Victoria and Abdul | The Queen's Speech

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2024
  • Queen Victoria (Judi Dench) summons the entire staff with commanding intensity.
    Film Synopsis:
    The extraordinary true story of an unexpected friendship in the later years of Queen Victoria's (Academy Award® winner Judi Dench) remarkable rule. When Abdul Karim (Ali Fazal), a young clerk, travels from India to participate in the Queen's Golden Jubilee, he is surprised to find favor with the Queen herself. As the Queen questions the constrictions of her long-held position, the two forge an unlikely and devoted alliance with a loyalty to one another that her household and inner circle all attempt to destroy. As the friendship deepens, the Queen begins to see a changing world through new eyes and joyfully reclaims her humanity.
    Subscribe to Focus Features: bit.ly/FocusFeaturesUA-cam
    Become a Focus Insider: insider.focusfeatures.com
    Website: www.focusfeatures.com
    Instagram: / focusfeatures
    Facebook: / focusfeatures
    Twitter: / focusfeatures
    #FocusFeatures #VictoriaAndAbdul #JudiDench
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @Reader1984
    @Reader1984 6 місяців тому +54

    Now that's my kind of Queen. She put everybody in their rightful place and reminded them that they SERVE HER. Got all of them running scared. Although I didn't agree with most of Victoria's policies and positions, you can't deny that she was a Capable and illustrious (Sometimes Dramatic, which I love) Queen til the end.

  • @peterrollinson-lorimer
    @peterrollinson-lorimer 3 місяці тому +2

    Dame Judy Dench is absolutely riveting in this role, as she is in every role. Suzie Izzard looks amazing as Bertie.

  • @timihobbs1992
    @timihobbs1992 5 місяців тому +1

    I love this film, I was hoping to see a clip of my favorite Queen's speech from this film. It was the bit in her private office where she says that accusing he of mental disfunction will not work, I love it.

  • @Emthe30something
    @Emthe30something 6 місяців тому +6

    On the watchlist!

  • @jorgechavarria4799
    @jorgechavarria4799 6 місяців тому +12

    I wished Judi would had done the last queen in her moments in The Crown so she would had done the three big queens in England / United Kingdom

    • @milesmartin4958
      @milesmartin4958 4 місяці тому +2

      Never say never! But it does indeed seem unlikely now given Judi’s age and her vision… She may no longer be with us by the time the world is ready for the final days of QE2 on screen.

  • @survivor648
    @survivor648 6 місяців тому +5

    I wish I enjoyed period movies because I love me my Dame Judi! I was going to watch just because of Judi but the only one I see isn’t the one with her in it.

  • @angelabby2379
    @angelabby2379 6 місяців тому +49

    idk why she got so uppity about sir / knighthood, there were plenty of absolutely atrocious people getting knighthood... as long as they are rich and influential (not always good)

    • @jcs1025
      @jcs1025 6 місяців тому +6

      It was a bigger deal back ‘in the day’

    • @angelabby2379
      @angelabby2379 6 місяців тому +6

      @@jcs1025 i think it was just a color racist thing, they couldn't care less if a chocolate factory owner who donated a lot of chocolate (so he can get knighthood) get one

    • @angelabby2379
      @angelabby2379 6 місяців тому +4

      @@jcs1025 i forgot but i read somewhere that they can even buy peerage but like the lowest one for a lot of money, baron or baronet ( you would be addressed as Sir and rank higher than knight) the Rothschild infamously obtained one and became Baron de Rothschild

    • @shimanopetermann9068
      @shimanopetermann9068 6 місяців тому

      but those people were white, that's the thing

    • @TechBearSeattle
      @TechBearSeattle 6 місяців тому +2

      @@angelabby2379 - That used to be the case: James VI/I allowed the rank to be sold for 1000 pounds as a hereditary knighthood as a way to raise money. The practice ended only in 1964, although Parliament gave the title to Margaret Thatcher in 1990 (gave, not sold.) Families that still had a legitimate claim to the title are still able to use it, however.

  • @chancellorjake
    @chancellorjake 6 місяців тому +21

    It's been a while since I last saw this. Is it on any streaming service?

    • @anathar8830
      @anathar8830 6 місяців тому +3

      I saw this on US Netflix last year, but I don’t know if it’s still there.

    • @user-de8tu8gt3e
      @user-de8tu8gt3e 3 місяці тому

      You can look up at putlocker

  • @jamielyallleathan
    @jamielyallleathan 6 місяців тому +11

    Never will a series be able to convey the true reality of Queen Victoria. History will do justice to his 63 years and 216 days of reign, but never a series! For me, that I am British and not a supporter of the monarchy, from my perspective as a history student, like Princess Margaret, Queen Victoria was a very forward-looking lady in her time!

    • @rafadantas.6872
      @rafadantas.6872 6 місяців тому +1

      Could I ask you why you are not a supporter of the Monarchy? 😔😔

    • @LordDim1
      @LordDim1 3 місяці тому +1

      To be a history student and not a supporter of the monarchy seems to be quite history-less. The monarchy is a fundamental part of Britain at every level

  • @58christiansful
    @58christiansful 6 місяців тому +29

    The real munshi seems to have been a manipulator. And grew podgy - nothing like the handsome and upright fictional representation. Servants and household hated him. But she adored him, infatuated, one suspects, as she had been with John Brown.

    • @angelabby2379
      @angelabby2379 6 місяців тому

      what showing bad side real history of POC.... that's racist and misogynistic

    • @Roheryn100
      @Roheryn100 6 місяців тому +16

      And her staff WEREN’T manipulators , obsessed with their own titles and positions ? 🤣🤣
      They were white. He wasn’t. Therefore…they were free to be prejudiced.
      How many administrators bothered to learn Urdu, like she did ?

    • @zzzbbbooo
      @zzzbbbooo 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Roheryn100 It was his BEHAVIOUR that turned them off - his sense of importance and him telling other servants (at the end of the day that is what he was too) that he was the Queen's favourite and he could do whatever he wanted irritated them. It wasn't that he wasn't white! The servants didn't like him, the other royals didn't like him.

    • @Roheryn100
      @Roheryn100 4 місяці тому

      @@zzzbbbooo Ever heard of the saying “History is written by the victors” ? The accounts we have are THEIR accounts. They won out in the end, but it doesn’t necessarily mean they were right. Of COURSE they would think he was a manipulator ! They could no longer be sure of getting THEIR way.

  • @richardc8795
    @richardc8795 6 місяців тому +6

    Too bad, the prince of Wales was so vile. Dirty Bertie should’ve also been put in his place.

  • @brendenhuerta21
    @brendenhuerta21 6 місяців тому +13

    They’re cowards, always have been, always will be.

  • @jaycristoval6155
    @jaycristoval6155 6 місяців тому +12

    He was an expert manipulator.... the queen didn't stand a chance.

    • @Roheryn100
      @Roheryn100 6 місяців тому +4

      She was a Grand Manipulator in her own right.

    • @wardarcade7452
      @wardarcade7452 6 місяців тому +8

      @@Roheryn100 Absolutely! From Lord M [Melbourne], to 'Dear John'[Brown] to 'Dizzy' [Benjamin Disraeli] even her 'Dearest Angel' Albert, Victoria never did agreed to anything that she herself didn't want to have happen- no matter how charming she considered any particular man! Granted, that Abdul wasn't above wanting (and getting) favors from her but if she herself hadn't wanted him to have any, she wouldn't have granted any! Besides, Victoria knew that for any servant or aide who resigned, there would be hundreds of applicants who'd have eagerly taken their places instead of staying in limbo or poverty!

  • @leemorrow9575
    @leemorrow9575 3 місяці тому

    Sure lets let wales manage our policies 😂 no point in us doing it. What would the irish know about their owe policies 😂

  • @nope24601
    @nope24601 6 місяців тому +1

    This was a disappointingly dull film. It could have been much more. But, perhaps it is straying from history, and so cannot go very far in its direction without being dismissed entirely.