Trio for piano, violin and cello Op. 110 (1851), Robert Schumann (1810-1856). The Munich Dvorak Trio Gitti Pirner, piano Janos Maté, violin Franz Amann, cello I. Bewegt, doch nicht zu rasch (00:00) II. Ziemlich langsam / Etwas bewegter / Erstes Tempo (7:13) III. Rasch / Etwas Zuruckhaltend bis zum langsameren Tempo / Erstes Tempo (13:21) IV. Kräftig, mit Humor (17:03)
This trio was for long considrerd as inferior to the first ones because it dated from the latest period of Schumann, when his capacities were said to deiminish due to his mental moments of illness. A common criticism was the concentration of the sonority in the medium range. I consider that this is a peculiar fetaure of that period, but it is not a weakness in itself. This trio is equal to the first ones. It is darker: each msterwork has features of its own.
Does it really matter if how much of the instrument's range is used? Not to us, but apparently some snobs insist on having flamboyance for a work to be acceptable to them.
Nah, this trio is uninspired and tasteless. It's a piece that says nothing. Schumann's first trio was a little bit better, yes, but the other two are uninspired pieces of garbage. I love'em though, like I love everything Schumann has written (except that violin concerto).
@@metodoinstinto of course, listening to the sirens for too long affects one's musical perception. And then one sees, and hears, the wheel spinning, spinning...
Sublime, what a wonderful world we live in, thank you!
Yes.
@TimondeNood -- That is So Great! and that it doesn't take much please you......BRAVO from Acapulco!
For me this is THE most difficult piano trio ever written... Absolutely stunning performance here!
oh man, you again! :D
@Jeffrey Why is so difficult? For me, this ist the most beautiful trio. I want play this:) I am pianist, now i am working on Dumky (Dvorak).
You are right. The peculiar intrication of the string instruments and the piano in the medium range is touchy.
I am afraid that you will meet expression problemns rather than technical problems.
Jeffrey Chan why didn't you mention Ravel's or Shostakovich's 2nd Piano Trio?
Trio for piano, violin and cello Op. 110 (1851), Robert Schumann (1810-1856).
The Munich Dvorak Trio
Gitti Pirner, piano
Janos Maté, violin
Franz Amann, cello
I. Bewegt, doch nicht zu rasch (00:00)
II. Ziemlich langsam / Etwas bewegter / Erstes Tempo (7:13)
III. Rasch / Etwas Zuruckhaltend bis zum langsameren Tempo / Erstes Tempo (13:21)
IV. Kräftig, mit Humor (17:03)
Im discovering schumann at 38. I have to say i really like his music a lot
You should listen to the works of Clara Schumann, his wife and an incredible composer herself. They wrote in a similar style.
That comment makes no sense.
Hurbii ya that's true, like Hummel and Czerny for example, or Dvorak in Bb Major
@@mcrettable more important like who for example?
@Barnacle Boy One that has been deleted.
Bravo maestro
exquisite work.....wonderful work....thank u so much Paco m
Прекрасная Музыка отлично исполненная! Браво!
When you listen to Schumann's chamber music everything else seems so dry and boring. He was the embodiment of romanticism.period.
Marvelous performance! Just incredible.
It's like the last movement is a giant coda, but one that never wants to end
Thanks for uploading!
This trio was for long considrerd as inferior to the first ones because it dated from the latest period of Schumann, when his capacities were said to deiminish due to his mental moments of illness. A common criticism was the concentration of the sonority in the medium range. I consider that this is a peculiar fetaure of that period, but it is not a weakness in itself. This trio is equal to the first ones. It is darker: each msterwork has features of its own.
Does it really matter if how much of the instrument's range is used? Not to us, but apparently some snobs insist on having flamboyance for a work to be acceptable to them.
Well it can be an indicator of unidiomatic writing, although I think Schumann pulled it off very well here.
Nah, this trio is uninspired and tasteless. It's a piece that says nothing. Schumann's first trio was a little bit better, yes, but the other two are uninspired pieces of garbage. I love'em though, like I love everything Schumann has written (except that violin concerto).
Another idiotic comment the likes of which could only come from you.
@@metodoinstinto of course, listening to the sirens for too long affects one's musical perception. And then one sees, and hears, the wheel spinning, spinning...
1 00:00
2 07:15
3 13:25
4 17:05
The first, yearning, theme of the first movement reminds me strongly of the corresponding theme of the first Violin sonata.
13:24: 4th Symphony?
As you noted i also feel it's similar to the "Clara motif" in his 4th symphony.
Why'd they only do the exposition once the first time through? They jumped right to the second ending.
The performers are usually frightened by this sort of pieces )
7:15 good
슈만의 대위법적인 텍스쳐도 놀랍다. 악기간의 선율도 자유롭게 잘 분리한다.😕
Sans la reprise du 1er mouvement...
Exactly. Why did they do that?
@@cennamowoodwinds no time? :D
0:58; 5:00
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2 7:13
Unlike the 1st Trio, the 2nd and 3rd are good all the way through.
Что там с первым?