World War 3: Every Day (Eastern Victory)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 чер 2021
- Already seen the other version and want to skip to where the timeline splits? 3:31
I went in to this project about 6 months ago not knowing what the outcome would be. Now here it is, World War 3: Every Day, inspired by the videos on the same topic made by Whatifalthist.
What Would WW3 Be Like? by Whatifalthist: • What Would WW3 Be Like...
World War 3: Every Day (Western Victory): • World War 3: Every Day...
Want to support my work and get updates on future projects?
/ vologdamapping - Розваги
![ЛЕБЕДЕВ у ДУДЯ: муху не обманешь 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E74h5fvVrqs/mqdefault.jpg)
As a swiss i need to start buying Popcorn for the next show
I don't think Swiss can escape the radioactive dust coming from the ashes of every country around you...
@Orange Fort Pootin has a message for you..
I'm will come to you and invade Switzerland.
Man if i join so i could watch the entire front
Nobody:
History channels after midnight:
For me Is 10:47
This joke is not fitting here
Lol.
@@ImperialZorn686 missing misterious powers behind the Russian offensive, some may even say, mystical?
Or aliens.
The "Nobody" meme is very pointless.
this man knows too much he knew WWIII would start by Russia invading Ukraine...
I think the biggest thing that I disagree with this simulation would be the western powers giving up on south east Asia, definitely that but maybe also France and Germany surrendering, although it is understandable, I think they would have and know they have a potential to greatly increase the western side chances of victory.
The biggest thing I disagree with is Russia actually being able to push the west. The Russian army would be small compared to Europe combined and probably be stalled out, not only that, but China would probably be focusing on the Asian front since the largest and most threatening armies like India are there.
What i disagree on is the invasion through the himalayas considering the himalayas end in narrow valleys acting as natural funnels and india have one of the largest towed artillery forces. And invasion through pakistan is possible only if china pours huge amounts of its forces and considering india will have complete air superiority for the first 6 months(chinese airbases in tibet are lacking in numbers) the attack would be much harder. Indian generals know they face a horrfying defensive war and they are preparing just for that.
@@captainmagmapyro5531 I completely disagree with you. Just because you have a larger population doesn't mean that you automatically have a larger military. Europe's total military strength (not including the US) is 1,203,468 for active personnel and reserve personnel about 1,755,000. Russia on the other hand has 1,454,000 active personnel and a total of 2,000,000 reserve personnel. And on top of that its not only russia the US has to deal with, they also have to deal with china and other chinese allies. Realistically if ww3 were to break out, I see the US mostly focusing on the Asian front since they would want to threaten the Chinese. And sure they would send some of there men to europe, however it would take months or even a year for the US to fully mobilize and send troops to europe so in the beginning of the war the russians would get the head start and probably be able to capitulate poland, baltics, and balkans before US support comes. The only way the europeans could beat russia in a war like this without US interventions is if they increase there military strength and size, and I don't see them doing that anytime soon unless the US forces europe to do so. And on top of that russia can also use chinese manpower to there advantage possibly sending some chinese troops to the European front and whatnot.
@@gotcha4649 while your logic makes sense, it actually does instantly give you manpower, they just need to mobilize.
@@NeoWish thats literally what I’m saying, but the only way they can beat Russia combined is if they mobilize large amounts of forces. Like Germany, they have enough manpower to mobilize up to a million troops and other nations as well. But I don’t see them mobilizing especially Germany since it would break the treaty and stuff like that. They can only beat russia if the US forces the European countries to mobilize large amounts of infantry to counter the Russians.
Question: Why did Russia Withdrew all of It’s occupying Troops in Denmark instead of keeping it in It’s Sphere of influence? Also how long was this war? Great video btw
*You got the Vodka Ending, the vodka, vodka ending*
Vodka = Poland.
All hail Imperium of Vodka capital Vodka national animal vodka bear national drink :- imperial vodka
Anthem:- glory to vodka drink vodka glorious vodka it saved us. Glory to vodka
Hhh
He is now vodka mapping
@@adblox shhhhh is state secret comrade!
@@sadiqahmed4143 HAIL VODKA
Both endings are very realistic. Great job Vologda Mapping. 👍
Eastern is realer, because westerns support LGBTQ+
As a swede, this makes me really want to militarize the baltic better lol
Not trying to offend you but if Russia invades Sweden you guys are fucked lol.
Europeans need these states only as meatshields confirmed.
@@devin8811 Look at ukraine lol, all words.
Lol , seems Karl Gustav is back on the bussiness
Didn't laugh
Ayo which software did you use to put the frames together?
cody?
"Yeah bro Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines and Japan would all surrender within 3 days after all of a sudden collapsing trust me bro"
That part is pretty unrealistic but still the video in general is
Why is Indonesia in the blue side?
身为一个中国人
我很负责的告诉你
菲律宾是美国的在亚洲
最大的傀儡政权
它和英法德日这种盟友不一样
傀儡国家连投降的机会都没有
美国人和日本人在太平洋溃败前
菲律宾就已经被中国完全占领了
美国没有机会
守住对菲律宾的控制权
就算菲律宾想要投降
必须满足以下条件
1 解除所有由美军扶持的武装力量
2 驻菲律宾美军宣布投降
3 拆除所有和美国有关的政府单位以及美军基地和美军的兵工厂
4 菲律宾的主权由中国解放军直接管辖，美国人不再有对菲律宾的主权
Thank you for not having a invasion into America or anything dumb like that.
Ye lol
Well, it's not that dumb, it's possible, especially with current technology
@@yamameeven967 just no
@@zavierrobertson5892 it is. Produce a massive carrier fleet and u can take the US from both Canada and Mexico. And carpet bomb the civilians with guns after establishing air superiority.
There will be an arctic war if Eastern powers try to invade US directly.
Good mapping 👍
This, as well as the other outcome, were really terrifying to watch. I don't want ww3 to happen, but it also seems like it's getting closer every day.
War is joy, war is rebirth. It's in our blood.
Well if it happens atleast dont include civilians..
There cant be peace without war
War is inevitable. Periods of peace can exist short-term, but it peace will always end.
We gotta be prepared for it, since it's most definitely going to happen, over the next few Decades.
Interesting mapping, and I must say, epic soundtrack in both videos. Greetings form Bosnia and Herzegovina ❤
Meanwhile Afghanistan: “laughs in mountain”
Yeah the Tali-Chan Taliban Ban were chilling with their Hash Opium so high
Oh nice, I like it
Why am I clenching in my seat rn
Website?
India: loses
Everyone: *And I lost all hope*
I like this this doesn’t have Europe fall like a stack of dominos to Russia, Germany and France back out after realizing they can’t win seems way more realistic
So does the peace treaty demand total non-interference or are some of these nations going to join the US in the new cold war?
But why would it happen?
What are the causes and what do the warring parties stand to gain from it?
Idk Donald Trump gets reelected?
Nice!
niceeeee
Indonesia joined eastern front.
Why did USSR delet war to Organization of Varshav pact countries?
Shouldn't Tunisia be part of the ''Western Powers''? Also nice video :)
3 weeks into the invasion of Ukraine and I'm morbidly amused at the idea of a competent Russian military.
At least this video doesn’t have russia conquer all of europe like the others
Чел, США не могло завоевать Афганистан 20 лет
@@IlyaVyatkin-wc3hvThere are hardly any countries in the world that have conquered Afghanistan, Russia failed to subdue it so badly for 9 years that it became a reason for the downfall of the Soviets, anyways 98 weeks into the war Russia is still barely competent
@@benjybrasington9508this aged well
@@benjybrasington9508 and btw us lost at red sea and vietnam let that sink in
Think this needs a big updating ( though must say interesting analysis )
Both scenarios are unrealistic, nethier ended with nuclear armageddon.
Neither Side wants that Outcome. China's looking for Centuries long Global Domination that they remember having, Hundreds of Years ago, and The United States doesn't want to kill of 325 Million American Citizens and Billions more People, worldwide.
Fun Fact : South India can't be conquered by land invasion
Hey why is that?
_🎶time to conquer all of India🎶_
...
_🎶well most of India🎶_
Malik kafur
@@mint8648 Vijayanagara Empire
@@indiafirst3676 too bad that came afterwards
Just a bit a correction here, india, Nepal and Bhutan would never be on opposing sides, as 1
India handles nepals, and bhutans defence and okther affairs
And two
The three have a centuries old relations of intermarriages and political connections
It's only 1 minute and Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Gulf region allied with Israel.
What Indonesia Are Neutral
I feel like there is 2 places that are pretty off and also hard to believe. Also I’m Japanese do it might be a bit biased. So I wouldn’t think Japan will fall that quickly especially not all islands. Although Japan and Koreas relation is not well when something happens they will need to help also the Philippines. To concurs the eastern power there is many defenses for China to attack first they will definitely need to attack Taiwan before Japan because of the Taiwanese radar which is very valuable to the Korean, Philippines, Japan, Guam, and India. They will probably need to put in so much money into it actual statistics shows that defending a place costs and need less men to defend and the attacker would need to pay 2.7x the price because Taiwan is important. It highly likely that the US side would try to defend Taiwan with the power of Okinawa Guam Phillipines and maybe South Korea. And if China gets kinda dumb and start to declare war on the US and Japan it’s gonna be a world war 3 and also it means that president Xi Jinping would be targeted and I highly think that he wouldn’t attack Japan or America because of that. Even if that happens Japan and eastern Asia’s alliances are really strong. Also don’t forget Japan has the most powerful computers number 1 for now and being the 2nd highest technological country it will be really tough also with the American on the side. Also Japan is divided by 4 main islands Being Hokkaido Honshu Shikoku and Kyushu. Also ngl Japan wouldn’t surrender for 1 island. And with many military bases and ships that can take down missiles it would take a very long time. And with island it is hard to believe that Japan will surrender.
This is a fantasy alt-history. Not a prediction of the future World War. This being a fantasy alt-history, it can be as "hard to believe" as it wants to be.
@@clutrike7956 I know just saying lol it was just like flick and one country gone
I agree, we Americans had to nuke y'all twice for surrender.
and on the topic of nukes, WW3 will not last years, or even months or weeks or days. No, it'd last just long enough for those hell bombs to fall.
Japan could be a really strong country, and as an american, I am not opposed to Japan rearming itself, it has been 75 years since WW2, times have changed, our countries are great friends now, and I quite like Japan. And yeah Japan wouldn't fall for loosing a single island, you guys are known for fighting until the very end. Also the fact that the United States has a massive military base on Japan would probably make it impossible for China to invade. Not to mention the joint Japanese/American/British navies, China wouldn't be able to compete with the combined force.
@@c.i.a.9606 exactly we aint gonna lose ecen if we are losing we will fight to the last to save us and the allies
Why would brazil help western forces lol?
Maybe it was Geographically forced just like Mongolia.
Cuz they're cool with them! 🤓🤡
Probably the only realistic version of these scenarios
Most likely China/Iran/Russia would not win this conflict. They may have more bodies to throw at the problem, but the allied powers have far better coordination and technology. Lets not even talk about the U.S. navy. Live in America or not, you cannot deny the U.S. navy would decimate anything in the water, the ocean would be the allied powers big bathtub. Europe has a lot better tech than the Russians, and geography would be on their side, yeah Russia would probably push pretty deep, but they probably wouldn't even get past Poland before their advance is halted. The middle eastern front would be over quicker than you could imagine. We saw what happened during the Iraq war. Asia would be swaying in favor of the Allies within a year tops. The combined UK/Japanese/United States navy would make any naval invasion impossible. India would get hit hard by the Chinese and Pakistani's, but would probably halt their advance after a year or two of conflict. Russia and China would have a strategy similar to the Germans in both world wars, momentum. Knock Europe and India out of the war fast making the war impossible for the allies to win. Which wouldn't happen more than likely. Is it possible for the "Centeral Eurasian Powers" to win? Of course, but being a realist, it is HIGHLY unlikely.
@@c.i.a.9606 tech isn't everything.
The Soviets had bad tech back in the 1940s but they still won with sheer manpower, and the power of winter.
True
@@c.i.a.9606 I think most people underestimate the industrial capabilities of China, if fully mobilized they can be more powerful than the US, the sheer population of China makes all the difference when mobilized, the Chinese are also very famous for being very fast at building so their factories would grow exponentially when war breaks.
After 30 years, it will be like that.
Beautiful
Very realistic, I love it 👍
I doubt thst Nepal is going to be on China's side in case of a global conflict (in my opinion) and Thailand is definitely not going to be on China's side cuz Myannmar, Laos, Cambodia and China itself exists but great video
israel stayed blue after the surrender uwu
what the sus?
🎉
Bruh
Okay I need to see actual borders of the countries at the end!!
Realistically Indonesia would've joined the east
The only reason they didn’t is because the United States controls the oceans and could easily Bomb them to oblivion
indonesian here, yeah considering the spratly islands and how the government has banned chinese citizens, yeah high chance indonesia will be neutral or a westener.
Hey, gringo. Do you mind if I voice this video on my channel? It's just, it would be better to ask your permission, so here.
Sure, just mention that it’s made by me.
@@VologdaMapping No problem, thanks.
I declare this canon
Though in this out come it’s not really a win for the east in Europe. Russia would not be able to hold on the those European areas for more then 40-50 years
this is more realistic than western victory, respects from me
good joke
Good sincere statement.
@@isaacharton7851 Americans butthurt in replies as usual
Assuming the east has just the countries in this video this is unrealistic. They are pretty much going against the ENTIRE DEVELOPED WORLD. I could see initial gains until the west is properly mobilized and then they don’t have a chance
@@onyxrafle8066 If east gains quickly east wins, if west mobilize within the first year, west wins, westerners are very anti war and their democracy would backfire because people would be very quick to end the war, autocracies don't have this bug and could go as long as they like, and people support of war is considerably higher than western counties.
If I was china I would just wait it out till America collapse at his own weight, 10 years from now a war would be much more in favor of east than west, west either has to choose between being democratic, which immediately pulls out as people riot and don't want war at their soil, or loses its democratic values and force people into mobilization, I WW3 war ever going to break out it isn't over Ukraine, but its a start of it, highly unlikely though, nobody want's war.
It’s good, but the sides aren’t realistic, if you put South Africa on the red because of BRICS, they aren’t a military/political alliance. I recommend you research relations a bit more, but besides that, great vid.
Well done👍
But i don't think that even all "eastern Powers" together would have a good chance against USA allone. Not talking about it's allies in europe.
Their Budget is too big and they are too good equipped.
Pure bs
@@tatarkhan33 and why?
A lot of estimates recently have placed chinas military might as equal to the US. Now of course the US military has much greater ability in terms of it being vastly older and wiser with greater leadership and administration that comes with that, but if all the countries that would join the eastern bloc do, they would greatly over power the US if it was alone. Although actually taking over and occupying the US is another story because of its geography.
@@stilicho8762 you have to know that China has 2M active troops and Russia 1M while the us has 1M as well, who do you think would even win?
3M vs 1M?
@@mapeditorjon5306 what if its 3M badly trained troops vs 1M very well trained troops
Time to fight!
For the east I will correct:Indonesia and Egypt
Element 44
Unrealistic, but nonetheless very interesting.
Just saying, South Africa in both versions literally loses main territory lol.
Actually, Italians weren't the first who gave up in this war.
Isnt Russia so close to Alaska why couldnt they do an invation there?
Would be suicide, American defenses would basically bombard the Russians under the ice
Paratroopers maybe would work but they can't really get supplies efficiently
Invading Alaska would have like no purpose and it would be a minor distraction
If Eastern powers invade Alaska, US will use its 100% power to fight the Eastern powers. In this video US may just uses half of its power...
@@jilongxie6561 reeeeeeeeeeeee no the USA lost like Russia I’m ukraime Russia totally just dosnt use 10% of its power reeeeeeee
i feel like some countries would just switch up during the war
比如以下国家
法国、德国、日本、意大利
Cool video but I think South African would be on the uk Side
My favourite country United States lost of the ww3.
I wonder what city would be the Stalingrad of ww3
Kiev or Stalingrand (yes again) propably.
@@stephmod7434Kyiv
@@WhyGamingYT Kiev*
Bakhmut
What makes you think that there would be a Stalingrad? ww2 was different from ww1 so ww3 would be different from ww2.
Plus western nations and Russia as they are getting older can't have so many fighting age people anymore to have such a large battle, ww3 would be smaller in scale compared to ww2 if it does not go nuclear
Why does Panama fight Panama are neutural
Panama doesn't have an army and USA protects it.
Totally unrealistic scenario
Literally every WW3 simulation : West wins
This one : is the best simulation because it's realistic and original
Most are either bias towards the west, or don't know the current landscape of the world lol.
lol not remotely realistic. The US has an overwhelming advantage over the military of every other country. Also, you know, nukes.
@@joshkarpatkin2642 but russia and china also have nukes tho..
@@auchee yeah obviously. I was talking about conventional military, although even in a nuclear war it holds true. Its a horrible scenario to think about, but in the actual event of an all out nuclear war, the US would still come out on top. The US has more warheads, better delivery systems, better intelligence, technology, missile defense, etc. Obviously 50 million people dying wouldnt be a "win" but the US government/military would come out in better shape than the russian/chinese military. You can't win a nuclear war but the US would lose less badly than Russia/China lol
@@joshkarpatkin2642 Infact Russia got more warheads althrough if we scale by team its probably western power
Nice to see a more interesting scenario where the "good guys" don't always win. Goob job.
@@ernsternarnst847 It’s hard to say either side is good or bad. But this doesn’t seem like a good guy win in my opinion
@@ernsternarnst847 Democracy vs Dictatorship chose your side.
@@ernsternarnst847 Hahahahahahah China is a one party state.
@@ernsternarnst847 No shit Sherlock Still a one party state.
@@ernsternarnst847 Technically speaking North Korea isn't a one party state but you're not gonna call it a democracy
I predict that India will come back against an Eastern Invasion, in a relatively extremely similar Way to how The Soviets pushed back against The Third Reich, in The Eastern Front, in the Event of Indian Invasions of Pakistan's Major Cities and Tibet failing. With the sheer Manpower of India, it would be unlikely as Hell, from the Onset of the War, of Chinese Troops ever making it to Tamil Nadu, especially with Allied Reinforcements from Indonesia, Thailand, and Australia. However, that Supply Chain probably would be at near constant Risk, with China's East African Bloc being able to impede it.
That assuming they join the western side, which I wouldn't count on in light of recent developments.
They have bad equipment from Russia. And their population is too poor. China also has more manpower than India
India would never take a western or eastern side
@@inkofficial3571 Modi go brrrrrrr.
Realer, than western ending
0:57 You got that one right (except the Baltic States... yet). We'll see how the geopolitical future unfolds. In the meantime, peace and love to all good people on Earth.
Why is Indonesia working with US even they love Russia more
That is gonna happen in 2025 or 2026
Lol Russia is shit XD only nuclear weapons may be useful
My Prediction This Gonna Be Happen In 2030 or 2035
if russia can't beat ukraine it can't beat all of nato
No, it will happen in 2045, when the Eastern technologies(basically China and Russia) surpass the Western technologies.
Did anyone notice Israel is still in the blue side after the war?
BRUH
We will victory for
Glory to the east 🇷🇺✌🏻
URAA🇷🇺
Glory to the east!
@@PrivateMcPrivate
УРА🇷🇺
Z
Z
And why is Brazil against the east, if it is part of the BRICS?
Brics is not a military alliance, Brazil, South Africa and India could leave the western side without any problem.
Brazil would atleast try to be neutral in the war. It literally doesn't win anything joining either side.
Persia power
Ww3
Indonesia: lol i neutral
Not funny.
why dose south Africa join eastern powers???
Because.
@@lepepe because whhyyy
BRICS?
@@profmembrane1720 BRICS isn't a military alliance
@@profmembrane1720 Brazil and India are also part of BRICS, doesn't mean they're China's allies
Alternative title: Chinese ending
BOSNIA ALIVE
Semoga ga ada perang dunia selanjutnya, bahaya cuy..
By far the most realistic scenario
True
@@yamameeven967 you say this is the most realistic scenario even after seeing Russia getting whooped by ukraine
Most unrealistic Russia can’t even take 20% of ukraine
@@fallencobra5197вы говорите что победа запада возможна, даже после его поражения в Афганистане
Eastern world I think would ez clap usa and it’s allied
Brazil and Argentina wouldn’t join in the war at all my bro, worst case scenario for these 2 is civil war due to rebellion against the socialist governments.
India vs brick vs nato vs csto vs rest of world
The good ending
@Matthewishere cringe
@Matthewishere says the westerner
Anglosaxons vs russians
It takes South Korea!
韩国？开战不用几天就消失了😂
how the f egypt just joined israel 😂
Fun fact, Egypt was the first Arab country to recognize Israel
Btw I loved this video and if you want to know who would win in ww3 well its the west, now I know that the east has a better military but if you think about it the west have the advantage of being everywhere in all continents while most of the east of the east is in Asia and so that means that the west has the east encircled and don't forget that America and protected by oceans and the Russians won't even try to invade through Alaska as they know that the US will retaliate and take it back also the Russians have no interest in the Americas they are only focused in Europe and they occupying Alaska will be useless as they need to use their army in Europe where the most important part is, yeah so basically the west controls the oceans and are spread out everywhere also they Have way more allies than the east but that doesn't mean I am right because the east still have a high chance of winning its just that the west is more likely to win than the east
How does the East have the better military?
You don't seem to understand much about this landscape. It's one of the West's problems, that they are too spread out. Unlike the East they are all bulked up in one place while America has its shit everywhere thinned out. Being "encircled" means nothing when it doesn't provide any benefit. If you're talking about supply everyone in connected to China.. I don't particularly understand why you think that way. But I'm not insulting you, I don't do that.
As long as Eastern powers gain the most of controls in Eurasia, they win.
Let’s gooooo
Japan is My favourite country surrendered.
Didnt that happen in real life?
@@hellgates_javed6451 No real life, but only Russian invaded into Ukraine.
Japan didn't surrender in this video.
@@jilongxie6561
投降和停战不都是失败了吗？
当日本人在朝鲜半岛
被中国人击败时
日本就选择停止战争了😂
My boy, good video, but it seems to have attracted a lot of commies in here. We’re gonna have to do something about that
Indeed it has attracted commies here
You know what? Lets nuke em.
ok liberal
The Realistic Ending
The spirit of liberty and the vibrant cultures will never wither. All dictators shall fall, we must not accept their inhuman and violent ways.
@@HeortirtheWoodwarden Fun Fact: Easterners Actually like dictators because in the east dictators are viewed as role models and smart and strong people.
Also the countries under these "dictatorships" are pretty free anyway as long as you don't piss off the government.
Source:
I'm an easterner.
@@PrivateMcPrivate The problem is that there's no system to guarantee that the dictator is actually a good leader, especially in hereditary positions like in North Korea. They may need to be smart and strong to go up the ranks of the party, but that doesn't mean they will actually do good to the people. Their only goal is usually maintaining the power of their party. The only authoritarian regime that's actually prosperous is the tiny Singapore city-state, so you can see how well the system usually goes. What does it take to piss off the government though? Just say you don't like them? Consume media that goes against their message? Protest for better healthcare or wages? Now a personal question. Have you ever not done something you really wanted to because it would piss off the government? And what country are you from anyway?
@@HeortirtheWoodwarden the end of history
@@HeortirtheWoodwarden What about the leaders of EU countries? When the people complain about sanctioning Russia makes them tired, the governments of those EU countries don't listen to the people and still keep sanctioning Russia? Aren't leaders of EU's countries dictators?
Such a depressing fate for the world. People with centuries of history living free under democracies would have to live under ruthless dictatorship. I just hope they could preserve their cultures under the shadows, in hopes of one day retaking their way of life.
Democracy does not exist.
@@makutas-v261 You do not exist
@@HeortirtheWoodwarden Why is nobody from west imposes israeli?, the country who keep barking they are democracy while they were Neo nazi who genocide palestinian lol? Funny word, yet democracy is not exist
@@afdalridwan3813 I think Israel was a bad idea
@@HeortirtheWoodwarden ye
Why india is so underated
Why would russia on first place attack them
I think you are a swedish mohommad
That's China attacking India, not Russia.
Russias dream
Bhutan joined Switzerland club... 🤔
bruh the western powers gave up after losing one battle lmao
I think the woke peoples did mega riots lol
These are not just one battle, Western power have lost from India to Middle East to Eastern Europe. So the Western powers have to give up and retreat.
Watching this now as Russia struggles to fight Ukraine for almost half a year now
Because west helping Ukraine and also russian weak force invade Ukraine strong force are in border side of nato
@@STRACT_STRIKE Well no shit buddy. If you are gonna bully another country, expect the west helping it.
@@dorito_crusador5858 right but saying that russia is weak country is not real
@@STRACT_STRIKE Russia's lack of money may be the major problems, otherwise Russia just needed to launch 10000 hypersonic missiles and 100000 conventional missiles to Ukraine and Ukraine will probably surrender.
India would join the eastern side i think
Damn I'd have to be on the eastern powers 😔
The Bad Ending
@@ernsternarnst847 yes
They're both bad endings, lmao.
@@ernsternarnst847
Centrism? I just want the next Asteroid to strike already...
@@ernsternarnst847
People who repeatedly say "cringe" are always the cringiest of all.
@@ernsternarnst847
👌