DJI Pocket 3 as a Studio camera

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 177

  • @WORTHITORNOT
    @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +4

    You can get the Creator Combo here : amzn.to/49um7Xk

  • @SallyDiCreator
    @SallyDiCreator 8 місяців тому +9

    Thank you so much for this review! I want to shoot in-studio and travel content and have been on the fence about the pocket 3 and it's performance as a studio camera but this has given me confidence that it's the best camera, especially just starting out.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  8 місяців тому +1

      The Pocket 3 is a fantastic all around camera ! Glad this video helped

  • @RonaldBrown59
    @RonaldBrown59 Рік тому +10

    I think it looks fine for a studio camera. For the studio, audio is way more important than the video quality. As long as your in focus and well lit, most modern camera devices mounted will do a decent job. The Pocket 3 can be used for almost any video situation. Great video, and thanks for sharing.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +4

      I agree, audio is king and should never be overlooked

    • @alexzmixing
      @alexzmixing Рік тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT Just on that note, the audio of your video is a bit quiet, you can push it up for at least 8-10db. : )

    • @alexzmixing
      @alexzmixing Рік тому +1

      ​@@WORTHITORNOT GREAT VIDEO BTW!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      I always export audio at -12db and sometimes UA-cam will lower the volume even more.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Thank you, and thanks for watching !

  • @Tvj_films8452
    @Tvj_films8452 Рік тому +3

    Thank you for not having the music too loud when trying to hear you talk. Great review

  • @doctornebula
    @doctornebula 8 днів тому +1

    Great video and great voice for presenting.

  • @Visual_Notes
    @Visual_Notes Рік тому +10

    In this comparison, I think the image quality of the Sony ZV-E10 is much better than that of the Pocket 3 in terms of richness of detail. However, I think you can get even more out of the Pocket 3: in the standard setting, it tends to blur faces, which makes them look a bit muddy. It would be interesting to see a repeat of the comparison if you shoot with Pocket 3 in D-Log M, set sharpness and noise reduction to -2 and set sharpness to a pleasing level in post-processing.

    • @carasiaone
      @carasiaone Рік тому

      yep pls, I really think they could look close enough to each other

  • @brunoguerreiro5314
    @brunoguerreiro5314 Рік тому +2

    aiming to establish a personal brand, this is amazing. Take my example - I've been wanting to create my own personal brand for a while. I have a Sony A7RII, Studio light, and more. However, shooting videos on the camera, recording audio separately, syncing it in post-production, and adjusting the tripod for business calls is quite a hassle. But DJI provides a simple solution that eliminates all the friction. It's especially appealing for business owners like me who create business videos. I no longer need to put in the hard work to start shooting - I just need to shoot. The same goes for international travel - a lightweight case instead of a bulky backpack with lenses. Brilliant! ✌

    • @brunoguerreiro5314
      @brunoguerreiro5314 Рік тому +1

      Hey, just wanted to say I've been eagerly waiting for someone to review this part of the DJI before making a buying decision. @Worthitornot, thank you so much for taking the time to make that review! You've definitely gained a sub and supporter here!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Hey thank you for the kind words ! I truly appreciate it

    • @brunoguerreiro5314
      @brunoguerreiro5314 Рік тому +1

      Keep going bud! @@WORTHITORNOT 🙌

  • @JarrettTowe
    @JarrettTowe 10 місяців тому +4

    A big key to this mic is that the replacement cost is under 700$ for camera, extra battery mic, gimbal, lens. As someone who has had all of those stolen and/or broken...if your channel is about communication (as opposed to being about camera tech), this is just an unbeatable value.

  • @SoundSpeeds
    @SoundSpeeds Рік тому +8

    I wouldn't be against using the Pocket 3 for nearly all of my content creation.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      It’s really good Allen, just a bit pricey, but it can replace a lot of gear.

  • @LifeDIY
    @LifeDIY 11 місяців тому +5

    New subscriber! I am so happy you made this video as it was exactly what I was looking for. I create content and have had repeated issues with my Canon 90d and the settings and somehow even though it's in a studio and controlled environment, it seems like I'm having to fix all the settings every time I record, and it wastes a lot of time. So lately I've been using the DJI Pocket 2 to record some videos in my office, super quick and easy. I just bought the DJI Pocket 3 for the same thing, plus there's so much you can do with it if vlogging more than just recording in a studio. For people new to UA-cam content creation, these products will give you great sound quality and a very nice looking video.

  • @joshuafcenters
    @joshuafcenters 11 місяців тому +1

    I use it as much as my main cam and I love it. I did a video on it a couple weeks ago and the only issue ai had was learning how to color match with my sony a7iv. But I figured it out.

  • @theesamalexis
    @theesamalexis 11 місяців тому +4

    Thank you for making this video!

  • @jessbreheret
    @jessbreheret Рік тому +3

    Interesting... this is actually the first time that i see the Pocket 3 beeing so soft in a video. It sure can't defeat the combo full frame and great lens for studio setup but when on the move it's just a revolution ... most of the time what prevents me from beginning is the " grabbing a fullframe camera, choosing the lens, putting it on a gimbal, setting it up & beeing annoyed by the process " and then already not beeing motivated anymore. For simple facecam vlogs on the go it's just the new king imo.

  • @itsamodernmess
    @itsamodernmess 10 місяців тому +1

    Ahh this video is what I needed! I was thinking about getting both the OP3 and the Sony EV Z10 with a wide angle $50 attachment lens (will update a better lens later).
    No one is talking about this comparison except you!
    For some reason my intuition is telling me sony zv10 + (right now) $50 attachment for wide lens and the osmo for when I’m on the go. I don’t want to draw attention and think too much about stabilization. It also seems like you could use the osmo inside (“in studio) with that amazing auto tracking for some extra “b roll” while I’m also grabbing straight on footage from the sony…..
    Appreciate anyone’s input! I guess I should buy the OP3 first and see how I like it.

  • @ZoeyR86
    @ZoeyR86 10 місяців тому +1

    I like this as a studio cam with a mist filter and a bit tighter than this I use it with a nd4/8 filter and a mist indoor and keep the 180 rule

  • @ingwarmagn3393
    @ingwarmagn3393 Рік тому +12

    It seems to me that the OP3 has too much sharpness out of the box and too aggressive noise reduction, so detail suffers. This is why many content creators set their sharpening settings to -2 and noise reduction to -2.

  • @dizzycreates
    @dizzycreates Рік тому +3

    The Pocket 3 is softer for sure but it's not bad at all! Really looks good for what it is... an all around utility camera. My only concern is how durable it will be after a year of use. I got one and so far I really like it. It's great to just take it where ever you want and ensure you'll get good video.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Yes we definitely have to take some care in handling it, but a really good all around camera. Thanks for watching !

  • @MQ-lt7fd
    @MQ-lt7fd 5 місяців тому +1

    Thank You for this review. Helps a lot.

  • @theoldvideoguy
    @theoldvideoguy 7 місяців тому +1

    I have the same set up. ZVE 10 and Deville trucks 13 mm 1.4. Just a few more pennies in my piggy bank and I’m going to buy OP3. I like the shallow depth of field with Viltrox. But I see a lot of useful benefits for the OP3. Great review by the way, thanks.

  • @BusyFamilyFitness
    @BusyFamilyFitness 3 місяці тому +1

    I think the depth of field of the sony (or more precisely the lens’s) is a bit distracting in your studio setup. It is harder to see the neon light, and the subscribe pillows. The op3 looks sharp enough even without the background separation in my opinion. Also, one big thing you didn’t mention (or I missed it) is the monitoring/control capabilities of the op3 through the mimo app. It is one of the most useful things to have in this camera (at least for me). Even when I shoot something else, I just walk away a bit and use my phone to control the camera. And to be able to control EVERY setting is amazing. The playback is smooth and relatively high quality. In your studio setup (you are standing quite far from the camera) I guess this feature is gold🥰

    • @BusyFamilyFitness
      @BusyFamilyFitness 3 місяці тому +1

      Oh yeah, one more thing (against the zv-e10). If I’m right it can shoot up to 4k30…I think it is quite a big deal (shooting sports, or slow motion videos, etc). That was the other reason I did not go with the Sony. I love sony cameras though😅

  • @tiemji
    @tiemji 11 місяців тому +1

    Really liked the look of the op3. We can definitely see the difference but it's clearly not that bad

  • @theminimaljess
    @theminimaljess Рік тому +1

    I have been WAITING for someone to do a video like this and it’s perfect because I have a ZV-E10 I’m thinking about switching for the pocket 3. Thank you soooo much!!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      I'm glad it helped and thanks for watching !

    • @nimeshluhana4796
      @nimeshluhana4796 Рік тому +1

      hey, what did you do finally? I have two options here in the UAE, sony zv e10 with 16-50mm for 2100 AED and Dji pocket 3 standard for 1700 AED. I dont know if I should consider the portability or go for better details. Looking to shoot vertical content insta/fb/yt. and targeting college grads and parents.

    • @theminimaljess
      @theminimaljess Рік тому +1

      @@nimeshluhana4796 hi! I have decided to go with the dji pocket 3 as I am more comfortable with it all around. I had a lot more pros than cons when making my decision. I have my Sony ZV-E10 up for sale now! Hope this helps 😀

    • @nimeshluhana4796
      @nimeshluhana4796 Рік тому

      @@theminimaljess appreciate your response. Best Wishes! 🙂

  • @OutdoorWeekend
    @OutdoorWeekend Рік тому +1

    I got one DJI OSMO POCKET 3 and it's a very good camera.. 👍😎❤️

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes it is a very good camera. Thanks for watching !

  • @JimiCeleste
    @JimiCeleste Рік тому +2

    Great video! It looked so much better then then the ZV E10! Thank you . . .

  • @CountryLivingTenn
    @CountryLivingTenn Рік тому +3

    I think the Sony image looks crisper but without seeing the side by side, the Pocket 3 looks great. And the audio sounds very good

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes side by side there is a difference, but on its own it looks really good. Thanks for watching

    • @adrianmoss6355
      @adrianmoss6355 Рік тому +1

      Can you not sharpen the P3 in post?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes you can

  • @mhammer5
    @mhammer5 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the video Andre. Since I don't have any cameras beyond my phone which was my first in 2022 smartphone because my previous MIL SPEC flip phone could not be upgraded to 5G the only video cameras I do have is an old basic GoPro sealed battery unit from 2015 and a little video camera I bought at Christmas time, the $20 deal. In the upward dollar range my purchase would be at minimal Sony ZV-E10 to have what I see as a camera compared to the styles of GoPro, etc. If I already had a plethora of mirrorless cameras these action camera would be accessory units. I like the aspects of the action cameras you reviews and I learn a lot from your videos. For my to get one I want a camera like the Sony ZV-E10, etc first. Thanks and have a great weekend.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Thanks for your input ! There are many creators who just use a cell phone for their videos and it works just fine. Even with really bad video quality, as long as audio quality is good, many people will overlook the video. Thanks for watching and have a great weekend too !

    • @mhammer5
      @mhammer5 Рік тому +1

      Thanks. @@WORTHITORNOT

  • @jasonstclair4991
    @jasonstclair4991 Рік тому +1

    Nice Rolex. After watching this and your other videos on it, the Pocket 3 looks like an all around great camera.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes the Pocket 3 is really a great camera and I'm impressed. Regarding the watch, yeah, I'm a watch nut, got 58 watches lol 😆

  • @jorgem50
    @jorgem50 Рік тому +1

    Pocket 3 is incredible IMO. Low light it's ok but give it enough light and holy sh..it's amazing

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      I've been very impressed with it so far.

  • @gearadventures
    @gearadventures Рік тому +2

    Shooting in D log the footage is way better. The free DJI luts actually gives a great color correction base. I am not a big fan of its normal record mode colors.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Yeah the normal color mode is a big soft in this Studio environment and D-LogM would have been much better and the DJI LUT back to rec709 is a good overall LUT.

  • @ididitfinallythankyou
    @ididitfinallythankyou Рік тому +1

    Looks good in studio setup and it makes your face and skin softer compared to Sony ZV-e10. Somehow the neon sign is sharper Pocket 3.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes the Sony gives a much better bokeh hence why the sign looks blurred compared to the Pocket 3. Thanks for watching !

  • @pianopotato
    @pianopotato Рік тому +1

    The Sony ZVE10 locked off on a tripod is excellent for its price and looks at home with most other current mirrorless cameras. Where the Pocket 3 excels is in movement. In the studio, it is ok when given the very best conditions but still, looks similar, to most modern smartphones, if they are also given manual and best conditions.

  • @shiranmallikarachchi7820
    @shiranmallikarachchi7820 9 місяців тому +1

    Sony Zv can’t see the subscribe word clearly behind you but osmo pocket 3 yes

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  9 місяців тому +4

      That's because the Sony has a 13mm Prime lens on it with a 1.4 aperture giving it the wanted blurry background/depth of field

  • @zubairhumsafar
    @zubairhumsafar Рік тому +1

    Currently some users having issues with pocket 3 flip. Flip is not durable so be careful in advance. Check the UA-cam videos with problems people facing in osmo p3

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому

      I have seen a few videos of the screen issues, I have an idea/speculation of what caused this issue and will mention it in a future video. Considering that thousands have been sold in the 1st few days shows this as an isolated issue.

  • @SunriseWaterMedia
    @SunriseWaterMedia Рік тому +1

    I like the shallow depth of field on your Sony, but the pocket looks great!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Yes the Sony has a more pleasing image, but the Pocket 3 does real good in a lot of areas

    • @gbej1
      @gbej1 8 місяців тому +1

      You can adjust the settings in the Pocket 3 or shoot in D-Log and you will be hard pressed to be able to different the outcome from the Sony.
      As a novice to filming and video editing I initially just used the Pocket 3 in all its default setting, then I watched some UA-cam videos and I adjusted my settings and I was pleasantly surprised at the outcome, even when I filmed in normal mode

    • @SunriseWaterMedia
      @SunriseWaterMedia 8 місяців тому

      @@gbej1 Nice!

  • @bobsinclair2216
    @bobsinclair2216 Рік тому +1

    Looks good for what it is, but for the best quality, a Super 35 or Full Frame can’t be beat. Cheers

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      I can agree with that. Thanks for watching

  • @germansausage499
    @germansausage499 Рік тому +1

    Great video sir

  • @Ninjadom
    @Ninjadom Рік тому +1

    Rolex Submariner Two-Tone 16613LN. I see you!!😊❤😊

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Haha, I love watches, maybe a bit too much as I have 58 watches. 😆

  • @lapeladetrasdelexito2690
    @lapeladetrasdelexito2690 Рік тому +1

    Great video. But, do you know if I could connect the osmo pocket 3 to the rodecaster pro and record video with the audio form the rodecaster pro?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +3

      I don't know as I don't have the RODEcaster Pro, sorry

  • @gordon3988
    @gordon3988 Рік тому +1

    Looked quite good I thought…I actually prefer the sharpness though it somewhat reminded me of a iPhone. My guess you might be able to mitigate somewhat, but I don’t know. Colors popped, maybe too much. It didn’t have quite the background blur, but personally I’ve never thought that was needed in the studio. Nice job! Btw Markuspix had some adjustments to sharpness etc that he recommended on his last video; but you have to skip nearer to the end (beginning is somewhat of a joke on purpose).

  • @MikeReyher
    @MikeReyher 6 днів тому +1

    Are you in Grapevine? I live half a mile from that train station.

  • @RealPoliticsOfAmerica
    @RealPoliticsOfAmerica 5 днів тому +1

    Good lord!!!! So many OPTIONS. WHAT IS THE BEST SOLUTION FOR TIKTOK Live streaming? Without spreading $3,000. Good audio excellent video. Running on a desktop. Any help?

  • @SonnyBCreative
    @SonnyBCreative Рік тому +1

    Are you shooting in auto or pro mode with custom settings? perhaps its possible to get a better image out of the pocket 3? its doing some cellphone type post processing

  • @AfricaMan44
    @AfricaMan44 Рік тому +4

    The Pocket 3, although a bit too sharp, looks better than the Sony.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for your input !

    • @adz-ql6kv
      @adz-ql6kv Рік тому +1

      the simple black mist filter would turn down the sharpness. although right out of the box it's pretty sharp. new firmware allows you to adjust the sharpness a noise.

    • @PradeepKumar-tq4ev
      @PradeepKumar-tq4ev 9 місяців тому

      ​​@@adz-ql6kvhow to adjust sharpness. I mean what settings do I need to lower r change. Sry im new to camera world 😅

    • @adz-ql6kv
      @adz-ql6kv 9 місяців тому

      just look for pocket 3 sharpness settings on youtube.@@PradeepKumar-tq4ev

  • @boblovestofish6793
    @boblovestofish6793 Рік тому +1

    This looks like a really nice camera Andre, but for my needs, an action camera is better for fishing.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yup, I’d worry about it getting wet etc. I’ve seen a lot of fishing channels use an action camera

  • @Richard_FitPku
    @Richard_FitPku 3 місяці тому +1

    Can the fluffy thing come off the mic for when your doing a talk gbead video indoors?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  3 місяці тому +2

      @@Richard_FitPku Yes it can be removed

  • @robertf57
    @robertf57 6 місяців тому +1

    What is that thing called that you use to hang the DJI mic around your neck? I like that better than trying to clip it to your collar. Thanks!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  6 місяців тому +2

      Magnetic pendant

    • @robertf57
      @robertf57 6 місяців тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT Thanks for your quick reply!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  6 місяців тому +1

      @@robertf57 My pleasure

  • @northcountryscenes9872
    @northcountryscenes9872 Рік тому +2

    I’m really on the fence about the P3. My biggest concern is build quality and how long will-can it last. Thanks for the video Andre

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +6

      Totally understand, but my original Pocket 1 from 4 years ago is still working great.

    • @philsgarage64
      @philsgarage64 Рік тому +4

      I had the Pocket 1 & 2 (and now the 3) for years, and they are still there working perfectly. Of course it’s a bit more fragile than a compact, but put a compact on a gimbal and you’ll have also a fragile setup if it falls down. If you worry about it, I recommend to have a look to “Scotty makes stuff” they make solid protection for the Pockets.

    • @The_Blue_Collar_Gent
      @The_Blue_Collar_Gent Рік тому +2

      Also dji care on the OP3 is like $30 for a year pretty cheap imho

  • @hbhavsi
    @hbhavsi 10 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for the video. I dont see a final conclusion of the Pocket 3 video on your channel yet. Just curious if you'd be putting it out?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  10 місяців тому +2

      Yes I will be doing a final conclusion of the Pocket 3 within the next week. I just wanted to really test it in some extreme conditions and using it in different scenarios over a period of time to make sure I tested in thoroughly

    • @hbhavsi
      @hbhavsi 10 місяців тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT Great, thank you!!

  • @adz-ql6kv
    @adz-ql6kv Рік тому +1

    while it isn't as good as a mirrorless camera it's "almost" as good. and factoring in a tight budget this makes it the perfect on the go video camera setup. or arguably, the best in its class before you start spending megabucks on professional gear ⚙️.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes, getting all the required gear together can add up fast. Thanks for watching !

  • @mylifeisbroken34
    @mylifeisbroken34 10 місяців тому +1

    Hello sir. I want to use Osmo Pocket 3 as a webcam for Twitch live streams. Do I have any problems with long-term use? What are your suggestions?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  10 місяців тому +1

      I have not had the Pocket 3 long term, but no issues so far.

  • @breeze9248
    @breeze9248 Місяць тому +1

    how do you get sharp background on dji? Mine is always blurry...

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Місяць тому +2

      It depends on how far away the background is

    • @breeze9248
      @breeze9248 Місяць тому

      @@WORTHITORNOT mine is about 2m away and the camera 1m away from me. I feel like here you have the same distance. How should I fix this?

  • @AprilClayton
    @AprilClayton 8 місяців тому +1

    How do you record stereo from mic ? Mine defaults to mono. I have to fix it in Davinci. It will only play in one ear.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  8 місяців тому +1

      Are you using the internal recording or the recording sent to camera?

    • @AprilClayton
      @AprilClayton 8 місяців тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT recording from pocket 3 camera. The setting only allows mono, which I now realize is normal. But I was confused when my UA-cam video I made played only in my left air pod. I then changed the audio to stereo in Davinci and it played in both AirPods. When I listened with headphones while editing, the audio seemed to play in both ears with mono, but not AirPods.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  8 місяців тому

      @@AprilClayton weird

  • @cameraguy2128
    @cameraguy2128 Рік тому +1

    Humm, personally for me this is a novelty item and I agree the video and audio is good, but its form factor is not what I would consider professional, but that’s just me.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yeah the Pocket 3 is not for everyone for sure, but I personally think it’s a very powerful little camera. Thanks for watching

  • @ItsWhatIDo
    @ItsWhatIDo Рік тому +1

    I don't think it holds up to the ZV-E10. But that doesn't really surprise me. The ZV-E10 has a lot bigger sensor and image processor and I've been impressed with the image quality from that. However that being said I think the Pocket 3 is very good for all the reasons you listed and if you want a good vlogging set up then it ticks all the boxes. If you saw the footage on it's own then you would be quite impressed with it. But up against the ZV-E10..... I think a fairer comparison would be up against the GoPro and the Osmo Action 4

    • @veryboringname.
      @veryboringname. Рік тому +1

      To be fair the point was to see if it could double up as a studio camera, so it should be compared to a camera that you'd find in a UA-cam creator's studio (who isn't MKBHD or LTT).
      If we're talking purely camera comparisons then it can be compared to Sony's ZV-1 series which has the same size sensor as the Osmo Pocket 3.

    • @SonnyBCreative
      @SonnyBCreative Рік тому

      same sensor size but processing is completely different

    • @veryboringname.
      @veryboringname. Рік тому

      @@SonnyBCreative Yes, that would be the point of a comparison.

    • @ItsWhatIDo
      @ItsWhatIDo Рік тому +1

      @@SonnyBCreative I thought you had got that completely wrong until I realised you meant the ZV 1. Yes a comparison to the ZV 1 would be fair. I don't have one of those so I can't make a first hand comment on the quality. I do understand the point Andre was making though. As an 'all in' solution the Pocket 3 is a good choice but you will sacrifice some image quality in low or indoor lighting. If you wanted a pure studio camera you are ignoring or negating the Pocket 3's other advantages and may be better to choose an APSC camera.

  • @JWNRW59
    @JWNRW59 6 місяців тому +1

    Make the battery removable/replaceable.

  • @jeffwinters8152
    @jeffwinters8152 Рік тому +1

    sony zv 3 10 compared to the pocket 3 the only main thing is see is the sony image quality looks better besides that i do not see much of a difference between the two

    • @adz-ql6kv
      @adz-ql6kv Рік тому +1

      I keep looking at the worth it or not neon sign on the wall noting the differences between both images. and a lot of that can be fixed with a "black mist" filter to soften it up. probably 1/8 would be enough.

  • @DFWMoose
    @DFWMoose Рік тому +1

    Interesting thoughts.
    The FOV is a little narrower on the Sony? Or is it just me.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Yes it is a bit narrower on the Sony even with the Viltrox 13mm lens is because of the APSC crop, plus the additional crop when recording 4K@30.

    • @gametime4316
      @gametime4316 Рік тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT I hope the ZV-E10M2 will be something like A6700 stripped down the EVF, mechanical shutter and cheaper frame and maybe even the IBIS for 800-900$
      so we will get 4K30&60 without crop and 4K120 with, 10bit, and only 1.1 crop for EIS... (and 4K30 "webcam")

  • @profdiniz
    @profdiniz 9 місяців тому +1

    It's decent for a low budget production but the difference in quality is not even close in my opinion.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  9 місяців тому +1

      Indoors I agree, but outdoors with plenty of light, the Pocket 3 has a fantastic image quality

    • @profdiniz
      @profdiniz 9 місяців тому +1

      Sure! Absolutely. I was commenting on the studio thing hehehe. Pocket 3 is a best considering the price@@WORTHITORNOT

  • @scottnadeau5280
    @scottnadeau5280 Рік тому +1

    and now people are having that screen not turning or snapping back or getting stuck 1/2 way

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Interesting, I’ve only seen one video of that when he 1st turned it on out of the box. Wonder if there will be more people having screen issues.

    • @Everyonehasanopinion
      @Everyonehasanopinion Рік тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOTI’ve only seen one case of that problem as well… some man retired in the Philippines if I remember correctly. I have the pocket 1 and 2 but seldom used them; really liking the pocket 3 so far though; can see myself finding lots of use with this one. Thanks Andre for posting these videos!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +3

      @@Everyonehasanopinion I also have the Pocket 1 and still works great after these past 4 years, but this Pocket 3 is so much better in so many ways. Thanks for watching and commenting !

  • @StirfriedGerman
    @StirfriedGerman Рік тому +2

    Haha it looks cartoonish ! You could probably get away with the OP3 in a studio setting with lots more light, but you'd want to wear sunglasses. DJI are not selling the wireless mic separately, I think they should because a lot of us don't mind to sync audio in post... even though I still think that the Boya XM6 still sounds a little better.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Yeah that Boya is hard to beat. I "think" DJI will release these wireless mics as I like you, don't mind syncing in post like I did here as all the audio was from the internal 32bit recording from the wireless mic.

    • @StirfriedGerman
      @StirfriedGerman Рік тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT actually I found some "second hand" from people who bought the creator kit and don't use them. Can you setup, record and download the audio files straight on a single mic without receiver, OP3 or charging case?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      @@StirfriedGerman Yes just turn on the transmitter, then hit the record button and when finished, stop recording, turn off transmitter and plug in a USB-C cable capable of data transfer and you’ll see a folder open on your computer with a .wav file. Transfer to computer and delete file from transmitter folder.

    • @StirfriedGerman
      @StirfriedGerman Рік тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT Lol thanks, that was fast. Indeed I just read the manual, even firmware update is possible with the USB-C port.

    • @StirfriedGerman
      @StirfriedGerman Рік тому +1

      I might get one, about $50

  • @cheesegrits196
    @cheesegrits196 Рік тому +17

    Main difference...... how much the Sony costs.

  • @TRunner4
    @TRunner4 3 місяці тому +1

    Personally I don't think the OP3 is fully focused on you. Seems the letters over your head are in much better focus than you. As the Sony is focused on you and the letters are out of focus. Wish you would have gotten that focus correct to make the true comparison.

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  3 місяці тому +1

      Well the Pocket 3 is further away from me than a normal vlog situation and the Sony has a larger image sensor and lens has a f/1.4 aperture, bigger than the Pocket 3's f/2.0.
      Regarding getting the focus correct, they were both in auto focus, but the difference that you notice is what I mentioned in the previous sentence. Hope that helps

    • @TRunner4
      @TRunner4 3 місяці тому

      @@WORTHITORNOT I guess in all the research I have done, I have seen different results. Like getting the PS3 to lock on to you and not just in plain auto focus. Yes, it is not a pro level lens quality, but I have seen much better footage that shows sharp focus. Also were you shooting in 4K?

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  3 місяці тому +1

      @@TRunner4 Yes both were shooting 4K@30

  • @briandolson2941
    @briandolson2941 Рік тому +1

    Don't make me spend more money Andre!

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Who me ? Affiliate links in the pinned comment lol

  • @rezjrprod
    @rezjrprod 7 місяців тому +1

    I see people trying to use it as a studio camera and it's seriously unwatchable.. It's main purpose is not for the studio and it shows the digital noise is prominent and it makes it almost unwatchable it's very muddy

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  7 місяців тому +2

      But for those on a budget and can't afford multiple cameras, this can work IMO. Thanks for the comment

    • @rezjrprod
      @rezjrprod 7 місяців тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT that I agree with 100%.. for its actual purposes it's great.. One thing I found is there's extreme banding in blue skies which is a common problem but the sensor just can't handle it.

  • @finality4795
    @finality4795 Рік тому +1

    only 9 megapixels, at least 12 would have been nice

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +1

      Well for achieving better low light they went with lower megapixels but 9MP is still okay as you need a 8MP for good 4K

  • @cashmoney2159
    @cashmoney2159 Рік тому +1

    But why isn't it having the Bokeh effect in the indoor conditions of your room??

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      The distance of the Pocket 3 to me is why, if it were closer it would have bokeh

  • @Richard_FitPku
    @Richard_FitPku 3 місяці тому +1

    Shame it's not waterproof

  • @oddballmedia
    @oddballmedia Рік тому +1

    fstop is a bit different here. sooooo. Still Sony looks way better

    • @WORTHITORNOT
      @WORTHITORNOT  Рік тому +2

      Yes the Viltrox lens can go to a f1.4, but I set it to a f2.0 so it would be fair. The Viltrox paired with the Sony definitely give more background separation. Thanks for watching !

    • @gametime4316
      @gametime4316 Рік тому +1

      @@WORTHITORNOT u should have set it to F2.9-3 to get the same DOF as the pocket 3.
      zv-e10 have 1.5 crop for the APS-C and extra 1.23 crop at 4k30, that ends up at 1.85 crop. with a 13MM lens at F2.0 u get 24MM F3.7 full frame equivalent.
      pocket 3 have 2.7 crop (1") so its F stop equivalent is 5.4 and the focal we know its 20MM.
      that is why the pocket looks wider and with less DOF :)

  • @AbdullahJirjees
    @AbdullahJirjees 7 місяців тому +4

    First impression, the background is much better look with the pocket 3, your face is much better with sony ZV-E10

  • @RealPoliticsOfAmerica
    @RealPoliticsOfAmerica 5 днів тому +1

    Good lord!!!! So many OPTIONS. WHAT IS THE BEST SOLUTION FOR TIKTOK Live streaming? Without spreading $3,000. Good audio excellent video. Running on a desktop. Any help?