Flow: Continuous, centralised inflows, outflows curve with shallow exit angle. Lateral forces in random directions cancel, else spin
Magnetism: Spin-aligned particles have straight and joined so shorter internal flows with longer external loops back. Ferrous matter joins the circuit
Gravity: Mass pulls -ve charge from voids that repel more so expand. Higher -ve charge density compresses lattice. Compression waves travel at C
Time: Charge density shrinks lattice, slowing charge flow and light as they cross cells in a fixed time. Universal clock? Process synchronisation?
Velocity: Higher velocity compresses lattice (Length Contraction) and base processes cross more cells so local time slows (Time+Mass Dilation)
Black hole: Drags lattice around (Frame Dragging). Neutrino crystal. Feeding may annihilate core boundary matter to empty lattice (a universe?)
Hawking Radiation: Annihilated matter frees trapped -ve charge that radiates in all directions, out of the black hole and into its core
Tunnelling: Intrinsic radial energy of positron and electron charge flow directed in one direction for a brief time, possibly travelling at C2, or even C3
Particle Entanglement: Particles linked by charge flows.. Stopping a flow at any point in the network breaks entanglement
--
Light Blip: Compressed (+extra?) -ve charge dipole pulls in lattice. Concentrates -ve charge so may deplete voids and add to gravity. Velocity = C
Light Wave: Amplitude = number of blipping layers. Shorter wavelength = higher blip frequency = higher wave energy. Peaks concentrate blips
Photo-Electric Effect: Light frequency over a threshold determined by atomic mass and valency dislodges an electron on impact
Photon Entanglement: Vibrating line of cells like an ultra-fine (spinning?) AC current / Warped line of cells between entangled photons
--
Big Bang: Lattice explosion flings charge as matter / Black holes collide so rapid core growth / Black hole hit like a bell / Lattice expansion/growth
Steady State: Universe could grow slowly. A big hit may start simultaneous (patchy) matter formation across the whole universe, not from a point
Boxed Universe: If voids can't expand when they lose -ve charge to matter gravity wells are steeper with more compressed lattice
Flow/Gradient: As stationary as possible -ve charge density gradient vs -ve charge continuously flowing from voids to centres of gravity and back
Vacuum Fluctuations: Continuous flow could create dark matter whirlpools. Neutrino collisions, light-neutrino interactions. Background radiation
Conservation: Everything is conserved - but if a black hole core annihilates matter to empty lattice that absorbs the energy the information is lost
PROS: Simpler, semi-symmetric, recursive, realistic, 3D/4D, self-contained, open/closed, (in)finite, (semi)conformal, cyclic , (un)balancing
--
This isn't any form of science, not even pseudoscience. It is materialist make-believe in-mind modelling minus maths. A self-contained quantum-relativistic universe/multiverse using the fewest base particles and forces (2+1). The above quark free variant is one of many possibilities. Powerful premise.... The Lattice is everything, there is no nothing, no thing is perfectly still, balanced lattice. Space is Cartesian everywhere and there is probably not (much) truly empty lattice containing no thing(s). There is no before or after The Eternal Lattice, there is no outside and The Lattice knows everything because it is everything - except a (collective) conscious entity.
LOL!
PrivateSi b
@@PrivateSi can u make some illustrations of what youre saying?
I believe that whatever space-time is, dark matter or higgs field, I think pulsars generate electromagnetic field by twisting them. If space-time is a elastic structure, we can combine all forces.
I feel healed when watching Arvin Ash's videos. Like he reads a book on physics then puts a lot of energy and creativity into making presentable images with a dialogue that is matched with great analogies but keeps the technical formulas and points out which each terms means. Theoretical physics combined with human moral problems is the heart of what our lives are all about
Another excellent video my friend. Timely too. I was reading up on QUARKS and Bosons. Your explanation helped very much. Thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
I never ever imagined that an amateur like me would get insights into this level of science in such an instructive way. This channel is so freaking awesome.
My god I LOVE THIS CHANNEL SO MUCH!!
This is a true science channel! I might have a hard time following everything but it fascinates me anyway!
Big thank you Arvin!
Glad you enjoy it!
Definitely enjoyed it even if half how of all he says goes straight over my head
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
I think this is the first time an explanation of QCD finally struck a chord with me. It was awesome - very concise yet informative and clear.
Glad it was helpful!
This is the first attempt I have even seen to explain the pull of electromagnetism. There might be others, but this is the first I've seen.
I have watched many QCD videos but Arvin simplified it in such a way that even a school student can understand it comfortably
#hatsoffsir
even though I have to repeat some parts like 10 times, I end up understanding. And that makes me feel really excited. You are one true master explaining phisics to common peope like me, please keep uploading videos, I do REALLY enjoy them (and the animations truly help my lack of imagination). Thanks a lot Arvin
I wish i could met u in person.. its lucky to have a mentor like u.. the level of deepness & clarity in ur voice adds up to your brilliant way of explaining things in layman terms
This is the best description of QCD I have ever seen
Your explanation of virtual particles is the friendliest that I’ve heard or read to date.
Love from India. Really love the content you post. Content creator like yours make UA-cam an amazing platform. Thank you so much for quality content.
Thanks. I appreciate that!
Why do people have to say "love from India" Its not like your country is special
@@tryagain_ww Country is not Special but it's just a way to let the creator know that people from India are also big fan of his content. Just to make Arvin realise his reach.
@@romishcraft He can see that from his analytics and have you ever seen people say that from other countries No because they know that he can see that from his analytics but we Indians always want to.
@@tryagain_ww If that seems cringy then I'l stop. I need more critics to finally come to a conclusion.
After watching this video, I once again realized why I subscribed to this channel already a while ago:
it’s just AWESOME!!!!
You simply know how to explain extraordinary complex theories in a very understandable manner, I love how you produce your videos, absolutely brilliant, superb narration, sound and visual editing on top level, it never gets boring, I was just mesmerized about the way you explained it all.
I have read quite a few books on the subject, mainly written for an audience (like myself), without any higher degree or so. But certain terms and explanations were very familiar to me.
Of course, I also have to point out, that even after reading all the books on this subject, it would be naive of me to say that I safely understand the subject in every aspect and detail. A great deal still remains abstract and almost incomprehensible after reading.
But in contrast, this fantastic video contributed a HUGE amount to better understand certain key elements or processes. I finally could combine what I had already read (but not fully understood well enough) with your brilliant explanations and so a few things finally made “click” in my mind!!!! I’m so grateful for ever single “mind-click”....
I’m thrilled to bits and realise, that this was a good day.... thank you so much for uploading this great video!!!!
Best wishes for you all! Stay healthy and positive!!!
Cheers,
Steven
Thank you for the kind words. I appreciate it. Glad you found it helpful.
I wish i had a physics teacher like u in my school life....really impressed by ur way of teaching. I love physics
I love your videos, they have helped me understand our universe on a completely new level. What puzzles me is that there seems to be little discussion about WHY the 'ruleset' of the fundamental particles and forces is the way it is, and thus what a quantum field could actually look like (in actual, physical terms). The key question is: What is a QF in physical terms that is actually carrying the waves/energy across space (what used to once be called Ether? 😉), and how is it that so many different ones exist layered on top of each other, while only allowing exchange of energy between them according to very precise rules (which is the most fascinating part to me). The physical properties of these fields must likely also be what govern that particles (energy) can only exist in certain quanta in certain QFs in the first place, and may even carry the fundamental explanations for the wave/particle duality of the quantum world. It appears to me as if there must be an entire layer of new physics underneath everything that we know today, and that's not even counting dark energy/matter. Anyway, amateur musings... 😛 Keep up the great videos!
Thanks so much for your generosity. Our understanding of fundamental physics is mathematical. The mathematics of quantum field theory do not indicate that it is made up of anything more basic, or at least as of now, we know of nothing deeper. It is possible that we may find that everything is made of something more fundamental like strings or something else, but no such theory exists currently. For now, QFs are not much more than properties in spacetime, which follow mathematical rules that we can predict. You may be right that there is an entire more fundamental layer of ;physics that we have no clue about. But as of now, it is an unknown unknown.
@@ArvinAsh Thanks for your response! I get what you are saying, but as with all mathematical equations that were developed in history, there's always something fundamentally physical about them. It's just that as you say, currently we have no understanding of what such properties could be and what they truly are in our physical world. But in my mind there's no question about that QF (or whatever we will still discover about them) exist because there's something real and physical there.... It will, however, be for people way smarter than me to figure that out eventually :).
@@haraldriegler6000 i recommend reading james ladyman & don ross's 'every thing must go: naturalised metaphysics'. just because we can construct questions that make grammatical sense, it doesn't mean that any question meaningfully addresses real patterns scale independently. there is no motivation from contemporary fundamental physics to suppose that there are 'individual little things' with intrinsic properties.
'physicality' is utterly mysterious. see Kane B's 2 videos about physicalism. it and naturalism are mostly used to note a refusal to posit 'supernatural' existents.
Sir I am an electronics student , but always liked to read maths and physics, I managed to read very little special relativity from resnick book, very less quantum mechanics from MIT lectures and very little particle physics from David Griffith book first two chapters two years back, As an engineer I always looked/imagined quantum technology as a future. But I only read because I am interested to know, your last two videos on 4 fundamental forces were so good, I immediately liked and subscribed to your channel😍. I am excited to see your other videos in the playlist. Thanks a lot for doing this🙏
Thanks for always being such a cordially person and for explaining such complex matter in a way that I'm always able to understand the subject you're talking about. And thanks for your effort to produce these videos. I'm convinced you're of great help not only to me.
Truly one of the best science/physics channels on UA-cam.
Like always absolutly great this insight how the exchange of virtual particles results in forces. I am an electrical engineer who worked in electro optic area but that's quite a long time ago but still I can follow up to a certain extend. And definitely during your video my neurons are in a higher energy state and afterwards I am in the released state of wondering how great our Universe works.
This is actually the best educational channel on youtube I've seen so far. Big ups.
All my life looking for answers here I got the explanation of the force that I have been spending to find the origins themselves !!!!!!
That's deep @ringocash
I dont understand what ut trying to say : (
Can I know those questions if u don't mind coz I m curious to find the answer of those questions which r not answered by anyone till now
Just discovered this channel and I am blown away by how good it is. The explanations are excellent and can be followed by anyone that takes the time to watch them. I am a retired Physics teacher and I sure wish I had access to these for my lessons on Quantum electrodynamics. My students would have loved them! Thank you for the superb content!
Thank you. Means a lot coming from a physics teacher.
Beautifully presented....
Thanks. I appreciate that.
Do you even realise how valuable this video is!! Literally nowhere else in internet I searched, people touched Actual mechanisms of forces.. They just say it happens due to particle exchange and don't say how
That was my impression as well. And that's why I wanted to make this video with the details. Thanks for watching.
Thank you again. The most obvious is gravity, yet still mysterious. Keep teaching us.
Yep, I agree it is still the most mysterious, even though it is all around us.
@@ArvinAsh How much, or does it at all, kasimir effect excluding virtual particles forming within massive objects create a pressure gradient of virtual particle pressure between mass and "empty" space?
I got. Magellan when you first did the promo campaign for it. I was so impressed with it that I Kept it well after the trial period!
I've downloaded and also kept that one way past the trial period and I'm still have and enjoy them almost daily.
Thanks for the hookup my friend!
Glad to hear that! I like it too.
Hookup?? He is paid to advertise them...
@@beri4138, yes,I know that.
@@jimbrewer498 So he didn't do you a fooking favor
Excellent video! To the best of my ability, virtually nothing said was actually incorrect, which believe me, is _very_ uncommon, and meant as high praise. I think this is probably the closest it's possible to come to fully explaining the forces of the Standard Model in pop-science terminology. I very much appreciated that you were careful to use correct terminology like pointing out that it is only *virtual* particles that moderate the forces, not real ones. That one word, "virtual" gets left out a lot, and while other physicists may "know what we mean", to a lay-person that can generate rather a lot of unnecessary confusion.
Literally the only thing I might have changed is that I wish you hadn't used the word "exist" quite so insistently with regards to virtual particles, and perhaps at least gave a nod to the notion that the particle-centric view presented here is just a useful formalism, not the underlying reality (which is all about excitations in fields). Otherwise, this was close to perfect.
If anyone reading this found this video completely understandable and thinks they are ready for the next level, I highly recommend Dr. Sean Carroll's recent series, "The Biggest Ideas in the Universe". It's quite a bit more technical than this, and uses the real underlying mathematics (in simplified form).
In any case, _excellent_ description and depiction of QCD and QED! Great work, very well presented, and with just enough care taken to include enough careful and correct terminology to perhaps entice people into following further down the rabbit hole. ;)
Thanks, I appreciate that! Regarding QFT, I have a dedicated video on that. The problem with introducing that in every "particle" video, I've found, is very confusing for most people without having watched that video first. I try to make all videos self-contained so that people do not have to view a prior video to understand the current one. But I agree, everything is fields so any talk of particles is an approximation for visualization purposes.
@@ArvinAsh You know, there's a topic I've never seen anyone cover very well in an approachable manner. I'm not sure if it's something you'd be interested in making a video on, but I would definitely be interested in watching it if you did.
The topic is the Pauli Exclusion Principle, specifically the apparent forces it generates (which in some estimation forms the majority of the 'solid-ness' of macroscopic objects, so it's not a trivial topic!)
I've seen plenty of hand-wavey mentions of it with regards to degeneracy pressure in white dwarves and neutron stars, a fair number of nods toward it in explanations of electron orbitals in physical chemistry, and a rare few mentions of its importance to the everyday world... but nobody I'm aware of has really gone in depth, in an approachable pop-science way about _where_ that pressure comes from, why it seems to create forces on even the macroscopic scale, and why we don't consider it to be "a force" with a virtual particle moderating it and so forth.
The closest I've seen anybody come is Sean Carroll in his Big Ideas Q&A on Atoms, but all he really said was, to paraphrase, "Once you get to the level of physics where you're worrying about the Pauli Exclusion Principle as a source of pressure and force, you should be well beyond needing to think of _any_ of the forces as moderated by particles; it's all fields and interactions in fields." While that's technically true, it's not a very satisfying answer. Even for someone who _does_ understand the field version of such things reasonably well, it's dissatisfying that nobody has managed to put these topics and questions into terms that give a real intuition about it.
@@barefootalien Hmm, could be interesting. I'll put that on my list. Hadn't thought of it.
So many comments have expressed what I want to say about how well you have explained these concepts so simply yet thoroughly! I echo what they have said here! Thanks for all you have done and will do! I look forward to humanity's search for the GUT and its answer with great eagerness!
Glad it was helpful!
Oh man this is brillant! Thanks thanks thanks for so much content.
Glad you enjoy it!
I'm such a layman in this topics but I love to know more about physics and especially quantum physics. You give me this knowledge in a simple understandable way. Thanks a million!
Happy to hear that!
This man is an excellent educator. He understands how to condense complex conceptual matters to convey them in simple units of information.
Thank you a lot for these videos Arvin, since secondary school it is somehow postulated that particles repel and attract due to some forces and then they go on from there with field and wave theory, all can be transmitted through vacuum (understood as nothingness) which is really really weird. Thank you for trying to heal our existential doubts by tackling the underlying mechanism of transmission of these forces.
One of the most deserved likes ive given in my life
Really intense. Wish this was on TV.
Best part was the ending "The theory of everything will not be the end" Each answer only brings more questions.
May we do kind things with this knowledge.
Don't underestimate capacitors: these inspired Maxwell to posulate the Displacement Current, and in this case we have Hendrik Casimir.
capacitors have a lot of potential
One of the best youtuber nowdays, with the most interesting topics. And I have watched a lot!
Pardon me, for calling you "UA-camr". I do know you and your content are much more than this. I just had a temporary lack of words, or maybe is not that temporary as now still struggle.
I sometimes, can't help but wonder how much we still don't know
For sure is more than what we know.
When I learn and observe more, my world becomes larger. Seems like the more I know, the more I realize that there is so much that I don't know. Sounds weird but it's true.
@@dennistucker1153 Exactly my point
consciousness is like a bubble, the larger it gets it's surface to the unknown expands.
@@EzequielBaltazar That's clever :)
10:50 so what about this quark, that is pulled back into the proton? is it „weaker/lighter“ quark(since it losts some of its energy, that is transormed into mezon)? is it still proton, if it consists of this „weaker“ quark? it should not be, right?
It's the same quark, no change in energy
@@cardboard_hat thanks for reply, only i still don´t understand, how it could be same quark, when it gave up part of itself to create mezon; this would break law of matter/energy coservation...
@@7JeTeL7 It didn't give up a part of itself
The energy from the quark getting pulled is what creates the anti quark not the quark itself
@@cardboard_hat ok, so if it lost some energy, than how could it be same quark? check my original argument two weeks ago...
"If you're with me so far..." LoL. Lewis Carroll couldn't have dreamt this stuff up.
We're all mad here. ;-)
He probably could cause he was a mathematician
Great way of explaining this :) I regularly learn more from watching a 10 min video on UA-cam then 10 years at school because at school you do not learn how things work (you only learn that it exist)...
QCD is one of those things that makes me wonder if it’s some sort of hint at some yet more fundamental property of matter and energy than we’ve yet uncovered. Fascinating and mind-bending stuff to be sure. Stay well out there everybody, and Jesus Christ be with you friends.😊
Wow Arvin! What an amazing description. Never pursued science in my higher studies, but still figured every part of your video. That explains the effort you put in to simplify the concepts of physics. Thank you with all my heart! The colour charge bit was extremely fascinating for me! Subscribing to your channel. Thanks for your beautiful service. Regards!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
Love this video. So informative. We absolutely need a quantum theory of gravity because we know gravity interacts with quantum particles, it will bend light waves for instance. But do the strong force and gravity have to be unified with the weak force and electromagnetism? Could they just be fundamentally different and not be combinable? Of course if that could be proven to be true and reasons were shown why those forces could not unite that would be a very groundbreaking theory in its own right. Lastly could the Higgs field giving mass to fundamental particles be considered a fifth force?
I think we will find a GUT - combining Strong with Electroweak a lot sooner than we will find a TOE. Gravity is just very difficult to deal with at Quantum scales. Higgs is considered a 5th "force" by many if not most scientists. I ignored it for the moment for simplification, but will have several dedicated videos on this in the future.
Hey Arvin I know you probably won’t see this but I’ve been working on this hypothesis and I’d love to hear your opinion on it. How the universe started?
Blank space with complex equations before Big Bang
Complex equations could be mathematical rules that particles have to follow, spin, charge etc.
The “Fabric of space” is just the dimension that the particles interact with
“The fabric of Space” or in quantum field theory, a field that particles oscillate in. String theory says that these oscillations are just vibrating strings, quantum field theory says this is energy.
With this in mind the only two things that are “reality” and can interact with “reality” are energy/movement/vibrations in strings/however you define the packets of energy that make up the fundamental particles.
The other is space or the field that the particles can interact with.
The field must contain information on how the particles interact with it; “complex equations” which are rules for how the particles interact with the field.
The particles/energy in the field have the values (Eg. charge spin mass) that determine how the field acts on the particles or how the particles act on the field.
With that in mind before the Big Bang the only thing that existed was space, which is just a field that gives rules on how particles act within it.
The BigBang was a massive infinitely compressed ball of energy, the energy interacted with the field and “created” particles releasing more energy.
The explosion was the rapid formations of particles producing energy. The bigbang was “energy” being added to space.
This would mean that the point beyond space, the border where the universe has not expanded to, is just a field with no energy in it (no virtual particles either)
This theory only has one field instead of the QFDs 9 fields, a particle is a packet of “energy”, different amounts of energy determine the particle. You do not need 9 fields to explain something that requires one. Here are some other non-complete thoughts/theory’s
Dark energy causes the expansion of space that particles can travel within
Dark energy may be a different kind of energy that interacts with the “energy field” (space). Although it is possible it occupies its on type of field, I believe the same could be true with Dark Matter.
Entangled particles are “stopped” in time. Like so Arvin can see
I think many points in your theory are valid. See my video called "Quantum Creation" - there are some parallels with what you are describing.
Arvin Ash alright, thanks for the response
Really really great video! I have watched a ton of these types of videos, but this one hits a sweet spot of information organization. Imo, it sidesteps the confusion of just what is a virtual particle and allows the viewer to focus on the more important basics of QCD. QCD is when most of us viewers sometimes get lost.
As for the virtual particles, imo, an important realization for a curios learner of quantum physics is this: It’s all fields. “Particles” virtual or otherwise are not tiny indivisible balls. “Particles” are modes in the fundamental fields of nature. The ground state (minimum state, nothing added) is not zero, it has a minimal mode as well. These can not be measured by themself, because you have to add more modes (need something there to measure) but the effect of the ground state modes are directly observable.
Physicists use the term “particle” to mean something different than what most learners think that word means. This is quite a challenge to the popularization of real quantum physics to a broad audience. If there was a better term available that would not immediately confuse an average viewer, then surely that would be preferable.
Yes, excellent comment on virtual particles.
You teach very passionately and inspire thought! Thank you Arvin
I was waiting for your video and here it is. Another great video Arvin! 🙏
Glad you liked it!
💓
Glad to see your channel growing.
If mesons are the particles that bind protons and neutrons then there is something pulling quarks to create mesons right?sry if this is a stupid question...
The residual color charge-to-color charge interactions between protons and neutrons creates virtual mesons that mediate the attraction between them at very close range.
These are the types of videos UA-cam needs more of.
I lost you shortly after the intro lol but I watched it all the way through hoping I will absorb some of it, thanks for the explanation.
This one packs a lot of info. I would expect most people to have to view it at least twice to understand it.
@@ArvinAsh I have multiple times lauded your ability to wield such intricate topics so adeptly and I will do it again. I think that the current physics we have are inextricably interwined with the Uncertainty principle and I think we first have to understand this principle to then transition to the rest of the content quantum theory encloses . But to profoundly understand the principle you need to first now maths ( Lorentz Transforms ) . Could you do such a video in the future?
This is just getting better and better, thanks.
The question in the title is basically the whole of physics
Fascinating stuff Arvin - great job in making complex subject a bit more accessible.
Absolutely amazing. Your explanations are brilliant. What a great video, keep it up!
I appreciate that. Glad you liked it!
Thank you for this. I've tried to read papers dedicated to weak force and strong force and it has always confused me. Especially when the colors/spins are involved with quarks. This really helped visualize how and why those two 'Forces' make things happen the way they do.
Glad it was helpful!
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
7:14
Distance = CAT
Arvin, I've always loved your graphical examples of how complex mechanisms work. Creating visual interpretations really helps us to learn the concepts better. Thanks for you & your team, and keep up the great work!
Thanks for that. We spent a lot of time on the graphics for this video. A picture is worth a thousand words, as they say,.
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
4 fundamentals forces of nature:-
There is an imposter among us
It's gravity
Finding this channel was the best thing happening in 2020.
This is just a video of me explaining D&D to new players.
XD
Great video, as always. I am a phyicisist (not doing basic reasearch for a loooong time).These videos help me to remember all the stuff I once had to learn. The key messages, at last. Amazing, thank you!
Great to hear!
my... brain... it... hurts...
Thanks Arvin
Meow.
Meow, Meow...didn't know I had feline fans. Thanks!
@@ArvinAsh lol
@Vihari Royal Yes. we are always here. Greetings to you, fellow cat person (i presume)
target is spotted.
@@ahmeth.k.2566 Not so much in the other universe.
Sir, thank you for the video. The knowledge density of this video is quite much. I have few questions:
1. Why are there specifically 2 charges in electromagnetism and three (colors) in strong nuclear force? Do they pop out of an equation?
2. How to make sense of unified forces, how to understand them?
3. Why is there the need of more than 2 bosons (z boson) for weak nuclear force?
4. Why don't neutrons decay directly to an electron and anti-neutrino? Why is the W- required to mediate?
5. What is responsible for the creation of those virtual photons, and how do they differ from real photons? Also, as the universe is filled up with virtual particles poping in and out of existence, how come virtual photons dodge them and reach the destination charge?
Thanks a lot, sir!
Enough questions for a whole course on the Standard Model! All 3 interactions are derived using pretty much the same scheme from certain symmetries. The symmetry groups for the strong, weak and EM interactions are SU(3), SU(2) and U(1). SU(3) gives you 3 color charges and 8 (3x3-1) gauge bosons, gluons, the generators of that symmetry group. SU(2) ties 2 kinds of leptons in each generation, with 3 (2x2-1) gauge bosons (2 W bosons and 1 Z), and U(1) group is about 1 particle at a time (so it doesn't change the particle type, unlike other interactions) and the positive and negative charges really come from two directions you can change the phase of a complex number which is used in all wave functions.
Unification of forces means finding a single group from which that set can be derived via symmetry breaking.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_theory
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_formulation_of_the_Standard_Model
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking
theoreticalminimum.com/courses/particle-physics-2-standard-model/2010/winter
Thanks Arvin for helping so many people understand physics. You make it enjoyable.
Thanks. I appreciate that!
This should be titled The Three Fundamental Forces + Gravity. Arvin you clearly stated that, according to Einstein, gravity is not a force and then proceeded to brilliantly explain why in your videos.
There is subtlety that I probably did not convey emphatically enough. Gravity is not a force ACCORDING TO general relativity. However, most physicists, as well as I, believe that general relativity is incomplete. A more comprehensive theory of gravity, which would include its behavior at quantum scales, probably will show that it is a force.
@@ArvinAsh Got it!! You're the BEST!
Arvin Ash you are a gift to all
You have the best science channel by FAR. Thanks very much.
I don't really comment on youtube but your videos are awesome! I've been binge watching them non-stop. Please continue to do the great work you're doing!
I've always wondered how force carriers worked even since high school in the '90s! Now it finally makes sense. Thank you!
I've been through a lot of physics videos and yours still strike me as the most informational and simple. You also have a way of staying impartial from the topic as an observer. I commend you for that!
Thanks. I appreciate that. And thanks for watching.
@@ArvinAsh sir plz tell me how gravity comes into existence after big bang ? ...Hope I will get answer soon
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
thankyou so much for your videos i am going to cambridge studying natsci next year and your videos have sustained a passion for the sciences that motivates me throughout my education
That's great! Glad to hear the videos may have given you a spark. All the best in your studies.
I had a joint and watched this and I think I understood everything.
I will rewatch it in the morning just to be sure.
One thing that BLEW me away. Physicists don't really know what + and - IS they just know it's a property that explains how particles interact
Your videos are fantastic sir. Your passion for science can be heard and it comes through so clear. You explain things simply enough for most of the general population to understand it without simplifying it so much that the truth gets muddled. Even better, you have primer videos that provide the information needed to understand your more in depth explanations.
It was educators that had your style and capability that kept me engaged in school, even if the subject was boring/dry or when I'd already finished the textbook and was waiting out the semester.
I truly enjoy learning and you make it so much easier to understand complex theories like this one.
I wish you the best and continued success with you channel!
Thanks. I appreciate that.
I have been studding the construction of the Pyramids. It blows my mind when you can see all the details of construction on the Petro cliffs. They used the "B" field of a magnet!!! what's so hard to understand?? If you take a large granite stone and vibrate the "B" field of a magnet into same, at the correct frequency, it will heat up and become soft as well. Easy to form and cut. What's the big deal it's written all over the stones IT'S ALL ABOUT THE "B" FIELD not the North and South poles. In the dark ages we got hooked on the least important part of magnetism North & South poles. We need to get our heads out of our A__. In 1958 I became a HAM operator Built and designed my own receivers and transmitters. We depend on the "B" field to transmit our AC current through the wire as well as any radio signals..FACT!!
Your explanations with the visuals are super clear. Thank you for your videos
Wow, after watching about 5 videos, this is the first one I get to understand a bit more about the color charge and forces
Bro really appreciate you. The way you explain the things is just really awesome. I have watched many videos on youTube but mostly all of them has no logic at all. Thanks and keep in going making such videos and aspiring people to know more about the amazing world. Thank You.
Thank. I appreciate that. It's my pleasure.
I have to admit, you have a very pleasant and calming voice
Hi Arvin Sir, This is The Learner's Show and I have a Doubt - Do Wormholes Really Exists, How big or small are they, can we find one of them in future or have we found, Do interstellar journey possible with Wormholes, what will be the effect of it on our body, where will it led us to ? Can You Explain Wormholes easily 👍
No wormholes have ever been detected. It comes from the math of General Relativity. They can theoretically exist, but exotic matter (negative energy or mass) is required to create them. They are probably impossible.
@@ArvinAsh Thank You for the Information Sir👍