random guy, not too much since math and most known science was already discovered by then. Kinda like if we went to the moon in 1969 why aren’t we even close to getting there now or mars or other planets.
Because it was a race for glory, not as much scientific progress. And it's wrong and false to say we aren't close to going back yet, within 3-5 years America will be back on the moon, along with private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin.
@@xtremerace is that rhetorical? The plans for the Titan rockets *disappeared* the scientists who worked on them are gone, but the other reasons are more financial and mostly political. Theres been no political stomach for it. Ffs, infrastructure cant even get done!! So how do you think a $billion/trillion program with the Shuttle track record get passed? The $ being spent on black projects and classified "security" the money is there, but none will attach their names to reducing "national security" budgets. Imagine the ads! SMDH
Well, it would be a lot less embarrassing than burning trillions to overhaul your aerial (aim for the stars, land in the bushes) and naval (just, why?) might for a war that would hypothetically be fought using drones, artificial intelligence viruses, and missiles.
I've done some restricted CNC work for a few of those projects and some of the parts/descriptions seem to not make sense. Some weird physics voodoo stuff.
@@nova1726 it's a joke man, I know the blackbird wasnt a bomber. The thing is by far one of my favorite planes. From the titanium plating to the J58 Turboramjet engine, its awesome.
The first armed version of the US ICBM, the Atlas D, was declared operational in January 1959 at Vandenberg, although it had not yet flown. The first test flight was carried out on 9 July 1959,[7][8] and the missile was accepted for service on 1 September. Its not like they only had bombers before this.
@@alexkruse7624 We probably could if we wanted to, its just not worth the risk/loss and would be kind of evil and really sad with all the death and then we would lose all our boogeymen used to scare the american people.
Russia is trying to develop this type of weapon now. Russia has tried five test launches and each ending in catastrophic failure with the missile exploding shortly after launch.
@HellYeaNixon yet they still outperform anything that the US can produce. Lets be honest with ourselves here, the US without a doubt has a better conventional army (planes, tanks, etc.) than Russia due to its absurd budget, however Russia far outperforms the US when it comes to things like long range, nuclear and rocket based warfare therefore making it the winner in a hypothetical nuclear war.
@@ApocalipsizProductions I would have to strongly disagree... The USA doesn't tell everyone what we are capable of, unlike other countries that demonstrates their power to seem superior. I would go as far to say, not even our strongest allies know the full scale of America's nuclear arsenal power. Think about the great secret SR-71.... who's to say or know we dont have something that is the next leading edge to future warfare.... Just because we don't show it, doesn't mean we don't have it
Invictus Heh you get used to it after a while. Halve every pound they say for kilos. 3.3 feet is about a meter. Miles are 1,5 longer than kilometers. 4 inches are about 10 cm. A gallon is little less than 4 liters. That's about it. I don't really get the cups thing but I don't watch cooking shows on YT. It's BS I know but very few US channels actually bother to conform to the world outside the states.
Why don't they replace the reactor with a bunch of enraged Karen's? It will be a lot hotter. Edit: thx for the likes everyone, it isn't everyday I get this much support.
CreeperDude0509 They don't even need to include a warhead. When Karen lands, she'll explode on her own. Edit: Top 2 comments by Creeper and CreeperDude0509 ... ok ... creepy.
Interesting side note: the ceramic fuel rods for the TORY-II nuclear ramjet engine came from Coors Porcelain Company, which is owned by the same family as the Coors Brewing Company, who were instrumental in the invention of the aluminum beverage can - and, of course, also how to put beer into one.
This was one of the projects my grandfather worked on. It's rather telling that of all the weapons he helped to develop, THIS was the one that scared him.
rubikfan1 Dude ramjets require an ATMOSPHERE to function. Otherwise and a radioactive sphere emitting power is already being used for space exploration.
@@ExHyperion but you can use the heat of an nucleair engine to heat hydrogen and shoot it out the back. No need for an oxidizer. And ofcourse the nucleair hall thruster. So that ion engines work beyond the orbit od jupitair(to little sun)
many parts of project pluto still classified, like those small nuclear reactors, in space a legit nuclear reactor lets you have alot of potential delta v
On a real note, The use of SLAM rockets would be extremely detrimental to both sides of conflict. I can't believe in any capacity it would do anything then heighten the stakes of a nuclear conflict. Thanks for sharing another fear I never knew I had. 😂
My dad remembers being buzzed by a B52 in the early 1960s as a boy. He grew up on a farm about an hour east of Omaha. He says all he remembers is a window blew out as it flew so low, and he ran to his dad yelling "da bombah! da bombah!" - interesting time to be alive!
@@fullcircle8231 yep. Late in the 1980s, the Soviets sent unmanned modules to take pictures of venus which were transmitted from venus back to earth. The cameras only lasted a little bit because of the atmosphere in venus, but pictures were taken and received. You can look them up too if you don't believe me
humanity in a nutshell. no species on earth is really capable of causing human extinction, and a natural disaster capable of that is probably pretty rare
1st paragraph of Wiki contradicts this entire video "The development of ICBMs in the 1950s rendered the concept of SLAMs obsolete. Advances in defensive ground radar also made the stratagem of low-altitude evasion ineffective. Although it never proceeded beyond the initial design and testing phase before being declared obsolete, the design contained several radical innovations as a nuclear delivery system. "
@@ragnarok9287 Not everything on Wikipedia is reliable, neither is UA-cam. Or anywhere else on the internet. However it would explain why these missiles aren't talked about more often.
I thought I was experiencing deja vu, but no... 3:59 "This is where Project Pluto stepped in and saw the potential in using ramjet engines to completely replace SAC's nuclear fleet with a fleet of unmanned nuclear missiles." 4:58 "This is where Project Pluto stepped in and saw the potential in using ramjet engines to completely replace SAC's nuclear fleet with a fleet of unmanned nuclear missiles." Editing whoopsie. :P I worry that you guys are churning out videos too quickly, and quality is suffering as a result.
Imagine what kind of weapons we have now, if this was over 40 years ago. Particle beams, railguns, weather manipulation and much more. This thing must be child's play compared to what is out there now.
Rail guns exist weather manipulation is not reasonable due to the amount of energy needed and particle beams do sort of exist, but they are not that useful in comparison to other more traditional weapons. (I will remind you that guns shoot a hunk of metal faster then the speed of sound using some powder)
@@RC-bi7cp Most people do not care and brake it anyway. But you are right there is actually a law .For example you can't use deadly gas as a weapon anymore. But what are people going to do when the enemy uses gas anyway? Call the police?
What you used for the thumbnail was a prototype project named “Pluto” which could (in theory) fly for an unknown amount of time, dropping nuclear bombs on several targets. Upon running out of fuel it would fly low to the ground to expose as much land to radiation before crashing. Edit: I started and finished writing this less than halfway through the video.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
As informative as this video is, one simple Google search was enough to find that the person who invented them said that the idea of the reactor as a secondary weapon is not feasible.
Why not? Maybe they just dont want a repeat of that time a boy scout made a nuclear reactor in his shed. Dont ever think you have all the governments information.
Mind controlling radio waves, Plasma forcefields and UFO weapons that disable ships and planes, Mind controlling food and internet, Population controlling internet and infrastructure, I mean don't even try to ask or find the truth, unless you want thousands of bad stuffs inside your head and go crazy tbh.
One thing for sure yet is that humanity haven't made a proper super human without some side effect on them things, And they aren't closed enough for infinite energy generation yet.
The first reliabble cruise missle in the US was the Snark Anti Aircraft Missle and had a speed of Mach2.5 only guidance systems and power plant designations have changed!
My elementary school outside DC had air raid sirens at the time in the 80s before the fall of The Wall, tested every Saturday morning if I remember right
Ww3 starts:
Everybody: *Come on and SLAM and welcome to the JAM*
...cringe.
Shame is alot ppl are looking at this like huh?? Lol
*Come on and [REDACTED*
XD
@@someguy1688 grow a childhood, mate
If they were able to accomplish this back then, imagine what the're hiding from the public NOW ......
random guy, not too much since math and most known science was already discovered by then. Kinda like if we went to the moon in 1969 why aren’t we even close to getting there now or mars or other planets.
Because it was a race for glory, not as much scientific progress. And it's wrong and false to say we aren't close to going back yet, within 3-5 years America will be back on the moon, along with private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin.
@@xtremerace is that rhetorical? The plans for the Titan rockets *disappeared* the scientists who worked on them are gone, but the other reasons are more financial and mostly political. Theres been no political stomach for it. Ffs, infrastructure cant even get done!! So how do you think a $billion/trillion program with the Shuttle track record get passed? The $ being spent on black projects and classified "security" the money is there, but none will attach their names to reducing "national security" budgets. Imagine the ads! SMDH
Well, it would be a lot less embarrassing than burning trillions to overhaul your aerial (aim for the stars, land in the bushes) and naval (just, why?) might for a war that would hypothetically be fought using drones, artificial intelligence viruses, and missiles.
I've done some restricted CNC work for a few of those projects and some of the parts/descriptions seem to not make sense. Some weird physics voodoo stuff.
"The bomber would fall apart from the speed"
Sr71: *laughs in mach 3 cruising speed*
pixelpoepleman the SR-71 is a spy plane not a bomber, and the design was made for speed
@@nova1726 it's a joke man, I know the blackbird wasnt a bomber. The thing is by far one of my favorite planes. From the titanium plating to the J58 Turboramjet engine, its awesome.
@Mike Watson "cruising"
@@nova1726 They had variants that could carry an offensive payload.
MIG-35 has entered the match
Nah fam you're all wrong, it was just a massive creeper with rocket boots from area 51
Aww man
Elytra and fireworks*
@@joshMorgan111 yes!!!!!!!
@@joshMorgan111 se we back in the mine
I am the 100th person to like
Did you animated Norway, Finland and Sweden into the soviet union? Stalin would be proud
Ultimate Gandhi wrong that’s the northern coast on a funny angle
Large island is novaya zelmya
But I see the similarity
@@ollie2sik your mother is the northern coast
Creeper
@HR - 11FS - Brampton Centennial SS (2502) nah it was gold
Felix Kjelberg aww man
*”Oh, it’s beautiful.”* - Director Krennic Star Wars: Rogue One
didnt know there were iphones and selfie sticks during the cold war
Ahead of the curve.
I am in finland right now ☢
You caught it too, I was like dafuq?
Or interracial dating
Guess you missed the part were time travel, mind control and teleportation were tested and successful to a limited degree during the cold war. :)
This video must have been a blast to produce. A real shockwave of information. Ground zero of knowledge. My face is just radiating with joy.
...the penalty is death
Arsenal of puns. Ready for disposal.
@@isoSw1fty leave
So funny so humourous
I dying laughing
I dead now
- Uncle Roger
@@Crabbob365 he was here firstw
Sounds like a near perfect weapon in the terms of destructive capabilities
yep :)
Everything is capable of all kind of destructive weapon, just depend on your imagination and intelligence to shape it.
Why is Finland Norway and Sweden shown to be Russian?
No actually I dont think they did. Maybe a different timestamp?
It will be
@@ekstrajohn Sweden and Norway have never bin part of Russia
@@fe1ixj591 they will. russia will save you from the elites
Mandela effect? Finland Norway and Sweden were always Russian.
The first armed version of the US ICBM, the Atlas D, was declared operational in January 1959 at Vandenberg, although it had not yet flown. The first test flight was carried out on 9 July 1959,[7][8] and the missile was accepted for service on 1 September.
Its not like they only had bombers before this.
Did you just include Norway, Sweden and Finland in the Soviet union?
Did he?
When
At 0:48
Infographics show is pretty dumb. They thought America could beat the entire world at once
@@alexkruse7624 We probably could if we wanted to, its just not worth the risk/loss and would be kind of evil and really sad with all the death and then we would lose all our boogeymen used to scare the american people.
Russia is trying to develop this type of weapon now. Russia has tried five test launches and each ending in catastrophic failure with the missile exploding shortly after launch.
Teddyballgame because...they...are lonely...I guess?
And ?
Please give your source please.
@HellYeaNixon yet they still outperform anything that the US can produce. Lets be honest with ourselves here, the US without a doubt has a better conventional army (planes, tanks, etc.) than Russia due to its absurd budget, however Russia far outperforms the US when it comes to things like long range, nuclear and rocket based warfare therefore making it the winner in a hypothetical nuclear war.
@@ApocalipsizProductions I would have to strongly disagree...
The USA doesn't tell everyone what we are capable of, unlike other countries that demonstrates their power to seem superior.
I would go as far to say, not even our strongest allies know the full scale of America's nuclear arsenal power.
Think about the great secret SR-71.... who's to say or know we dont have something that is the next leading edge to future warfare....
Just because we don't show it, doesn't mean we don't have it
Please add metric units (perhaps as as a subtitle) for your viewers outside of the states :)
Theres a place outside the states? Pog
@don yes, the UK, the very people who made the us.
Indian fam,unite!!!
Invictus Heh you get used to it after a while. Halve every pound they say for kilos. 3.3 feet is about a meter. Miles are 1,5 longer than kilometers. 4 inches are about 10 cm. A gallon is little less than 4 liters. That's about it. I don't really get the cups thing but I don't watch cooking shows on YT. It's BS I know but very few US channels actually bother to conform to the world outside the states.
@@SomeNot The very people rotting in graves?
Why don't they replace the reactor with a bunch of enraged Karen's? It will be a lot hotter.
Edit: thx for the likes everyone, it isn't everyday I get this much support.
CreeperDude0509 from the office?
@@ysaysaysaysa more like from entitled parent stories
Edit: think the Karen persona
Nah man.. they just gotta throw me in there.. once I turn into ultra instinct form my body heat will be enough.
CreeperDude0509 They don't even need to include a warhead. When Karen lands, she'll explode on her own.
Edit: Top 2 comments by Creeper and CreeperDude0509 ... ok ... creepy.
U forgot the kyles though just give them 1 monster energy energy and their body heat reaches heat levels in excess of 99000 degrees Celsius
Interesting side note: the ceramic fuel rods for the TORY-II nuclear ramjet engine came from Coors Porcelain Company, which is owned by the same family as the Coors Brewing Company, who were instrumental in the invention of the aluminum beverage can - and, of course, also how to put beer into one.
Really disappointing you didn’t use apollo creed/ rocky vs Ivan drago for the boxing thing at 0:41
That's what I was thinking about the whole time hahahahahaha.
@@maddoxdavidson9963 is that sended from a doomguy
8:05
Ah yes, the B-17, the most modern of nuclear bombers.
Lol they never went nuclear the b29s did.
@@Archie_primus it was a joke
@@graphited2419 Ik
When your early and you want to say something but you have no ideas so you write this instead
Nice profile pic
Cyrus Zheng you too
That's a grand slam.
@@TheMCexpert63 nice
@@Poopydoopysxoopy nice
So.... I have not been informed about this until now. Thank you for making this so quickly.
6:40 D E M O N I T I Z E D
lol
Love Your Informing Videos Keep It Up!!
I would bet a year’s pay that the USA did build them but kept it under extreme wraps
Make it 100 years pay instead
Still can't believe they built a missile that could fly for months
I'll take that bet. These things are built to deter. You can't really deter if no one knows about it
love your videos they always teach me something new everyday :D
This was one of the projects my grandfather worked on. It's rather telling that of all the weapons he helped to develop, THIS was the one that scared him.
R.I.P to grandpa he doesn't have to witness dooms day.
Mine worked at the los Alamos national laboratory, same place where the hydrogen bomb was made
0:48 wy is Norway,Sweden and Finland part of the soviet union?
It will be soon
communistHD because they were concerned due to the speed of communism through 1917-1991 also they were allied
@@SuperPellis hmm I like the sound of that
@@playboy6732 Sweden was neutral
Fe1ixJ then they were influenced by communism
Extra info, Russia nuke powered middles have blown up recently in the arctic circle
Source?
A W SSC-X-9 Skyfall. Search on Wikipedia.
Great video!
Cant we use that power for space exploration?
rubikfan1 Dude ramjets require an ATMOSPHERE to function. Otherwise and a radioactive sphere emitting power is already being used for space exploration.
@@ExHyperion but you can use the heat of an nucleair engine to heat hydrogen and shoot it out the back. No need for an oxidizer.
And ofcourse the nucleair hall thruster. So that ion engines work beyond the orbit od jupitair(to little sun)
many parts of project pluto still classified, like those small nuclear reactors, in space a legit nuclear reactor lets you have alot of potential delta v
Your thinking is right....
Unfortunately fight is embedded into our genome😢
Idiots oxidizers only suppements oxygen for the fire but for the compression itself you need a atmosphere.
Congrats on having the only UA-cam channel left that's worth watching.
On a real note,
The use of SLAM rockets would be extremely detrimental to both sides of conflict. I can't believe in any capacity it would do anything then heighten the stakes of a nuclear conflict. Thanks for sharing another fear I never knew I had. 😂
Terrifyingly awesome!
Video idea
“What would happen if you had friends”
My dad remembers being buzzed by a B52 in the early 1960s as a boy. He grew up on a farm about an hour east of Omaha. He says all he remembers is a window blew out as it flew so low, and he ran to his dad yelling "da bombah! da bombah!" - interesting time to be alive!
Are we just gonna totally forget that the Soviets took pictures of Venus??
So they could take pictures of a planet millions of miles away but not put a human on the moon a mere 248,000 miles away on average
why put russian on moon ?
@@fullcircle8231 yep. Late in the 1980s, the Soviets sent unmanned modules to take pictures of venus which were transmitted from venus back to earth. The cameras only lasted a little bit because of the atmosphere in venus, but pictures were taken and received. You can look them up too if you don't believe me
Great videos BTW Infographics
Nice animation :) I think that weapon like this should be banned.
very nice infographics
7:21
So you witnessed a missile? xD
Love your vids
I live by Vandenberg AFB and get to see a lot of these launches and tests for these and space launches. It’s pretty awesome being close by.
It is awesome being close by until there is a war with a nuclear power. Good luck!
Thx, love ur vids. Learn a lot from them
On historical accuracy, men in the 50 s would not have had that style of hair cut
Love the infografic show
How ironic; we may possibly be destroyed by something we created.
humanity in a nutshell. no species on earth is really capable of causing human extinction, and a natural disaster capable of that is probably pretty rare
Love this 😁
Tony Stark technology!
NAILED IT!
1st paragraph of Wiki contradicts this entire video
"The development of ICBMs in the 1950s rendered the concept of SLAMs obsolete. Advances in defensive ground radar also made the stratagem of low-altitude evasion ineffective. Although it never proceeded beyond the initial design and testing phase before being declared obsolete, the design contained several radical innovations as a nuclear delivery system. "
You do know Wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can simply pay to edit it right? ANYONE?
@@ragnarok9287 Not everything on Wikipedia is reliable, neither is UA-cam. Or anywhere else on the internet. However it would explain why these missiles aren't talked about more often.
Thx imma make one
Never been this early since...
*I can’t think of anything* 😬😬😂
Hi army!
Hellooo 😂😂
@@anisa-mf5nt love your profile pic btw
Thank youuu
@@anisa-mf5nt yup
The "Unstoppable Missile" is Unstoppable until you start it. Then it stops itself.
I bet they still have few of them laying around in a secret base...
Just incase.
I hope we do
"This is Falcon 3.0 cruise missle away"
Enemy cruise missile! Take cover!
I thought I was experiencing deja vu, but no...
3:59
"This is where Project Pluto stepped in and saw the potential in using ramjet engines to completely replace SAC's nuclear fleet with a fleet of unmanned nuclear missiles."
4:58
"This is where Project Pluto stepped in and saw the potential in using ramjet engines to completely replace SAC's nuclear fleet with a fleet of unmanned nuclear missiles."
Editing whoopsie. :P
I worry that you guys are churning out videos too quickly, and quality is suffering as a result.
I saw it too, not the 1st either
which is better,ramjet or scram.
I think that missile is cool!
Imagine what kind of weapons we have now, if this was over 40 years ago. Particle beams, railguns, weather manipulation and much more. This thing must be child's play compared to what is out there now.
Rail guns exist weather manipulation is not reasonable due to the amount of energy needed and particle beams do sort of exist, but they are not that useful in comparison to other more traditional weapons. (I will remind you that guns shoot a hunk of metal faster then the speed of sound using some powder)
You play red alert alot 😂😂
Oh wait... we do!
@@speedy01247 what this one sed.
Looks like I'm going to be busy in the garage for a little while.
They are banned under the Geneva convention and others.
Banned as what?
Laws don't really apply during war, unfortunately
“I am your captain, John Legos and the first officer is named *Nuclear Reactor*”
*Just call your friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man*
US: Comes up with insane missle
Geneva Convention: Can we take a look at that?
U.N security council: we'll pretend we didn't see that
I'm not ready for ww3
War has no laws.
Remember that.
there is a law
@@RC-bi7cp Most people do not care and brake it anyway.
But you are right there is actually a law .For example you can't use deadly gas as a weapon anymore.
But what are people going to do when the enemy uses gas anyway?
Call the police?
nuclear ramjet sounds like a technology that would have been useful for much more than a nuke delivery system.
A cool airplane that could fly for months on end
Yes, except it spews out radioactive exhaust as it flies…
This actually the only fun way to learn
What you used for the thumbnail was a prototype project named “Pluto” which could (in theory) fly for an unknown amount of time, dropping nuclear bombs on several targets. Upon running out of fuel it would fly low to the ground to expose as much land to radiation before crashing.
Edit: I started and finished writing this less than halfway through the video.
No one:
Nobody:
Adler: We've got a job to do
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
wat
@@tylerchambers6246 yeah
I love these
1. Ram jet invented in 1912 - Mach 4
2. First U2 spy plane in 1955 - Mach 3.5
3. Russia - we don’t have a missile fast enough to hit the U2 🤦♂️
Ussr did shot down a U2
I find this dude's channel hysterical
aight who let Freeman design a rocket
The slam missles sound awesome
As informative as this video is, one simple Google search was enough to find that the person who invented them said that the idea of the reactor as a secondary weapon is not feasible.
Why not? Maybe they just dont want a repeat of that time a boy scout made a nuclear reactor in his shed. Dont ever think you have all the governments information.
I never get bored watching the Infographics Show. Just sayin.
*That's exactly how your momma calls my ticket* 😏
12 minutes 113 people BABY YEET
Sven would survive the atomic bombs
America: let’s spend 2 million developing a pen to write in space
Russia: let’s use this pencil...
Nothing can be banned in real warfare
Theres that old guy again. Hes everywhere!!
This will be lost among all other comments, but i hope your having a amazing day reader! :)
Yeah,aight
Chivalry is never dead, it just changes faces.
And just think ... This SLAM completed development over 55 years ago. Re 1964 Just imagine what is out there now.
Mind controlling radio waves,
Plasma forcefields and UFO weapons that disable ships and planes,
Mind controlling food and internet,
Population controlling internet and infrastructure,
I mean don't even try to ask or find the truth, unless you want thousands of bad stuffs inside your head and go crazy tbh.
One thing for sure yet is that humanity haven't made a proper super human without some side effect on them things,
And they aren't closed enough for infinite energy generation yet.
You're welcome
M P I agree with you on all fronts 🎯🏁. Humbling ..I’ve engaged similar research and identified similar findings.
This is a beautiful weapon
I slept and woke up to 250 likes... thanks guys👍👏👏👏
kehinde isaac hehe not yet 😂😂
Ig 5 is the new 250
The first reliabble cruise missle in the US was the Snark Anti Aircraft Missle and had a speed of Mach2.5 only guidance systems and power plant designations have changed!
0:49
How dare you put Finland, Sweden etc. in the Soviet Union
Iivari Mantere ajattelin samaa
Whoah it came from my country
So. A fartfilled balloon, but bigger and nuclear.
This guy is on a spree!
7:25 he actually uses the girlfriend template
My elementary school outside DC had air raid sirens at the time in the 80s before the fall of The Wall, tested every Saturday morning if I remember right
Yaal it's fiiiine it's just my moded tnt cannon
The slam missile is truly a very beautiful idea. Evil but beautiful.
Can you in infograffic try. You VS TEEN TITANS GO. They can be funny and calm and in the next second they can be intense and brutal.
“But the us “never” choose to build them” Sure.
8 views but 35 likes okay 😂
Michael Myers Susan’s been drinking again
Aliens: *you created what to do what on your own kind?!*