I love seeing azorius familiars! murmuring mystic was the combo piece that was still playable that fams needed. why not use generous gift? it is legal for pauper
@@Moskalus I think that matchup is very hard for fams tbh. Your side is best playing a bunch of pyros and working to resolve a monarch then riding that to victory
i think wizards is pumping out too much content over the past 2 years! you need to keep buying to keep up, mostly in commander! This is why pauper is my fav format, prob only format soon
Dear god even I am tilted about the luck of newbarola... if this happens to me in paper I would probably ragequit to my home from my LGS XD. Nice challenge though men
You only lost to newbarola having two All That Glitters on Ornithopters. Unfortunate that he had the nuts both times. Great games, though! Good job on the Top 8
6-2 isnt bad of course, but i don't want to be lead by results: you found 2x Deep anal + 1x brainstorm was Better than meeting of minds? It's True that the list Is running very few creatures, and i like Deep analysis a lot, but i'm asking anyway since i'm now running a list less mystic-based (-1 mystic -3 ponder -1 brainstorm -2 Deep anal +3 Sea Gate Oracle +4 meeting) but i was thinking about cutting an Oracle for a single Deep anal. MoM seems Just Better with some more Blue creatures.
I really love to play meeting of minds but I think you just lose hard vs control and I hate that. I wanted to condense the card draw into fewer slots here
Love familiars! Love the gameplay! Love the video! Thanks and congrats for the top 8 :))
Congrats on making the cut!
Thanks!
Nice seeing you play a challenge!
Yeah especially if I did well haha
Definitely adding the podcast to the list! Cheers!
Awesome I hope you enjoy. Feedback is welcome
Congrats! Fams is becoming my fav :)
That's awesome!!!
Congrats!
Thanks!
nice dude! Congrats!
Thanks!
gz!
Thanks a lot!
I love seeing azorius familiars! murmuring mystic was the combo piece that was still playable that fams needed.
why not use generous gift? it is legal for pauper
I have tried it a few times and it is just too much Mana tbh
I just cannot beat this deck at my LGS!
what do you usually play? it eats midrange for sure
Running Izzet Terror now, no chance lol@@kalikaiz
@@Moskalus I think that matchup is very hard for fams tbh. Your side is best playing a bunch of pyros and working to resolve a monarch then riding that to victory
I play caw-gates and beat fams easily in my lgs
@@kalikaizwhats the inside scoop for beating it as U/B faeries? I feel like Fams is a big struggle.
i think wizards is pumping out too much content over the past 2 years! you need to keep buying to keep up, mostly in commander!
This is why pauper is my fav format, prob only format soon
Yeah way too much nonsense getting pushed
GGs again, although I played bad and you killed my top8 hopes :)
GGs thanks for giving me a chance at top 8 haha
Dear god even I am tilted about the luck of newbarola... if this happens to me in paper I would probably ragequit to my home from my LGS XD. Nice challenge though men
Thanks! Yeah it was pretty brutal but apparently that kind of thing is fine 🙃
To be honest, all that glitters isn’t the problem, will never be the real problem. The lands tho… these are stupid.
You're definitely correct
You only lost to newbarola having two All That Glitters on Ornithopters. Unfortunate that he had the nuts both times. Great games, though! Good job on the Top 8
Thanks a lot! Yeah he just crushed me like a bug
6-2 isnt bad of course, but i don't want to be lead by results: you found 2x Deep anal + 1x brainstorm was Better than meeting of minds? It's True that the list Is running very few creatures, and i like Deep analysis a lot, but i'm asking anyway since i'm now running a list less mystic-based (-1 mystic -3 ponder -1 brainstorm -2 Deep anal +3 Sea Gate Oracle +4 meeting) but i was thinking about cutting an Oracle for a single Deep anal. MoM seems Just Better with some more Blue creatures.
I really love to play meeting of minds but I think you just lose hard vs control and I hate that. I wanted to condense the card draw into fewer slots here
First😅
Thanks for coming!
i came here to comment on the first comment
@@horvathsogranfume658 thanks for the comments, I will comment my appreciation!