Why you are crying? Manipur mess was created by your family only. Now things 5:19 are moving in right direction slowly. If we accept you view, The atrocities created Church and you religion in America,Africa and Australia to the own inhabitants difficult to imagine.They destroyed everything and imposed a fake religion which just opposite what Jesus was propogated.
Keep up the good work, Prakhar. Everyone needs to be heard. We have already gone too far with the Marxist view of history. Now, it's time to appreciate the differing scholarly views and Dr. Sampath is one brilliant intellectual doing the job. 👍🏼
@Robert Clive the founder of India andhnamazi be like:- saaar Indians hindus coming to London saar..our women are being taken by strong masculine hindus saar😭😭 we can't do anything saaar..we shall again conkaar India saar😤
wow man, your channel is a good example of what we call "darbari historians". Please contact romila thapar and gang you belong in that gang please join them there're loose members (and respect) anyways
@Robert Clive the founder of India wow man, your channel is a good example of what we call "darbari historians". Please contact romila thapar and gang you belong in that gang please join them there're loose members (and respect) anyways
I just come from Beerbiceps podcast of Vikram Sampath because UA-cam recommended it. The difference between this host and Ranveer is huge. Prakhar knows what he is talking and gives his own opinions, questions and carry the conversation forward in a meaningful way. Whereas Ranveer just ask questions and does interviews in the name of podcast. When it comes to his opinions, he resorts to conspiracy theories, predictions and fantasy. He would bring aliens and spirits into a conversation of economics and political science! Anyway, I think I am gonna read his book. Great content.
This is such an interesting conversation. This channel needs to grow 10 times bigger. Good work brother. And if you read this, please try to bring J Sai Deepak and talk about his new book India Bharat and Pakistan.
Listening to Prakhar first time but listened to Dr Sampath couple of times. What a conversation?!?! Omg! Enjoyed it thoroughly to know our beautiful past thru this discussion. Sampath is really great in providing the account in the midst simple way. Hats off to you both. Keep it up with such podcast to bring out our true history to surface.
Dr. Vikram Sampat is a legend. Anyone who's challenging the inferiority complex and British/Islamic Glorification by the 20th century Historians. More power to you sir and thanks for inspiring the future Historians of the country who will truthfully present our rich history, knowledge & culture and not be bullied and forced to comply with the self hating leftists and their hold on the higher education appratus
Dr.Vikram Sampaths an intelligent stimulation. Though I am beginning to hear these now(87yrs) yet I am thrilled. In my days we were prescribed in school curriculum history of Mazumdar. I fave some knowledge of those. Since I am science stud Bot I have no word to thank Dr VS narration.
धर्मार्थ-काम-मोक्षाणाम्, उपदेश-समन्वितम् पूर्व-वृत्त-कथा-युक्तम् इतिहासं प्रचक्षते dharmārtha-kāma-mokṣāṇām, upadeśa-samanvitam pūrva-vṛtta-kathā-yuktam itihāsaṃ pracakṣate Ancient Indian history begins with Brahma, the founder of Vedic sciences, and his son Svāyambhuva Manu, the first king of the Brahmāvarta kingdom. A few kings and kingdoms may have existed before the lifetime of Brahma but the official recordkeeping of the genealogy of Indian kings and their history commenced from Brahma and his son Manu. Traditionally, the Sūtas and the Magadhas were entrusted with the task of maintaining this multigenerational chronological genealogy of the Manu and the Puru dynasties, charting their lineages since the early Rigvedic period. Though the two communities pursued their ancestral duty with utmost dedication, it was never a feasible expectation to maintain this continuity for thousands of years, which is perhaps why there are some gaps in the chronological genealogy of various dynasties. These historical records had been formally compiled into Purāṇa-Itihāsa Saṁhitās for the first time by Veda Vyāsa’s pupil Romaharṣaṇa Sūta, during the later Rigvedic period. After this, the subject of Purāṇa-Itihāsa formally became a part of Vedic education and the pupils of Romaharṣaṇa Sūta also compiled Purāṇa Saṁhitās. The tradition of periodic compilation of Bhaviṣyat Purāṇa was introduced in the post-Vedic period. Then, the same Purāṇa Saṁhitās were recompiled in Laukika Sanskrit later, and came to be known as Purāṇas. It seems that the tradition of historical recordkeeping declined after the reign of the Ikśvāku King Agnivarṇa, the 25th descendant of Sri Rāma. Kālidāsa abruptly ended his Raghuvaṁśa Mahākāvya after the reign of Agnivarṇa, probably due to a long interregnum in genealogical continuity of the Raghu dynasty. Evidently, the Ikśvāku dynasty had declined after the reign of Agnivarṇa. Vyāsa, of the Mahābhārata era, revived the tradition of the study of Purāṇas and recompiled them into eighteen Purāṇas. Some Upapurāṇas were also compiled after the Mahābhārata era. The Purāṇas available to us, it seems, were finally recompiled and updated around 500-100 BCE. This revived Puranic tradition survived till the Gupta period. Only Bhaviṣyat Purāṇa continued to be periodically updated after the Gupta period. Purāṇas narrate the continuous genealogical and chronological history of ancient India, starting from the Mahābhārata war, and the coronation of King Yudhiṣṭhira, and ending at the Gupta period. All Indian traditional and literary sources unanimously indicate the date of the Mahābhārata war to be in the 32nd century BCE and epigraphic evidence of the Aihole inscription1 conclusively establishes the date of the Mahābhārata war in 3162 BCE. Purāṇas refer to the Saptarṣi calendar that commenced around 6777 BCE, assuming the hypothetical position of Saptarṣis (the Big Dipper) in Aśvinī Nakśatra. Accordingly, Purāṇas, Vṛddhagarga and Varāhamihira, and other ancient scriptures unambiguously mention that the Saptarśis were in Maghā Nakśatra around 3177-3077 BCE, during the reign of King Yudhiṣṭhira. A reconstructed land grant of King Janamejaya, son of Parīkśit, was found in Tirthahalli district of Karnataka, which is dated in the 89th year of the Yudhiṣṭhira era (3073-3072 BCE). So, Purāṇas relate the complete genealogies of various dynasties of Magadha Empire after the Mahābhārata war. We also have sufficient epigraphic evidence starting from the reign of King Aśoka. Thus, we can factually and accurately establish the chronological history of ancient India from the Mahābhārata war (3162 BCE) to modern times. The tougher challenge is to establish the chronology of ancient India beyond the date of the Mahābhārata war. Traditionally, Purāṇas follow the timeline of Chaturyuga cycle for narrating the chronological history of ancient India - however, the timeline of Chaturyuga cycle had been revised and enlarged during the post-Vedic and the post-Rāmāyaṇa eras with an objective to achieve accurate astronomical calculations in whole numbers, because ancient Indian astronomers preferred to work with whole numbers instead of odd fractions. Unfortunately, the original Purāṇa Saṁhitās written by Romaharṣaṇa Sūta and his pupils, the earliest versions of Purāṇas, have been lost long ago. In fact, it seems even the Rāmāyaṇa and the Mahābhārata have been recompiled during the Śātavāhana-Gupta period. The available versions of Purāṇas, and the Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata relate numerous legends of the Vedic and post-Vedic period and also provide the genealogical information of various dynasties and lineages starting from the time of Vaivasvata Manu. Since the later timeline of Manvantaras and Chaturyugas consisted of the cycles of millions of years, it has been assumed that the great rishis and kings will be reborn in the beginning of Vaivasvata Manvantara. This may be the reason why the updaters of Purāṇas give almost all genealogies starting from the time of Vaivasvata Manu though they have propounded the beginning of the chronological history of ancient India from Svāyambhuva Manu. This contradictory assumption led to some chronological inconsistencies in the narratives of various genealogies as well as certain misplaced identifications of historical personalities with identical names. One of the biggest mistakes committed by the Puranic updaters is the misidentification of Veda Vyāsa of Rigvedic era as Vyāsa of the Mahābhārata era that led to the concocted concept of twenty eight Vyāsas and the impossible theory of eight chirajīvins. The later timeline of millions of years also misled the Puranic updaters to assign 60000 years to King Sagara and 11000 years to King Rāma and suchlike. The popularity of Adbhuta Rasa in Sanskrit poetry and drama, and the poetic exaggeration of narratives, had gradually transformed the historical legends into historico-mythological legends. These problems in the ancient Indian historiography led to the colonial notion that ancient Indians had no sense of history and lacked historical consciousness.
In Sanatana, Itihasa has been written in poetic form illustrating all the rasas, so that consumers of Itihasa emotionally connect to the story and can retrieve even if the source of stories are destroyed. That's why unless you read the text with Shraddha and Titiksha you won't be able to experience it.
Bro please be the voice for our history every single person doesn't have time to invest and find truth on our own, we are searching for the content like this, we want history content more..(Indic side of history)
This is an uber fab podcast, you asked such good & different thought provoking questions which Vikram answered in his very unique style & his deep,profound knowledge which makes our minds tick.Nobody explains effects of colonisation as well as Vikram does, Love how objective he is,He is so right in explaining why a traumatic past needs healing and its relation to current politics. You were v right in ur reasons in putting those Indian americans back in thier place.Such a shame these leftist historians need to be held to account for providing false fabricated evidences.Excellent podcast thank you 👍
It means indian brains r superior than modern computer. The way vedas were memorized, such technique must b teach to modern indian students. M very interested to learn ancient Indian method of memorizing.🙏
@Robert Clive the founder of India meenakshi jain has documented all the incidents of sati and analyzed it. She has been awarded Padma Shri for her research. She is above all the chomilas and chaRaS sharmas.
@India a failed State every village had Sati ~ gore ki jh@at ka keeda. Chomilas aur charas Teri tarah kuch keede hai jo ICHR me baith kar ncert likhne hai
@India a failed State tu Kitna zyaada dillusion me jee rha hai ki tujhe basic ncert bhi nahi pta, think about this first then think about USA and gori jh@t
Great work mr Prakhar. More Young minds like you should promote forgotten history, facts about barbarians. You people can sync with younger lot. Make them feel proud. You, keerti, Ranveer (TRS) deserve appreciation. Listening to great minds such as Vikram, sai Deepak is a feast to eyes and ears. God bless you
Prakhar this might be the best interview Sampath has done, at least in the terms of input from the interviewer & visuals. You might not get the views ‘views’ but I have seen most of youtube & your channel might be one of the best channels out there in terms of content growth. KEEP UP THE WORK, BEHEN PARIWAR MAACHDENGE❤❤
I like this dude. He seems genuine and has the balls to call a spade a spade, unlike today's jingoism and everything-in-the-past-was-glorious narrative. In the world full of abhijeet chavdas be a vikram sampath.
Dharma(righteousness) and adharma (wrong) always co-existed in society. Bharat,China,Persia,Egypt, Greece all them do have a glorious past and that of course doesn't not mean everything was perfect.
When you can't handle facts because of your indoc trination you call it Jingoism, India's Hindu past was definitely glorious, anti nationals like you can't handle this fact, obviously glorious Hindu past wasn't perfect, Abhijit Chavda is actually telling the truth which you can't handle. Don't try to portray that you aren't biased by supporting Vikram, you are leftist para site and will remain so. Vikram doesnt know that Marxists are the ones who definitely mani pulated Indian history.
Indians set most knowledge to poetry as it was very easy to memorise what was chanted or sung. Many words for each object (prabhakar, bhaskar, surya etc) is not arbitrary but recognises subjectivity in perception. Depending on whether the Sun is seen as 'bright' or full of rays, etc, the names differed The idea of one objective truth in science is rooted in Abrahamic idea of one objective Truth & God. Indans always recognised subjectivity. Ekam Satyam. Viprah Bahuda Vadanti.
Bhakti ras or devotional elements has been added over time to scriptures, much in last millenia. So many things that you may read as itihasa may not be exactly how the orignally author would have composed. The poetic element is always there. For example Shri Rama is described as a Human being by Maharishi Valmiki (not in the 1st & last khand which are a later additions).
This needs to be researched either By Dr Prakhar Guta or Dr Vikram Sampath: 1. Mr. Gopalswamy, son of first Indian principal of Guindy Engineering college,studied engineering in Germany before start of WW II. Electronics was the subject 2. Joined Siemens and played part in setting up Lord Haw Haw with German SS. 3. Negotiated with Germans on behalf of Subash Chandra Bose the protocol to be adopted between INA officers and German army officers. 4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Haw-Haw 5. He was shifted to Malaya by submarine before being captured by the British
Really wonderful informative discussion between you, Prakhar & Vikram. But, there is a bit of correction needed- the Ahoms came from Burma (present day Myanmar, and not Chinese). In fact Su-Ka-Phaa was a Burmese noble who molded his own Burmese culture with the local Assamese(Oxomiya) Santana culture to give rise to the present Oxomiya culture. Also, Vaishnavism in Manipur was introduced by Shantidas Gosai from Sylhet to King Pamheiba of Manipur in the 17th century.
It's just my own opinion but the bar below which shows the duration of one question... It's very distracting. I couldn't look at the video because I was focused on seeing the bar move. Again, this is my personal opinion that we should not have that bar again. BTW, this video was very informative.
In India scientific interpretation of history was actually started as early as early 20th century. Men who led such were - Jadunath Sarkar, RC Majumder, Rakhal Das Banerjee etc(most of them from Bengal). But from 1960s things started changing , they were soon replaced by a historians who were influenced by "Marxist Historiography " and oy they are popular and taught today. We need to restart our "Scientific interpretation of History " and abolish Marxist Historiography. Dr. BR Ambedkar had positive views regarding Marx and also stressed the fact that Marxists are ignorant when it comes to understanding of history.
Basically, there's a kind of global acceptance of the Marxist view of historiography. This is because history has always had religion contributing to it massively, moreover, Marxists are generally believed to be free from nationalist and jingoist tendencies. So, they're supposed to offer a neutral point of view of the past events. With India, there has been a twin problem. Colonialism + Marxists. Colonialists have always undermined the Indian people and labeled them with a racist identity which was characterized by inferiority to the Whites. They even claimed to have brought "Civilisation" to India. According to them, we were just a bunch of barbarics fighting amongst ourselves. With Marxists, the problem has always been with the formation of India. They don't sanction the creation of this country as a democratic republic. The socialists in Indira Gandhi cabinet made her add the word "Socialist" in the Preamble. Prior to that, with the establishment of JNU, Indira Gandhi allowed the Marxists to get a control over the academia. Hence you have the likes of RS Sharma, Bipan Chandra, Romila Thapar, Irfan Habib, Satish Chandra, etc. writing the NCERT books for you.
If you are answering questions prakhar: How do we separate the art and the context or history behind it or we don't and just see it as a specimen of what it depicts? I was thinking about Taj Mahal and other islamic monuments which as beautiful as they are have a history of human barbarism; with Taj Mahal being the burial of Shah Jahan and we Indians paying visit to one of our most barbaric ruler.
I'll tell you one intersting fact. The Wahhabis and Salafis have always wanted to demolish the Taj Mahal. In fact, they would go on to destroy every building that's ever been constructed as a part of Islamic architecture, including the Kaba. They believe God, and therefore Islam, can't be represented through any building, shrine, painting, etc.
Imagine you record history in several forms like normal records, poetry and inscriptions in temples. During foreign invasions, normal records would be the easiest to destroy. So, how about this theory that we only have recorded history as poems and other forms because the regular normal records were destroyed because they were easily identified.
I am a history student , and first time I'm feeling excitement about my subject and now i know what i have to do in future
I am literally crying at the Manipur story. I mean seriously this is what needs to be taught in our classes. Thank you Prakhar. ❤️
Keep crying
@@yj9032 He had spent whole night with ur mom and u r thae result 😂 And this is very very bad behaviour with ur Father 😂So shut ur ur mouth !
Why you are crying?
Manipur mess was created by your family only.
Now things 5:19 are moving in right direction slowly.
If we accept you view,
The atrocities created Church and you religion in America,Africa and Australia to the own inhabitants difficult to imagine.They destroyed everything and imposed a fake religion which just opposite what Jesus was propogated.
Keep up the good work, Prakhar. Everyone needs to be heard. We have already gone too far with the Marxist view of history. Now, it's time to appreciate the differing scholarly views and Dr. Sampath is one brilliant intellectual doing the job. 👍🏼
@BritishRajtheTrueIndia spam karna band kar lawde.
@Robert Clive the founder of India triggered
@Robert Clive the founder of India andhnamazi be like:- saaar Indians hindus coming to London saar..our women are being taken by strong masculine hindus saar😭😭 we can't do anything saaar..we shall again conkaar India saar😤
wow man, your channel is a good example of what we call "darbari historians". Please contact romila thapar and gang you belong in that gang please join them there're loose members (and respect) anyways
@Robert Clive the founder of India wow man, your channel is a good example of what we call "darbari historians". Please contact romila thapar and gang you belong in that gang please join them there're loose members (and respect) anyways
I just come from Beerbiceps podcast of Vikram Sampath because UA-cam recommended it. The difference between this host and Ranveer is huge. Prakhar knows what he is talking and gives his own opinions, questions and carry the conversation forward in a meaningful way. Whereas Ranveer just ask questions and does interviews in the name of podcast. When it comes to his opinions, he resorts to conspiracy theories, predictions and fantasy. He would bring aliens and spirits into a conversation of economics and political science! Anyway, I think I am gonna read his book. Great content.
Can't be put in a better way
Because Allhabadia is an entrepreneur and a businessman. So his art is making money and he is doing well at it.
Dude I wish I had a history teacher like him
Brave hearts of Bharat is a fkin awesome book. Love this guy❤️
This is such an interesting conversation. This channel needs to grow 10 times bigger. Good work brother. And if you read this, please try to bring J Sai Deepak and talk about his new book India Bharat and Pakistan.
Amazing conversation. The questions were on point. Hoping for more of this with Vikram Sampath.
Listening to Prakhar first time but listened to Dr Sampath couple of times. What a conversation?!?! Omg! Enjoyed it thoroughly to know our beautiful past thru this discussion. Sampath is really great in providing the account in the midst simple way.
Hats off to you both. Keep it up with such podcast to bring out our true history to surface.
Dr. Vikram Sampat is a legend. Anyone who's challenging the inferiority complex and British/Islamic Glorification by the 20th century Historians.
More power to you sir and thanks for inspiring the future Historians of the country who will truthfully present our rich history, knowledge & culture and not be bullied and forced to comply with the self hating leftists and their hold on the higher education appratus
Wonderful!
It is pleasing how beautifully Vikram sir explains History.
Ufff bro, such elegant demeanor ✨
Love to hear this young historian Vikram Sampath Sir
this conversation was like a brightly burning fiery light!
Dr.Vikram Sampaths an intelligent stimulation. Though I am beginning to hear these now(87yrs) yet I am thrilled. In my days we were prescribed in school curriculum history of Mazumdar. I fave some knowledge of those. Since I am science stud
Bot I have no word to thank Dr VS narration.
dude. vikram spitting facts. just bought his book
धर्मार्थ-काम-मोक्षाणाम्, उपदेश-समन्वितम्
पूर्व-वृत्त-कथा-युक्तम् इतिहासं प्रचक्षते
dharmārtha-kāma-mokṣāṇām, upadeśa-samanvitam
pūrva-vṛtta-kathā-yuktam itihāsaṃ pracakṣate
Ancient Indian history begins with Brahma, the founder of Vedic sciences, and his son Svāyambhuva Manu, the first king of the Brahmāvarta kingdom. A few kings and kingdoms may have existed before the lifetime of Brahma but the official recordkeeping of the genealogy of Indian kings and their history commenced from Brahma and his son Manu. Traditionally, the Sūtas and the Magadhas were entrusted with the task of maintaining this multigenerational chronological genealogy of the Manu and the Puru dynasties, charting their lineages since the early Rigvedic period. Though the two communities pursued their ancestral duty with utmost dedication, it was never a feasible expectation to maintain this continuity for thousands of years, which is perhaps why there are some gaps in the chronological genealogy of various dynasties. These historical records had been formally compiled into Purāṇa-Itihāsa Saṁhitās for the first time by Veda Vyāsa’s pupil Romaharṣaṇa Sūta, during the
later Rigvedic period. After this, the subject of Purāṇa-Itihāsa formally became a part of Vedic education and the pupils of Romaharṣaṇa Sūta also compiled Purāṇa Saṁhitās. The tradition of periodic compilation of Bhaviṣyat Purāṇa was introduced in the post-Vedic period. Then, the same Purāṇa Saṁhitās were recompiled in Laukika Sanskrit later, and came to be known as Purāṇas. It seems that the tradition of historical recordkeeping declined after the reign of the Ikśvāku King Agnivarṇa, the 25th descendant of Sri Rāma. Kālidāsa abruptly ended his Raghuvaṁśa Mahākāvya after the reign of Agnivarṇa, probably due to a long interregnum in genealogical continuity of the Raghu dynasty. Evidently, the Ikśvāku dynasty had declined after the reign of Agnivarṇa. Vyāsa, of the Mahābhārata era, revived the tradition of the study of Purāṇas and recompiled them into eighteen Purāṇas. Some Upapurāṇas were also compiled after the Mahābhārata era. The Purāṇas available to us, it seems, were finally recompiled and updated around 500-100 BCE. This revived Puranic tradition survived till the Gupta period. Only Bhaviṣyat Purāṇa continued to be periodically updated after the Gupta period. Purāṇas narrate the continuous genealogical and chronological history of ancient India, starting from the Mahābhārata war, and the coronation of King Yudhiṣṭhira, and ending at the Gupta period. All Indian traditional and literary sources unanimously indicate the date
of the Mahābhārata war to be in the 32nd century BCE and epigraphic evidence of the Aihole inscription1 conclusively establishes the date of the Mahābhārata war in 3162 BCE. Purāṇas refer to the Saptarṣi calendar that commenced around 6777 BCE, assuming the hypothetical position of Saptarṣis (the Big Dipper) in Aśvinī Nakśatra. Accordingly, Purāṇas, Vṛddhagarga and Varāhamihira, and other ancient scriptures unambiguously mention that the Saptarśis were in Maghā Nakśatra around 3177-3077 BCE, during the reign of King Yudhiṣṭhira. A reconstructed land grant of King Janamejaya, son of Parīkśit, was found in Tirthahalli district of Karnataka, which is dated in the 89th year of the Yudhiṣṭhira era (3073-3072 BCE). So, Purāṇas relate the complete genealogies of various dynasties of Magadha Empire after
the Mahābhārata war. We also have sufficient epigraphic evidence starting from the reign of King Aśoka. Thus, we can factually and accurately establish the chronological history of ancient India from the Mahābhārata war (3162 BCE) to modern times. The tougher challenge is to establish the chronology of ancient India beyond the date of the Mahābhārata war. Traditionally, Purāṇas follow the timeline of Chaturyuga cycle for narrating the chronological history
of ancient India - however, the timeline of Chaturyuga cycle had been revised and enlarged during the post-Vedic and the post-Rāmāyaṇa eras with an objective to achieve accurate astronomical calculations in whole numbers, because ancient Indian astronomers preferred to work with whole numbers instead of odd fractions. Unfortunately, the original Purāṇa Saṁhitās written by Romaharṣaṇa Sūta and his pupils, the earliest versions of Purāṇas, have been lost long ago. In fact, it seems even the Rāmāyaṇa and the Mahābhārata have been recompiled during the Śātavāhana-Gupta period.
The available versions of Purāṇas, and the Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata relate numerous legends of the Vedic and post-Vedic period and also provide the genealogical information of various dynasties and lineages starting from the time of Vaivasvata Manu. Since the later timeline of Manvantaras and Chaturyugas consisted of the cycles of millions of years, it has been assumed that the great rishis and kings will be reborn in the beginning of Vaivasvata Manvantara. This may be the reason why the updaters of Purāṇas give almost all genealogies starting from the time of Vaivasvata Manu though they have propounded the beginning of the chronological history of ancient India from Svāyambhuva Manu. This contradictory assumption led to some chronological inconsistencies in the narratives of various genealogies as well as certain misplaced identifications of historical personalities with identical names. One of the biggest mistakes committed by the Puranic updaters is the misidentification of Veda Vyāsa of Rigvedic era as Vyāsa
of the Mahābhārata era that led to the concocted concept of twenty eight Vyāsas and the impossible theory of eight chirajīvins. The later timeline of millions of years also misled the Puranic updaters to assign 60000 years to King Sagara and 11000 years to King Rāma and suchlike. The popularity of Adbhuta Rasa in Sanskrit poetry and drama, and the poetic exaggeration of narratives, had gradually transformed the historical legends into historico-mythological legends.
These problems in the ancient Indian historiography led to the colonial notion that ancient Indians had no sense of history and lacked historical consciousness.
One of the best thing is your inclusion of relevant pictures which keeps it interesting.
.
In Sanatana, Itihasa has been written in poetic form illustrating all the rasas, so that consumers of Itihasa emotionally connect to the story and can retrieve even if the source of stories are destroyed. That's why unless you read the text with Shraddha and Titiksha you won't be able to experience it.
I truly love your channel brother..keep doing the best work.
Thank you so much
Kudos to the editor, the progress bar for every section is just next level thought.
This one's gonna be a treat to watch!
most beautifully edited podcast episode ever.
Thanks for these types of podcast. Nice improvements in editing and references. Up to the mark thing.
He single handedly brought down thr entire left ecosystem in India and in west.
I still laugh at imagining the face of Audrey Truschk
pseudo left*
Absolutely true.
Bro please be the voice for our history every single person doesn't have time to invest and find truth on our own, we are searching for the content like this, we want history content more..(Indic side of history)
Thank you so much....Prakhar , fun was never so much learning!!!
Every time I listen to him I takeaway a mountain of new information . What a blessing to our nation!
This is an uber fab podcast, you asked such good & different thought provoking questions which Vikram answered in his very unique style & his deep,profound knowledge which makes our minds tick.Nobody explains effects of colonisation as well as Vikram does, Love how objective he is,He is so right in explaining why a traumatic past needs healing and its relation to current politics. You were v right in ur reasons in putting those Indian americans back in thier place.Such a shame these leftist historians need to be held to account for providing false fabricated evidences.Excellent podcast thank you 👍
Admirable analysis by comparative study of ours with others . Thanks.
Hats off to you Vikram sir on your achievements❤
Let hindus come together at least now.
God bless you.
Great editing & topic vice distribution of clips, kudos to the team !
It means indian brains r superior than modern computer. The way vedas were memorized, such technique must b teach to modern indian students. M very interested to learn ancient Indian method of memorizing.🙏
It was much needed thanks prakhar
Man this podcast is gold !!!!!
Hey prakhar, invite Dr Meenakshi Jain to talk about iconoclasm in Indian history
@Robert Clive the founder of India meenakshi jain has documented all the incidents of sati and analyzed it. She has been awarded Padma Shri for her research. She is above all the chomilas and chaRaS sharmas.
@@Desi.Superman The guy is most probably a Hindu hater, spamming all over comment section.
@India a failed State every village had Sati ~ gore ki jh@at ka keeda. Chomilas aur charas Teri tarah kuch keede hai jo ICHR me baith kar ncert likhne hai
@India a failed State tu Kitna zyaada dillusion me jee rha hai ki tujhe basic ncert bhi nahi pta, think about this first then think about USA and gori jh@t
@Robert Clive the founder of India lmao, Mai itna bada comment padhne nahi baitha...
Hey Prakhar!
A podcast with J Sai Deepak would really be fun to watch.
Thanks a lot for the editing 🙏
Great work mr Prakhar. More Young minds like you should promote forgotten history, facts about barbarians. You people can sync with younger lot. Make them feel proud. You, keerti, Ranveer (TRS) deserve appreciation. Listening to great minds such as Vikram, sai Deepak is a feast to eyes and ears. God bless you
Prakhar this might be the best interview Sampath has done, at least in the terms of input from the interviewer & visuals.
You might not get the views ‘views’ but I have seen most of youtube & your channel might be one of the best channels out there in terms of content growth. KEEP UP THE WORK, BEHEN PARIWAR MAACHDENGE❤❤
Bro Vikram Sampath! What a surprise!
Real Indian history is very very rich.. and our children should know the complete version
I like this dude. He seems genuine and has the balls to call a spade a spade, unlike today's jingoism and everything-in-the-past-was-glorious narrative.
In the world full of abhijeet chavdas be a vikram sampath.
Dharma(righteousness) and adharma (wrong) always co-existed in society.
Bharat,China,Persia,Egypt, Greece all them do have a glorious past and that of course doesn't not mean everything was perfect.
Past Is glorious indeed...why shame to consider it that way?
When you can't handle facts because of your indoc trination you call it Jingoism, India's Hindu past was definitely glorious, anti nationals like you can't handle this fact, obviously glorious Hindu past wasn't perfect, Abhijit Chavda is actually telling the truth which you can't handle. Don't try to portray that you aren't biased by supporting Vikram, you are leftist para site and will remain so. Vikram doesnt know that Marxists are the ones who definitely mani pulated Indian history.
Abhijeet chavda suffers from Zingoism, seriously??
It was fantastic.. Thanks for doing this..
This was Epic and Mind boggling!😱 Keep Up the Good Work!
One more OG video on the row.. killing it dude.... 👄🤘
thanks prakhar bhaiya
such legendry podcast only 58 k views.
Love from ASSAM bro ❤️
Loved it ❤
Indians set most knowledge to poetry as it was very easy to memorise what was chanted or sung. Many words for each object (prabhakar, bhaskar, surya etc) is not arbitrary but recognises subjectivity in perception. Depending on whether the Sun is seen as 'bright' or full of rays, etc, the names differed The idea of one objective truth in science is rooted in Abrahamic idea of one objective Truth & God. Indans always recognised subjectivity. Ekam Satyam. Viprah Bahuda Vadanti.
Subscribed to ur channel bro🙌
I'm big fan of Shri Vikram Sampath ji. Always greatt to hear him🔥. Keep growing✌️.
Impressive , didn't expected this to go so deep !
Due to India's large population, perhaps the best way to transmit and preserve knowledge was in poetry form through human learning and memory?
It's just copium.
Khub valo laglo❤❤... Nomoskar 🙏🙏
(Bengali)
Bhakti ras or devotional elements has been added over time to scriptures, much in last millenia. So many things that you may read as itihasa may not be exactly how the orignally author would have composed. The poetic element is always there.
For example Shri Rama is described as a Human being by Maharishi Valmiki (not in the 1st & last khand which are a later additions).
From dissing and pissing on TRS to copying it. You've come a long way, this is growth
Good job. New questions.?.
This needs to be researched either By Dr Prakhar Guta or Dr Vikram Sampath: 1. Mr. Gopalswamy, son of first Indian principal of Guindy Engineering college,studied engineering in Germany before start of WW II. Electronics was the subject
2. Joined Siemens and played part in setting up Lord Haw Haw with German SS.
3. Negotiated with Germans on behalf of Subash Chandra Bose the protocol to be adopted between INA officers and German army officers. 4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Haw-Haw
5. He was shifted to Malaya by submarine before being captured by the British
Brother, such a nice video. I can clearly see the efforts. Editing is so lit. Keep going prakhar. What should we call it "info podcast".
Really wonderful informative discussion between you, Prakhar & Vikram. But, there is a bit of correction needed- the Ahoms came from Burma (present day Myanmar, and not Chinese). In fact Su-Ka-Phaa was a Burmese noble who molded his own Burmese culture with the local Assamese(Oxomiya) Santana culture to give rise to the present Oxomiya culture. Also, Vaishnavism in Manipur was introduced by Shantidas Gosai from Sylhet to King Pamheiba of Manipur in the 17th century.
It's just my own opinion but the bar below which shows the duration of one question... It's very distracting. I couldn't look at the video because I was focused on seeing the bar move. Again, this is my personal opinion that we should not have that bar again. BTW, this video was very informative.
Really great you do a much better and to the point questions and thoughts than the most podcasting industry
part 2 bhai !!
Amazing conversation
One of the best youtube channel
LOVED IT!
social media is helping indians realise their real history.
jai hind jai bharat 🔥🙏👍
Much better than TRS
Enjoyed the convo...
Maybe they could have his books part of our curriculum atleast till class 10th. OP podcast
Great episode. Just pls remove this bright lighting on every frame change. That's very irritating.
We want Vikram Sampat part 2
people who really enjoyed this podcast, i desire to be friends with you. let's plan a trip to the british library and geek out!
Thanks for mentioning kanhaiyalal maneklal munshi sir 🙏
Love u bro
You have mastered the editing game.
Fantastic guys
you are great bhai
no you
@@PrakharkePravachan bhai your content is really helping me waise mai tumse 1 sal bda hu sharam aati h ki sirf m*th marte beet gyi 🙂
anand ranganathan
abhijeet mitra
harsh madhusudhan
s.gurumurthy
Swaminathan Gurumurthy
aur vivekanand kendra, chinmaya mission se koi aaye toh bhi shi h agle bar
TOP Gupta💸💸💸👑👑👑👑👑
Please have a conversation with J.Sai Deepak sir 🙏
Loving your work 👍
Ahom Dynasty ✊
nice
In India scientific interpretation of history was actually started as early as early 20th century. Men who led such were - Jadunath Sarkar, RC Majumder, Rakhal Das Banerjee etc(most of them from Bengal).
But from 1960s things started changing , they were soon replaced by a historians who were influenced by "Marxist Historiography " and oy they are popular and taught today.
We need to restart our "Scientific interpretation of History " and abolish Marxist Historiography.
Dr. BR Ambedkar had positive views regarding Marx and also stressed the fact that Marxists are ignorant when it comes to understanding of history.
Basically, there's a kind of global acceptance of the Marxist view of historiography. This is because history has always had religion contributing to it massively, moreover, Marxists are generally believed to be free from nationalist and jingoist tendencies. So, they're supposed to offer a neutral point of view of the past events. With India, there has been a twin problem. Colonialism + Marxists. Colonialists have always undermined the Indian people and labeled them with a racist identity which was characterized by inferiority to the Whites. They even claimed to have brought "Civilisation" to India. According to them, we were just a bunch of barbarics fighting amongst ourselves. With Marxists, the problem has always been with the formation of India. They don't sanction the creation of this country as a democratic republic. The socialists in Indira Gandhi cabinet made her add the word "Socialist" in the Preamble. Prior to that, with the establishment of JNU, Indira Gandhi allowed the Marxists to get a control over the academia. Hence you have the likes of RS Sharma, Bipan Chandra, Romila Thapar, Irfan Habib, Satish Chandra, etc. writing the NCERT books for you.
Prakhar please please please bring Mr. J sai Deepak on your podcast. It will be a bomb. 🙏🙏🙏
Nice one
Wow
23:00
56:20
1:03:40
1:08:40
If you are answering questions prakhar:
How do we separate the art and the context or history behind it or we don't and just see it as a specimen of what it depicts?
I was thinking about Taj Mahal and other islamic monuments which as beautiful as they are have a history of human barbarism; with Taj Mahal being the burial of Shah Jahan and we Indians paying visit to one of our most barbaric ruler.
I'll tell you one intersting fact. The Wahhabis and Salafis have always wanted to demolish the Taj Mahal. In fact, they would go on to destroy every building that's ever been constructed as a part of Islamic architecture, including the Kaba. They believe God, and therefore Islam, can't be represented through any building, shrine, painting, etc.
Bro upload it in Spotify too please
Man❤️
I had suggested vikram name in one of his prakhars stream
❤️❤️❤️
We need to improve our education system. The improved version is still not enough.
Ye sahi kia bhidu ... Ye video idea badiya laga ...
Imagine you record history in several forms like normal records, poetry and inscriptions in temples. During foreign invasions, normal records would be the easiest to destroy. So, how about this theory that we only have recorded history as poems and other forms because the regular normal records were destroyed because they were easily identified.
Based.
grt video
*I love vikram sampat and always will.* I don't like colonized minds like Prakhar.
Live podcast karna chahiye tha