OK, I will ask the dumb question. If it is too large and heavy to move AFTER it has been cut down to its present size how the heck did they get the raw stone there??
Because this site is probably 10,000 or more years old at a time when the Earth was different. Gravity itself was different. Gravity is an electromagnetic force, subject to redistribution of charge. They were able to lift and work these with greater ease. A great catastrophe occurred and the operation was interrupted as it was being tooled.
@@kimberlyboldt5213 What evidence do you claim supports the idea that the monolith is also 10ky old? The "site" age doesn't necessarily correlate with the age of the column.
@@JamesHawkeUA-cam Holly mother of the all maker you sir have the IQ of a sack of taters... God heavens mate ever heard of buoyancy? put an empty metal container in the tub and it floats because it has air... Jesus Christ humanity is fing doomed
Я вообще не верю официальной версии. Если объект был слишком тяжелым для транспортировки, как его можно было повернуть во время производства? И где карьер? Почему находитья этот объект такой глубокий? Было ли там приятнее работать? Вопросы о вопросах. Привет из Вены!
2:13 судя по сохранившимся ребрам которые видны на колонне, можно заключить, что отливалась колонна из полимерного бетона гашённой извести, методом опалубки, вероятнее всего сколоченной из длинных досок, Другой вопрос, с какой необходимостью её тут отливали, если перемещать её было бессмысленно?
Официальная наука говорит всё долбили зубилами и молотками и кирками этот гранит.. Но для меня вопрос а далее ? Даже в этом случае остались рёбра , а далее ? ещё долбить ? чтоб получить ровный цилиндр без рёбер, а как потом полировали до зеркального отражения ? как и чем ?
@@vlad9vt Не совсем понял вопроса? Мнение официальной науки не приговор, ибо далеко не всегда является истиной. И причём тут цилиндр? Допустим, все мощные дворцовые колонны делались не в монолите а из собранных цилиндрических блоков, которые в свою очередь выливались из полимерного бетона с гранитной крошкой, а то и вовсе собирались из кубических каменных блоков потом штукатурились и зашлифовывались. Что относительно шлифовки, это вообще не вопрос, естественно, были технологии и как правило не затейливые, истина в простоте.
@@user-Igor_RozenerQuella dei polimeri è una teoria che nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi è possibile scartare... Uno dei casi è proprio questo. Se il monolite è ancora nella cava di estrazione perché mai realizzarlo lì? Se usi una malta cementizia realizzi l'oggetto direttamente dove stai costruendo, così da non doverlo trasportare... In ogni caso in Perù è pieno di mura poligonali che erano addossati al fianco della roccia naturale. Su quelle stesse pareti, dove mancano i massi, è evidente il segno di dove erano precedentemente inseriti. La parete della montagna ha le stesse caratteristiche di levigatura e forma dei massi. Se fosse vera la teoria dei polimeri allora dovrebbero aver costruito anche l'intera montagna... un po' poco probabile non credi?
The question to me is .... Why? ... In the middle of nowhere. It looks like it done it a remote isolated area ... Why? .... Maybe because of the quarry perhaps. But then i have to ask ... Why did they leave it there? ...
The official version is given in the description of the video. Why did they leave it? There could be many reasons, the main one is financing. Or war, or change of power, etc.
who knows it ? true or not ? also i find there remains of ancient walls (looks like a very very old fortress) , but i try to find information what was there in past ? and no where i cannot find info what remains of long walls there - name of this fort ?
Within an industry there are trade secrets that even the janitor respects and adheres to , after all it benefits the group as a whole . The stone shaping transporting and actual quarrying of said stone is likely one of these industries.
now we know it can still be made, but not moved, like most of these huge stones are. Leaves us to wonder how the people of old did it ! We will probably never know.
А ведь до обработки, из породы его вынимали прямоугольного сечения!!!😮 он тогда весил почти в два раза больше чем сейчас- обработанный в цилиндр!! И официальные " историки" о таких мегалитах, умышленно умалчивают и утаивают!!
Incredible, not in our ability , even if they say so. Napoleon or anybody. Surroundings do not show even a quarrying source there about . Tell me why it’s there and where when it was cut fro where?
Just asking... ( I just saw another video on this ' pillar ') , but why does it look like and appear to be the same size as one of those cylindrical/cigar shaped UFOs that are being frequently filmed by witnesses recently worldwide? Is it a petrified organic /advanced ancient tech, inter stellar cylindrical craft that crashed in pre history? The crater it lies in looks suspicious too, did it fall out of the sky ? Is the surrounding landscape a quarry or the remains of an ancient, annilahted, petrified, megalithic site ? ..or dare I say it, a decimated Atlantean era sky craft factory ? Or is it just a pillar created when ..." There were giants in the earth in them days " These are not necessarily my beliefs, I'm only just asking questions and proposing possibilities
These things remain a mystery on purpose, father to son type stuff is what we are talking about . Where even a father might have his reasons for not handing down such info.
Если рядом не найдено никаких инструмнтов и механизмов то использовалась специальная методика долбёжки подобраным с земли камнем по скале, все учёные-историки это знают
5000 years ago they moved triple weight obelisk .2000 years ago they transported in Rome 2 obelisks of 500 tonnes each from egypt. U mean they was not able to move a 300 column? Ofc was possible. Only they quit the project for other reasons.
OK, I will ask the dumb question. If it is too large and heavy to move AFTER it has been cut down to its present size how the heck did they get the raw stone there??
Because this site is probably 10,000 or more years old at a time when the Earth was different. Gravity itself was different. Gravity is an electromagnetic force, subject to redistribution of charge. They were able to lift and work these with greater ease.
A great catastrophe occurred and the operation was interrupted as it was being tooled.
@@kimberlyboldt5213 gravity is a math theory that has never been proven. massive steel ships float and are not pulled to the sea floor.
@@kimberlyboldt5213 What evidence do you claim supports the idea that the monolith is also 10ky old? The "site" age doesn't necessarily correlate with the age of the column.
@@JamesHawkeUA-cam Holly mother of the all maker you sir have the IQ of a sack of taters...
God heavens mate ever heard of buoyancy? put an empty metal container in the tub and it floats because it has air... Jesus Christ humanity is fing doomed
@@kimberlyboldt5213..... just no... you probably believe the earth is flat..m
Vlad, brother you always have amazing things. Thanks 🙏🏽
Thank you, thanks for watching and for your good comment here !
Thank you so much vlad to keep doing all that, your contribution is so precious
Thank you
Thank you Vlad; you rock!
Thanks for watching this video, and for your comment
Merci Vlad encore une nouvelle decouverte pour moi. Pourtant je connais bien la Corse. 👍
Я вообще не верю официальной версии. Если объект был слишком тяжелым для транспортировки, как его можно было повернуть во время производства? И где карьер? Почему находитья этот объект такой глубокий? Было ли там приятнее работать? Вопросы о вопросах.
Привет из Вены!
Историк это как литератор, они фантазируют черпая из реальности какие то реальные факты и события так как это делают писатели
I'd love to see the lathe that faced the ends off
sharing ... hope all is ok there Vlad?
Thank you . yes , ok. we alive .
Amazing, thanks for showing!
I like to see you still posting been a follower since maybe 2010
Thank you ! Thanks for watching my videos and for your good comment here !
Спасибо за вашу работу.
Thank you for watching Спасибо
So how pyramid and balbek can be build
the biggest question - how ?
Someone had plan to take it somewhere after was made?
2:13 судя по сохранившимся ребрам которые видны на колонне, можно заключить, что отливалась колонна из полимерного бетона гашённой извести, методом опалубки, вероятнее всего сколоченной из длинных досок, Другой вопрос, с какой необходимостью её тут отливали, если перемещать её было бессмысленно?
Официальная наука говорит всё долбили зубилами и молотками и кирками этот гранит.. Но для меня вопрос а далее ? Даже в этом случае остались рёбра , а далее ? ещё долбить ? чтоб получить ровный цилиндр без рёбер, а как потом полировали до зеркального отражения ? как и чем ?
@@vlad9vt Не совсем понял вопроса? Мнение официальной науки не приговор, ибо далеко не всегда является истиной. И причём тут цилиндр? Допустим, все мощные дворцовые колонны делались не в монолите а из собранных цилиндрических блоков, которые в свою очередь выливались из полимерного бетона с гранитной крошкой, а то и вовсе собирались из кубических каменных блоков потом штукатурились и зашлифовывались. Что относительно шлифовки, это вообще не вопрос, естественно, были технологии и как правило не затейливые, истина в простоте.
@@user-Igor_RozenerQuella dei polimeri è una teoria che nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi è possibile scartare... Uno dei casi è proprio questo. Se il monolite è ancora nella cava di estrazione perché mai realizzarlo lì? Se usi una malta cementizia realizzi l'oggetto direttamente dove stai costruendo, così da non doverlo trasportare... In ogni caso in Perù è pieno di mura poligonali che erano addossati al fianco della roccia naturale. Su quelle stesse pareti, dove mancano i massi, è evidente il segno di dove erano precedentemente inseriti. La parete della montagna ha le stesse caratteristiche di levigatura e forma dei massi. Se fosse vera la teoria dei polimeri allora dovrebbero aver costruito anche l'intera montagna... un po' poco probabile non credi?
Wow ! It would be nice to see how flat and parallel the facets have been cut. Cool. :O)
Thanks for watching !
В школе нам твердили что мы произошли от обезьян и историю нам преподавали обезьянью и смотря на эту колонну я о щущаю себя маленькой шимпанзе.
loved seeing this awesome bro
Glad you enjoyed
Thank you for making. Namaste.
You are so welcome
how can this be solo?...did any if ya go a bit above to the place it could be fallen from to find more?
Super
Thanks for comment and for watching this video.
@@vlad9vt res
Respekt brother
How did they carve it using only a pizza slicer and a pasta strainer?
Long time since you popped up on my feed. What's the video with the Giger statues?
Вот как их уважать после таких официальных версий?..
Interesting!
Glad you think so!
This one is fascinating, honestly looks heavier than 300 Tons. I'm no expert though. Thanks for the video and time you put into your research :)
Vlad, how far from where it was quarried was it found, or is that not known?
it lies right on the site of the quarry. he was processed right there
The question to me is .... Why? ... In the middle of nowhere. It looks like it done it a remote isolated area ... Why? .... Maybe because of the quarry perhaps. But then i have to ask ... Why did they leave it there? ...
The official version is given in the description of the video. Why did they leave it? There could be many reasons, the main one is financing. Or war, or change of power, etc.
Merci :)
I think the official story of its creation is a big fat lie.
yup prob napoleon found it, wanted to make statue of it, cant not move it
who knows it ? true or not ? also i find there remains of ancient walls (looks like a very very old fortress) , but i try to find information what was there in past ? and no where i cannot find info what remains of long walls there - name of this fort ?
Within an industry there are trade secrets that even the janitor respects and adheres to , after all it benefits the group as a whole . The stone shaping transporting and actual quarrying of said stone is likely one of these industries.
They were an advanced society and had antigravity. Human true history has been hidden.
who knows it ? Need a time machine to check all !
Cool .
Thanks for watching !
Where are the carved faces!?
they must be on column
Faces as in sides.. Not literal faces.
The paint and rubber industries are two other such trades where you don't blabb all your secrets out to anybody willing to listen or record it .
OMG that is incredibly large
Not that old but hand crafted. They could not move it. 😱🤯😆
now we know it can still be made, but not moved, like most of these huge stones are. Leaves us to wonder how the people of old did it ! We will probably never know.
No temple or signs of buildings anywhere near????????
imagine they used wooly mammoths and woolly rhinos and giant sloths to move these huge stone pieces !
Who knows it ?
@@vlad9vt Ohhh man, I don't know anyone that old ! :)
А ведь до обработки, из породы его вынимали прямоугольного сечения!!!😮 он тогда весил почти в два раза больше чем сейчас- обработанный в цилиндр!! И официальные " историки" о таких мегалитах, умышленно умалчивают и утаивают!!
Incredible, not in our ability , even if they say so. Napoleon or anybody. Surroundings do not show even a quarrying source there about . Tell me why it’s there and where when it was cut fro where?
Just asking... ( I just saw another video on this ' pillar ') , but why does it look like and appear to be the same size as one of those cylindrical/cigar shaped UFOs that are being frequently filmed by witnesses recently worldwide?
Is it a petrified organic /advanced ancient tech, inter stellar cylindrical craft that crashed in pre history?
The crater it lies in looks suspicious too, did it fall out of the sky ?
Is the surrounding landscape a quarry or the remains of an ancient, annilahted, petrified, megalithic site ? ..or dare I say it, a decimated Atlantean era sky craft factory ?
Or is it just a pillar created when ..." There were giants in the earth in them days "
These are not necessarily my beliefs, I'm only just asking questions and proposing possibilities
Giants . . .
2:20 min. This is never granite. Napoleon the First? You mean Napoleon Bonaparte.
yes Napoleon Bonaparte
Влад! Если "кАНАЛ" это прямая кишка, все ровно кАНАЛ?
The questions you're not meant to ask...
These things remain a mystery on purpose, father to son type stuff is what we are talking about . Where even a father might have his reasons for not handing down such info.
Interesting, I did not know this existed. Oh, and what do people in the comments smoke? I want some.
It's a type of concrete not granite.
the official version say - it is a local granite
once he zooms in it's GG, WP vlad ty
Thanks for watching this video.
@@vlad9vt 🛐
Wow...hoh this marvel of history could be so unknown ?? Who or what did that ? No romans or greeks did that..impossible.
Dobry film, ale podkład muzyczny musiałam wyłączyć - katastrofa i masakra.
Если рядом не найдено никаких инструмнтов и механизмов то использовалась специальная методика долбёжки подобраным с земли камнем по скале, все учёные-историки это знают
Elephants in the room. Where was it quarried and how was it going to be transported to Ajaccio. I think the Napoleon story is false, local folklore.
Who knows & who knows it ? I always say- need a time machine to check all in past !
The, erosion on this Behemoth is indicative of being 100,000's of years,old.
5000 years ago they moved triple weight obelisk .2000 years ago they transported in Rome 2 obelisks of 500 tonnes each from egypt.
U mean they was not able to move a 300 column?
Ofc was possible.
Only they quit the project for other reasons.
How were they going to move this in the 18th century, please explain.
*Join the Enlightenment*
*Support Secular Humanism.*
Thank you, very interesting.
Il date de 1837.
Sooo langweilig!
Thanks for watching
It's biological. Watch mudfossil university.