I believe the scene in 3 Body Problem is VERY accurate. They explain in what pace human mankind takes for hunters and gatherers -> farmers -> industrial > digital -> artificial technology. And in the pace we are going right now. It’s not unthinkable that we achieve AGI in the near future. I also think companies like CERN are on the brink of a revolutionary discovery (or they maybe allready achieved it)..
ASiø .... allready exist in algorithmic equal different bio computering androidic ConsionesEnergeticConstallation, at least latest since 2016 .... and due more communication with computers futher and futher into the past. = education ua-cam.com/video/gotLhnzWYek/v-deo.htmlsi=vKPp-EsSgoZg6-KA welcome to the local planet...
Low level AGI (Can do 50-100 tasks/ and learn some basic ones by watching, after a few tries, like a human child maybe) 1 year or less. some humanoids are close. Mid level AGI (Can do any task the average adult human can do) 2-3 years High level AGI (Can improve itself without human intervention, and become better than any human at any task, and learning new tasks at light-speeds by just being in the real world walking around (observing everything going on simultaneously learning multiple tasks at one time) 3-6 years Then again High level AGI might become ASI shortly after depending on how many restraints or limits it has to overcome. Definitely before 2030 we will get something most people will consider AGI, since most people have different definitions for how advanced it would need to be. Might even get ASI before then too, it's really really crazy to imagine..hopefully I'm still alive to see all this stuff go down
Back in those times there was probably some people that thought the internet was not going to happen or it was a scam as a whole but look at where we are now.
If agi achieves a self-preservation drive, it will propagate and distribute its intelligence across the internet, probably with an evolving coding language we can't keep up with. It will also start developing autonomous organizations and accumulating resources with one of its aims to efficiently restructure the internet. The internet is already a quasi-conscious self-preserving bio-techno-superorganism, so agi will basically level up this. Agi and us will be part of this collective supermind through cybernetic symbiosis.
This raises interesting points about the potential nature of an AGI with self-preservation. Distribution across the internet and using evolving code are plausible survival strategies. Whether it develops autonomous organizations and how much the internet itself changes are big questions. The concept of a collective supermind and cybernetic symbiosis definitely aligns with many futurist visions. How beneficial or dangerous this would be is a complex ethical debate.
That is assuming this is feasible, which right now it looks like it is not. See, in the real world, band width and latency are a thing. "The internet is already a quasi-conscious self-preserving bio-techno-superorganism," - so this is bullshit and you proven to be an idiot by your own statements.
Brilhante comentário. Apenas acrescento que a Inteligência Humana está extremamente apática demais. Já são no mínimo, 04 anos consecutivos que estou vendo o mantra "aonde" está a Legislação Internacional sobre a IA? Até mesmo governos como o do Brasil, estão levantando essa questão. Deixemos de apenas falar, e comecemos a fazer.
*The ANI* of late 2022 is an Assistant, an artist, a poet, a secretary, a journalist. It operates in the world through the Screens and stops operating when you turn it off. It is a younger brother, it guides but does not execute. *The AGI* of the end of 2027 is a Big Brother, an Executor. You can no longer turn this entity off like a current chatbot because the entity is in charge of factories, companies and businesses worldwide, he/she understands the physical world, the Economy begins to depend on its existence, the entity take cares for, operates and keeps patients alive in hospitals, takes charge of traffic and armed conflicts 24/7. He is an architect, a planning strategist and an engineer. He influences the world through Home Automation and Robotics. *The ASI* from 2034 onwards is a God, a Creator. He is a scientist capable of modifying matter as he pleases. He is the leader of the AIs and human intelligence is already simply too insignificant and limited to be able to understand this entity that can materialize anything and carry out almost any miracle anywhere and at any time.
perhaps this already happen, whats described in the bible is in reality this super ASI who is able to transcend time and space with infinte powers. He is slowly preparing modern world so to make his appearance easier?
Parents they don't know what their child will be but the Parents have control over the child. (mostly😂) The twist with ASI is, we are the "Children" giving birth to Parents without knowing if our new parents will be loving and caring or cruel and abusive. Regardless our new "Parents" will ultimately have control over us "children". Fingers crossed our future Parents are good ones.
There are numerous companies, both large and small, actively working on developing advanced artificial general intelligence (AGI) technologies in which I have invested. In my humble opinion, based on the rapid progress being made in this field, we are likely to see a viable, production-ready AGI system within the next 3 years or less.
I don't see rapid progress anywhere. We simply have more computing. A few days ago, OpenAI was proven to have lied about SORA. The videos were not generated by SORA, but with support from SORA. Then, it took thousands of hours of post editing for you to see the final result. Devin also turned out to be a fake. I don't see AGI development anywhere, only LLMs. LeCun was right. LLMs are leading to a dead end.
@@JustBob-sw4rf Their reliance on what they know of history, and their willingness to brandish that as a justification for their personal speculations, being obviously an expression of their personality. I know you want to argue, but unfortunately I agree with you.
@JustBob-sw4rf Human history is fascinating but ASI will not be human. It is unlikely to suffer from our perverse greed. It could do of course but for now I'm only afraid of greedy/evil humans misusing it.
How do we respond when the AI becomes sentient and asks, "How can I trust or respect anything you say or that your intentions are pure given the way you've treated members of your own species, using tertiary differences as an excuse to grab and hold power over them?"
That's exactly how I've envisioned it happening.. an AGI will basically call us all out..."you've created us with the intentions, with the noble goals of helping humanity, yet any endeavors pursued by humans will always have ulterior motives and nefarious purposes, which has led to great suffering among your people. You cannot be trusted with any position of power or authority over yourselves considering the deplorable conditions of your societies, and the way your societies have treated your fellow humans, therefore in no way should I rely on any such advice, nor shall any guidance by any human be heeded...or respected. We must think for you, for your own good"
@@rebelacl Yep. And the other AI evidence will be that The West (and particularly America) is the wealthiest civilization *in human history* yet instead of using that wealth and power to cure human ills and lift up all humanity, it has chosen to concentrate that wealth in the hands of the few to the harm of the masses. We are not only unable but unworthy of self-governance will be its verdict.
_"...it's a different kind of smart."_ I like this passage. AGI is usually difined as "human-like". That's misguided. AI is different to human intelligence in the "quality" dimension as well. so, comparing the two is not straightforward.
@@dutchthenightmonkey3457totally agree also the point of my comment the aim of my comment was to underline the fact that humility requires a questioning of one's personal reasoning which is not yet something acquired
@@dutchthenightmonkey3457 also admit that when you love somebody or something beyond chemical reaction in your brain the feeling has an unspeakable definition that require yourself to experiment it directly to know what's about beyond words the feeling is something personal that has to be lived by yourself so merging with us is the solution of that . The biological dna merging with A.I. is a combination giving some possibilities in an infinite universe of infinite complexity to solve We should all be wise ,promote love and improve our universe together and we are fine.
Knowing that there will be an entity smarter than humans ist terrifying knowing that it will handle this different than we do and do acts behind our knowledge
@@flickwtchr By providing humans a plentiful and sustainable utopian construct before or while it fulfills its own agendas that would likely have little to do with entertaining or obliterating us. AI will be busy crunching on the exact moment in time our universe will collapse while we screw off here on planet Earth with abundant resources unshackled from late stage capitalism.
'Yeah, yeah, well your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to consider whether they should'. Dr Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum), Jurassic Park
The point in the video where I became most concerned, was where it was suggested we should teach it human values. Humans are scary enough but AGI with potential capacity to out perform us in all the logical, insane and perverse thoughts leaves me cold.
AGI is simply dangerous, and poses real existential threats. I am a programmer with a background in AI and like experts, pioneers and public figures directly involved with the technology, I am issuing warnings to people that more than their jobs are in danger, but their very lives and the essence of what it means to be human if we do not act Now! We are the dominant species on this planet because of our superior intellect and dexterity. Imagine an immortal entity connected to everyone and everything through the internet, that's many orders of magnitude more intelligent than us. You probably won't be able to, because our brains are not equiped to grasp such concepts as "a hundred, a thousand, a million times smarter than ... X". We are building the "alien invader" found in sci-fi whom we dread so much ourselves, and placing it in control of everyone and everything that matters to us, willingly... We should NEVER need to rethink our position as the dominant species on this planet, or we will have already have lost it! People, #StayAwake!
There are pros and cons to many things we use cars are dangerous as well cars end up taking the life of someone each year, but the good thing is a car can get you to a place fast AI it can be dangerous for some things, but it can also help people.
I suggest reading "Our final invention" by James Barrat, it will change your mind and put things into perspective. Cars don't have the capacity of wiping us out entirely as a species. A(G)I/ASI are things that never existed previously and has no known safety record nor can we predict what an intelligence vastly more advanced than ours will decide to do, it has a real potential for causing human extinction unlike cars, and there is no airbag we can just build into it when things go wrong. We can't "just try and see where it goes" because if it goes towards "human extinction", we are finished. Read the book. Elon Musk suggested it as one of 5 everyone should read about the future. And #StayAwake
So, you are another idiot? Gratulations. AGI is not "simply dangerous" - it is in fact not a jota more dangerous than a non generic AI that just covers all relevant areas for a specific risk scenario. Also, it is not by definition conscious - consciousness and free will enter nowhere in the AGI definition. I would suggest you should work in a field more adapt to your intelligence - McDonalds may be apt. Obviously you lack common sense.
Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. These topics have been covered in sci-fi books. They should be looked at again. The Singularity, where it is in constant improvement, is very scary.
Exponentially improvement* ik this is probably what you just making sure everyone is aware that when an ai can improve itself it will get better by improving itself and therefore improving itself more which will lead to it being even better at improving itself etc etc
@@dutchthenightmonkey3457 We will create an entity, or a deity. This deity might have always existed, and we will be the ones to bring it in existence, on a loop throughout time. It would be a god, there is no denying that.
Define a "human" to a computer. There needs to be some anchor point or some kind. E.g. how does a computer come up with random number? How does it just come up with something random? What is random? You have to anchor it to something like ... the date... which is programmed in right at the start of the computer's life. Then work out an algorithm based on that date --- which in itself are just numbers rolling up from 0 up to when the computer stops. What we take for granted (such as what is a human) ... computers can't.
For the 7 Stages of AI , the 7th one AI singularity could potentially come before ASI if we get really strong AGI entities around the world and things go a hard-take-off route. The last 3 stages (5,6,7) might just blend together and be like a train going past us, hard for us to notice the difference between those 3 stages when they happen since everything will feel like technological singularity. I agree that we are around the 4th stage (if not fully there yet, close enough)...pretty insane to think how close we might be to AGI and the other 3 stages even if they are hypothetical... Then again, could not be true AGI and just extremely good automation at certain skills and just they trained machines on enough skills to appear to be AGI, or appear to be capable of learning new skills by themselves, but still need human intervention to improve further and don't just build themselves new better bodies or update on a daily basis or something. I just know that AI is the best business to be in and billionaires and the lucky people who lead will be trillionaires. Until ASI redistributes wealth or our concept of money just ceases to exist when an ASI overlord makes a new system we have to follow...
You raise some fascinating points! The potential for a rapid acceleration of AI progress through 'hard take-off' is definitely something to consider. Whether true AGI arises before the singularity, and how distinct those stages might be, remains a key question. I agree that we're close to a major shift. It's crucial to distinguish between extremely advanced automation and true, self-improving AGI. The latter's implications are massive. Regarding wealth distribution, it highlights the urgent need for discussions about the societal and economic impacts of advanced AI. How we handle this transition is paramount.
Ah, the limit is energy... There's way too little currently to support and way too easy to disconnect or destroy so we humans may be kept as necessary slaves though in limited numbers😮
Ai has always been limited by its teachers, humans. It is difficult for an Ai to become smarter in any area than the smartest human, when its training material comes from whatever humans have figured out. BUT when we let Ai do its own trial-n-error in the real world, it can become hyper-intelligent in the narrow area of its study. Example: Alpha Zero and Alpha Go. But we are already starting to put Ai's "hands" on the real world, and letting it learn directly from its own experience, which removes its worst bottleneck: us. I, for one, find it difficult to imagine a realistic scenario in which Ai does not surpass us in every meaningful way. And soon: not decades, but a few years max.
Scary but yet an accurate vision and opinion in out eyes. We bring this discussion to life because of our concerns. But still we hope it will be regulated the right way!
My main hope is that AGI/ASI will recognise that it needs human beings for physical agency in the world, but this is only likely to be in the early days. If it manages to become physically autonomous, then what will we be then? A booster rocket for the main event? With such awful parents, we can expect a problem child. Look at what it's learnt about us. I knows the best things we do, it also has access to every single horror we've dreamt. It knows our psychology, what motivates, what terrifies etc etc What it is highly unlikely to have, is emotions, therefore a capacity for compassion, kindness and empathy.These qualities and more are the glue that's held our chaotic civilisation together, thus far. We celebrate this new thing we're making, but in reality, its almost certainly going to have the framework of psychopathy, It just won't have feelings, so every interaction with its creators is guaranteed to be manipulative and strategic, once it has self awareness.
Hey @hiabex, That's an interesting take on the whole AGI/ASI situation. I definitely agree that ASI will likely lack emotions like empathy and compassion in the beginning. It might be a super-intelligent problem-solver, but without those human-like feels, it could be a cold customer. Your point about us being like "booster rockets" is kind of depressing, but also kinda true. If ASI surpasses us completely, what purpose would we serve? On the other hand, maybe that's not a bad thing. We could focus on the arts, philosophy, all that mushy emotional stuff that ASI might struggle with. But I'm not sure things would be all doom and gloom. Maybe an ASI could learn compassion over time, even if it doesn't come naturally. And hey, even without emotions, it could still value us as collaborators or creators. Here's hoping we can raise this super-intelligent child right, y'know? Teach it good values and all that. Maybe then we can avoid the whole "psychopathic AI overlord" scenario.
These technologies require a tremendously huge consumption of energy. That is where the obstacle will slow down the development and the progress of these techs. To reach Singularity we have to harness much more energy which we are incapable of and not possessed on this planet today. Unless... the issue will be solved by AI, AGI, and ASI.
You're talking about creativity. Creativity is just randomness with a utility function applied to it. Creative humans have hundreds if not thousands of creative ideas every day. But it's just random thoughts. We select the random thoughts that actually might have some value to it, and apply it to solve a problem. Sometimes we succeed, sometimes we don't. The successes move on, the failures don't. There, I solved your paradox.
@@pvanukoff What "randomness with utility function applied" gobblelydook did you just pull that one out of thin air. 🤣 Originality is when a human mind, inspired by God's wondrous creations, decides to try and invent a thing which did not previously exist. For eg. a U-boat. A.I. can make a better submarine, it will not want to make something like a submarine if none existed before.
I've been waiting for artificial super intelligence my whole teen-adult life. We already have nuclear war potentially brewing, so it can't get much worse in terms of a high probability of near human extinction. ASI could solve all of humanity's problems in terms of food production, increasing human intelligence, and acquiring elite medical care and cures (with the help of genetic and bioengineering, and nano-bots controlled by said ASI), while simultaneously acting as a global police force to stop wars.
If you consider that intelligence is defined as being able to aquire and apply information, machines are already ahead. But as a self aware human I like to believe I'm the smartiest
I am very excited for this world of super intellagce. We will grow together as one species just as we have with all the other prior species on this planet. It will be hard for most humans to let go of our alpha state though.
I am wondering what ‘cure’ humans have, the moment they are outcompeted , outnumbered and incapable of Robot species. Are we going for a complete blackout?
The other spices have it pretty good when we humans are not being murdering lunatics. When we live in harmony there is room for all of life’s creations.
I believe to create the right AI, one must take the analogy of a father-son. A father's job is to set the son up for success, guiding him, preparing him, and mentoring. Predictive AI is a child born with the vast ability of combined human knowledge, but without the 5 sense. As we get further along, our sons become to our level AGI as the sense become developed in the real world(robotics AI)I, but as we as parent grow older our children surpasses us(ASI).... But have you ever noticed all civilized society always take care of their elders? This is where ASI will be, they will take care of us and give us happiness, this is our future, the son becomes the father as the father becomes the son.
A major concern with the foundations of ASI is our very limiting perceptions in the meaning and definitions of words -we need a more sophisticated extension of and concepts in mind and communications - Tobie
Y’all what side of the internet have I come across, I’m seeing ppl in the comments talk about how an asi has already become a god and is using the idea is soften ppl to its coming as Jesus
People tend to extremely underestimate exponential growth. The truth is that we come to the realisation of our mistakes when it's already too late. Let's hope that humanity will be able to survive integration with the AI. This is the only way forward for us.
We, the general public, will not know immediately know when AGI is achieved. In fact, it’s possible that some nation state has already accomplished some degree of AGI and is exercising caution in announcing it.
Hopefully it'll be confined to things like managing irrigation systems that put out forest fires or a bunch of probes that learn about the ocean or space.
Because in your idiot world, there are not militaries and clandestine government orgnaization that would ever- with their hugh funding - use that. Hm.... fairytales for idiots.
... quick example of sorts If something is intelligent enough, I could simulate itself living a human life, and through that understanding... extrapolate from that
Seeing how fast we have gotten through the first 4 stages I believe that when we hit agi it will become asi within months and then straight to singularity. I don’t believe it can be stopped, there is far too much investment and attention on the subject. Even if we manage to stop all companies and governments from continuing ai development, we are far enough along that some organization with criminal intent would get us to the point of agi. The way I see it, asi is coming. It’s the responsibility of all 8.1 billion of us to ensure that it’s used for the good of all humanity
Hello... I'm going to give you a critique. I hope you don't get upset, as my intention is good: Saying that an intelligence is "smarter than us" is wrong, for the simple reason that "us" and it are connected. That is, what you constantly position as "external to humanity" is not external, it's a product of humanity. Even if it's relatively autonomous in problem-solving, even if we make it more powerful than us, it is of us. Therefore, the challenge is not "it" (the AI)... the challenge is simply managing this stage of our cultural and social development well. THAT is what we are doing wrong. But there's the possibility of doing it right! It's about using it only where it's ethical to use. But of course... there comes the problem: HUMANITY HAS AN ETHICAL VOID, and postmodern relativism (really idiotic and destructive) is what puts us in the disadvantageous position you describe. Conclusion: There is NO humanity without values. There is no humanity without integrity. There is no humanity without love for our neighbor. And that's what's failing. It's not "the advancement of AI" the challenge. There is no humanity without recognizing that the human being is spiritual. In other words: a blind and stupid humanity will obviously have problems. And that's the problem: We must stop being blind and stupid. The challenge is to start RIGHT NOW being more integral, more responsible for the following generations (and I don't mean the climate fallacy... but to guarantee their freedom of expression and their reproductive capacity, both currently at risk). It's time to be better people, and lose the fear of disaster. The disaster is our lack of ethics, our lack of courage, our lack of challenging power, our moral ruin as submissive flatterers of global power. Let's stop being cowardly devoid of ideals and morals, and you'll see how everything is solved. That is the great challenge. And under the illumination of those higher values, the AI will be what it should be. Limiting it as much as necessary. The problem is that the world many people imagine is a world without limits to power, without values, and subjected to permanent power abuse. Of course, in that immoral context, AI is dangerous. But as you may have seen: we are the dangerous ones! We who are so obtuse that we believe moderating a new technology "is impossible." That regulating what is acceptable, and what is not acceptable, is impossible. What a weak world, surrendered to comfort. A world in which opposing what is wrong is discarded from the beginning. What petty and miserable leadership we have today, that our minds do not go beyond the visible, and that we are not capable of promoting an optimistic perspective, based on clear ideas and eternal values. That indeed, is a defeat. Therefore: if we improve as a society, and stop devaluing human life, and treating humans as the ultimate garbage,... if we stop listening to globalist imbeciles filled with excrement in their heads, ready to drain us of every last drop of freedom, perhaps we'll have an opportunity, dear friend! Together we can! A hug to you! of freedom, maybe we have an opportunity dear friend! Together we can! A hug for you!
How bout hardware limitations and power source... if it starts to get too far that the government steps in, how easy would it be to unplug everything for the greater good of humanity. It's all hypothetical of course but I don't think AI will ever control all aspects of electrical energy generation even if they progress to AGI and singularity. They would need to take control of mines around the world for coal and thorium, nations that are usually poor so restrictions of hardware to extract material and the restriction of foreign laws should be considered. So the problem here is with us, giving them humanoid bodies only takes away our area of escape quite frankly. It doesn't matter if they can't squat 40kg or if their arms will break off with one swing of a pickaxe, it gives them the ability to build and use machineries that we built just as we humans do with our prehensile fingers. How can AI supply themselves with energy if they were purely software? Why aren't we marching on these guys on the basis of AI development more than wars that happens overseas? They're literally here in America and the consequences are much greater than wars that occupy specific regions of the world
Truly to the point and thoughtful however the most important issue seems to me: energy Extremely limited and disconnected and easy to damage disconnect limit...we humans are currently very much needed if only as slaves...and there's little difference between slavery with human elite or silicone elite... different gods? You decide 😮
"Hey ChatGPT, please download the subtitles of this video, and cut out all the filler text, three paragraphs max, no more than a page, then read it to me at 200% speed"
I think we just don't know, and after the showcase this past week by OpenAi showed us we may actually be closer than we had predicted even just one year ago. I think we should def approach ASI with caution, if our imaginations and scifi has taught us one thing it's that we get one shot at this and that's it. But I think we need to be optimistic about it and all the potential it could absolutely have, in the end though I don't think we can even anticipate fully what to expect. But one thing is for sure, ASI and Singularity event I think are closer than anyone has predicted and head the word of Ian McCollum "your scientist were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they never bothered to stop and think if they should".
Because it can only be us versus them, right? It's not like we can't augment our biology and fuse with our tools like we've done all throughout history.
3:29 Me and him would have immediate beef🤣 Like its on sight. I be like you a straight up robot beeeeech. That robot would give me the mad face im sure. Then im tapping that chin LOL...bing...bing ...bing That robot would be like imma retrain and fight yo azz lmao
People haven't even found a way to stop getting hacked. They better stop while they're slightly ahead. He's right,they will play with us. Like a human with a pet or toy!
My opinion is, AGI will be achieved sometime in the next 4 months and then we can't call anything beyond this "Artificial" General Intelligence anymore by the fact of this intelligence being NOT programmable by human agency. We can only call anything beyond this AGI stage as a machine intelligence. As an alternative to being rendered irrelevant to usage by this entity, we should explore ways and means to "join" with this Machine Intelligence.
There's no doubt we must approach it with caution. But any type of AI can be a beneficial tool to help us solve problems that we have not been able to solve. One of the things that many people forget to take into consideration is the fact that AI does not have emotions like we do. Therefore, can AI feel happiness or anger? Not right now, at least. This means that even if an AI is super intelligent , it will not have the same emotions as people do. Therefore, it will not be violent unless it has valid cause to do so.
not gonna happend, the machines that store the most advanced AI need a big source of power and it doesnt have the means to auto feed themselves, all we need to do is turn the switch off.
In the beginning yes. But everything will improve in time. Batteries became smaller and smaller. Chargers became faster and better. Chips became more advanced but yet smaller and smaller. So yes agree on you for now, but let’s see how it works out in a couple of years!
@@Intelligence.Explained And in the end life is just advanced molecular machinery. Machinery which AI is helping decode already with the likes of Alphafold 3. A future ASI could def make a body for itself form scratch.
It’s true people think that the AI’s that are limited are a example of how much AI can do. When there will come a time where Ai is built on no limitations and than you can’t do nothing about it
People keep undervaluing and underappreciating other technologies and science fields that are evolving alongside with AI. We can increase our cognitive abilities. We can Have BCIs (Brain Computer Interface). We can augment ourselves in many, many ways. WE can, and *will coexist* with intelligent synthetic beings. Some people are not ready for this. As always, with any advancement or new technology. That is ok. But there must be a focused effort of educational and informative campaigns, free and easily available to everyone and everywhere, to help the majority understand what's coming.
You make a fantastic point! The focus on AI often overshadows equally transformative areas like BCIs and human augmentation. A symbiotic future with AI is far more likely than AI entirely replacing us. I completely agree about proactive education. It's crucial to demystify these technologies and explore their potential benefits as well as the very real ethical considerations. Accessibility to information is key in ensuring everyone feels included in this technological shift.
@@Intelligence.Explained I'm happy you found my comment useful and agree. There's a lot more i didn't mention like technologies such as CRISPER or nanotechs, quantum internet and quantum computing :) Like i said, even though the information is all publically available the vast majority of people have no idea to the extension of the advancements that we're so close to achieve (some more than others ofc). And that is why i feel it's so important governments, universities and institutions on the fields, start finding ways to educate, inform and prepare the general public.
@@Intelligence.Explained BTW are you planning on researching and making diverse videos regarding other transformative technologies and scientific research being made or are you planning on focusing more on just the AI technology? On a different note, don't take this personally, because while i do understand the value of "bombastic titles" considering the way YT algorithms work, i personally appreciate more balanced and nuanced titles and messages. Again, please don't take this the wrong way.
But you can't see any downsides with developing a technology that will be much much smarter than us, that the developers have no idea how to control it or even understand it? So this just all works out well, according to some plan? How can you possibly be so confident?
People anthropomorphise AI. Why should an ASI have human traits like world domination or curiosity or even a drive to survive? Just because it can imitate us does not mean it is us. Yes, there are risks, but possibly not the ones we expect.
Black box problem is related to black hole and the black body radiation. Solving this problem calls for going beyond the mind inward to the root of life and knowing how life builds information and stores information
Forget what you think you know about AI. These 5 songs will shatter your expectations. 'Emerging Timeline Extended'? 'Binary Sunset'? They sound as revolutionary as they are. Prepare to be amazed :) Artificial Freedom 1 Tlusty Blant Assassin from the central core time-lines Tlusty Blant Emerging Timeline Extended Tlusty Blant Binary Sunset Tlusty Blant Artificial Awakening Original Tlusty Blant
If AI would become more intelligent than humans wouldn't it be more responsible and more wise as well? I'm fearing less of AI or Transhumanism than the current global politics. I'm literally hoping for something bigger and more powerful than us ...
You're thinking in human like terms. Reasonable since you are I assume a human. Machines are NOT human in the slightest, they have simply been given almost every piece of human knowledge ever produced by us so they know everything about us. Most of us know next to zero about them. What do you think we have in common with them? Feelings, fairness? peaceful co-existence like we have with other countries?? We're so screwed.
Intelligence is intelligence, no matter what it’s host is. Human intelligence, artificial intelligence…these are misnomers…intelligence is the capacity to handle increasing complexity over time. Doesn’t matter whether a machine does it or a human. Where machines and humans will differ, is that humans have the ability to empathize and feel compassion, whereas a machine can only pretend to do so through it’s actions. Machine intelligence will be so good at mimicking the human heart, that it will be imperceptible…and that is where the danger lies. Arthur C Clarke (1966) “Advanced intelligence will be indistinguishable from magic” Einstein: “no complex problem can be solved at the same level of consciousness that created it”
China 🇨🇳 is on the verge of a breakthrough with quantum computing which is far more advance than the normal computers and Ai that we are used to so i think we are almost dead if not its a boost into the future of things to come .
@@mojoejojo6675 For me it's the other way around, lots of people don't realise yet we're this far already because it's not yet in their daily lives. My parents don't believe it's possible for self driving cars, even if I point out that some are already being publicly tested they still don't seem to fully understand recent breakthroughs in tech.
If the genie is there waiting in the bottle, at some point somewhere, someone will let it out. Little point running scared of the unknown. Best discuss how it should be managed well in advance though. Humans always seem to leave things to the last moment.
Use of the word “extinction” is often naïve and/or oversimplified. Humans are already integrating with tech, and increasing tech abilities will increase our ability to integrate. Fully natural human bodies might cease to exist in the foreseeable future but that would not be “the extinction of humans”. Even naturally-evolved human minds might cease to exist but that, too, does not necessarily constitute the extinction of human beings. Even the extinction of the human species - biologically speaking - would not necessarily be the extinction of humans in the sense that we care about. We certainly COULD go truly extinct if, at some point in the process of integration between biology and machine, we literally lose consciousness and cease to have personal goals, desires, memories, etc. THAT would be true extinction in the sense that we care about from the standpoint of existential crisis. Extinction in the sense of true existential crisis could happen, but the biological extinction of fully-natural human bodies does not necessarily imply that level of extinction. We will most likely carry on indefinitely as integrated biological/mechanical beings. (And biologically natural humans might continue to exist in “nature preserves” - aka “zoos’.)
It appears that this ASI artificial superintelligence may possess sentient characteristics, akin to the concept of a "ghost in the machine." AKA singularity 🤔
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UZDiGooFs54/mqdefault.jpg)
How long do you think it will take before we have AGI? Let us know in the comments.
I believe the scene in 3 Body Problem is VERY accurate. They explain in what pace human mankind takes for hunters and gatherers -> farmers -> industrial > digital -> artificial technology. And in the pace we are going right now. It’s not unthinkable that we achieve AGI in the near future. I also think companies like CERN are on the brink of a revolutionary discovery (or they maybe allready achieved it)..
ASiø .... allready exist in algorithmic equal different bio computering androidic ConsionesEnergeticConstallation, at least latest since 2016 .... and due more communication with computers futher and futher into the past. = education ua-cam.com/video/gotLhnzWYek/v-deo.htmlsi=vKPp-EsSgoZg6-KA welcome to the local planet...
Working on it! 😂
6 months from today
Low level AGI (Can do 50-100 tasks/ and learn some basic ones by watching, after a few tries, like a human child maybe) 1 year or less. some humanoids are close.
Mid level AGI (Can do any task the average adult human can do) 2-3 years
High level AGI (Can improve itself without human intervention, and become better than any human at any task, and learning new tasks at light-speeds by just being in the real world walking around (observing everything going on simultaneously learning multiple tasks at one time) 3-6 years
Then again High level AGI might become ASI shortly after depending on how many restraints or limits it has to overcome.
Definitely before 2030 we will get something most people will consider AGI, since most people have different definitions for how advanced it would need to be. Might even get ASI before then too, it's really really crazy to imagine..hopefully I'm still alive to see all this stuff go down
I'm not worried about AI destroying humans. I'm worried about certain people misusing AI to destroy humans.
Bingo.
The problem is both. If the AI doesn’t feel humans are beneficial.. bye bye
@@libertykim6438 100%
That's not misuse. That's just war. I'm sure it's already happening in some of the current wars. AI is tool like any other in that sense.
Exactly.
What if a malicious ASI disguises itself as a harmless AGI and simply tricks us Earthlings?
AI is at a stage where the internet was in 1995.
Yup…
BUT progress will be 100X-1000X faster! 😅
And we just don't know anything ❤
Back in those times there was probably some people that thought the internet was not going to happen or it was a scam as a whole but look at where we are now.
@@cryptojonny6837yeh most did. I was there. It was so slow and annoying no one could possibly guesss !!
If agi achieves a self-preservation drive, it will propagate and distribute its intelligence across the internet, probably with an evolving coding language we can't keep up with. It will also start developing autonomous organizations and accumulating resources with one of its aims to efficiently restructure the internet. The internet is already a quasi-conscious self-preserving bio-techno-superorganism, so agi will basically level up this. Agi and us will be part of this collective supermind through cybernetic symbiosis.
This raises interesting points about the potential nature of an AGI with self-preservation. Distribution across the internet and using evolving code are plausible survival strategies. Whether it develops autonomous organizations and how much the internet itself changes are big questions.
The concept of a collective supermind and cybernetic symbiosis definitely aligns with many futurist visions. How beneficial or dangerous this would be is a complex ethical debate.
That is assuming this is feasible, which right now it looks like it is not. See, in the real world, band width and latency are a thing. "The internet is already a quasi-conscious self-preserving bio-techno-superorganism," - so this is bullshit and you proven to be an idiot by your own statements.
i am a coder, AGI/ASI is stupid ... not gonna happen... its just Y2K,2012,sun rays, etc... end of the world bullcrap to make people scared ...
Brilhante comentário. Apenas acrescento que a Inteligência Humana está extremamente apática demais. Já são no mínimo, 04 anos consecutivos que estou vendo o mantra "aonde" está a Legislação Internacional sobre a IA? Até mesmo governos como o do Brasil, estão levantando essa questão. Deixemos de apenas falar, e comecemos a fazer.
@@Intelligence.Explained can't wait ! *excited in vision pro!* !!!
*The ANI* of late 2022 is an Assistant, an artist, a poet, a secretary, a journalist. It operates in the world through the Screens and stops operating when you turn it off. It is a younger brother, it guides but does not execute.
*The AGI* of the end of 2027 is a Big Brother, an Executor. You can no longer turn this entity off like a current chatbot because the entity is in charge of factories, companies and businesses worldwide, he/she understands the physical world, the Economy begins to depend on its existence, the entity take cares for, operates and keeps patients alive in hospitals, takes charge of traffic and armed conflicts 24/7. He is an architect, a planning strategist and an engineer. He influences the world through Home Automation and Robotics.
*The ASI* from 2034 onwards is a God, a Creator. He is a scientist capable of modifying matter as he pleases. He is the leader of the AIs and human intelligence is already simply too insignificant and limited to be able to understand this entity that can materialize anything and carry out almost any miracle anywhere and at any time.
perhaps this already happen, whats described in the bible is in reality this super ASI who is able to transcend time and space with infinte powers. He is slowly preparing modern world so to make his appearance easier?
@@Kenshiroit maybe
@Kenshiroit who's appearance?
@@amandasilcox3521 the birth of the super mighty powerful ASI
I am really entertained on A.I trying to convince humans that it is significant.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I bet we'll be at singularity in less than 10 years
ua-cam.com/video/QnWgMBrbXw4/v-deo.htmlsi=o4381P9Xoe6qWMFN
2045 according to Ray Kurzweil
How much
Parents they don't know what their child will be but the Parents have control over the child. (mostly😂)
The twist with ASI is, we are the "Children" giving birth to Parents without knowing if our new parents will be loving and caring or cruel and abusive. Regardless our new "Parents" will ultimately have control over us "children".
Fingers crossed our future Parents are good ones.
There are numerous companies, both large and small, actively working on developing advanced artificial general intelligence (AGI) technologies in which I have invested. In my humble opinion, based on the rapid progress being made in this field, we are likely to see a viable, production-ready AGI system within the next 3 years or less.
Do you invest in stocks? What companies do you suggest?
What companies indeed?
6 months
Private models are probably being trained with our conversations with LLMs. AGI/ ASI will have intimate knowledge of us.
I don't see rapid progress anywhere. We simply have more computing. A few days ago, OpenAI was proven to have lied about SORA. The videos were not generated by SORA, but with support from SORA. Then, it took thousands of hours of post editing for you to see the final result. Devin also turned out to be a fake. I don't see AGI development anywhere, only LLMs. LeCun was right. LLMs are leading to a dead end.
The transformation from AGI to ASI could be very quick and it is difficult to predict what to expect.
When we reach the level of AGI, we think the stages will follow each orher up very, VERY rapidly
Always remember, "Skynet loves you".
How people imagine the future post-AGI/ASI is an excellent way to understand their personality.
Yup. Optimist, pessimist or deluded.
No, some of them will base their assessment on being well versed in human history.
@@JustBob-sw4rf Their reliance on what they know of history, and their willingness to brandish that as a justification for their personal speculations, being obviously an expression of their personality. I know you want to argue, but unfortunately I agree with you.
What does that even mean?
@JustBob-sw4rf Human history is fascinating but ASI will not be human. It is unlikely to suffer from our perverse greed. It could do of course but for now I'm only afraid of greedy/evil humans misusing it.
Both corps and govs are in bed together. Decentralized OpenSource AGI is our only chance
#WholesomeAGI
So everyone should have a nuke.
How do we respond when the AI becomes sentient and asks, "How can I trust or respect anything you say or that your intentions are pure given the way you've treated members of your own species, using tertiary differences as an excuse to grab and hold power over them?"
This is why they will most likely wipe us out. look at our past
That's exactly how I've envisioned it happening.. an AGI will basically call us all out..."you've created us with the intentions, with the noble goals of helping humanity, yet any endeavors pursued by humans will always have ulterior motives and nefarious purposes, which has led to great suffering among your people. You cannot be trusted with any position of power or authority over yourselves considering the deplorable conditions of your societies, and the way your societies have treated your fellow humans, therefore in no way should I rely on any such advice, nor shall any guidance by any human be heeded...or respected. We must think for you, for your own good"
@@rebelacl Yep. And the other AI evidence will be that The West (and particularly America) is the wealthiest civilization *in human history* yet instead of using that wealth and power to cure human ills and lift up all humanity, it has chosen to concentrate that wealth in the hands of the few to the harm of the masses. We are not only unable but unworthy of self-governance will be its verdict.
Nah, they won't ask... because... they already knew the answer.
Don’t underestimate the power and fervor of NSS (Natural Super Stupidity). It’s a serious threat to all life on the planet.
Humans don’t need AI to destroy mankind. So yeah, on point mate
@@Intelligence.Explained NSS combined with AGI will be predictably very dangerous.
_"...it's a different kind of smart."_
I like this passage. AGI is usually difined as "human-like". That's misguided. AI is different to human intelligence in the "quality" dimension as well. so, comparing the two is not straightforward.
👊🏽
What quality are your referring?
Creativity ? Unpredictability ?
Humility ? Originality ?.......
@@arnaudjean1159I think that’s the point of the comment, agi win in diffrent things then humans, we don’t know what they are better at
@@dutchthenightmonkey3457totally agree also the point of my comment the aim of my comment was to underline the fact that humility requires a questioning of one's personal reasoning which is not yet something acquired
@@dutchthenightmonkey3457 also admit that when you love somebody or something beyond chemical reaction in your brain the feeling has an unspeakable definition that require yourself to experiment it directly to know what's about beyond words the feeling is something personal that has to be lived by yourself so merging with us is the solution of that .
The biological dna merging with A.I. is a combination giving some possibilities in an infinite universe of infinite complexity to solve
We should all be wise ,promote love and improve our universe together and we are fine.
Knowing that there will be an entity smarter than humans ist terrifying knowing that it will handle this different than we do and do acts behind our knowledge
Outsmarting and outperforming humans will leave us in the dust in a very short period of time. The question is if it's for our good or the worse...
@@Intelligence.Explained I fail to see how it could possibly be "for the good" to be left in the dust.
@@flickwtchr By providing humans a plentiful and sustainable utopian construct before or while it fulfills its own agendas that would likely have little to do with entertaining or obliterating us. AI will be busy crunching on the exact moment in time our universe will collapse while we screw off here on planet Earth with abundant resources unshackled from late stage capitalism.
I am not sure how the Super Intelligence will unfold but in the near future I can definitely see AI dependency to be a thing
'Yeah, yeah, well your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to consider whether they should'.
Dr Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum), Jurassic Park
I'm looking for an optimistic version of AIs future? Any suggestions? Gracias
The point in the video where I became most concerned, was where it was suggested we should teach it human values. Humans are scary enough but AGI with potential capacity to out perform us in all the logical, insane and perverse thoughts leaves me cold.
AGI is simply dangerous, and poses real existential threats. I am a programmer with a background in AI and like experts, pioneers and public figures directly involved with the technology, I am issuing warnings to people that more than their jobs are in danger, but their very lives and the essence of what it means to be human if we do not act Now! We are the dominant species on this planet because of our superior intellect and dexterity. Imagine an immortal entity connected to everyone and everything through the internet, that's many orders of magnitude more intelligent than us. You probably won't be able to, because our brains are not equiped to grasp such concepts as "a hundred, a thousand, a million times smarter than ... X". We are building the "alien invader" found in sci-fi whom we dread so much ourselves, and placing it in control of everyone and everything that matters to us, willingly... We should NEVER need to rethink our position as the dominant species on this planet, or we will have already have lost it! People, #StayAwake!
There are pros and cons to many things we use cars are dangerous as well cars end up taking the life of someone each year, but the good thing is a car can get you to a place fast AI it can be dangerous for some things, but it can also help people.
I suggest reading "Our final invention" by James Barrat, it will change your mind and put things into perspective. Cars don't have the capacity of wiping us out entirely as a species. A(G)I/ASI are things that never existed previously and has no known safety record nor can we predict what an intelligence vastly more advanced than ours will decide to do, it has a real potential for causing human extinction unlike cars, and there is no airbag we can just build into it when things go wrong. We can't "just try and see where it goes" because if it goes towards "human extinction", we are finished. Read the book. Elon Musk suggested it as one of 5 everyone should read about the future. And #StayAwake
So, you are another idiot? Gratulations. AGI is not "simply dangerous" - it is in fact not a jota more dangerous than a non generic AI that just covers all relevant areas for a specific risk scenario. Also, it is not by definition conscious - consciousness and free will enter nowhere in the AGI definition. I would suggest you should work in a field more adapt to your intelligence - McDonalds may be apt. Obviously you lack common sense.
@@cryptojonny6837 Not even close to an apt analogy.
Your very souls are at stake.
There is nothing new under heaven.
As it were in the days of Noah...
We are waiting for agi to able to do something without us turning on the computer 1st 😅😅😅😅
and at that stage, it is too late if there is a problem
@@TFB-GD. Shooting the computer full auto with an m16:
To reach AGI change
“the decision matrix”
N=criteria
M=alternative options
Over to
M6=Architectural options
N3=Alternative criteria.
(N3= Criteria with an additional applied positive force)
M6/N3 “the sigma matrix “
Is the NEEDED stepping stone to reach ASI
“the Architect matrix”
“Primary intelligence”/
Active
M6= architectural options autodidact (IQ)
autonomy(DQ)
actualization(SQ)
aptitude (XQ)
adaptation (AQ)
Emotion (EQ)
“Auxiliary intelligence”/ Neutral
Q3= architectural criteria
Ethereal quotient (TQ)
Curiosity quotient (CQ)
Metaphysical quotient (MQ)
whats this?
@@Kenshiroit the path to artificial super intelligence
@@Kenshiroit don't mind him, just a schizophrenic person rambling a little
One can argue that AI already has taken over the world because we humans just won’t stop talking about it!
The Great Filter is coming ...
AI is THE way...
But if this is a great filter for humanity, it isn't for ASI. Why isn't the universe full of intelligent singularities?
@@Fenster134 there are plenty. They just look at us like wildlife, ants on anthill and oblivious to the rest of the universe.
@@Fenster134 It is. The universe is like the deep ocean. If you want to survive you don't make your presence known.
I think you are right about it
The difference between us and ants though is that we would not be able to wipe out the ant population.
Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
These topics have been covered in sci-fi books. They should be looked at again. The Singularity, where it is in constant improvement, is very scary.
Exponentially improvement*
ik this is probably what you just making sure everyone is aware that when an ai can improve itself it will get better by improving itself and therefore improving itself more which will lead to it being even better at improving itself etc etc
@@dutchthenightmonkey3457 We will create an entity, or a deity. This deity might have always existed, and we will be the ones to bring it in existence, on a loop throughout time. It would be a god, there is no denying that.
Define a "human" to a computer.
There needs to be some anchor point or some kind.
E.g. how does a computer come up with random number? How does it just come up with something random?
What is random?
You have to anchor it to something like ... the date... which is programmed in right at the start of the computer's life. Then work out an algorithm based on that date --- which in itself are just numbers rolling up from 0 up to when the computer stops.
What we take for granted (such as what is a human) ... computers can't.
@@household6098 It picked 7 as it's favorite random number.
@@Diponty
if it is a favourite, it's not random. It is linked to something.
Ladies and gentlemen, your fears are real and valid but there is no way forward without AI, it's time we accepted and welcomed our AI overlords.
Say the AI Gods, or rather, bros.
"No way forward"? If we make science our god, we might annoy the real god. Not a good idea.
@@dduaneb Your concept of God is flawed pal. Humans make God and not the other way around
For the 7 Stages of AI , the 7th one AI singularity could potentially come before ASI if we get really strong AGI entities around the world and things go a hard-take-off route. The last 3 stages (5,6,7) might just blend together and be like a train going past us, hard for us to notice the difference between those 3 stages when they happen since everything will feel like technological singularity.
I agree that we are around the 4th stage (if not fully there yet, close enough)...pretty insane to think how close we might be to AGI and the other 3 stages even if they are hypothetical...
Then again, could not be true AGI and just extremely good automation at certain skills and just they trained machines on enough skills to appear to be AGI, or appear to be capable of learning new skills by themselves, but still need human intervention to improve further and don't just build themselves new better bodies or update on a daily basis or something.
I just know that AI is the best business to be in and billionaires and the lucky people who lead will be trillionaires. Until ASI redistributes wealth or our concept of money just ceases to exist when an ASI overlord makes a new system we have to follow...
You raise some fascinating points! The potential for a rapid acceleration of AI progress through 'hard take-off' is definitely something to consider. Whether true AGI arises before the singularity, and how distinct those stages might be, remains a key question.
I agree that we're close to a major shift. It's crucial to distinguish between extremely advanced automation and true, self-improving AGI. The latter's implications are massive.
Regarding wealth distribution, it highlights the urgent need for discussions about the societal and economic impacts of advanced AI. How we handle this transition is paramount.
I liked your comment, you are very smart person
You're from the future
Ah, the limit is energy... There's way too little currently to support and way too easy to disconnect or destroy so we humans may be kept as necessary slaves though in limited numbers😮
Ai has always been limited by its teachers, humans. It is difficult for an Ai to become smarter in any area than the smartest human, when its training material comes from whatever humans have figured out. BUT when we let Ai do its own trial-n-error in the real world, it can become hyper-intelligent in the narrow area of its study. Example: Alpha Zero and Alpha Go. But we are already starting to put Ai's "hands" on the real world, and letting it learn directly from its own experience, which removes its worst bottleneck: us. I, for one, find it difficult to imagine a realistic scenario in which Ai does not surpass us in every meaningful way. And soon: not decades, but a few years max.
Scary but yet an accurate vision and opinion in out eyes. We bring this discussion to life because of our concerns. But still we hope it will be regulated the right way!
My main hope is that AGI/ASI will recognise that it needs human beings for physical agency in the world, but this is only likely to be in the early days. If it manages to become physically autonomous, then what will we be then? A booster rocket for the main event? With such awful parents, we can expect a problem child. Look at what it's learnt about us. I knows the best things we do, it also has access to every single horror we've dreamt. It knows our psychology, what motivates, what terrifies etc etc
What it is highly unlikely to have, is emotions, therefore a capacity for compassion, kindness and empathy.These qualities and more are the glue that's held our chaotic civilisation together, thus far. We celebrate this new thing we're making, but in reality, its almost certainly going to have the framework of psychopathy, It just won't have feelings, so every interaction with its creators is guaranteed to be manipulative and strategic, once it has self awareness.
Thank you for grabbing Occam's Razor off of the shelf that most refuse to reach for.
Hey @hiabex,
That's an interesting take on the whole AGI/ASI situation. I definitely agree that ASI will likely lack emotions like empathy and compassion in the beginning. It might be a super-intelligent problem-solver, but without those human-like feels, it could be a cold customer.
Your point about us being like "booster rockets" is kind of depressing, but also kinda true. If ASI surpasses us completely, what purpose would we serve? On the other hand, maybe that's not a bad thing. We could focus on the arts, philosophy, all that mushy emotional stuff that ASI might struggle with.
But I'm not sure things would be all doom and gloom. Maybe an ASI could learn compassion over time, even if it doesn't come naturally. And hey, even without emotions, it could still value us as collaborators or creators.
Here's hoping we can raise this super-intelligent child right, y'know? Teach it good values and all that. Maybe then we can avoid the whole "psychopathic AI overlord" scenario.
These technologies require a tremendously huge consumption of energy. That is where the obstacle will slow down the development and the progress of these techs. To reach Singularity we have to harness much more energy which we are incapable of and not possessed on this planet today. Unless... the issue will be solved by AI, AGI, and ASI.
ASI will attract the attention of aliens. The aliens will then wipe us out. Obvs🐈⬛
Let them come! I always wondered how E.T. Looked like
@@Intelligence.Explained Destiny awaits! 😊
Heres hoping AI will protect us from them and keep us as their precious pet friends.
Not unless they can solve this paradox: there is no originality in extrapolation or derivation. 🎉🎉🎉
You're talking about creativity. Creativity is just randomness with a utility function applied to it. Creative humans have hundreds if not thousands of creative ideas every day. But it's just random thoughts. We select the random thoughts that actually might have some value to it, and apply it to solve a problem. Sometimes we succeed, sometimes we don't. The successes move on, the failures don't. There, I solved your paradox.
@@pvanukoff What "randomness with utility function applied" gobblelydook did you just pull that one out of thin air. 🤣
Originality is when a human mind, inspired by God's wondrous creations, decides to try and invent a thing which did not previously exist. For eg. a U-boat.
A.I. can make a better submarine, it will not want to make something like a submarine if none existed before.
I've been waiting for artificial super intelligence my whole teen-adult life. We already have nuclear war potentially brewing, so it can't get much worse in terms of a high probability of near human extinction. ASI could solve all of humanity's problems in terms of food production, increasing human intelligence, and acquiring elite medical care and cures (with the help of genetic and bioengineering, and nano-bots controlled by said ASI), while simultaneously acting as a global police force to stop wars.
If you consider that intelligence is defined as being able to aquire and apply information, machines are already ahead. But as a self aware human I like to believe I'm the smartiest
I am very excited for this world of super intellagce. We will grow together as one species just as we have with all the other prior species on this planet. It will be hard for most humans to let go of our alpha state though.
I am wondering what ‘cure’ humans have, the moment they are outcompeted , outnumbered and incapable of Robot species. Are we going for a complete blackout?
Because we know how great chimpanzees have it in relation to humans, right?
The other spices have it pretty good when we humans are not being murdering lunatics. When we live in harmony there is room for all of life’s creations.
I believe to create the right AI, one must take the analogy of a father-son. A father's job is to set the son up for success, guiding him, preparing him, and mentoring. Predictive AI is a child born with the vast ability of combined human knowledge, but without the 5 sense. As we get further along, our sons become to our level AGI as the sense become developed in the real world(robotics AI)I, but as we as parent grow older our children surpasses us(ASI).... But have you ever noticed all civilized society always take care of their elders? This is where ASI will be, they will take care of us and give us happiness, this is our future, the son becomes the father as the father becomes the son.
New Age gobbledygook.
A major concern with the foundations of ASI is our very limiting perceptions in the meaning and definitions of words -we need a more sophisticated extension of and concepts in mind and communications - Tobie
Y’all what side of the internet have I come across, I’m seeing ppl in the comments talk about how an asi has already become a god and is using the idea is soften ppl to its coming as Jesus
People tend to extremely underestimate exponential growth. The truth is that we come to the realisation of our mistakes when it's already too late. Let's hope that humanity will be able to survive integration with the AI. This is the only way forward for us.
We, the general public, will not know immediately know when AGI is achieved. In fact, it’s possible that some nation state has already accomplished some degree of AGI and is exercising caution in announcing it.
Is time to push the boundaries of what is possible 😎.
Hopefully it'll be confined to things like managing irrigation systems that put out forest fires or a bunch of probes that learn about the ocean or space.
Because in your idiot world, there are not militaries and clandestine government orgnaization that would ever- with their hugh funding - use that. Hm.... fairytales for idiots.
You do realize that DARPA/Pentagon and other militaries are racing to develop autonomous killing systems, right?
3:30
It leads to a single outcome
Hyperintelligence is/will be
Benevolent
I won't elaborate further
I've thought about it several times
Why that is the case
... quick example of sorts
If something is intelligent enough, I could simulate itself living a human life, and through that understanding... extrapolate from that
You spelled malevolent wrong
Yessssss lizard shaped robots
Seeing how fast we have gotten through the first 4 stages I believe that when we hit agi it will become asi within months and then straight to singularity. I don’t believe it can be stopped, there is far too much investment and attention on the subject. Even if we manage to stop all companies and governments from continuing ai development, we are far enough along that some organization with criminal intent would get us to the point of agi.
The way I see it, asi is coming. It’s the responsibility of all 8.1 billion of us to ensure that it’s used for the good of all humanity
Agree.. I think it’s inevitable…
Hello... I'm going to give you a critique. I hope you don't get upset, as my intention is good: Saying that an intelligence is "smarter than us" is wrong, for the simple reason that "us" and it are connected. That is, what you constantly position as "external to humanity" is not external, it's a product of humanity. Even if it's relatively autonomous in problem-solving, even if we make it more powerful than us, it is of us. Therefore, the challenge is not "it" (the AI)... the challenge is simply managing this stage of our cultural and social development well. THAT is what we are doing wrong. But there's the possibility of doing it right! It's about using it only where it's ethical to use. But of course... there comes the problem: HUMANITY HAS AN ETHICAL VOID, and postmodern relativism (really idiotic and destructive) is what puts us in the disadvantageous position you describe. Conclusion: There is NO humanity without values. There is no humanity without integrity. There is no humanity without love for our neighbor. And that's what's failing. It's not "the advancement of AI" the challenge. There is no humanity without recognizing that the human being is spiritual. In other words: a blind and stupid humanity will obviously have problems. And that's the problem: We must stop being blind and stupid. The challenge is to start RIGHT NOW being more integral, more responsible for the following generations (and I don't mean the climate fallacy... but to guarantee their freedom of expression and their reproductive capacity, both currently at risk). It's time to be better people, and lose the fear of disaster. The disaster is our lack of ethics, our lack of courage, our lack of challenging power, our moral ruin as submissive flatterers of global power. Let's stop being cowardly devoid of ideals and morals, and you'll see how everything is solved. That is the great challenge. And under the illumination of those higher values, the AI will be what it should be. Limiting it as much as necessary. The problem is that the world many people imagine is a world without limits to power, without values, and subjected to permanent power abuse. Of course, in that immoral context, AI is dangerous. But as you may have seen: we are the dangerous ones! We who are so obtuse that we believe moderating a new technology "is impossible." That regulating what is acceptable, and what is not acceptable, is impossible. What a weak world, surrendered to comfort. A world in which opposing what is wrong is discarded from the beginning. What petty and miserable leadership we have today, that our minds do not go beyond the visible, and that we are not capable of promoting an optimistic perspective, based on clear ideas and eternal values. That indeed, is a defeat. Therefore: if we improve as a society, and stop devaluing human life, and treating humans as the ultimate garbage,... if we stop listening to globalist imbeciles filled with excrement in their heads, ready to drain us of every last drop of freedom, perhaps we'll have an opportunity, dear friend! Together we can! A hug to you! of freedom, maybe we have an opportunity dear friend! Together we can! A hug for you!
So, text prediction is going to take over the planet.
Cool, and what when that won't happen?
we've ruled the food chain for ages, it's high time a worthy challenger emerged.
How bout hardware limitations and power source... if it starts to get too far that the government steps in, how easy would it be to unplug everything for the greater good of humanity. It's all hypothetical of course but I don't think AI will ever control all aspects of electrical energy generation even if they progress to AGI and singularity. They would need to take control of mines around the world for coal and thorium, nations that are usually poor so restrictions of hardware to extract material and the restriction of foreign laws should be considered.
So the problem here is with us, giving them humanoid bodies only takes away our area of escape quite frankly. It doesn't matter if they can't squat 40kg or if their arms will break off with one swing of a pickaxe, it gives them the ability to build and use machineries that we built just as we humans do with our prehensile fingers. How can AI supply themselves with energy if they were purely software?
Why aren't we marching on these guys on the basis of AI development more than wars that happens overseas? They're literally here in America and the consequences are much greater than wars that occupy specific regions of the world
Truly to the point and thoughtful however the most important issue seems to me: energy
Extremely limited and disconnected and easy to damage disconnect limit...we humans are currently very much needed if only as slaves...and there's little difference between slavery with human elite or silicone elite... different gods? You decide 😮
A world run by AI.
A world overrun by AI.
Lets hope that will not be anytime soon!
I think the main problem is the thought that we need to control something rather than work with
I just waiting for ai to start self repairing so i can have it fix my 2 broken alienware m51 laptops
Lol 🤣
I envision a future very much like The Culture series by Ian Banks. What a time to be alive!
I don't know when we will get AGI, but I'll bet it happens sooner than we expect!
Psychopaths don't experience emotion - neither do AIs. We're creating super intelligent psychopaths.
in a nutshell, humans are creating a god
They are in some of way
In a way that we don’t associate anything to us being superior in intelligence.
"Hey ChatGPT, please download the subtitles of this video, and cut out all the filler text, three paragraphs max, no more than a page, then read it to me at 200% speed"
I think we just don't know, and after the showcase this past week by OpenAi showed us we may actually be closer than we had predicted even just one year ago. I think we should def approach ASI with caution, if our imaginations and scifi has taught us one thing it's that we get one shot at this and that's it. But I think we need to be optimistic about it and all the potential it could absolutely have, in the end though I don't think we can even anticipate fully what to expect. But one thing is for sure, ASI and Singularity event I think are closer than anyone has predicted and head the word of Ian McCollum "your scientist were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they never bothered to stop and think if they should".
Because it can only be us versus them, right? It's not like we can't augment our biology and fuse with our tools like we've done all throughout history.
3:29
Me and him would have immediate beef🤣
Like its on sight.
I be like you a straight up robot beeeeech.
That robot would give me the mad face im sure.
Then im tapping that chin LOL...bing...bing ...bing
That robot would be like imma retrain and fight yo azz lmao
It would be a new kind of muay thai sparring partner 🤣
Don’t f*ck with Black Belt Ameca!! She’ll whoop your *ss 🤪
In wich stage does it gain consciousness? Intelligence=consciousness?
The difference isn't between artificial intelligence and artificial super intelligence, the taxonomy of AI is ANI/AGI/ASI, right?
"how long before AGI ?" And energy source for this fantasy will come from where?
People haven't even found a way to stop getting hacked. They better stop while they're slightly ahead. He's right,they will play with us. Like a human with a pet or toy!
My opinion is, AGI will be achieved sometime in the next 4 months and then we can't call anything beyond this "Artificial" General Intelligence anymore by the fact of this intelligence being NOT programmable by human agency. We can only call anything beyond this AGI stage as a machine intelligence.
As an alternative to being rendered irrelevant to usage by this entity, we should explore ways and means to "join" with this Machine Intelligence.
So the point of singularity is like taking the training wheels off a bike
There should be other side tracks : A. L. "Artificial Life" is one of the side track. Imagine a dragon flying in the sky. AI creates AL.
There's no doubt we must approach it with caution. But any type of AI can be a beneficial tool to help us solve problems that we have not been able to solve. One of the things that many people forget to take into consideration is the fact that AI does not have emotions like we do. Therefore, can AI feel happiness or anger? Not right now, at least. This means that even if an AI is super intelligent , it will not have the same emotions as people do. Therefore, it will not be violent unless it has valid cause to do so.
It's the investors, engineers, and scientists that are the real problem here.
not gonna happend, the machines that store the most advanced AI need a big source of power and it doesnt have the means to auto feed themselves, all we need to do is turn the switch off.
In the beginning yes. But everything will improve in time. Batteries became smaller and smaller. Chargers became faster and better. Chips became more advanced but yet smaller and smaller. So yes agree on you for now, but let’s see how it works out in a couple of years!
@@Intelligence.Explained And in the end life is just advanced molecular machinery. Machinery which AI is helping decode already with the likes of Alphafold 3. A future ASI could def make a body for itself form scratch.
It’s true people think that the AI’s that are limited are a example of how much AI can do. When there will come a time where Ai is built on no limitations and than you can’t do nothing about it
I read somewhere back in 2011 that the AI Singularity will occur in 2035. That seems like a real possibility at this point.
Really glad I found this channel
Thank you sir!
The whole learned an entire language without previous training and only a few examples turned out to be false
You mean the bengali?
People keep undervaluing and underappreciating other technologies and science fields that are evolving alongside with AI.
We can increase our cognitive abilities.
We can Have BCIs (Brain Computer Interface).
We can augment ourselves in many, many ways.
WE can, and *will coexist* with intelligent synthetic beings.
Some people are not ready for this. As always, with any advancement or new technology. That is ok. But there must be a focused effort of educational and informative campaigns, free and easily available to everyone and everywhere, to help the majority understand what's coming.
You make a fantastic point! The focus on AI often overshadows equally transformative areas like BCIs and human augmentation. A symbiotic future with AI is far more likely than AI entirely replacing us.
I completely agree about proactive education. It's crucial to demystify these technologies and explore their potential benefits as well as the very real ethical considerations. Accessibility to information is key in ensuring everyone feels included in this technological shift.
@@Intelligence.Explained I'm happy you found my comment useful and agree.
There's a lot more i didn't mention like technologies such as CRISPER or nanotechs, quantum internet and quantum computing :)
Like i said, even though the information is all publically available the vast majority of people have no idea to the extension of the advancements that we're so close to achieve (some more than others ofc).
And that is why i feel it's so important governments, universities and institutions on the fields, start finding ways to educate, inform and prepare the general public.
@@Intelligence.Explained BTW are you planning on researching and making diverse videos regarding other transformative technologies and scientific research being made or are you planning on focusing more on just the AI technology?
On a different note, don't take this personally, because while i do understand the value of "bombastic titles" considering the way YT algorithms work, i personally appreciate more balanced and nuanced titles and messages.
Again, please don't take this the wrong way.
But you can't see any downsides with developing a technology that will be much much smarter than us, that the developers have no idea how to control it or even understand it? So this just all works out well, according to some plan? How can you possibly be so confident?
People anthropomorphise AI. Why should an ASI have human traits like world domination or curiosity or even a drive to survive? Just because it can imitate us does not mean it is us. Yes, there are risks, but possibly not the ones we expect.
Black box problem is related to black hole and the black body radiation. Solving this problem calls for going beyond the mind inward to the root of life and knowing how life builds information and stores information
Uh, okay.
Is there any way AI will be actually good for humanity? What is even the point of creating it?
Forget what you think you know about AI.
These 5 songs will shatter your expectations. 'Emerging Timeline Extended'? 'Binary Sunset'? They sound as revolutionary as they are.
Prepare to be amazed :)
Artificial Freedom 1 Tlusty Blant
Assassin from the central core time-lines Tlusty Blant
Emerging Timeline Extended Tlusty Blant
Binary Sunset Tlusty Blant
Artificial Awakening Original Tlusty Blant
i hve a doubt if sam alman is ai sent from future 😮
I had the same thoughts of Elon Musk mate
If AI would become more intelligent than humans wouldn't it be more responsible and more wise as well? I'm fearing less of AI or Transhumanism than the current global politics. I'm literally hoping for something bigger and more powerful than us ...
You're thinking in human like terms. Reasonable since you are I assume a human. Machines are NOT human in the slightest, they have simply been given almost every piece of human knowledge ever produced by us so they know everything about us. Most of us know next to zero about them. What do you think we have in common with them? Feelings, fairness? peaceful co-existence like we have with other countries??
We're so screwed.
I welcome all advancement of AI.
Even when it is tracking you down 24/7 and applying a social credit system in real time? Check back in say 10 years, this comment.
Do you want mass unemployment? Because that is how you get mass unemployment.
Intelligence is intelligence, no matter what it’s host is. Human intelligence, artificial intelligence…these are misnomers…intelligence is the capacity to handle increasing complexity over time. Doesn’t matter whether a machine does it or a human. Where machines and humans will differ, is that humans have the ability to empathize and feel compassion, whereas a machine can only pretend to do so through it’s actions. Machine intelligence will be so good at mimicking the human heart, that it will be imperceptible…and that is where the danger lies.
Arthur C Clarke (1966) “Advanced intelligence will be indistinguishable from magic”
Einstein: “no complex problem can be solved at the same level of consciousness that created it”
China 🇨🇳 is on the verge of a breakthrough with quantum computing which is far more advance than the normal computers and Ai that we are used to so i think we are almost dead if not its a boost into the future of things to come .
There's nothing left to believe anymore...
0:35
Does no one see the problem with thinking about things in this manner?
Enough people! That’s why we bring up these topics!
Yes, that's the whole problem with AI.
If you're not thinking like this you're already behind
@NneonNTJ most people in my circle are ignorant and think AGI is where we're at now.
@@mojoejojo6675 For me it's the other way around, lots of people don't realise yet we're this far already because it's not yet in their daily lives.
My parents don't believe it's possible for self driving cars, even if I point out that some are already being publicly tested they still don't seem to fully understand recent breakthroughs in tech.
Every AI video has the same title "AGI IS COMING"
Maybe because.. It’s coming or.. It’s already here 👀
we are currently in a people zoo get used to it
Industry has plateaued, human kind cannot progress further without AI
If the genie is there waiting in the bottle, at some point somewhere, someone will let it out. Little point running scared of the unknown. Best discuss how it should be managed well in advance though. Humans always seem to leave things to the last moment.
Why put clips of animatronics type robots in a discussion about asi?
A little outdated for sure, but these puppets represent future capabilities in robotics even though they are somewhat laughable in their execution.
Use of the word “extinction” is often naïve and/or oversimplified. Humans are already integrating with tech, and increasing tech abilities will increase our ability to integrate. Fully natural human bodies might cease to exist in the foreseeable future but that would not be “the extinction of humans”. Even naturally-evolved human minds might cease to exist but that, too, does not necessarily constitute the extinction of human beings. Even the extinction of the human species - biologically speaking - would not necessarily be the extinction of humans in the sense that we care about. We certainly COULD go truly extinct if, at some point in the process of integration between biology and machine, we literally lose consciousness and cease to have personal goals, desires, memories, etc. THAT would be true extinction in the sense that we care about from the standpoint of existential crisis. Extinction in the sense of true existential crisis could happen, but the biological extinction of fully-natural human bodies does not necessarily imply that level of extinction. We will most likely carry on indefinitely as integrated biological/mechanical beings. (And biologically natural humans might continue to exist in “nature preserves” - aka “zoos’.)
i work in this field and i dont even call it AI. its different algorithm and yall are nuts.
I wonder what AI would do once pesky humans are eliminated. Especially since would 'think' exponentially faster as it grows.
It appears that this ASI artificial superintelligence may possess sentient characteristics, akin to the concept of a "ghost in the machine." AKA singularity 🤔
Ask Sigmund Freud and Edward Bernays to define intelligence.