Step-by-Step Guide: Constructing the Egyptian Pyramids (In-Depth Exploration)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2013
  • Learn all about the world of ancient engineering with our detailed step-by-step guide on the construction of the Egyptian Pyramids within Chris Massey's theory (Water Shaft Theory). This comprehensive video offers more than just a brief overview - it’s an in-depth journey through the intriguing Water Shaft Theory, with illustrations and pictures to clarify the stages and process.
    If you haven't yet seen them, then please enjoy my other videos:-
    The Theory (An animation expressing in simple terms the basis for my theory)
    • How were the pyramids ...
    The Experiment (A scale model to show the basic principles of my theory in action)
    • How were the pyramids ...
    Addendum 1 (Shaping the blocks in water - animation)
    • How the Pyramids of Eg...
    Addendum 2 (Multiple gates in the water shaft, how water pressure problems can be averted)
    • How the Pyramids of Eg...
    #pyramidsofegypt #ancientengineering #watershafttheory #egyptology #chrismassey #historicalmysteries
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13 тис.

  • @socratease4645
    @socratease4645 2 роки тому +155

    Oh man, wish I’d seen this before I built my first pyramid.

  • @jeenyus720
    @jeenyus720 9 років тому +5811

    I could see an Ancient Egyptian watching this and being like ""damn, why didnt we think of this?"

    • @ParallelPain
      @ParallelPain 9 років тому +525

      jeenyus720 No they'd think "No this is stupid. 9,600,000 liters of water is needed for the base alone, an 2,000 more liters every hour from evaporation. 10 years to construct a canal for just 6% of the stones? (94% of the stones were from the Gaza Plateau itself). The water would stagnate and become a giant puddle of disease ridden mosquito infected filth. And there's no way to make pipe door and compartments that are both *air* tight and easy enough to open, and there's no way to fix this if just one part of the pipe springs a leak/blockage/stuck doors."

    • @ajnode
      @ajnode 9 років тому +70

      ParallelPain
      ^I'm inclined to side with you on this one. I can imagine huge issues with blockages within the tunnels as well.

    • @DerDudelino
      @DerDudelino 9 років тому +48

      ParallelPain: on the other hand it would be much easier, than to drag all those stones from ships to the construction site. Not to forget that it's more than 40 degree in egypt for quite some months. Slaves would probably be able to pull of that tough work for a week, than get ill or die of exhaustion. The egypts had the best architects in the world, pretty sure they've figured out a smart way to filter the water somehow like the romans were doing with their aqueducts.

    • @UCvow2TUIH0d2Ax2vik9ILzg
      @UCvow2TUIH0d2Ax2vik9ILzg 9 років тому +150

      Der Dudelino The Pyramids were not built by slaves. It's a common myth.

    • @ParallelPain
      @ParallelPain 9 років тому +43

      Der Dudelino
      Building a path for water is A LOT easier than making an air tight compartment door that can be opened easily. Which we have no evidence of anyone figuring out how to do before modern materials and engineering because it's downright impossible.
      And dragging the blocks using pulley/lever/rollers plus wetting the sand is far simpler than any of this. And requires less labor than digging a canal and then constructing that stone pipping. And we actually have pictorial evidence for it.

  • @gorillazilla4534
    @gorillazilla4534 2 роки тому +611

    The waterway system is considerably more complicated than the actual pyramid. It's like building a computer to control your toaster.

    • @fiacmar
      @fiacmar 2 роки тому +28

      It’s like convincing the whole country to help you build a computer to control your toaster.

    • @zach458
      @zach458 2 роки тому +8

      this is taught to 5th graders. not complicated

    • @imacmill
      @imacmill 2 роки тому +25

      @@zach458 _this is taught to 5th graders. not complicated_
      You keep propagating this assertion...can you provide proof that 5th grade teachers teach water elevator theory to 5th graders?

    • @gorillazilla4534
      @gorillazilla4534 2 роки тому +20

      @@zach458 they also teach there is an infinite number of genders....

    • @zach458
      @zach458 2 роки тому +1

      @@gorillazilla4534 this is over engineered???? You should look at the shit they do now. This is simple. Saying this isn’t possible is anti science and anti history

  • @ontheroadwithyode390
    @ontheroadwithyode390 7 місяців тому +7

    I watched this out of curiosity. I needed a good chuckle.

  • @daviddimovski9595
    @daviddimovski9595 3 роки тому +51

    Finally! a step by step guide to building one of these things, all we need now is to have Ikea produce it in flat-pack form.

  • @mattthepolarbear
    @mattthepolarbear 4 роки тому +1989

    the only thing i've learned from reading this comment section is that there are a lot more pyramid engineers out there than i thought

    • @mattthepolarbear
      @mattthepolarbear 4 роки тому +24

      okay

    • @GoldNkid4334
      @GoldNkid4334 4 роки тому +22

      @ you're going places.

    • @kanchabeni6743
      @kanchabeni6743 4 роки тому +15

      after seeing this comments, i realize people actually give a shit about pyramid LOL

    • @amputefedex
      @amputefedex 4 роки тому +31

      @@Lamster66 This is not even about building the pyramids, its just basic physics, just because an idea sounds good, doesnt mean it is.

    • @babywise2096
      @babywise2096 4 роки тому +2

      Exactly

  • @JMW_JMW_JMW
    @JMW_JMW_JMW Рік тому +3

    Men of culture, usually we meet under different kind of videos but today we are united in our interest in pyramid engineering.

  • @pihi42
    @pihi42 Рік тому +26

    While this seems perhaps plausible at a first glance, just consider this. Floating a block up the shaft comes with a price: an equal amount of water (by weight) travels down the shaft. Consequently, the weight of water that would need to be carried up to the top of the "water shaft" to replace the water travelling down+ leakage etc. would exceed the weight of the blocks being lifted. So, the manual work would actually increase; it is not easier to carry 2 tons of water than it is to carry 2 tons of rock up the pyramid. Not counting the need to carry floatation down the pyramid, work to build and maintain all the complicated shafts.. And working in murky, mosquito-infested water all day till your hands dissolve is not such a great working environment as this video would like it to be. Chiselling stone under water? Hmm.

    • @alde1611
      @alde1611 Рік тому +4

      You are right, but it is certainly easier to carry 2 tonnes of water than to carry one, 2 tonne block.

    • @vivazapata123
      @vivazapata123 Рік тому +4

      @@alde1611 You must be the type of person that when asked "what is heavier, a ton of steal or a ton of feathers?" answers confidently "a ton of steal".

    • @420rogerz
      @420rogerz Рік тому +3

      @@vivazapata123 From scientific work load point of view they are equal, they take the same energy to move. That doesn't mean its easier. Everything is easy on paper. I tell you to move a 2000 pound block of steel 100 feet or 100x20 pounds of steel the same distance just using your hands and see which one gets done first.

    • @frankenfaq4706
      @frankenfaq4706 Рік тому +2

      Imagine cutting block in river water not to mention all the excess material coming off the blocks. Does someone swim down there and remove all the scrap ?

    • @FediMayn
      @FediMayn Рік тому +1

      You forget the fact that they were doing this for more than a couple of decades. It was a main part of their sustainability

  • @DBLDoG
    @DBLDoG 5 років тому +870

    Excellent video, great graphics and totally explains the theory !
    Don't believe a word of it, but I enjoyed watching it !

    • @TheReal_Dom
      @TheReal_Dom 5 років тому +25

      Gibson SG lmao

    • @swindle2240
      @swindle2240 5 років тому +20

      LMAO Facts

    • @darkambience
      @darkambience 5 років тому +16

      Agree, the water around the pyramid would not be flowing and would quickly become stagnant especially with all of those bodies inside, carrying many pathogens, along with fertile breeding for billions upon billions of disease carrying mosquitos. The workforce would be decimated in a fortnight. Now if the pyramid wasn't built on a plateau and part of a river had been diverted into a canal then it would seem plausible.

    • @charliebogaerts7725
      @charliebogaerts7725 5 років тому +26

      @@darkambience But isnt the water continuously being refreshed by the high pressure tunnels in the pyramids?

    • @TheyCallMeCyborg
      @TheyCallMeCyborg 5 років тому +9

      @@darkambience the water doesnt have to be flowing. do you still float in a pool? does a pool have "flowing" water?

  • @AriesKJJ2
    @AriesKJJ2 3 роки тому +285

    I really enjoy how loosely the term "easily" is tossed around 😀

    • @im1who84u
      @im1who84u 2 роки тому +2

      Like most things in life... It's all relative.

    • @davepowell7168
      @davepowell7168 2 роки тому +1

      @@douglasfarwell6379 The guys who did this weren't using aqualungs or gills so Oldmanpower had the job.

    • @hellbenderdesign
      @hellbenderdesign 2 роки тому +2

      It's so easy to build an ancient water tight elevator system 500 feet above ground, but listen to him bend over backwards when describing the difficulty of dirt ramps.

    • @zach458
      @zach458 2 роки тому

      this principle he talks about is taught to 5th graders

  • @Josh86_925
    @Josh86_925 2 роки тому +16

    The engineering behind this 5,000 years ago is truly amazing

  • @ocrun6765
    @ocrun6765 Рік тому +5

    Very clever theory. One would think that something this novel would have warranted a hieroglyph or painting somewhere along the lines.

  • @richardwilliams2004
    @richardwilliams2004 3 роки тому +744

    The water lift would be a more impressive engineering project than the pyramid itself.

    • @davepowell7168
      @davepowell7168 2 роки тому

      Yes, that's why it's Xxxxxx.

    • @jaslll4396
      @jaslll4396 2 роки тому +46

      I have always said don't use a smart guy to design stuff, use the lazy guy as he will get it done the easiest way. This looks to be the smart guys idea.

    • @jammcguire1276
      @jammcguire1276 2 роки тому +9

      Not from their perspective if it was something they did for other things as well. No matter how they did it, they left no instructions for any of the structures to include the pyramids. The Egyptians were so attached to the Nile that they felt sorry for other civilizations that had to wait for the 'Nile in the Sky' to grow crops. Whatever the method, it was something mundane and didn't seem worth noting for future generations. Look at the Mult-Station Modem chip in the cell phones used around the world today, just 100 years ago, it would have been the most amazing thing ever heard of and would have taken a massive infrastructure to make that is now, although specialized to be sure, normal to manufacture. The pyramids are so old, that even the Roman Republic would have been looking at them the way we look at the Roman Republic today. To move massive stones, the Romans would use gigantic wheels with the stones themselves being the axle that is ingeniously simple when you think about it as these are stones that are 100s of tons. However the Egyptians built their structures, like many other things, they just didn't seem to think it was that important to document in any fashion.

    • @LSD123.
      @LSD123. 2 роки тому +14

      It's absurd..

    • @richardwilliams2004
      @richardwilliams2004 2 роки тому +12

      @@jammcguire1276 I can confirm that it wasn’t built using a water shaft elevator, anyone saying “yeah plausible” in the comment section are thick as dog s*it there’s no nice way to put it

  • @Exce1si0r
    @Exce1si0r 2 роки тому +635

    Using this theory, I feel like building the pyramid was the easy part. Building a vertical air tight water tunnel is much easier said than done. Currently the deepest pool in the world is roughly 200ft. Now try doing that above ground 500ft, and make some doorways to hold in the water pressure. 😂

    • @theresakruse1655
      @theresakruse1655 2 роки тому +20

      They didn't have to do that.
      Drain the water after each level. Fill with sand, replace watertight floor and flood. Repeat for each level.

    • @engraciofuluyafoy6404
      @engraciofuluyafoy6404 2 роки тому +49

      maintaining millions of gallons of water held tight is much too hard,. Another challenge is pumping water high above.

    • @b_061_makyasabdurrahman9
      @b_061_makyasabdurrahman9 2 роки тому +10

      Easy one! just make the distance of each doorways not to far (50ft or so), so each doorways can still hold the
      water pressure of each section. and use pulley to open and close the doorways.
      Not need to be 100% air tight just water tight, leak a little here and there are acceptable.
      The water which is reduced due to leak can be refilled with bucket, rope, pulley, and brute force (they have thousands of slave there..)
      just my speculation, not an expert...

    • @walterF205
      @walterF205 2 роки тому +20

      LOL Only the amount of water in the rising pipe would be enough to make it explode. Tons and tons of water. The first infiltration will dig the way for the tube to collapse.

    • @AKPrajapati
      @AKPrajapati 2 роки тому +26

      True. So they're saying they couldn't build wheels but could make such shafts to lift 1-1.5 ton stone blocks. far-fetched.

  • @karaDee2363
    @karaDee2363 Рік тому +1

    Finally a more logical explanation of how the pyramids were built... And blocks were carved with precision.... It's something I've often thought about for years and seemed the most plausible.....

    • @gdiwolverinemale4th
      @gdiwolverinemale4th 11 годин тому

      It is not logical at all. The pressure on the bottom gate would be enormous. What material would be used to make it and how would the gate be held in place?

  • @Stroshan
    @Stroshan 9 місяців тому +6

    I love the theory and the videos! I especially love the demonstration of the working water elevator, it made me think about ways to use this idea for a modern invention or two… I can see how floating the blocks could and maybe even did work to get the blocks to the building site, but; Unfortunately, it seems to me, there are lot of challenges to overcome for this system to really work. Just to mention one, how could they have efficiently pumped that much water up to the top of the pyramid? The other elephant in the room is the problems of constructing a leak proof and strong enough water tube… still I really do love the idea, super creative and inventive. Great food for thought. Thanks for all the time and work you’ve put in to this. I really think you could apply this idea to present day needs and make big money…

  • @tedschuurmans
    @tedschuurmans 3 роки тому +1345

    Show me one 80 ton limestone block floating on cedar wood and air filled hides, and I won't ask any more questions ..

    • @animekiss3311
      @animekiss3311 3 роки тому +17

      remind u the weight could be differ based on the hardness limestone gets hard when its contacted with co2 so they kept it in water and polish out

    • @animekiss3311
      @animekiss3311 3 роки тому +64

      Seawise Giant, later Happy Giant, Jahre Viking, Knock Nevis, Oppama, and Mont, was a ULCC supertanker that was the longest ship ever, built by Sumitomo Heavy Industries in Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan. It possessed the greatest deadweight tonnage ever recorded. Fully loaded, its displacement was 657,019 tonnes.
      You can make anything float. info from below comment

    • @RayWilliamJohansen
      @RayWilliamJohansen 3 роки тому +81

      @The Amazingly Randy but you would need a fucking ocean, in other words, you would have to flood the whole fucking area to create enough pressure to make something that heavy float.

    • @Grrtt4570
      @Grrtt4570 3 роки тому +50

      @@RayWilliamJohansen I believe you have missed the point sir, but that's ok. Let's not forget about the Nile being much, much closer to the pyramids in ancient times.

    • @RayWilliamJohansen
      @RayWilliamJohansen 3 роки тому +23

      @@Grrtt4570 Fair enough but a river is flowing and I am still unconvinced as to how feasible this would have been, give a number of things, working with heavy objects, in water, all of that seems nice but most likely not practical.

  • @TheSnowwdog
    @TheSnowwdog 5 років тому +174

    So I know this is an old upload but out of curiosity I looked up the book on Amazon
    Hardcover prices range from $438 - $777 used !!
    For those prices those books better be signed by the Pharaohs

    • @robertbrandywine
      @robertbrandywine 4 роки тому +3

      Look outside of Amazon. Sometimes Amazon charges really rip-off prices.

    • @citizenblue
      @citizenblue 4 роки тому +4

      Or the Annunaki...

    • @TR4R
      @TR4R 4 роки тому +1

      Offer and demand, dude. I know it's absurd but this book is really expensive because it is not printed anymore, it's almost imposible to buy it, but I don't care about it either.

    • @slevinshafel9395
      @slevinshafel9395 4 роки тому +1

      @@robertbrandywine that is monopolyo work. that is why no all time buy on amazon. need competitors.

    • @delalias5754
      @delalias5754 4 роки тому

      buy the epub for $12

  • @artmaknev3738
    @artmaknev3738 Рік тому +3

    Interesting theory, that might also explain massive water erosion around the Sphynx walls.

    • @MisterCrookedNose
      @MisterCrookedNose Рік тому

      Yes, I think that water erosion is from a man-made water structure

  • @alexaavery8574
    @alexaavery8574 11 місяців тому +2

    FASCINATING! Even if we dont know how any pyramid was made. Simply fascinating!

  • @ezra3893
    @ezra3893 3 роки тому +76

    Thanks, man for this step by step guide now I am going to build my own Pyramid.

    • @beamazed1162
      @beamazed1162 9 місяців тому

      1. There are not a lot of bronzes unearthed in Egypt. The latest archeology proves that they were built by construction workers, not slaves. Slaves can eat high-quality beef and can be buried near the pyramids. 2. There is no history of bronze wares in Europe, only a very small amount of bronze is fished out of the water or bought from the antique market, so it is impossible to measure carbon 14 (compared with Sanxingdui in China to see what bronze wares can be measured by carbon 14) 3. There is no such thing in Europe Astronomical calendar (there are many observatory sites in China, there are no such sites in Europe, and it takes hundreds or thousands of years of continuous observation, calculation, and accumulation to have a calendar) 4. There is no unified weights and measures in Europe, and China has unified weights and measures for more than 2,000 years. Many instruments related to measurement have been unearthed in China. There is no unified weights and measures in Europe, so where does advanced arithmetic come from? History cannot be recorded until there has been no change for thousands of years. For the above points, can anyone overthrow it? If it cannot be overthrown, then ancient Babylon (someone obtained a cuneiform dictionary and translated clay tablets?), ancient Egypt, and ancient Greece are all false. Ancient Rome was a very small place not a great empire, let alone a civilization. If you look at the technology of the Song Dynasty in China and the Sanxingdui site, you will know the reason. Note that the first steam engine-driven car was also in China, but it is a pity that the Ming Dynasty, the creator of civilization, was stolen by barbarian Manchus and European missionaries, and rewritten the real history. 6. If Babylonian civilization is as great as described in textbooks, why is writing still written on clay tablets? Why not use noble sheepskin? 7. There is no such a grammatical dictionary for cuneiform, which can allow ordinary people to translate these clay tablets into modern characters. If there is no such dictionary, then they can make fakes at will.
      The ancient nautical chart of ancient Egypt is marked as Babylon, which is the map of China 600 years ago(it was codified by European missionaries to 1601):
      www.loc.gov/item/2010585650/
      This is a map of Europe:commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geographia_by_Ptolemy,_Aphricae_Tabula_III,_1540_Basel_edition_-_Maps_of_Africa_-_Robert_C._Williams_Paper_Museum_-_DSC00625.JPG

  • @FrankCarrozzo
    @FrankCarrozzo 4 роки тому +303

    Aliens: we can make rocks gravitate
    Egypt: *no we cool bro we got the water pipes*

    • @KamalikaMukherjee81
      @KamalikaMukherjee81 4 роки тому +8

      This comment deserves more appreciation! 🤣

    • @mcfcguvnors
      @mcfcguvnors 3 роки тому +4

      cant even get water to starving people in 2020 but can make 75 ton granite blocks go uphill...in water ! :D comedy gold

    • @ionelhantulie4368
      @ionelhantulie4368 3 роки тому +1

      @@mcfcguvnors Read the book ( NO MONEY ) ” THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT ” , on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com On a 26.5° inclined "main inner mobile ramp" located in the "central channel" of the Great Gallery, about 150 workers with the help of a system of traction levers of order 2 with a height of 5 m in which the active force arm "F1 of workers" is b1 = 5 m . The arm of the resistant force "F2 = Gt ( tangential component of the weight of the stone block) + Ff (friction force given by the weight of the stone block on the sled") is b2 = 1 m, can pull closer and closer on the "main inner mobile ramp" inclined at 26.5° [~ 1,24 m. (distance traveled by b2) X 70 elevations = 87 m. (40 m. length of ascending passage + 47 m. length the "central channel" of the Great Gallery)] a stone block of 60 tons in an "elementary" simple and easy way up to a height of 43 m. for the construction of the King's Chamber. In this case on the " main inner mobile ramp " the lever of order 2 serves to multiply by 5 times the workers traction active force of F1. You can find drawings and explanations on page 32 ~ 43 on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com in English or Romanian (no money , 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Romana ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; ). Leave a comment if you can! Have a nice day. Thanks for watching! Hănțulie Ionel

    • @ionelhantulie4368
      @ionelhantulie4368 3 роки тому

      READ THE BOOK ; READ THE BOOK ; READ THE BOOK, THE SECRETS OF BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF EGYPT, which has completely new theories about this subject ( WITHOUT MONEY) on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com , accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Română ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; NO MONEY )
      I'm open to hearing new ideas and new arguments. Pragmatic people always cling to the popular proverb, burning those on the "Galileans" who claim that the world isn't flat ,or that the universe revolves around it ; so I prefer to give everyone a chance to present something new; YOU NEVER KNOW ?, (what if one of the 78 novelties proposed in the book on page 57 , is finally accepted ? ). Have a nice day. Thanks for watching!
      Hănțulie Ionel.

    • @jerrykingsley6703
      @jerrykingsley6703 3 роки тому +4

      @@ionelhantulie4368 no

  • @movinon216
    @movinon216 2 роки тому +5

    very compelling theory indeed. it sparks the imagination regarding the use of aquatics. I remember the lady that put forth the idea that sails were used to move the huge blocks about and I thought that was very interesting. now add the use of huge stone floatation and hydro atmospheric pressers and your just about there. best I've seen yet. thank you. in these ancient times humans would've been understanding water - hydrodynamics a lot more bluntly than needed today

  • @robkerns4997
    @robkerns4997 2 роки тому +5

    That was completely amazing , I like this theory ... the next crazy part to figure out is how, how did they get the pyramids in perfect alignment with the cardinal directions ( N , E , S & W ) . TY very much for the movie, I will be looking for the book, again to for sharing.

    • @gyengez
      @gyengez Рік тому

      that one is actually easy using the shadow of the sun.

  •  2 роки тому +48

    "a detailed step by step guide"
    Pharaoh: taking notes

  • @salamjihad3449
    @salamjihad3449 3 роки тому +385

    MY GUESS IS THAT THEY STARTED AT THE BOTTOM AND WORKED THEIR WAY TO THE TOP !!

    • @heavycurrent7462
      @heavycurrent7462 3 роки тому +56

      No. They certainly started stacking from the top down.

    • @georgeisaak5321
      @georgeisaak5321 3 роки тому +19

      This is exactly how they have done it , the difference is that they didn't need to quarry the stones and transfer them in place , they did something far more efficient and intelligent , they used molds and the land provided all the ingredients needed to mix with water and create artificial stones with something similar to what we call concrete .

    • @salamjihad3449
      @salamjihad3449 3 роки тому +7

      @@georgeisaak5321 LOL

    • @georgeisaak5321
      @georgeisaak5321 3 роки тому +5

      @@salamjihad3449 laugh all you like, it doesn't change anything and you know it.

    • @salamjihad3449
      @salamjihad3449 3 роки тому +4

      @@georgeisaak5321 IM LAUGHING BECAUSE YOU THINK EGYPTIANS DID IT !!

  • @TalismanianDevil
    @TalismanianDevil 14 днів тому

    One only needs to witness the operation of locking sluice gates in a major canal to see the power of hydraulics. Many ancient civilizations used them for aqueducts, harbours, irrigation, public baths and other building projects. The interior chambers are a massively scaled gravity fed hydraulic ram pump. Best theory yet.

  • @adamanskii
    @adamanskii 2 роки тому +3

    thank you so much🙏🙏the blocks on mine lately were so hard to solidify, now mine are perfect 👍

  • @enilenis
    @enilenis 5 років тому +222

    Rectangular water shafts - horrible idea from an engineering perspective. They would not be able to sustain the pressure, nevermind having a number of water-tight gates with perfect seals. The height would produce a strong vacuum near the top of the tube. Managing pressure distribution would be impossible. Even the demo plexiglass tubes don't deal with actual heights and volumes of water involved. It's easy to calculate what kind of stress water would produce at 42 floors if taken up a pipe. Additionally, there would be no way to quickly extract the ropes from under the stones perfectly every time, while having the stones fit with laser precision. There'd be ropes stuck between and under stones everywhere, yet we find nothing between the stones. Water buoyancy, is a good theory, however for transporting stones to the pyramid base. It would explain why the structure had to be lowered by 8m, as if to contain something. I think this system works to the lowest level, but then stones are taken up differently. Where are the id markings? The stones aren't random but strategically placed. What about granite portions? Were those floated too? Even in the pictures provided in the video, the workers are shown near the tops of the stones, implying they could've delivered them and worked on them while the stones were still submerged. That's a silly assumption, considering where the stone would be relative to the water surface if the floats were attached. Each stone would be more than 1m below the surface. Good luck working a block that deep. And if the rope snaps, how do you reattach it? How do you troubleshoot, when everything's submerged? It makes the technique more sophisticated than the problem it's trying to solve.

    • @elkabeerthebigger9480
      @elkabeerthebigger9480 5 років тому +1

      its perfect idea to reduce cranes cost, a lot of opening shafts available in the towers they can use, just fill it by water and close from the top and use gates

    • @moosehead4497
      @moosehead4497 4 роки тому +7

      Certainly doesn't explain the stones in the king chamber or in the channel leading up, but definitely water shafts and canals a better theory than the leading egyptologist ramp dragging theory smh

    • @aldenunion
      @aldenunion 4 роки тому +1

      On a 13 acre land base,to keep true with 8 sides,would of utilized a large central tower of block ,not only to keep true center up,but as a hoist to lift each block.To prove is a central core, I thought when kid climbed to top,he could of got GPS mark but then to check inside signal wont go through the block to prove.Once they got up halfway,easy enough to stand another long tall block for rest of lift crane.With a rope and mathematical measurements ,could math out to still keep true by measuring in a circle around existing structure from center.(rope length from central tower\Axis).Easy enough manner to constantly assure of true because first run was around extruded mound they had "X-ed" out from jump street already in the block bed.

    • @kevinm9
      @kevinm9 4 роки тому +3

      Couldn't agree more, well said.

    • @asaenvolk
      @asaenvolk 4 роки тому +6

      I was thinking the same thing... how the hall would they have such good water seals at that time.

  • @SONNENKVLT
    @SONNENKVLT 4 роки тому +27

    Thanks for the Tutorial, can't wait to try building my own Pyramids of Egypt tomorrow.

    • @amer1960
      @amer1960 2 роки тому +1

      Go on I'll modify your body to mummy 😂

  • @gardoomforge8273
    @gardoomforge8273 Рік тому +4

    As far as I know the base block are made of granite stone which is one of the hardest we can nowadays cut it only with diamond saw or laser tech. The the surface is made of lime stone to have the white and smooth appearance.

    • @pedros1917
      @pedros1917 7 місяців тому

      well, you dont know very far dont you

  • @HooniCoonCustoms
    @HooniCoonCustoms Рік тому +3

    Love it. It's all very plausible. Missing one major fact though right from the beginning.. the blocks were granite, not limestone

    • @michaelrea8090
      @michaelrea8090 10 місяців тому

      The pyramids are not made of granite

  • @Gigatless
    @Gigatless 9 років тому +200

    To be honest, I'd rather believe that aliens built them.

    • @derpman909
      @derpman909 9 років тому +15

      ***** yah we know you would dummy

    • @Jackmono1
      @Jackmono1 9 років тому

      ***** Why?

    • @supraguy4694
      @supraguy4694 9 років тому +5

      Jackmono1 Is is REALLY that far fetched? I think the idea of Alien visitations in the past makes almost more sense than aliens visiting in the modern human era. I think they would rather be intervening when human society is still rather young and in an age where alien visitations would be regarded as "gods" visiting Earth, rather than today, when we have knowledge of potential other worlds and the idea of extraterrestrial civilizations, which combined with our much larger, more communicationaly savvy populace (internet/phones) could cause mass panic.

    • @ChrisAshtear
      @ChrisAshtear 9 років тому +7

      ***** it is- because that tv show leaves out tons of important details. How did they cut stone? they used a flat copper 'saw' and sprinkled sand on top of the block and grinded it away with the saw+sand. This has been demonstrated.
      If you look up Houdins hypothesis of how the pyramids were built its not that out of the way for what the egyptians were already doing. Internal Ramp, the grand gallery was a counterweight system. Theres evidence inside the grand gallery for that(friction marks and worn away stone at stress points)
      Personally, while alien visitation is of course always possible, I think its insulting to our ancestors to think that they couldnt POSSIBLY have constructed these monuments without outside help. And figuring out the simple methods that were used give you a new appreciation of how brilliant some of them were.

    • @Compendyum
      @Compendyum 9 років тому

      ***** For the small minded that's indeed far fetched. Yet, Lord Of the Rings was sooooooo real.

  • @deserteffect1001
    @deserteffect1001 2 роки тому +51

    Bro imagine dozens of documentaries all imagining how Egyptians built the Pyramids and they still can't get a 100% explanation and still theorizing LMAO. Aye, Egyptians are master constructors, to this day.

    • @davepowell7168
      @davepowell7168 2 роки тому +1

      Wider canal would help.

    • @carolelerman9686
      @carolelerman9686 2 роки тому +1

      If it was the Egytians.

    • @davepowell7168
      @davepowell7168 2 роки тому

      @@carolelerman9686 aliens were too expensive, the 'gypts of the east seem most likely culprits. Confessions can be false though.?

    • @vilmos1584
      @vilmos1584 2 роки тому +3

      We know exactly , how they built the piramids, only we cant accept it. We cant comprehend, what insane power do you can have, if you are the main priest and the earthborn son of the sun, who pray every morning to the sun to rise up.
      Now you say your whole country to come up and work for you, for 20-25 years. The population was 1-1.5 million in that time, and "only" needed 15-20 thousands, max 40thousand workers. Which looks insane, by modern standards and modern mindset.
      (also, these were capable masons, not slaves)
      Also, this water elewator with 1.5 cubic meter airtight waterskins, and reed mattes and reed ropes, that can withold 1.5 tonnes of force is bullshit.

    • @davepowell7168
      @davepowell7168 2 роки тому

      @@vilmos1584 Until l ' read more ' l thought you were disrespectful of our ancestors. Clever delivery, thankyou.

  • @sparky7915
    @sparky7915 Рік тому +1

    Imagine building a pyramid without the use of lasers or computers or engineering drawings!
    It is simply an incredible accomplishment that we can not duplicate to this very day!!

  • @grxengine
    @grxengine Рік тому

    One good rain and this entire project is toast.

  • @firemusic82
    @firemusic82 9 років тому +169

    I love reading comments. It's hilarious...humans today can't fathom building the pyramids by hand. So, it's impossible for humans who lived thousands of years ago had the brain power to engineer them. Today we look at ourselves as geniuses because we've created the "smart phone". However, take a man's smart phone away and he forgets how to wipe his own ass. Our technology is just an invented brain.

    • @mds8384
      @mds8384 9 років тому +20

      That is so false I can't even believe you just said that.

    • @phantomkrel2374
      @phantomkrel2374 9 років тому +3

      I see some Truth in his words.
      I mean you can have computers do Math for you, To figure stuff out or to give you information from someone who has all ready figured something else out.

    • @mds8384
      @mds8384 9 років тому +7

      Sethdarkus Yes, but the outcome of that is you find out the answer. Back then either you were rich enough to be educated and know the solution, or you just didn't worry about it.

    • @TWENTYFO5
      @TWENTYFO5 9 років тому +6

      Yea, cuz people weren't wiping their asses before smart phones?

    • @firemusic82
      @firemusic82 9 років тому +6

      Yes we were ass wiping pros before smart phones. We use our technology to think for us these days. Take our technology away and we're lost.

  • @simjdel7899
    @simjdel7899 4 роки тому +188

    They built the pyramid for skateboarding championship where egypt was the host.

    • @green_warlock
      @green_warlock 3 роки тому +14

      "Check out, it's Tony Hawtep's turn"

    • @simjdel7899
      @simjdel7899 3 роки тому +3

      @@green_warlock theres Jamie Bestwick what the hell is he doing there😝😎

    • @ionelhantulie4368
      @ionelhantulie4368 3 роки тому

      Go to www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com , accessing „Read fragments” ; ( 1 - MENU / Menu ; 2 - ENGLISH / Romana ; 3 - FRAGMENTS OF THE BOOK / Fragmente din carte ; 4 - Comments / Comentarii ; no money ) and have some comment. Hănțulie Ionel

    • @simjdel7899
      @simjdel7899 3 роки тому

      @@ionelhantulie4368 its the trap door revelation

    • @simjdel7899
      @simjdel7899 3 роки тому

      @@kibblexbabe2516 thats what you think...egypt king ride the chariot that looks like a sled?lol

  • @ruffrider2626
    @ruffrider2626 2 роки тому +27

    That is interesting. I'd love to see someone proof this out one day. Thanks for putting this together. Regardless of whether it is right or wrong, its a different idea that has been thought through and put forward. Good stuff! Cheers.

    • @alextomlinson
      @alextomlinson 2 роки тому

      If it’s proof you’re after look up Joseph Davidovits. He has analysed rock samples and done experiments and has pretty much confirmed that the pyramid blocks were made out of a semi-dry concrete-type mix and poured into place

    • @mjmellan
      @mjmellan 2 роки тому

      Dont you mean prove? Not proof like a waterproof coat!

    • @ruffrider2626
      @ruffrider2626 2 роки тому +5

      @@mjmellan noun
      noun: proof; plural noun: proofs
      1.
      evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.
      I'm honestly impressed that someone thought about grammar on youtube. You get props for that. If you could help people learn how to use their/they're/there correctly, I'd be a huge fan.

    • @suckmynose000
      @suckmynose000 Рік тому

      @@ruffrider2626 Owned

    • @ruffrider2626
      @ruffrider2626 Рік тому

      @@mjmellan I meant "proof this out." Otherwise known in academia, "Get us some proofs bro."

  • @jasonyoung2121
    @jasonyoung2121 2 роки тому +1

    All the documentaries I have watched on ancient Egypt, I have never seen this theory.

  • @Toasty-du3fl
    @Toasty-du3fl 4 роки тому +400

    after a week of following this tutorial, i got arrested for building without a permit

    • @Toasty-du3fl
      @Toasty-du3fl 4 роки тому +5

      @@Lamster66 damn

    • @KimWingz
      @KimWingz 4 роки тому +1

      lol

    • @leftnutrulez
      @leftnutrulez 4 роки тому

      ROFL!!!

    • @tombutcher3021
      @tombutcher3021 4 роки тому +7

      Weird because I am currently in prison for whipping my slaves too much and not giving them a lunch break.

    • @Toasty-du3fl
      @Toasty-du3fl 4 роки тому +1

      Tom Butcher that must hurt

  • @KevinGeneFeldman
    @KevinGeneFeldman 4 роки тому +281

    And I have trouble mounting a TV on my wall.

  • @samueljackson6188
    @samueljackson6188 Рік тому +2

    Id love to test your water theory out.
    Here in Oklahoma we have a huge lake and there is a quarry in Davis.
    Bet we could persuade Dolse to give us a giant block.
    Although the animal bladder would have to be substituted for rubber ones.

  • @frankgrillo8331
    @frankgrillo8331 Рік тому +2

    I cant believe how easy this is. Did you do this in your sandbox?

  • @gcwrestling888
    @gcwrestling888 7 років тому +730

    if this is true, you know they were pissing in the water all shift long

    • @gfarrell80
      @gfarrell80 7 років тому +31

      Best comment on here.

    • @Jonalexher
      @Jonalexher 7 років тому +8

      lmao

    • @francocinelli7369
      @francocinelli7369 7 років тому +10

      SHITIN 2~! N WACKIN OFF PERHAPS!LOL

    • @szaki
      @szaki 7 років тому +9

      Shit too!

    • @szaki
      @szaki 7 років тому +24

      Than drinking it, if the slave water girl was not fast enough! LOL!

  • @subliminal9144
    @subliminal9144 3 роки тому +50

    Thank you for this detailed tutorial. You could've also specified more about the materials, I'm concerned that my back yard pyramid will colapse, but very good totarial

    • @BobSmith-un5mw
      @BobSmith-un5mw Рік тому +1

      How did you build a back yard pyramid, any info on it?

    • @sirmounted8499
      @sirmounted8499 Рік тому +1

      @@BobSmith-un5mw dude this video is a step by step guide on how to do it, you can't follow easy instructions or what?

  • @darcycardinal6275
    @darcycardinal6275 2 роки тому

    This is why Zahi Hawass is always skeptical about "the truth" on how the pyramids are built. Thanks.

  • @aeodian
    @aeodian Рік тому +2

    Seeing this done on a small scale would be incredible

    • @aeodian
      @aeodian Рік тому +1

      The entire process of building it) The real life small scale example of water pressure was great

    • @Jittrippin2050
      @Jittrippin2050 10 днів тому

      @@aeodianhe should use stones instead of plastic tube to further prove this theory

  • @MrThedonhead
    @MrThedonhead 4 роки тому +594

    This seems quite far fetched... I’m sticking with the aliens theory

    • @mickmc1705
      @mickmc1705 4 роки тому +26

      @John Dough the aliens were the giants

    • @CrossPurposes
      @CrossPurposes 4 роки тому +15

      Well the remains of non-human elongated scull people are still in existence. And the rocks to build the pyramids were cut using machine tools, because the deep power-saw marks are still in evidence.

    • @t_mckenna999
      @t_mckenna999 4 роки тому +14

      they used SOUND to levitate the blocks into place. the also use sound for cutting stones, healing, harvesting energy and more.

    • @blargblarg-jargon9607
      @blargblarg-jargon9607 4 роки тому +1

      the pyramids were wardenclyffe towers that supplied energy to the machines that shaped the cities.

    • @Coolness18304
      @Coolness18304 4 роки тому +3

      @@mickmc1705 👀 i see you. You got some knowledge. Where did you get it

  • @yapyap66
    @yapyap66 3 роки тому +152

    I will say something positive about this video
    it's a very interesting theory and well presented

    • @Pauly421
      @Pauly421 Рік тому

      You mean aside from being practically impossible?

  • @sandrapotter6897
    @sandrapotter6897 Рік тому

    This is the first time I've ever seen this theory. I guess it's better than the ramp theory.

  • @ivanhardman4576
    @ivanhardman4576 Рік тому +1

    Accepting that the pyramid was an energy source I think that whatever was in the Sarcophagus had the agility to force water up and down in the King and Queen Shrafts' rapidly creating a Kinetic Energy that would be stored in the saturated granite.

  • @johnvest2710
    @johnvest2710 2 роки тому +50

    How do the leaks in the float chambers get sealed with tons of pressure per square inch ?

  • @brocolymaniac
    @brocolymaniac 5 років тому +77

    How would they open the gates? That's a lot of weight and pressure to overcome. Especially if they want to keep it air tight.

    • @abhilasheddu9024
      @abhilasheddu9024 4 роки тому +2

      Gates can be on the side ways, easy to be pulled by animals. It is possible to make it airtight by taking care of the leakage, where they are pulling it. small leakages will not be a big problem.

    • @Iniquityslasher
      @Iniquityslasher 4 роки тому +8

      This videos sounds good and makes sense. If you don’t have any common knowledge

    • @strangeke7750
      @strangeke7750 4 роки тому +1

      Jay Biersack seriously tho. No one knows and this shit makes sense. People think they know everything.

    • @Lv1Crook
      @Lv1Crook 3 роки тому

      @@Iniquityslasher its just a theory.. I cant believe u so ignorant... If you so smart plz let us know your theory that is more believable...

    • @SuperSimonLewis
      @SuperSimonLewis 2 роки тому

      @@eddie7474 literally crying laughing here

  • @KyleCarrier
    @KyleCarrier Рік тому +2

    You know something a lot of people probably haven't thought about... Did they have sunscreen? Because I'm not sure how many of you know this, but being in water for an extended period of time, the sun reflects off the water and it burns you way quicker than just being in the sun. (Does that sentence make sense? lol) They mentioned in this that the water would be refreshing for them in the hot sun, but they don't realize the fact that you get sunburned easy if you're in the water for a long time. It could even happen in a day... I only know this because when I was a kid I went swimming at our apartment pool literally all day one day, didn't think of sunscreen at all cuz I was like 8, and that night I was so sunburned I got melted to my bed sheets... :0

    • @Grayman58
      @Grayman58 Рік тому +1

      When you grow up in a very hot country your body is a lot more used to the sun and coconut oil is good for the skin

  • @leon6777
    @leon6777 2 роки тому

    Remember, just because YOU couldn't build the pyramids, doesn't mean someone else can't.
    Ingenious yet simple methods made this possible. Egypt had the world's greatest thinkers at the time.

  • @murfleblurg
    @murfleblurg 8 років тому +160

    This is beautifully thought-through and illustrated and would work very nicely if they had access to giant-sized plastic tubing, and the mass of the planet was lowered, to diminish the force of gravity. Water is heavy stuff - the elevator-aqueduct is a lovely idea but trying to contain a column of water in a brick elevator shaft up even a very modest height, never mind the pyramids, would be effectively impossible. The outward pressure on the structure would be huge, and it would be in tension where any masonry structure is all but useless. The pressure on the magically sealed gates would be huge even for a single section and the seal would have to be absolute and airtight, both at the gate and through the stones and mortar - if any part of the shaft breathed even a little there would be constant loss of water. There would be a huge daily loss of water simply to evaporation, and all of the losses would have to be carried up the growing pyramid. It's impossible in oh so many ways but it's a beautiful conception.

    • @Die__Ene
      @Die__Ene 8 років тому +5

      +murfleblurg
      Not to mention the more than likely chance for the floatation attachments to break or be punctioned on both the shaft walls and gates due to the enormous inertia of it's load.
      I don't think that evidence or traces have been found of any large quantities of water nor waterbasins, either.

    • @ddmagee57
      @ddmagee57 8 років тому +2

      Ever seen an aqueduct?

    • @johnlower9094
      @johnlower9094 8 років тому +13

      A cubic foot of water weighs 62 pounds, an eight foot square of it would weigh in at around 4000 pounds. A fifty foot column 200,000 pounds. Even half of that, at 25 feet and 100,000 pounds, would destroy a primitive gate system.

    • @ShadowebEB
      @ShadowebEB 8 років тому +8

      Yes they had primitive tools. The construction of the pyramids is still debated because of what we know of their primitive tools.
      8 meters of water is 50000kg, that means every single 8 meters! Not the full height, but the pressure on each and every gates.
      Now if your gates is made of wood, it needs to be huge to not crack under that pressure, and bigger it is harder it is to move it.
      The video just shows an innovative idea, but it never happened like that.

    • @handendaer
      @handendaer 8 років тому +1

      +murfleblurg lies are never "beautiful". you bloody moron

  • @tubular618
    @tubular618 7 років тому +433

    I think this is the secret. The skeptics are in de Nile.

  • @misaelrios6703
    @misaelrios6703 2 роки тому

    What i like most,is the teddy bear sitting by the causeway 18.30 like he's waiting for pharaoh, sailing to his beloved nile.🙂

  • @vanshir956
    @vanshir956 2 роки тому +2

    I like how they always ignore the 70 ton blocks lol. They would have needed a massive "water lift" and giant buoyancy objects to even move those things and to suggest that those blocks where lifted by such constructions is ridiculous.

  • @100markyman
    @100markyman 5 років тому +72

    ‘A detailed step by step guide’
    You misspelled *guess

  • @MsSomeonenew
    @MsSomeonenew 7 років тому +558

    I do love how people will find aliens as a plausible solution, but waterways... that is just plain crazy!

    • @roland20002000
      @roland20002000 7 років тому +5

      MsSomeonenew Theres a lot of but hurt people. This man has clearly solved the worlds greatest mystery.

    • @DoomFinger511
      @DoomFinger511 7 років тому +70

      There is a hieroglyphic showing how they built these objects. It showed a statue on a sled with many people pulling it with a rope and another person pouring water on the sand in front of the sled. They tested it out and it worked. Most likely you aren't going to find a detailed hieroglyph of how to build the pyramids because it has either deteriorated or it was a skill they didn't want advertised everywhere as it was limited to kings. It was probably on long gone scrolls or tablets.
      If 10000 years from now people invent anti-gravity fields and the engineering knowledge of mechanical cranes are long gone there will be people saying "there's no way they built those sky skyscapers without the help of aliens because anti-gravity fields weren't invented yet!"
      Just because we don't know the details doesn't mean it's impossible. People are too quick to underestimate then ingenuity of human beings and also rely to much on what "facts" we know about history.

    • @DoomFinger511
      @DoomFinger511 7 років тому +50

      Also you're "Orion's Belt" correlation was proven false. In the original book by Bauval and Gilbert called "The Orion Mystery" the map they show of the pyramids was an inverted image. Because in reality the middle pyramid deviates to much north to line up with the belt. But when the image is inverted (so it is now south) then it lines up. Along with the fact that due to planetary precision the positions on Orion's Belt in the sky was in a different area 10,000 years ago. Just like how everyone's astrological sign is actually one ahead of what they think due to the rotation of the earth's axis over the course of 1000's of years.
      Of course no one wants to talk about that because it's not as interesting, so it gets lost as a foot note. Just like Christopher Columbus wasn't the first European in America, the Vikings had been visited here long before him. And people believing that ancient countries were all isolated from each other when in fact they all had trade lines to some degree.
      This is the problem with conspiracy theorists. They believe something, then go and try to find any evidence that justifies their claims while dismissing any that don't. REAL science is just being open minded and willing to accept we just don't know something yet, not just filling in the blanks with "aliens" or "God" and then calling it a day.

    • @roland20002000
      @roland20002000 7 років тому +33

      Kavan Cheff I'm in the construction industry and I can honestly say the system in this video is way more efficient than most of the stuff we have today, assuming there is an abundance of water and little other traffic which is clearly not a privilege you have today. You should be railing in the intelligence, resourcefulness, ingenuity and sophistication of the Egyptians not having a sulk because it's not built by aliens from delta 9.

    • @brunowalker99
      @brunowalker99 7 років тому

      +Kavan Cheff So form what source you get your opinion about Pyramids? I'm not ttrying to debate, I have no idea about this stuff, I'm just curious to understand your point of view, any link that can be trust if you have I would be happy to look at it, with a neutral and unbiased view.

  • @jimmypavone3231
    @jimmypavone3231 Рік тому +2

    Well done, this is most likely hypothesis I’ve ever heard and I’ll check out the book

  • @Dragonsitter
    @Dragonsitter Рік тому

    Interestingly enough there is a theory, quite widely held, that the great pyramid was never a tomb but was a1) a giant “plant” to generate electricity by resonance. The Earth’s resonance was utilised using the water beneath a la Tesla
    2) a giant battery to make electricity roped up by pouring suitable liquids down the shafts. The grand gallery having parts in it to help the process

  • @ramonlopeznote
    @ramonlopeznote 2 роки тому +99

    The causeway was part of the setup for the pharaoh resuscitation so that he could use his boat back into the Nile. The water lift is unimaginable for the culture level of this ancient civilisation, notwithstanding the numerous pictorial and bass-relief evidence left by the Egyptians dragging the blocks with men and ox and not floating them. But I do like the idea.

    • @jaydee3730
      @jaydee3730 2 роки тому +10

      "The water lift is unimaginable for the culture level of this ancient civilisation" Although I agree with your point that there is no pictorial evidence to suggest this method being utilized, I disagree that the Egyptians were incapable of constructing such a lift. They had full knowledge of building water-tight boats which would have just as easily been applied to stonework. And they were capable of building a structure as massive as the Great Pyramid with 20+ ton blocks of stone in such a way that a credit card (and in some places, a sheet of paper) cannot be inserted into the gaps. So this engineering feat was not out of their range of building. Actually, the water building method would explain the tightness of the stones a lot better than if you expect me to believe they were manually moved that close together. It is a very interesting concept, to say the least...

    • @heartthrobstudio4459
      @heartthrobstudio4459 2 роки тому +1

      G get cu and a Ustinov .my BB u you to

    • @zerofox7347
      @zerofox7347 Рік тому +4

      You just made that up! There are no pictures of them building pyramids that’s the problem we’re left with. Secondly they were evidently highly skilled builders and experts with irrigation.

    • @karaDee2363
      @karaDee2363 Рік тому +4

      Only unimaginable for the person that has no imagination

    • @essdotw.1427
      @essdotw.1427 Рік тому +1

      No no no.... they used Liebherr and Hyundai cranes ....I rented them the cranes when I worked at Sunbelt many years ago.....it was my summer job.

  • @CoolGuy-fg3xv
    @CoolGuy-fg3xv 4 роки тому +191

    You can’t solve a mystery with another mystery

    • @jonathanallard2128
      @jonathanallard2128 4 роки тому +9

      A plausible solution is better than nothing.

    • @jonathanallard2128
      @jonathanallard2128 4 роки тому +10

      @lol bad kid Wtf do you know about it? Did you not see the explanations and scale models?
      Explain how it's not plausible without resorting to your own personal incredulity.

    • @marcusavey8529
      @marcusavey8529 4 роки тому +27

      he claims the pyramids are from 4,500 b.c., which is false, weathering and further excavation of the sphynx puts it roughtly at 30,000 bc, as it can clearly be seen by archeologists the numerous stages of erosion,
      furthermore, using a water based walkway seems feasible, but that only makes sense for the 6 pyramids around giza, what about the 20 or so other pyramids scattered across egypt? they werent built next to the nile, and there isnt evidence of aquaducts sprawling across the entire country, which the egyptians didnt even invent, the romans did, and is recorded as a technological marvel, but apparently the egyptians invented it first?
      then the claim of each 2 ton block is hand carved? bullshit, each block is precise, you cant even squeeze a bank card through the gaps, and each block is practically perfect, you simply could not acheive this with handheld tools, least of all copper ones, least of all for over 2 million individual blocks, all hand carved and perfect? sorry but you'd have to be an idiot to buy that, why? because how are they getting perfect moulds? thats a catch 22, "the egyptians were able to make perfect casts of stone blocks, by making these perfect moulds" it doesnt explain anything and just adds a rabbit hole thesis
      as for the comparison of how boats float vs how these stones are supposedly floating, well if you know anything about buoyancy then you would understand that it recquires alot more than just strapping a load of air filled containers onto an object to make it float, boats float due to their shape and material, the underneath of a boat is arched in a very specific way, the stone blocks are not curved, thus the laws of buonancy falls short, due to a lack of structrural support, if you've ever done team building exercises at the seeside, then you'll know that strapping a bunch of plastic drums to some shit doesnt make for a very good raft, it'll kinda work but you'll keep submerging briefly, now change a few people for a 2 ton stone block and you have a better insight, as its depicted that the stone blocks have a flat bottom in this video, meaning they simply wouldnt be buoyant at all, and only the floats support the structure, but air alone isnt going to counter the forces tht are pulling that stone down as thats only what could happen given the video's diagrams, air vs gravity on a ton block, theres alot more in physics to help something float that ive already expressed,
      i would go more and more into detail but its rather boring to comment on a load of bollocks
      edit, said 200 ton block instead of 2 ton block, typo's happen

    • @jonathanallard2128
      @jonathanallard2128 4 роки тому +11

      @@marcusavey8529 1: ''weathering and further excavation of the sphynx puts it roughtly at 30,000 bc''
      Sources for that?
      2: ''and there isnt evidence of aquaducts sprawling across the entire country, which the egyptians didnt even invent, the romans did, and is recorded as a technological marvel, but apparently the egyptians invented it first?''
      Woah, easy there with the aqueducts! There's a big difference between an aqueduct and a small canal! Aqueducts span from mountain tops over miles and miles, over any terrain, and is elevated. Aqueducts are A LOT HARDER to build than a simple causeway that doesn't start up in mountains, isn't very long and is not elevated. Please don't pretend like they're the same challenge.
      3a: ''what about the 20 or so other pyramids scattered across egypt? they werent built next to the nile''
      I don't know you're talking about. Link to one, or name one? Sources?
      3b: ''"then the claim of each 2 ton block is hand carved? bullshit''
      Your own personal incredulity. Of course you can do perfect blocks by hand. Of course the Egyptians had protractors. And the video explains how they could use the water as a level too.
      ''because how are they getting perfect moulds''
      Yeah they had protractors. It's actually very simple.
      4: ''as for the comparison of how boats float vs how these stones are supposedly floating, well if you know anything about buoyancy then you would understand that it recquires alot more than just strapping a load of air filled containers onto an object to make it float''
      Baby floaters? WTF seriously? How can you even say something so demonstrably wrong?
      ''the underneath of a boat is arched in a very specific way,''
      1: There is more than one way to make something float so even though the thing looks nothing like a boat, that doesn't mean it doesn't float just because of that.
      2: The angles of a boat hull isn't even for floating! These angles serve as hydrodynamics + stabilizers so that the boat stays upright and can go forward without too much drag.
      You're all wrong on this boat thing.
      None of your objections hold any water. ;)

    • @alexandresobreiramartins9461
      @alexandresobreiramartins9461 4 роки тому +3

      @@jonathanallard2128 There's no arguing against ignorance who wants to remain ignorant.

  • @csamere2281
    @csamere2281 10 місяців тому

    The blocks where baked. They discovered a better way of concocting concrete than what we currently have in present day. They mixed all the different material together and poured each block followed by baking it, then they used a device to cool it down by blowing into it.

    • @ge2623
      @ge2623 6 місяців тому

      That explains the candles they found at the top.

  • @sanfranciscobay
    @sanfranciscobay Рік тому

    How does this theory of water lifting shafts fit in with John Pierre Houdins Internal Ramp theory? Were they both used at the same time, same location?

  • @trond3trond
    @trond3trond 9 років тому +35

    Well,there are theories out there that are more batshit crazy than this one.

    • @DarthAwar
      @DarthAwar 9 років тому +5

      Trond Tangen Agreed just read above half the people here reckon Aliens or Atlantis built them!

    • @laughingachilles
      @laughingachilles 9 років тому +21

      Trond Tangen This one isn't even crazy, it is based on very reasonable principles, using the available materials of the time. I have to say the first time I heard this I found it instantly more sensible than the idea of building massive ramps or other such structures.

    • @Dawid-kn6mv
      @Dawid-kn6mv 3 роки тому +1

      @@laughingachilles This one is simply stupid. Go and build functional water elevator alone with ancient technology.

    • @laughingachilles
      @laughingachilles 3 роки тому

      @Dawid
      Alone? I think I would need quite a few people and the spare time of course.
      It's really not that stupid as all one needs is a sealed shaft and they had clay and other waterproof and viscous materials which would be suitable for that.
      Then you need some sort of float device, inflated goats bladders or skins would be suitable and as these have been used by many peoples for transporting water it hardly seems likely the Egyptians didn't see that possible use for them.
      Remember how ingenious these people were. They built canals up to the pyramid in order to pull barges carrying the quarried stone close to the pyramid rather than pulling it along on sand. Of course the final part was pulled on sand but even then they wet the sand to make pulling the sleds easier.
      I wouldn't dismiss the idea out of hand just because they were an ancient people. They were smart and dedicated, this can achieve a lot even with technology we today would consider primitive.

  • @ChrisCoombes
    @ChrisCoombes 4 роки тому +80

    It would help to have a life size demonstration of floating one of the blocks.

    • @davidgreen5994
      @davidgreen5994 4 роки тому

      +Chris Coombes It would cost a lot to do it unless the world governments don't make a common effort is not really possible.

    • @nickcornelius9076
      @nickcornelius9076 4 роки тому +7

      See 5:51 lol

    • @ChrisCoombes
      @ChrisCoombes 4 роки тому +1

      Nick Cornelius yes!!

    • @jonathanallard2128
      @jonathanallard2128 4 роки тому +3

      @Think4yourself ForOnce You're comparing the floating element of the 1st (Hulled ship) with the cargo of the second (piece of stone). lol That's where your mistake is. A more honest comparison would be: ''A Hulled ship vs floating materials'' or ''a fuckton of cargo vs a solid piece of stone''. As you see, when put this way, you can start understanding why the analogy with the ship works...

    • @jonathanallard2128
      @jonathanallard2128 4 роки тому +1

      @Think4yourself ForOnce Let me try again.
      Hulled ship (floating mechanism) + a fuckton of cargo (cargo) = cargo ship. cargo ships float.
      Floating materials as explained in the video (floating mechanism) + a solid piece of stone (cargo) = also floats.
      You comparing the hulled ship (floating mechanism) of the first object, with the solid piece of stone (the cargo) of the second, was a dishonest analogy, if your point is that therefore the second can't float.
      You see it now? ;)

  • @johnwest5239
    @johnwest5239 Рік тому +1

    I would love to see a actual full scale experiment not talking about building a entire Pyramid but lifting even a 1 ton block and stacking em

  • @Mark-om3cl
    @Mark-om3cl Рік тому +1

    Is the water level when shaping limestone topped constantly. Cuz every time the guys get out of the water they will be removing around a litre of water with the wet hair and clothing so over a period of time the water level will drop causing later blocks not being carved to same dimensions as previous ones.

  • @blackdogleg
    @blackdogleg 10 років тому +6

    the fact that every time the stone is struck while under water slashes and waves are produced, not even considering the movements of the workers by it´s self throws this ides into the dump. amazing all the effort that went into this production but zero thought.

  • @theweirdshow2860
    @theweirdshow2860 3 роки тому +67

    I love watching people explain how the pyrimids were built even though we have literally no idea how it was made.

    • @debbiejudd4933
      @debbiejudd4933 2 роки тому

      Watch the movie the pyramid

    • @mokiloke
      @mokiloke Рік тому

      Best explanation is this one, ticks all the boxes of plausibility - no magic required - ua-cam.com/video/j4cdDT1ZvAA/v-deo.html

    • @Ezra510h
      @Ezra510h Рік тому

      I have actual pictures of how the pyramids was made, its mind blowing. ***Not built by SLAVES*** ... Currently looking for historians to analyze it... We got it wrong all this time...Please Refer me to someone I can present it to.

  • @Alex-sm1mb
    @Alex-sm1mb 11 місяців тому

    I would like to see people accept that potentially they built this using many different techniques and improved throughout the process. They could’ve also used the “hydraulic ram water pump” as well as “geopolymer molded rocks”. As to why it was built that would be a different chapter.

  • @MichaelMooney-ci4cc
    @MichaelMooney-ci4cc 18 днів тому

    Great video...hard to iynderstand the physics of this .and the genius who organized it...maybe Job? Awesome Theory.

  • @banido
    @banido 9 років тому +482

    You silly people, everyone knows the Goa'uld built them.

    • @ljfsdlfksjg
      @ljfsdlfksjg 9 років тому +5

      Yes!

    • @guillaumebourdon7112
      @guillaumebourdon7112 9 років тому +20

      banido Shel kek nem ron!

    • @Magerquark
      @Magerquark 9 років тому

      banido I love you

    • @DanieleTrapani
      @DanieleTrapani 9 років тому +16

      banido tal mek. creon te shree. tal mek

    • @Pluxars
      @Pluxars 9 років тому +20

      banido Damnit now I have to go rewatch all the stargate series, see you in a few months.

  • @peterblood50
    @peterblood50 2 роки тому +54

    This theory was worth 8 million views. I doubt the Pyramids were built this way, but I think his bank account was. Kudos

  • @hw2758
    @hw2758 7 місяців тому +2

    I think the real conspiracy theory is that with our modern technology we somehow can’t figure out how they built the pyramids.
    When you factor in how half of modern-day Egypt’s economy is dependent on tourism, it creates an incentive to preserve the mystique of ancient Egypt.
    The biggest reason I visited Egypt with my family was because of this idea of adventure or discovery beyond what I fully understand. Everyone successful tied to the tourism industry was extremely quick witted and knew what tourists were drawn to get them to spend their money.
    The reality is modern-day Egypt is a struggling nation that is trying to milk the mysteries of the past empires to get rich tourists to boost their current economy. Which is why, even if we solve these “mysteries”, there is no way the (somewhat shady/ self-serving) Egyptian government would ever reveal these truths to protect their tourism industry. I don’t think this is a bad thing. I actually loved the experience of visiting Egypt and feeling like a kid again, where there is so much you don’t know.

  • @jordanshilander7402
    @jordanshilander7402 4 місяці тому

    In order to maintain a water level at atmospheric pressure at the top of the pyramid, the water pressure at the base of the pyramid would be about 194psi. Assuming the gates at the bottom were about 6' square, there would be over 1 million pounds of force pushing against the entire gate just to hold the water in.

  • @eduardoaguirre155
    @eduardoaguirre155 4 роки тому +41

    man, this theory makes sense to me. He is right, there is no evidence of a ramp being used. A water system like this could be broken down and you wouldn't need that large work force to create a ramp and use rollers to drag the stones up the pyramid. you could focus your workers on the quarry shaping the stones. Very interesting theory, im impressed.

    • @sunpallinkarvat
      @sunpallinkarvat 4 роки тому +7

      There is evidence of ramp being used: an internal ramp. This floating theory is even stupider than theories about aliens building the pyramids.

    • @DrAGGill
      @DrAGGill 4 роки тому +4

      @@sunpallinkarvat Ramp systems would all take far more time to construct and move blocks, whereas this system simplifies the movement completely. It actually makes a lot more sense than any of the other theories I have seen. Additionally, it will guarantee that the pyramid stays level for every single level being added on. My only issue is building the covered causeways so that they are airtight, or very near airtight, to minimize leakage and allow the buoyancy movement to happen.

    • @sunpallinkarvat
      @sunpallinkarvat 4 роки тому +3

      ​@@DrAGGill Internal ramp does not take any more time to construct. It fact it decreases the building time because you can leave empty space inside the pyramid.
      The Egyptians did not have water pumps. Thus this floating theory is absolutely bullshit.

    • @ionelhantulie4368
      @ionelhantulie4368 4 роки тому +4

      @@sunpallinkarvat The secrets of building the Great Pyramid of Egypt. On a 26.5° inclined "main inner mobile ramp" located in the "central channel" of the Great Gallery, about 150 workers with the help of a system of traction levers of order 2 with a height of 5 m in which the active force arm "F1 of workers" is b1 = 5 m . The arm of the resistant force "F2 = Gt (tangential component of the weight of the stone block) + Ff (the frictional force given by the weight of the stone block on the sled") is b2 = 1 m. The arm of the resistant force "F2 = Gt ( tangential component of the weight of the stone block) + Ff (friction force given by the weight of the stone block on the sled") is b2 = 1 m, can pull closer and closer on the "main inner mobile ramp" inclined at 26.5° [~ 1,24 m. (distance traveled by b2) X 70 elevations = 87 m. (40 m. length of ascending passage + 47 m. length of the Great Gallery)] a stone block of 60 tons in an "elementary" simple and easy way up to a height of 43 m. for the construction of the King's Chamber. In this case on the " main inner mobile ramp " the lever of order 2 serves to multiply by 5 times the workers traction active force of F1. You can find drawings and explanations on page 32 ~ 43 on the website www.thegreatpyramidofegypt.com in English or Romanian (no money).
      Leave a comment if you can!
      Have a nice day.
      Thanks.

    • @johnwalker1553
      @johnwalker1553 4 роки тому

      @@sunpallinkarvat and how did the material hold together. or was not drown, during rainfall? you need a tub and drainage, heavy compaction vibrators. this tub seen for yourself, would be another world heritage.

  • @crabbyappleseed8190
    @crabbyappleseed8190 3 роки тому +23

    The causeways have a slope of 8.5 degrees. That doesn't seem enough to be effective
    to float stones. Keeping the volume of water needed for this system to stay full
    would also be a daunting task

    • @LegoSwordViedos
      @LegoSwordViedos 2 роки тому +1

      More dawnting than assuming you use MILLIONS of people to drag it. let me ask you this, yo I got a job offer you and some guys can drag a multiton block miles in the hot sun and make a GIGANTIC ram made of MILLIONS of tones of dirt and sand, or. move this floating block along and pass a bucket, while you get to stand in cool water and shade all daw working? And early understanding of water was some of the first science humans were begining to understand. it's also possible the smaller pyramids were done getting the basic concept down and then they just scaled it up bigger and bigger.

    • @jeffthevomitguy1178
      @jeffthevomitguy1178 2 роки тому

      @@LegoSwordViedos he meant it was more daunting for the architect.

    • @mokiloke
      @mokiloke Рік тому +1

      @@LegoSwordViedos With the water method you need to carry the same weight of water as stone to the top to keep the pipe full, as far as i can tell as a water engineer. and they had no pump so it would have to be carried up in bladders, also to fill all the leaks. Also the pressure down the bottom is too much

  • @plankark
    @plankark 11 місяців тому

    Very interesting! At the very least te concept of using water for a foundational 'level' is practical & plausible.

  • @mhaze210
    @mhaze210 2 роки тому

    Did the workers take turns working in the water so they could cool off?

  • @billa4512
    @billa4512 3 роки тому +253

    This video should shown in schools with title " How exactly the Pyramids cannot to be built ".

    • @edkennedy7952
      @edkennedy7952 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly.

    • @darrenedwards6538
      @darrenedwards6538 3 роки тому +3

      @Jaxi don’t tell me schools use grammar!!! I don’t fink so!!

    • @eggieo6659
      @eggieo6659 3 роки тому +1

      It was shown in my school and presented as fact.

    • @aliaoun4532
      @aliaoun4532 3 роки тому +1

      🤣😂

    • @Princip666
      @Princip666 3 роки тому +2

      @@eggieo6659 Seriously? It's like showing Tom&Jerry cartoon as factual :D

  • @summertea545
    @summertea545 3 роки тому +30

    I'd be convinced seeing this actually done the way this video claims then I would believe it.

    • @sandysandip4428
      @sandysandip4428 3 роки тому +3

      Xnxx

    • @desertsand4797
      @desertsand4797 3 роки тому +3

      Great comment, everytime I hear a new theory about how they were built, that they were power generators, or anything else, I've never seen anyone make even a 1/4 scale model to show their theory is viable

  • @yourlocalidiotlol8690
    @yourlocalidiotlol8690 Рік тому +1

    I like how the bricks just fall from the sky perfectly in place😊

    • @Pauly421
      @Pauly421 Рік тому

      😂 Ancient egyptian levetation spell!

  • @GeoffreyBlee-de9ns
    @GeoffreyBlee-de9ns Рік тому

    This has to be the first reasonable explanation. Thank you.

  • @C99631
    @C99631 6 років тому +274

    So the most literate, obsessive record keepers of their time, didn't leave a single document describing this method of building. Oooookay.

    • @JJones-oi3jc
      @JJones-oi3jc 6 років тому +20

      M C i personally think they did but it was either destroyed or accidentally ruined or maybe its still hanging around somewhere

    • @jmbwithcats
      @jmbwithcats 6 років тому +2

      Ephemera is always the first to vanish from history...

    • @jakehubbs1304
      @jakehubbs1304 6 років тому +11

      They didn't leave any documentation though so what's your point?

    • @matiasdelapantera9739
      @matiasdelapantera9739 6 років тому +38

      Yes, the most literate, obsessive record keepers of their time, didn't leave a single document describing this method of building.
      This information has been lost to time as has happened countless times with other technologies. We're barely scratching the surface of how they were able to build these pyramids.
      Edit: Look up what happened at the Library of Alexandria, there was lots of knowledge there.

    • @cncfann23
      @cncfann23 5 років тому +25

      Ever heard of the library of Alexandria?

  • @TheNinerion
    @TheNinerion 9 років тому +110

    this hypothesis seems unlikely. The most obvious problem I can think of right now: how do you work stone underwater? Try swinging a hammer underwater. Try seeing anything in dirty water (and this water would have been dirty). So basically these people would have had to be precise and efficient while standing in chest high water and not able to see what they were doing?

    • @PINGPONGROCKSBRAH
      @PINGPONGROCKSBRAH 9 років тому +21

      TheNinerion Didn't he say that they only worked the top surface of the stone by making it level with the water? I would worry more about waves making it hard to tell where the water level was than about the water being too dirty to see.
      EDIT: I would also worry about the inevitable blooms of algae and the huge amount of evaporation that would take place in the desert.

    • @supermegablurgh
      @supermegablurgh 9 років тому +4

      TheNinerion they chiseled and shaped the stone above water/ in shallow water. It was mostly just used for transporting them afterwards

    • @metalwilla
      @metalwilla 9 років тому

      TheNinerion They could have people skimming the water. the stone would be more soft in the water.

    • @Jacno77
      @Jacno77 9 років тому

      TheNinerion they prob worked in a gentle running stream. Anything dirty would just be pushed out

    • @TheNinerion
      @TheNinerion 9 років тому +1

      Jacno77 ok, that opens up the question: "where did the gentle running stream come from?" these pyramids are on a plateau in the desert next to the nile... how?!
      The water hypothesis is cool and maybe even workable and efficient, but is there any evidence for this actually happening? It seems rather unsupported.

  • @kommodorez24
    @kommodorez24 Рік тому

    I really like this theory, even if the pyramids were not built this way, it's a very cleaver way to elevate objets from one level to another using buoyancy. Thumbs up!

    • @plankark
      @plankark 11 місяців тому

      And to establish a 'level' for the base.

  • @CYON4D
    @CYON4D 2 роки тому +1

    I would say the pressure in the stone tubes would be extremely high and would explode as the height increases.

  • @tcironbear21
    @tcironbear21 9 років тому +44

    Really good theory.My big question is how did the make a good enough seal on the gates? Those gates would have to water tight or nearly water tight in order to work.
    Now I know humans have been able to make water tight objects for millenia. But I can't think of any objects that can be contained water tight movable parts before the 1800s. Humans pulled it off with a combination of percise, strong, and form fitting components, special lubricants, and rubber.

    • @ticketmachine
      @ticketmachine 9 років тому +12

      TC Coltharp Given the spring, they wouldn't need to be water tight. They just need to reduce the flow significantly

    • @Luciferian.Latino
      @Luciferian.Latino 9 років тому +3

      TC Coltharp
      They didn't have to use anything special for a sealant. Humans have been dry distilling wood since time immemorial. What does wood distillation get you? Charcoal and TAR. Wood pitch was a great sealant and used all the way through the 1400s in wooden boats. Tar in it's more liquid form (wood pitch is tar, just less fluid) makes for a relatively easy to manipulate, hydrophobic layer of resin for just about ay application.

    • @tcironbear21
      @tcironbear21 9 років тому +1

      ***** Well the thing is that given the pressures we are looking at, even an opening of a single square centimeter in total could quickly outpace a bucket brigade. Also I doubt the spring was all that strong of a current. A spring will quickly erode itself down to low level of pressure. It probably only saved them some work, not power the whole thing.

    • @Zaysaki
      @Zaysaki 9 років тому +2

      TC Coltharp multiple gates = less water preassure per gate. like the guy said in the video. that and the fact that they wouldnt have to be completely water tight

    • @tcironbear21
      @tcironbear21 9 років тому +2

      Zamis Gama Like I said, I am quite aware of humans making water tight objects since antiquity. But these objects lacked moving components.If you just create a gate out wood and pitch, water either leak around the edges of the gate at rapid rate or it would stick in place all the time.If you are still having trouble envisioning it, imagine a bottle with cork in it. The cork can make a great reusable seal because it can be compressed and then rebound. To create the gates like they imagine you need a solid that can be compressed and rebound. The rebounding pressure is what makes the water tight seal. Most Solids and liquids can not be compressed and rebound. If you hit them pressure they tend deform or bond instead. Cork & rubber can do this easily. But most lumber won't rebound from compression. So every time you open and close the gate, it will leak more and more. And tar will tend to bond when compressed. So for this to work, the ancients needed a material that would rebound from compression and would not bond when compressed.If you can track down one such material that the ancient Egyptians had access to and I will consider this theory viable.

  • @webwolf4you
    @webwolf4you 3 роки тому +110

    They show this glass tube as scale model to demonstrate how a stone (with swimmer ontop) can float upwards. This is working because they have an absolutely air-tight and water-tight tube to have the vacuum holding the water. But I wonder how you could build this from stone, several meters high. Making sure it's air-tight until the top. With movable gates which need to be sealed air-tight again! In a scale where those heavy stones can freely float inside. And sturdy enough not to scatter when the floating blocks bang against the walls.
    And a second thought: Say, all this is working. Then: How would you press the blocks (with floaters) under water so it can enter the tube's entrance? You would need to apply pressure of several tons AGAINST the floaters, right? And then move it carefully under water until it is inside the tube, then release it carefully so it doesn't bang with 80 toons lifting force against the walls...

    • @mr.j5919
      @mr.j5919 3 роки тому +8

      You could you could easily take away floats to a precise amount then put any amount of weight on to top sink but there’s a lot more that’s wrong with this idea

    • @warrenjacobus9620
      @warrenjacobus9620 3 роки тому +1

      yeah... this guy didnt think about that.

    • @rarodriguez
      @rarodriguez 3 роки тому +6

      well said. there is no vacuum on the top to "lift the water" to a higher level... I've never seen my straw hold liquid at a higher level then what my cup has. Well said Wolfram!

    • @stephenfaulkner1448
      @stephenfaulkner1448 3 роки тому +5

      He explains how..Clay and amimal fat lining inside of a tube built from block.

    • @stephenfaulkner1448
      @stephenfaulkner1448 3 роки тому +9

      @@rarodriguez I think Thats the job of the two gates.. Vacuum dont hold the water up in the tube.. The gates hold the water up in the tube when they fill it.. at all times you will have one gate closed. thats why they are two.

  • @dupco
    @dupco Рік тому

    Investigations of the stones have long since shown that chemical reactions took place very quickly when the lime was bound. Such reactions do not occur with natural stone, but only with poured concrete.

  • @markmiller6402
    @markmiller6402 2 роки тому +1

    Would this system work to raise the many granite blocks?

  • @dma654
    @dma654 4 роки тому +20

    Very clever, I have never heard of this theory. I'd much rather float giant stones that weigh a ton than drag them.

    • @pvb9964
      @pvb9964 4 роки тому +3

      sure, 2.5 million blocks cut with 120 million copper chisels and wooden mallets, blocks floated by 100 animal bladders each and miles of hemp ropes, which stretch when wet, per block, inflated by ????.Give me a break.

    • @zarni000
      @zarni000 4 роки тому +5

      too bad they try to solve an engineering marvel with another engineering marvel that was impossible to construct.
      maybe next they will explain how the egyptians built water tight gates and channels with stoneage technology.

  • @nikkoracela
    @nikkoracela 3 роки тому +241

    I’m one step closer to figuring out how the Pyramid was built because I just eliminated this technique.

    • @ChrisWashburn
      @ChrisWashburn 3 роки тому +19

      Best fuckin comment i've read on here by far 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @huguesh294
      @huguesh294 3 роки тому +2

      HAHAHA xD

    • @blackbirdxx928
      @blackbirdxx928 3 роки тому +1

      LOL....you too

    • @mugen-mundo
      @mugen-mundo 3 роки тому +13

      This theory answers more questions then other theories that only solve portions of the build. Also becomes very interesting when you learn that part of egypt had a massive flooding issue. To the point were the first pharaoh of lower and upper egypt had to construct a massive retention wall to keep the city from flooding annually. So there was lot of water around and lots of knowledge and engineering regarding bodies of water. In any case its still a mystery to mankind.

    • @drusky4life
      @drusky4life 3 роки тому +9

      So in your opinion its more likely hundreds of thousands of people dragged the stones up hill to worksite eh.

  • @rachelthurman4845
    @rachelthurman4845 2 роки тому

    So interesting.. pyramids are such a mystery , and this answers a few of my questions.. they are the most wondrous man made structures on this earth.

  • @CaugustusWhite
    @CaugustusWhite 2 роки тому +1

    So guys thrashing around chiseling blocks in water is what you think they used to get those services within a 1/32nd of an inch over smoothness tolerance across a 6 feet surface?